Peskov commented on the Japanese publications on the "guarantees for the two islands"

122
Press Secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov commented on the publication in the Japanese press about Tokyo’s desire to receive guarantees from Russia on the “transfer of Shikotan and Habomai” as part of the signing of a peace treaty. The head of the Kremlin press service said that Tokyo did not offer the Russian authorities to transfer the said islands "in the context of the discussion of a peace treaty."

Peskov commented on the Japanese publications on the "guarantees for the two islands"




According to Peskov, any reasoning on this subject is inquiring positions, wishes, reasoning, or "thinking out loud."

Sands:
No more.


After that, the journalists asked the press secretary of the president how Vladimir Putin would react if such a “proposal” from the Japanese prime minister is received. Peskov called such reasoning “eventual” (possible under certain circumstances) and added that they are hardly relevant in this situation.

A few days ago, Peskov said that the signing of a peace treaty could be carried out solely on the basis of taking into account the interests of the Russians. A separate question is who exactly today defines the interests of ordinary Russians in our country?

Meanwhile, in Japan, as shown by the data of sociological polls, the majority of respondents are in favor of “getting” four islands of the South Kuriles. On the two islands "do not agree." The Japanese version of the "separation of the skin of an unkilled bear."
  • Facebook
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

122 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    21 January 2019 14: 37
    Some kind of there they have "their own" island life flowed, let Shoigu place something else, but a couple of times with something smile smells.
    1. +48
      21 January 2019 14: 58
      Quote: Rusland
      Some kind of there they have "their own" island life flowed, let Shoigu place something else, but a couple of times with something smile smells.

      It’s not bad that Japan has its own point of view on the results of World War II, but that Russian government officials from the highest echelons of power still cannot clearly speak out about Japanese claims.
      Russia does not negotiate about the "return" of a part of Karelia to Finland, Lithuania or Germany of the Kaliningrad region or Latvia of the Pytalovsky district of the Pskov region, and all attempts to this effect are suppressed with one expression - "From a dead donkey, ears." But with regard to the southern part of the Kuril Islands, the position is completely different and this is alarming. I don't know why Russia needs a peace treaty with Japan and a discussion of the issue of transferring the Kuril Islands to Japan - none of the officials of the highest echelon of power has yet bothered to explain to the population of the country the purpose of communication between Russia and Japan on this issue - but there is a steady opinion that we (the citizens of Russia ) they do not agree on something and this lack of agreement will come to us sideways.
      Even without being a resident of the Kuril Islands, I feel uncomfortable with the fact that the topic of transferring a part of the Kuril Islands to Japan is almost daily "sucked" in the domestic media, and it seems that Russian citizens are being prepared for the surrender of these islands to Japan.
      1. +1
        21 January 2019 15: 35
        But only with Japan there is no peace treaty.
        1. +10
          21 January 2019 15: 47
          Quote: igorbrsv
          But only with Japan there is no peace treaty.

          Are you sure? And what follows from this? Is such a treaty protection, for example, from the sanctions that Japan has imposed on Russia for other reasons?
          1. -2
            21 January 2019 16: 13
            Is there really? Why do I need it, I don’t know. But apparently for this reason such conversations are not conducted with other countries. Who needs it more - we or the Japanese, don’t know either. But lately, at least two territorial disputes have been settled. Whether such a decision is justified - I also have no answer, except for assumptions. But if I express them, then such battles will begin that the author will have only a dozen more articles to wash away. And so the official position of the authorities is declared and everything else can only be speculation.
            Here, for example, yesterday we found a head in a tunnel. Ask Whose? Fish wassat
            1. +2
              22 January 2019 23: 04
              Quote: igorbrsv
              But if I express them, then such battles will begin that the author will have only a dozen more articles to wash away.

              I believe that all the questions about the transfer of the Kuril Islands will be removed by the speech of the President of the Russian Federation - Vladimir Putin, where he, like a Russian man, will declare approximately the following: “The Kuril Islands have been and remain the lands of the Russian Federation! was not! Once and for all! "
              Signature, V.V. Putin
              That's all, the question will be removed from the agenda, and even the year.
              Why doesn’t this happen? Who is dearer to him, the Russian People or Abe?
        2. +1
          21 January 2019 17: 02
          So what? Germany and I do not have a peace treaty either. Do you suffer
        3. +2
          21 January 2019 17: 11
          Quote: igorbrsv
          But only with Japan there is no peace treaty.

          There is no peace treaty with Germany either, so what?
        4. +4
          21 January 2019 17: 18
          Quote: igorbrsv
          But only with Japan there is no peace treaty.


          There is no peace treaty with Germany either. With many countries that participated in the attack with Germany on the USSR in 41, there is also no peace treaty. So what?
          1. 0
            23 January 2019 07: 16
            I read. I’ll refresh my memory. But as far as I remember, Germany signed the surrender to all the participating countries, and Japan surrendered only to the United States, and the nuclear bombing seemed to be caused by the preparation of Japan's surrender to the USSR. The United States could not allow this.
      2. +1
        21 January 2019 15: 45
        Quote: credo
        and the fact that Russian government officials from the highest echelons of power still cannot clearly speak out about Japanese claims.

        they were expressed back in 1956 and since then only confirm
        1. +9
          21 January 2019 16: 26
          Actually, the Japanese are still in the 1951 San Francisco Treaty officially and unconditionally abandoned their claims to southern Sakhalin and all the entire Kuril Islands. How much trouble will this continue?
          1. +3
            21 January 2019 16: 29
            Quote: Herrr
            Actually, the Japanese are still in the 1951 San Francisco Treaty officially and unconditionally abandoned their claims to southern Sakhalin and all the entire Kuril Islands. How much trouble will this continue?

            with every new premier
            1. +1
              21 January 2019 17: 07
              Clear. Clowning forever ...
          2. 0
            23 January 2019 07: 52
            The Japanese recognized the loss of sovereignty over the territories in accordance with the 1951 treaty, but there was a resolution there that allowed not to recognize the rights and claims of the USSR to southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. Therefore, the USSR regarded this treaty as a separate peace and refused to sign it, as did Poland and Czechoslovakia.
            1. 0
              23 January 2019 08: 15
              Right And so it was. But the fact that under the 1951 agreement there is no signature of the representative of the USSR does not return Japan's rights to these territories.
      3. +1
        21 January 2019 17: 10
        Quote: credo
        Russian government officials from the highest echelons of power still cannot clearly speak out about Japanese claims.

