The US Department of Defense is ready to acquire the Israeli air defense system Iron Dome

89
The US Department of Defense confirmed its intention to purchase the Iron Dome (Iron Dome) air defense system from Israel by sending a request to Congress for the purchase of two batteries for the Israeli system. "Warspot" with reference to the portal armyrecognition.com.

The US Department of Defense is ready to acquire the Israeli air defense system Iron Dome




According to the blog, if the transaction is approved, the US Army will receive two Iron Dome air defense batteries for 2020, including 12 launchers, 240 interceptor missiles, as well as a control system and radar stations. In the US, the defense ministry calls this purchase "interim" and report that the final decision on adopting this system into service with the US Army will be made by 2023. At the same time, unofficially reported that attempts to create their own American air defense system based on the AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles were unsuccessful.

The development of the Iron Dome air defense system was launched in 2006 year. The United States closely watched the creation of the complex, and in 2011, Israel was given 1,4 billion dollars to develop the system. In the future, Rafael joined forces with Raytheon to produce a system with an 50% content of components manufactured in the USA in exchange for financing. The presence of half of US parts in the production of the system is a requirement of the US Department of Defense.

The Iron Dome system is designed to intercept unguided tactical missiles at a distance from 4 to 70 km. Developed by the Israeli company Rafael. One battery can protect an area of ​​150 square kilometers. In the West, the Iron Dome is called one of the most reliable systems in its class.
  • armyrecognition.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    19 January 2019 17: 28
    Great choice. From pipes it seems protects flying
    1. -12
      19 January 2019 17: 41
      Jews stole almost the entire basis from the USSR air defense.
      This is what happens when you trust the development of key systems to "foreigners".
      1. -4
        19 January 2019 18: 25
        Quote: lucul
        Jews stole almost the entire basis from the USSR air defense.
        This is what happens when you trust the development of key systems to "foreigners".

        or maybe just what was stolen - from that and did, well, as they could of course, but stole the old mine rocket protection system
    2. +8
      19 January 2019 17: 46
      Quote: Meckajiuhe
      Great choice. From pipes it seems protects flying

      For the sake of interest, you would read about the Hamas missile arsenal with which the LCD has to deal. After all, there are a lot of materials on the Internet. Perhaps you are interested in this if you leave comments in the subject.
      1. -2
        19 January 2019 17: 49
        I have no close acquaintances in Hamas. And the fact that they shoot with rusty pipes and ancient iron is obvious. And non-obvious beneficiaries of shooting at empty "chicken coops"
        1. +4
          19 January 2019 17: 54
          The US Department of Defense is ready to acquire the Israeli air defense system Iron Dome

          If we take into account the annual US assistance to Israel in the amount of about 4 billion, then why not buy something from ourselves? smile
          1. -1
            19 January 2019 18: 29
            Quote: SRC P-15
            The US Department of Defense is ready to acquire the Israeli air defense system Iron Dome

            If we take into account the annual US assistance to Israel in the amount of about 4 billion, then why not buy something from ourselves? smile

            both help and purchase once again confirm the Americans' handshaking in this direction
          2. +1
            19 January 2019 18: 46
            The question is different. Why are they Americans? If only to defend their base on the same BV? Well then, it’s clear. And then I already thought that Trump LCD decided to place on the border with Mexico.
            But then what, are preparing for an exchange of blows with Iran?
            1. +2
              19 January 2019 18: 53
              Quote: PalBor

              The question is different. Why are they Americans?

