Evgeny Fedorov: "Russian business on the hook of the USA"

67
Evgeny Fedorov, a deputy of the State Duma of four convocations, the former chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, a member of the general council of the United Russia party, visited the Pravdy.Ru video studio. In the Club of the chief editor of Inna Novikova, the politician spoke about the main problems of our economy and ways to solve it.

- Yevgeny Alekseevich, you were removed from the post of chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, deprived of the right to speak in the media because of your position on Russia's political and economic sovereignty. Why is your point of view so unpopular?

- I am generally forbidden to discuss issues of sovereignty. Real problems are little discussed here, because it is not customary to discuss the laws of politics, to talk seriously about life. A serious analysis is not allowed into the information space.

In 1991, one side was defeated against the other. The Soviet Union lost the war, because the enemy studied us well and applied the operation to promote his agent Gorbachev, who in six years managed to create a mechanism to eliminate the country.

We lost in the 40-year war, which for some reason is called "cold." And today, our state apparatus is partially subject to the winner, that is, America. We pay tribute to them, and they control us completely.

- What tribute are you talking about? Give an example, please.

- Look at any Russian banknote, it says: “Ticket of the Bank of Russia”. If you recall the old Soviet banknote, it was written on it: "State Treasury Ticket". That is, these papers are now issued not by the state of the Russian Federation, but by one particular bank. This is a consequence of the 1991 of the year to make it clear.

This piece of paper is issued on the basis of the Constitution and on the basis of laws on the Central Bank, and the volume of output is proportional, according to the Law on the Central Bank and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, to the amount of virtual foreign currency purchased through the mechanism of so-called gold reserves. That is, in order for me to pay in the 100 store in rubles, the Russian economy paid face value to the United States of America.

This money goes to the inflation mechanism, because it is withdrawn from the economy. And we will never solve the problem of inflation without solving the problem of the Central Bank. Do not think that this is our specific problem. America has won the majority of countries, and today they consume half of the world's GDP. And the Americans are well aware that this problem will destroy them. Therefore, the main question for Obama to Congress is to reduce America’s domestic consumption. This is a paradox, but they cannot do it, because you cannot get a piece that is already there out of the American mouth.

Thus, every year we pay tribute to the treasury of the United States - about 200-300 billions of dollars. It corresponds to the full taxation in Russia, without customs payments. Relatively speaking, every Russian pays two taxes: he pays one tax to the Russian budget, and the other - in the same amounts - he pays to the American budget. These rules came up with the Americans. The rules are written by the winners.

- You said that they "control us completely." How?

“Tribute is only one part.” The second is complete control of the business. In Russia, there is no national large and medium business. That is, in Russia in private business it is forbidden to have large objects, this is a ban of the winner. All private business in Russia, except for small and medium, is obliged to register in foreign jurisdiction, to be controlled by the United States. You will not name a single major Russian businessman who would be a Russian de jure businessman. The official status of any of them is "the property manager of a foreign company in the Russian Federation", although he may have a Russian passport.

- Is Norilsk Nickel a foreign company?

- Of course. Didn't you know? Even Gazprom at 40 percent is a foreign company. All companies in Russia, large and medium, do not have the right to exist as foreign property without registration, this rule has been established by Americans since the 1990-s.

- Where is it written? Who is it for execution?

- All it is carried out, you will not find any exception. As a businessman, you must travel to Gibraltar, Cyprus or London and transfer property there. We are forbidden to have national large private property. Did I say something new to you?

- Yes, I am surprised.

- They don’t even argue about it, because it’s obvious. Moreover, if you look from the perspective of 1991 of the year and the defeat of the country, you will see that the privatization mechanism was a form of indemnity: all privatized enterprises automatically transferred to foreign jurisdiction. Americans have entrusted many countries to own ownership mechanisms in the Russian Federation: France, England, Cyprus, Germany, etc.

- That is, enterprises should be registered there and taxes should be paid there?

- No, the enterprise itself may be in Russia, but its owner must be abroad. We have no national business in terms of ownership at all.

The exception is small and medium business. If you are a successful businessman and from stalls go to a more or less large object, your banker will tell you: "In whatever bank you are serviced, go to a foreign jurisdiction." And you, without going to a foreign jurisdiction, will not be able to have those relations with banks that you want.

By the way, the Central Bank of Russia is separated from the state, subject to the New York judicial jurisdiction. That is, he can sue the Russian government in New York. This is recorded in the law of the Central Bank. By the way, all the basic laws in Russia were written by Americans in the 1990s.

- And the State Duma also accepted you, including ...

- The State Duma accepted them. The control system, if you like, yoke or partial occupation is, first of all, a system. And it is controlled by the Americans through the financial mechanism, because Russia lacks national political money. That is, all parties sit differently on grants, or on salary, speaking Russian. If we are talking about opposition parties, they have a mixed system of control by the Americans: partly on a grant and partly manipulation through the mechanism of corruption and through the so-called mechanism of elites. If we are talking about the ruling authorities, then the very rules of their formation came up with the Americans.

- Evgeny Alekseevich, let's return to the question of business.

- Yes, there is a second point of this question. American advisers, who came to the Russian Federation to establish the Russian state apparatus after 1991, selected future oligarchs and distributed Soviet and post-Soviet property to them with a certain condition.

Therefore, if you ask me if today's large Russian businessmen are owners of a business that they do and say they are owners, I’ll say that I don’t know, but I suspect that many don’t . They say: "We are the owners," but in reality they are hooked.

- As, for example, for a long time they tried to find out who owns the Domodedovo airport ...

- This is just a small special case, and the state very quickly ran away from it, because they nabbed on his head and said: "Do not meddle here." Power is controlled through the mechanism of corruption, which is why corruption is an unsolvable problem today. To solve it, we were forbidden by the Americans.

- Tell us more about how the mechanism of corruption in Russia works?

- Imagine a big corruption. Before you take and give half the property of the USSR to someone, you just need to say: "Who are you? Doctor? You will be a billionaire." This is called "privatization." Maybe a big corruption? There are kickbacks, bribes. And when they take and just half of the country's property is distributed on the list, and according to the American ...

“But that was 20 years ago ...”

- Nothing has changed since then. This property as given, it is. This time. The second. An oligarchic management system when an official is appointed by a business and works for a business.

- In all countries, officials are appointed by the business and work for the business.

- They do not report. When the functional duty of an official is to serve his businessman, this is called regular corruption.

The current mechanism of corruption is compared to these two, baby talk, this mechanism goes into the system of government. This is the rule of the functioning of the Russian state, which arose in the 20 system years ago as a result of the 1991 capitulation of the year.

- You want to say that before 1991, we did not have corruption?

- It was, but of a different nature. The current goal of corruption is political, unlike tsarist Russia, where it bore a personal goal — to enrich the boyar, the official. Today, the mechanism of corruption is one of the mechanisms for manipulating the processes in Russia. That is why Americans can close corruption in Russia in two days, equating it to laundering. The system of corruption, all its technology, is tied to foreign jurisdiction, organized there. It is impossible to solve the problem of corruption in Russia without solving the problem of sovereignty.

Our state is half the occupation mechanism created by Americans in 1991. And when the state does something for me, it’s not a fact that it is patriotism. The state works easily for Americans when necessary, and they have their own mechanisms for that.

- And what do you, a politician with great experience, a deputy of four convocations, order you to do to your compatriots for your salvation, so to speak?

