The founder of Virgin Galactic announced the imminent start of commercial flights into space.

116
Richard Branson, founder of the famous aerospace corporation Virgin Galactic, in an interview with CBS This Morning said about the start of commercial suborbital flights into space this summer.

The founder of Virgin Galactic announced the imminent start of commercial flights into space.




He announced that three final test starts will be made in the coming weeks. “In a few weeks, we have scheduled another test flight from the Mojave Desert, then - in a few weeks - another one”- said R. Branson.

"And after that, if everything is fine, which I have no doubt, we will transfer everything to New Mexico, where we have a new cosmodrome, and there we will make a final test flight."

The sounded plan is quite consistent with the fact that the founder of Virgin Galactic had already declared 2018 of the year in December, after its shuttle had taken off above the 80-kilometer altitude, designated in the USA as the boundary of the earth's atmosphere.

George Whitesides, executive director of Virgin Galactic, also said earlier that a small number of test flights would be carried out by his company at the beginning of 2019, after which a program of commercial launches from the new private spaceport in New Mexico will be opened .

Add that to the channel Richard Branson came with Kevin Plank, the executive director of the well-known company "Under Armor", specializing in the production of clothing and footwear. According to the agreement, it is this brand that will provide not only clothes and shoes for employees and participants of the commercial space flight program, but will even make a new type of more comfortable spacesuit, and will also undertake the development of a set of pre-flight training programs for Virgin customers.

Branson himself said that he would personally participate in one of the first suborbital flights, while Kevin Plank also confirmed his participation without detailing the flight time, but stating that they both began a pre-flight training complex.

Recall that at the moment, the Virgin Galactic aerospace corporation has a queue of more than 600 customers who have made a deposit for “space tickets” at a price of 250 thousand dollars, and until the further sale of tickets is suspended due to the exhaustion of seats for the next few years old.
  • https://www.facebook.com/pg/VirginGalactic
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    26 January 2019 20: 50
    Elon Musk, are you weak? smile
    1. +9
      26 January 2019 21: 01
      He does not engage in sub-orbital tourism; he sells tickets for the flyby of the Moon. If the tourism industry is interested.
      And so he still strengthens dominance in the commercial market of orbital launches and prepares Starlink
      1. -3
        27 January 2019 04: 12
        Quote: BlackMokona
        he is still strengthening dominance in the commercial market for orbital launches and is preparing Starlink

        What does he strengthen there? And how, many people have already flown, in the framework of strengthening dominance? In addition to the mannequin, so far no one.
        he sells tickets for the flyby of the moon
        His grass is picky. So far besides trepidation, nothing, zero.
        1. +3
          27 January 2019 08: 42
          And here people, the commercial market are launches of commercial satellites. While orbital hotels and other things have not been configured, people fly only as a government order and very rarely as tourists on the ISS. So rare that this is not a market yet. And according to the launches, he had more than Rosscosmos last year and more than half of commerce, rather than state orders
          1. +1
            27 January 2019 16: 40
            Quote: BlackMokona
            And here people

            People, this is the level of technological progress, since manned flights are an order of magnitude more difficult than throwing a piece of iron into orbit. The states cannot do this at this stage, fact. Joke on about the trampoline.
            1. -2
              28 January 2019 09: 51
              Laugh, the man was thrown right in the wake of the satellite. That's the whole difference in those levels. Only 4 years.
    2. +18
      26 January 2019 21: 27
      Is that all you can answer? And about Gagarin, Titov and other pioneers forget? Shame, the whole world is stepping forward, and you are all showing off with a cork lid? Oh well...
      1. +7
        26 January 2019 21: 34
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        And about Gagarin, Titov and other pioneers forget? Be ashamed, the whole world is stepping forward, and you all show off the cap with the cork? Oh well...

        1. +3
          26 January 2019 21: 47
          cruel you man
        2. +1
          26 January 2019 22: 48
          Do you want a new plan from the "mask"? .. smile If you want to become an astronaut from Roskosmos, we are waiting for your financial proposals .... hi
      2. +15
        26 January 2019 21: 58
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        Is that all you can answer? And about Gagarin, Titov and other pioneers forget? Shame, the whole world is stepping forward, and you are all showing off with a cork lid? Oh well...

        Now Rogozin's ball rules there. He dreams to the best of his imagination, and the construction sagged, of 19 objects, only 5 are ready, I recently heard.
        So Gagarin, Titov, Korolev is a very glorious, heroic, but inverted page of history. Unfortunately request
        1. +7
          26 January 2019 22: 39
          Quote: den3080
          Now Rogozin's ball rules there. He dreams to the best of his imagination, and the construction sagged, of 19 objects, only 5 are ready, I recently heard.

