Brigade set C-300B4 will go into service with the Army

52
The Russian Ministry of Defense plans to receive a brigade set of C-300ВХNUMX anti-aircraft missile systems this year, which will be adopted by the air defense units of the Ground Forces. It is reported by the press service of the military.

Brigade set C-300B4 will go into service with the Army




According to the Ministry of Defense, the air defense units of the Ground Forces will receive a brigade set of ground-to-ground missile systems C-300В4, divisional kits for the Buk-М3 and Tor-М2 air defense systems. The new C-300B4 complexes will come into service with the new anti-aircraft missile brigade, which will be formed "in one of the strategic directions." Earlier it was reported that the Ministry of Defense plans to deploy a new brigade in the Russian Arctic.

The S-300B4 anti-aircraft missile system manufactured by Concern EKR Almaz-Antey JSC was created specifically for the Ground Forces and is designed to protect troops during defensive and offensive operations, air defense of military facilities. Three types of hypersonic missiles are armed with the complex. targets C-300B4 capable of hitting 16 missiles flying at speeds up to 4500 m / s.

Earlier it was reported that the C-300B4 division provided anti-aircraft defense of the Russian MTO station in Syrian Tartus, but was later replaced by C-400 Triumph.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    5 January 2019 11: 25
    Figs understand these S-300 and S-400, and there and the S-500 with their many modifications. This is both parallel to the T-72 in various modifications and the T-90 is the same analogue but the T-90 with its modifications and under the new T-90 brand is not T-72, which means it is better or new.
    It is likely that the enemies would rack their brains and get confused. )))
    1. +14
      5 January 2019 11: 31
      With 300B4 - the military air defense system, like the Buk M3, like Tor.
      1. +12
        5 January 2019 11: 58
        Quote: Vadim237
        With 300В4 - military air defense system, like the Beech M3, like Thor

        Anti-aircraft missile system (not a complex, as the article says) was primarily intended to protect troops in places of concentration from nuclear strikes by operational-tactical missiles. For this, the S-300V has self-propelled launchers with two types of missiles, which are designed to combat ballistic and aerodynamic targets. At the same time, the S-300V, in comparison with the S-300P, has a lower fire performance and a longer reload time. But thanks to the tracked chassis, the "military" S-300V air defense system has the best cross-country ability. The S-300V is available both in the Aerospace Forces and in the Air Defense Forces. Under Serdyukov, several brigades of the S-300V air defense missile system and the Buk air defense missile system were transformed into regiments and transferred to the Aerospace Forces. Compared to the S-300P, the tracked S-300V were built about 10 times less.
    2. -3
      5 January 2019 12: 17
      Figs understand these S-300 and S-400,

      It's simple. S-300 PM 3 is S-400, therefore S-400 PM 3 will be S-500 and so on .. So that the adversary trembled more clearly. After all, the first line To the Troops simply add a number to the postfix "B" so that the enemy breaks his head
      1. +4
        5 January 2019 12: 26
        Quote: Tusv
        So that the adversary would tremble more clearly

        Neighing, thanks laughing good
      2. +6
        5 January 2019 12: 36
        Quote: Tusv
        Everything is simple. S-300 PM 3 is S-400

        That yes
        Quote: Tusv
        hence S-400 PM 3 will be S-500

        But this is not. The S-500 differs from the S-400 in principle. It will be a breakthrough
        1. +3
          5 January 2019 13: 11
          Quote: Hypersound
          The S-500 differs from the S-400 in principle. It will be a breakthrough

          Fundamentally? You are joking? The principle is the same as the first air defense systems. Found, brought launched, shot down. Qualitatively - Yes. Hypersound, Space. If long-range shooting at low-flying over the horizon is definitely a breakthrough
  2. +3
    5 January 2019 11: 27
    I have only one question, why not C-400? What about medium-range air defense systems ... like C-350 have been tested and are going to buy.
    1. +2
      5 January 2019 11: 32
      Quote: NEXUS
      I have only one question, why not the S-400?

      It looks like Almaz-Anteya has accumulated a lot of components for this complex. Well, do not dispose of them?
      1. +4
        5 January 2019 13: 03
        Let export options put and sell.
        1. +2
          5 January 2019 13: 47
          Quote: cniza
          Let export options put and sell.

