Black and bold. What will be the future American multipurpose helicopter

51
SB1 Defiant

At the end of December, one of the most interesting aviation events of the outgoing year: the appearance of a promising multipurpose helicopter with the complex name Sikorsky-Boeing SB1 Defiant (English “daring”, “defiant”, “disobedient”) was presented. The development is based on the promising Future Vertical Lift program, designed to give the American military a whole family of high-speed helicopters.





If you have experienced a state of déjà vu when you see SB-1, do not be surprised. Americans have long and, in general, very successfully experience his fellow in the face of Sikorsky S-97 Raider. New SB1 can not be called a modification of this machine in the full sense of the word. Helicopters are designed to solve completely different tasks: as much as the tasks for rotary-wing machines in general may differ among themselves.

Recall that the S-97 is a relatively small helicopter with a crew of two and the ability to carry up to six troops. This is either a scout, or a light striker, or a base for the future drone. Most often it is seen as a high-speed replacement for the small Bell OH-58 Kiowa helicopter, which has almost outlived its usefulness. The attack "Apache" helicopter S-97, most likely, will never replace: the Americans generally intend to operate the AH-64 almost until the 2050s. Recently, by the way, it became known that Boeing wants to remake the legendary helicopter, supplying it with a pusher propeller. This would theoretically increase flight speed by 50 percent. But how it will be in practice, of course, is unknown, because radical alterations do not always benefit old machines, if we talk about their flight performance. Often this leads to an abrupt increase in mass with quite predictable consequences.

By the way, it is the presence of the pushing screw in the tail section that makes S-97 Raider and SB1 Defiant so similar. As well as the use in the design of both helicopters coaxial rotor. But this, as we have said, similarities end there. The fact is that the helicopter shown now will be by default a much larger machine capable of performing a much wider range of tasks. Simply put, this is a possible replacement for the famous Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk - the main American multipurpose army helicopter. Like him, Defiant is able to predetermine the appearance of the US Army for many decades.



The importance of the program is difficult to overestimate. For all its merits, the Black Hawk has speed limits inherent in any “classic” helicopter, due to the aerodynamic concept itself. The maximum speed indicated in open sources for the UH-60L is 300 kilometers per hour with a cruising speed of just over 280. For comparison, the SB1 Defiant’s estimated cruising speed should be 460 kilometers per hour. The difference is huge. And, it must be supposed, the broad use of SB1 Defiant will give the American army the capabilities that it had never dreamed of. At the same time, no other country in the world has plans for the mass introduction of high-speed helicopters in the foreseeable future.
Helicopter characteristics

At the heart of the SB1 Defiant design itself is the experimental apparatus Sikorsky X2, which, prior to closing its program, managed to set at least one unofficial speed record, having sped up to 415 kilometers per hour. The pilot helicopter coaxially with the pusher propeller was built on the basis of the experimental S-69. “The secret of the coaxial unit X2 is that the main counter-rotating screws provide lift and forward flight without a tail screw. Above 150 knots (277,8 km / h) thrust is provided by a pushing screw, so the main screws do what they do best - provide a lift, ”said Chris Van Buyten, who as of 2016 was the vice president of innovative projects in Sikorsky company. It is noteworthy that for the SB1, two far from new Honeywell T55 engines were chosen as the basis for the power plant: the same ones were installed on Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopters. However, they are being upgraded specifically for Defiant, and in the future they can equip the helicopter with a fundamentally new power plant.



Built on the base of the SB1 Defiant, the serial vehicle will be able to carry out transport operations, land landing forces, carry out search and rescue operations, evacuate the wounded from the battlefield, and carry out a number of other tasks. Crew - four people. On board it will be possible to mark twelve paratroopers or cargo with a solid mass. The use of the SB1 Defiant cannot be ruled out as a strike helicopter, however, as far as can be judged, this possibility will be purely optional. Do not forget that in addition to "Apache", "Vipers" and combat aircraft of tactical aviation at the disposal of the Americans have a drone UAV, which can also be effectively used for ground support. And, of course, A-10, which will serve the United States faithfully and faithfully for some time until they are replaced, for example, F-35A or F-35B.