        Return to the ground. Lavrov made it clear that there were no islands. A peace treaty, only on the basis of the results of the Second World War, which are clearly negotiated and recognized by everyone (including Japan). Or, in your opinion, the Russian Foreign Minister is not "a state official from the highest echelons of power"?
        1. +1
          21 January 2019 18: 41
          Peskov commented on the Japanese publications on the "guarantees for the two islands"
          and what, maybe Navka is also investing something there ... Yes
        2. Alf
          0
          21 January 2019 22: 26
          Quote: orionvitt
          Or, in your opinion, the Russian Foreign Minister is not "a state official from the highest echelons of power"?

          Is an. That's just something for those in power opinions vary like a weather vane. It is enough to recall how often the opinions of the sun-faced on the participation of our athletes in the Olympics changed.
      4. 0
        22 January 2019 09: 08
        Our officials can be understood, an unsuccessful statement contrary to the opinion of GDP will be the last day of work, so they chew gum, who are willing to lose their bread job. And where did you see the employee of PSU, as our GDP, which would openly articulate its point of view at the international level. For example, sometimes it infuriates me, but alas, he is the president, and not me. Therefore, we have to adapt to his way of working.
  2. +24
    21 January 2019 14: 37
    Peskov called such reasoning "eventual"
    I wonder how it’s just different blizzard from snowstorm eventual?
    1. +8
      21 January 2019 15: 00
      Well, at least I spoke more or less definitely on this topic, although it again suffered in eventuality wassat Why this disgrace is not driven with shame, can also be explained, this is a variant of Psaki, i.e. better confused is he who is confused wassat So he bleats that he himself does not understand what wassat Better said Putin, they say carries a blizzard. This is a kind of mockery of partners, because Putin himself weaves conspiracies inside the conspiracies, and Peskov, of course, himself in a mess, but others cannot understand anything, Abe will soon go crazy wassat
      1. +4
        21 January 2019 15: 06
        Quote: hrych
        Abe will be crazy soon

        I absolutely will not feel sorry for him. laughing
        1. +3
          21 January 2019 15: 19
          If you look at eventuality, a synonym for Peskov himself wassat
      2. +2
        21 January 2019 23: 12
        Quote: hrych
        This is a kind of mockery of partners, because Putin himself is plotting conspiracies,

        Yes, Putin doesn’t weave anything. Sanctions are not going to stop, the rating is falling. Here Putin is rushing about, trying to eat a fish and not to choke on a bone. All this fuss with the Kuril Islands is not just. At a minimum - a factor that distracts from a bunch of problems within the country; at most - I wanted to give, but have not decided yet. He weaves conspiracies ... One multi-way is better than another ... The Great Solved. Soon we will be with knives with Belarus ...
        1. +1
          22 January 2019 00: 55
          Yes, yes, it does not weave. And the Crimea and the Caucasus, and the Syrian shelf, fell by itself. And also the Sea of ​​Okhotsk has become the internal water area of ​​the Russian Federation and the floor of the Arctic has been declared our shelf. And the achievements of the military industry mean nothing to you, neither combat lasers, nor hypersonic gliders, nor Doomsday torpedoes. Or isn’t it? If you do not have enough imagination to assess the situation, why bother to comment?
          1. +3
            22 January 2019 13: 07
            Quote: hrych
            And the Crimea and the Caucasus, and the Syrian shelf, fell by itself.

            About Crimea, there is an opinion that "they took Crimea, but lost Ukraine." What do you mean about the Caucasus? Reconciliation after the second Chechen war? How do you like the recent news about the forgiveness of debts for gas to residents of Chechnya? Themselves, I suppose, have already paid on the meter as expected? Syrian shelf. Therefore, with it we will cover the costs incurred due to the forgiveness of the Chechens 9 billion. Although when the development of the Syrian shelf begins, God knows.
            Quote: hrych
            The Sea of ​​Okhotsk has become the internal water area of ​​the Russian Federation and the floor of the Arctic has been declared our shelf. And the achievements of the military industry mean nothing to you, neither combat lasers, nor hypersonic gliders, nor Doomsday torpedoes. Or isn’t it?

            Again your fairy tale about the white bull. Has the sea become inland? How will this affect the standard of living of Russians? My answer is: no way. We already have a huge territory, but there is no order in it. The Arctic - there too. Apparently we will not get off the hydrocarbon needle in the coming decades. This means that the technological and manufacturing industries will not develop. You have to invest in them, then wait for years when they will give you a profit, and then - again! I got bored, stuck to my mother earth, threw a couple more "strings" of the pipeline to "decaying" Europe, and only have time to count the loot. But to count the loot, of course, is not about you and me - the lot of counting money from gas and oil is a "heavy" cross between the Sechins and the Millers.
            Quote: hrych
            And the achievements of the military industry mean nothing to you, neither combat lasers, nor hypersonic gliders, nor Doomsday torpedoes.

            And the achievements of the military industry should go hand in hand with achievements in the economy and national politics - and only then can such a state be considered developed and successful. A bias towards the military industry will lead the country to the level of the DPRK, although even the North Koreans seem to have taken up the mind.
            Quote: hrych
            If you do not have enough imagination to assess the situation, why bother to comment?

