Military Review

The Caspian Sea will guard a new ship with the Caliber-NK missile system

61

The composition of the Caspian flotation will soon include the Dagestan missile ship. Now the Project 11661K ship with the Caliber-NK missile system is completing state tests, most of which took place on the Black Sea. The commander of the Caspian said this at a meeting with the president of Dagestan, Magomedsalam Magomedov. flotilla Rear Admiral Sergey Alekminsky.

"The test results are positive," the flotilla commander said. "The ship is not bad with modern stuffing. Currently it is the most powerful ship in service of the Russian fleet. It has a missile system, the firing range of which is at surface targets 375 km, and at coastal targets - to 2 600 km. Such complexes with a powerful rocket weapons on surface ships in Russia yet, only on submarines. "

Approximately at the beginning of July the ship will go to the Caspian Sea, where the last tests will take place. After that, "Dagestan" will be fully accepted into the Russian Navy, the commander said.

The first presentation of the ship, said Alekminsky, will be held on the day of the Navy at the parade in Astrakhan.

"I am glad that one of the most powerful ships will be based here, on the Caspian Sea. This is important for our foreign friends, and for those who are not our allies, is a serious argument. The Caspian Sea and the Caucasus region as a whole today represent the intersection of the spheres of interests of different Therefore, Russia should have a powerful and combat-ready fleet here. I am sure that the Dagestan rocket ship and subsequent ships will increase this power, ”said the President of the Republic of Dagestan.

As noted, the flotilla already has a ship of this class, but with a slightly different weaponry - the "Tatarstan". This year the third small artillery ship Makhachkala, built by the shipbuilding firm Almaz in St. Petersburg, was launched. In the near future, the Caspian flotilla will qualitatively change and strengthen its ship composition, first of all with the advent of Dagestan.
Originator:
http://flot2017.com
61 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. pribolt
    pribolt 12 June 2012 11: 19
    +6
    Seven feet under the keel drinks
    1. Sakhalininsk
      Sakhalininsk 12 June 2012 11: 27
      +3
      support drinks
      1. Marat
        Marat 12 June 2012 20: 30
        +1
        I support - there are no guarantees that Iran and Syria will stand - and in the worst case - if the aggressor comes to the Caspian with weapons - this ship will not seem superfluous.
        The countries of the Eurasian Union need to strengthen themselves in the Caspian (I also support the leadership of my republic in strengthening our fleet - albeit small - but also assistance) - or the aggressor will come himself - or find "allies" in the Caspian countries - we must be ready - the Caspian is ours "inner lake" and only we should be the masters on it - one should not even allow the thought of the emergence of any "opposition force" in the Caspian
  2. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 12 June 2012 11: 26
    +3
    Ships need to be sent to Syria, and there will be enough forces on the Caspian.
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 12 June 2012 11: 37
      +3
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Ships need to be sent to Syria, and there will be enough forces on the Caspian.

      Sasha, the Caspian Sea has long been preventing someone from sleeping peacefully. Even taking into account "Dagestan" it will not be enough, you need to add more small things
    2. Kyrgyz
      Kyrgyz 12 June 2012 11: 47
      +2
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Ships need to be sent to Syria, and there will be enough forces on the Caspian.

      Syria is our long-time ally, of course, but I didn’t see their volunteers to suppress Chechen bandits, helping this ally is one thing, but solving his problems for him is completely different, and now we have no reason for that
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 12 June 2012 12: 02
        +3
        Kyrgyzstan, but not the Chechens. The fate of the world is decided in Syria, we will not defend Syria, we will ultimately fight on our territory, as usual. Do you think the amers in Syria and Iran will calm down.
        1. Kyrgyz
          Kyrgyz 12 June 2012 18: 20
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          The fate of the world is decided in Syria, we will not defend Syria, we will ultimately fight on our territory, as usual.

          Yes, she constantly decides somewhere that now close each embrasure? already closed, very expensive if in short, They did what they could in Syria, then let them figure it out ourselves, Syria is no more expensive for us than the Syrians themselves.
    3. Trailer
      Trailer 12 June 2012 13: 25
      +2
      Well, of course, I have enough strength. What about the option when the United States will wipe out Syria and Iran, and then come to the Caspian Sea. How will we meet them here? One "Tatarstan" and Astrakhan mosquitoes? So you need to build up your strength!
      1. VAF
        VAF 12 June 2012 16: 35
        +2
        Quote: Karavan
        How will we meet them here?


