C-350 "The Knight" is ready to enter the army

67
The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that in 2019, the Russian Aerospace Forces will enter service with the new anti-aircraft missile system C-350 “Vityaz. The complex is planned to be sent to the training center (TC) of the Leningrad region. The exact delivery time of the C-350 Vityaz has not yet been specified.

C-350 "The Knight" is ready to enter the army




In addition to the “Vityazi” in 2019, it is planned to bring into the Russian Federation of the Russian Federation about 10 sets of the Pantsir-S air defense missile system and the C-400 air defense missile system.

ZRK C-350 "Vityaz" - is the latest development of Russian gunsmiths. Weapon C-350 series is a medium-range complex used for the organization of air defense. Vityaz was developed by the designers of the Almaz-Antey concern, whose products are known to be in great demand from foreign customers. Until 2020, the Ministry of Defense plans to acquire at least 38 sets of C-350 ..

The development of an experimental version of the complex began in the 90s of the last century. For the first time an experimental version of the C-350, mounted on the KamAZ chassis, was shown as an exhibit at the Max-2001 air show. The newest weapon replaced one of the obsolete modifications of the C-300.

The Vityaz complex is focused on the creation of multi-stage protection ensuring the safety of the state’s airspace. SAM can hit manned Aviation (airplanes, helicopters) drones, as well as cruise and ballistic missiles. In addition, it is able to prevent impacts from low-flying objects. Compared to the S-400 analogue, the S-350 Vityaz complex is somewhat smaller in size, while it belongs to a highly mobile weapon and uses similar 9M96E2 ammunition.

The first prototype of the Vityaz C-350 air defense system was shown to the public at the Obukhov combine in St. Petersburg in 2013. From this moment on, the veil of secrecy has been removed from the weapon. The main production is focused on the state combine in Obukhov.

The new installation can operate in self-propelled mode, together with a fixed wide-function radar. Also, the ability of electronic scanning space and the presence of a command post on the main chassis. The weapon is designed to protect civilian and military targets from massive strikes inflicted by various types of air attack weapons.

The complex can repel the enemy attack in the 360 sector of degrees from various kinds of attacks with small and extended missile flight intervals. Working autonomously, the system can be part of the air defense groups of the Russian Federation with control from other command posts, while the staff crew provides only the control of the work of weapons in firing.

Modern models of the Vityaz anti-aircraft complex are installed on the BAZ-69092-012 chassis. The following are some of the tactical and technical characteristics of this weapon:

The power plant is a hp 470 diesel engine.
Curb weight - 15,8 t.
Payload - 14,2 t.
The total weight after installation is up to 30 tons.
The maximum lifting angle is 30 degrees.
The depth of the ford is 1700 mm.
The defeat of aerodynamic / ballistic targets at the same time - 16 / 12.
The index of the synchronous number of induced anti-aircraft controlled charges - 32.
Parameters of the affected area by maximum range and height (aerodynamic targets) - 60 / 30 km.
Similar characteristics for ballistic type targets - 30 / 25 km.
The period of bringing the vehicle to combat status on the march is no more than 5 minutes.
The crew of the crew in this case is 3 person.
  • http://terraoko.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    6 February 2019 06: 03
    To Syria him! So that some sleep badly!
    1. +13
      6 February 2019 06: 18
      As children laughing Any air defense system without air cover equal in quality to the air force of the enemy fighter aircraft will be carried out in one wave of attack. In addition to fighter aircraft, AWACS, EW systems, etc. are needed. And most importantly, qualified specialists, who in combat conditions will make it all work effectively in one bundle.
      1. +7
        6 February 2019 06: 25
        Yes, it does. However, the article does not say about the rest of the elements (and the article is not about them). And about Syria ... But who knows, maybe they tried it already.
        1. +2
          6 February 2019 06: 28
          I agree, responded to the comments of Theodore. The S-350 itself is a quality product.
        2. 0
          6 February 2019 06: 30
          Quote: 210ox
          Yes, it does. However, the article does not say about the rest of the elements (and the article is not about them). And about Syria ... But who knows, maybe they tried it already.