            I certainly can not compare with your imagination. Ali do not remember our discussion about the imaginary naval battle of the Russian squadron with the American, the source of which was some kind of miserable yellow Lebanese newspaper? Of course, those who are crazy about Putin do not need any facts. They themselves will justify all his actions, and justify all his decisions. The main thing is to have enough imagination.
            1. 0
              22 January 2019 13: 35
              Quote: serpent
              About Crimea, there is an opinion that "they took Crimea, but lost Ukraine."

              Ukraine was lost in 1991, and even Yanukovych was a scoundrel and was not a pro-Russian politician, but they saved him because gave us a gold reserve. Purely bought my life. The Caucasus in the sense of control of the Greater Caucasus Mountain Range, a fortress protecting our belly with walls several kilometers away and the road with a hole in it - the Roki Tunnel. Do you have enough sausages? Are you starving? What do you need? What is dissatisfied with? Do you want to live in the Storage? For the ruler, the main thing is not to be rolled out in expensive cars, but the main thing is that the people are fed up and have a social minimum. You are unhappy that others can afford more. That's all. What doesn’t matter for the state and history. We are in a great confrontation, with the seizure of key lands in the history of mankind, there is a war for world order, for dominance, etc. Boreas are built, Yars are built, hypersonic, laser and other systems are built. All this, so that the citizens of Russia have a prospect, and for this great confrontation, our people do not pay millions of lives, as in 1945, and women and children do not fall hungry exhausted by machine tools and plows. Our general, holds the front and seizes the land, causing damage to the enemy, and citizens pay only a small decrease in living standards relative to Putin's time. Or did they live happily at EBN? Want a comeback of these times? There is no alternative.
              Quote: serpent
              And the achievements of the military industry should go hand in hand with achievements in the economy and national politics - and only then can such a state be considered developed and successful.
              Hello, it means nothing to you that Russia for a thousand years became the first self-sufficient in agriculture and became the first in the export of wheat, although the USSR bought grain for gold and currency in the United States. Is this not an economy? And 3 bridges of Vladivostok, the Kerch bridge, is it for people or oligarchs? Okay, there are problems with the economy. In national politics. 2 million Russians increased at the expense of the Crimea, 4 million on the way with the LDNR, the law was passed. Is this not a national policy? Due to the stability and incentive that there is mothercapital, for example, 1,5-2 million babies are born each year, 90-95% of the statistics show that Russian babies are born. A year more than the whole of Chechnya with giblets and even Chechens give birth to 2-2,5 times more Russians, but there are more of us, they will at least horn, and we will add more of their entire ethnic group a year. Is this not a national policy? The population decline has stopped, and here 6 million are on the way, and it is the Russian-Slavic population. There will be a RF population of over 150 million. So what? Few? What else do you need? There are not enough game parades? What do you want? And of course, once the Russian population in Ukraine is oppressed, it will return to Russia, together with lands, better lands, and Ukraine will die unconditionally. We lost her. The whole world is right soon, humanity will lose Ukraine wassat There it is dear to her, along with filth and invented language and lack of culture.
              1. +2
                22 January 2019 15: 34
                Quote: hrych
                The Caucasus in the sense of control of the Greater Caucasus Mountain Range, a fortress protecting our belly with walls several kilometers away and the road with a hole in it - the Roki Tunnel.

                Do you think in terms of the Russian-Turkish wars of the XNUMXth century? A fortress protecting our belly? Type missiles through this ridge will not fly or terrorists will not climb?
                Quote: hrych
                Do you have enough sausages? Are you starving? What do you need? What is dissatisfied with? Do you want to live in the Storage?

                There are enough sausages. I would like to return GOSTs without fail, otherwise the sausage is not clear what is made of. How to live in France? I want as in normal Russia. Without swindlers in power and with the nationalization of all production sectors.
                Quote: hrych
                For the ruler, the main thing is not to be rolled out in expensive cars, but the main thing is that the people are fed up and have a social minimum.

                What then did Putin order a new limousine for himself? Our people are full. Fortunately already in Moscow a map of garbage dumps was made, you can get enough, so to speak.
                Quote: hrych
                You are unhappy that others can afford more. That's all.

                Really. What about the fact that a Russian pensioner eats up the last piece of bread without salt, while French croissants dunk in coffee. What nonsense! There is no need to strive for the best. Better than the 90s and okay. Did not live richly - nefig start.
                Quote: hrych
                What doesn’t matter for the state and history.

                If you are ready to roll yourself into the foundation of the state, this is your business. But there are people who want to live with dignity here and now. Moreover, Russia has all the possibilities for this. Well, a decent salary, social benefits, legality, a sense of confidence in the future will not interfere in any way, but on the contrary - the country will become stronger from this. And those who are ready to eat the land "for the good of the Fatherland", while officials feed their cats with caviar, should not cause anything but contempt. Do not expect good with such "patriots".
                Quote: hrych
                We are in a great confrontation, with the seizure of key lands in the history of mankind, there is a war for the world order, for the dominance, etc.

                The Great Imaginary Confrontation. Wake up at last. Everyone who sits in the Kremlin and the State Duma in the West, which you "oppose," has dachas, children, money. And maybe at this moment, when you are "fighting" on the couch, some conventional Liza Peskova is buying herself another apartment "in Storage", not even suspecting about the epochal battle of all times and peoples. And rightly so, by the way. This whole circus with "confrontation" was created exclusively for mere mortals. And the "elite" meanwhile live for their own pleasure and do not know grief. Maybe with China, the United States really grates. But not with the RF. Economies are not comparable.
                Quote: hrych
                Boreas are being built, yars are being built, hypersonic, laser and other systems are being built.

                Hospitals are being demolished, schools are being cut down, factories are being "optimized".
                Quote: hrych
                All this, so that the citizens of Russia have a perspective, and for this great confrontation, our people do not pay millions of lives, as in 1945, and women and children do not fall hungry exhausted by machine tools and plows.