        How what ... what is usually ... because they, as always with us ... "will come unexpectedly" (well, like winter, for example, or floods ???)

        Well, we will meet them ...

        That's what they come with ....



        But with what we will meet ....







        Comment, I hope you do not need .... ???
        According to my opinion, without words everything is clear .... and you say RANGE ..... crying
        1. PLO
          PLO 12 June 2012 17: 22
          0
          ///////////////////////////////////
        2. PLO
          PLO 12 June 2012 17: 41
          +3
          or like this)


          1. VAF
            VAF 12 June 2012 19: 03
            +1
            Quote: olp
            or like this)


            Quite, +! Only here .... "sizes" are different -BIOS and wheelhouse .... !!! lol
            1. Alexey Prikazchikov
              Alexey Prikazchikov 12 June 2012 20: 32
              0
              Ships are different first photos of some junk and the second these cool corvettes that they will make.
              1. VAF
                VAF 12 June 2012 21: 31
                +1
                Quote: Alexey Prikazchikov
                first photos of some junk


                For important information, this junk is now in service, as the main form!
                And the only one!
                This is so .... by the way!
            2. MURANO
              MURANO 12 June 2012 20: 57
              0
              Quote: veteran.air force
              . "sizes" are different - BIOS and wheelhouse .... !!!

              Well, the chassis of the "Lumberjack" carriers is not the best. (But now it is improved - monitors of navigation systems and electronic maps have been added.)
              In general, if you look at their systems of the same year of creation as the Forest ..- there is little difference.
              1. VAF
                VAF 12 June 2012 21: 45
                0
                quote = MURANO] In general, if you look at their systems of the same year of creation as the Forest ..- there is little difference. [/ quote]

                The namesake, I'm sorry ... but the difference is SPACE !!!
                I am not very strong in the Navy, but I have been on ships ... on "excursions" ..... and what I have in the photo ... it is so now, maybe when the Granites are removed, they will put something another ... but for now .... what's on the Basalts, what's on the BIUS Volcanoes ... ... to say the least .... ancient ....!

                There are links printed down below .. dates, I hope you can clearly see ???

                And here in aviation, among the amers, the first IFIs appeared in the 70s, but do you know when ?????
                Therefore, I believe that the topic was closed ....
                And I ... it’s a shame for the power, but .... this is not for me !!!


                Aegis combat system ("Aegis", from the English. Aegis - "Aegis", the mythical shield of Zeus and Athena) is an American naval multifunctional combat information and control system (BIUS).

                In December 1969, work began in the United States to create a promising Aegis combat control system. It provides simultaneous tracking and destruction of targets on land, water, under water and in the air. A prototype system was installed on the USS Norton Sound (AVM 1) in 1973.

                The first ship equipped with the Aegis system, the USS Ticonderoga (CG-47), was added to the fleet lists on January 23, 1983. Vertical Launch (UVP) Mk41 was the first to receive the Bunker Hill (CG 52) missile cruiser. In total, 107 ships equipped with the Aegis system were adopted.

                The main element of the system is the AN / SPY-1A, B or D radar station with four flat phased antenna arrays (HEADLIGHTS) with a capacity of 5 MW, which performs the functions of a radar with a circular view. It is able to carry out automatic search, detection, tracking of 250-300 targets, and guidance on the most threatening of them to 18 missiles. The decision to defeat targets threatening the ship can be taken automatically.

                Computer control systems and decision support are the core of Aegis. They allow you to simultaneously solve the tasks of air defense, anti-submarine defense and strike at enemy ships. [Quote = MURANO] In general, if you look at their systems of the same year of creation as the Forest ..- there is little difference. [/ Quote]

                “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov” (former names - in the order of assignment - “Soviet Union” (draft), “Riga” (bookmark), “Leonid Brezhnev” (launching), “Tbilisi” (testing)) - heavy aircraft carrier Project 11435 cruiser, the only one in the Russian Navy in its class (as of 2012). Designed to defeat large surface targets, protect marine formations from attacks by a potential enemy. Belongs to the 1st rank of the ships of the Navy.