          They just don't know about Krasnodar. If they wouldn’t let it out ...
      2. +1
        6 February 2019 11: 22
        no one flies in the area where the air defense system works. This is an axiom. And aircraft do not fly. no bad.
      3. +2
        6 February 2019 11: 59
        Quote: Krasnodar
        As children laughing Any air defense system without air cover equal in quality to the air force of the enemy fighter aircraft will be carried out in one wave of attack. In addition to fighter aircraft, AWACS, EW systems, etc. are needed. And most importantly, qualified specialists, who in combat conditions will make it all work effectively in one bundle.

        Do not write nonsense, then the Israeli Air Force has been attacking from Antilivan with cruise missiles for so long, and not as before from Syrian airspace. All the same, the kinship of Jews and Arabs is felt. There is just as much bragging and hatred. Because of the 2nd Armor destroyed over many years with the help of including Kolchuga. Your words are far from reality. And imagine that instead of so many cruise missiles shot down during all this time and little noticeable bombs, planes would be shot down. The Israeli Air Force would probably have no more aviation left. Just the air defense stands still constant shelling, and aviation is safe because it does not enter the air defense zone, but shoots from far away. The conditions are not equal to say the least.
        1. +3
          6 February 2019 12: 02
          I don’t know where the Israeli Air Force is attacking. )) Yes, and it doesn’t matter .. Although from the dark side of the moon. I wrote about how the country's air defense should look like. No more.
          1. 0
            6 February 2019 12: 40
            Quote: Krasnodar
            I don’t know where the Israeli Air Force is attacking. )) Yes, and it doesn’t matter .. Although from the dark side of the moon. I wrote about how the country's air defense should look like. No more.

            You wanted to say that the S-300 should not just stand, but be used for its intended purpose. But political agreements are above all else. Moreover, Israel and Iran are instruments of Arab world governance. They mean a confrontation between themselves which is actually not there. In Moscow, the Israeli and Iranian military were then at the same table under the guise that Russia was reconciling them. Before the military operation in Syria, a representative Israeli political and military delegation led by Netanyahu came to Russia, then the same delegation from Iran. Then the operation began. The Arab world came out out of control and Russia helped bring him back under control.
            1. -3
              6 February 2019 12: 45
              Are we talking about geopolitics or air defense? )))
              If it’s about geopolitics, then there’s that adder, you simplify everything. If about air defense - S-300, in my opinion, does not have time to prepare for a shot at attacking aircraft. For a bunch of reasons.
              1. +2
                6 February 2019 13: 02
                Quote: Krasnodar
                Are we talking about geopolitics or air defense? )))
                If it’s about geopolitics, then there’s that adder, you simplify everything. If about air defense - S-300, in my opinion, does not have time to prepare for a shot at attacking aircraft. For a bunch of reasons.

                Do not have time to prepare? But the order was being prepared? Military people are forced. Everything depends on the order, and the order depends on the policy. So both politics and air defense are subordinate to the same goal. And you don’t keep people for idiots. You didn’t have time to prepare, you see.
                1. +1
                  6 February 2019 13: 09
                  I'm about a friend.
                  Here they fly up to the smallest to antilivan. They do not see. They make a slide, put EW jammers, use REP tools. While they are being cleaned (and they are already afraid of bullets in the white light, like a penny, and this is not cheap), the Israelis shoot back and go to the ultra-small. In addition, when F-35 is used, they can be seen even at high altitudes from a distance at which they do not approach the S-300, etc. But this is my opinion. The S-300s themselves are good air defense systems, like all Soviet / Russian air defense systems. But I wrote my opinion about an effective air defense system above. Much is needed there.
                  1. +1
                    6 February 2019 13: 19
                    Quote: Krasnodar
                    I'm about a friend.
                    Here they fly up to the smallest to antilivan. They do not see. They make a slide, put EW jammers, use REP tools. While they are being cleaned (and they are already afraid of bullets in the white light, like a penny, and this is not cheap), the Israelis shoot back and go to the ultra-small. In addition, when F-35 is used, they can be seen even at high altitudes from a distance at which they do not approach the S-300, etc. But this is my opinion. The S-300s themselves are good air defense systems, like all Soviet / Russian air defense systems. But I wrote my opinion about an effective missile defense system above. Much is needed there.