                And the price increase, raise the retirement age - what is this for? Also for the future? And why would millions of lives pay? China is actively arming itself without paying millions of lives; the United States also does not sacrifice millions. And only in the Russian Federation do you need to lay bones for this? Are you trying to compare modernity with World War II?
                Quote: hrych
                Our general, holds the front and seizes the land, causing damage to the enemy, and citizens pay only a small decrease in living standards relative to Putin’s time.

                It keeps that losing Ukraine, we lose Belarus. So captures that threatened by the Kuril Islands. Our military leader does not hold any front. He keeps his daughters abroad and keeps the Russian people in bondage to the oligarchs and bureaucratic thieves.
                Quote: hrych
                Or did they live happily at EBN? Want a comeback of these times? There is no alternative.

                Again twenty-five. How is this no alternative? Yes, take at least the Chinese management model and in 10 years you will not recognize the Russian Federation. At least you do not recognize the faces of officials, because old ones ... How many more will these nods exist in the 90s? Under Stalin, they did not refer to WWII, but did the job. Hitler (damned), did not whine about Kaiser Germany, but led (albeit in the wrong way) his own Reich forward (well, as he understood it, the fascist face).
                Quote: hrych
                Hello, it means nothing to you that Russia for a thousand years became the first self-sufficient in agriculture and became the first in the export of wheat, although the USSR bought grain for gold and currency in the United States. Is this not an economy?

                And hello to you. "The growth of agriculture in Russia turned out to be a 30% statistical error"
                (https://www.finanz.ru/novosti/aktsii/rost-selskogo-khozyaystva-v-rossii-okazalsya-na-30percent-statisticheskoy-oshibkoy-1027816616)
                Quote: hrych
                And 3 bridges of Vladivostok, the Kerch bridge, is it for people or oligarchs?

                For those and for these. After all, Rottenberg is both a man and ̶парха̶р̶о̶х̶о̶д̶ oligarch. And how many sawn on those bridges? The estimate of Kerch increased 10 times.
                Quote: hrych
                2 million Russians increased at the expense of the Crimea, 4 million on the way with the LDNR, the law was passed. Is this not a national policy?

                And still the mortality rate is higher. Even with the "average temperature in the hospital", and if we count without the Caucasus, then there are even more depressing statistics. "4 million on the way" ... On which approach? The LDNR issue is frozen indefinitely. The national policy is such that Russians from the former republics have been knocking around for years trying to obtain Russian citizenship, and all sorts of repulsed fighters who cannot bind two words in Russian receive a passport in a solemn atmosphere. The bonus is the seat of the deputy in Krasnogorsk.
                Quote: hrych
                even though Chechens give birth to 2-2,5 times more Russians, but there are more of us

                While more. In Macedonia, too, they probably once thought so. How are things there, you can read on the internet.
                Quote: hrych
                The population decline has stopped, and here 6 million are on the way, and it is the Russian-Slavic population.

                The decline has not stopped, and 6 million "on the way" will only temporarily fill the demographic hole.
                Quote: hrych
                There will be a RF population of over 150 million.

                Putin said at a press conference that there were already 160 million. Something your imagination is not keeping pace with your commander.
                Quote: hrych
                it will return to Russia, along with lands, better lands

                Nothing is impossible, with a sufficiently developed imagination.
                Quote: hrych
                Ukraine will die unconditionally. We lost her. Correctly soon the whole world, humanity, will lose Ukraine. The road along with the filth and invented language and lack of culture will be lost there.

                I wonder how soon such passages will sound about Belarus?
        2. -1
          22 January 2019 06: 02
          how all the crawlers got it already ... everything is bad, everyone betrayed and sold ... how to go for bread with such a worldview? all around are traitors ...
          1. +2
            22 January 2019 13: 14
            I would recommend you to watch the first two channels of Russian television more often for a "rest" from these dastardly vsepalschikov. News, 60 minutes, Time will show and other Solovyovs. I guarantee that all the negative will be removed as if by hand. A charge of hurray-patriotic energy will be provided. Although Solovyov has already been giving up recently. He turned into some kind of jester. I used to be more serious. Well, so it is understandable: for the psyche, almost round-the-clock lies are not in vain.
    2. +1
      21 January 2019 15: 04
      Also, a little annoying, this term and its meaning
    3. 0
      21 January 2019 16: 07
      Quote: nils
      I wonder how it’s just different blizzard from snowstorm eventual?
      Probably a degree :)
  3. +3
    21 January 2019 14: 38
    Spokesperson ... I remember EBN changed them like gloves
    1. +5
      21 January 2019 14: 43
      For hygiene? smile Or maybe they didn’t drink with him.
      1. 0
        21 January 2019 14: 50
        And with orientation, some of them seemed to have something strange ... Or people were chatting in vain ... and something else about falling into the water from some passenger water transport ... it was a long time ago ... and it’s good that EBN has long been out of power.
      2. 0
        21 January 2019 15: 10
        Yes, there was one who did not drink. So he dunked him overboard from a yacht into the water ....
    2. +7
      21 January 2019 14: 49
      At EBN they were all disposable, but this reusable Teflon, does not stick and does not stick.
      1. +1
        21 January 2019 16: 03
        Quote: ALARI
        Teflon, does not stick and does not stick.

        Until scratched with a fork. Yes laughing
  4. +4
    21 January 2019 14: 39
    The talking head comments without a break ... does he ever make a smoke break eventual Stakhanovite?
    1. +4
      21 January 2019 15: 06
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      comments without a break ...

      its' his job!!!
  5. +8
    21 January 2019 14: 40
    I hope that at the next summit, Putin and Abe will finally close this topic. Rather, Putin will send Abe to the bathhouse)
    1. +1
      21 January 2019 14: 47
      Do not promise ...
      Abe will take and invite Putin to a Japanese bath.
    2. +3
      21 January 2019 14: 55
      Quote: Fungus
      I hope that at the next summit, Putin and Abe will finally close this topic. Rather, Putin will send Abe to the bathhouse)

      That rare case when I have nothing against your statement. And I tell everyone openly that I put the Fungus plus. Since hope dies last, I will hope too.