          And what’s interesting is that it’s with state money — they steal and cannot finish building, but what about the Yankees? build on private money - and each aerospace corporation has more than one cosmodrome ...
        2. 0
          27 January 2019 00: 58
          Well, flying in a dream and in reality - in words. Already in the words of the representatives of Roscosmos, we flew to the Moon 30 times, and to Mars as many as 70 - since 2008.
        3. -2
          27 January 2019 04: 18
          Quote: den3080
          but a flipped page of history

          Wait, what, besides Roskosmos, is there someone else who flies into space? Just leave the talk about the fact that cargo was delivered to the ISS by the "Falcon". There is a huge difference between launching something into space and flying into space. I ask, who else besides Russia flies into space? Only Chinese, sometimes. Where is Musk?
          1. +4
            27 January 2019 07: 36
            Wait, but what, besides Roscosmos, is someone else flying into space? .... Vitaliy -GUGLYA to help you and you just shame on what is there (in space, planets, asteroids and other rings wassat ) ONLY DOES NOT FLY, RIDES, REMOVES AND LISTEN fellow Look, do not be lazy, how many countries of what, where and why they sent for the current ten years. And we will not tell tales about one and all everything about our carriers, engines and Trampolines laughing
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +6
                27 January 2019 11: 16
                Setrac - yes it is not possible ... in Canada ... but nothing that there have been tested and tested PROTOTYPES and this helps the service personnel to understand what and how it will work, and what needs to be done and can be done in crisis situations. They pulled up, really, to nod already at the fake pavilions of the Hollywood Mosfilm. The prototypes Lunokhod-1 and Lunokhod-2 were also rolled on a fake test site before sending the final product to a given landing point. This is our props and imitation of violent activity ... with a drain in all directions in the space industry. By the way, the Canadian manipulator on the ISS is not so badly pulling not our trucks - the same props and kino? You can "giggle" as much as you want over our successes ... but only the blind cannot see the degradation of our (that is, the USSR) space achievements. Go to specialized NASA sites and rummage in the daily stream of information transmitted from Mars.
                And in the heavenly crystal dome, new holes are aligned drinks
                1. -2
                  27 January 2019 11: 44
                  Quote: viktor_ui
                  Setrac - but not really ... in Canada ... but nothing that PROTOTYPES were tested there and it helps the maintenance staff to understand what and how it will work, and what needs to be done and can be done in case of emergencies.

                  Well of course, who doubted the prototypes. Does this somehow prove the presence of a rover on Mars? It does not prove in any way.
                  Quote: viktor_ui
                  They lifted up, really, to nod already at the fake pavilions of the Hollywood-Mosfilm.

                  The Americans pass off footage taken in Canada as footage taken on Mars. And then on Ren-TV they talk about the Martians. Where do you think all these footage of Martian artifacts come from? They are from Canada. Do you know that the "rover" filmed "lizards, lemmings" on Mars? Ask how you "found" buildings on Mars. How the same "attendants" got into the frame. Whose hands left traces in the dust on the surface of the rover. They lied about the Moon, they lied about Mars - yes, they generally have no space programs beyond the Earth's orbit!
                  Quote: viktor_ui
                  The prototypes Lunokhod-1 and Lunokhod-2, too, were rolled on a fake test site before sending the final product to a given landing point.

                  Ours did not try to give out the video shot at the training ground as the original footage from the moon.
                  Now I’m sitting and doubting whether there was a flight to a comet, a flight to Jupiter, and are Voyagers flying in space?
                  NO do not fly.
                  Shine amerikosy.
                  1. +4
                    27 January 2019 13: 08
                    So, let's check the entire shoblu, headed by Rogozin, and send it with the inspection - it will definitely benefit the Russian Space Agency. It would be necessary in Tesla Ilona them all together and send with verification. Buy-sell smart managers are so tenacious ... one hundred pounds would have survived. And about Mars and the orbital and terrestrial information supplied from it - dig and compare from various sources ... or fly by yourself and check the TRUTH drinks
            2. 0
              27 January 2019 16: 29
              Quote: viktor_ui
              RIDING, REMOVING AND LISTENING

              You can't read. I asked, who else flies into space? It does not launch something, but flies. Why did Musk launch the dummy and not fly himself? For "lovers" of progress, I will say, because so far, except for Russia, no one can deliver a man into space. Here are all the trampoline jokes.
              1. 0
                27 January 2019 16: 58
                The Chinese can - and from this year, the Americans can again.
                1. -1
                  27 January 2019 17: 10
                  Quote: Vadim237
                  The Chinese can - and from this year, the Americans can again.