Pitfalls

SB1 Defiant is not to be afraid of machines that are designed for other tasks, but Bell V-280 Valor converters, which, in general, have similar characteristics. This, we recall, is a promising convertoplane that is already undergoing flight tests. Like the SB1, it can carry more than ten people landing, and the speed of the V-280 is even higher - the maximum is 520 kilometers per hour. Of course, the US Department of Defense has enough finances, but it must be assumed that the military will choose one aircraft: either SB1 or V-280. And so far Valor is ahead.



On the way he can become perhaps a very ambiguous experience in operating tiltrotor Marine Corps. "V-22 looks great ... when it is not idle in the repair," - said at the time the late Senator John McCain. Indeed, catastrophes, technical failures and a low level of combat readiness pursued V-22 all his life. Do not forget that Osprey built a relatively small series: for Bell V-280 Valor, which is considered as a massive device, such difficulties are completely unacceptable. In general, it is difficult to say with confidence now which one will be the winner. It may well be that none of the devices created will not suit the US military. And they will eventually remain faithful to the Black Hawk.

At the same time, in other countries they should understand that if the revolutionary high-speed helicopters really “shoot”, then their more familiar counterparts will ultimately remain out of work. And the global market of multifunctional rotary-wing machines will be divided among themselves Bell, Sikorsky and Boeing. “Boring” option, but so far it looks the most plausible.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    5 January 2019 05: 11
    Cool car! At one time, the “Cheyenne” was not strong enough, but this one will probably be brought to mind.
    1. KCA
      -11
      5 January 2019 06: 14
      Like the F-35, "Zumvolt", LCS, Bradley and many, many other ambitious US projects, will lead, bring, someday, to the complete collapse of the US military-industrial complex.
      1. -1
        5 January 2019 06: 47
        Unfortunately, they will not be brought. We must not wait until a dead enemy swims past, and do something ourselves. So far, Kamov and MiG have been pushed in our place and they are actively promoting stillborn slag projects of Sukhoi and Mily.
        1. KCA
          +1
          5 January 2019 07: 11
          MIG-35, which was accepted for state tests pushing? Or KA-226, 200 of which were sold to India?
        2. +1
          6 January 2019 16: 27
          Quote: Slinqshot
          push Kamov and MiG and actively promote stillborn slag projects of Sukhoi and Mil

          In fairness, we have a Miles project for a high-speed helicopter. There are positive results from the operation of the experimental machine: the media wrote that the old helicopters will receive new blades. A completely new machine is being developed.

          At the same time, Kamov confirmed the high performance characteristics of his beautiful machines and, most likely, the Ka-52 will eventually completely displace the Mi-28 from army aircraft.

          How did Sukhoi not suit you? Over the past 20 years, they are the most successful company and design bureau in the Russian aircraft industry. It is more likely to say that in order to save Yak, the MO refused at one time from a series of successful single-engine light fighters (it’s ridiculous, but the MiG-AT craft, which lost the competition by points to all projects, are now again trying to cram into the VKS). It is thanks to Sukhoi that our VKS have at their disposal aircraft capable of confidently fighting (with generations up to 4 ++) and confronting (with 5 generations) with Western classmates. They have not weak indicators in civil aviation: so that no one speaks, but the Superjet nevertheless as a project has taken place and continues to develop successfully.

          MiG against this background does not look very good (forum users forgive me): the MiG-35 has not been a light machine for a long time either in the TT sense or in the economic sense + constant problems for export customers in terms of maintenance and, in fact, the lack of any or radically new well-known machine designs - all this greatly undermined the reputation of the legendary design bureau. And do not blame everything on the leadership and Sukhoi lobbyists: no one forced, for example, Malaysia to replace their MiGs with Sushki or India to choose not the MiG-29, but the Su-30 as the main fighter.
    2. -1
      5 January 2019 06: 43
      Considering how many years are already busy, they will bring to mind
    3. +1
      5 January 2019 08: 16
      Quote: irazum
      Cool car! At one time, the “Cheyenne” was not strong enough, but this one will probably be brought to mind.