              I think only to support the "military" of Israel. They hope that looking at them, other countries will rush to buy these complexes. As the saying goes: "advertising is the engine of commerce!" And in a simple way: they want the money they have invested to bring big profits.
        2. +6
          19 January 2019 17: 59
          Quote: Meckajiuhe
          I have no close acquaintances in Hamas. And the fact that they shoot with rusty pipes and ancient iron is obvious. And non-obvious beneficiaries of shooting at empty "chicken coops"

          Do not you think that you wrote a frank nonsense?
          1. -11
            19 January 2019 18: 03
            What is the picture for? If I have a member, I absolutely do not have to rape someone .. Just don’t tell me that from morning till night you will be beaten by all of the above.
        3. +2
          19 January 2019 18: 00
          Quote: Meckajiuhe
          I have no close acquaintances in Hamas. And the fact that they shoot with rusty pipes and ancient iron is obvious. And non-obvious beneficiaries of shooting at empty "chicken coops"

          I wonder by what signs is this obvious to you? )))
          All the Fajras that Hamas used to fire at Tel Aviv in 2014 are quite normal missiles of industrial, Iranian mass production.
          1. -6
            19 January 2019 18: 04
            I work with Iran. Therefore, I understand perfectly everything that they can do.
            1. -8
              19 January 2019 18: 07
              They flew to Tel Aviv - I’m a witness myself, so they’ll fulfill their tasks)). In addition to the Syrian-Iranian crafts, the arms of Hamas were Russian and Chinese Grads hi
        4. +1
          20 January 2019 11: 45
          Quote: Meckajiuhe

          I have no close acquaintances in Hamas. And the fact that they shoot with rusty pipes and ancient iron is obvious. And non-obvious beneficiaries of shooting at empty "chicken coops"

          Well, if you think so, then it is obvious that you have not graduated from school. After all, your reasoning is so naive and helpless that a person who graduated from school probably would not have allowed them. Of course, if you follow your logic.
          In reality, it would be possible to look for sources, read which school you graduated from in social networks, congratulate you and your school on this and not make hasty and stupid judgments. But we have your logic? Therefore, yes, Hamas shoots only rusty pipes, and you definitely did not finish school. Pichalka.
          1. 0
            20 January 2019 14: 04
            Quote: Pimply
            But we have your logic? So yes, Hamas only shoots rusty pipes,

            and what did you want to say? What mosad profukal supplies of missiles in Gaza?
            1. +2
              20 January 2019 14: 07
              Quote: poquello
              and what did you want to say? What mosad profukal supplies of missiles in Gaza?

              Do you see something shameful about this? Deliveries there go a constant stream, not to intercept all. Large deliveries were intercepted more than once or twice, but this does not mean that everything is being intercepted. If you believe that you can intercept everything that can stop any terrorist act - then forgive us, are we in kindergarten?
              1. 0
                20 January 2019 14: 19
                Quote: Pimply
                Quote: poquello
                and what did you want to say? What mosad profukal supplies of missiles in Gaza?

                Do you see something shameful about this? Deliveries there go a constant stream, not to intercept all. Large deliveries were intercepted more than once or twice, but this does not mean that everything is being intercepted. If you believe that you can intercept everything that can stop any terrorist act - then forgive us, are we in kindergarten?

                Well, do you say the missiles are serious, and if they are brought in and shot, what kind of kindergarten is this?
      2. +3
        19 January 2019 17: 53
        It is interesting who will attack the mattress from their closest neighbors or for them all are already enemies around! ????
        1. +2
          19 January 2019 18: 02
          Quote: Egorovich
          It is interesting who will attack the mattress from their closest neighbors or for them all are already enemies around! ????

          They are full of troops in areas where shelling by the NURSs occurs regularly.
        2. +1
          19 January 2019 21: 56
          Yegorych, the Chinese will buy Mexico, then we'll see.
      3. 0
        19 January 2019 18: 45
        I absolutely do not understand why the United States needs such a system? Mexico or Canada wants to fire the United States?
        1. +2
          20 January 2019 11: 45
          Quote: dr.star75

          I absolutely do not understand why the United States needs such a system? Mexico or Canada wants to fire the United States?

