Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv

238
In the morning news Military Review summarized the statement made by Syrian Permanent Representative to the UN Bashar Jafari on the inadmissibility of Israeli actions against Syria. The Syrian diplomat noted that it was high time for the UN Security Council to consider the issue of Israeli actions. At the same time, Jafari wondered: is it time for Syria to strike back - at the Tel Aviv airport - so that the Security Council still deigned to pay attention to the problem?

Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv




In this regard, the question arises: if Syria, as the Israeli authorities constantly claim, supports the Iranian military presence on its territory, can Israeli strikes lead to a situation when, if not the CAA, then Iranian forces will actually begin to strike Israeli blows territory? Moreover, strikes at critical facilities of the Israeli infrastructure.

Israel constantly says that it is in a state of war with Syria. And if so, then Damascus is not bound by any obligations at all. Tehran is even more so.

But in reality, the situation looks in such a way that it is the Israeli authorities that are engaged in provocation with attempts to involve Syria and Iran in a major military conflict with the IDF. Israel will certainly suffer certain losses, but the forces are not comparable. The outcome of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government authorities of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad. After all, it is precisely this that those forces that have at one time actually plunged Syria into the war, having used funded terrorist groups to achieve this, have long sought. That is, the very fact of strikes at the Tel Aviv airport will be a gift to the opponents of Assad, whether these strikes have achieved the goal or not.

In this situation, there will be no "massive strikes" on Israel. But Damascus could well expand military and military-technical contacts with Tehran, so that Israel would always be in a “military tone” and spend forces and funds on militarization.
238 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 January 2019 11: 18
    The result of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government bodies of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad. A controversial statement by the author ... it is one thing to bomb from a distance and a completely different ground invasion, rather it is a "gift" to Iran ... how many "200" cargoes will go back to Israel .... ??
    1. +2
      23 January 2019 11: 24
      Quote: mvd ru
      The result of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government bodies of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad. A controversial statement by the author ... it is one thing to bomb from a distance and a completely different ground invasion, rather it is a "gift" to Iran ... how many "200" cargoes will go back to Israel .... ??

      The statement is, in my opinion, indisputable. Syria will be able to win the war with Israel, only with our very active support .. but do we need it?
      In such a situation, there will be no "massive strikes" against Israel. But Damascus may well expand military and military-technical contacts with Tehran, so that Israel is constantly in a "military tone" and spend forces and funds on militarization.

      Damascus has nowhere to expand military-technical contacts with Tehran, they are already maximally expanded.
      1. +3
        23 January 2019 11: 48
        Quote: Svarog
        Quote: mvd ru
        The result of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government bodies of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad. A controversial statement by the author ... it is one thing to bomb from a distance and a completely different ground invasion, rather it is a "gift" to Iran ... how many "200" cargoes will go back to Israel .... ??

        The statement is, in my opinion, indisputable. Syria will be able to win the war with Israel, only with our very active support .. but do we need it?
        In such a situation, there will be no "massive strikes" against Israel. But Damascus may well expand military and military-technical contacts with Tehran, so that Israel is constantly in a "military tone" and spend forces and funds on militarization.

        Damascus has nowhere to expand military-technical contacts with Tehran, they are already maximally expanded.

        I agree with you. hi
        And I will add a little with my opinion. The fact that we will get involved in a war against Israel is, of course, fantastic. But the fact that if the conflict is intensified, the United States will take part on the side of Israel, this is "don't go to grandma." And no matter how badly I treat the US state, but expect that Syria and Iran will be able to win? Let's see things realistically. Trampled, after Syria, and Iran in the Stone Age. Aviation and missiles. And if a certain amount of "cannon fodder" is needed, they will recruit from Iran's opponents in the BV. Therefore, no one in their right mind will strike at Tel Aviv. If only someone arranges the provocation, that would have a reason to deal with Iran, appeared.
        1. +9
          23 January 2019 12: 52
          Against Iran - yes, the USA will not stand, and will get involved in the conflict.
          And if only against Syria - Israel will surely ask the United States not to get involved. He can handle it.
          And there will not be many 200 cargoes for Israel. Remote war is not invented today. He’ll also get profit, instead of disposing of the written-off stocks of bombs and missiles, everything will go into business.
          The forces are not comparable. Israel will continue to train its pilots in "conditions close to combat."
          To help Assad, it is not necessary to provoke him into a war, but to test our air defense "in conditions close to combat." And if you only shoot down the missiles, it will never end. It is necessary to shoot down the planes that launch these missiles. This is for the first time.
          And for the future, we need a ground-to-ground missile system, and ground-to-air missile system that will destroy not only missiles with shells, but also launchers AUTOMATICALLY. Put such along the border and warn.
          1. +1
            23 January 2019 13: 22
            Quote: Shurik70
            Against Iran - yes, the USA will not stand, and will get involved in the conflict.
            And if only against Syria - Israel will surely ask the United States not to get involved. He can handle it.
            And there will not be many 200 cargoes for Israel. Remote war is not invented today. He’ll also get profit, instead of disposing of the written-off stocks of bombs and missiles, everything will go into business.
            The forces are not comparable. Israel will continue to train its pilots in "conditions close to combat."
            To help Assad, it is not necessary to provoke him into a war, but to test our air defense "in conditions close to combat." And if you only shoot down the missiles, it will never end. It is necessary to shoot down the planes that launch these missiles. This is for the first time.
            And for the future, we need a ground-to-ground missile system, and ground-to-air missile system that will destroy not only missiles with shells, but also launchers AUTOMATICALLY. Put such along the border and warn.

            So I just do not think that Syria will stand against Israel. Just the opposite. About the United States mentioned, for those who are hoping for a bunch of Syria + Iran. Well, about the rest, what should be done. So I’m writing about what is in reality now.
          2. +1
            23 January 2019 16: 34
            .... then let's act like Katz, i.e. give up immediately. In your opinion, this is exactly how it turns out. Israel needs to be firmly put in place ... and even in response to the death of our children, we did nothing, and there, just a moment, very high-class specialists were killed.
          3. mvg
            +2
            23 January 2019 17: 03
            and to test our air defense "in conditions close to combat"

            Will you sit at the helm? Syrians are not fools, they will not climb under rockets. Taught ... several decades in a row trampled on air defense in the sand ... even a monkey will learn to dive head into the sand ..
        2. -4
          23 January 2019 12: 53
          We do not need to get involved anywhere, just take the position of an outside observer. Muslims will solve this issue at a time.
          Another thing is that we need peace and we don’t want anyone’s blood.
          But if Israel persists, then ... another 2000 years of wandering ... there is experience.
          1. +10
            23 January 2019 13: 13
            Quote: flicker
            Muslims will solve this issue at a time.

            Yes, we have seen more than once how Muslims once solved this issue. Or do you have your own parallel story?
            1. -4
              23 January 2019 13: 21
              Well, Jews lived without a state for 2000 years, and now they have such a cool state.
              So Muslims, gained experience, weapons, hatred of Jews, they always had enough. So that ... bully
              1. +7
                23 January 2019 13: 26
                Quote: flicker
                Well, Jews lived without a state for 2000 years, and now they have such a cool state.
                So Muslims, gained experience, weapons, hatred of Jews, they always had enough. So that ...

                Reading your comments, the lines of the classic come to mind: "Horses, people are mixed in a heap ..."
                request
                1. -3
                  23 January 2019 16: 42
                  Quote: Letun
                  Reading your comments, the lines of the classic come to mind: "Horses, people are mixed in a heap ..."

                  Well, from what? laughing
                  all the comments above are devoted to Israel's past victories. very past. about 1984, when Soviet calculations in Syria knocked down American and Israeli planes in general, it is taboo to remember. about a very controversial company in 2007 is also low. about how the "iron dome" fell last year, again, it is not customary to remember. and not only from a volley of 2 (two) Syrian hailstones, but also from a more or less massive launch of Palestinian hasans on their knees from a glued water pipe!
                  I also remind you that Israel was forced to put up with the Palestinians and not to fight. Is Israel ready to fight? full blown.
          2. +6
            23 January 2019 13: 31
            Quote: flicker
            We do not need to get involved anywhere, just take the position of an outside observer. Muslims will solve this issue at a time.
            Another thing is that we need peace and we don’t want anyone’s blood.
            But if Israel persists, then ... another 2000 years of wandering ... there is experience.

            I never urge to get involved. And I treat Israel very evenly, though like Syria and Iran. And he wrote it exactly for those visionaries who, for every reason, heroically defeated Israel in their fantasies. But in reality, Israel stands still and feels not at all bad (I personally do not wish him any harm and, like my neighbors). I just read a lot of comments and wonder how many people's fantasies are divorced from reality.
            1. +4
              23 January 2019 14: 39
              To be above the fray, to mediate in negotiations, to trade in arms and just to trade - this is Russia's path in the Middle East meat grinder. And promote your interests.
              1. -4
                23 January 2019 19: 17
                This applies primarily to Israel, which supplies weapons to terrorists in Syria, write better about it because it was before the advent of Russia
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. 0
          24 January 2019 22: 29
          They have once trampled Vietnam into the Stone Age. Or am I missing something?
      2. -1
        23 January 2019 11: 51
        Hello Volodya. Congratulations on getting out of the bath.
        Enjoy Your Bath. drinks
    2. +4
      23 January 2019 11: 30
      How to say. If you recall ALL the Arab-Israeli wars then ... The Israeli side of the byoa is the winner. Another thing is Israel interested in a full version of the war?
      1. +7
        23 January 2019 11: 53

        In 2024-25, Israel plans to export gas to Europe in the amount of 10-12 billion cubic meters from the Leviathan field. meters per year and Hezbollah promises to carry out attacks on gas infrastructure facilities. Oil and gas are the blood of modern wars and the conflict in the BV will continue to unfold.
        1. 0
          23 January 2019 12: 32
          You can assume that Syria and the Russian Federation have profit. And the issue is resolved. And let the gas into the Turkish stream.
        2. +2
          23 January 2019 14: 47
          Enormous oil reserves have also been explored under the Golan, but no production is allowed - the disputed territories are under UN control. The company, leading the exploration and ready to begin development, was founded by former leaders of the American and British intelligence services. The war of Israel against Syria is needed to legalize the Golan for Israel and to force the Syrian government to do this (better without Assad - that’s how they decided, but did not grow together). Therefore, there is a constant provocation of Syria to retaliate, which will become the case of Bailey. In Syria they know this. They know in Russia. They also understand in Iran ... But for how long their patience is enough.
          Asymmetric measures are needed and it seems they are looking for them.
    3. +3
      23 January 2019 11: 37
      Quote: mvd ru
      The result of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government bodies of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad. A controversial statement by the author ... it is one thing to bomb from a distance and a completely different ground invasion, rather it is a "gift" to Iran ... how many "200" cargoes will go back to Israel .... ??