      I agree. Very beautiful car.
  2. 0
    5 January 2019 06: 36
    I look at these machines all the time, and I don’t understand what it is impossible to use a gas-dynamic, jet drive to install. At one time they even worked on the Ka-50.
    1. +1
      7 January 2019 22: 03
      Are you talking about the NOTAR scheme? It was abandoned back in the 80s of the last century, there was a Ka-117 project and a small Bell series, it seems.
      1. +1
        8 January 2019 22: 42
        Not really NOTAR, NOTAR uses a gas injection fan without gas turbine engine exhaust, and I'm talking about a project for the Ka-50, here's a diagram
        1. +1
          8 January 2019 22: 47
          Thanks for the picture, I’ll ask the guys - Kamovites, on occasion, what they were doing there. Very reminiscent of the Ka-117, of course, that scheme was single-rotor, which is surprising for Kamovites. Air for different gas-dynamic devices is usually taken from the second circuit of the compressor, since in GTE a lot of power is removed from the rotor, and very little remains in the exhaust.
        2. +1
          8 January 2019 23: 17
          For me, this scheme is preferable for combat helicopters, a decrease in resistance due to the absence of "mugs" EVU as on the Mi-24,28,35 and Ka-50 and more efficient mixing and cooling of hot gases of the gas turbine engine.
        3. -1
          14 March 2019 08: 36
          It is necessary to change the physical processes on devices in contact with the elastic medium of flight. That is, changing the physical principles of the propulsion, the flight will not only be effective, but simply change the balance of positive effects and those that we call inertia and resistance.
  3. 0
    5 January 2019 06: 48
    And the global market for multifunctional rotorcraft will be divided between Bell, Sikorsky and Boeing. A “boring” option, but so far it looks the most believable.

    Author, finish eating raw tomatoes at night. And we have similar work on high-speed helicopters in the MIL Design Bureau and the Kamov Design Bureau in Europe and Asia.
    The priority issue of projects, of which each MO of countries has its own.
    1. -1
      14 March 2019 08: 39
      Yes, but everyone adheres to the same physical principles of interaction with the flight environment. Therefore, there is no point in expecting something new and effective, and even more so breakthrough and advanced.
  4. +2
    5 January 2019 06: 54
    Mdaaaa! We must accelerate!
    1. +10
      5 January 2019 11: 19
      draw more pictures?
    2. 0
      5 January 2019 20: 28
      Cool beautiful pictures, I'm sure that cartoons will also be of excellent quality.
      1. +1
        6 January 2019 16: 29
        Cartoons suddenly turned out to be true :)
        Kamov has long been a competitor to Mile on the program of high-speed cars. In that year, MO actually announced that Miles was the winner. Moreover, the latter also has a real flying machine, which is largely based on the classical scheme.
  5. +3
    5 January 2019 10: 05
    Oh yes, with this MiG 35 already 30 years messing around. Only this is not a new car, but a natural modernization. And how many of them are in the troops? They plan to collect Ka 226 in 3 years, knowing the Indians - everything can change a lot. But I was not talking about a agricultural machine for spraying, but about a combat vehicle for the RA.
  6. 0
    5 January 2019 12: 20
    Dear author!
    You write that "the widespread use of the SB1 Defiant will give the American army capabilities that it never dreamed of before," without saying a word about any advantages of high-speed helicopters, and at the same time you point out that "no other country in the world has plans for the massive introduction of high-speed helicopters in the foreseeable future. " So maybe they are not needed, these high-speed helicopters? Judging by the pictures of the "couch strategists", they are rather cumbersome, archaic, most likely more difficult to manufacture and operate, and therefore less reliable. In a word, "the more glowing and spinning in the car, the worse."
    1. +2
      6 January 2019 18: 19
      To be honest, I asked the same question. High-speed helicopters are, of course, great and beautiful, but the question "so what?" Army men will be much more useful from such prosaic things as reconnaissance, target designation, interaction of flyers with infantry. The same black hawk has a practical range of about 580 km. Those. one way an hour on the fly and the same amount cruising back. If you urgently need to drive to the range limit, the new product will play 24 minutes in one direction. But how often is it required?
      I am not familiar with statistics, but I suspect that in the same Afghanistan or Vietnam, helicopter pilots rarely had to fly more than 50-100 km. And here the beginner’s win in time will be 4-8 minutes. Naturally, these minutes can be critical. But it’s easier to win back by building competent interaction. Roughly speaking, the rotorcraft could be called quickly and without coordination at the level of the division headquarters. In extreme cases - you can enter the air patrol near the required areas.
      In my opinion, such factors as the reliability of the machine (not like when half the fleet is under repair), the ability to quickly start it, the payload, the same cost and economy (it is better to have heels mi-17 than one wunderrefleu) is somewhat more important.
      Therefore, I also do not understand what "opportunities that she had never dreamed of before" will be given by this apparatus of the American army.
      1. 0
        13 January 2019 20: 56
        You just kind of look weird. You count the transfer of something somewhere. Or evacuation and how much it will pour out every 24 minutes of winning. Faster arrival will mean fewer opportunities to meet and so on. For one helicopter, this is of course not essential.
  7. +2
    5 January 2019 12: 59
    Do not fire - the propeller on the helicopter works with extremely low efficiency due to the powerful falling air flow from the rotor.