- Why do you think our ancestors did not want to lose the war and put their bellies in thousands of battles? Every normal person understands that if you lost the war, you, your children and great-grandchildren will pay for it for a long time. The winner has a mechanism for influencing any processes in a defeated country. The losing state has a lot of time and energy to spend on restoring sovereignty, economy, statehood, culture.

Let's see the logic of events. 1991 year - a loss in the war. The Americans arrived, they created the Russian state, for some time they directly controlled it. Kozyrev, Gaidar were just figures covering the American government, which worked in Moscow through a system of advisers.

They chose the oligarchs, gave them property, transferred the property to their jurisdiction for reliability, and created a seven banker mechanism from 1996. The oligarch directly ruled the officials through the quota mechanism: ministers, department heads, directors of large state-owned companies were subordinate to him. They reported to him weekly, and he could remove them from office at any time. This oligarchic mechanism existed until 1999, before Putin destroyed it.

Putin launched the mechanism of a partial national revival, or, I would say, liberation. But the management system is such that if one link, the president, for example, goes out of American control, it does not change. Even if Putin can go against the Americans, and he talked about this, then he cannot go against the elite of his country. The strength of Americans in Russia is that in 20 years, the Russian elites have become American. In reality, the country is governed by Russian non-national elites.

I will not say that the Americans want to liquidate Russia, but some of their bosses made such a decision, they viewed the world while the Russian Federation was liquidated.

- You do not have paranoia that Americans control everything, all our actions and conversations are controlled? How much information they will have to process.

- I agree with you that they do not process it, but they write, therefore the National Security Agency has a budget twice as much as the CIA.

There are claims to the current government that it pays too much attention to Chechnya: they say that no other region is as funded as the Chechen Republic is funded.

- Do you know which region of Russia receives the most federal funding per resident? Kuril ridge. Under the federal program, they receive thirty times more money than funding per capita in Chechnya, for example. And Chechnya, in terms of calculated indicators, is funded on average, like the rest of the Caucasus. And the Caucasus is not the most funded, if we speak per capita, region of the Russian Federation.

In Chechnya, there is more sovereignty, they steal less, that's all. Efficiency is higher.

- It turns out that in the rest of Russia they steal in such a way that all regions live in poverty. And where does the stolen go? Is everything floating abroad?

“We recently discussed the mechanism of Russian grants that Medvedev introduced. Russian authorities should also allocate grants. And we asked the ministry how these grants are spent. Very interesting. Seventy percent of our national grants go to grantees from the United States of America ... We asked: "Why seventy?" We were told at the ministry: "And in order to show the whole world that we, too, can finance American grantees." That is, for the government system, this goal is important. The Russian state apparatus was created as an external administration architecture, and the fact that our president takes a different position, that there are a bunch of decent officials, does not change the system.

- And the State Duma is also one of the elements?

- The State Duma is a party system. The party system is part through the grantees, with respect to part of the opposition, part through the corruption mechanisms of manipulation and part through the elite manipulation. And besides, you do not forget, there is a mechanism of common pressure, when people understand that it is pointless to argue with the system: you go against the rules, they crush you, they throw it away.

We need to win over the Russian information space, that is, to enact laws on the national rating system, on the media self-regulation system, that is, to solve the problem of the well-being of the Russian person. In this information space, we will not solve the problem, it destroys us.

- Not so long ago there was a discussion on Facebook that it was necessary to ban foreign citizens from being leaders of the Russian media. There was such indignation: "How will foreigners not enter the leadership of the media? This is impossible, this is a restriction of freedom!"

- We must clearly understand: the sphere of ideologies and the sphere of rules is not the sphere of Russian sovereignty in the understanding of Americans. For violations in these matters will be the bombing, the Hague Tribunal, up to the special squad of murderers. The struggle in this area will be to the death of America.

Central channels directly obey Washington. The budget of America pledged money to manage the Russian media.

In my opinion, we have a lot of strength despite this powerful system. But this process is not fast. We must clearly understand: first, the resources of vassal-colonial growth have been exhausted, that is, we will not be given a higher standard of living. Secondly, in the last three or four years we have a total retreat of national forces on all fronts. This is due to the fact that the Americans forbade Putin to go for a third term at one time, and the events that followed. In fact, they seized the initiative of ruling Russia. There was a rise, by the way, thanks to this there was a tenfold increase in salaries, when he partially took over the management of national processes. Then the reaction started, and for four years we have been in a state of retreat.

For the past six months, we have been running from all national fronts under pressure from the Americans. For example, the Swamp area. Who are the organizers? More than half are official US grantees.

When I spoke with Obama, his team, they said bluntly: "We underestimated Russia, we will now take it seriously." Seriously, it means that more money will be allocated for oppositional work in Russia. We are seeing it now. The United States budget is being made up for propaganda spending in Russia, and Hillary Clinton calls this money publicly in Congress "money for a war with Russia." This war, as she says, there are no victories in it, there is a struggle in it.

Today, Putin’s main task is, of course, on the basis of popular support, to come to an agreement with the elites, and by and large, replace them. When he talks about modernization and changing the type of economy, he actually talks about the mechanism of transformation of elites into a national type.

- But you said that we have all enterprises registered in the West. How can he change that?

- Changing the type of economy means changing the legislation of Russia in such a way so that we can get national mechanisms for influencing the situation, integration into Russian society. That there were not foreign businessmen, but Russian ones, so that the ruble was not foreign currency (the same branch of the dollar, to be honest), and the Russian one, so that television was not foreign, but Russian.

Imagine that tomorrow the material well-being of Russian citizens miraculously doubled. Do you think something will change in relations with the authorities? Not. The problem is not money. The problem is that in Russia there is no sovereignty and people feel this with the spinal cord. Our state system works for a state called the USA. He created and works for him.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    14 June 2012 08: 05
    The whole world is under US control. The dollar is a threat to the world community. And if we enter the WTO, it will be much worse.
    1. 755962
      +2
      14 June 2012 16: 14
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      will be much worse.

  2. +10
    14 June 2012 08: 13
    It’s sad, but it seems to be true .. ((
    1. +7
      14 June 2012 10: 50
      It doesn't "seem to be true." This is the truth.

      I would not be surprised if in a day or two the article and the author are disavowed.

      I understand that progress is not made at one point.
      But, it would be great ... if the President at one point, say June 12, 2013, said to the whole country - the ruble becomes the state paper of the Russian Federation, Russia ceases to look back across the ocean.
      There would be an upsurge. It would definitely be. Yes, and the day of June 12 would be a full-fledged holiday.

      Here, at the same time, it dawned on me - and if the article is not subjected to rout, yes, plus others will appear - this will already say a lot.
      1. +3
        14 June 2012 12: 24
        Build more guns and planes, I think then he will say so
        the ruble becomes a government paper of the Russian Federation, Russia ceases to look around-across the ocean
  3. party3AH
    +14
    14 June 2012 08: 28
    - Is Norilsk Nickel a foreign company?

    - Of course. Didn't you know? Even Gazprom at 40 percent is a foreign company. All companies in Russia, large and medium, do not have the right to exist as foreign property without registration, this rule has been established by Americans since the 1990-s.