      PS Well, besides just hope, I still went out on a solitary picket against the transfer of the South Kuril Islands yesterday.
      And yesterday, against the transfer of the islands, there was a rally in Moscow. Whoever is interested about the rally, who is at least trying to really do something, you can read from Strelkov. There, at the rally, there were imperial flags and reds, they found a common language in this matter.
  6. +1
    21 January 2019 14: 40
    I can’t hear the three-letter sending of respected Japanese colleagues from Peskov ... Well, Che, honestly earned billions, you can not sweat - after them at least a flood
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 15: 02
      Quote: bogart047
      I can’t hear the three-letter send of respected Japanese colleagues from Peskov.

      Does he have a right?
      Well, che, honestly earned billions

      your awareness is simply amazing.
      and how do you know who earned and how much?
      report to you from the tax?
      and in general, consider other people's money as a sign of bad taste No.
      1. 0
        21 January 2019 15: 39
        if taxpayer money, then this is normal. Can you tell me alternative ways of enrichment for politicians? Do you also have a watch for that price?
        1. +1
          21 January 2019 15: 49
          Quote: bogart047
          if taxpayer money, then this is normal

          You still haven’t answered. Where do you get your salary data?
          Do you also have a watch for that price?

          and it's all? belay
  7. +13
    21 January 2019 14: 41
    Peskov called such reasoning “eventual” (possible under certain circumstances)

    So the question remains open for discussion? The Japanese do not lose hope, and ours did not categorically answer NO.
    1. +1
      21 January 2019 14: 48
      Quote: private person
      Peskov called such reasoning “eventual” (possible under certain circumstances)

      So the question remains open for discussion? The Japanese do not lose hope, and ours did not categorically answer NO.

      It seems to me that "this is zhzhzh for a reason" (C). Prepare us for something. Don’t you?
    2. +4
      21 January 2019 14: 49
      Well, what kind of people are these politicians ... they don’t say no ... they don’t say yes ... sit and scratch your turnip in eventual thoughts.
    3. +14
      21 January 2019 14: 59
      The people have said their word for a long time, only who will listen to it ...
    4. 0
      21 January 2019 17: 41
      Quote: private person
      and ours did not categorically answer NO.

      Are you sure everyone tells you?
      1. +2
        21 January 2019 18: 11
        No, I'm not at all sure of this, I will say even more, I'm not at all sure that they are telling us the truth about the transfer of these islands. Or maybe they are no longer ours? As people didn’t ask with the pension reform, but posed a fact, so here they will give everything.
  8. +2
    21 January 2019 14: 46
    Presidential spokesperson

    Useless and unnecessary position with a smart president.
    1. +3
      21 January 2019 15: 05
      Quote: atos_kin
      Useless and unnecessary position with a smart president.

      Should the GDP drop everything and communicate with journalists for any reason?
      name at least one "smart" president in the world who can do without a press secretary.
      and our Foreign Ministry is stupid?
      1. +1
        21 January 2019 17: 36
        Quote: widower
        Should the GDP drop everything and communicate with journalists for any reason?

        And he does so at press conferences. What is the spokesperson doing? That's right, the pen shows who to talk to. A simple secretary is enough for such work. Again, GDP will be more fun. And the work of the Foreign Ministry can be assessed only by V. Solovyov.
        1. 0
          21 January 2019 17: 47
          Quote: atos_kin
          And he does so at press conferences

          one in a year !!!!
          it’s the PRESS SECRETARY who has to deal with journalists all the time.
          this is his job, communication with the press. it’s from the press secretary that we learn the news
          And the work of the Foreign Ministry can be assessed only by V. Solovyov.

          and Solovyov learns about the work of the Foreign Ministry from Zakharova !!! remove it too ???
          1. 0
            21 January 2019 17: 55
            Quote: widower
            learns from Zakharova !!! remove it too ???

            Why not? Lavrov would not be offended, and the Foreign Ministry would look smarter.
            1. +1
              21 January 2019 18: 23
              Quote: atos_kin
              Why not? Lavrov would not be offended

              clear. the fact that everyone should do their job, you do not understand.
              and the Foreign Ministry would have looked smarter.

              The president is not smart, the Foreign Ministry too?
              Congratulations, you are the smartest in the country.
              just why are you on the couch and not the President. well or not the Minister of Defense?
              1. +1
                21 January 2019 19: 46
                Quote: widower
                Congratulations, you are the smartest in the country.

                Thank you, here's a plus. That's just from smart people in power of the Russian Federation is sold and stolen. Continue to defend criminal power further.
                1. 0
                  21 January 2019 19: 51
                  Quote: atos_kin
                  That's just from smart people in power of the Russian Federation is sold and stolen.

                  what was stolen and sold from you ???
                  Continue to defend criminal power further.

                  from the fact that you barked at her, she did not become criminal.
                  1. +1
                    21 January 2019 21: 11
                    Quote: widower
                    she did not become criminal

                    Here's a note for you
  9. +16
    21 January 2019 14: 47
    Peskov did not hear the thought of the impossibility of tearing part of its territory from Russia. But it sounded about such an opportunity. The opportunity to discuss this.
    I have a question for the competent authorities, is it drawn to extremism? An encroachment on our constitution?
    1. +9
      21 January 2019 14: 53
      Our bodies are not that .. At least once the Constitutional Court besieged the guarantor in his flight of thought ??? No. And then he will keep silent in a rag .. request
      1. 0
        21 January 2019 18: 23
        Quote: Tahtvjd2868
        At least once the Constitutional Court besieged the guarantor in his flight of thought ???

        in which flight, do not tell?
  10. -9
    21 January 2019 14: 56
    do not give and sell more expensive, think of 2 islands of terrible
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 14: 59
      The Japs say they won’t take money from us. Read the news more often
    2. +6
      21 January 2019 15: 10
      Quote: Igoresha
      do not give and sell more expensive, think of 2 islands of terrible