          First of all - the protection of foreign bases.
      4. 0
        19 January 2019 19: 15
        Aaron Zawi (Aaron) hi
        For the sake of interest, you would read about the Hamas missile arsenal with which the LCD has to deal. After all, there are a lot of materials on the Internet. Perhaps you are interested in this if you leave comments in the subject.
        Here, few people are interested in the obvious. The incredible excites more. What kind of business is this for the Americans? I'm talking about the Iron Dome. Cover the missile defense system in Europe. As a dead poultice. These stationary sheds will put our people in whatever they want. Moreover, no one and never a simple warhead to shoot such objects will not. Only nuclear. So they will cover their bases in the Middle East and Afghanistan. Well, this dome was made for such a thing. In general, nothing surprising. Well, agree not to buy the Pantsir for the Americans.
        1. +1
          19 January 2019 22: 09
          Quote: Observer2014
          Well, agree not to buy the Americans "Pantsir"

          ========
          Why not??? Although - WE WILL NOT SELL !!! Let the "iron domes" get by !!!
          1. -1
            19 January 2019 22: 12
            venik (Vladimir)
            Why not??? Although - WE WILL NOT SELL !!! Let the "iron domes" get by !!!
            Yes
      5. +3
        19 January 2019 20: 32
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Hamas missile arsenal

        Khybar is the most advanced NM for you, it doesn’t pose a threat, but Kassam’s most massive pipe is successfully knocked down by the LCD, but Hezbollah and the Iranian Farj family missiles, which are being upgraded by head it is in the future a headache not only for you ... but for us from the South, no one has the OTRK yet, we will successfully repel Iranian infantry ballistic missiles, but the numerous OTRKs with a radius of up to 500 will only be a preventive strike ... today, the Americans will leave the INF us in this theater of operations against Iran, Turkey, Pakistan and others will become much freer in terms of deploying retaliatory funds and choosing a strike in strategic planning.
        1. 0
          19 January 2019 22: 02
          Fajras hit Tel Aviv
          All were shot down
        2. mvg
          +1
          20 January 2019 02: 16
          in this theater of war against Iran, Turkey, Pakistan and others

          This direction is the safest .. only if in Turkey they again deploy nuclear weapons on the BRDS .. We are not in bad relations with Iran and Pakistan. They and we have other headaches.
        3. +3
          20 January 2019 11: 50
          Quote: Ascetic
          Khaybar is the most advanced for you.

          Well, actually, no. Hamas has a large enough set there. In the picture a list of what and when used.

  2. -2
    19 January 2019 17: 33
    And not ashamed of striped, maybe we, too, from China, ship hulls to start buying, since they themselves are so long and expensive))
    1. +6
      19 January 2019 17: 51
      Quote: MY THOUGHT
      And not ashamed of striped, maybe we, too, from China, ship hulls to start buying, since they themselves are so long and expensive))

      They buy "Karl Gustav" from the Swedes. And a lot around the world. However, although they proceed from the fact that inventing a wheel is more expensive for themselves, they always give a chance to their firms.
    2. +5
      19 January 2019 18: 26
      Quote: MY THOUGHT
      And not ashamed of striped, maybe we, too, from China, ship hulls to start buying, since they themselves are so long and expensive))

      They have no inferiority complex.
      1. +2
        19 January 2019 18: 47
        Quote: professor
        They dont have

        Do they need it? From whom is the United States going to fight back with such systems? belay
        1. +5
          19 January 2019 18: 48
          Quote: dr.star75
          Quote: professor
          They dont have

          Do they need it? From whom is the United States going to fight back with such systems? belay

          From your friends Hezbalonov and co.
          1. -1
            19 January 2019 18: 59
            Quote: professor
            From your friends Hezbalonov and co.

            Why such a gavarish? Nada tolerance belongs to the appan.
            "England has neither friends nor enemies, England has only its own strategic interests"
            But in essence: Are you saying that in Canada and Mexico there are "Hazbalons and Co" who are ready to shell the United States? belay Is it possible in more detail?
            1. +1
              19 January 2019 19: 00
              Quote: dr.star75
              But in essence: Are you saying that in Canada and Mexico there are "Hazbalons and Co" who are ready to shell the United States? Is it possible in more detail?

              1. 0
                19 January 2019 19: 04
                It is very good that you have posted this map. it very clearly shows "countries with US military bases", and further down the list!
          2. +1
            19 January 2019 22: 14
            Quote: professor
            From your friends Hezbalonov and co.