                  I have already mentioned the Chinese, they can, but so far, as it is not entirely sure, occasionally. I'm just trying to convey to die-hard "lovers of American progress" that Americans do not fly into space, they launch something there. That's when they can (as you write), then all questions will disappear. In the meantime, welcome to the old Soyuz, which super-duper Americans don't have.
                  1. 0
                    28 January 2019 00: 44
                    The Americans now also have their own Union - Falcon 9 and the Dragon 2 ship - as well as four more ships in iron, the result of all this is the complete loss of Russia's advantage in space and the subsequent degradation of the space industry.
                2. 0
                  28 January 2019 14: 06
                  This year is unlikely.
              2. +1
                28 January 2019 06: 14
                Vitaliy is an adherent of Rogozin ??? Wait a bit and ALREADY VERY and VERY SOON space ships from competitors will be a horseradish cloud. We have a solid modernization of old developments from the USSR where you can’t spit it ... and this indicates the deepest crisis of the school of designing devices of the 21st CENTURY. We are like horses (those proud of the dug out sea, poured by mountains, etc. like nonsense) proud of the old merits of our GREAT predecessors in the space industry - only if they could return to their heritage, their amazement would have no limit. And after they would ask what you did with our achievements, and after that you just would have given all these high-ranking cosmos thieves to the faces. Are we like flying ??? Well, yes, in near-Earth orbit we even stir ... we started to prepare the cosmobab squad - the apotheosis of development is visible. And what kind of fetish do you have - manned objects must fly in cosmos, and everything else is kind of crafty wassat Elon Musk and his ilk have roskokosmos in all its cosmic holes fellow
                1. 0
                  28 January 2019 16: 48
                  Quote: viktor_ui
                  ALREADY VERY and VERY SOON

                  Firstly, about the adept Rogozin, you got excited. Not Rogozin, he invented space flights. Secondly, to promise to get married does not mean that tomorrow is a wedding. As you got, your "soon" "very soon". When? At this stage, this is not, and enough idle chatter about the "American Dream". When this "very soon" comes, I will be the first to congratulate them, but for now, only on "Soyuz" or on Russian engines.
                  1. 0
                    28 January 2019 18: 06
                    fellow Yes Vital, your eco-pins in terms of the uniqueness of the Unions and the only engines in the world. Sales will not oppose you anymore - it makes no sense.
                    Cargo Ship SERIES "HTV" Konotori - Japan with a payload of 6 tons. Yapi sculpted the manned Fuji, but so far they have driven the bolt for a while, switching to other projects. The Kibo module on the ISS on our engines was apparently threaded (by what, why, and which diverse compartments they docked - look for yourself). And the flights of Hayabusa (the mission was successfully completed) and Hayabusa-2 (we are waiting for the return in 2020) to asteroids with soil sampling - IT'S A SONG. And the roscocosmos of manned cosmos in response wassat Japan is very modest, but effective UNIVERSAL.
                    Hindus - sales, they already managed to fly to Mars ... CARL ... Hindus are always dancing and crying !!! And we have kosmotolki on the way.
                    China has almost shod us in the space race ... its full-fledged station will definitely launch in the very near future. About their flights to the moon ... we will be modestly silent and do not drive the blizzard that our engines and carriers are there - they are similar, but no more.
                    About the current programs of NASA, the European Space Agency ... to tell the scrap because only the lazy one does not know about them ... because the levels in technical performance are simply not comparable with what is being done with us. Rosskosmos, this is AvtoVAZ in today's incarnation - expensive, inefficient, arrogant and corrupt. So to spoil the golden heritage of the USSR, UNCONDITIONLY, TALENT IS NEEDED. Sad and prepare a congratulation. You will need it soon.
                    1. 0
                      28 January 2019 22: 54
                      Quote: viktor_ui
                      Sad and prepare a congratulation.

                      No problem, congratulations. But so far everyone is shouting "hop", although no one has "jumped" yet. lol
      3. SSR
        +7
        26 January 2019 23: 50
        Quote: Leader of the Redskins
        the whole world steps forward, and you all show off the cap with the cork?

        Here the main trend is that we will win and won.
        But this is not a problem of forum users, this is a site of a problem, what is the resource, such is the contingent.
        Interesting from.
        Richard Branson, founder of the famous

        I tell.
        This eccentric, when he owned the airline, introduced such a chip.
        People are calling to buy a ticket, an answering machine answers him with Branson's voice.
        - if within 40 seconds, our employee does not answer your call, you will receive a 90% discount.
        This is what I?
        A bunch of crackers, have no idea about this and that, but they are such categorical sofas.
        By the way, 1 mirror, took it in arms and gave a 10% discount.
    3. 0
      27 January 2019 01: 11
      not the topic, but ... in my opinion important info
      There was a video of the Tu-22M3 crash in the Murmansk region
  2. -15
    26 January 2019 20: 56
    600 people are ready to lay out such dibs for jumping above the atmosphere? -Where are so many dibs? belay
    1. +16
      26 January 2019 21: 02
      Once upon a time, everyone dreamed of flying into space. Now these are stupid people for the people. Gagarin’s time has passed request
      1. -8
        26 January 2019 21: 03
        This is not a flight into space, but only going beyond the atmosphere.
        1. +13
          26 January 2019 21: 04
          And beyond the atmosphere, if not space, then what?
          1. -8
            26 January 2019 21: 08
            Outside the atmosphere — the troposphere — a flight into space somehow seems to be an orbital flight — not like leaps.
            1. +7
              26 January 2019 21: 16
              In the region of 80 km is the mesosphere, then the thermosphere.
              1. -1
                26 January 2019 21: 18
                Quote: figvam
                In the region of 80 km is the mesosphere, then the thermosphere.

