The Ministry of Defense has successfully launched a rocket complex "Vanguard"

172
On Wednesday, the Russian Ministry of Defense conducted a valid flight test, during which it carried out a successful test launch of the Avangard missile. The rocket launch was carried out on the instructions of Russian President Vladimir Putin and under his supervision, the Kremlin press service reports.

The Ministry of Defense has successfully launched a rocket complex "Vanguard"




According to the press service, the commander-in-chief arrived at the National Center for Defense Management and from there he gave the command to proceed to the tests. The launch of the Avangard missile with a hypersonic gliding winged combat unit was conducted by combat crews of the Strategic Missile Forces compound from the Dombarovsky positional area using a conventional target at the Kura test site in the Kamchatka Territory.

During the flight at hypersonic speed, the planning winged unit completed vertical and horizontal controlled maneuvering and at the appointed time struck a conventional target on the battlefield of the range
- Reported the press service. The launch confirmed the characteristics incorporated into the planning cruise block of the rocket, which make it possible to bypass the coverage areas of information and fire missile defenses, which ensures effective overcoming of all existing and future missile defense systems.

The Russian Ministry of Defense reported that this successful launch of the Avangard missile is the last, the program of flight test tests has been completed in full. On time, the Avant-garde complex will go into service with the Strategic Missile Forces.

Earlier it was reported that the contract for mass production of Avangard complexes has already been concluded.
172 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +70
    26 December 2018 14: 59
    Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ??? fool What will they howl now? ?? fool Now we have even more "arguments" for the adversaries! good
    1. +31
      26 December 2018 15: 00
      Oh cartoon flew
      1. +27
        26 December 2018 15: 12
        Well, I first wanted to write
        cartoon flew
        .

        But seriously about cartoons and the avant-garde, only a patient can write on his head, after all, he has been flying for years, it’s only a matter of being put on combat duty.
        1. +28
          26 December 2018 15: 21
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Oh cartoon flew



          a couple of dozen of these "cartoons" and we will have no one to sell rocket engines ...

          the most interesting thing is that CNN will not even have time to report it



        2. +29
          26 December 2018 15: 25
          Quote: bk316
          But seriously about cartoons and avant-garde, only a patient can write on his head,

          And they put so many pluses for komenty. Probably the whole house came to Sait
          1. +17
            26 December 2018 15: 54
            faithful to the whole chamber

            What does it mean to come in, they are here now ....
      2. +13
        26 December 2018 15: 31
        Oh cartoon flew

        Here at the end of the cartoon, and who is the enemy, to ... Khan! smile
        1. +4
          26 December 2018 19: 47
          Quote: Skay
          Here at the end of the cartoon, and who is the enemy, to ... Khan!

          Learn to rhyme your posts! For example:
          Here at the end of the cartoon,
          and who is the enemy, to ...
          KAPETS !!! laughing

          Sorry, the filter of "noble girls" does not pass other "beautiful" words! sad
      3. 0
        26 December 2018 17: 41
        The Russian Ministry of Defense reported that given successful pusto the missile of the Avangard complex is the last
        1. +8
          26 December 2018 18: 55
          Amused yourself? laughing
          Just do not cry love
          Further read or hurt?
          The test flight test program has been completed in full.


          They were looking for a representative of the chamber. laughing
          Found it. Boredom without them.
          1. -4
            27 December 2018 03: 54
            for example, for example
      4. 0
        26 December 2018 19: 42
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Oh cartoon flew

        ========
        "Cartoon" - not JUST FLY - it is also on target GOT!!! good
        1. 0
          27 December 2018 08: 19
          Hit just did not show!
      5. 0
        27 December 2018 17: 06
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Oh cartoon flew

        So what? Well, that’s it ... recourse
    2. +25
      26 December 2018 15: 02
      Quote: ANCIENT
      Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ??? fool What will they howl now? ?? fool Now we have even more "arguments" for the adversaries! good

      They confer than "answer" ...
      1. +21
        26 December 2018 15: 11
        "Vanguard" has successfully completed the tests, let it work just as successfully against our enemies. Good luck !!!
        1. +2
          26 December 2018 19: 54
          Quote: Egorovich
          Let it work as successfully for our enemies. Good luck !!!

          Pancake! Around militarists suicide !!
          Maybe it's better as in "The Bremen Town Musicians"?
          ,,, And we keep something in the bosom ...
          Do not come to us,
          Do not come to us ...
          And then - we will slaughter! "(C)
          laughing
      2. +14
        26 December 2018 15: 33
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        They confer than "answer" ...

        They don’t confer; in impotent rage, the cons are sculpted by everyone. Sect of the eternal defeatists and losers
        1. +6
          26 December 2018 19: 46
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          They don’t confer; in impotent rage, the cons are sculpted by everyone.

