Soviet Radio F-10

21
The night of November 14. 1941 of the year had already passed into the early morning, when a deafening force of explosions shook Dzerzhinsky Street in Kharkiv and nearby areas of the city. The mansion, located at Dzerzhinsky Street, 17 house, took to the air. Before the war, a single-storey detached house was built for the first secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine, Stanislav Kosior, and after moving the capital from Kharkov to Kiev, the secretaries of the Kharkov regional committee lived in the house. After the occupation of the city, this mansion was chosen by the commander of the German 68 Infantry Division, Major General Georg Brown, as the location of his residence.

As a result of the explosion of a 350-kilogram radio-controlled landmine, the mansion was destroyed. 13 of German soldiers and officers, including the commander of the 68 Infantry Division and part-time military commander of Kharkov, Major General George Brown (posthumously he was given the rank of lieutenant general), two officers of his headquarters, and 4 unter were killed under his rubble. officer and 6 privates. Seriously injured were the chief of the intelligence division of the 68 Infantry Division, a translator and sergeant-major. The bombing on Dzerzhinsky Street in Kharkov became one of the explosions of powerful radiofusers, which were pre-installed by Soviet demining units before handing over the city to the enemy. On the same night, with the help of a pre-laid mine, the support of the Kholodnogorsk viaduct was undermined.



The fact that in Kharkov they will be waiting for mines, the Germans still guessed from the sad experience of Kiev. And October 22 in the building of the NKVD, located on Marazlievskaya street, in the Odessa occupied by the Romanian-German troops, an explosion of a radio-controlled mine set by Soviet sappers even before the surrender of the city occurred. As a result of a powerful explosion, the building partially collapsed, burying people, including 67 officers, under the rubble of 16. The building housed the headquarters of the 10 Infantry Division of the 4 Romanian Army, as well as the military commander's office of the city. During the explosion, the commander of the 10 Infantry Division and the military commandant of the city, the Romanian general Ion Glogogiana, died.


German self-propelled gun StuG III shoots a corner of the house on Moskovsky Prospekt in Kharkov, 1941 year


Knowing what awaits them, the Germans were able to neutralize most of the radiomins installed in Kharkov. For example, when digging a district headquarters building into a ditch, the Germans found an antenna of a radiotomy by which they were able to determine its location. While attempting to disarm an explosive device, a German sapper died and was blown up in a mine trap. At the same time, the Germans managed to extract the charge of a mine (600 kg). October 28 1941, the Germans discovered and defused the mine in the Usovskiy viaduct, and the next day they discovered and defused the radio mine in the railway bridge.

The house, located at Dzerzhinsky Street, 17, German sappers also checked, finding a huge time bomb in the basement of the building under a pile of coal with 600 kg of ammonal. Such a successful discovery completely eased their vigilance, it could not even enter their heads that such a mine could be a deception. Directly beneath it was another mine, a little deeper, this time F-10 with 350 kg of explosives, it was she who exploded in the basement of the house after Major General Georg Brown moved into it in 13 in November with his headquarters.

Above the creation of radio fugas in the USSR began to work long before the war. They began to create in Ostehbyuro, which was founded in 1927 year. The works are led by a specialist in explosions at a distance, Vladimir Bekauri, and Academician Vladimir Mitkevich also made a great contribution to the creation of Soviet radiomins. The tests conducted and the tactical and technical characteristics of the radiomen made a pleasant impression on the military, so already in 1930 the decision was made to deploy the production of radio minions, originally designated “Bemi” (derived from the name Bekauri - Mitkevich). Already in 1932, the Red Army had divisions that were armed with various types of radio-controlled land mines, which in those years were designated as TOC, a technique of special secrecy.

Soviet Radio F-10

The control unit of the radio minomine F-10, connected to the battery, in the foreground is the extracted decoder


Before the Great Patriotic War, a new objective mine, which consisted of an F-10 radio unit and a charge, the power of which could vary in a wide range of values, began to arrive in the Red Army sapper units. Externally, the radio was a metal box 40x38x28 centimeters - control unit, eight-lamp radio, a signal decoder. The mass of such a box, which in turn was placed in a rubber bag, was approximately 35 kg. The box could be installed inside the object to be mined where it was most convenient, as the Finns noted, it could be installed at a depth of up to 2,5 meters. The mine also included a radio antenna with a length of 30 meters. The eight-lamp radio mine was powered by a battery (the battery and the control unit were placed in boxes of the same dimension), which was connected with a power cable. Depending on the mode of operation, the radiomine could be waiting for a signal to undermine from 4 to 40 days.