                So, where is the Mesozoic then? drinks
              2. -10
                26 January 2019 22: 39
                Quote: figvam
                In the region of 80 km is the mesosphere, then the thermosphere.

                What difference does it make, suborbital flight refers to astronautics in the same way as sailing on an inflatable mattress is to navigation - nothing at all.
                1. +2
                  27 January 2019 06: 17
                  Quote: Setrac
                  suborbital flight refers to astronautics in the same way as swimming on an air mattress to navigation
                  Not a good example. You can sail on an inflatable mattress.
                  1. 0
                    27 January 2019 10: 19
                    Quote: Simargl
                    Not a good example. You can sail on an inflatable mattress.

                    It is possible, I will not argue, but it is unlikely that future seafarers in their childhood dreamed of such "navigation" - on an inflatable mattress. Although you are generally right, you can swim on an air mattress for several days - an eternity compared to the short jump out of the atmosphere and the fall back of a suborbital plane.
                    1. 0
                      27 January 2019 10: 37
                      Quote: Setrac
                      eternity in comparison with short-term jumping out of the atmosphere and falling back of a suborbital aircraft.
                      You can feel like a warhead wassat
              3. 0
                27 January 2019 00: 09
                Something I did not understand: "Exosphere 500-2500 km temperature from + 1200 to +2500 C", that is, if I go out into outer space there, I will not freeze, but will I burn?
                1. +6
                  27 January 2019 08: 43
                  There the atmosphere is such that you will burn longer than you get old
                2. -1
                  28 January 2019 00: 49
                  In the table, they made a mistake.
                3. 0
                  28 January 2019 14: 08
                  At school it was necessary to study well, and not to miss classes. Reread physics of the 6-7th class
              4. +1
                27 January 2019 00: 31
                The altitude of 100 km - the so-called Karman line - has been considered the boundary of space for more than half a century. It was determined by an American engineer and physicist of Hungarian descent, Theodor von Karman.
                It corresponds to the height at which aerodynamic forces cease to have a dominant effect on the aircraft.
                However, not all large organizations in the field of space and aeronautics adhere to the Karman line. Thus, the US Air Force considers the height of 50 miles as the border of space, which corresponds to 80 km.

                It is so convenient for Americans to consider their flights NEAR-EARTH and SPACE.
                1. 0
                  27 January 2019 10: 55
                  Quote: hohol95
                  It is so convenient for Americans to consider their flights NEAR-EARTH and SPACE.
                  ESA considers the lower limit of 100 km. Not much more.
                  As I understand it, this is the minimum height at which orbital flight is possible (at least a turn).
                  1. 0
                    27 January 2019 17: 19
                    In your 20 km is this height is a trifle?
                    1. +1
                      27 January 2019 17: 36
                      In my opinion, from the point of view of Russian and Soviet cosmonautsif the trajectory was ballistic, then at least 400 km.
                      From the ESA point of view, the Soyuz MS-10 flight was a space flight, but in fact (in Russian) ...
                  2. 0
                    27 January 2019 19: 33
                    Quote: Simargl
                    ESA considers the lower limit of 100 km. Not much more.
                    As I understand it, this is the minimum height at which orbital flight is possible (at least a turn).

                    100 km is the Karmana line.
                    At about this altitude, the atmosphere becomes so rarefied that aerodynamic aviation becomes impossible, since the speed of the aircraft, which is necessary to create sufficient lift, becomes greater than the first cosmic velocity.

                    At least one orbital revolution is possible at an altitude of 130 km.
                    And then only for an ideal case - a ball with a diameter of a meter and a mass of 1 ton.
                    Real devices are less dense and have protruding parts - therefore, for them the minimum turn height is -140-145 km.
            2. +8
              26 January 2019 21: 16
              Sad with education now
              Troposphere - the lower, most studied layer of the atmosphere
      2. -5
        26 January 2019 22: 35
        Quote: BlackMokona

        Once upon a time, everyone dreamed of flying into space. Now these are stupid people for the people. Gagarin’s time has passed

        Yeah, for example, a man dreams of sea trips, and they brought him to the beach, gave him a circle and go - don’t swim for buoys, a sailor ...
        1. +9
          26 January 2019 22: 40
          Quote: Setrac
          Yeah, for example, a man dreams of sea trips, and they brought him to the beach, gave him a circle and go - don’t swim for buoys, a sailor ...