      Israel tore the Arabs as giddy goats, losing in quantity both by technique and by people tenfold, with the support of the Arabs of the USSR, being surrounded from 3 sides and pressed to the sea. Now Israel surpasses the Arabs at least in terms of the quality of technology, and surpasses it tremendously, Syria is defeated by the war, the Arab powers are not united by a single goal. If last time there was a 6-day war, then this time there will be a 6-hour war
      1. -3
        23 January 2019 11: 54
        I would put you two pluses
      2. 0
        23 January 2019 12: 14
        Quote: Vol4ara
        Arab powers are not united by a common goal

        Nothing brings people together so quickly as a common enemy, in this case Israel.
        For Iran and Israel, or rather the Beni government, the conflict over Syria may be the best solution to domestic political problems. The United States in this case is a serious catalyst for this conflict. The rate of Americans on the terrorists of the Middle East failed, Russia intervened. Now the priorities have changed, but the goals have remained the same.
        1. +3
          23 January 2019 15: 28
          Don’t be stupid, they don’t need the USA. They have a NUCLEAR DUB.
      3. +2
        23 January 2019 12: 43
        Quote: Vol4ara
        If the last time was 6 day war, then this time will be 6 hour

        there will be no 6 watch. Wars have now changed a lot and capturing the capital alone will not be enough.
        1. +3
          23 January 2019 13: 36
          No one will take Damascus. If they go to Syria - then in the border areas and then - for a while. About a month everyone will be there to deliver from the air and missiles, then the UN will fit in and everything will end.
      4. +7
        23 January 2019 13: 01
        Quote: Vol4ara
        Israel tore the Arabs as giddy goats, losing ten times in quantity both in technique and in people

        Especially in the 2006 year in Lebanon with Hezbollah, fought, fought and flayed.
        1. +6
          23 January 2019 13: 33
          Quote: saturn.mmm
          Especially in the 2006 year in Lebanon with Hezbollah, fought, fought and flayed.

          Note that from 2000 to 2006, Hezbollah regularly bombarded the North of Israel. With periodicity much higher than now Hamas. Then look at the frequency of shelling AFTER the war. Do you think that Hizbulla would really win?
          Hezbollah is an army, full-fledged, with an arsenal of maybe more than most others. See also the history of where Israel was at the time of the conclusion of the truce and what potential it had for the further development of hostilities. At that time, the main fighting resistance was crushed. The IDF was actually crushing the battle formations of the Islamists.
          1. -1
            23 January 2019 13: 58
            Quote: Pimply
            The IDF was actually crushing the battle formations of the Islamists.

            Hezbollah chose guerrilla tactics and the IDF had to crush everything together with civilians
            A tragedy in the Lebanese town of Kana, where as a result of an Israeli air raid on the night of July 30, 28 people were killed under the rubble of a collapsed building, (half of them children)
            , reached the river and did not know what to do next, returned without a solo, swallowed, after the war Hezbollah became a parliamentary party in Lebanon, in Israel they were removed from the posts of military commanders, until Hezbollah is needed for Israel.

            It is possible from this angle to consider the results of that war.
            1. +9
              23 January 2019 14: 41
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              Hezbollah chose guerrilla tactics and the IDF had to crush everything together with civilians

              Are you aware that in all wars civilians are dying? In all, without exception. Any large-scale operation is in fact guaranteed losses among the civilian population, with significant losses.

              Quote: saturn.mmm
              , reached the river and did not know what to do next, returned without a solo, swallowed, after the war Hezbollah became a parliamentary party in Lebanon, in Israel they were removed from the posts of military commanders, until Hezbollah is needed for Israel.

              Hezbollah was represented in parliament before the start of the war.

              I certainly understand that you want to convince yourself that white is black. Sometimes the reality of this will remain the same despite your opinion.
              1. -7
                23 January 2019 15: 50
                Israel destroyed civilians just like Hitler in World War II, like the United States in Raqqa.
              2. -3
                23 January 2019 16: 28
                Quote: Pimply
                Do you know that civilians are killed in all wars? In all, without exception. Any large-scale operation is actually a guaranteed loss among the civilian population, significant losses.

                Yes, if you bomb residential areas or drop atomic bombs on cities.
                Quote: Pimply
                Hezbollah was represented in parliament before the start of the war.

                Well, then I won the majority of seats in parliament.
                Quote: Pimply
                Of course, I understand that I want to convince myself that white is black.

                I am not a supporter of the Arabs, that I, in this case, would like something. But the IDF did not fulfill the stated tasks in that operation, no matter what color it is to paint.
                Quote: Pimply
                It happens that the reality of this will remain the same despite your opinion.

                The reality is different.
                1. +3
                  23 January 2019 22: 31
                  That's right - the goal was announced before the war - the destruction of Hezbollah
              3. -1
                23 January 2019 17: 02
                Quote: Pimply
                I certainly understand that you want to convince yourself that white is black. Sometimes the reality of this will remain the same despite your opinion.

                where does it. it’s just that you’ve been carried away by victorious relations with Israel and you are reminded that Israel’s military situation has been very ambiguous lately. What are Spain’s chances to play a leading role in world politics today? and once Vit was a great empire. time goes by, everything changes wink
        2. 0
          23 January 2019 13: 38
          Hezbollah was torn off, they simply dragged on for a month what could have been completed in a week. We played a remote war game with ... partisans, which is why we got 40 corpses of a peacekeeper and 100 army.
          1. -8
            23 January 2019 15: 37
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Hezbollah tore off

            It is fantastic!!! IRA also won. And UNA-UNSO.
        3. 0
          25 January 2019 09: 08
          And what was this "torn to pieces", but there were casualties and losses, for that there was a war, but did not lose, read better.
      5. -7
        23 January 2019 15: 34
        Quote: Vol4ara
        If the last time was 6 day war, then this time will be 6 hour

        The six-day war was in 1967. And won with direct support from the United States.
        Since then, only lost to war bounce. And the structural change of the US Army - they cannot introduce regulars anywhere, only mercenaries. They did not pay off the Goose for Gaza. Now mercenaries, who are called "territorial troops", with green cards and an active desire to sit out.
        And Israel is not even capable of attacking the residence of its own prime minister — the tanks are stalling. This is from recent events.
        1. +10
          23 January 2019 15: 41
          The Six Day War was won without the support of the United States, with a blow to the Amer reconnaissance vessel, which merged Old Jordanians. The War of Attrition is a victory. Doomsday War - US material support - victory. Etc.
          1. -6
            23 January 2019 15: 44
            Somehow you are not very with history.
            Actually, returnees describe the indigenous people in this way.
            If anything, our brigade in the army was called Syrian.
            1. +8
              23 January 2019 15: 48
              In turn, I advise you to read information from open sources on the Internet hi
              About Shestidevnaya 1967, October 1973, To exhaustion - 1969 (8) -70, Lebanese (1982), Second Lebanese 2006.
              1. -2
                24 January 2019 13: 34
                The current press of those years can replace
                Quote: Krasnodar
                information from open sources on the Internet

                ? And what if newspaper information does not fundamentally converge with the Internet?
                1. +4
                  24 January 2019 13: 35
                  Whose Press? If the Soviet, then ... mmm, too biased in favor of the Arabs for so many reasons, both foreign and domestic.
                  1. -1
                    24 January 2019 13: 42
                    I prefer Slavic languages. Father is romance. Alas, the reports converged. And the south, and the French, and the Italians. And, imagine, KP reporters. If anything, we also learned English.
                    1. +4
                      24 January 2019 13: 50
                      The Italians and the French wrote about the defeat of Israel in all wars after the Six Day? )))
                      If Humanite and Figaro, sponsored from Soviet sources, then it is possible. If the unbiased Western press of those times, then it cursed Israel for winning the Doomsday War, because its consequence was the energy crisis associated with the oil embargo of the Arab countries against the West, which helped Jews.
                      1. 0
                        24 January 2019 14: 22
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Humanite and Figaro Sponsored from Soviet Sources

                        Then they could not exist. Yes, and there were reports from Reytars. Sorry, it seems like you don’t know the latest history in practice. The Internet, in terms of history, is more like oral art.
                      2. +4
                        24 January 2019 14: 33
                        Believe me, I also read the Times of the 80s (Maman's girlfriend taught military English) and, while in Israel, filed the Amer and British press, especially everything related to the Arab-Israeli wars)). Roughly speaking, he had access not only to the commi-oriented press. In addition, I read some of the military analyzes on the Doomsday War, both Amer and Soviet (the use of attack helicopters against armored vehicles), etc. Only the Soviets and the Arabs themselves could write about the victory of the Arabs in the War of Attrition, the War of Doomsday, the Lebanese Wars, and even that was for "internal" use. Professionals and politicians see everything differently and this porridge for plebs is not interesting to them. I'm talking about Soviet and Arab politicians and the military.
                      3. -2
                        24 January 2019 14: 37
                        Alas
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        80s Times

                        Times 60-70xx is not related.
                        The history of newspaper and other media tycoons is also the latest history.
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Professionals and politicians see everything differently and this porridge for plebs is not interesting to them.