    In May, again, there was an article about the privatization of state-owned enterprises, i.e. do we want to swallow this hook deeper?
    It is necessary to get out of the influence of the State Department, nationalize enterprises, corporations, media groups, let the gentlemen grab the hearts of the senators. If Putin does not dare to go against the elite, it is necessary to support him "mere mortals" in this struggle.
    1. +2
      14 June 2012 13: 09
      Putin needs support from below to fight privatization.
      1. wall
        +1
        14 June 2012 17: 01
        Where does this information come from? Did he tell you that personally? Why then privatize?
      2. kuzmich
        +2
        14 June 2012 19: 35
        I think if there wasn’t a positive image of the Way in this article, then it wouldn’t have existed at all. It’s just that, Putting the winners forward, fussing about the liberal opposition to the Way is nothing but another circus. In general, the article is true, I’ll add that the article covered up the word Zion with the word USA. Well, in principle, also for quite understandable reasons. I also want to urge all Slavs to give up poisoning themselves with tobacco shit, and finally remember who we really are. Honor I have!
        1. +1
          22 June 2012 21: 11
          If everyone abandons themselves to poison the shit, I think the country will really change even in a year !!!
  4. +7
    14 June 2012 08: 39
    Why such confidence in the current leaders? I do not think that since the time of Gorbachev the mechanisms of manipulation have become worse. It is believed that they were only improving and the current authorities are even worse than the Gorbachev ...
  5. +6
    14 June 2012 08: 58
    In order to agree with the elite before, Bolotnikov needs to be dispersed, despite the cries and protests of the West. If the United States openly declares financing for white bellies in Russia, there should be no talk of any loyalty to them. As for the interview itself, a lot of problems were revealed, but specific steps to solve them were not indicated
    1. speedy
      +8
      14 June 2012 16: 21
      Tersky,
      And it just seems to me that the article appeared for a reason, they don't shoot at idle people with such things, and a search at Sobchak and Co. - the beginning of serious work on the topic of "Sovereignty". We really have a problem with the elite - the business and media elite are mostly foreign to Russia, not to mention the banking sector. V.V. we need support in the struggle for a better life for Russia, we need support from below, we need an impulse - social. order to the authorities to restore order. To throw off the IGO it is necessary to realize, feel, understand that it is impossible to live like this for longer and to act like that, a single emotional impulse is needed, as before the Kulikovo battle. Putin must get support from below in this matter, because the IGO itself will not perish, must get rid of the Baskaks, sweep away sedition and treason, and reunite the Triune Russia. The disease was opened, the diagnosis was made - therapy is ahead.
      1. KamikadZzzE
        +1
        14 June 2012 17: 23
        speedy,
        Putin received support in the elections. The business is now up to him. Will we wait, as we in the infantry said, time "H"?
  6. NUT
    NUT
    +6
    14 June 2012 09: 07
    all as written:
    "... And only a few, very few will guess or even understand what is happening. But we will put such people in a helpless position, turn them into a laughing stock, find a way to slander them and declare them to be the scum of society ..."

    - Evgeny Alekseevich, you were removed from the post of chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, deprived of the right to speak in the media because of your position on the political and economic sovereignty of Russia. your What is your point of view so unpopular
    - I am generally forbidden to discuss issues of sovereignty.


    Sheep are also forbidden to discuss the question - why does the owner need such a sharp knife
  7. Trudy
    +7
    14 June 2012 09: 30
    After Gorbachev surrendered Russia, Putin has a hard time. It is necessary to break the whole system debugged by the Americans. Will he be able to do this during his term as president?
    The article makes a depressing impression. I just want to say in the words of the movie hero: "Chef, the truncated is gone! The plaster is removed, the client is leaving!"
    1. wall
      +4
      14 June 2012 11: 21
      Are you sure that Putin is doing something? This is more and more reminiscent of polishing rather than remaking the system. He simply did so that the people would live a little easier, so that they would not die all ahead of time, and the essence would not change. The rules still work. Take off the pink glasses. Unpleasant - but useful.
      1. +6
        14 June 2012 12: 40
        Quote: wall
        Are you sure that Putin is doing something? This is more and more reminiscent of polishing rather than remaking the system. He simply did so that the people would live a little easier, so that they would not die all ahead of time, and the essence would not change. The rules still work. Take off the pink glasses. Unpleasant - but useful

        - doesn’t do anything in domestic politics. At the moment, judging by the movements, it is more engaged in Syria, which is justified. There is a fire dangerous for Russia.
        In domestic politics, there were attempts on his part, but all unsuccessful. So, he twice tried to subordinate the Central Bank to the Government of Russia. Both times, the State Duma deputies unanimously (!), Which leads to sad reflections, rolled this bill. Then Putin spat and tried to make an analogue of the Central Bank from VTB, but either because of sabotage, or because of Kostin's non-high professional level, or because of the skillful opposition of international and Russian pro-American financial organizations, or maybe because of everything together, most likely, the idea failed miserably. Do you remember this scandal with VTB shares. Alas, Putin is not God, no one here writes about his omnipotence. There are "eye openers" who do not even have military service behind their backs, and sorry, the milk on their lips has not dried yet, but already with arrogance they "open my eyes that Putin has been in power for 12 years, but still" fucked up all the polymers ". They have no idea about the functioning of such complex systems, they still think that a good father-king (Ivashov, Zyuganov, Udaltsov, there are already options) will come, wave a magic wand and then everything will fall into place. I, for example, do not against Ivashov, but he does not have a magic wand and does not have the same political capital, authority and trust that Putin currently possesses.And how to reorganize the Central Bank without the permission of the State Duma? Enter into a conflict with it and arrange a new execution of the White House, as is already It was?
        There is no need to indicate about pink glasses - we walk without them and we can see everything perfectly. Unfortunately, not only the national liberation movement has evolved. The means and methods of COLONIZATION OF COUNTRIES also made great progress in evolution and became sophisticated. So they are also non-violent in nature, you can’t even see right away, and when you see it, you won’t eliminate it with clumsy methods, only complicate everything. Fight fire with fire. The sophisticated forms of colonization must be answered with the same sophisticated forms of the national liberation movement. Just advise you to remove the pink glasses.
        1. wall
          0
          14 June 2012 13: 23
          Time will judge us. I will not argue with you. We'll find out soon.
        2. Trudy
          -1
          14 June 2012 13: 34
          Aksakal, you have very well developed the question. I have the same opinion. Thank.
        3. +3
          14 June 2012 14: 53
          Quote: aksakal
          Then Putin spat and tried to make an analogue of the Central Bank of VTB


          An analogue of the Central Bank, Putin made from VEB, and VTB was supposed to become an understudy for Sberbank.

          Quote: aksakal
          In domestic politics there were attempts on his part, but all failed


          That is why I am against Putin, he is constantly trying to do something, but someone and something is constantly interfering with him, for 12 years now. Putin is weak and cowardly, in 12 years it was possible to grow up his own elite and finally get rid of the "occupational" elite, nationalize the Central Bank, carry out real reforms and start a new industrialization.
          1. speedy
            +4
            14 June 2012 18: 07
            saruman,
            You are so determined, Saruman, but imagine: you are a simple shopkeeper and do not want to pay to the gang that controls your entire city. You can send them to ..., you can join the battle, but you have a family, small children, business, finally, what will you do? The Russian princes paid tribute for a century and a half, went for labels, and meanwhile they themselves were saving up strength for Paul Kulikov, and that did not immediately burn out, but the people of Suzdal, Tverichi, Belozertsi went to the Don with Dimitri, and the Russian people returned. "Russia is concentrating."
            1. Trudy
              +1
              14 June 2012 18: 26
              +! Stoppot! (Soon)
              And I also want to remind saruman: quickly only rabbits breed. Something like that.
            2. +2
              14 June 2012 21: 47
              The Russian princes paid tribute for a century and a half, went for labels, and meanwhile they themselves were saving up strength for Paul Kulikov, and that did not immediately burn out, but the people of Suzdal, Tverichi, Belozertsi went to the Don with Dimitri, and the Russian people returned. "Russia is concentrating."