    The very idea of ​​making an underplane out of a helicopter is inherently delusional - a virtual "wing" in the form of rotating rotor blades is the most ineffective of all types of wings. Of course, if you attach a 1 hp engine. for 1 kg of weight, then the door will fly, but why?

    Pilage budget, definitely.
    1. +1
      6 January 2019 17: 26
      "extremely low efficiency from the falling flow of the main rotor" cannot be lower than from the physical shutdown of the "breathing chamber", as, for example, in all air intakes with engines in the aircraft tail, at a critical steep climb.
      The idea of ​​making an airplane out of a helicopter is extremely attractive
      1. 0
        6 January 2019 17: 57
        There is another thing - the flow from the main rotor distorts the flow from the pushing rotor, moreover, in any operating mode of the latter.
        1. 0
          6 January 2019 19: 49
          in a horizontal (cruising) flight, the angle of attack of the rotor blades can be minimal, i.e. it is a wing, and the pushing screw is behind
          1. 0
            6 January 2019 22: 17
            Even with a minimum angle of attack of the rotor blades, the flow from it falls onto the pushing screw.
            1. 0
              13 January 2019 20: 57
              Well, firstly, maybe this is not critical or is easily compensated. And in some projects it was generally intended to fix the rotor.
  8. +2
    5 January 2019 14: 36
    "What will be the American multipurpose helicopter of the future"
    Let it be "golden" first and then useless.
  9. -1
    5 January 2019 15: 17
    "...And, presumably, the widespread use of SB1 Defiant will give the American army opportunities that it had never dreamed of before. Wherein no other country in the world has no plans for the mass introduction of high-speed helicopters in foreseeable future..... "
    =======
    Oh oh oh!!! TsAGI has been carrying out "purges" of a large-scale model of a promising combat helicopter of the "Kaiova" company for a long time !!!! At WHAT stage is the project - so far kept in secret .... But apparently - the work "has gone far enough" ..... When will the flight prototype appear? In a year, two, three, four? It's not clear yet!!!
    BUT! The statement of the author (Ilya Legat), that "... no other country in the world has plans for the mass introduction of high-speed helicopters in the foreseeable future ..." ... This, sorry, we will leave ON CONSCIENCE Author (Ilya Legat) - and his personal ambitions !!! (For such statements, you need to be MUCH more informed (than the author) about the "closed" topics of the domestic military-industrial complex !!!) .... hi
    1. +1
      5 January 2019 18: 08
      When there will be a flying prototype - then we will talk about real results. In the meantime, these are rumors and presentations in the Dassault style with a piece of fused plastic as a prototype of a 6th generation fighter
  10. -1
    5 January 2019 16: 57
    Again they are trying to build a helicopter with a pushing propeller, they again break off, most likely. Or have they come up with something so that the pushing screw does not interfere with the work of the carrier?
    Again, they’re doing every little thing, instead of building a normal military transporter with a loading capacity of 8-10 tons, to carry normal artillery or light equipment, and not fool around with a gold 777.
    1. 0
      5 January 2019 18: 13
      She is not golden, she is luminous laughing
      1. +1
        5 January 2019 23: 03
        You look at the price, the price is like gold
        1. 0
          5 January 2019 23: 26
          Yes, I know her story)
          I decided to make a joke and play along with you, but the joke failed recourse
  11. +1
    5 January 2019 17: 54
    I did not understand what leitmotif the respected author wanted to convey to us. But he counted 6 spelling errors. )
  12. 0
    5 January 2019 17: 55
    but certainly he is not cocky
  13. 0
    5 January 2019 19: 46
    A coaxial helicopter will experience even greater air resistance than a traditional helicopter. The pushing screw here will not do weather for maximum speed.