                        The military, in your opinion, have nothing to do with "professionals and politicians." The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, as in the USSR and RI, did not think so. The area of ​​France, which so stubbornly believes, in spite of its military-politicians de Gaulle and de Saint-Exupéry (and many, many, commemorated by the Foreign and Free Legions) slightly surpasses Little France on Lake Baikal.
                      4. +4
                        24 January 2019 14: 43
                        The Times and other publications of the early 70s with articles on topics of interest to me before the broad introduction of the Internet I also saw, also in Israel laughing The question is - where did you get access to the Western press from the Soviet Union? )).
                      5. +3
                        25 January 2019 15: 04
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        The question is - where did you get access to the Western press from the Soviet Union? )).

                        Soyuzpechat - only in France from 6 to 12 editions., At least 10 editions of the Anglo-American (alas), 6 Serbian-Croatian, Bulgarian - even wrote to his daughter. I didn’t count, but about 8 Italian, a dozen two German (Germany), Spanish by subscription, including LA, etc.
                        Under the Soviet Union, the usual branches of the Union Press were quite free with the periodic press of cap.states.
                        True, in some there was a delay of up to 3 days and an embassy reprint. But they could simply be written out, the "relatives" came.
                        Nothing supernatural, but completely different from the doctrine of the Iron Curtain. By the way, the Iron Curtain descended inside the country that proclaimed it, usually under the pretext of increasing influence in the country of neo-Nazism (Great Britain), Marxism-Communism (it sounds wild, but it is the USA, McCarthyism), neo-fascism in Italy and Luxembourg (these managed to maintain relations with the USSR). We have never been friends with the countries of Batavia. I fully understand my ancestors, who even took the Dutch away.
                        By the way, both past and current politicians stubbornly confuse communism and Trotskyism. The latter is a variation of anarcho-syndicalism without a scientific basis, by the way, to smithereens and actually excite the ideas of anarchism, which are saturated with the white movement and its last type of liberalism.
                      6. 0
                        25 January 2019 15: 29
                        hi I did not know what was the situation with the Union ..
                        Trotskyism is the building of communism throughout the world through revolutions in each country, Leninism is the building of communism in a single country, Stalinism is the building of socialism in a single country. If by and large.
                      7. 0
                        26 January 2019 19: 08
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Trotskyism is the building of communism throughout the world through revolutions in each country, Leninism is the building of communism in a single country, Stalinism is the building of socialism in a single country. If by and large.

                        This is not from our textbooks. And not from the materials of the Trotskyists.
                        Need to draw conclusions?
                        I suggest that Trotskyism is based on the ideology of "Land and Freedom".
                      8. -1
                        26 January 2019 19: 13
                        I taught differently. Trotskyism is the building of communism throughout the world through the World Revolution. I did not read the Trotskyist interpretation of communism itself, to be honest. I read Krapotkin, Lenin, Stalin, Marx. Trotsky has not yet reached hi
                      9. 0
                        26 January 2019 19: 20
                        I have been doing this for 25 years countering sabotage.
                        And why most of the saboteurs considered themselves "true communists", but were trained in the IRA camps.
                      10. -1
                        26 January 2019 19: 22
                        These are ultra-left European extremists, from whom the Union denied itself with arms and legs. laughing All sorts of things like Baaden-Meinhof.
                      11. 0
                        26 January 2019 19: 25
                        Taliban and ISIS - also
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        ultra-left European extremists

                        ? By the way, even Rohm noted that the most numerous of the world parties are the Trotskyists. The unfinished "Burning Continent".
                      12. +1
                        26 January 2019 19: 33
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Baaden-Meinhof

                        By the way, yes. We know little about them; in the press they often confuse the "Red Army Faction" with the "Red Brigades".
                        Americans often confuse them with the IRA.
                      13. -1
                        26 January 2019 19: 36
                        IRA Amers do not confuse with anyone, because the sympathies of the local Irish community were on their side
                      14. 0
                        26 January 2019 19: 52
                        Alas, there are several American films where the "Red Army men" appear as the IRA. I can hardly remember the names. But scarecrows.
                      15. 0
                        26 January 2019 20: 07
                        laughing Confused - Red Army - IRA
                      16. 0
                        25 January 2019 22: 23
                        sogdy (sogdy)
                        "By the way, both past and present politicians stubbornly confuse communism and Trotskyism. The latter is a variation of anarcho-syndicalism without a scientific base, by the way, which smashes into smithereens the hype ideas of anarchism, which permeate both the white movement and its remnants such as liberalism."

                        I don't understand anything, anarchism-Trotskyism-white movement-liberalism !? Explain, too. All right, Comrade T'otsky, he is far away, but the liberals do not even know! Tell us how they ended up in one group?
                      17. 0
                        26 January 2019 19: 10
                        Quote: Viknt
                        Nich-cho did not understand

                        Whose will you be?
                      18. -1
                        27 January 2019 16: 49
                        which ones do you like more? Anarchism in the process actually interests me.
                      19. 0
                        29 January 2019 13: 35
                        Quote: Viknt
                        Anarchism in the process actually interests me.

                        My grandfather, under the command of the anarchist, fought with other anarchists and not only.
                        So shta "anarchism in progress" is not interesting to us. Moreover, the anarchists do not differ from the sectarians in combat terms. Unless they cease to be anarchists.
                      20. 0
                        29 January 2019 21: 44
                        If you are not interested in anarchism, this does not mean that anarchism is not interested in you. Your grandfather was interested in anarchism as a tool. Your grandfather has you, the question is, who is anarchism now?
                      21. 0
                        30 January 2019 10: 09
                        As I understand it, you have never met real anarchism. Especially where the "prosecutor is a bear". And everything always comes back to Kropotkin.
                      22. 0
                        30 January 2019 16: 01
                        this "real" anarchism did not meet with me, more hands are short. In fact, you obviously have nothing to say. It's a pity. It's you, you called the liberals anarchists, and the whole country looked at the real guys accompanying them. Be simpler, do not be puffed up, you can be embarrassed solo. Not only you had a grandfather and not only he fought.
                      23. 0
                        31 January 2019 06: 59
                        Quote: Viknt
                        It’s you, you called the liberals anarchists, and the whole country looked at the accompanying real boys

                        Are "real" ones that are "extremely cool" in their exclusive environment? Those who are always ready to rob their own, for they will tear off their hands for strangers? How do they differ from the same "boys" 20-30s and late 40s? They didn't even come close to anarchism.
                        And Cherkasov, adnak, described the Makhnovshchina - the exclusive power of the elder. This is about "real guys".
                      24. 0
                        31 January 2019 19: 23
                        My graters and I abuse the attention of others, because this is not the topic of the article. Anarchy in its purest form, including without cerebral theories, is the complete chaos of all against all, their own and others. And the power of the elder is based on the power of the dominant male or female. Makhno is not the most anarchist anarchist. I can’t go into theoretical jungle, I’m simply not well-versed. As far as I know, Kropotkin was the greatest authority of the anarchist.
                      25. 0
                        3 February 2019 16: 12
                        Quote: Viknt
                        As far as I know, Kropotkin was the greatest authority of the anarchist.

                        Well, yes, Count Kropotkin, the city of Kropotkin, the basics of the theory of the fight against the Basmachi ...
      6. mvg
        +3
        23 January 2019 17: 28
        then this time will be 6 hours

        You don’t care plus, but they won’t be able to win, of course, in the Stone Age, yes .. but the Persians won’t win. At the same time, if without the support of the United States, they will wash themselves with blood ... it’s far to fly, without refueling it is unrealistic, and there are very few of them.
        A full-scale war cannot be pulled, it’s easier to see how the Turks, Arabs, Kurds, Russians bite each other, while pouring oil so that it does not go out ..
    4. +5
      23 January 2019 11: 49
      The problem is that other interested parties will immediately catch up.
      They are organizing a Storm in Desert - 2, and neither Syria nor Iran nor Russia has yet fallen.
      Nothing, be patient ...
      Time will come to collect stones.
      1. +1
        23 January 2019 13: 30
        Organize Desert Storm - 2,
        I doubt the military resource is not the same
    5. +5
      23 January 2019 16: 56
      Yes, the Israeli Air Force in this case will finally roll Syria - which is 80% already solid ruins.
      1. 0
        25 January 2019 15: 09
        Quote: Vadim237
        Israeli Air Force in that case

        Sorry, but the flight range of the designated Air Force?
    6. Maz
      -2
      23 January 2019 17: 43
      Given Israel’s GDP equal to almost a third of Russia's GDP and almost 4 yards of US aid, plus Israel’s integration into NATO, all plans of both Syria and Iran to try to weaken the Jewish state with a militaristic tone are manic delirium of mentally ill people. Iran is especially surprised with its problems in the economy. So, the fact that neither Syria nor Iran will be able to break through the multilevel and saturated air defense of Israel is already a fact and reality. And Israel, in turn, having such cover will continue to peck in Syria any objects that it attracts. We look forward to -300, the position of Lebanon and of course the actions of our president and the military in Syria. On diplomatic pressure, Israel simply hangs noodles on the ears, as in that proverb - And Vaska listens and eats ....
      1. -4
        23 January 2019 18: 56
        as soon as the "roof" leaks across the ocean and Israel will have big problems ...
      2. +1
        23 January 2019 19: 48
        Quote: Maz
        We look forward to -300, the position of Lebanon and of course the actions of our president and the military in Syria.