                    Well, there’s a whole system. You won’t describe everything. We don’t know much. But how 75% of the missiles were shot down last year’s April raid. Something like Delia and little-noticeable air bombs. Maybe they don’t want to shine frequencies ahead of time. Assumption. ACS air defense greatly reduces the reaction time to attacks, which was not in Iraq, Yugoslavia. REB. And so on.
                    1. +1
                      6 February 2019 13: 24
                      I would not believe the reports of the Arabs on this subject, although anything can be. 75% is 75. It’s just that all the garbage is as follows - the Israelis were injured by the Doomsday War of 1973, then they lost a third of their aircraft from air defense systems in the early days of the war. Therefore, for 45 years, they worked to combat the layered air defense system. And the Syrians are fragments of the system, scattered in different places. Therefore, the effect is not very - one F-16 for 200 with something raids.
                      1. 0
                        6 February 2019 13: 33
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        I would not believe the reports of the Arabs on this subject, although anything can be. 75% is 75. It’s just that all the garbage is as follows - the Israelis were injured by the Doomsday War of 1973, then they lost a third of their aircraft from air defense systems in the early days of the war. Therefore, for 45 years, they worked to combat the layered air defense system. And the Syrians are fragments of the system, scattered in different places. Therefore, the effect is not very - one F-16 for 200 with something raids.

                        The F-16s were shot down with the S-200 and when it was impossible not to shoot down. The Israelis began to allow themselves too much in the sky of Syria. The Syrians are now weak. They do not need a conflict with Israel, but there are red lines. Yes and money for a tight No air defense. Israel trained trained. But somehow the Syrians are getting out. Air defense around the world is also constantly changing, acquiring new functions.
                      2. +1
                        6 February 2019 13: 37
                        S-125 shot down. The S-200 is 37 thousand balls, they hit the front end, and in the F-16 both pilots survived. About air defense in the world is understandable. The eternal opposition of the sword and protection. In Israel and Syria - a state of war since 1948, to go into these disassemblies - well, nafig.
                      3. +1
                        6 February 2019 13: 53
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        S-125 shot down. The S-200 is 37 thousand balls, they hit the front end, and in the F-16 both pilots survived. About air defense in the world is understandable. The eternal opposition of the sword and protection. In Israel and Syria - a state of war since 1948, to go into these disassemblies - well, nafig.

                        It’s politics. Today’s war is tomorrow. Peace. Some kind of diplomatic functions in Russia. Like Syria they want to return to the Arab League, I’m under control of Saudi Arabia. A new constitution is being prepared. Israel and the SA have unofficially declared Turkey their main enemy. Like the Santa Barbara series. It is not clear what will happen tomorrow.
                      4. +3
                        6 February 2019 14: 01
                        Iran declared an enemy. Turkey is the most civilized Muslim country of BV, despite the fact that Erdogan has done a lot of business there. Therefore, the Jews with the Saudis are not jerking against the Turks, they are not dangerous to them. Russia in Syria due to bases and control of oil prices for BV. So far, praise Gd, everything costs relatively little blood, but in any case, the region is a golem viper. Kurds, Persians, Turks, Jews, Arabs, Shiites, Sunnis, Alawites, Yezidis, oil, gas, holy places, clan building of society among the Arabs ... booth ... Snake ball, in short.
                      5. 0
                        6 February 2019 14: 09
                        Chef Mossad called a couple of months ago at a meeting with the intelligence of the world of the Gulf countries during the discussion of Syria, namely Turkey as the main enemy, Turkey, etc. the latter has more opportunities than Iran. There was a leak in the media. And no matter who is more attractive. Assad is also attractive.
                      6. 0
                        6 February 2019 14: 12
                        I have not read that. About the boss of Mossad. Assad is civilian, he’s just nobody now. Meetings on the future of Syria are held without his participation - Putin, Erdogan and Khamenai.
                2. 0
                  6 February 2019 16: 29
                  Remember Chechnya. How many orders were canceled!
  2. 0
    6 February 2019 06: 07
    But what about Buk?
    1. +5
      6 February 2019 06: 38
      beech is a military air defense.
      1. 0
        6 February 2019 06: 42
        Something spawned a lot of types. You need to choose the best, so it’s cheaper and easier to organize air defense management.
        1. +6
          6 February 2019 07: 43
          what nafig spawn?
          There are 2 types of air defense. military and air defense stationary objects.
          troops must move as part of the troops, therefore they are tracked, for stationary objects there are no such requirements, therefore there is a wheelbase.
          1. +3
            6 February 2019 08: 32
            Quote: just explo
            Arms must move as part of the troops, therefore they are tracked, for stationary objects there are no such requirements, therefore there is a wheelbase.