          For many, this is enough - going to space for 0, 25 mln.u. - this is a much more real amount than 20-30 mln.u. (the price of space tourism in the Unions).
          1. -7
            26 January 2019 22: 46
            Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
            For many, this is enough - going to space for 0, 25 mln.u. - this is a much more real amount than 20-30 mln.u. (the price of space tourism in the Unions).

            But for example, a stone - can also be considered an unmanned aerial vehicle? After all, if you leave him - he will fly!
          2. 0
            27 January 2019 04: 25
            Quote: Mikhail Matyugin
            the cost of space tourism in the Unions

            On the Soyuz, a truly full-fledged space flight, and not a 10-minute stay in zero gravity. Well, this is probably enough for many.
    2. +12
      26 January 2019 21: 44
      Quote: Bone1
      600 people are ready to lay out such dibs for jumping above the atmosphere? -Where are so many dibs?

      Why morons?
      New sensations, knowledge of the wealth of the world, adventure is wonderful.
      And they have so many grandmas. that all the same, do not spend for life ....
      1. -11
        26 January 2019 21: 51
        Like, have you already experienced all possible sensations, the whole world has traveled, and there’s nothing more to want, but they didn’t fly into space? belay -You can change the floor, or at least fingers in the socket laughing
        1. -1
          27 January 2019 01: 04
          And all that remains of you, after the outlet, is boldly wrapped and sent into space - in a newspaper.
      2. +5
        26 January 2019 22: 10
        Quote: Olgovich
        New sensations, knowledge of the wealth of the world, adventure is wonderful.

        Our tourists also launched. Into orbit. I remember the sandwiches for the main composition they cooked there. I missed something. Why did they stop? 20 lyamas, it seemed, the pleasure was worth it. Just for such:
        Quote: Olgovich
        And they have so many grandmas. that all the same, do not spend for life ...
        1. +1
          27 January 2019 01: 11
          They replaced tourists with astronauts, they paid more for those. Once the places are free, again different tourists will fly.
        2. -2
          27 January 2019 04: 32
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          Why did they stop?

          Times have changed. Tourists were not brought into orbit from a good life. One acquaintance served at the airport in the Crimea, even under Ukraine, the salaries of the pilots are scanty. So they, too, in the 90s, rolled German tourists on MIGs. From 800 to 1000 euros, and please take half an hour on a combat aircraft.
          1. +1
            27 January 2019 10: 59
            Quote: orionvitt
            on MIGs rolled
            Now even on the L-29 at least 200000. A flight to the stratosphere on the MiG - 31 costs 800 p.
            To trample on the axis of the Earth from the North is 1,5 milon (now, probably, more expensive).
            1. 0
              27 January 2019 16: 32
              Quote: Simargl
              Now even on the L-29 at least 200000

              Can you read? the conversation was about the 90s and in Ukraine.
          2. 0
            27 January 2019 11: 48
            Quote: orionvitt
            Times have changed.

            Business is business. From a good life, whether or not a bad one ... Branson, not from a bad life, started all this. Sense of denyushka, for sure!
            I think so. ©
      3. 0
        27 January 2019 01: 37
        In addition to the dose of radiation there will not be any particular sensations))) there is no weightlessness, and then what is the point ??? look at the black space and the rounding of the ball ... it is possible with MIG 31
        1. 0
          27 January 2019 04: 32
          Quote: loki565
          weightlessness is not, and then what is the point?

          Not really, they promise about ten minutes of zero gravity.
        2. +2
          27 January 2019 11: 00
          Weightlessness even on the Yak-18 can be created by flying along the Kepler’s parabola.
    3. +9
      26 January 2019 21: 46
      Well Bezos vs. Branson on this cake. Identical concepts - the most affordable flight. As for money (Bezos has the famous - as a New York-Paris ticket for Concord, but the truth is in the bright future, far from immediately), and for tolerances. That is, even the 50 summer housewife from Texas, even a plump businessman without physical training, should be allowed to fly.

      Full Bezos profile:

      Branson's Full Profile:

    4. +1
      26 January 2019 21: 48
      and you would have money not flew
      1. +1
        26 January 2019 22: 14
        I haven’t seen so much in my native country yet, there’s not enough life, and in the world
    5. +5
      26 January 2019 22: 09
      Quote: Bone1
      600 people are ready to lay out such dibs for jumping above the atmosphere? -Where are so many dibs?