            =======
            Well, in general, it is "YOUR" Friends "" - and their impudent policy "spawned" !!! And now - "complain" .... "Flag in hand, drum - on the neck, and" tailwind "in the stern" !!! "
    3. mvg
      +2
      20 January 2019 02: 20
      ship hulls

      With the buildings it’s normal. Our filling suffers. Wherever you spit, there’s a problem everywhere. And BIOS and weapons and engines. We have both the SAC and artillery and missiles and air defense, everything has its own problems .. And we quickly cut the ass to the Mistrals.
  3. +2
    19 January 2019 17: 33
    Perhaps they buy because the Israeli come out cheaper than their own with the same characteristics. In addition, the system is already in service and tested.
    1. -3
      19 January 2019 18: 01
      Quote: alma
      Perhaps they buy because the Israeli come out cheaper than their own with the same characteristics. In addition, the system is already in service and tested.

      Checked then checked, but the results of the "check" were not very comforting, since the effectiveness of the fight against artisanal "Kassams" is only 25%. In addition, this contraption is a bit expensive - 40 thousand Bakinsky for one interceptor that took off. Considering that the Palestinians fired about 460 missiles at the last time in Israel, then this "iron dome" gobbled up about 20 million dollars in a couple of days. Not only is he gluttonous, but he is also slow-witted, since it takes 15 seconds from detecting and recognizing a target to launching an interceptor missile, which is a lot, since Qassam flies faster. The Jews, of course, tried to justify this failure by the fact that this dome is so smart that it lets through non-dangerous missiles and knocks down only dangerous ones, but the Saudis who were going to buy this system from them seriously strained - is it worth it? Now they are grinding the topic of purchasing the S-400.
      1. +2
        19 January 2019 18: 12
        C-400 and LCD have completely different purposes. It is more correct to compare the Russian air defense system with the Israeli HEC or the David Sling, probably)). As for efficiency - in 2014, out of hundreds of missiles launched in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan, not a single one fell on the cities - they went astray. hi
        1. 0
          19 January 2019 18: 32
          Quote: Krasnodar
          It is more correct to compare the Russian air defense system with the Israeli HEC or the David Sling, probably))

          This comparison will also be incorrect, since on July 23, 2018, near the Golan Heights, the Sling of David was unable to intercept two Syrian OTR-21 Tochka, which are 40 years old. hi In principle, there is not a single system that gives a 100% guarantee of interception, but we must strive for this, so we still have to work and work with the "Iron Dome" so that it corresponds to how they try to promote it.
          1. 0
            19 January 2019 18: 36
            There, in my opinion, they did not intercept a point, but air defense missiles of the Syrians, who flew towards Israel. Now the system is being finalized, as the interception results were fig (during the first combat use a couple of years ago, the result was good).
        2. +2
          19 January 2019 18: 51
          Quote: Krasnodar
          C-400 and LCD have completely different purposes. It is more correct to compare the Russian air defense system with the Israeli HEC or the David Sling, probably)). As for efficiency - in 2014, out of hundreds of missiles launched in Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan, not a single one fell on the cities - they went astray. hi





          1. +2
            19 January 2019 18: 59
            My office then was just on Daphne Street - opposite Matkal)) If, on the first one, I went out onto the stairs with an alarm, then vice versa - I looked out the window. I saw interceptions somewhere above Givatayim (or the border of Tel Aviv-Givatayim)
      2. 0
        19 January 2019 18: 21
        Let them take S-300B4. If you need a system mainly against missiles
      3. +7
        19 January 2019 18: 35
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Checked then checked, but the results of the "check" were not very comforting, since the effectiveness of the fight against artisanal "Kassams" is only 25%.

        Did you come up with this figure? MO published figures on overall performance in 85%.


        Quote: Nyrobsky
        In addition, this thing is a little expensive - 40 thousand bakinsky for one interceptor that flies out.

        1. Less.
        2. The bullet costs cents, and the bulletproof vest is $ 2000. Do you propose to throw away the armor or not protect the power plant in Ashdod from Fylystyn missiles?