              The princes did not have Project 941 SSBNs with 20 R-39 SLBMs, Project 667 BRDM with 16 R-29RM or R-29RMU2 SLBMs, did not have Molodets and Topol_M mobile complexes, did not have the same R-36M2 "Voevoda" (aka Satan), there were no 20 tanks. What do you think, if the Russian princes had all of the above, they would pay tribute?
            3. 0
              15 June 2012 11: 49
              Quote: short-term
              You are a simple shopkeeper and do not want to pay a gang that controls your entire city. You can send them to ..., you can join the battle, but you have a family, small children, business, finally, what do you do?


              Putin is not a simple shopkeeper. Putin had and has significant support from ordinary citizens. For 12 years, it was possible to attract an active part of citizens to a real cause and get support not only in opinion polls and in elections. I could get real support and strength to solve the problems mentioned in the article. Here are just some of Putin’s policy failures and missed opportunities, in short:
              1. Small and medium business as a whole does not support Putin, because he has not received real support, but only has constant problems. Nothing positive has been done in this direction. Loss of support is very active, not poor, and quite intellectual part of citizens.
              2. Putin paid a lot of attention to the "vertical of power", strengthening the bureaucratic class. BUT! The class of officials is an amorphous parasite that will lick the ass of any president, as long as they are not touched. Now it is a serious brake on the development of Russia.
              3. The Ministry of Internal Affairs is a corporation in itself, it was made by Putin, not Yeltsin. Since at the turn of the beginning of 2000, a significant number of professionals and statesmen remained at the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who initially welcomed the presidency of Putin, including myself. Then, they realized that nothing changes and it only gets worse. Putin could well stop the process of turning the Ministry of Internal Affairs into a closed corporation and rely on the strongest structure at that moment. The narrowness of GB thinking! The reform of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Medvedev was 12 years late, therefore, in the current realities it has zero efficiency.
              4. The army at that moment in complete collapse. But Putin could personally nominate military generals and senior officers (who were raised by the second Chechen war, essentially the Putin war) to all command posts of the Moscow Region and the General Staff, rather than squeezing them out of the army into governors. I would get the support of the army.
          2. +1
            14 June 2012 19: 14
            Comrade Saruman ...
            the question is ... at what age did Lenin fulfill his dream of taking power?
            How old was he going before her?
            Given the wild patriarchy of that era. Ignorance. Inability to count moves.
            NOT FUNDABILITY of any activity.
            There was one such ... from the Swamps ... merchant Savva Morozov.
            He financed the party (parties) of the socialists, including Leninists.
            Do we know a lot about him?
            There are one sentence about him in history books. Helped, sympathized.

            And in psychiatry there is such a thing - a suicidal attitude.
            When you really want to jump from a height.
            I also want to. Every time I find myself at an altitude (radio towers of 70 m) I really want to step. There. Into emptiness. For some reason, I believe that right now the air will support me.
            But, nevertheless, I am writing here.

            And so it goes.
            I'd like ... but not yet.
            To step is death.
            12 years ....... and from 1985 to 2000 - fifteen.

            At least I really want to hope so.
  8. +5
    14 June 2012 09: 31
    I wanted to clean something with a gun.
    1. +7
      14 June 2012 09: 40
      It was necessary to clean it in 90 — before going to a referendum on the Union.
      1. +8
        14 June 2012 10: 08
        I was small then and had no guns.
        1. +4
          14 June 2012 12: 41
          Good to you, Alexander.
          So your conscience is clear.
  9. welder
    -3
    14 June 2012 09: 45
    Well, here's the performance !!! Interestingly, reading our comments here, someone, laughs not moget ""

    yes Nooo ..... THROW-definitely ...)))))
  10. -3
    14 June 2012 09: 55
    Again half the truth !!!
    Quote: Trudy
    After Gorbachev surrendered Russia,

    But is Gorbachev? Maybe Yeltsin?
    It’s fashionable to scold Gorbachev, but if you look at the economies of the late and mid-80s, heaps of production cooperatives existed, the external and internal relations of the economy were not liquidated, there was a huge sales market, and practically no foreign goods arrived. There was a gradual modernization of enterprises .... Then Gorbachev tried to get away from oil dependence! Yes, there were systemic miscalculations, but in general the country's economy worked ... and the USSR still existed!
    But then, with the advent of Yeltsin, it all started!


    In 1991, one side was defeated against the other. The Soviet Union lost the war, because the enemy studied us well and applied the operation to promote his agent Gorbachev, who in six years managed to create a mechanism to eliminate the country.

    We lost in the 40-year war, which for some reason is called "cold." And today, our state apparatus is partially subject to the winner, that is, America. We pay tribute to them, and they control us completely.

    Or maybe the author and the interlocutor of the author, on the contrary, are pro-Americans? How so? Do we all obey America? Are we all sold to America? What then is the current policy?

    Or maybe we recall that the unloved by Chubais + a famous team with Gaidar took huge loans? Which managed to pay only in the 2000s ????
    Or maybe we’ll also recall that the USA intentionally collapsed the oil rate from the 70s to the 90s

    Regarding multinational companies - unfortunately true. But excuse me, how do you want? In the 90s, Yeltsin's team, pursuing its "economic policy", did not at all explain to the financially illiterate population what everything was done for and what privatization was - MMM, Khopry, etc. - here is a direct confirmation.

    And remember, recently even Putin admitted that the privatization of the 90s was carried out hastily and with huge violations, in which no one will delve now.

    CONCLUSION: stop feeding people with fables and half-truths, enough to powder our brains! Pro-Americans go to America - you will be welcome there.

    ps / In many countries of the world, national wealth is nationalized, but if we want to nationalize it back, we will have to organize a tough revolution, because about the Westerners they will not allow a legal solution to the situation
    1. +1
      14 June 2012 12: 48
      Quote: Hamul
      Again half the truth !!!

      - I agree. The article has a lot of controversial points.
      Quote: Hamul
      Then Gorbachev was trying to get away from oil addiction! Yes, there were systemic miscalculations, but in general the country's economy worked ... and the USSR still existed!
      But then, with the advent of Yeltsin, it all started!

      - I agree here too. Gorby is not guilty of having ruined the USSR by malice, but of being prohibitively weak for this kind of work. There is nothing in these cases to take on tugs, if not a dozen at all !!!! am And this does not in the least diminish his guilt and is not even a mitigating circumstance. And given our mentality, in Russia they never loved the weak, then weakness is even an aggravating circumstance. EBN was simply eager for power, and for power at any cost, even at the cost of the collapse of a mighty power. I hope that history will give him a well-deserved place.
  11. Fox 070
    +5
    14 June 2012 10: 02
    We need to start a company to nationalize all previously sold assets, especially in the primary sector of the economy. This will seriously hit the very foundation of the modern Russian oligarchy and will signal that Russia is ready to gain genuine independence.
    1. Born in USSR
      +8
      14 June 2012 11: 21
      We must start with the army, so that there is something to defend ourselves, otherwise we will be crushed! Then return to the state control over the media (so as not to lose the battle for the minds) then control over the ruble (privatize the central bank), return assets from offshore, at this point, if there are enough forces to put into practice, the oligarchy and bureaucrats (our modern elite) themselves will run west.
    2. schonia06rus
      +3
      14 June 2012 17: 47
      ololo see how an illiterate father of two and a "real" colonel in his repertoire! your dear vladimr vladimirovich (naturally putting it on you, and you don’t mind) announced that russia would start toАnew company privatization just the raw materials sector and a little defense -
      This expanded list, which was approved by Medvedev last summer, provides for the complete withdrawal of the state by 2017 from the capital of Rosneft, RusHydro, Zarubezhneft, Inter RAO UES, ALROSA, Rosselkhozbank, Rosagroleasing, OZK , Aeroflot. It is planned to reduce the state share in USC and UAC to 50%. In addition, according to preliminary plans, stakes in FGC, Transneft, Russian Railways and Uralvagonzavod may be sold until 2016, as a result of which the state's participation in their capital will be reduced to 75%. http://ria.ru/economy/20120607/667200703.html
      so comrade colonel you did not understand the general line fool
      PS we mean Medvedev - umbilical
  12. +6
    14 June 2012 10: 12
    EBNu in the grave aspen count. And the entire 90's government is on trial. Remember, the name of Chubais has been a household name recently, and now they seem to have forgotten about it. Beautifully merged reptile.
    Article plus, E. Fedorov Respect. It turns out that there are still people in EdR and the Duma who are rooting for Russia.
    1. Trudy
      +4
      14 June 2012 10: 51
      Remember, the name of Chubais has been a household name recently, and now they seem to have forgotten about it. Beautifully merged reptile.