            ===========
            Well what to add? Well, except that: "Troop" complexes are closer to the "front line" and therefore should have at least light armor protection (missile and artillery shelling, enemy DRG, etc.). And the "on-site" air defense systems are subject to increased requirements for habitability and comfort of work, since they must be able to carry out constant combat duty (24 hours a day, for weeks and months) drinks
            1. -2
              6 February 2019 09: 31
              This is all true, but the unification of missiles and equipment by 90 percent can be carried out. And at the moment there is a wild variety of types performing almost the same tasks S-300V4 - (S-300PMU) S-400; S-350 - "Buk"; "Thor" - "Shell" (and "Wasp" in the same place)
              1. +1
                6 February 2019 17: 01
                Quote: mark1
                a wild variety of types performing almost the same tasks S-300V4 - (S-300PMU) S-400; S-350 - Buk; "Thor" - "Shell" (and "Wasp" in the same place)

                Oh wow. "Horses, people mingled in a heap." Are the S-400 and Pantsir, in your opinion, "practically similar systems"? request
                1. 0
                  6 February 2019 19: 25
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  "Horses mixed in a heap, people."

                  It’s all mixed up with you, at least pay attention to punctuation marks - the compared complexes go through dash, although in your case it seems more important to you to shout out without delving into the essence.
        2. 0
          6 February 2019 10: 18
          Quote: riwas
          Something spawned a lot of types. You need to choose the best, so it’s cheaper and easier to organize air defense management.

          The S-350 is an analogue of the Patriot. If the intermediate missile was brought to mind then the range is 250 km, the altitude is 35 km. 12 missiles on the launcher. Buk-m3, if I can say so on TTX analogue S-300PS 70 km range 35 km altitude. But this is military Air defense.
          1. 0
            6 February 2019 10: 52
            With 350, this is just a replacement With 300, a medium-range air defense system.
            1. 0
              6 February 2019 10: 55
              Quote: Vadim237
              With 350, this is just a replacement With 300, a medium-range air defense system.

              S-350 to replace the latest versions of the s-300pm Favorit and the Patriot analogue. One does not interfere with the other.
            2. +4
              6 February 2019 12: 49
              Quote: Vadim237
              With 350, this is just a replacement With 300, a medium-range air defense system.

              Vityaz replace the air defense system from the 300th series only with the S-300PS, as well as the Buk, since these are the MIDDLE HAND complexes. And the S-300V4, for example, is a long arm air defense system and, by definition, Vityaz with this air defense system in different "weight categories".
              1. +1
                6 February 2019 13: 47
                Quote: NEXUS
                Quote: Vadim237
                With 350, this is just a replacement With 300, a medium-range air defense system.

                Vityaz replace the air defense system from the 300th series only with the S-300PS, as well as the Buk, since these are the MIDDLE HAND complexes. And the S-300V4, for example, is a long arm air defense system and, by definition, Vityaz with this air defense system in different "weight categories".