        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Not only is he gluttonous, but he is also slow-witted, since it takes 15 seconds from detecting and recognizing a target to launching an interceptor missile, which is a lot since Kassam is flying faster.

        Seriously? How then does he manage to intercept mortar shells? Fylystyntsy send your request for shelling to us. fool

        Quote: Nyrobsky
        The Jews, of course, tried to justify this failure by the fact that this dome is so smart that it misses non-hazardous missiles and shoots down only dangerous ones, but the Saudis who were going to buy this system from them seriously strained - is it worth it?

        1. Started to make excuses at the level of technical specifications?
        6 September 2011
        https://topwar.ru/6584-zheleznyy-kupol-znaniya-a-glavnoe-opyt.html
        2. Israel decided to sell weapons to the Saudis? Circus. wassat

        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Now they fray the topic for the acquisition of C-400.

        Yeah. LCD with targets 4-70 km and C-400 analogues. Sit down, two.
      4. +5
        19 January 2019 18: 47
        The system works on shells and missiles that fly into the areas of development and its efficiency is very high. Americans do not take a good frara system tested in combat conditions
      5. 0
        20 January 2019 11: 53
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Checked then checked, but the results of the "check" were not very comforting, since the effectiveness of the fight against artisanal "Kassams" is only 25%. In addition, this contraption is a bit expensive - 40 thousand Bakinsky for one interceptor that took off.


        Remedies always cost more than a means of attack. A bulletproof vest is worth more than a mower of bucks, and a bullet is a dollar. But you do not offer to abandon body armor, right?

        There is no absolute means of protection. However, those that are at the moment (LCD, for example) are satisfied with Israel. Naturally, they are not completely satisfied - therefore, the modernization of such systems and the development of new ones continue. This is a normal process, the misunderstanding of which is nonsense.
        1. 0
          20 January 2019 20: 56
          Quote: Pimply
          There are no absolute remedies. However, those that are at the moment (LCD, for example) are satisfied with Israel. Naturally, they are not completely satisfied - therefore, the modernization of such systems and the development of new ones continue.

          I wrote about the same
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          In principle, there is not a single system that gives a 100% guarantee of interception, but we must strive for this, so we still have to work and work with the "Iron Dome" so that it corresponds to how they try to promote it.

          Quote: Pimply
          This is a normal process, the lack of understanding of which is stupid.

          It is foolish to say that a system is perfect if there are some obvious flaws. hi
  4. 0
    19 January 2019 17: 44
    no one is buying .. we decided to promote PR through the purchase of the US Ministry of Defense ..) its effectiveness was visible during the Hesbola attack. They stupidly pressed on the iron cumpole.
    1. +4
      19 January 2019 18: 01
      Quote: SS-18 Satan
      no one is buying .. we decided to promote PR through the purchase of the US Ministry of Defense ..) its effectiveness was visible during the Hesbola attack. They stupidly pressed on the iron cumpole.

      Someone confuses Hamas and Hezbollah. laughing
  5. +2
    19 January 2019 17: 44
    The battle system, proven. Already a plus. Americans with new developments are becoming more expensive and with mixed results. So they are buying.
  6. +1
    19 January 2019 17: 48
    The Americans think for the future on how the Iron Beam laser complex is created as an addition to the Iron Dome system!
  7. +3
    19 January 2019 17: 54
    Thank you for the very good news! The list of operators of this beautiful system has replenished with another country. smile

    And, after all, it was not long ago ...
    "In the near future, Azerbaijan may receive new anti-missile defense systems. Yesterday, on December 18, the apa.az portal reported that the Defense Ministries of Azerbaijan and Israel agreed on the purchase of the Iron Dome missile defense system (" Iron Dome ").
    According to the Minister of Defense Industry of Azerbaijan, Yaver Jamalov, his department "gave a positive response to the purchase of the Iron Dome system produced by the Israeli company Rafael." The details of the contract will be announced after signing it. "Source: https://warspot.ru/7863-azerbaydzhan-prikroetsya-zheleznym-kupolom
    1. -1
      19 January 2019 18: 23
      Against Iskander will not help
      1. +1
        19 January 2019 18: 32
        Against the Iskanders there is the Sling of David. So far, it seems, under revision, because the results of its combat use were fig.
        1. -1
          19 January 2019 19: 04
          Quote: Krasnodar
          Against the Iskanders there is a David Sling