          =========
          But how could it be otherwise ??? request
          Then you understand: "The plaster is being removed! The client is leaving !!!"

          And suddenly - ON YOU!!!!
    3. +35
      26 December 2018 15: 06
      Where is the sect!? On banderostan. I read their message about the "Vanguard". Like this is an old Soviet missile launched in Dnepropetrovsk. And in general it is a Ukrainian development, brazenly stolen by "Muscovites". If God wants to punish, he will take away the mind.
      1. +5
        26 December 2018 15: 29
        All that the Russian Federation has is created in / in Ukraine! laughing
        This is an axiom !!)))
        1. +14
          26 December 2018 16: 15
          Quote: Siberian barber
          All that the Russian Federation has is created in / in Ukraine! laughing
          This is an axiom !!)))

          So they believe it, like little children fool
          1. +4
            26 December 2018 16: 19
            Excellent photo! good
            It well illustrates that, moreover, EVERYTHING is due to them! laughing
          2. +1
            26 December 2018 17: 40
            Truncated so, Muscovites are to blame! "FIRST LAW OF UKRAINE" in actionsmile.
          3. jjj
            +3
            26 December 2018 18: 37
            Gogol also said that a smarter Ukrainian is becoming - Russian
        2. 0
          26 December 2018 18: 46
          So Kalashnikov MT, the world to his ashes - the most Galician is.
          lol
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. -2
        27 December 2018 04: 28
        Quote: 210ox
        Where is the sect!? On banderostan. I read their message about the "Vanguard". Like this is an old Soviet missile launched in Dnepropetrovsk. And in general it is a Ukrainian development, brazenly stolen by "Muscovites". If God wants to punish, he will take away the mind.

        It looks more like the Soviet development "Albatross".
    4. +18
      26 December 2018 15: 08
      During the flight at hypersonic speed, the planning winged unit completed vertical and horizontal controlled maneuvering and at the appointed time struck a conventional target on the battlefield of the range

      Frankly, bad news for the United States and England.
      Quote: ANCIENT
      Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ???

      Now they will howl that this is all a fake and that this cannot be, since this cannot happen at all, since the laws of physics cannot be deceived ... yeah.
      1. -1
        26 December 2018 15: 21
        Quote: NEXUS
        bad news for the USA and England

        And for England, then what side? More on it to spend it! laughing
        1. -2
          26 December 2018 16: 05
          That's for sure. The main thing is to neutralize the main enemy, and these themselves will be neutralized, i.e. shut up)
        2. +4
          26 December 2018 20: 03
          Quote: victor50
          And for England, then what side? More on it to spend it!

          Well, for the "dear to our heart" insolent Saxons - nothing is a pity !!!
          And, secondly, not a single "pregnant cockroach" from D2 could crawl into the Ocean from Holi-Loch - and "5" is not a pity !!! Let them eat for both cheeks !!!
          AHA.
      2. +7
        26 December 2018 15: 57
        Quote: NEXUS
        Frankly, bad news for the United States and England.

        Let it be accepted as a "congratulation" for the New Year!
      3. +1
        26 December 2018 16: 25
        Quote: NEXUS
        During the flight at hypersonic speed, the planning winged unit completed vertical and horizontal controlled maneuvering and at the appointed time struck a conventional target on the battlefield of the range

        Frankly, bad news for the United States and England.
        Quote: ANCIENT
        Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ???

        Now they will howl that this is all a fake and that this cannot be, since this cannot happen at all, since the laws of physics cannot be deceived ... yeah.

        Here, not everything is so simple!))
        All sorts of "boeings, etc." waiting for orders, rubbing their hands))) for them, this is good news, rather))
        I represent this batch, in Congress, about an increase in appropriations, in connection with "new threats" laughing
      4. +1
        26 December 2018 18: 48
        And what, do not "remember them by name?" Otherwise, I don’t remember who shone and lit after 1.03.18.
      5. -3
        27 December 2018 00: 04
        Quote: NEXUS
        Now they will howl that it's all fake

        1. Telemetry with BB?
        2. Angle shooting of 0 with an UAV, let’s say) hit a given point on the polygon?
        3. The result of the impact of the BB (BS) "Vanguard" on the target target at the range?
        4. Plasma trace (satellite imagery, SARs)?
        5.Results of testing missile defense, air defense on target? Well this is "breaking any existing missile defense", right?
        6. Well, etc.
        well, yes, "okay"
        launch of ICBM RS-18B / 15A35 / UR-100N UTTKhs (FIND 3 "differences" 4202, product 15Yu71, complex 15P771 or?) This is the launch of SS-19 mod.2 Stiletto, based on UR-100N UTTH (RS-18B).