        With the current leadership of the Russian Federation, we are not expecting anything, otherwise they will not be allowed to go to Israel for treatment, and their health is sacred ... Yes
  2. +5
    23 January 2019 11: 25
    as long as there is a state of "God's chosen", there will be no peace in this region ... under the supervision of the United States, a murderous state has been raised in the region ... a state whose inhabitants are the descendants of Holocaust survivors, whatever you call it, and who also want to " repay "this world with murder ...
    1. +10
      23 January 2019 11: 32
      The same concentration overseers for the Arab World concentration camp were raised from the Jews.
      1. +6
        23 January 2019 11: 41
        Quote: bessmertniy
        for the concentration camp "Arab World".

        to the point! only instead of the barbed wire of the wall, instead of towers with UAV and satellite guards, and instead of gas chambers cruise missiles ...
    2. +9
      23 January 2019 11: 35
      The Saudis and the Qatars were also raised ... but some nations can only slaughter unarmed people ... and when they meet with the army, they run away and throw up modern weapons.
      1. +3
        23 January 2019 11: 49
        Quote: Zaurbek
        .a when meeting with the army run away

        well, yes, like the "chosen of God" who climbed into the territory of Lebanon, and when they received a more or less organized rebuff, they shamefully fled ...
        1. +1
          23 January 2019 11: 51
          They won a military victory. What else do they need to do? Occupy Lebanon and build a concentration camp there? Come and go, the question is what losses! Ours, too, for the New Year took Grozny.
          1. -3
            23 January 2019 15: 55
            Compare ... with a finger.
            1. +3
              23 January 2019 18: 19
              Terrible can not be compared with Lebanon?
              1. 0
                25 January 2019 22: 57
                Each has its own principle of comparison.
        2. +6
          23 January 2019 13: 41
          Quote: taiga2018
          Quote: Zaurbek
          .a when meeting with the army run away

          well, yes, like the "chosen of God" who climbed into the territory of Lebanon, and when they received a more or less organized rebuff, they shamefully fled ...

          How did you run? After the armistice, they remained on Lebanese territory for two months, watching how Hezbollah was being removed from the south of the country, these were the conditions of the armistice prayed by Lebanon. I like it so much when people who did not participate in it talk about that mess ...
          1. -1
            23 January 2019 15: 56
            Did you control this process?
            1. +3
              23 January 2019 16: 18
              No, our rezovist part of the ceasefire was demobilized, there are friends who were there after the ceasefire. By the way, Hezbollah’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon after the war was accompanied by skirmishes - with 200s and 300s on both sides. 2 bodies from ours and from 8 from Hezbollah.
      2. -2
        23 January 2019 15: 54
        Quote: Zaurbek
        and when meeting with the army, they run away and throw up modern weapons.

        Recall the Basmachi, eh, Zaur?
        Right, in the Civil and Patriotic War Siberians (including the Krasnoyarsk military Poles) and the northern peoples were required for the army to start shooting towards the enemy. Territorial troops - except for two Lithuanian battalions near Rivne - surrendered. And shot in our direction.
        1. +2
          23 January 2019 18: 17
          Remember the Basmachi ... I can cite the example of the Circassians and Russia in the Caucasus.
    3. +9
      23 January 2019 12: 45
      Quote: taiga2018
      chosen of God

      Do you have an understanding of what is "God's chosenness" in Judaism?
    4. 0
      25 January 2019 09: 19
      You tell this to the Europeans, who are beginning to reap the benefits, the flow of emigrants who have already raised their heads, and these are just flowers, and when they have their own Middle East, it's a matter of time.
  3. +11
    23 January 2019 11: 26
    Because in Damascus they’re not suicides, Russia is not the Union, it won’t help
  4. +7
    23 January 2019 11: 27
    Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv

    Because the entire "civilized" world will rush to defend Israel in one impulse. And then Syria-tryndets, like Assad. And he understands this very well.
    1. +4
      23 January 2019 11: 32
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv

      Because the entire "civilized" world will rush to defend Israel in one impulse. And then Syria-tryndets, like Assad. And he understands this very well.

      And if Russia had not intervened in 2015, would Assad not be Tryndets?
      1. +2
        23 January 2019 11: 35
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        And if Russia had not intervened in 2015, would Assad not be Tryndets?

        There would be no doubt. But it is one thing to fight ISIS on Syrian territory, and quite another to enter into direct confrontation with the "chosen by God." After all, some are just waiting for a pretext for war.
        1. +2
          23 January 2019 11: 38
          Quote: bouncyhunter
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          And if Russia had not intervened in 2015, would Assad not be Tryndets?

          There would be no doubt. But it is one thing to fight ISIS on Syrian territory, and quite another to enter into direct confrontation with the "chosen by God." After all, some are just waiting for a pretext for war.

          I agree. Well, forever, Israel will not shell Syria either. Sooner or later it will get its own.
          1. +3
            23 January 2019 11: 44
            Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
            Sooner or later, get yours.

            Better early than late. I'm pretty tired of them (I can't put it more bluntly) of their constant "we're just defending ourselves!" ...
            1. +2
              23 January 2019 11: 45
              Quote: bouncyhunter
              Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
              Sooner or later, get yours.

              Better early than late. I'm pretty tired of them (I can't put it more bluntly) of their constant "we're just defending ourselves!" ...

              Well, I figuratively put it. How sooner or later no one knows.
    2. 0
      23 January 2019 12: 04

      Quote: bouncyhunter
      Because the entire "civilized" world will rush to defend Israel in one impulse. And then Syria-tryndets, like Assad. And he understands this very well.

      . UN General Assembly asked Israel from the Golan Heights
      On November 26, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution requiring the occupying authorities of Israel to leave the Syrian Golan before the line on June 4, 1967 in accordance with the UN Security Council resolution on this issue. The UNGA confirmed that the continued occupation of the Golan is an obstacle to a just and comprehensive peace in the region.
      The UN condemned Israel’s failure to comply with UN Security Council Resolution No. 497 of 1981. The decision on the annexation of the Syrian Golan, adopted on December 14, 1981, contradicts international law, and UN Security Council resolution No. 497 confirmed the illegality of such a move.
      112 countries voted for this resolution. This is a confirmation of the basic principles of international law and the UN Charter, in particular, on the inadmissibility of the appropriation by force of territories of another state.

      It is not yet known what the world will say.
      1. +2
        23 January 2019 13: 56
        Quote: 1810BM86
        It is not yet known what the world will say.
        About Crimea or what? They clearly spoke out. Do you need a number?
  5. 0
    23 January 2019 11: 34
    Now, and in the near future, neither Iranians nor Syrians can aim at military targets in Israel ... And the strike will be perceived throughout the world as a strike on the civilian population ...
    A strike can be struck only when Iran decides to hit the target with high accuracy. And here it will be difficult for Israel to begin a ground operation. And the forces of Iran with its hundreds of BRs (already with a conventional warhead) will already become really dangerous for Israel .... And the determination of the Jews to kill the Iranians will become less.
  6. -6
    23 January 2019 11: 37
    Israel must be destroyed!
    1. +9
      23 January 2019 11: 42
      Just not at our expense, here in the country business for tonsils! Destroy your personal savings please. Yes
      1. -2
        23 January 2019 11: 45
        Well, if there is a fundraiser for such a good deed, I will not pass by.
        1. +5
          23 January 2019 11: 49
          Orthodox Jews to help you, but more wassat
          1. +5
            23 January 2019 13: 44
            If Israel continues to bomb Syria, I won’t go to work tomorrow !! (Like yesterday, like today laughing )
            1. +1
              23 January 2019 14: 10
              Quote: Krasnodar
              I won’t go to work tomorrow !!

              Krasnodar, I have a business idea for you, create a fund to eradicate Zionism all over the world, and here some citizens promise not to ignore fundraising for such a good deed, but they don’t know where to pay money! fellow
              Of course, the matter is not simple, the reports there are different, but this and that, but the gesheft promises to be not weak, but the prospect is finally breathtaking! wink
              1. +4
                23 January 2019 14: 15
                Why difficult? An ordinary non-profit organization, you need to look under the law, how many attendants from the collected can be spent on salary and that's all)). Accounting is simple - income - expenses tax free, as far as I understand. The tax is likely to go to salaries. Business then laughing I take a share drinks
                1. +1
                  23 January 2019 15: 36
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  I take a share