          Zero chance
          1. +1
            19 January 2019 19: 33
            I don’t think so. The Israelis have relatively good rocket science, everything is constantly tested, developed, implemented and rolled in combat conditions. But, of course, it will be possible to speak about concrete results only after the combat use of Iskander. The rest is slogans and assumptions.
            1. 0
              19 January 2019 20: 06
              Quote: Krasnodar
              I do not think

              Noticeably
              1. +3
                19 January 2019 20: 08
                laughing ... And I did not think that the S-300 will stop the bombing of Syria hi
  8. 0
    19 January 2019 18: 09
    What exactly do Americans want to cover with a similar system? Indeed, judging by the distance of use, these are objects practically adjacent to combat operations.
    For me, the Americans bought technologies for themselves, if the dome itself was bought, then in small quantities.
    1. +1
      19 January 2019 18: 15
      For them in Afghanistan NURSami naughty. To protect their bases, other objects.
    2. +2
      20 January 2019 11: 56
      Quote: APASUS

      What exactly do Americans want to cover with a similar system? Indeed, judging by the distance of use, these are objects practically adjacent to combat operations.
      For me, the Americans bought technologies for themselves, if the dome itself was bought, then in small quantities.

      First of all - autonomous bases
  9. -6
    19 January 2019 18: 18
    Full trash is the same. Leaky system
    1. +4
      19 January 2019 18: 26
      And Israel itself is bespont. )))
      If it weren’t for American help, it would have been merged as early as 67 .. that is, in the 73rd (I forgot that Amers began to help Jews after the Six Day War).
      In short, bespontovye Jews sold stupid Americans worthless trash for nothing unsecured green candy wrappers. Do you know what is the external debt of the USA? laughing
      Quote: Hypersonic
      Full trash is the same. Leaky system
      1. 0
        19 January 2019 19: 03
        Quote: Krasnodar
        Do you know what is the external debt of the USA?

        By the way, in the UK, the ratio of debt to GDP is many times worse than pre-bankruptcy rates in the United States
        1. +2
          19 January 2019 19: 30
          I haven’t read about the British, the American for the size of their economy (calculated in relation to GDP) is the 34th in the world.
    2. +4
      19 January 2019 18: 40
      Quote: Hypersonic
      Full trash is the same. Leaky system

      And there is. But Americans are known to be dumb.
      1. +1
        20 January 2019 10: 21
        Quote: professor
        Quote: Hypersonic
        Full trash is the same. Leaky system

        And there is. But Americans are known to be dumb.

        There is one oddity in your video, it turns out that wedding operator , knows where the raid and even the approximate firing altitude will come from?
        1. 0
          20 January 2019 11: 42
          Quote: APASUS
          There is one oddity in your video, it turns out that the operator at the wedding knows where the raid and even the approximate firing altitude will come from?

          Even the student knows which side of Gaza. Anyway, this is a matter of chance and the desire to catch such an event in the frame. By the way, this shelling and interception was shot on a dozen cameras by different people. Generation iPhone.
          1. 0
            20 January 2019 12: 03
            Quote: professor
            Even the student knows which side of Gaza.

            This is understandable, but the student should not be in the know, this is a mortar mortar or a rocket, and here the operator took off quite consciously
            1. 0
              20 January 2019 13: 41
              Quote: APASUS
              Quote: professor
              Even the student knows which side of Gaza.

              This is understandable, but the student should not be in the know, this is a mortar mortar or a rocket, and here the operator took off quite consciously

              Well yes. Does the air-raid siren mean nothing?
              1. 0
                21 January 2019 18: 37
                Quote: professor
                Well yes. Does the air-raid siren mean nothing?