          For export We Antey - 2500 produce and drive. Spare parts for S-300PMU2 deficit. We ourselves need it, until we replace Vityazem
      2. +2
        5 January 2019 13: 05
        Quote: СРЦ П-15
        It looks like Almaz-Anteya has accumulated a lot of components for this complex. Well, do not dispose of them?

        You guessed it! The S-300V4 helped out the 40N6 SAM! Rather, the failure to create this missile for the S-400 ... Despite repeated promises that "just about soon ...!" SAM 40N6 for a long time "to bring to mind" failed! At the same time, missiles of the "300rd stage" (4M3MV / 9MV) with a maximum range of up to 82 km were successfully created for the S-83V350! In the Ministry of Defense, at last, they heard the folk wisdom: "Better a bird in the hand than woodpeckers .... a crane in the sky ..." and agreed to adopt the S-300V4 .... and there the 40N6 missile defense system, finally then arrived in time! wink
      3. +1
        5 January 2019 13: 39
        Quote: SRC P-15
        It looks like Almaz-Anteya has accumulated a lot of components for this complex. Well, do not dispose of them?

        No, Sanya hi . For the Troops, they don’t bother with the first digit, they just change the last one. And about the abundance of components, we recall the Iranian contract. from Russia, they scraped a thread for five PMU2 divisions. Even the S-400 offered
      4. +1
        6 January 2019 00: 23
        Here I completely agree, now these systems are quite enough for Syria.
    2. +3
      5 January 2019 11: 40
      Because the army wants tracked chassis.
      1. +1
        5 January 2019 12: 50
        Quote: ultra
        Because the army wants tracked chassis

        The chassis is just a suspension option. The troops first of all want an autonomous launcher. The crawler chassis is just perfect for this. Received target designation, sat on the belly, deployed the guidance antenna and the launcher, shot down, turned off and washed off to reload hi
    3. +4
      5 January 2019 11: 43
      Quote: NEXUS
      What about medium-range air defense systems ... like C-350 have been tested and are going to buy.

      Here the key word is "going", and these have already been ordered and bought, even when the S-350 was tested.
    4. +7
      5 January 2019 11: 48
      Quote: NEXUS
      I have only one question, why not the S-400?

      Because the S-300V4 is a long-range air defense military complex designed to cover troops directly above the battlefield. This is the most modern modification of the S-300V, which was developed by other enterprises separately from the S-300P systems, the most modern modification of which is the S-400 (the original name is S-300PMU-3). The main specialization of the S-300B4 is the fight against ballistic missiles, although it can work on almost all types of air attacks. By the way, a long arm for this complex flying at 400 km was developed much earlier than for the S-400.
    5. 0
      5 January 2019 12: 12
      Maybe from C400 not everything can be put on a tracked chassis, or they do not fit into the deployment timeline.
    6. +1
      5 January 2019 13: 10
      S350 will not completely replace soon c300v4. This is a kind of addition, the development of existing Russian air defense systems. In the north, it seems to me that they will use more c300v4 and not c350. C350 until it, like c300, at one time will be converted into caterpillars, it will not be very common with us in the north, and other inaccessible places of our homeland. And where the road network c350 is more or less developed, it will be put into service.
      1. +1
        5 January 2019 13: 14
        Quote: StudentVK
        C350 will not completely replace soon with 300в4.

        Vityaz is not able to replace C-300В4, since these are two completely different complexes in terms of interception radius. C-350 will go to replace C-300PS and BUK (partially).
        S-300V4 is a "long arm" military complex, I think it is not inferior to the Triumph.
        1. 0
          5 January 2019 13: 36
          Quote: NEXUS
          Vityaz is not able to replace the S-300V4, since these are two completely different complexes along the interception radius.