                  In this case, the headache is removed from you for the name of the organization, I have such (yes, you probably remember how I beat Rabinovich to create a transfer company on the border of Syria and Israel), by the way, and the share of participation in the case is clear, - will this go? bully
                  1. +5
                    23 January 2019 15: 37
                    With a goy in half - still a find))
                2. +2
                  23 January 2019 18: 23
                  If Che, I share !!!
                  1. +2
                    23 January 2019 18: 28
                    Easily hi
                    Protests at SOHO ROOMS, (I wonder, is he still alive?) Working sessions at White Robbit
                    The fight against Zionism is expensive, but the goal is noble.
                    1. +2
                      23 January 2019 18: 38
                      Spit on the nobility! How Mach? laughing
                      1. +3
                        23 January 2019 18: 42
                        With us - nothing))
                        We collect money from sympathizers of this noble goal and spend on:
                        1) Lease of protest venues in Moscow clubs
                        2) Meetings in Moscow (you can St. Petersburg) restaurants
                        3) Salaries to three activists
                        4) Maintenance of the site sionizmunet.co.il (do not disturb on Shabbat).
                        5) Calling random citizens to saunas at night to carry out outreach
                      2. +1
                        23 January 2019 19: 42
                        Well, here again: Moscow, Moscow .... Everything can be done much cheaper and more efficiently. There are meadows, the border of settled areas and 101 km at the same time. Why not feti ... Sorry, symbol? Again, the authorities are clean, we are investing money in the regions.
                      3. +1
                        23 January 2019 19: 45
                        Let's do it in the Crimea! Patriotic)).
                      4. +1
                        23 January 2019 19: 55
                        I understand you are closer and warmer there. Let's get together in Cyprus (I will thaw, but you will not get used to it). Well, offshore, again, is very patriotic.
                      5. +2
                        23 January 2019 19: 56
                        By the way, a shop was closed in the Seychelles - every three months, in my opinion, one must come there personally.
                      6. +1
                        23 January 2019 20: 03
                        Closed in the Seychelles - will open on Franz Josef Land (with "blackjack" and shl ...). You have to work somehow.
                      7. +1
                        23 January 2019 20: 17
                        Well, offshore topic is fun))
                        By the way, what is heard from Kaliningrad? Did they open it?
                      8. 0
                        23 January 2019 20: 36
                        Schazzz !!! Too many people interested.
                      9. +2
                        23 January 2019 20: 39
                        I heard about tax breaks in Crimea
                      10. 0
                        23 January 2019 20: 44
                        Honestly, I also heard about a piece of land within a megalopolis as a matkap from you.
                      11. +1
                        23 January 2019 22: 36
                        This is not a matkap - this is for the third and fourth, like, child at the place of registration. It is given, as a rule, on the outskirts of the city.
        2. +3
          23 January 2019 11: 56
          help better "nearby" pensioners or veterans, otherwise you are ready to throw yourself against Israel and on the wall from Chechnya - to see the money does not peck chickens !!!
          1. +1
            23 January 2019 11: 57
            It’s cheaper to kill the militants in Syria than to drive across the North Caucasus.
          2. +3
            23 January 2019 12: 02
            Quote: nikolai.kolya
            help better "nearby" retirees or veterans

            This is five points! good
            1. -3
              23 January 2019 13: 16
              This is + 100500 points! lol
        3. +3
          23 January 2019 13: 59
          I will give you parabellum. We will retreat to the mountains. Can you cover us?
          - I can not...
          - Почему?
          - You see, I am completely unfamiliar with military affairs, but I can provide all possible financial assistance.
          - You are a true friend of the fatherland!
          - I think two hundred rubles ...
          - Five hundred rubles can save a giant of thought.
          “Tell me, can't two hundred rubles save a giant of thought?”
          - I believe that bargaining is inappropriate here! (C)
    2. +3
      23 January 2019 13: 20
      Quote: MoJloT
      Israel must be destroyed!

      Israel must never be destroyed!
  7. -8
    23 January 2019 11: 38
    In such a situation, there will be no "massive strikes" against Israel. But Damascus may well embroider military and military-technical contacts with Tehran, so that Israel is constantly in a "military tone" and spend forces and funds on militarization.

    Are they sewn up? the Assad simply does not need to let Islamists into its territory and then no one will bomb them in Syria.
    1. -2
      23 January 2019 11: 42
      Israel does not need to heal, equip and train Islamists. And I believe Israel should be destroyed.
      1. -1
        23 January 2019 11: 53
        Quote: MoJloT
        Israel does not need to heal, equip and train Islamists. And I believe Israel should be destroyed.

        So what ? And many Ukrainians want the Russian Federation to be destroyed. And how does it promote your dreams?
        1. 0
          23 January 2019 13: 15
          And many Ukrainians want the Russian Federation to be destroyed
          The attitude of many Ukrainians and the national hero of Bandera is to us, that to you is the same.
        2. -3
          23 January 2019 19: 59
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          And many Ukrainians want the Russian Federation to be destroyed.

          But don’t you participate in this?
      2. +4
        23 January 2019 13: 47
        Quote: MoJloT
        Israel does not need to heal, equip and train Islamists. And I believe Israel should be destroyed.

        Both the peaceful man and Assad are being treated. And for the grandmother of the Israeli taxpayer. But to arm and train is something new)))
    2. +10
      23 January 2019 11: 58
      professor (Oleg Sokolov) Today, 11:38 "Assad simply does not need to let Islamists into its territory, and then no one will bomb them in Syria."

      And where does Israel?
      What to do Assad is not your business
      Syria's right to do what it wants on its territory
      This is her sovereign right. This is Syrian territory.
      And it is not prohibited by international laws.

      Does Israel have the right to bomb objects on foreign territory, even under good reason?
      Israel does not have international law, just as other states do not have it. Without a UN decision.
      Anger at anger is no better solution to problems.
      Blood for blood generates even more blood. .and anger .. And so on ad infinitum
      The time will come. When Iran or Syria will be stronger and more powerful than Israel. As in history many times
      So what ?
      1. +6
        23 January 2019 12: 09
        Quote: To be or not to be
        And where does Israel?
        What to do Assad is not your business
        Syria's right to do what it wants on its territory
        This is her sovereign right. This is Syrian territory.
        And it is not prohibited by international laws.

        Prohibited. Did you not know that supporting terror is an international crime?

        Quote: To be or not to be
        Does Israel have the right to bomb objects on foreign territory, even under good reason?

        Our peacekeepers are forcing a neighboring country to peace. Such incidents in the world have already been.

        Quote: To be or not to be
        Israel does not have international law, just as other states do not have it. Without a UN decision.

        Are you talking about Russia in 2008 or in 2014?

        Quote: To be or not to be
        Blood for blood generates even more blood. .and anger .. And so on ad infinitum
        The time will come. When Iran or Syria will be stronger and more powerful than Israel. As in history many times
        So what ?

        And then maybe they have enough mind not to fight, but to be friends. Let them take an example from Jordan, Egypt, Chad, Morocco, Oman, Bahrain ...
        1. -3
          23 January 2019 14: 01
          Professor (Oleg Sokolov) Today, 12: 09
          1. "Did you not know that supporting terror is an international crime?"
          -I know even from whom the terror went
          Accidentally not from the state of young Israel ???
          2 "Our peacekeepers are forcing the neighboring country to peace. There have already been such precedents in the world."
          -The existence of a strong Syria governed = at about PEACE for Israel But the impression that you do not need peace There will be no handouts ...
          3. "Are you talking about Russia in 2008 or 2014?"
          -See your first "supporting terror is an international crime?"
          To shoot the Russian peacekeepers sleeping is what? From hail to shoot around the city is that ?? For sleeping old children.
          What would the State of Israel do in response to this? Cast Lead .. or better?
          2014 year, would you be silent modestly then, God forbid, the role of Israel will emerge?
          4. Let them take an example from Jordan, Egypt, Chad, Morocco, Oman, Bahrain ... "
          -Israel has no right to teach what to do to other nations. Live in peace. And others with peace will come to you
          1. +4
            23 January 2019 18: 38
            Quote: To be or not to be
            1. "Did you not know that supporting terror is an international crime?"
            -I know even from whom the terror went
            Accidentally not from the state of young Israel ???

            No, not from Israel.

            Quote: To be or not to be
            -The existence of a strong Syria governed = at about PEACE for Israel But. The impression that you do not need peace There will be no handouts ..

            We want Syria to be strong, therefore we bomb the Islamists in Syria.

            Quote: To be or not to be
            -See your first "supporting terror is an international crime?"
            To shoot the Russian peacekeepers sleeping is what? From hail to shoot around the city is that ?? For sleeping old children.
            What would the State of Israel do in response to this? Cast Lead .. or better?

            1. Russian troops did not have a UN peacekeeping mandate.
            2. From Gradov to shoot at YOUR city is "establishing constitutional order." How are you in Grozny.
            3. The state of Israel withdrew from Lebanon and from gases.

            Quote: To be or not to be
            2014 year, would you be silent modestly then, God forbid, the role of Israel will emerge?

            In squeezing the Crimea? How can something that does not exist and does not exist?

            Quote: To be or not to be
            -Israel has no right to teach what to do to other nations. Live in peace. And others with peace will come to you

            We take an example from other "forcing peace".
            1. -5
              23 January 2019 19: 16
              Smiled! No more...
        2. -1
          23 January 2019 20: 01
          Quote: professor
          Did you not know that supporting terror is an international crime?

          Yes, yes! Why is Israel doing this? wink
    3. +1
      23 January 2019 13: 17
      Quote: professor
      on the territory of Syria.

      Rumor has it that Israel decided to become a gas boiler?
    4. -3
      23 January 2019 17: 11
      Quote: professor
      the Assad simply does not need to let Islamists into its territory and then no one will bomb them in Syria.