                Loading and mounting of weapons on an aircraft carrier (except for the zonal launch pad of the Granit rocket launcher), electrical equipment, aviation equipment, ventilation and air conditioning systems, as well as the equipment of the premises were carried out afloat, when the ship was being completed at the Northern Quay of the Big Bucket. [5 ]

                On August 11, 1987 it was renamed “Tbilisi”. On June 8, 1989, his mooring trials began, and on September 8, 1989, the crew settled. On October 21, 1989, an unfinished and understaffed ship was put out to sea, where it conducted a series of flight design tests of aircraft intended to be based on board it. As part of these tests, the first takeoffs and landings of aircraft on it were made. November 1, 1989 made the first landing of the MiG-29K, Su-27K and Su-25UTG. The first takeoff from it was made by the MiG-29K on the same day and the Su-25UTG and Su-27K the next day, November 2, 1989. After completing the test cycle, November 23, 1989 returned to the factory for completion. In 1990, he went to sea many times to conduct factory and state tests.

                On October 4, 1990 it was renamed once again (5th) and became known as the “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov”.
                1. MURANO
                  MURANO 13 June 2012 19: 30
                  +1
                  Quote: veteran.air force
                  and what I have in the photo ... it is now

                  Yes. But I meant that at the time of creation this technique did not look so different from the western one. Another thing is that they have "upgrades" and change of generations of electronics took place more often.
    4. 755962
      755962 12 June 2012 21: 03
      +1
      Quote: Alexander Romanov

      Ships need to be sent to Syria

      Yesterday, May 11, Russian warships were seen off the coast of Syria. An anonymous Russian source told the Tehran Times that Russia wants to show NATO that it will not tolerate any military intervention in Syria under the guise of a "humanitarian operation."http://nationalidea.am/news.php?id=15984&fl=y
  3. APASUS
    APASUS 12 June 2012 11: 29
    +2
    It has a missile system, the firing range of which on surface targets is 375 km, and on coastal targets - up to 2 km.

    I rummaged through everything here! Where does this range come from ??????????
    1. Tersky
      Tersky 12 June 2012 12: 37
      +2
      Quote: APASUS
      Where does this range come from ??????????

      Here is a digger, though infa is a bit old, -. The commander of the Caspian flotilla, Rear Admiral Sergey Alekminsky said this at a meeting with the President of Dagestan Magomedsalam Magomedov.

      "The test results are positive," the flotilla commander said. "The ship is not bad, with modern stuffing. At present, it is the most powerful ship in the armament of the Russian fleet. It has a missile system with a range of 375 km against surface targets, and against coastal targets. up to 2600 km. There are no more such complexes with powerful missile weapons in Russia, only on submarines. "
    2. VAF
      VAF 12 June 2012 12: 40
      +3
      Quote: APASUS
      I rummaged through everything here! Where does this range come from?


      A man made a reservation .... it happens! ...... request

      Performance characteristics 3M-54E 3M-54E1

      Maximum firing range, km 220 (20 - supersonic section) 300
      Minimum firing range, km 12.5 12.5
      Flight speed, M 0.6-0.8 (up to 3 - in the final section) 0.6-0.8
      Diameter, mm 533 533
      Length, mm 8220 6200
      Wingspan, mm 2200 2200
      Starting weight (with starting engine), kg 1951 1570
      Weight of the starting engine, kg 372 372
      The weight of the warhead, kg 200 450
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 12 June 2012 12: 45
        +2
        Sergey, greetings !! Naryl a little Look at what harsh devices they weigh on him http://www.sukhoi.ru/forum/showthread.php?t=75965
        1. VAF
          VAF 12 June 2012 13: 33
          0
          Quote: Tersky
          Look at how stern devices they weigh him


          Victor, welcome! +! For half an hour I searched for the link patch 75965 .... request
          Found only 75955!
          And there ... well, not at all ....
          Could you clarify or just "hint" what is there ... "broadcast and show" ??? drinks
      2. PLO
        PLO 12 June 2012 13: 05
        +3
        the length of the supersonic section of the zm-54 is like 40 km, which is also relatively small

        A man made a reservation .... it happens !.

        Well, can the flotilla commander be so wrong?
        maybe they included some kind of rocket like x-55 in the uksk?
        1. VAF
          VAF 12 June 2012 13: 35
          +1
          Quote: olp
          Well, can the flotilla commander be so wrong?


          Well ..... we and the leaders of the HIGHEST link quite often give out such "pearls" that just hold on, but here ..... a simple commander and also a flotilla ??? (this is an ironic joke, to complete the picture of the description events and nothing more!), +! drinks
      3. APASUS
        APASUS 12 June 2012 14: 29
        +2
        Quote: veteran.air force
        A man made a reservation .... it happens! ......