      The fact is that for you "such money" for most of them is quite a normal amount that they can most likely afford to spend several times a year on their entertainment. There probably are a few people for whom this is the most part of their free money savings, but they are most likely very few.
      1. -2
        26 January 2019 22: 17
        Did you understand what you wrote yourself? -There are very few people for whom 250 thousand greens is "most of their free savings" -that's poverty, well, so then, are they all millionaires?
        1. +3
          26 January 2019 22: 22
          There are only 540 billionaires in the United States. Consider yourself whether there can be found 600 people who can spend half a lemon at their leisure.
          1. 0
            26 January 2019 22: 28
            Rich people are rich because they don’t spend their income right and left, and if a person is a billionaire, it means that his enterprises are valued at this amount and not that he has a billion unnecessary in his pocket.
            1. +5
              26 January 2019 22: 29
              Well, for example, the owner of the company in which I work, has 6 yachts. He bought the latter for 400 million euros. Sailing. His colleagues spend quite similar. I do not know whether it is right or left.
              1. -6
                26 January 2019 22: 33
                So it’s just stupidly stealing from the budget, a normal entrepreneur invests money in the development of a business and does not suffer from such garbage.
                1. +2
                  26 January 2019 22: 35
                  Yes, you’re unlikely to steal so much from the budget. Man runs chemical fertilizer, coal, and thermal and electric energy companies.
                  1. 0
                    26 January 2019 22: 39
                    Why is it unlikely from the budget? - there are not so many in the budget? laughing -And did he create these companies? -Has received for free in the 90s all these plants, mines, power plants, now he is sitting and fattening, an entrepreneur has been found.
                    1. +5
                      26 January 2019 22: 41
                      In the United States, billionaires also ride yachts in the same way, although it seems that they did not participate in any privatizations. The most expensive yacht in general at the head of Apple
                  2. 0
                    27 January 2019 01: 05
                    Do you have Uralkali?
                    1. 0
                      27 January 2019 05: 20
                      SGK. I left the info there. If you google a sailing yacht for 400 million euros. Google will reveal the secret of whom I mentioned immediately
        2. +4
          26 January 2019 23: 01
          There are enough millionaires
          There are about five million millionaires in America today,
          1. -2
            27 January 2019 04: 44
            Quote: BlackMokona
            There are enough millionaires

            It is clear that if America has the most money, then there are millionaires there. But in the states, a millionaire is not the person who has a million in the bank, but the one whose assets are estimated at more than a million. Assets and money are slightly different things. I doubt that many of the five million state millionaires can afford to spend 250 thousand for a half-hour flight. Most Americans, as elsewhere, stretch from paycheck to paycheck. And millions generally live in boxes.
            1. -2
              27 January 2019 11: 05
              Quote: orionvitt
              I doubt that many of the five million state millionaires can afford to spend 250 thousand for a half-hour flight.
              Let’s do this: someone can save a year to dine at the MD restaurant, while someone buys football clubs with pocket money.
              In our country, people pay 100 KR for taking 2 minutes to gawk at a rocket, and here it’s only 250 cb in order to feel everything from within.
    6. +4
      26 January 2019 23: 19
      Indeed, you need to be a "moron", earn so much to allow yourself, such not cheap entertainment laughing
      You, "smart", probably can too?))
    7. 0
      27 January 2019 01: 26
      If you want to feel weightlessness, it is easier to do this on special IL 76 or Boeing that simulate weightlessness.
    8. +1
      27 January 2019 11: 00
      These 600 guys are smarter than you, because they were able to earn such money.
      1. -2
        27 January 2019 11: 49
        Quote: Vadim237
        These 600 guys are smarter than you, because they were able to earn such money.

        Honestly, such money cannot be earned. These 600 people are the most unscrupulous in the world, villains and thieves.
        "Earn" - from the word "work". The people you mentioned have not worked a single hour in their lives.
        1. 0
          27 January 2019 17: 03
          We have to do our own thing, a granny on seedlings has 1500000 rubles a season, she has 69 lemons a year when she is familiar with building equipment leasing - and you say that it’s impossible.
          1. +1
            27 January 2019 20: 47
            Quote: Vadim237
            We have to do our own thing, a granny on seedlings has 1500000 rubles a season,

            That is, this very mythical "granny" has saved up for a flight into space? Well, why lie so impudently, it is physically impossible to grow seedlings worth 1.5 million rubles with your own labor. I know about growing seedlings first-hand - from my own.
            Quote: Vadim237
            the acquaintance on leasing of construction equipment receives 69 lemons per year - but you say impossible.