          A significant drawback of the S-300 air defense system as a class is the unsatisfactory interception of low-flying targets at maximum ranges of the affected area. I'll let you read the article, I think, reconsider your opinion. The Vityaz air defense missile system S-350 has occupied (or rather eliminated the problem) a whole niche in the country's air defense system. The S-350 is superior to its predecessor in many respects - from the number of missiles (12 instead of 4) to management system improvements (the new complex is fully automated).
          They are already on the track. Https: //army-news.ru/2018/02/zrs-s-350-vityaz-zanyal-celuyu-nishu-v-sisteme-pvo/
          1. 0
            5 January 2019 13: 40
            Quote: Mar. Tira
            A significant drawback of the S-300 air defense system as a class is the unsatisfactory interception of low-flying targets at the maximum ranges of the affected area

            I repeat, the S-350 is a MEDIUM-radius air defense system. And the "classmate" Vityaz-BUK copes well with low-flying targets.
            Here the issue of deployment time is still very important, and yes, whether on a tracked platform or on a wheeled one.
            1. +4
              5 January 2019 14: 17
              Quote: NEXUS
              I repeat, the S-350 is a medium-range air defense system

              The average is conditional. Vityaz Universal contraption. Pictured are Missiles for Vityaz 9M96E, 9M96E2 and 48H6E2.

              Up to 200 km. You can’t call average
              1. +2
                5 January 2019 14: 44
                Quote: Tusv
                The average is conditional.

                That's right! The problems of the S-350 were just with such a missile. Now judging by the publications, it has been eliminated. Let's hope that this is true? Besides, what is not known about the trials in its real military operations in Syria? The mystery is covered in darkness. But the fact that Ukrainians. The U.S. radar from the S-300 was transmitted to the United States, although the old model is bad.
                1. +3
                  5 January 2019 15: 00
                  Quote: Mar. Tira
                  That's right! The problems of the S-350 were precisely with such a missile. Now judging by the publications, it has been eliminated. Let's hope that this is true?

                  A little bit wrong Oleg hi ... Vityaz was planned to be put into production on the Korean element base and everything was ready: "And here. Bam! Second shift" - Translation into Russian. Praise to Anteyschik !!! We did it. Alas, there are no Russian gas turbines for Admirals yet
                2. 0
                  5 January 2019 17: 00
                  The trick is dear that a lot has already been handed over to the amers, unfortunately. And to be honest, I’m sure at one million percent that everything that can be done regarding this radar was transmitted earlier. WE in the 90s sold them all s300v including ALL radars, etc. And the drawings of the latest yak vertical take-off? A training ship with a laser installation ???? The last Ukrainians sold by the way. It’s just by the way, so that you don’t go into a lot of depression.
                  1. +3
                    5 January 2019 17: 39
                    Quote: StudentVK
                    The trick is dear that a lot has already been handed over to the amers, unfortunately.

                    My P-12 was transferred, stolen, captured many times. This is not a reason to shed tears. Useless then. Codes Your alien changes immediately and a bunch of different chips are screwed. For example, noise immunity. In my P-12 there were two modes for detection and tracking, three modes for interference, and the beam was turned off on the HARM. If the microwave generator does not burn, then replacing it directly with the database takes 3 seconds. By the way, after We captured their Polaris, the Yankees do not know the true range of their Minuten. Explode on the way hi
                    1. +2
                      5 January 2019 17: 55
                      Quote: Tusv
                      This is not a reason to shed tears.

                      I agree, but there is an unpleasant precipitate. In addition, there were specialists from Ukraine with the radar on board. Moreover, experienced and Soviet specialists. According to media reports, the US military will work out measures to counter US aircraft on this radar and find weaknesses. compatriots, in addition to the Soviet developments, even if they weren’t old-fashioned, didn’t cause joy. I immediately remembered Ukrainian experts who had visited Georgia during the Georgian-Ossetian conflict, running away from correspondents and making excuses with shaking lips .. Now they will not make excuses, nationalism has completely consumed them.
                      1. 0
                        5 January 2019 18: 28
                        Quote: Mar. Tira
                        I immediately remembered Ukrainian specialists who had visited Georgia during the Georgian-Ossetian conflict, fleeing from correspondents and making excuses with shaking lips.