      Today we’ll sell two islands, then the Far East, then Siberia and the Urals ... Are you all right?
      1. -5
        21 January 2019 15: 13
        we’ll sell and like the Japanese - here it’s a profit, Putin turned exactly the same with the taiga and cut an piece of the Norwegian sea into an island in the river (China), again
        1. 0
          21 January 2019 17: 42
          More about the loss of Russian territories and who is to blame - https://x-true.info/78111-rossija-mozhet-tretij-raz-v-istorii-otdat-svoi-zemli.html
  11. +1
    21 January 2019 14: 57
    Do not wash, Japs-wash in the Kuril Islands you still do not have to.
  12. +6
    21 January 2019 14: 58
    a hole to them from Sharapov, not a bagel wassat
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 16: 01
      A hole from Sharapova, more correctly.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  13. +3
    21 January 2019 14: 58
    The people do not believe Putin. A student from St. Petersburg bought a house in Shikotan in the hope of becoming Japanese
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 15: 11
      Quote: Chepa
      A student from St. Petersburg bought housing in Shikotan per


      Probably guess something, the fellow countryman Garant wink
      1. -2
        21 January 2019 15: 18
        Konyano St. Petersburg know better. there real estate prices understood 10 times
        1. 0
          21 January 2019 18: 15
          There are houses on Shikotan and apartments there soared from 1.5 million to 15 million
    2. 0
      21 January 2019 15: 44
      To become Japanese it is enough to work hard 6 days a week with a vacation of 9 days. And eat rice with chopsticks. And there is no steam heating in the house. The pleasure is small. It would be better to buy a house in Chechnya to become a sheikh when the World Caliphate creates some kind of prophet.
      1. +1
        21 January 2019 15: 58
        To become Japanese it is enough to work hard 6 days a week with a vacation of 9 days.
        extremely gloomy picture turns out
    3. +1
      21 January 2019 17: 08
      Z.Y., but a student from St. Petersburg is not Peskov’s son, by chance? Then it’s the seams!
    4. 0
      21 January 2019 18: 29
      Quote: Chepa
      A student from St. Petersburg bought a house in Shikotan in the hope of becoming Japanese

      why not immediately in Japan belay
      The people do not believe Putin.

      well, one loser is not the whole nation
  14. 0
    21 January 2019 15: 00
    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    Abe will take and invite Putin to a Japanese bath.

    And the prophecy will come true - after all, in the Japanese "bath" everyone will soak in one barrel.
    1. 0
      21 January 2019 15: 03
      I would like to see how this happens live.
  15. -10
    21 January 2019 15: 02
    In fact, I want the islands to give away. Many Zaputinsky hamsters pink glasses fall. This country will only benefit, and then the islands can then be returned.
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 15: 23
      I also do not like our power.
      And I don’t really like hamsters, since the childhood of their children.
      And now I do not like neither liberal nor jingoistic individuals.
      But this is not a reason for attacks on the territory of Russia.
    2. +6
      21 January 2019 15: 28
      They will not subside, you will recall how Erdogan was the sponsor of the Isis in Syria, how Poroshenko was not a legitimate authority, and how right now they changed the media! People hawala
      I will not say anything about reforms within the country, otherwise the majority begins a sharp "minus" denial of reality
      1. +6
        21 January 2019 15: 32
        After Erdoganov’s inappropriately, in fact, part of the comrades did lose their points. Although it was a trifle. Pension reforms, VAT - very well these same pink glasses broke. So people the further the less willingly haws what they feed him. And the surrender of territories will now be no worse than the pension reform, or even cooler. A pension, I recall, has already collapsed the rating to a historic low.
        1. 0
          21 January 2019 22: 58
          But explain to me, I'm illiterate, but what is the use of the rating, even though it will be negative tomorrow? That with this they will resign, the conscience will wake up, what are the consequences? Maximum more hype and that's it, "but Vaska listens and eats"
          1. +1
            22 January 2019 06: 42
            Such polls always have only one sense - to determine the mood of society. And so yes, until the people wake up and begin to take power into their own hands, there will be no "sense".
    3. +1
      21 January 2019 15: 45
      But what for then they are needed, radioactive?
    4. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
  16. +1
    21 January 2019 15: 08
    A few days ago, Peskov said that the signing of a peace treaty could be carried out solely on the basis of the interests of the Russians.