            More recently, money-lenders were officially criminals and their activity was a crime.
            1. 0
              28 January 2019 00: 55
              Of course it’s impossible - six people work for her. And the greenhouses are equipped with the latest technology with microclimate and drip irrigation. Recently there were - when was this?
  3. +1
    26 January 2019 21: 04
    But it can really happen. If private corporations can afford it, then this option is quite possible.
  4. +3
    26 January 2019 21: 21
    And doesn’t clatter on the ground, as last time?
    1. +9
      26 January 2019 21: 22
      Everything sooner or later falls. The only question is the risks. People do extreme sports or drive cars and nothing
    2. +10
      26 January 2019 21: 41
      The investigation found that the pilot himself mistakenly removed the locks. Now this is impossible. The ship would be 100% operational. But as soon as the locks were removed, he began to reconfigure and at that speed just fell apart.
  5. +2
    26 January 2019 21: 39
    . According to the agreement, this particular brand will not only provide clothes and shoes for employees and participants of the commercial space flight program, but will even manufacture a new type of more comfortable spacesuit.

    As a young man, I worked at an enterprise where they released the basis for thermal protection of Buran and just a thread for a spacesuit. Well, I’ll tell you a problematic topic without sewing specifically, and the release of the thread itself is such a hemorrhoid that I treat him with a warm smile. ....................
    1. +1
      26 January 2019 22: 43
      Quote: APASUS
      Well, this is a problematic topic, I’ll tell you without sewing specifically, and the release of the thread itself is such a hemorrhoids that I treat him with a warm smile

      By the way, yes, hemorrhoids are still the same. Well, let them try, show off, otherwise you see the NASA spacesuits very dumb, they want their crazy type, well, let ...
  6. +4
    26 January 2019 21: 44
    The first commercial flights were for the USSR. In 1990, the Japanese were brought, and in 91 Englishmen .. (or vice versa. I do not remember) That is, this era has long begun
    1. 0
      26 January 2019 21: 54
      they’ve been in real space, and here it’s high, but it’s still not the same sensations
      1. 0
        26 January 2019 22: 08
        And fig knows what kind of sensations it will be. Cyclic, I think both in "real space" and in "not real"
        1. 0
          27 January 2019 13: 48
          There is another "scythe", they are going to fly to an altitude of 80-90 km without spacesuits.
  7. +4
    26 January 2019 22: 08
    Gfhe k //? I've been reading for a couple of years, your forum, professionals and dolb .. Maybe more, I also decided to participate, because I am not a civilian either.
    1. +2
      26 January 2019 22: 43
      good plane, but its future is foggy
    2. +2
      26 January 2019 22: 49
      Quote: MOZGOHI
      I’ve been reading your forum for a couple of years, I decided to participate too, because I’m not a civilian

      Well then pour in, buddy drinks
    3. +3
      26 January 2019 23: 37
      Quote: MOZGOHI
      I read a couple of years, your forum, professionals and fucking .. Maybe more

      Be careful, the word is also a weapon, and here they shoot point blank ... smile
  8. +1
    26 January 2019 22: 34
    Recall that at the moment, the Virgin Galactic aerospace corporation has a queue of more than 600 customers who have made a deposit for “space tickets” at a price of 250 thousand dollars, and until the further sale of tickets is suspended due to the exhaustion of seats for the next few years old.


    I like it, a scam in action, but how I want to dream.
  9. +5
    26 January 2019 23: 13
    If earlier rare units could fly into space and the moon at the expense of the state, and millions did not rise above the palm tree at their own breakfast. Now the crowd will be able to drive the dough into an orbit, spitting on the state’s help, and from there personally, make sure that the rest of humanity is only increasing its tendency to get food on a palm tree!
  10. +9
    27 January 2019 00: 12
    I read the comments and was saddened by the impotent malice of Gagarin's descendants: it turns out that the rich suckers spend money on flights into space in pursuit of new sensations; they dared to fly into space without having traveled all over the earth before and without asking permission from local inhabitants; and space, it turns out to be immediately out of the atmosphere some kind of fake, for suckers. Not a couple of Russian Orthodox space for clear boys, in which Rogozin and Russian private space companies will carry tourists (though, by 2345).
  11. -5
    27 January 2019 00: 21
    The space campaign is bred on the loot is gaining momentum. Still surface areas are not sold on the moon and other planets? ...
    1. -3
      27 January 2019 01: 07
      They’ve been selling it since the 90s - they sold everything out, the reptiles didn’t leave a shred.
  12. +5
    27 January 2019 02: 35
    Quote: Bone1
    600 people are ready to lay out such dibs for jumping above the atmosphere? -Where are so many dibs? belay

    But he himself would not want to be in zero gravity, in space for at least 10-15 minutes? Especially if you know in advance that you cannot become an astronaut due to objective reasons, but do you have money? Why immediately de.bily ???

    Quote: Bone1
    Outside the atmosphere — the troposphere — a flight into space somehow seems to be an orbital flight — not like leaps.