The F-10 radio-controlled object mine was intended for destruction by undermining the most important industrial, military and political facilities, as well as key infrastructure facilities. It was about the objects, the decision on the destruction of which could not be taken in the usual manner either at the time of the abandonment by the Soviet troops of the area, or later, and which were subject to destruction only when special circumstances occurred.

Such objects included large bridges on highways and railways; viaducts; tunnels; dams; driveways under overpasses, where a detour is impossible or extremely difficult; railway junctions; hydraulic structures; tank farms, pumping stations; aerodrome infrastructure: hangars, flight control points, repair shops, fuel tanks; electric power units of large power plants, industrial facilities; mines; telephone and radio nodes; socially significant buildings that are suitable for placing the headquarters and institutions of the enemy's armies, as well as using them as barracks and commandant's offices.


F-10 radio mines control unit without housing


Structurally, the mine was a control unit that could receive and decipher the signals received by the radio, producing an electrical pulse capable of blowing up to three electric detonators, and using a special intermediate splitter unit - to 36 electric detonators. The mass of explosives in such a radiocoupler could vary depending on the nature and size of the object being mined and could be from several tens of kilograms to several tons (according to the experience of use). The control unit could be located together with the charge (charges), and at a distance from them to 50 meters. At the same time, each of the three charges had its own electric blast line.

At a distance from 0 to 40 meters from F-10 there was a wire antenna with a length of at least 30 meters. The direction and placement of the antenna were determined by the conditions of radio waves, but in general it could be buried in the ground to a depth of 50-80 cm, placed in water to a depth of 50 cm, or embedded in walls to a depth of no more than 6 see. using a feeder up to 40 meters. Three two-core electric blasting cables came out of the F-10, the length of these cables could be up to 50 meters. It was desirable that the length of all three electrically explosive circuits be approximately equal, in order to prevent a large difference in the resistivity of the branches. Directly to the ends of the cable were connected electrical detonators, inserted into charges of explosives, which turned the device into a formidable radio-controlled explosive bomb of immense power.

In addition, the radio operator could be equipped with a self-destruct device using a delayed-action fuse (up to 120 days), a ten-hour day contactor, a thirty-five-day time contactor, an hourly FMV-16 fuse (up to 16 days), an hourly FMV-60 fuse (up to 60 days). However, the sounds of the work of such watch movements were a significant unmasking factor for mines. With the naked ear, one could clearly distinguish the ticking of a mine clock placed in the ground from a distance of 5-10 cm from the ground; When the Germans used special listening equipment manufactured by Elektro-Akustik, the ticking of the clock was picked up from a distance from 20 to 30 meters, and the watch winding taps from 15-30 meters.


German soldiers on the background of the extracted radiomin F-10 and boxes of explosives


Military radio stations of a divisional, corps or army level could be used as radio transmitters that were used to initiate a controlled explosion of a radiofugus. According to official Soviet information, on the 22 of June 1941 of the year, the RKKA had operational radio stations with a power output of 1 kW and a range of about 600 km; radio stations RAO-KV, which have an output power of 400-500 W and a communication range of up to 300 km; RSB-F radio stations with an 40-50 W output power and a communication range of up to 30 km. All of the above radio stations operated in the wavelength range from 25 to 120 meters, that is, in the short and medium range of radio waves. For example, a signal for a radio bomb explosion in Kharkov was sent from the Voronezh Radio Broadcasting Station, which was located more than 550 kilometers from the city.

For the first time in the world stories The Red Army used the existing radiofugals already 12 July 1941 of the year. Three radio-controlled landfills with a capacity of 250 kg of TNT each exploded in the village of Strugi Krasnye in the territory of the Pskov Region. Radio stations were installed by Red Army soldiers of a special mining company and blown up by a signal from a radio station located in 150 km from the site of the laying, after the enemy occupied the village. Two days later, aerial photography carried out by pilots confirmed that craters from explosions and piles of debris were left in the place of the buildings in which the radio fougues were installed.

The first truly large-scale mining with the use of F-10 radio mines was the mining of Vyborg, where 25 radiofoils were installed, which contained from 120 to 4500 kg of trotyl. Of these, 17 was blown up on 12 urban sites, and the Finnish military managed to neutralize and neutralize 8 when it became clear that the incoming radio signal leads to an explosion of mines. Found mines were sent for study in Helsinki, where they were studied with great interest by experts. Already by September 2 1941 of the year (the Finns entered Vyborg on August 29) relevant instructions were issued, which contained the rules for the circulation and neutralization of Soviet radio operators. In particular, it was indicated that prewar pause music melodies of Minsk and Kharkov broadcasting radio stations were used as radio signals (these melodies filled in the radio air between the broadcasts).