      But how can Assad not wake up the Islamists when the Massad arms these Islamists and supports them in Syria? wassat
      Do you somehow agree between the IDF and the Massad, from the country it seems to be one and the goals are like opposite bully
  8. +4
    23 January 2019 11: 38
    Hedgehog it is clear that Israel will not invade Syria, and the option “Bombing of Yugoslavia 2” will be organized that the puppets from terrorist organizations could not do will be done by the owners themselves.
    There, the United States, England, Australia, Canada, France, the Baltic states with Poland will be pulled ... and they will simply destroy the country. Will manage nothing and how.
    If Iran has the resources not to defeat, but to cause unacceptable damage, then Syria does not. And rightly they do that they are not drawn in.
    But what Israel is thinking about, inciting self-hatred is difficult to judge, it is clear that there is some trump card up its sleeve. But as you know, for every tricky bolt ....
    So far the conclusion is this, another multi-step project has been started, which will become clear in a year and a half. The peak must be repelled and minimize losses.
    1. +1
      23 January 2019 17: 12
      Quote: arhPavel
      There, the USA, England, Australia, Canada, France, the Baltic states with Poland ...

      inconsistency. these devils just fell from Syria.
  9. -3
    23 January 2019 11: 39
    The dismantling of the state of Israel is more likely the dismantling of the states of Syria and Iran. It is beneficial for the owners of the Jews to feed Israel to the Arabs. Whether the clairvoyance of Israel’s hands is enough to push the fifth point is a question.
    1. +4
      23 January 2019 11: 41
      Quite the opposite .... and the Arab spring showed it clearly.
      1. -1
        23 January 2019 11: 43
        She clearly showed supranational governance. Israel, too, is not ruled by Bibi. There are higher characters.
        Why won't Damascus hit Tel Aviv? Because Iran will hit.
        1. +5
          23 January 2019 11: 47
          And Iran will not hit.
          1. -2
            23 January 2019 11: 48
            Today she definitely won’t hit me; Ayatollah Khomeni called me, he says today we definitely won’t ... Sleep well. When the office is closed by employees, they are also told to the last that everything is in order, then they come to work one day, and the doors are closed ...
  10. -7
    23 January 2019 11: 40
    Assad is "delaying" his "end," but no matter how long it is, it will come anyway.
    1. +2
      23 January 2019 11: 50
      Quote: irazum
      Assad is "delaying" his "end," but no matter how long it is, it will come anyway.

      Have you measured two centuries for yourself? belay
      1. -4
        23 January 2019 11: 58
        No, so I am not Assad. He, like his cannibal dad, wants to rule Syria until his death, but "rules" already in fact, no longer its largest part. Further, for him, it will only get worse.
        1. +2
          23 January 2019 12: 18
          A set of stamps got enough sleep. So if Dad transferred power in the country to his son, observing the illusion of democracy is bad. Whereas we will deal with lifelong senators and sons of senators in the USA, there have been no new people for only 100 years, only clans.
          That is why the ogre, with the help of weapons and the army, defended the country from collapse. Then how are “some” countries in which the police kill people, there the cities rebel for several months, a country that uses torture and the death penalty, which uses armed forces abroad without UN sanction.


          Really want stamps. It’s just that in some countries the screen is brilliant, and the tricks are more spectacular and things are even worse.
          1. -3
            23 January 2019 12: 26
            Let the States deal with life-long senators and the sons of senators. Why should we do something with them? What is it to us? And with Assad and Syria, the question is different: we put on the "lame horse" - Assad. And every day of this incomprehensible Syrian war costs our state a lot of money, which can be successfully spent on other purposes.
    2. +2
      23 January 2019 13: 27
      Quote: irazum
      Assad is "delaying" his "end," but no matter how long it is, it will come anyway.

      Assad pulled the end so that he began to attack him?
  11. -1
    23 January 2019 11: 46
    what there, in Washington
  12. -2
    23 January 2019 11: 57
    Israel just hits the weak, hits not hard, but intelligibly ...
  13. +2
    23 January 2019 12: 15
    Assad does not solve anything there. Too much is attributed to him. Just like Putin.
  14. 0
    23 January 2019 12: 16
    A question from the category "Why can't the second-grader Petya beat the commandos?" The question is rhetorical ...
    There is still a problem in Syria - the preconditions have appeared for taking with greater interest the hypothesis of the so-called "Round Earth" ...
  15. -4
    23 January 2019 12: 21
    Undoubtedly, Israel exists thanks to the support of the USA and this is not the primitive irrevocable money that comes to Israel every year. There are numerous connections and often corrupt, if you can call it domestic relations. Now Israel is a gendarme who bombes whoever needs and how much is needed, while he has huge political, economic, financial and, of course, military support. The United States famously lowered all possible opponents of Israel with colorful revolutions, and Syria is an example of this. If it weren’t for Russia, according to the US plan, there would be Libya and everyone around Israel in about the same condition. Only one Iran is not omitted and not plundered, but it is also severely crushed by sanctions and is pressed and dug under it. Amers also do not need a war, all the more uncontrolled, but they are very interested in ISIS or others who will arrange internecine wars and periodically omit even their allies such as Egypt and the Saudis. All Arabs are well aware that having a conflict with Israel, they are dealing with the United States.
  16. +1
    23 January 2019 12: 26
    Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv

    You can argue for a long and tedious reason: why? And you can short and capacious: the gut is thin. And not just Damascus.
    1. -5
      23 January 2019 13: 18
      And you can short and capacious: the gut is thin. And not just Damascus.
      laughing and who else besides Damascus?
      1. +1
        23 January 2019 14: 19
        Quote: flicker
        and who else besides Damascus?

        Moscow, of course. Of course, Russia did not fit in to fight for Syria against Israel, but the reputation is somehow suffering. The reputation of Russian air defense systems is particularly affected. How much noise was from the S-300, but in fact, Israel is pounding in Syria when and where it finds it necessary. This does not go unnoticed by the world community, alas ... Imagine: you are the father of a child, have come to school to find out how your child is studying. And then other guys started pounding your son. What do you say: I will not protect him, I did not come here for this reason?
    2. -2
      23 January 2019 17: 12
      And if you transfer Damascus to the Iskanders? :)
      1. +5
        23 January 2019 17: 16
        Oh well. And let's check the shell, checked. Yeshe and Iskander. Che to the heap to С300, 400. Maybe enough weapons to rattle.
      2. +4
        23 January 2019 22: 12
        And if you deal properly with internal Russian problems? There, in the Urals, schoolchildren fall into a hungry faint. Iskanders pass ...
  17. -2
    23 January 2019 12: 41
    Let's say Assad launches fifty Scuds. To dear neighbors; in reply.
    1. -1
      23 January 2019 12: 42
      And he says that he is ready to repeat for every raid.
      1. -1
        23 January 2019 12: 46
        And what will happen in Israel? BBC on the British flag their own Jews tear.
        Ground operation? I doubt it deeply.
        After the hundredth Asodov rocket, the Jews themselves will offer a peace treaty.
        1. +4
          23 January 2019 13: 53
          In the history of Israel, Jews have never proposed a peace treaty ...
          1. -1
            23 January 2019 14: 03
            Golden words, here it is the essence of you, but the skads have miraculous properties.
            1. +4
              23 January 2019 14: 19
              I mean, since 1948, the Jews have never offered a truce to end hostilities. Everywhere and always fit the UN. Everywhere and always for the salvation of the Arabs and at the initiative of the Arabs.
          2. -2
            23 January 2019 14: 32
            In the history of Israel, Jews have never proposed a peace treaty ...
            Israel does not seem to have such a long history.
            Well Duc, it’s clear, 2000 years wandering around the world, what kind of peace treaty can be discussed.
            1. +4
              23 January 2019 21: 54
              Quote: flicker
              Israel does not seem to have such a long history.
              Well Duc, it’s clear, 2000 years wandering around the world, what kind of peace treaty can be discussed.

              How to say. The Hittites, Asyrians, Greeks, Babylonians, and even the Romans did not offer peace.
              even when the opponent pulled in full.
              a couple of thousand years passed, and all of them got a trace and the Jews are all here.
              you don’t worry about this, nature is such hi
              1. -2
                23 January 2019 22: 34
                a couple of thousand years passed, and all of them got a trace and the Jews are all here.
                So what about the history of Israel or the history of the Jews?
                1. +2
                  23 January 2019 23: 29
                  Quote: flicker
                  So what about the history of Israel or the history of the Jews?


                  Do you think that there is a difference between the two?
              2. 0
                25 January 2019 23: 10
                By the way, p nature. "Everything is here" is where and how much? I have never met about the genome of the Jews, tell us, what relation do modern "Jews" have to Solomon? Why is Hebrew one of the German dialects? Well, but about the Hittites, for example, the Hittite texts begin with "Well," does it remind you of anything? Where has Greece gone?
                1. 0
                  26 January 2019 19: 12
                  Quote: Viknt
                  Why is Hebrew one of the German dialects?

                  Patamushta Hebrew is not Yiddish.
                  Sorry, is there anything worth discussing with you?
                  1. -1
                    27 January 2019 16: 52
                    I forgive, I do not serve in a poor spirit.
  18. -5
    23 January 2019 12: 49
    The outcome of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad.
    Good tale to calm the Israelis. bully
    But Israel will not be from the word at all.
    The current Israel is not able to cope with Hezbollah.
    In the event of a military conflict, the growth of Israeli territory will not be averse to Egypt and Jordan, Turkey and the CA will actively help them.
    Israel has no chance, just negotiate bully
    1. +1
      23 January 2019 13: 21
      An interesting opinion of the Martian!
    2. +6
      23 January 2019 13: 35
      Quote: flicker
      The current Israel is not able to cope with Hezbollah.

      You say nonsense
      1. -3
        23 January 2019 14: 36
        You say nonsense
        this is not my opinion. These are the conclusions of the military leadership of the IDF, after the last war with Hezbollah.
        After that, Israel’s tactics changed: the rejection of ground operations, pinpoint strikes with rockets and the iron dome in response to the shelling.
        1. +3
          23 January 2019 14: 50
          Quote: flicker
          this is not my opinion. These are the conclusions of the military leadership of the IDF, after the last war with Hezbollah.
          After that, Israel’s tactics changed: the rejection of ground operations, pinpoint strikes with rockets and the iron dome in response to the shelling.

          Again, I repeat - you are talking nonsense.

          The main conclusion after the Second Lebanon War was that it was a mistake to assume that everything can be solved by a distance war. NGSH was then Dan Halutz, the first NGSH came from aviation. The Lebanese war perfectly showed that the war is being kicked off.