    That is, the first two American astronauts do not consider astronauts anymore? But the first two Americans made a suborbital space flight.
    And further. The troposphere is the LOWER part of the atmosphere. depending on the region in which the observer is located, the upper boundary can be at an altitude of 8-10 km in the polar, 10-12 in temperate and 16-18 in tropical latitudes ....

    Quote: pru-pavel
    There are only 540 billionaires in the United States. Consider yourself whether there can be found 600 people who can spend half a lemon at their leisure.

    A quarter of a lemon
    1. -1
      27 January 2019 10: 37
      Quote: Old26
      That is, the first two American astronauts do not consider astronauts anymore? But the first two Americans made a suborbital space flight.

      Do not count. Jump - a second of flight is provided to you, but this does not mean that you are already a pilot. They are not astronauts, but pilots.
  13. -1
    27 January 2019 11: 46
    And on the Stratolaunch project, it’s not joyful:



    "There will be no beauty and big plans from photography. Paul Allen, the founder of Stratolaunch, known mainly as the co-founder of Microsoft, passed away in October 2018. And now Stratolaunch is undergoing a process of" straightening "the business, which does not look at all rosy. The company has already laid off more than 50 people. and anonymous sources say that now only about twenty are working on the carrier aircraft. According to the latest news, work on the creation of its own carrier rockets for this aircraft has also been stopped. It is assumed that the giant double-body aircraft will launch Pegasus carrier rockets, which previously took off with minimal modified passenger Lockheed L-1011. Problem: the aircraft has enough carrying capacity for three missiles, but they are not particularly in demand on the market now, and the last launches were in 2012, 2013 and 2016. And, if there are no sudden changes, most likely this is the end of Stratolaunch - the carrier is redundant for the Pegasus, and they are not going to create.

    .Now the plane is undergoing tests, on January 9 they successfully conducted high-speed taxiing, in the photographs of which the separation of the nose wheels is visible. The first flight may happen very soon, but without a unique and competitive rocket, this project has a very uncertain future.
    ..."

    https://lozga.livejournal.com/
    1. -1
      27 January 2019 17: 06
      At least there is something to launch from this plane - the project does not bother.
  14. +2
    27 January 2019 14: 02
    Quote: hohol95
    It is so convenient for Americans to consider their flights NEAR-EARTH and SPACE.

    And NASA believes that the border of the atmosphere and the beginning of space at an altitude of 122 km. How then to count the Americans.

    Quote: Setrac
    Quote: Old26
    That is, the first two American astronauts do not consider astronauts anymore? But the first two Americans made a suborbital space flight.

    Do not count. Jump - a second of flight is provided to you, but this does not mean that you are already a pilot. They are not astronauts, but pilots.

    IT IS YOU do not consider them. And in the international federation of astronautics for some reason they think. But there the suckers are sitting, that they are compared with you, with your opinion.
    And for some reason, a couple of Soviet cosmonauts who made a suborbital flight are considered to have flown twice. Once in orbital, and second time in suborbital flight.
    And a couple of American pilots of the X-15 rocket aircraft are also classified as astronauts who made a suborbital space flight, because they climbed 103 and 107 km. And you dear, you can consider anything.
    For example, that half of American astronauts are not so, because they sat on water, for example, and not on land. Or because, for example, they do not speak Russian. You can put forward any criterion.
    By the way, with the same success, Yuri Alekseevich also can not be considered an astronaut who completed an orbital flight. For it took off from Baikonur, began to enter the atmosphere over Africa, sat in the Saratov region, thus not closing its orbit. How do you like this option ???
    1. +2
      27 January 2019 14: 16
      Quote: Old26

      By the way, with the same success, Yuri Alekseevich also can not be considered an astronaut who completed an orbital flight. For it took off from Baikonur, began to enter the atmosphere over Africa, sat in the Saratov region, thus not closing its orbit. How do you like this option ???


      Well, my friend, you were very mistaken in the analogies. Gagarin flew in orbit AROUND the Earth, so the flight is orbital. Whether there was a circle there or not, it no longer matters. Do not confuse such a flight with flying along a parabola.

      But it doesn’t matter, it’s important that such a flight on this rocket plane, with the safety criteria that are now there, is fraught with a possible disaster.
  15. +1
    27 January 2019 22: 39
    Quote: slipped
    Well, my friend, you were very mistaken in the analogies. Gagarin flew in orbit AROUND the Earth, so the flight is orbital. Whether there was a circle there or not, it no longer matters. Do not confuse such a flight with flying along a parabola.

    But it doesn’t matter, it’s important that such a flight on this rocket plane, with the safety criteria that are now there, is fraught with a possible disaster.

    Yes, I understand perfectly. Only some "can not be punched by anything", only as a rigging. After all, a man rested that a suborbital flight is not considered a space flight and you will not prove anything to him ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"