      Speaking of Chubais.

      At the meeting of the Bilderberg Club, further unrest is planned for Russia.

      The annual secret conference of the Bilderberg Group, which brings together the powerful from the world of finance, business, politics and the media, was held this year in Chantilly, Virginia
      At a meeting of bilderbergs this year, three guests from Russia took part. However, unlike those in the establishment of such Western countries as the United States, Britain, Germany, France and Canada, two of the three Russians represented the opposition to Vladimir Putin. Anatoly Chubais and Garry Kasparov, the leading anti-Putin Russian politicians, attended the Bilderberg 2012 conference.
      ***********
      Most Russians scolded Chubais for his rampant privatization of Soviet and Russian state entities under President Boris Yeltsin and Prime Minister Chernomyrdin. The main beneficiaries of privatization were a handful of Russian entrepreneurs who soon became billionaire oligarchs. Many of these oligarchs soon found themselves either in prison or in exile in Britain and Israel to avoid criminal prosecution in Russia. Today Chubais is the head of the leading Russian nanotechnology company, Rusnano.
      ************
      Chubais also met with US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul. McFaul, like a number of new generation American ambassadors, has the habit of rudely interfering in the internal affairs of the country in which he is located. After one recent meeting with Chubais, McFaul publicly complained that NTV journalists were waiting for him after the meeting.
      ************
      The leader of the United Civil Front of Russia Kasparov, together with his colleague Boris Nemtsov, are the leading members of the Russian opposition to Putin. Moreover, Nemtsov is an old political ally of Chubais. Chubais, Kasparov and Nemtsov represent the political ideology of the "neoliberals", which is supported by such currency and stock speculators as George Soros. The neoliberals, if they could come to power in Russia, would transform Russia, making it completely dependent on the dictatorship and vagaries of the financial elites of New York, London and Frankfurt.
      ***************
      Although Russia, of course, was on the agenda for this year’s Bilderberg Club meeting, as evidenced by the presence of two figures of the Russian opposition at the meeting, it was not the only country targeted by secret global rulers. Bashar al Assad has also been on the hit list of the Bilder Bergers.
      http://mixednews.ru/archives/19022
      The true story and plans of the Bilderberg Club:
      http://mixednews.ru/archives/133
  13. +4
    14 June 2012 10: 41
    The article is informative, but I would say it’s not on the hook, but in the property, it’s clear that our oligarchs-thickstosums are zits presidents and you don’t notice any awkward movement, but the system will not help nationalization.
  14. scrack
    +2
    14 June 2012 11: 02
    First, the Central Bank must be liquidated, its functions transferred to the Treasury. Then you need to overtake oligarchic money in Russia
    1. wall
      +2
      14 June 2012 11: 24
      Get started today!
      1. scrack
        0
        14 June 2012 20: 34
        Would give power - would do
  15. PatriotizTAT
    +1
    14 June 2012 11: 11
    For me, Putin is not far gone ... from all this !!!
  16. khoma nickson
    +1
    14 June 2012 11: 20
    You will not say anything - it is famously written. And in EdR there are, it turns out, thinking people. Now it’s clear where we got such roads from, decaying drunkenness, math-remat on the streets and mountains of garbage. Interesting, and who craped us before the discovery of America and the formation of the USA? Englishwoman, Lithuania and Poland, Teutons? Indeed, anti-Americanism is becoming almost a national idea.
  17. +1
    14 June 2012 11: 41
    The article without controversial evokes discouragement and dismay. But there are still pluses - the fact that the Financial Monsters are so worried (I do not write specifically for the United States, since they are the same puppets in the hands of gray cardinals), and recognize the seriousness of the situation with Russia (read control). Says that something went wrong with them, the car crashed stalled. And this can not but rejoice. But it is not realistic to take radical measures immediately (such as nationalizing production and reviving the treasury), Putin is not a wizard, and even if he were a monarch and usurped power, he still couldn’t change much at once. Rather, they would not have let him do it. That, in principle, we are now observing.
  18. Ilyich
    +5
    14 June 2012 12: 05
    Vonanak, Mikhalych. And I think: why does capital constantly float offshore ... And I get some incomprehensible answers. That "businessmen do not feel stability" (yeah. How ... do not. So Shell, British petroleum, Opel feel, but they do not feel). Then "this is stolen money" (and what, nafik, is the difference if they are already legalized and are in the accounts?). Etc. and so on .. In general - always some kind of nonsense.
    And here the explanation is very simple and very similar to the truth. It turns out that this is part of the occupation regime. That's disgusting. Well, tell me, friends: well, how can these "winners" then be taken calmly, eh?
  19. +1
    14 June 2012 13: 12
    In my opinion complete nonsense. I have not heard any evidence or concrete examples. In different ways, it was repeated about money in offshore companies and that large enterprises are partially owned by foreigners. The same can be written about the USA itself, so there in general, the land also belongs to foreigners.
    There is no logic in the article. The author simply rushes to the extreme, brings to the absurdity our normal fears about the Americans. He plays on the feelings of people who are tired of the fact that the United States is trying by all means to rule another world.
    Learn is another way of information warfare - bringing of truth to the point of absurdity. The usual satanic move. For example: a parent loves his child and this is good and right. But is incest good? Incest is the same perverted "love" brought to the point of absurdity. Forgive me for this nasty example. Pedophilia is another "good feeling of love for children" brought to the point of absurdity.
    Here, in the article, our dislike for the omnipotence of Americans is brought to the point of absurdity.
    What for? It seems to me - to create fears and distrust of the government.
    Russia needs stability. But a stable Russia does not need the West. Hence the 1917 revolution. Hence the whole satanic Sabbath of the orange, NATO, Natsik, homosexual, human rights defenders, intelligentsia, etc. around us. These children will also not write such stories to you. so that we’re scared to live.
    1. Ilyich
      +1
      14 June 2012 13: 31
      But you must admit, the version is pretty slim. And reality is inscribed in it well. You are right that there is little evidence: you need to verify the data, you cannot trust any of the politicians.
      1. +1
        14 June 2012 17: 43
        Quote: Ilyich
        the version is pretty slim

        The most slender version of schizophrenics.
        You will not refute!
        Here are just a reference point sometimes taken from nowhere.
        Specifically, according to the article: Why is Russia proper as a state not yet connected to the USA?
        I think now right now , a referendum on this issue would give interesting results!
        bully
        1. Ilyich
          0
          14 June 2012 17: 59
          Quote: Cynic
          The most slender version of schizophrenics.
          You will not refute!