        Not a slip of the tongue!
        Where is 375 km and where is 2600 km? These are missiles of different classes. And for the commander of the Caspian Flotilla, Rear Admiral Sergei Alekminsky, it is shameful to make such reservations !!! Tea is not a first year student !!
        1. VAF
          VAF 12 June 2012 14: 35
          +3
          Quote: APASUS
          Not a slip of the tongue!


          All you need to lay out as is ... +! That’s so harmful ... like me ... it’s very nice .... drinks

          So they usually "make a reservation" when .... there is nothing special to say ..... after all, the launch was made for the first time .... and "victorious reports hde ....", that's it .... so let's forgive the person ...it happens! recourse
      4. MURANO
        MURANO 12 June 2012 20: 51
        -1
        Quote: veteran.air force
        Performance characteristics 3M-54E 3M-54E1

        Damn, people! You should at least read what they write here and not only.
        You give the characteristics of EXPORT modifications.
        2600 is not an error, but the flight range of the KR (not the anti-ship missile system) 3M-14. Without "E".
        And 375-range anti-ship missiles 3M-54. Also without "E".
        1. PLO
          PLO 12 June 2012 20: 54
          0
          2600 is not a mistake, but the flight range of the Kyrgyz Republic (and not the RCC) 3M-14.

          can I proof?
        2. VAF
          VAF 12 June 2012 22: 14
          +3
          Quote: MURANO
          Damn, people! You should at least read what they write here and not only.


          Namesake .... do not consider people worse than a steam locomotive !!!! angry

          And it is not necessary to bring Garnet, ZM-10 under the ZM14, even without the "E", by the way, the Grenade D has a flight of 2400 in terms of fuel and in the "SPEC" version (the weight of the warhead is 140 kg, but you know about the fuel yourself)!

          And even more so to consider some people "amateurs" who cannot understand the difference between the concept of "flight range for fuel" and "launch range followed by a flight along the profile of combat use" !!! am



          Now for the ZM-54, which without "E" its flight range for your information is about 1500 km, and all trimming up to 300 km (limiting the flight range) 3M54E is due only to the "Velt politician":

          Therefore, do not fool us little! drinks

          Keep it better ... as a keepsake ... helps calm down ....

          1. saturn.mmm
            saturn.mmm 12 June 2012 23: 15
            +1
            Quote: veteran.air force
            Keep it better ... as a keepsake ... helps calm down ....

            Probably the pilots began to pay more
            1. VAF
              VAF 13 June 2012 10: 14
              +3
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              Probably the pilots began to pay more


              Much ... more, +! And it is very correct! drinks

              But the "hidden" meaning of your comment, I honestly admit ... did not catch it! recourse
              1. saturn.mmm
                saturn.mmm 13 June 2012 13: 03
                +1
                Quote: veteran.air force
                But the "hidden" meaning of your comment, I honestly admit ... did not catch it!

                I meant that along with the high moral and universal qualities of the Russian military, the girls are also attracted by the material aspect.
                Even during the Union, a childhood friend courted a girl; she did not know whom to give preference to until he entered a military school.
                For a long time it was necessary to pay and raise the prestige of the profession, probably Saakashvili played a certain role so that the authorities would notice what was left of the Army there.
          2. MURANO
            MURANO 13 June 2012 19: 39
            +1
            Quote: veteran.air force
            And there is no need to bring under the ZM10 Garnet, ZM-14, even without "E",

            I do not fail. smile I state the fact. 3M-14-rocket is more perfect both in terms of SN and energy.
            Quote: veteran.air force
            and all trimming up to 300 km (limiting the flight range) of the 3M54E is due only to the "Velt Policy":

            So what is the argument? smile I wrote this. Export versions have a significantly shorter flight range. And I did not see schematics. wink
            Quote: veteran.air force
            Keep it better ... as a keepsake ... helps calm down ..

            Thank you, but I'm not worried about nothing. smile My legs are better next to me, but TU-yes ... drinks
            1. VAF
              VAF 13 June 2012 20: 23
              +2
              Quote: MURANO
              Thank you, but I'm not worried about nothing.


              Well, okay ... we got through ..... +! drinks


              Quote: MURANO
              My legs are better next to me, but TU-yes ...