                Well, why if the intermediate missile 9m96dm was doped, then the range is 250 km, you can change the S-300 BM4. Yes, and the gas rudders will give new interception functions in terms of reliability. And there are more missiles. The S-300 BM4 is an older modernized system. The missile overloads are not so high when intercepted.
              2. -1
                6 February 2019 17: 07
                Beech M 1 - 2 will replace the Beech M3. And C 300V4 will be replaced by Antey 4500 - a deep modernization of C 300V4.
        3. +2
          6 February 2019 11: 57
          Quote: riwas
          Something spawned a lot of types. You need to choose the best, so it’s cheaper and easier to organize air defense management.

          That is how it is. S-400 is the best long-range, S-350 is the best medium, Carapace is the best near.
          According to the Troops, the S-300V4-Buk-Tor line.
          Price - quality for a real purpose., And not for abstract Wishlist.
          1. +1
            6 February 2019 17: 10
            Soon, the SM Shell on a caterpillar track will be added to the troops, in addition to the Tunguska, as shock drones and kamikaze drones, from large to small, have received great development in NATO countries.
            1. +1
              6 February 2019 17: 20
              Quote: Vadim237
              Soon, the SM Shell on a caterpillar track will be added to the troops, in addition to the Tunguska, they will be added, since shock drones received a great development in NATO countries

              I’m talking about that. What is a bird, such is a falcon. Shoot all targets, like the Yankees with SM-3? It's a luxury
    2. +7
      6 February 2019 06: 46
      Quote: riwas
      But what about Buk?

      You read the article - "The Vityaz complex is focused on creating a multi-stage protection that ensures the safety of the state's airspace." The weapon is designed to protect civilian and military targets from massive strikes inflicted by various types of air attack.
      And "Buk" was created, first of all, as a military air defense system!
      1. +3
        6 February 2019 06: 49
        What does oriented? Its that in the military air defense can not be used?
        1. +9
          6 February 2019 07: 03
          Quote: riwas
          What does oriented? Its that in the military air defense can not be used?

          The layered defense of stationary objects and military air defense have slightly different tasks. But, like a knife, you can use it in a battle and open cans with stew.
        2. 0
          6 February 2019 08: 29
          Quote: riwas
          What does oriented? Its that in the military air defense can not be used?

          It is possible, but the mobility will not be the same, unlike the Buk, for the same reason, the Pantsir was not adopted by the Air Defense Forces, unlike the Tunguska, although both occupy the same niche.
        3. +1
          6 February 2019 08: 39
          Quote: riwas
          What does oriented? Its that in the military air defense can not be used?

          =========
          Of course it is possible! Only for "object" air defense - "Vityaz" is better suited, and for "military" - "Buk" !!
          PS If you have noticed, the S-300 family also splits into 2 branches: "military" (with indices "B") and object "(with indices" P ").
        4. 0
          6 February 2019 19: 56
          Quote: riwas
          What does oriented? Its that in the military air defense can not be used?

          This means that there is "military air defense" and "air defense of the country".

          Answering your question - you can use it, but not for long laughing

          But seriously, the military air defense has high requirements for maneuverability (such air defense systems are obliged to follow troops though the swamp), autonomy (so that everyone is on the same machine) and security (if the enemy doesn’t hit the enemy, they shouldn’t remove building such a machine).

          These requirements are not imposed on the country's "air defense" - the main thing is the high characteristics of the air defense system, even to the detriment of all this. hi

          Here about this in detail:
  3. +5
    6 February 2019 06: 19
    ... new it is new, it would be necessary to experience and there is a place where .. wink .
    1. +2
      6 February 2019 08: 09
      And not one such place.
    2. +1
      6 February 2019 08: 41
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... new it is new, it would be necessary to experience and there is a place where .. wink .