          It is truth too...
          Quote: Cynic
          a referendum on this issue would give interesting results!

          In which country?
          1. 0
            14 June 2012 18: 57
            Quote: Ilyich
            In which country?

            Guess three times!
            For some reason everyone believes that they live in different states.
            Yeah.
            Here a couple of generations will be replaced, then our descendants will be able to talk about different states.
            Now these are just different faces of the many-sided Janus.
            bully
    2. -2
      14 June 2012 16: 23
      I also think that everything is greatly exaggerated.
      The fact that some enterprises belong to foreigners, so we all know perfectly well that the main thing - who directly manages this company - he has the ability to steal and determine the whole policy.
      Those enterprises that were managed by foreigners went bankrupt in the 90s long ago (for this they were bought in order to destroy them), and those that did not go bankrupt are managed by some local people who do not want to go bankrupt.
      Natural selection against the plague.
      1. rate 60
        +4
        14 June 2012 18: 22
        Evgeny Fedorov, deputy of the State Duma of four convocations, former chairman of the Committee on Economic Policy and Entrepreneurship, member of the General Council of the United Russia party Andrei K Do you want to say that this prominent functionary Edra does not have information and writes bullshit? Yes, he is constantly on TV at all talk show defended this power.
      2. +3
        14 June 2012 18: 36
        For Andrey_K ...
        Large enterprises are managed by the Board of Directors.
        All these CEOs are just managers.
        They are also called - top managers.
        Each such type-top-manager is only responsible for fulfilling the budget and ensuring that there are no violations of the law (ecology there, safety measures).
        He doesn’t decide anything personally. Solves SD. He is only a start-up (who knows the functions of a start-up), he is a chain dog on guard of the interests of the owners.
        If, for example, he allows a steady decline in stock prices of his company - bye, Moscow, bye, meet the Trans-Baikal summer.
        This is at best. About the worst - I will not. Everyone has enough imagination.
        As it happened, I work in such a giant raw materials-trader, and I know very well who is on the Council.
        Frankly, it’s sad to look at this list.
        So, the article is not a stuffing.
        This article surprises me.
        And in order to understand what's what, some time is needed.
        As the saying goes, the first bell rang.
        Let's wait for the second.
  20. 0
    14 June 2012 16: 58
    Very controversial article. Especially when you consider the passages about the Central Bank of Russia. But it’s interesting to read about offshore. There is something to agree with. Here is an addition for anyone interested:
    http://forum.polismi.org/index.php?/topic/662-%D1%8D%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%8B-%D1
    %80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BE%D1%84%D1%84%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%
    80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9-%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B
    A% D0% B8 / page__pid__16519 # entry16519
  21. patriot2
    +3
    14 June 2012 17: 13
    E. Fedorov boldly told everything so that one wants to not believe in it. Apparently it was crippled.
    The fact that Russia is in the web of states and so it is clear, here's how to get out now?
    Still from the story Trudy I realized that our "opposition" in the person of the leaders is also on the salaries of the Bildermen. Oh, how difficult it is. Clans against clans. It's sad.
  22. malera
    -1
    14 June 2012 18: 26
    Quote: Tersky
    In order to agree with the elite before, Bolotnikov needs to be dispersed, despite the cries and protests of the West.

    Swamp appeared this year.
    Who prevented 12 years before agreeing.

    Quote: Magadan
    Russia needs stability. But a stable Russia does not need the West. Hence the revolution of 1917.

    Well, you taught history poorly. The revolution was due to the fact that the king was weak-willed and not decisive of reform. Stability is good only in development. The country stopped in development (and Russia stopped - none of the internal problems has been resolved, housing, food security, education, judicial reform, police reform, and much more) -cover country. Friendly and unfriendly countries will trample.
    1. +4
      14 June 2012 19: 01
      Hee hee ...
      The USSR under "dear Gorby", since 1985, where did it develop - cooperatives, consensus, new thinking, NATO-Union friends forever, etc., etc.

      So what?
      The country began to develop wildly.
      To the side - decay, collapse, venality.
      The splashing out of everything ... is what was hiding for the time being.
      Previously, it was impossible, not humanly.
      It has become - relevant - universal, democratic ... values.
      The value of these "values" - we have studied for 20 years.
      Along and across.

      Increasing the speed of treading on the spot - does not mean progress.
      Why abroad are so popular with all kinds of simulators, paths there, complexes.
      Run-run .... but still next to the feeder.
      Zashibis!
      It’s not in Kolyma .. to blame the forest, to build barracks, to cut the coal, to wash the gold.

      In 17, Russia was stopped - on the rise of a military victory.
      Russia in 1985 - they clipped their wings - on the verge of a technical breakthrough (what do you think the total brain drain just happened, the film "Genius" just appeared like that?).
      Russia is now trying to .. stick in the wheels.
      Well, at least, Bolotnaya - the area, Chistye Prudy - the boulevard. And not a highway, a highway.
      There are no wheels needed.
      And the stick inserted between the legs - will be taken away, but on the ridge inserting .. pile.
      So I think.
  23. -2
    14 June 2012 19: 16
    I agree with other comments - a controversial article.
    I quote: "This piece of paper / ruble, that is, / is issued on the basis of the Constitution and on the basis of laws on the Central Bank, and output volumes are proportional, according to the law on the Central Bank and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, to the volume of purchased virtual foreign currency through the mechanism of the so-called gold and foreign exchange reserves. "
    We read the Federal Law on the Central Bank of the Russian Federation:
    "Article 3. The objectives of the Bank of Russia are:
    protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble;
    development and strengthening of the banking system of the Russian Federation;
    ensuring stability and development of the national payment system. "
    "Article 28. The official relationship between the ruble and gold or other precious metals is not established."
    "Article 41. Foreign exchange interventions of the Bank of Russia means the purchase and sale by the Bank of Russia of foreign currency in the foreign exchange market to influence the ruble exchange rate and the total demand and supply of money.
    Article 42. The Bank of Russia may establish benchmarks for the growth of one or several indicators of the money supply, proceeding from the main directions of the unified state monetary policy. "
    "Article 53. The Bank of Russia establishes and publishes official rates of foreign currencies in relation to the ruble.
    Article 54. The Bank of Russia is the body of currency regulation and currency control and exercises these functions in accordance with Federal Law No. 10-FZ of December 2003, 173 "On Currency Regulation and Currency Control" and other federal laws. "

    And where is it stated about the "proportionality of the volume of the ruble issue"? Can anyone explain? (You are welcome) crying
    1. +2
      14 June 2012 19: 41
      If you look in the laws that "... the bankers of the Russian Federation are accountable to the US Federal Reserve System" - you will not find.
      The Federal Reserve is also considered the United States ... US Federal Reserve.
      So is the Central Bank of the Russian Federation ... Russian, utterly.
      Only now ... they themselves have led ... Article 28, article 41, article 42 ... what are they talking about?
      Articles by articles, but there are ... instructions! Oooh, that's cooler than boiled eggs.

      And now let's take and see 173-FZ from 10.12.2003/XNUMX/XNUMX ..
      here is the link .... http: //base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi? req = doc; base = LAW; n = 12303



      2;fld=134;dst=4294967295;rnd=0.5188433279129032;from=116941-13..
      how to figure it out .. report.