                        The sky does not accept shaking lips and hands. In Georgia, the charms were applied after Five !!! lives of Our Pilots, In the last war with the Jews, the Egyptians sent our Asss to the slaughter and did not adjust the air defense as planned - 3 of Our lives. Pilot and navigator 24 drying from the same series. Without cover. Evacuation of Our Three Lives. The sky constantly requires sacrifices, that is, the instruction for blood is written for air defense
                      2. 0
                        6 January 2019 09: 39
                        And think for yourself how many sediments there were in the recent past and some of which we will not know.
                    2. 0
                      5 January 2019 18: 33
                      “I have nothing against Izya” cit. )))) This I wrote just for the overall picture for the “all-finger”. What our smaller brothers did now is the principle of NOW terrible. In the 90s, everything that was bad was sold for a song or donated to our "garnish friends" by the Americans. And this news was nothing more than Uncle Petya from an ordinary Izhevsk factory stole an old Kalash)))) And the specialists there were “ours” in any way. They have been doing these exercises sooooo long ago. So everything is the same in Baghdad.)
        2. +2
          5 January 2019 15: 37
          Quote: NEXUS
          S-300V4 is a "long arm" military complex, I think it is not inferior to the Triumph.

          Andrei hi Pay attention to the difference between the Troops and the Aerospace Forces (aka object). It can be seen with an unarmed gaze. The Voyskoviks have practically autonomous armored launchers with their own antenna post. TOP, Beech, Antey -2500, S-300V4. Everything is done according to this principle in order to unite in a few minutes into an impenetrable cluster. Videoconferencing are made according to the principle - "kiss me with a run, I stand behind a tree", but I will wave a club
        3. 0
          5 January 2019 16: 53
          In the s300v4 troops, this is the same as for the s400 object defense. Just personally, I think that the c350 so far in any case will be a kind of addition, with which it will be possible to dramatically change the number of combat-ready missiles in launchers, since they say that the c350 is a kind of hybrid of the c300 and beech, because it is assumed that those goals that were previously not good enough they took c300 and they were picked up by beeches now with the help of this modified complex they will be picked up with the help of ONE air defense system, and this is great.
          1. +1
            5 January 2019 17: 12
            Quote: StudentVK
            because it is assumed that those goals that the c300 hadn’t picked up well enough and the beeches were picking them up now with the help of this improved complex will be picked up with the help of ONE zr, and this is great.

            The US suggests air defense is available. We operate with various complexes, from which we do not suffer. The Austrians said in 2012 that 6 thousand simultaneous salvo missiles would not be enough to overcome the VKSnikov, and here also the Troops. We multiply by three, and the American budget in two. Elementary crack
          2. 0
            5 January 2019 18: 56
            Quote: StudentVK
            Just personally, I think that the c350 so far in any case will be a kind of addition, with which it will be possible to dramatically change the number of combat-ready missiles in launchers

            Do not think. Know. With 350 chtuchka -dryuchka. But!!! I do not agree with Lelik One tablet is not enough. Our goal is all NATO aviation and Our supremacy. hi
      2. 0
        6 January 2019 06: 49
        Here I think you need to dance on whether it will be an object air defense or military. That is, he either put it near the factory or the airfield and it will stand there for years, or it, as part of a convoy, dangles along the roads and shoots where it comes from.
    7. 0
      5 January 2019 13: 45
      Quote: NEXUS
      so it’s like C-350 tested and are going to buy

      It just needs to be purchased, that is, built, but this one already exists. Of course you can cut into needles, but why? Let it serve for now, but in time it will also be replaced.
  3. 0
    5 January 2019 11: 40
    Quote: Irokez
    Figs understand these S-300 and S-400, and there and the S-500 with their many modifications. This is both parallel to the T-72 in various modifications and the T-90 is the same analogue but the T-90 with its modifications and under the new T-90 brand is not T-72, which means it is better or new.
    It is likely that the enemies would rack their brains and get confused. )))

    This is a type of upgrade.
    At the beginning of S-125, 75, 200, 300, etc.
    1. -1
      5 January 2019 12: 33
      C - +100500.
      1. +2
        5 January 2019 12: 39
        Jirinovskiy Edition
  4. +4
    5 January 2019 12: 04
    Great complex. In some ways, even better than the S-400
  5. -5
    5 January 2019 12: 09
    It would be better if they were delivered to Syria .. There they are needed! It is in BV that the fate of Russia is decided. soldier
    There are all leverage ..
  6. +3
    5 January 2019 12: 30
    For sure, amateurs can not deal with these conventions. It is much closer and more understandable that the S-300V4 complex will be delivered to the Ground Forces to protect them in specific areas
  7. +4
    5 January 2019 12: 50
    The new S-300V4 complexes will enter service with a new anti-aircraft missile brigade, which will be formed "in one of the strategic directions."
    So they returned to a purely brigade state? And then, judging by the information earlier, "300s" were cut and mixed with Buki. Probably to form additional brigades.
    They can still defend the positions of our strategic missile divisions /// which is not the direction ///. And one of the brigades /// also again formed /// is exactly what this is doing in our vast outback.
    1. 0
      5 January 2019 16: 19
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      So back to the purely brigadier state?

