Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv
In this regard, the question arises: if Syria, as the Israeli authorities constantly claim, supports the Iranian military presence on its territory, can Israeli strikes lead to a situation when, if not the CAA, then Iranian forces will actually begin to strike Israeli blows territory? Moreover, strikes at critical facilities of the Israeli infrastructure.
Israel constantly says that it is in a state of war with Syria. And if so, then Damascus is not bound by any obligations at all. Tehran is even more so.
But in reality, the situation looks in such a way that it is the Israeli authorities that are engaged in provocation with attempts to involve Syria and Iran in a major military conflict with the IDF. Israel will certainly suffer certain losses, but the forces are not comparable. The outcome of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government authorities of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad. After all, it is precisely this that those forces that have at one time actually plunged Syria into the war, having used funded terrorist groups to achieve this, have long sought. That is, the very fact of strikes at the Tel Aviv airport will be a gift to the opponents of Assad, whether these strikes have achieved the goal or not.
In this situation, there will be no "massive strikes" on Israel. But Damascus could well expand military and military-technical contacts with Tehran, so that Israel would always be in a “military tone” and spend forces and funds on militarization.
Information