    Interestingly, how will the government recognize our interests? Will there be a referendum? wassat
    1. +6
      21 January 2019 15: 25
      And I remembered the referendum of 1991. We then spoke out and informed the authorities that we want the USSR to stay ... I hope we don’t need to remember what the authorities did in Belovezhskaya Pushcha with the result of the referendum?
  17. +1
    21 January 2019 15: 09
    Hello everybody.
    Well, if we take into account all the statements of our leadership (personally, Putin himself and the Foreign Ministry), then what in the "bottom line" we have:
    - Russian sovereignty over the islands and the integrity of borders are not discussed,
    - it will be possible to talk about the transfer of islands only after the signing of a peace treaty,
    - in what form the transfer of islands should be made in the declaration of the 56th year is not indicated.
    I would like to know from knowledgeable people - in what form a part of the territory from one state can be transferred to another without changing the sovereignty of these territories (for example: joint use, rent, etc.)?
    1. 0
      22 January 2019 07: 41
      In the dry residue:
      "it will be possible to talk about the transfer of the islands"
      CAN!!!
      SPEAK!!!
      And this is on behalf of the GUARANTEE !!!
      Do you need such a guarantor? And what can he guarantee to you (your children / grandchildren) ?!
      The guarantor is obliged to clearly and unequivocally declare the impossibility of negotiating the tearing away of Russian territories.
      Such rejection is possible only after a shameful surrender after a shamefully lost war.
      And then only for a while, until victory in a just subsequent war (with the subsequent rejection of both its territories temporarily occupied by the adversary and some of the adjacent ones, interesting in terms of reducing the aggressive potential of the defeated adversary.
      And NO other way ...
      And the declaration of the 56th died in less than 5 years, even under Khrushchev.
      Try to include what you have between your ears and under a winter hat. Turning off the zombie and removing the blinkers.
      Good luck, I believe in you!
      1. 0
        22 January 2019 08: 37
        Good afternoon.
        Firstly, you don’t need to poke - they didn’t drink at the Brudershaft.
        Secondly, the statements I mentioned were made not on behalf of the GUARANTOR, but by the GUARANTOR itself. The issue of transferring the islands can be raised (according to the statements of the president and the Foreign Ministry again) only after the signing of a peace treaty with the recognition by the Japs of the results of the war, which in turn imply Russian sovereignty over the islands.
        Since I am not strong in international territorial law, I therefore asked the knowledgeable people what forms of transfer of territories are possible without transfer of sovereignty over them. Although, as for me personally, I would send nonsamurai far and long in clear text even with the first statements regarding our territories. But it's me, and we have what we have. So I want to understand this problem, to hear a competent opinion. hi
        1. -1
          22 January 2019 08: 54
          Do not poke, so do not poke ...
          We will poke, but differently.
          1. think that the declaration of the 56th year is DEAD, but with it (referring to it) the Russians are treacherously fooled.
          2. Japan RECOGNIZED following the war that she REFUSES from the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin.
          3. That is, the Kuril Islands can belong to anyone, but Japan is in the LAST turn.
          4. Japan has long recognized the outcome of the war. She just did not sign the peace treaty, and the war with her has long been over by everyone, the results are recorded in all international documents. In New York (or somewhere else in the USA) the original of the contract is kept, in which Japan REFUSED from the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin.
          5. Statements on behalf of the GUARANTOR or not on behalf of him - it does not matter if the guarantor has not pulled these persons.
          6. Russia does not need to make any unilateral concessions to the Japanese, even regarding fishing. Only on a mutually beneficial basis.
          7. I would not call my neighbors "Japs", you will decide whether you are for correctness and respect, or only for correctness in relation to you (and exclusively).
          8. Suppose that, based on the results of the war, the Japanese did not recognize sovereignty over all the Kuril Islands for the USSR / RF, but they RECOGNIZED that this sovereignty does not belong to them. This was enough for the USSR. Think for yourself, and then think about the words and position of the guarantor and the others involved in this unsightly affair.
          1. +1
            22 January 2019 09: 08
            My personal opinion about any talk about our territories was expressed above. I have respect for the current population of Japan, and mainly its government does not cause any.
            You are right, the Japanese really abandoned the Kuril Islands and Sakhalin (an agreement like in San Francisco was signed, but the Union refused to sign it).
            I’m just wondering, based on the official statements of our elite, how the transfer of the islands is possible, although I personally emphasize once again that I am categorically against such conversations and biddings in general.
            1. -1
              22 January 2019 09: 39
              Some commentators point out that it is enough for the Russian Federation to send a document to the United States that the Russian Federation joins the San Francisco treaty.
              And after that, Japan will no longer be able to insist on Japanese sovereignty on the Kuril Islands.
              The Union did not refuse to sign that treaty, the USSR refused to participate in that event in the absence of the PRC in the negotiations, as one of the main winners (and the main victim) in the war with Japan.
              1. 0
                22 January 2019 10: 15
                Russia is unlikely to join this treaty, written by the United States in its interests. I read the text of the contract itself - it turns out that Japan refuses Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, which it received under the Portsmouth Treaty. And since the USSR was not the assignee of the Russian Empire, according to the San Francisco Treaty, sovereignty over the islands could not automatically transfer to the USSR, and now to Russia. Therefore, a separate agreement was needed between the USSR and Japan as a result of the war, including officially fixing the borders of the two states.
                1. -1
                  22 January 2019 10: 54
                  It is curious why Russia is not the successor to RI?
                  A separate agreement was not needed, the United States invited the USSR to sign that agreement, but the United States categorically did not want to recognize our ally China.
                  That is why the USSR did not sign that treaty.
                  1. 0
                    22 January 2019 11: 03
                    Well, as far as I know, Russia is the assignee of the USSR, but the USSR, in turn, was not the assignee of the Russian Empire, renouncing all its obligations and, accordingly, rights.
                    China, in modern terms, the United States really threw, and very hard, despite the damage it suffered and the huge loss of life. The union in this case took a 100% right step, not betraying the interests of a neighbor.
  18. +2
    21 January 2019 15: 21
    exclusively based on the interests of Russians

    and when this opinion of citizens was taken into account by Moscow. celestials do not know and do not want to hear and see those who live outside the Moscow Ring Road. All the latest laws were adopted in such a way, and pension reform, and an increase in VAT, etc. They NEVER take into account the opinion of citizens, only their selfish interest
  19. Cry
    +1
    21 January 2019 15: 34
    The only guarantee of the surrendered vassal was, is and will be hara-kiri.
  20. +5
    21 January 2019 15: 35
    judging by the number of different statements in the press and on the Internet, the issue of transferring the islands has already been resolved .. Our authorities simply cannot decide how to present this event to the inhabitants of our country, so as not to spoil our faces at all ..
  21. +3
    21 January 2019 15: 53
    We've gotten all these speculations, rumors, conjectures, etc. "patient delirium". Islands should not be given to the Japanese under any guise, for any money or preferences. And while everyone is against, a completely stupid game with the Japanese continues. And if tomorrow some other country wants to buy a piece of Russian territory, they will also prove that this land is uninhabited, they will find people from the Middle East who will say that these are the original lands of the Republic of Chad, which never belonged to Russia, and ... will they sell? Idiocy! But bringing the situation to the point of absurdity and receiving dividends from this with the Japanese will not work. From you just have to drive.
    1. 0
      21 January 2019 16: 31
      totally agree with you !
  22. +4
    21 January 2019 16: 24
    A few days ago, Peskov said that the signing of a peace treaty could be carried out solely on the basis of the interests of the Russians.
    Oh, how, and I, naive, thought that solely on the basis of the Constitution ...
  23. BAI
    0
    21 January 2019 16: 25
    Peskov said that the signing of a peace treaty can be carried out solely on the basis of accounting interests of Russians. A separate question, who exactly today interests of ordinary Russians in our country determines?