Khreshchatyk in Kiev after explosions and fires at the end of September 1941


To receive a control signal, the radio antenna had to be laid in a horizontal position or close to it and always in the direction from which the signal for undermining would come. It was not difficult to guess that in all cases the antenna was directed in a direction approximately to the east. That is why a very effective way of detecting installed radios was to dig a ditch about a meter deep around suspicious objects. This made it possible to detect a thirty-meter antenna, which was buried to a depth of 50-80, near the object. Both the Finns and the Germans later widely used prisoners of war for this operation. Obtained in Vyborg information Finns fairly quickly shared with the Germans. Perhaps this information allowed the Germans to quickly and correctly organize the fight against Soviet mines, controlled by radio. In Kharkov, the Germans were able to prevent the bombings of most of the radio-mounted radio sets in the city.

It should be noted that it was in Kharkov and the areas around the city that the use of object mines equipped with time-delay fuses gave significantly better results. For example, from the 315 object mines, which were installed on the railway and railway facilities by the 5 and 27 railway brigades, the Germans managed to detect all 37, and only 14 could neutralize them, and 23 they had to undermine on the spot. The rest of the mines worked according to their goals.

By itself, the idea of ​​controlling the detonation of mines with the help of radio signals justified itself, proving in practice the effectiveness of this method. However, the widespread use of such mines was possible only up to the moment when the enemy received in his hands valid samples, instructions and a description of the principles of their work. By the mid-to-late autumn of 1941, such mines were no longer a surprise for the Nazis and their allies. At the same time, the experience of combat use showed that radio mines have a serious drawback - they can be simply and securely blocked, and the limited duration of their combat work was also a minus. These mines had limited capabilities. Firstly, their effective combat use was possible as seldom as the enemy deemed it inappropriate to divert his radio equipment to constant radio reconnaissance and interception. Secondly, the short period of operation of radiofuse power sources (no more than 40 days) significantly limited the use of such a device in time.

Information sources:
http://kik-sssr.ru
http://army.armor.kiev.ua
https://vpk-news.ru
https://defendingrussia.ru
Open source materials
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    8 February 2019 15: 53
    The USSR began working on the creation of radio-explosive bombs long before the war. They began to be created in Ostekhbyuro, which was founded back in 1927. The work is led by specialist in explosions at a distance Vladimir Bekauri, also a great contribution to the creation of Soviet radio mines was made by Academician Vladimir Mitkevich.
    I read about Bekauri's works on radio control back in Soviet times, he had many works, not only radio mines, but for the first time he read about Academician Mitkevich's participation in these works. For the first time I saw the mine itself and its device. But what the Germans discovered disarmed so many mines, read and saw for the first time. In the books of Colonel Starinov, there are isolated cases of the discovery of these mines and the Germans managed to neutralize only one mine. The fact that the Germans produced such was also in print, EMNIP in the TM magazine, but it seemed to be unsuccessful.
    1. +2
      8 February 2019 20: 35
      Starinov is an excellent master of mine and sabotage business, but his memoirs are more than biased. Naturally, he wrote them at an advanced age. Therefore, it is not surprising that he wrote about the individual methods of detecting and demining these landmines by the Germans, which was, to put it mildly, far from the truth. Again, in his book, he seriously argued that the battle of Moscow could only be won with the help of sabotage groups. And the "rail war" of the summer of 1943 was also not considered by God.
      1. +1
        9 February 2019 01: 29
        Quote: Aviator_
        Again, in his book, he seriously argued that the battle of Moscow could only be won with the help of sabotage groups. And he did not put the "rail war" of the summer of 1943 into anything either.