              Well, here .... generally RESPECT ..... I immediately understood what it was about .... good and many, .., unfortunately ..... did not appreciate ..... military humor ... recourse
    3. PLO
      PLO 12 June 2012 13: 01
      +2
      interesting too

      Onyx can and can hit 375km, but for the ZM-14, 300km is stated everywhere

      not clear at all
      1. VAF
        VAF 12 June 2012 14: 07
        +3
        Quote: olp
        Onyx can and can hit 375km, but for the ZM-14, 300km is stated everywhere


        The same did not meet the number 375 .... +! drinks give 120-300 for onyx ... request

        The Onyx missile system uses the П-800 «3М55» cruise missile. "Onyx" is a medium-range anti-ship missile and is intended to destroy enemy surface ships with active fire and electronic countermeasures.
        The rocket was created at the time in opposition to the American "Harpoons".
        Key Features:
        - 3.1 rocket weight tons;
        - rocket speed 2 / 2.6 M;
        - range of 120-300 kilometers;
        - altitude characteristics from 10 to 14000 meters;
        - inertial control + RLGSN;
        - The weight of the warhead 250 kilogram.
        What gives the use of the rocket:
        - autonomy of application (the concept of "shot and forget");
        - the use of subtle trajectories;
        - high supersonic flight speed;
        - the use of stealth technologies that are hardly noticeable;
        - high noise immunity.



        and the aviation "variant" also has a range ... about 300 km.

        1. PLO
          PLO 12 June 2012 14: 11
          +2
          But in the first photo, doesn’t Mosquito stick out between the gondolas?
          Is it generally used in the aviation version or is it just a mockup?
          1. VAF
            VAF 12 June 2012 14: 39
            +3
            Quote: olp
            But in the first photo, doesn’t Mosquito stick out between the gondolas?


            By chance ... yes .... the sea version ..... theoretically ... used .... were at the exhibition and layouts and real ..... I did not communicate with the sailors2 for a long time, but I know for sure that in They were not in service during the extreme campaign on the Kuza and the Su-33s, since the re-equipment was then done only on one machine, and then "this whole idea" was "successfully reformed", like everything else with us, well, and. ... the plane for the company.
            But there is an option. that will already be on the Su-34-kah .... and then we'll see ... +! drinks
            1. PLO
              PLO 12 June 2012 14: 48
              +1
              clear
              although if there is Onyx, it may not be needed anymore Mosquitoes
              1. VAF
                VAF 12 June 2012 19: 11
                +3
                Quote: olp
                it may not need more Mosquitoes


                Not .... Mosquito ... a good thing ... here its amers are very afraid !!!



                It is impossible to avoid “Mosquito”.
                The enemy will notice the rocket just 3-4 seconds before meeting its own ship.
                Due to the enormous kinetic energy, the Mosquito breaks through the hull of any ship and explodes inside.
                Such a strike is capable of sinking not only a middle class ship, but also a cruiser.
                And 15-17 "Mosquitoes" - a whole ship group.
                According to estimates of a number of domestic and foreign experts, the Mosquito is the best anti-ship missile in the world.
                1. 755962
                  755962 13 June 2012 13: 37
                  0
                  Quote: veteran.air force
                  Mosquito is the best anti-ship missile in the world.

                  On a ship aircraft Su-27K (Su-33) under the fuselage between the nacelles can be placed one missile 3M80. However, the issue of guiding the anti-ship missiles at launch from these carriers has not yet been resolved. http://www.testpilot.ru/russia/raduga/kh/41/moskit.htm
    4. yurasumy
      yurasumy 12 June 2012 15: 30
      -1
      I think a typo. Most likely 260 km.
  4. Tersky
    Tersky 12 June 2012 11: 31
    +3
    Oh damn, I'm sorry I left Azov, I would see it with my own eyes. It will be carried out only along the internal route to the Caspian Sea drinks !! It is necessary to build a crab complex with the names of all the Caspian cities !!
    1. VAF
      VAF 12 June 2012 12: 43
      +2
      Quote: Tersky
      It will be carried out only along the internal route to the Caspian Sea


      Victor, +! drinks
      And I so hoped that he was the first of a series of ships that will go to .... "revival" of the Black Sea Fleet ???? recourse
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 12 June 2012 12: 51
        +2
        Quote: veteran.air force
        on .... "revival" of the Black Sea Fleet ????

        Serge, and the turn will reach the Black Sea Fleet! drinks !!
        1. VAF
          VAF 12 June 2012 13: 45
          0
          Quote: Tersky
          and turn to the Black Sea Fleet!


          Vitya, I really hope so, because I think that the Black Sea region is the most dangerous in all respects for us + amers already have a springboard for the operational-tactical deployment and deployment of their forces in the form of the Bolshezny Territory of Rodents!