      Do you remember Soviet money?
      I remember.
      There, on every piece of gold and above (10 rubles, on smaller bills), the State Treasury Ticket was clearly stated. The property of the Soviet Union, including gold and precious metals, is secured throughout. (Aw, a little like that .. okay)

      This read was - Proudly.
      Even if someone would have presented 1000 rubles for the purchase of gold, a nuthouse would have rushed right there. Let be.

      Some lousy bank that the state should serve - .. ". Sets and publishes the official exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the ruble."
      Yes, with what a cross?
      And why should the ruble be dependent on someone?
      Do we buy oil from anyone? Gas? Corn? Metals? Coal? Chernozem? Forest? Furs? Diamonds are gold? Platinum and Nickel?

      You know the saying - there are no ugly women ....?
      Similarly, there are no incorruptible officials ...
      Read only the first chapter of Robert Heinlein "Friday that Kills" - and everything about the officials will become clear.

      That is why politicians are dragging back and forth ... that's why they had a bad feeling that Putin had thrown them ... that's why Fedorov quotes very ominous words - "... we underestimated Russia ..."

      When will we begin to live quietly, huh?
      1. 0
        15 June 2012 12: 04
        Dear Igor, thank you for the "capacious" paragraphs leading to reflection.
        Let me tell you that the "coolness" of boiled eggs depends on how long they are in the boiling water. Those. instructions should be drawn up on the basis of the Law, but in no case contradict it. But according to your link, I was given the "Order of the Ministry of Social Protection" dated 26.03.1993/XNUMX/XNUMX, which is invalid and not at all in the subject.
        Quote: Igarr
        Only now ... they themselves have led ... Article 28, article 41, article 42 ... what are they talking about?

        Article 28 interprets that the ruble is not attached to any precious metal - does this imply the dependence of the volume of the ruble supply on the dollar? How is it? The ruble of the USSR in 1990 "departed" officially from the "gold standard", but this does not mean that up to that time the ruble was somehow "tied" to gold. You can write anything on the fence, but the functions of the fence from these inscriptions will not change, but only the functions of advertising will be supplemented (at best). Moreover, gold and the rest have become almost a "everyday" commodity, which is traded by all and sundry, but for some reason the highest price (again, in dollars) for ingots according to the standards of the so-called. "GLD" and is installed at the LBMA in London. Knowing this, the question is reasonable: why tie the ruble to such a product?
        Other specified articles of the Federal Law regulate the activities of the Central Bank in relation to other currencies and there is the following in Art. 42: "... proceeding from the main directions of the unified state monetary policy" - and in the same Federal Law, Article 4, it is clearly indicated who appoints this policy. Consequently, according to Fedorov, we get that the government and the Central Bank prescribe a policy of dependence of the volume of the ruble on the volume of the available gold and foreign exchange reserve, i.e. if the Central Bank stores the equivalent of 500 billion dollars, then, based on the exchange rate of the Central Bank (1:30), 15 trillion rubles are in circulation in the Russian Federation - isn't it too little? And what, Fedorov is not aware that the ruble mass (virtual and cash) is also present outside the Russian Federation? Here is Nikolai Starikov, in the recent past - the sales manager of CJSC "Europe plus St. Petersburg", he describes this in detail, although he himself in finance and banking - that a pig in oranges does not distinguish debit from credit.
        Quote: Igarr
        Some lousy bank that the state should serve - .. ". Sets and publishes the official exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the ruble."

        And who, in your opinion, should appoint and / or determine the exchange rate? The non-lavish house of noble maidens Ksenia Sobchak on TNT? It would be interesting to see your offer.
        But it so happened, for one reason or another, that the dollar is the world currency, like / dislike is one thing, but stupidly renouncing it is completely different and basic, because It is foolish to renounce the existing world around, although it is not perfect.
        But the presence of the exchange rate of the ruble established by the Bank of Russia does not mean at all that when I buy goods of production also for Russian rubles, I subsidize the economy of some other state.
      2. 0
        16 June 2012 14: 14
        Quote: Igarr
        There, on every piece of gold and above (10 rubles, on smaller bills), the State Treasury Ticket was clearly stated. The property of the Soviet Union, including gold and precious metals, is secured throughout. (Aw, a little like that .. okay)

        Sorry, I’ll slightly correct notes from 10 rubles and above were called State Bank Tickets, and 1,3,5 ruble denominations were called State Treasury tickets, but on both of them there was the same inscription on providing gold. The gold content of the ruble, if memory serves, 0,97842 gr. gold, i.e. the conditional payment unit 1 ruble was taken to be just such an amount of gold from the gold and foreign exchange reserves of the State Bank.
  24. patriot2
    0
    14 June 2012 20: 01
    But I read the latest information on rambler:
    Russia is ready to continue the “arms race” if the US does not stop deploying a missile defense system in Europe, Vladimir Putin said at a meeting with members of the 393rd Russian Air Force base near Krasnodar. “We have every opportunity for an adequate reaction,” the president said.
    “We must look to the future and respond in a timely manner,” Putin said. “... This is an element of the arms race.”
    “This is not our choice,” the head of state noted. “It would be better to send these funds for peaceful purposes.” “There will be no particular threat,” the president assured, “if, on time, with the right quality and at reasonable prices, the plans for state defense order are fulfilled.”
    The state will render all necessary support to all enterprises and design bureaus, manufacturers on state defense orders, the president promised. But he clarified: the requirements for products will be as stringent as possible, everything must be met "on time, in full, at a high quality level and at economically reasonable prices." It is not planned to increase funding for the state defense order, Putin said: “We may be glad, but there is no money.”
    During a meeting to prepare for the celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Air Force, Vladimir Putin promised the military a thousand new helicopters and 600 aircraft. The prime minister also announced the start of work on a new strategic bomber - the PAK DA long-range aviation complex.
    Putin demanded that the government fully provide funding for the rearmament of the defense industry. The cost of the project is almost 3 trillion rubles.
    Recall that in 2010 Moscow demanded written guarantees from the United States that the Euro-missile defense would not be directed against the Russian Federation. In March this year, Dmitry Medvedev held talks on missile defense with Barack Obama, but the parties could not come to a compromise. In early May, during a visit to the military-industrial corporation NPO Mashinostroenie, Dmitry Rogozin said that Russia would not allow any country in the world to create a missile defense system that would be able to upset the strategic balance.

    Putin is great, it’s difficult and very difficult for him, but if you act, and not wait, then the result will be good.
  25. -1
    14 June 2012 20: 25
    I think the nonsense is far-fetched, some are all too segmented and certain, the world is not like that, everyone wants to see some kind of path scheme and structure in chaos, but the difficulty is that there is none of this there, and there are no laws of the development of the world after the collapse of the USSR, and it was precisely the collapse, and it happened because of us by 95%, we were tired of the USSR and we threw it away, as soon as the tsarist orders had kicked, and even earlier bored Ruriks. There is no helmsman in the world, it was convenient for everyone to see the United States as such in order to blame all the responsibility, well, they climbed out of their skin to correspond to this farce, but the United States is tired of many, and seems to repel like a boring toy that no one knows what will happen next, but many then they’ll scream that they knew it so and planned it’s someone’s plan again
    1. 0
      14 June 2012 20: 55
      I like this approach.
      No discussion.
      Just like.
      Therefore, I repaid one minus.