        Well, here I always doubted, now I don’t remember who I read it, it seems from the same Starinov, perhaps from some of the "generals of the military industry", but there were not enough explosives even to equip ammunition. IMHO "Rail War" did not give the effect that was expected from it, but I can say that the technology of track repair for armored trains and armored train teams was worked out quite well during WWI and GW. Therefore, the track was repaired rather quickly. It was more difficult for the Germans at the beginning of the Second World War, when the Red Army used the "Worm" pute breaker and our railway troops, when, after 1943, the Germans began to use the "Hook" travel destroyer

        trip breaker.
        RDG and partisans could not possess this technique. https://masterok.livejournal.com/2420739.html
        https://topwar.ru/78092-putevye-razrushiteli-vtoroy-mirovoy-voyny-nemeckiy-kryuk.html
        1. +2
          9 February 2019 15: 13
          I read from Pokryshkin that he was hunting for such a "hook"
          1. 0
            9 February 2019 20: 06
            Pokryshkin destroyed similar equipment in the spring of 1944 in Crimea
        2. +1
          9 February 2019 20: 13
          It's not about explosives, they were used in large quantities and surrogate ones. The point is in trained qualified personnel, who were sorely lacking. "Rail War" is a large-scale project that was not needed someday, namely in the summer of 1943. Yes, knocked out half a meter of a rail with the help of a tolovoy checker - not God knows what sabotage. But the campaign did its part, perhaps not with the expected effect. Starinov was a narrow specialist, and nothing more.
          1. 0
            10 February 2019 03: 06
            Quote: Aviator_
            It's not about explosives, they were used in large quantities and surrogate. The point is trained qualified personnel, which were sorely lacking.
            Here I agree, but according to the recollections of partisan commanders: Vershigora, Fedorov Medvedev and others, the highly scarce explosives that were most often smelted and unexploded ordnance were not spent rationally and with great risk for demolition men. The Germans also understood the importance of railways in the USSR, especially already in the autumn thaw of 1941, and paid great attention to their protection. That is why sabotage on important infrastructure facilities of the railways was the most effective: bridges, water pumping stations, fuel depots, workshops and other facilities where the competent disabling of equipment interrupted train traffic for a long time. To prepare any operation, even not as large-scale as the "Rail War", requires time and resources, human and material. So it is better to spend them with greater effect than undermining one rail. It looks beautiful in the movies, as they show a rail war. It gave its effect, but later, when the Germans felt a deficit in the elements of the track, when they had to disassemble the secondary tracks.
            "Time Mine" https://topwar.ru/7315-pobediteli-mina-zamedlennogo-deystviya.html
            1. +2
              11 February 2019 15: 39
              It seems that Ponamorev was the initiator of the "rail war"? He interested Stalin, and then "off and on"
              1. 0
                11 February 2019 16: 11
                Quote: vladcub
                It seems that Ponamorev was the initiator of the "rail war"?

                HEAD OF THE CENTRAL STAFF OF THE PARTISAN MOVEMENT LIEUTENANT GENERAL P.K. PONOMARENKO: TOUCHES TO PORTRAIT
                Panteleimon Kondratievich Ponomarenko, Ukrainian, was born on July 27, 1902 into a peasant family in a Shelkovsky farm of the Kuban region, now the Belorechensky district of the Krasnodar Territory ....
                From June 1942 to February 1944, 6501 people were trained at five central schools of the Central School of Pedagogical Studies14. Cadres of various partisan specialists were trained both in stationary schools deployed in the republican and regional headquarters of the partisan movement, and in schools operating directly behind enemy lines in large partisan detachments. In total, over the years of the war, special schools trained about 40 thousand bombers, 5,6 thousand subversive instructors, 2,5 thousand radio operators and scouts, and 3,5 thousand commanders and chiefs of staff of partisan detachments15.
                http://history.milportal.ru/2017/07/nachalnik-centralnogo-shtaba-partizanskogo-dvizheniya-general-lejtenant-p-k-ponomarenko-shtrixi-k-portretu/
                1. +2
                  11 February 2019 16: 57
                  Thanks for the help
      2. +1
        9 February 2019 21: 43
        Quote: Aviator_
        Starinov is an excellent master of mine and sabotage business, but his memoirs are more than biased. Naturally, he wrote them at an advanced age. Therefore, it is not surprising that he wrote about the individual methods of detecting and demining these landmines by the Germans, which was, to put it mildly, far from the truth. Again, in his book, he seriously argued that the battle of Moscow could only be won with the help of sabotage groups. And the "rail war" of the summer of 1943 was also not considered by God.