    Turnkey planes are still not a dead end. It’s just that the Americans failed to build a reliable car.

    In Russia, it seems, also has its own project for high-speed helicopter.
    1. -4
      5 January 2019 20: 26
      All this is a dead end branch that makes the whales, push do our air defense forces wait hours X
  14. -4
    5 January 2019 20: 25
    An excellent target for our air defense systems. There will be something to exercise our air defense and VKS forces
  15. -1
    5 January 2019 22: 49
    Why discuss a riding mockup? -Do-we’ll see — for amers, just a coaxial circuit is unseen, they are still tormented, and sticking an engine into a helicopter’s ass in a coaxial circuit is simple, only how do the rotors behave at a higher speed? The Yankees have had an Osprey for a long time — it seems like a more reasonable scheme — something is not painfully audible and development is not visible — yes, and why do you especially need to increase the speed of the helicopter? -When it was 300, it’s 450, and what?
  16. 0
    5 January 2019 22: 59
    Again some cuttlefish. They have a special view of aesthetics.
  17. 0
    6 January 2019 02: 35
    Quote: Slinqshot
    So far, Kamov and MiG have been pushed in our place and they are actively promoting stillborn slag projects of Sukhoi and Mily.

    in the circumstances, Russia simply cannot promote two competitor projects, as was done during the time of the Union. It is simply financially impossible. The capabilities of the Union are not yet available. But for now.
  18. +1
    6 January 2019 20: 11
    Taki switched to Kamov's scheme !!
    Well, let's see how they master it ..
    I write without jerking - it is interesting that the Americans, in principle, intelligent techies, have only now begun to master this scheme ...
  19. 0
    6 January 2019 20: 14
    Interestingly, the pushing screw and eight blades are low-speed, which means (I mean the number of blades)
    1. 0
      7 January 2019 03: 24
      There is another question. Why just do a screw? A turbine with a power intake from the main engines and an air intake from the outer part of the fuselage.
  20. +1
    9 January 2019 01: 33
    Quote: Aviator_
    Thanks for the picture, I’ll ask the guys - Kamovites, on occasion, what they were doing there. Very reminiscent of the Ka-117, of course, that scheme was single-rotor, which is surprising for Kamovites. Air for different gas-dynamic devices is usually taken from the second circuit of the compressor, since in GTE a lot of power is removed from the rotor, and very little remains in the exhaust.

    For single-rotor yes, but the coaxial scheme with zero gyroscopicity, that is, initially balanced, and since all gas-turbine engines go to the reducer 80-85% of the power, but the rest is reactive thrust. For example, a gas turbine engine TV3-117 has a maximum power of 2200 hp on the gearbox and about 350-400 hp flies into the nozzle, or somewhere around 170-200 kgf from one engine, the numbers are not accurate, and we have about 400 kgf of thrust in the exhaust, which is not enough for a helicopter.
  21. 0
    13 January 2019 20: 58
    Very beautiful helicopter. In general, the UH-60 itself seems to me the most beautiful and successful transporter at the moment. If you look in general.
  22. 0
    20 February 2019 22: 40
    It is unlikely that anyone should be interested in achieving some fundamental parameters due to the same fundamental others. Achieving high flight speeds by increasing fuel consumption and losing the quality factor of mechanical systems is a step backward, not the future. Therefore, it is worth thinking about new principles for organizing processes in movers.
  23. 0
    19 March 2019 09: 53
    Three propellers - not too much for a multipurpose helicopter? "You can't fit a horse and a quivering doe into one cart," said the classic.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"