      and after a minute - I realized that I like it.
      Occam's razor ... like it.
      Man is his own master ... like it.
      Determinism - like it.
      Continue ... US policy - I do not like it.
      That would be ... okay, as in Sportloto-66.
  26. Nechai
    +3
    14 June 2012 20: 34
    "the sphere of ideologies and the sphere of rules are not the sphere of Russian sovereignty in the understanding of the Americans. There will be bombings for violations in these matters, The Hague Tribunal, up to special squads of killers... The fight in this area will be to the death of America. "
    - what can be agreed with the "elite" of the selected, nurtured and refined Zapadlian civilization?!?!?!
    - reliance on broad strata of the PEOPLE THE ONLY way to restore SOVEREIGNTY! Seeing the REAL steps and sharing ALL of their consequences with their people, the authorities will restore self-confidence and faith in themselves. What did the "Kovalevs" in Grozny say to our boys? - "For what you give your lives - you all were betrayed and sold in bulk by your rulers. Throw down the machine gun, raise your hands and you will be happy." Actually, the repertoire does not change ...
    - since the adversary is ready to move on to the hot phase, the gentlemen from the Bilderberg Club need to understand that they and their families are the primary targets for Russian snipers. On an equal footing, so to speak. Remote warfare they are good when ONLY YOU can conduct them, but when in relation to you with the same lard and your musals! There will obviously be a different kalenkor. These "tough peppers" value their quivering skins above all else. So they squeeze the eggs with two spoons - they will become silk in a moment.
    1. +1
      14 June 2012 21: 00
      And there’s nothing to say - +++++++++++++!

      And, technique ... spoons ... very much.
      Very impressive.
      Toothpicks are still good.
  27. patriot2
    0
    14 June 2012 21: 00
    Nechai, but what is interesting is that it is quite possible to find everyone. Someone has to do this at last. And about the reliance on the PEOPLE of Russia (but not the population "is similar to an insect") - this is the real support of power. And of course there is no Russia without a strong Army and Navy.
    1. +1
      14 June 2012 21: 13
      Well, who, Nikolai, who?
      "White arrow" mythical .....
      Nonsense.
      One thing calms me.
      The collapse of the Union was carried out with ..... the corresponding state of the KGB. Not even since 1985. It started earlier. There are many things intertwined.
      But, the collapse - was authorized.
      The president is from that clip.
      The former, it did not happen. Otherwise, he would not have worked in Germany. And not in St. Petersburg.
      Maybe everything went backwards.
      Sanctioned - an act of recovery. ????
      And if it’s otherwise ... then what is all this for?
      And why do you have to wait so long?


      Here, one cannot believe it, the whole situation is reminiscent of some kind of fiction ... There, the States threw some Mikhail Orlov to Leningrad, or something .. Help dissidents. Helped. And then I realized that this is all to the detriment of the United States. But by that time he was reforging.
      Oh and wonderful, the country of Russia. Friends - become ineradicable enemies. Enemies - drunk on kvass - the best sidekick in life.
      "... You can't understand Russia with your mind, you can't measure it with a common yardstick ... Believe, believe, believe.
      What can we do? Vote? In the face of the precinct to give? Or a Polish fan in the balls to warm up?
      1. Volkhov
        +1
        15 June 2012 06: 06
        Quote: Igarr
        Sanctioned - an act of recovery. ????


        Recovery has become physically impossible - an outbreak of Ripples in April 13, therefore they draw different perspectives - the Olympics, the restoration of the USSR, but all these are centralized hallucinations of dying euphoria, they only distract from the few real possibilities that still remain.
  28. -1
    14 June 2012 22: 44
    "This piece of paper is issued on the basis of the Constitution and on the basis of the laws on the Central Bank, and the volume of the issue is proportional, according to the law on the Central Bank and the Constitution of the Russian Federation, to the volume of purchased virtual foreign currency through the mechanism of so-called gold and foreign exchange reserves."
    - And who before complained about the inconvertibility of the Soviet ruble? If anyone remembers, he will specify how the currency equivalent was determined earlier, how the dollar was declared equal to 65 kopecks.
    "Even Gazprom is 40 percent foreign."
    - if the shares are quoted on the stock exchange, then certainly not on the fly transfer, and these shares can be bought (if they are interesting) by foreign citizens. Those. this mention of 40% is speculation by fact.
    "The Central Bank of Russia is separated from the state, subject to New York judicial jurisdiction."
    - Well, if someone has ever dealt with the preparation of contracts, then he will remember which court they prefer to mention in the case of the settlement of disputes. Common practice and again speculation by fact. Etc.
  29. fatanee
    +1
    14 June 2012 22: 49
    Now they throw me sleepers for my comment, but still I will express my point of view.
    Let's start with the fact that once I saw a video with Fedorov, it was a discussion with Navalny on radio "Finam". Although I dislike Navalny, Fedorov is simply unique. Let's just say, at that moment, Navalny lowered him below the plinth, and Fedorov kept carrying his nonsense, inspired by paranoid inclinations about the United States ... That the video, that this article, or rather the dialogue, reflect the same thing, Fedorov, everything in his repertoire and did not even change anything in his words. Nothing new...
    I must say right away, thank God they removed such a frame from the post of chairman of the committee on economic policy and entrepreneurship ... And a small question: does he have an economic education at all?

    I myself am a student of economic faculty of I.F. Frankfurt University Goethe, and I’ll say right away that I’m a patriot of Russia and I also follow all the news and am a fan of Russia! God forbid, who will offend her ... But that is not the point))

    1. Question: can someone explain to me how the issue of monetary units is related to the tribute Mr. Fedorov speaks of?
    As far as I know, the issue of new money should be supported by assets in order to avoid inflation, as the ruble is somehow tied to the dollar, at the moment, like almost the entire world economy as a whole, on the very market that Fedorov spoke about, Russia is buying US government bonds for information. A bond, as everyone knows, is a debt contract, with certain conditions, of course. This is not the first year that Russia has been dumping US government bonds from its reserve, replacing them either with its own assets (since the economy is developing) or with another currency, but also with gold (which is very important, in my opinion!).

    2. Question: Search for the owner of Domodedovo ... "The Americans forbade us to solve it."
    Then I just almost cry ... What kind of Americans?))) Probably, all the same, Mr. Fedorov does not even know that the owner of the shares (even a controlling stake) can remain anonymous even until his death and have no right to whom to look for him, until no illegal actions were committed by the company through his fault. They could not teach him in Russian universities to make such nonsense.

    3. "Seventy percent of our national grants go to grantees in the United States of America ..." - This statement is, to put it mildly, an empty chatter. Can’t it be supported by documents? Otherwise, we have 70% of traitors in the government, except for Mr. Fedorov himself ... Where are the transaction documents? Or where is at least criminal liability for misuse of money?
    Delirium, delirium and again delirium, in my opinion.

    It contradicts the very concepts of the development of the Russian economy, even if Russia paid off its debts (almost all of them), the global crisis has bypassed it, for the most part, and this means a very high stability of the economic system ... How did you allow this if they have such leverage?

    Conclusion: he’s paranoid ... And I don’t want to talk about crafty answers and any specifics from such a high-ranking person.

    I will be glad to constructive criticism and write, if I'm wrong. I will be grateful for this!
    Everything is with me ...))
  30. mind1954
    0
    15 June 2012 04: 52
    CHEAP CROSS!
    The meaning! This mode can’t do anything, don’t worry his nerves,
    fold the handles and come to terms!
  31. 0
    15 June 2012 09: 58
    More on the topic: http://www.bfm.ru/articles/2012/06/05/glazev-uvidel-v-rabote-banka-rossii-ruku-s
    sha.html

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"