    And what have "ordinary Russians" to do with it? Peskov did not specify which Russians he was talking about.
  24. +4
    21 January 2019 16: 30
    what can there be a conversation with the Japs? even if, purely hypothetically, our government gives back even one wildest island, it will be a betrayal of all our people, our grandfathers and great-grandfathers who were dying for our land, it will be like dumb youngsters urinating in eternal flame on mass graves. I hope for our government that there will be no such actions, and a peace treaty with American puppets is not worth it, it is not worth anything.
  25. +4
    21 January 2019 16: 57
    Quote: Pbs2
    In fact, I want the islands to give away. Many Zaputinsky hamsters pink glasses fall. This country will only benefit, and then the islands can then be returned.

    The last time, when we began to return the Kuril Islands, 12 thousand soldiers and officers of the Red Army were killed (and this was from August 9 to September 8, 1945). But the islands were returned, became part of Soviet Russia, and now there is talk that they should be given to the Japanese. About 25 million killed at the hands of the German fascists "forgot", withdrew troops from Germany. How fools brought it out ... In fact, what is 12 thousand compared to 25 million ..? Is it so?
  26. +3
    21 January 2019 17: 39
    It would be better if the GDP banned this topic altogether and put an end to it, well, they lived without this piece of paper, because Japan is an occupied country, that is, it is not her bridgehead but her master -USA against Russia, Something is wrong on Smolenskaya Square if this blizzard passes 73 years later, and through such distributors of Russian land as Khrushchev. survived in Russia, what kind of a topic to procrastinate. I don’t like the Koreans, they have an alternative to Korea and they have almost all the technologies. Why do we need GDP, and so people offended by retirement age and here still give the island is not good.
  27. +3
    21 January 2019 18: 30
    Something subtilizes our power at the expense of the Kuril Islands .. There is a preparation of public opinion clearly ..
    Just try the bastards to sell the Kuril Islands. negative
  28. 0
    21 January 2019 19: 17
    Delirium out loud ... dreamers, however, these samurai ... But if the dreams do not come true, you just have to sit in a pose and make yourself a seppuka or hara-kiri on a thin stomach.
  29. +1
    21 January 2019 20: 19
    And why did the winners have a peace treaty when the surrender was signed. Or they promised the enemies of the people SUCH that they are ready to jump out of their pants.
  30. Yat
    +1
    22 January 2019 00: 03
    Peskov can speak Russian in general?
  31. 0
    22 January 2019 01: 26
    in Japan, according to opinion polls, the majority of respondents are in favor of “receiving” the four islands of the South Kuril Islands. They do not agree on the two islands.

    give 2 islands and say that the Japanese were deceived
  32. +1
    22 January 2019 05: 03
    - Give us the islands?

    - Then. Half. May be.*
  33. 0
    22 January 2019 06: 37
    Quote: credo
    Quote: Rusland
    Some kind of there they have "their own" island life flowed, let Shoigu place something else, but a couple of times with something smile smells.

    It’s not bad that Japan has its own point of view on the results of World War II, but that Russian government officials from the highest echelons of power still cannot clearly speak out about Japanese claims.
    Russia does not negotiate about the "return" of a part of Karelia to Finland, Lithuania or Germany of the Kaliningrad region or Latvia of the Pytalovsky district of the Pskov region, and all attempts to this effect are suppressed with one expression - "From a dead donkey, ears." But with regard to the southern part of the Kuril Islands, the position is completely different and this is alarming. I don't know why Russia needs a peace treaty with Japan and a discussion of the issue of transferring the Kuril Islands to Japan - none of the officials of the highest echelon of power has yet bothered to explain to the population of the country the purpose of communication between Russia and Japan on this issue - but there is a steady opinion that we (the citizens of Russia ) they do not agree on something and this lack of agreement will come to us sideways.
    Even without being a resident of the Kuril Islands, I feel uncomfortable with the fact that the topic of transferring a part of the Kuril Islands to Japan is almost daily "sucked" in the domestic media, and it seems that Russian citizens are being prepared for the surrender of these islands to Japan.

    More precisely, it is difficult to express what is happening!
  34. 0
    22 January 2019 07: 50
    Why does Japan need the Kuril Islands? When our border guards in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk carry out the “Putin” operation, fish prices in Japan increase 3 times. Japan is one of the few countries in which it is officially permitted to exterminate whales. And here is such an opportunity, because ownership of the islands makes it possible to plunder Russia's natural resources without hindrance. During the Great Patriotic War, the Japanese repeatedly detained our ships, and some of them drowned. It is not clear to me why We do not demand monetary compensation for the actions of their illegal armed gangs. Or maybe a lot of time has passed and we all forgot? I'm not talking about the fact that these islands cannot be transferred. Because the security of our country will be compromised. Our submarines will not be able to leave Vladivostok in the Pacific Ocean.
  35. 0
    22 January 2019 13: 02

    An interesting interview on the topic of the islands.
  36. 0
    23 January 2019 09: 26
    Peskov called such reasoning “eventual” (possible under certain circumstances).
    I remember the cartoon "Golden Antelope". Where the razhda says "Stupid animal, there is never a lot of money."
    Ordinary Russians will not have anything from the sale of the two islands, and they will not be able to retire from them. But for someone on a personal account, the amount may increase. So if you don’t get re-elected, then why not make the Japanese happy?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"