          And the additional conclusions were that they too hoped for a technology component, and they forgot about logistics and training. + A certain underestimation of the preparation and arming of the enemy. But not more.
          1. -5
            23 January 2019 15: 10
            Again, I repeat - you are talking nonsense.
            Do not mislead the public. Previously, Israel responded with a ground operation in response to shelling. After the 2006 Hezbollah War, Israel’s tactics changed. Damage to the enemy through rocket attacks, defense against reciprocal missiles - missile defense, iron dome (in operation since 2011).
            1. +2
              24 January 2019 00: 35
              It seems that you are talking nonsense ......
              After the war with Israel, Hezbollah sits below the grass and there was no shelling ... Hezbollah leader sits in the bunker and does not appear.
              If before, Israel didn’t destroy the homes of the Hezbollah terrorists, from where the rockets flew, then in the next war, Israel doesn’t care where they shoot from ..... Hezbollah knows this and does not stick out ...
    3. +3
      23 January 2019 14: 03
      Quote: flicker
      The outcome of this direct military conflict will be (at least in the Syrian direction) obvious - the dismantling of the government of the SAR with the possible end of the presidency of Bashar al-Assad.
      Good tale to calm the Israelis. bully
      But Israel will not be from the word at all.
      The current Israel is not able to cope with Hezbollah.
      In the event of a military conflict, the growth of Israeli territory will not be averse to Egypt and Jordan, Turkey and the CA will actively help them.
      Israel has no chance, just negotiate bully

      Yehhh, you do not listen to Asisi, who rules Egypt. Listen to what he says about Israel, then sign for Egypt.
      1. -2
        23 January 2019 14: 14
        don't you listen to Asishi
        So the point is not in it, but in the depths of the conflict between Arabs and Jews. Situationally, they may seem like good neighbors, but in the depths ...
        1. +3
          23 January 2019 14: 35
          Quote: flicker
          don't you listen to Asishi
          So the point is not in it, but in the depths of the conflict between Arabs and Jews. Situationally, they may seem like good neighbors, but in the depths ...
          With the exact opposite, just in depth they conspire. I tell you, listen to Asishi.
          1. -1
            24 January 2019 09: 26
            just in the depths they conspire
            That's exactly what is conspired in the "depth". And why in the "depth"? Because the Arabs (broader Muslims) will not understand this and will not forgive.
    4. 0
      23 January 2019 16: 26
      Iran began the transfer of units across Iraq.
      When the fun begins, the people from Russia will catch up.
      1. 0
        23 January 2019 16: 30
        Protect Syria.
        1. 0
          23 January 2019 16: 32
          I'm on some kind of blacklist. Just starting to write - the site turns off.
  19. 0
    23 January 2019 13: 20
    A competent article, in the root. Sometimes I wonder if the Iranians on every corner did not remember Israel, which they actually do care, what would happen then? Iran needs Israel as part of its domestic policy of intimidation and incentives for its people. They make a lot of noise, because of that, Israel is cowardly and bombers every fly. Can the Persians stop trembling? Just do not worry! Or do they also tremble on an order from Israel? Ayatollahs then came to power with the help of the United States, go know what kind of birds they are!
    1. -3
      23 January 2019 14: 38
      Or do they also tremble on an order from Israel?
      In response to the trepidation from Israel.
    2. -1
      23 January 2019 16: 35
      I have been to Iran. Talk about Israel there begins after the bombing in Syria.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. -3
    23 January 2019 13: 45
    This morning an article was published on the statement of the Foreign Minister of Syria
    Damascus spoke about a possible retaliatory strike at the Tel Aviv airport
    , which so alarmed the Jewish public, that they had to urgently launch a sedative pill in the form
    Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv
    bully
    It’s just going to strike, when they were also sure that they wouldn’t deliver the S-300 ... so what?
    Once again, they will strike if the Jews do not calm down their leadership!
  22. +1
    23 January 2019 13: 47
    Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv
    Because no one in advance warns of a retaliatory attack, they just shoot, they want to and so may be ..... smile
    1. -3
      23 January 2019 14: 22
      Because no one in advance warns of a return attack
      But what about the instruction: "Stop, I will shoot!", After which they shoot warning and then to kill.
  23. +2
    23 January 2019 13: 48
    Quote: Leshy1975
    Trampled, after Syria, and Iran in the Stone Age. Aviation and missiles. And if you need a certain amount of "cannon fodder", then they will recruit from among Iran's opponents at the BV

    That's what you are being minus for? I agree 100%
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. 0
    23 January 2019 14: 27
    Such a sluggish war will go on and on: Israel will bomb sheds, sometimes really military targets. Iran to bring weapons and soldiers to Syria. Maybe in the spring they’ll finally shoot the S-300. Netanyahu will leave, unlike Assad. Sooner or later, Israeli planes will bring down or cover the civilian side, because no matter what ace you are, mistakes and inaccuracies happen. Naturally, there will be nothing for Israel.
  26. +3
    23 January 2019 14: 31
    Why Damascus does not strike Tel Aviv

    Because at the best of times, even when the six of them gathered together and being at the peak of their economic and military development, the Arab countries completely poured into Israel. If this "feat" itself tries to repeat the war-torn and living at the expense of Iranian grandmothers part of Syria controlled by Assad, then the result is somewhat predictable.
  27. +2
    23 January 2019 15: 04
    Israel spends effort and money on militarization without it
  28. -1
    23 January 2019 15: 10
    Israel provides a good opportunity to improve Syria’s air defense systems without destroying them. So you need to learn how to counteract with minimal costs, saturate your defense with countermeasures, improve the electronic warfare and air defense systems (do not forget about reconnaissance), and the time will come when even Jews will respect Syrian sovereignty. Yes expensive and expensive, but life is not an easy thing.
  29. -2
    23 January 2019 15: 31
    Why won't Damascus and Tehran hit Tel Aviv ??? BECAUSE Israel has NUCLEAR WEAPONS
    1. 0
      23 January 2019 17: 13
      Is Israel ready to use it? This open the Pandora’s box ..... but everyone wants to live
    2. 0
      23 January 2019 17: 40
      And do not know that the Pakistani generals promised Iranian to transfer something for the war with the United States or Israel?
    3. -1
      23 January 2019 22: 56
      they did not survive from the mind.
      Israel will not need nuclear weapons.
  30. +1
    23 January 2019 16: 01
    My opinion is that behind the launch of the missile there is a "third force", someone really wants to start a war on the BV. Some of my colleagues get that the United States, but it seems to me that this is not so: at the moment Riyadh is happening in parallel in Syria, perhaps even profitable, and if the Arab-Israeli war starts, they will have to listen to the opinion of the "street", and Israel is not loved there (and why so?). This will worry Washington.
    Perhaps this missile is aimed more at SA. It is possible that one of the heirs to the throne is also involved. They are ALL spoiled by money, and money always wants more.
    Back in the USSR, I read "Science and Religions" Islamic shrines are located in the SA and the royal entourage is used to benefit from this. The French say: "go woman", and I say: "look for money"
    PS
    I fully admit that someone wants to pit us against the Americans. Everything is very, very confusing. Roma is right "the devil is in the little things"
  31. -2
    23 January 2019 17: 20
    Israel will smash Syria one-on-one, I don't see any options here. But Iran will fit right in here. Against such a giant in the Middle East, Israel can no longer resist, no matter how powerful its army. The Iranians can simply throw rockets at them. In a small Israeli territory, there will be many explosions and almost in one place.
    But then what will be done with Iran ... well, that's another question. Throw hundreds of 3 good rockets, and once in 10, the Iranians are no longer so good and their henchmen will have time, I think.
    1. +1
      23 January 2019 22: 55
      Israel cannot resist Israel against such a giant in the Middle East

      you are sure, but Iran thinks differently.
      1. -1
        24 January 2019 14: 42
        Iranian representatives made statements from which it can be concluded that Iran thinks so.
        1. +1
          24 January 2019 15: 12
          to make statements, not toss the bags ....
          1. 0
            24 January 2019 15: 39
            Once you deny the existence of meaning in statements, then what are you generally guided by, speaking about what others think?
            1. 0
              24 January 2019 15: 42
              statements of discord
  32. +1
    23 January 2019 19: 26
    The history of the USSR has taught nothing to anyone. Catastrophically impoverished population, fainting children. Why got involved in the conflict in Syria? It seems that the fate of Raska awaits us ...
    1. +2
      23 January 2019 20: 05
      Quote: artur78
      History of the USSR

      Quote: artur78
      It seems that the fate of Raska awaits us ...

      A masterpiece! laughing
  33. +1
    23 January 2019 19: 39
    Because objectively cannot
  34. 0
    23 January 2019 19: 51
    If ours are afraid, what can we say about poor Syria, although they have long been asked for it.
  35. +2
    23 January 2019 20: 05
    Quote: Shurik70
    To help Assad, it is not necessary to provoke him into a war, but to test our air defense "in conditions close to combat." And if you only shoot down the missiles, it will never end. It is necessary to shoot down the planes that launch these missiles. This is for the first time.
    And for the future, we need a ground-to-ground missile system, and ground-to-air missile system that will destroy not only missiles with shells, but also launchers AUTOMATICALLY. Put such along the border and warn.

    It means getting involved in a war similar to Afghanistan. our contingent was introduced to Syria to confront ISIS, and not to support the struggle of Syria with its neighbors. Read the relevant documents on the website of our Foreign Ministry. Shooting down Israeli planes with our complexes (with our personnel) - this means becoming a participant in this long-playing war, which we absolutely do not need
    missile system "surface-to-ground" what is it? Iskander? are you sure they will not be "taken out", hand them over to Syria? Destroying launchers automatically? Can you tell me what this ultra-top-secret and ultra-modern Russian system is that can do this? do not clothe your fantasies in pseudo-reality. There is no such system at the tactical level and is not expected.

    Quote: Kent0001
    Israel needs to be firmly put in place ... and even in response to the death of our children, we did nothing, and there, just a moment, very high-class specialists were killed.