      On B4, there are 2 missiles on an autonomous launcher, and the types of interceptor 3. Already the Brigade principle, as before 75, 125 and 200. Low Altitude, High Altitude, Far
      And then, judging by the information earlier, "300s" were cut and mixed with Buki.

      More likely intensified. The cluster is more powerful than one server
    2. 0
      5 January 2019 16: 55
      And do not forget that in the good old air defense brigade, there was a regiment of merciless Su-27 and MiG-29
  8. +3
    5 January 2019 15: 30
    ... The S-300V4 system, in comparison with the systems of the previous generation, has an extended area that is two to three times covered from air strikes and an increased range of the border of the zone of destruction of air targets. These parameters, in particular, provide guaranteed interception of the warheads of medium-range ballistic missiles. The S-300V4 air defense system is a modification of the S-300VM system, which has higher tactical and technical characteristics due to the introduction of modern computing facilities and hardware, the use of new components. The new system is capable of hitting ballistic and aerodynamic targets at ranges up to 400 km. The contract for the supply of S-300B4 air defense systems to the RF Armed Forces was concluded in 2012. The first set of this system was transferred to the customer in December 2014 as part of the agreement between the concern and the Russian Ministry of Defense. soldier
    https://defence.ru/article/10867/
  9. -1
    5 January 2019 16: 43
    When you receive, then write. Why is it in vain to crush the water in the mortar.
  10. 0
    5 January 2019 19: 04
    The new S-300V4 complexes will enter service with a new anti-aircraft missile brigade, which will be formed "in one of the strategic directions."

    1st TA she would come in handy ...
    Earlier it was reported that the Ministry of Defense plans to deploy a new brigade in the Russian Arctic.

    It is unlikely that this SZRK refers to military air defense, and in the Arctic we do not have large formations and associations of military units ....
  11. 0
    6 January 2019 10: 24
    And no one, not even Bongo, paid attention to the phrase -
    will receive a brigade set of S-300V4 air defense systems, and divisional sets of Buk-M3 and Tor-M2 air defense systems.
    So, the brigade kit for Weshek is precisely the anti-aircraft missile brigade (SRBR), and the divisional kit for Thor is the anti-aircraft missile regiment (SRP) with a motorized rifle or tank division. But if Thor was always in a divisional or brigade air defense, then Buki used to be in anti-aircraft brigades at the army level (at the front level - S-300V). In other words, it seems that the information that Buki was being lowered into divisional air defense turned out to be correct.
  12. 0
    6 January 2019 14: 54
    Quote: Tusv
    Quote: NEXUS
    I repeat, the S-350 is a medium-range air defense system

    The average is conditional. Vityaz Universal contraption. Pictured are Missiles for Vityaz 9M96E, 9M96E2 and 48H6E2.

    Up to 200 km. You can’t call average

    Namesake! And where did you get the idea that the Vityaz will have 48N6E2 missiles ?? In your photo, taken by EMNIP at one of the MAKS at the end of the last decade (either MAKS-2008, or MAKS-2009), there are photographs of three missiles of the S-300PMU-2 Favorit complex. By the way, on the largest of these missiles, 48N6E2, this inscription is readable. For the S-350 "Vityaz" air defense missile system, 9M100 missiles and two missiles from the 9M96 family are intended. The first - 9M96 has a range of 40 km, the second - 9M96E2 - 120 km. ZUR 48N6E2 is not even close there ...

    Quote: Tusv
    On B4, 2 missiles on an autonomous launcher, and types of interceptor 3.

    Can I find out which ones? as far as I remember, the military version (S-300Vh) had 9M82 missiles of various modifications (two at the launch) and 9M83 missiles of various modifications (4 at the launch). Where did they suddenly come from? THREE TYPES OF INTERCEPTORS?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"