      ============
      It seems that for this "business will not be" !!! wink
  4. +9
    6 February 2019 06: 49
    So their chassis came in handy, the work was given to the BAZ, otherwise some people thought that Russia would install its new complexes without carts on their carts! negative
    1. -1
      6 February 2019 07: 11
      By the way, an important point. I think their chassis will be replaced more than once by the MZKT.
  5. NKT
    +4
    6 February 2019 07: 09
    The hero went into the army, we are waiting for Morpheus!
    1. +2
      6 February 2019 09: 26
      Quote: NKT
      The hero went into the army, we are waiting for Morpheus!

      =========
      But this is unlikely! The Morpheus program has stalled indefinitely. The concept itself caused an extremely mixed reaction from the military. The reason is that the hemispherical AFAR (namely, it was the "highlight" of Morpheus), with all its indisputable advantages (the ability to continuously scan the hemisphere of the airspace without "dead zones") turned out to be too expensive и challenging... And in terms of its effectiveness (target detection range, coordinate determination accuracy), it is significantly (several times) inferior to traditional "flat PFAR and AFAR same cost! As a result by criterion "cost / efficiency" (or vice versa - "efficiency / cost"), it turned out to be much worse than all existing systems!
      The work seems to be continuing, but returned to the stage of "experimental design" ... When it will be possible to solve this problem, and whether it will be possible at all - this is not known !!
  6. +2
    6 February 2019 08: 33
    Summary: the Belarusian tractors were abandoned (good), the necessary and relevant complex was brought to mind (the layer between the c400 and the shell was empty), we are waiting for good news on Polyment-Redoubt (and the ships now have a medium and modern complex).
  7. 0
    6 February 2019 09: 05
    The maximum range of the C-350: 60 km (aerodynamic targets) and 30 km (ballistic targets) - exactly the same within the radio horizon. C-400 - beyond the radio horizon

    It remains to develop the domestic MNTK with a range of up to 6 km (in fact anti-aircraft KAZ) and the domestic air defense / missile defense will be in full chocolate.
    1. 0
      6 February 2019 10: 24
      Quote: Operator
      The maximum range of the C-350: 60 km (aerodynamic targets) and 30 km (ballistic targets) - exactly the same within the radio horizon. C-400 - beyond the radio horizon

      It remains to develop the domestic MNTK with a range of up to 6 km (in fact anti-aircraft KAZ) and the domestic air defense / missile defense will be in full chocolate.

      This is if you load all the short-range launch missiles. There are still medium-range and intermediate-range missiles 9m96m and 9m96md, respectively.
      1. 0
        6 February 2019 10: 35
        MNTK has its own launcher - a metal box 1x1x1 m with one hundred cells for missiles, transported on a two-axle trailer to a jeep.
    2. 0
      6 February 2019 11: 20
      Quote: Operator
      It remains to develop a domestic MNTK with a range of up to 6 km (essentially an anti-aircraft KAZ)

      Well, MNTK has a range, in my opinion, no more than 3 km (2-3 km); and it has its own specific application ... And for the Pantsir air defense missile system ... "anti-aircraft nails ..." (with a caliber of approximately 57mm ... with a "range", approximately, from 3 km to 5-6 km ...) ... you can try to apply them in other air defense systems.
      1. +1
        6 February 2019 11: 25
        Let it be 3 km - for KAZ this is also suitable.
  8. 0
    6 February 2019 09: 15
    38 to 2020? So 38 for the current year? So it's a good number ..
  9. +2
    6 February 2019 09: 33
    "S-350" Vityaz "is ready to enter the troops"