          And with such a pace ...... "construction" .... can and ... OPA .... BUILD ... completely! crying

          Photos of the current state, i.e. as of June 9, 2012, two corvettes under construction for the Russian Navy at the Amur shipyard in Komsomolsk-on-Amur: 1. Modified project 20380 - "Perfect" (serial number 2101, laid down on June 30, 2006).



          2. "Loud" (serial number 2102, officially laid down on April 20, 2012).

      2. Trailer
        Trailer 12 June 2012 13: 28
        +1
        "It is currently the most powerful ship in service with the Russian Navy." What about the cruiser Moskva? What did the commander-in-chief smoke?
        1. sergey261180
          sergey261180 12 June 2012 13: 37
          +3
          The commander was in the club, smoked onyx there and got a little confused in the caliber. laughing
      3. PLO
        PLO 12 June 2012 14: 03
        +1
        wait for frigates 11357
        Grigorovich for the descent seems to be preparing
        1. VAF
          VAF 12 June 2012 15: 09
          +2
          Quote: olp
          wait for frigates 11357 of Grigorovich for the descent


          URYAYA.Wait, sir ... again, at the expense of the Indians, "we have piled2 three ships for ourselves ..... though they have been sailing for 11 years already, and at the end of the year 3 more are already completely handed over to them, and here ... soon ... to the water ...

          In 2014, the lead frigate of Project 11356 Admiral Grigorovich, which is being built at the Yantar plant in Kaliningrad, will enter the combat strength of the Russian Navy.



          And these are the Indians ... as early as 11 years in the Indian Ocean ....





          Well, what’s not good news ...... so you look at the 50th year and we’ll get to the destroyers and cruisers, but ...... URAYAYAYAYAYA !!!!!

          In the meantime ... for realities, so to speak ... here is Kuznetsova’s flock .....



          And what is it there .... on the port side ... closer to the stern ...... well, ka ... let's take a bigger one ....



          Well, yes ... this is a submarine ... from ... "outpost" Kuznetsov ... though with a small defirent on the starboard side and the tank ... and ... sank a bit .... or not .. . she is in "protection" ... then floated up ??? wassat

          And you say ".. wait ... they are preparing for the descent" ..... already waited .... look !!!

          Here they are ... realities, and you .. everything is LOSING! request
  5. forma2
    forma2 12 June 2012 11: 33
    +1
    Syria still needs military-political will ...
  6. PAP
    PAP 12 June 2012 11: 43
    +1
    I did not understand something with a range. is it RCC or cruise missiles?
    1. PLO
      PLO 12 June 2012 13: 02
      +2
      all PKR cruise missiles, but not all PKR cruise missiles))
      such a pun
  7. raptorr
    raptorr 12 June 2012 13: 47
    0
    So for whom it will be bullet

    So for whom it will be bullet
    2600km for the inland sea. This is not defense. This is a potential aggressor.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 12 June 2012 16: 34
      0
      Well, this should not stink us.
  8. Alexey Prikazchikov
    Alexey Prikazchikov 12 June 2012 16: 35
    0
    Guys, how many ships of this series should be built? As I understand it, they were built purely for the Caspian
    1. PLO
      PLO 12 June 2012 16: 47
      +1
      The first skr Tatarstan was laid down in the 1st year, put into operation in 91, carries the Uran Ukr

      The 2nd skr Dagestan was laid in the 90th year, it is now completed according to the modernized project with Caliber

      there is a third one, but they do not plan to finish it

      do not plan to lay anymore
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        Alexey Prikazchikov 12 June 2012 20: 30
        0
        And why would 3 come in handy in the Caspian. And thanks for the info.
        1. PLO
          PLO 12 June 2012 20: 44
          0
          Well, who knows, maybe they will finish building

          in the meantime, for the Caspian flotilla and the Black Sea fleet, a large series (~ 10 pieces) of project 21631 Buyan-M

          with a smaller displacement of 949t (for project 11661 1500t) it carries the same strike missile armament, more powerful artillery and "inferior" only in anti-aircraft, but for this theater of operations this is not essential

          ps although I believe that instead of a duet and bending aft, it would be better to put 1 Cortic-M / Carapace-M
          1. Alexey Prikazchikov
            Alexey Prikazchikov 13 June 2012 01: 17
            +1
            By the way, they are made on the same platform with a poppy like Astrakhan.
            1. Alexey Prikazchikov
              Alexey Prikazchikov 13 June 2012 01: 25
              +1
              Here from this project.