    Our guys were shot down by the cross-handed anti-aircraft gunners of Syria, not the Israeli air defense. Someone, of course, wants to play war, especially if they know that there, in the "sandbox" they will not end up, but will sit at home in front of the monitors. Are we at war with Israel? No. War with Israel in Syria and illegal Iran. Do you want our "200" cargo? let Syria deal with its own problems. By and large, our contingent has fulfilled its task. Broke the back of ISIS. And then - the problems of Syria. No one signed up to solve the problem with the surrounding countries with the lives of their soldiers and officers

    Quote: flicker
    Well, Jews lived without a state for 2000 years, and now they have such a cool state.
    So Muslims, gained experience, weapons, hatred of Jews, they always had enough. So that ... bully

    So that? Never mind. History shows that we like it or not, but Israel has always beaten its neighbors. Yes, there were situations when Israel was on the verge, but always came out victorious. Learn the history of comrades. At one time, the UN gave a year to the creation of two states - the Palestinian and the Israeli. Palestinians have not created anything over this year. No government structure. Israel has created. And the day after the announcement of the creation of the state, Israel was aggressed by several states at once: Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq. Sound the result of this war? Or the result of the war of 1956, 1967, 1973 ??? And this despite the fact that Israel was inferior to its neighbors in terms of number of personnel and equipment. In certain situations, such as the wars of 1967 and 1973, only the intervention of the USSR and the sending of its contingent there (anti-aircraft gunners and aircraft) prevented the destruction of Egypt and Syria as states. And then someone dreams that now the Syrians will turn around and destroy Israel? Guys be realistic

    Quote: bayard
    To be above the fray, to mediate in negotiations, to trade in arms and just to trade - this is Russia's path in the Middle East meat grinder. And promote your interests.

    Weighted and realistic commentary

    Quote: Vita VKO
    Nothing brings people together so quickly as a common enemy, in this case Israel.

    And who will join the ranks of the fighters and Israel? Egypt has a peace treaty and it gets along well with Israel, even conducting joint actions against terrorists in the Sinai. Jordan will not and will not even try to wage a war with Israel. the territorial losses that it suffered in the 1948 war are enough for it. Iraq as an enemy to Israel is not at all from the word. Saudi Arabia. She already has problems over the roof to wage a war with Israel. In the underbelly, the Saudis have their own headache - the Houthis. And the main enemy of the KSA is not Israel, but a neighbor across the Gulf - Iran. So the Arabs have no common enemy here. In this regard, they have "confusion and vacillation" ...

    Quote: saturn.mmm
    Especially in the 2006 year in Lebanon with Hezbollah, fought, fought and flayed.

    War is war. ours were also beaten in the first Chechen war and we were forced to conclude the Khasavyurt agreement. And if in Lebanon Israel was not always lucky, then the result is now Lebanon "below the grass and quieter than water." And nothing can be done against Hezbollah, and against Israel.

    Quote: Pimply
    Are you aware that in all wars civilians are dying? In all, without exception. Any large-scale operation is in fact guaranteed losses among the civilian population, with significant losses.

    Not just significant, and sometimes at times large. The history of the Great Patriotic War is an example to us. The military losses of the Soviet Army EMNIP were about 10-11 million people, and civilian losses about 16 million. As a result, the USSR lost about 27 million in the war. Yes, and then for certain these figures are not absolutely accurate ...
    Especially now, when the means of destruction are mainly designed to inflict losses not on the troops, but on the rear, the population. For example, a fighter of one of the parties is unlikely to enter the position of the other side with the same bomb cartridges, knowing that it can be shot down. But to strike at a city where not only the rear structures of the army are concentrated, but also a significant number of civilians - this is easy ...

    Quote: SarS
    Let's say Assad launches fifty Scuds. To dear neighbors; in reply.

    "No, sonny, this is fantastic" (c)
    At the beginning of a serious stage of the conflict, that is, around 2015, Syria had 1 brigade of SCAD missile systems consisting of 18 launchers. How much is left by 2018, including and in a ready state no one can say (well, except perhaps the General Staff of the Syrian Armed Forces). In addition to that, it is unlikely that the whole brigade is concentrated in one place (against Israel). Most likely, the division’s action is planned in this direction, and this is 6 launchers. Intercepting 6 old missiles is not a big deal. The second launch is unlikely to be possible, since, according to the standards of the Soviet Army, the EMNIP was given about 25-30 minutes to reload the second-launch set of missiles. It is unlikely that the brave Syrian military could reduce this time. So the second launch could theoretically be made in 40-50 minutes, or an hour. And during this time, I'm afraid that the launchers would cease to exist ...
    1. -2
      23 January 2019 21: 07
      Well, not everything is as simple as you describe, firstly we have a reason for an armed response to Israel and this reason, the death of our military as a result of the provocation of the Yavrei and let them say what they want in their defense, it is enough to make a clear statement that that in the event of strikes on targets in Syria, where there is a threat to the lives of Russian citizens, the planes will go astray. Secondly, the impunity of the Yavrei gives them a desire to use weapons against a sovereign state more and more. If they want to fight Iran, then the flag is in their hands, but there is nothing to bomb the territory of another state. The Yavrei themselves are essentially invaders, and unlike the ghostly Russia in the Donbass, they are quite documented in the Golan Heights. And thirdly, the treacherous Khasavyurt agreements, on behalf of Yeltsin's "family", were signed by the fool Lebed, who was shocked by his own importance, just when Chechen militants were already scrambling, who were pressed to the mountains, freeing from them the entire lowland part of Chuchland and trapping them in Vedeno and Argun gorge. The signing of these agreements later led to grave consequences and thousands of casualties among our civilian population. Read less the memoirs of every kind of fall, like politkovskaya and corrupt politicians. There are participants in those events and not among the rank and file who are aware of how everything was in reality, tea is not Yermolov's times.
  36. -1
    23 January 2019 20: 47
    What makes it possible to bomb the territory of Syria with impunity? And where are all these international organizations, the UN, the Gang Dong and others ... It is clear that we don’t sniff at Israel, too many equations with the unknown are obtained, right up to a direct armed conflict with the jad dad, Uncle Sam. But somehow putting the Jews in their place is simply necessary, it is enough to recall their provocations that led to the death of our military. Apparently, it is necessary to shoot down Israeli planes, conditionally transferring the latest air defense to the Syrians and need to shoot down the more, the better, and at the same time check our new air defense systems in a combat situation.
  37. +2
    23 January 2019 22: 07
    Here I read all this nonsense (sorry) and even insulting for the people. Israel is doing Russia a great service by bombing Iran. Apparently the news does not reach you, but meanwhile, in Syria, Russia grappled with Iran. There, brother Assad is at war with you. While through Iranian proxies, the question is what will happen next. Here's yesterday's news of the 4th division, led by Maher Assad (and with the support of Iranian proxies) fought with the 8th division (controlled by Russia). At this stage, the conflict is escalating, the Iranians have sent a column of reinforcements, Russia has carried out a "simulated attack" on this column. Here they are your allies, who after the war are no longer allies, but rivals. Draw your own conclusions hi
    And yes, by the way, there are rumors that a few days ago Kassam Suleimani personally ordered to launch a missile in the Golan, he was visiting Damascus the other day ..
  38. +1
    23 January 2019 22: 38
    Just some more news. Russia is apparently preparing a change for Assad, since he and his brother were seen in the clear preference of Iran, and not Russia. Apparently, the candidate is Brigadier General Suheil Salman al-Hassan, well, the former deputy Assad Farouk a-Shara will most likely help him. Well, or swap them.
  39. 0
    23 January 2019 22: 53
    then will the Iranian forces really begin to deliver systematic attacks on Israeli territory?

    it is doubtful. they were forbidden to approach the border of Israel.
    If the prohibition is violated, an uncontrolled Damascus zone is formed there again.
    besides, the Jews bomb them constantly and do not allow them to accumulate strength
  40. +2
    24 January 2019 00: 38
    Quote: Mikhail Kokarev
    Ayatollahs then came to power with the help of the United States, go know what kind of birds they are!

    In more detail, you can ....... apparently possess classified materials that have never been published.
    Or they invented and believed ??
  41. -1
    24 January 2019 08: 35
    Israel has forgotten one simple truth. It is impossible to endlessly crap neighbors under the door. Sooner or later, but rather sooner, you either burn the house, or clean the bread, and perhaps both. The Middle East is a very close communal apartment. The opportunities of the countries surrounding Israel are growing, and patience is ending. I know reading the site. So the Jews, you yourself did not notice how, from a desire for a homeland, you degenerated into the worst version of those who spread rot. Do not be surprised at what can happen, this time you definitely deserve it. And as a Soviet Jew, I can tell you a few clever words - stop acting like suicidal scum. A disgust from what you are doing.
  42. +1
    24 January 2019 08: 41
    Perhaps the Martians are firing at Israel, from the gas sector and Syria ?!
  43. +2
    24 January 2019 14: 21
    Well done Jews, to death frightened Syria and half to death Russia, other than to explain the calm contemplation of Israeli air strikes on Syria in general and on Damascus in particular. But in fact, what prevents them from entering from the sea and hammering at our military bases? Never mind. The mind is incomprehensible.
    1. +2
      24 January 2019 14: 33
      Approximately also interferes with yours. Our plans do not include mutual destruction. Therefore, we swear, but we agree. The most beneficial strike of our aviation on the deployment of your contingent is precisely to the leadership of Iran. How funny it doesn't sound like.
  44. 0
    24 January 2019 23: 31
    the author did not take into account other countries in this mosaic
  45. -1
    24 January 2019 23: 52
    if Syria, as the Israeli authorities constantly declare, maintains an Iranian military presence on its territory

    What a canine affair of Israel, before that whom Syria supports on its territory?