        He didn’t put it quite logically, he argued that it was better to derail the train than to blow up the rails, which took 15 minutes to fix
        1. 0
          10 February 2019 09: 06
          It is logical from his narrow point of view. And where would he get the demolition personnel and equipment by this time? If in the case of the "Rail War" his point of view with reservations can be considered logical, then about the battle near Moscow - just nonsense.
    2. +1
      April 15 2019 14: 14
      An ambiguous opinion about the explosion of civilian buildings, but military and infrastructure facilities are justified.
  2. +1
    8 February 2019 21: 43
    I am not an expert, but a bookmark triggering signal could be sent point blank from specials. groups. Could not organize a dugout with a walkie-talkie and batteries not far from the object. I mean that the reception antenna in this case can be minimized. soldier
    1. +1
      9 February 2019 11: 02
      The radio equipment in those days was tube, heavy and fragile ... Moreover, the use of an underground antenna clearly requires long wavelength operation, which, in turn, requires long transmitting antennas and powerful heavy transmitters with powerful power ... So - could not. request
      1. 0
        9 February 2019 21: 11
        This refers to a short wave. Transmitter-receiver based on RPO-1 ... 4 My personal suggestion is whether it is possible to use a lightning rod, which is available in every building? Another suggestion is to stupidly use a wire (you can deeply bury it) and an electric detonator, for example, you can let the wire go along with conventional wiring. Offers from the couch - do not judge strictly.
        1. 0
          9 February 2019 21: 46
          Quote: cat Rusich
          This refers to a short wave. Transmitter-receiver based on RPO-1 ... 4 My personal suggestion is whether it is possible to use a lightning rod, which is available in every building? Another suggestion is to stupidly use a wire (you can deeply bury it) and an electric detonator, for example, you can let the wire go along with conventional wiring. Offers from the couch - do not judge strictly.

          You probably have little idea what happened to the city after its capture
  3. +3
    9 February 2019 15: 22
    I also read Starinov, and after him I got the opinion that almost all the fuses worked. Perhaps I read for a long time, but I had the opinion that such fuses were used: Kiev, Odessa and Kharkov, but I don’t remember Vyborg
    1. 0
      10 February 2019 09: 08
      For some reason, he did not write about Vyborg. Another theater - it was not there, but he did not generalize all the material.
  4. 0
    10 February 2019 16: 56
    Author:
    Yuferev Sergey
    At the same time, the experience of combat use showed that radio mines have a serious drawback - they can be easily and reliably blocked, and the limited term of their combat work was also a minus. These mines had limited use. Firstly, their effective combat use was as rare as the enemy considered it inappropriate to divert his available radio equipment to constant radio reconnaissance and interception.

    I think that the author did not quite correctly assess the essence of the issue, because these shortcomings were associated primarily with the linear dimensions of the receiving antennas and the dimensions of the receiving devices. If the USSR in the thirties took seriously the creation of radio stations in the VHF range, then it would be possible to significantly reduce the dimensions of the devices, and most importantly, remote detonation could be carried out from longer distances using aircraft VHF radios that would be equipped with devices for generating teams on detonation before departure.
    And no radio intelligence could do anything about it - this is a fact.
    Secondly, the short term of operation of the power sources of radio mines (no more than 40 days) significantly limited the use of such devices in time.

    This is a perfectly acceptable time, given the maneuver war, and taking into account how we retreated in 1941. After 40 days, the mining site might no longer have regular Wehrmacht units, and therefore an explosion would not have caused such harm.
    1. 0
      10 February 2019 17: 37
      Quote: ccsr
      Author:
      Yuferev Sergey
      At the same time, the experience of combat use showed that radio mines have a serious drawback - they can be easily and reliably blocked, and the limited term of their combat work was also a minus. These mines had limited use. Firstly, their effective combat use was as rare as the enemy considered it inappropriate to divert his available radio equipment to constant radio reconnaissance and interception.

      I think that the author did not quite correctly assess the essence of the issue, because these shortcomings were associated primarily with the linear dimensions of the receiving antennas and the dimensions of the receiving devices. If the USSR in the thirties took seriously the creation of radio stations in the VHF range, then it would be possible to significantly reduce the dimensions of the devices, and most importantly, remote detonation could be carried out from longer distances using aircraft VHF radios that would be equipped with devices for generating teams on detonation before departure.
      And no radio intelligence could do anything about it - this is a fact.
      Secondly, the short term of operation of the power sources of radio mines (no more than 40 days) significantly limited the use of such devices in time.

      This is a perfectly acceptable time, given the maneuver war, and taking into account how we retreated in 1941. After 40 days, the mining site might no longer have regular Wehrmacht units, and therefore an explosion would not have caused such harm.

      If the Internet does not lie, the Reality of the 80s, the Hunt of the 70s were generally calculated for 30 days.