    Well, if ready, let him do it.
  10. -2
    6 February 2019 10: 53
    Well, "the morning began on the collective farm ..."! Wait, "herbivores"! Nevertheless, I suggest, before writing for joy, to try to "evaluate" the air defense system, at least according to the data that are known (so far, of course, little is known ..., but still.). The complex is armed with 12 9M96E2 SAMs and it is not known: will there be (when will they be ...?) 9M100 SAMs? But there are still "questions": does the complex need 9M100 (?) And, if so, how many are needed? The more missiles 9M100, the less "main" missiles! And so will the air defense system be effective in the event of a significant reduction in the main zur (x <12 ...)? Even, the S-300/400 air defense missile system has a potential for 16 (!) SAMs 9M96 ... (4TPK x 4 SAMs ...) It is also expedient for Vityaz to create a launcher for 16 missiles! Then you can consider the option: 12 "main" missiles 9M96E2 + 4 TPK for 9M100 (or other ...). Well, how many 9M100 will "fit" in the TPK (comparable in terms of "weight and dimensions" with TPK with 9M96 ...) - this is it is necessary to "look" ... On the other hand ... and maybe it is better to make other (specialized!) missiles "for self-defense": lighter, "smaller" ... and maybe cheaper ?! (only so that ... at least 4 missiles in the TPK ...). The control system of "defensive" missiles is compatible with the control system of the complex! You can also consider this option of "self-defense" of the complex: a light launcher on a compact chassis with light "defensive" missiles ... are placed in the combat formations of the Vityaz air defense system ... the control system can be compatible with the control of the air defense missile system ... All this is me to the fact that "some" modern combat experience "says" that anti-aircraft missile systems (medium and long-range) need means of "self-defense" ... and, who knows, maybe after a while the air defense system without " built-in self-defense "will not be comme il faut" ... outdated complex!?
    1. -1
      6 February 2019 12: 31
      PS What kind of "roll"? Half of the comments were "cut off"! And so 2 times in a row ... request
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -1
        6 February 2019 13: 14
        Everything, I'm getting out! Detours, feints ... "front, back, left, right ..." did not help! The comment is not "looming" ... Ahtung! "Terrorists" on VO!
        1. 0
          6 February 2019 14: 12
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          Everything, I'm getting out! Detours, feints ... "front, back, left, right ..." did not help! The comment is not "looming" ... Ahtung! "Terrorists" on VO!

          And you can add the posts, in a separate message, it’s interesting!
          1. 0
            6 February 2019 14: 39
            Tried ... anyway "nicht ferstein"! crying
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    6 February 2019 11: 59
    I understand that this missile system does not have a target illumination station, not a missile guidance station (which reduces the composition of the complex and allows it to be hidden better) since the missiles come with homing heads. And also their number is large enough to be able to fight off the attack on their own several links of fighter bombers.
  12. 0
    6 February 2019 13: 51
    u finally waited. I have been tracking this complex for a long time.
    This is 12 missiles on one launcher, damn it ...
  13. 0
    6 February 2019 16: 15
    The "capacity" of the Vityaz air defense missile launcher is voiced in 12 9M96 missiles ... It is not known whether the 9M100 missiles will be used ... if so, how many are supposed to be on the launcher in one "charge"? Whatever it was, the number of "main" missiles decreases when using (simultaneous ...) 9M100. And this is not "karasho"! Of course, they will try to fit more than one 9M96 missile into the TPK (9M100), but how many? Anyway, it is desirable to increase the number of Vityaz launchers up to 16 missiles ... For comparison, we can cite the following fact: the S-300/400 has the potential for 9M96 by 16 zurs (4 TPK (48N6) x 4 9M96 ... ). With a 16-round launcher, you can use the following "charging" option: 12 "main" missiles (9M96) in "standard" TPK and 4 "standard" TPK with 9M100 ... (the total number of 9M100 can be at least 8 missiles. ..). But, if we consider the presence of the 9M100 mainly as a self-defense weapon of the air defense system, then it may be advisable to consider the creation of lighter, smaller and, perhaps, cheaper "defensive" missiles? One of the conditions should be the possibility of placing in a "standard" TPK (9M96) at least 4 "self-defense" missiles ... with a guidance system compatible with the control of the Vityaz air defense missile system. You can also discuss such an option: the presence of a light launcher with "protective" zuras on a compact chassis or even on a towed trailer (semitrailer) as part of the complex ... This I mean that "some" modern combat experience "says "that medium, long-range air defense systems need self-defense means ... And after a while it may turn out that air defense systems without" built-in "means of" self-defense "will be considered" not comme il faut "(!); that is, obsolete!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"