                I'll try to explain it differently
                Mina didn’t glow when approaching, the rocket engine just glowed, but the operator knew that he couldn’t get hit by a mortar strike, so he took off so freely.
                1. +1
                  21 January 2019 19: 06
                  Quote: APASUS
                  Quote: professor
                  Well yes. Does the air-raid siren mean nothing?

                  I'll try to explain it differently
                  Mina didn’t glow when approaching, the rocket engine just glowed, but the operator knew that he couldn’t get hit by a mortar strike, so he took off so freely.

                  It was not a mortar attack. Mines do not reach Be'er Sheva. Where Gaza is known even to children. The siren reported the shelling. What is the difficulty to catch the interception in the frame?
  10. +1
    19 January 2019 18: 24
    It would be better if we bought armor.
    1. +2
      19 January 2019 18: 49
      It would be better if we bought armor.

      I think they have it for a long time and already dismantled by cogs
  11. +1
    19 January 2019 18: 35
    The US Department of Defense is ready to acquire the Israeli air defense system Iron Dome


    Is it they who are so protected from Venezuela? lol
  12. 0
    19 January 2019 19: 52
    It is believed that in this way, the United States wants to show other customers that the system is excellent, you need to take it. Thus, enter into competition with s-350 and thus try to deprive Russia of foreign exchange earnings in this area. Secretly subsidizing an iron dome, the usa may well significantly reduce the export price of the dome. The important thing is that the Americans, supplying 50% of the kit, if successful, will earn money. Well, they will protect their petriots from the need to demonstrate their abilities in public. We would have in Russia such a partner as Israel, with its scientists and designers!
    1. +2
      19 January 2019 20: 49
      Quote: Love is
      The US wants to show other customers that the system is excellent, you need to take it. Thus, enter into competition with -350 and thus try to deprive Russia of foreign exchange earnings in this area.

      Have you ever read who the Dome is (5-70 km) and what Vityaz (70-200 km) is?
      1. 0
        19 January 2019 21: 08
        OK, substitute "Buk-M3"
  13. 0
    19 January 2019 20: 40
    The Yankees themselves can do anything now? laughing
    1. +3
      19 January 2019 21: 17
      Quote: Bone1
      The Yankees themselves can do anything now? laughing

      Aircraft carriers laughing
  14. +2
    19 January 2019 22: 52
    How unpatriotic :)
  15. 0
    19 January 2019 23: 20
    The Iron Dome system is designed to intercept unguided tactical missiles at ranges from 4 to 70 km.
    The near zone, takes in quantity .... smile
  16. +2
    20 January 2019 01: 39
    [quote = Krasnodar
    I wonder by what signs is this obvious to you? )))
    All the Fajras that Hamas used to fire at Tel Aviv in 2014 are quite normal missiles of industrial, Iranian mass production.
    [/ Quote]
    Is it Russian cornets Hamas didn’t shoot ??
  17. 0
    21 January 2019 20: 24
    Russia needs a similar air defense system so that the launcher is separate from the people. Then, with the defeat of PU, people will not suffer. And we have that Shell, that Wasp, that TOR, that BUKI all with people. There are Jews today, at least two more air defense systems Shell destroyed and one was definitely with people.

    It is clear that this was done to cover the columns of equipment on the march, but we use them for stationary defense, and the enemy uses these. The first attack reveals the position, and the subsequent more massive one works purely on the identified air defense objects. One hit hitting both PU and radar and the calculation of air defense systems.

    Too fat gift as a result receives the opponent.

    And with stationary defense it should be like this:
    - several launchers without people are at the position disguised with a bunch of false targets nearby and in the distance imitating both individual launchers and entire positions;
    - Radars are also separate, possibly several, conventional long-range radars + other systems operating in passive mode, such as OLS like on fighters.
    - management is carried out by wire from a fortified and camouflaged bunker.

    Then the protected crew will work quietly without fear of being destroyed.

    For me, this is the ideal defense scheme. And let wheeled and caterpillar Shells, TORs accompany columns and work as an operational reserve to strengthen some direction.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"