        wassat
        Quote: ANCIENT
        Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ???

        where (1,2,3,4,5,6 itd. (except for Slobludia?
        and the launch of the UR-100N UTTKh - putting the satellite into orbit, for example, any ram will show, and the ram will "eat" any

        I remember ; VV Putin "In 1970-1975 studied at the international branch of the faculty of law Leningrad State University (LSU). "
        I mean a lawyer, in basic education
        1. +9
          27 December 2018 02: 33
          Quote: Aibolit
          1. Telemetry with BB?
          2. Angle shooting of 0 with an UAV, let’s say) hit a given point on the polygon?
          3. The result of the impact of the BB (BS) "Vanguard" on the target target at the range?
          4. Plasma trace (satellite imagery, SARs)?
          5.Results of testing missile defense, air defense on target? Well this is "breaking any existing missile defense", right?
          6. Well, etc.

          Aybolit, where are you going?
          Can you still give all the performance characteristics of Poseidon, Petrel and Relight? And you understand that much of what you scratched here no one will provide you, since your question is designed for the same narrow-minded people that you yourself are.
          I’ll tell you more, even when Vanguard is put on duty and this complex will go into the troops serially, and here you will repeat like Ass, that these are all bullshit and Putin’s games. I have only one question for you and people like you, why are you smoking and what kind of doorposts on your forehead do you fight all the way? Clown ... pah.
          1. -2
            27 December 2018 14: 31
            Quote: NEXUS
            what are you scratching here

            understandable ... i.e. You write, reason, and I (second-class person) - "scratch".
            Those. the difference between m / y "patriots nebratyami" and other riffraff, if you replace the riffraff with me, and "svidomo patriots" for you .. and not AT ALL?
            Quote: NEXUS
            Our question is designed for the same narrow-minded, which you yourself are.

            "narrow-minded like me"? Hmm ..
            - What are you measuring the width of my forehead?
            -Your arguments are "iron" of course
            Quote: NEXUS
            Can you still give all the performance characteristics of Poseidon, Petrel and Relight?

            - I asked TTX? = NO
            - I just asked for more weighty evidence on your oil / molasses, which you wrote above (well, as you always write, as much as the spray flies everywhere). just something like:


            Quote: NEXUS
            I have only one question for you and people like you

            what purpose are you interested in?
            Clown ... pah.

            sprays of saliva, I wrote above.
            1. +2
              27 December 2018 14: 35
              Quote: Aibolit
              - I asked TTX? = NO

              Wise guy, call the FSB, they will explain everything intelligibly and popularly to you. fool Sits on a fan scribble, Carlson.
              At the same time scribbling, knowing that no one would provide him such information. But we must also let the whisperer into an empty basin, for greater weight.
              You ask the mattresses for any data on secret developments, and I want to see how far and where they will send you. fool
              1. -2
                27 December 2018 15: 31
                Quote: NEXUS
                Wise guy, call the FSB, they will explain everything intelligibly and popularly to you

                1. Yes, be so kind as to hit you tea not to get used to?
                2. For a particularly deprived mind repeat: I did not ask for anything like that.
                And what they showed ... hmm. It’s not convincing me, sheep, maybe enough
                3. I won’t pedal, on those - frankly idiotic information / fantasies, which you gave out here with a bang
                Quote: NEXUS
                At the same time scribbling, knowing that no one would provide him such information.

                what is such a MA?
                Quote: Aibolit
                1. Telemetry with BB?
                2. Angle shooting of 0 with an UAV, let’s say) hit a given point on the polygon?
                3. The result of the impact of the BB (BS) "Vanguard" on the target target at the range?
                4. Plasma trace (satellite imagery, SARs)?
                5.Results of testing missile defense, air defense on target? Well this is "breaking any existing missile defense", right?
                6. Well, etc.

                What's so-so?
                Well, if you understand what I have written, what I doubt very much
                Quote: NEXUS
                You ask the mattresses for any data on secret developments, and I want to see how far and where they will send you.

                1. I frankly do not care about "mattresses", and they will not report back and convince me of something. I don't pay taxes to the US budget, and I'm not going to fight for them
                2. They provide, to deny this evidence is simply stupid
    5. +3
      26 December 2018 16: 21
      Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ??

      They write a collective petition to Soyuzmultfilm and personally to the General Director and Chairman of the Board of the Mosfilm film concern Karen Shakhnazarov demanding to immediately expose the shameless Kremlin propaganda about the Vanguard.
      wink
    6. +3
      26 December 2018 16: 21
      Quote: ANCIENT
      Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ???

      These, mainly in the "square" and "promised" settled. By the way, something "professor" has not been heard for a long time. I am worried if something happened to him? what I remember that he was eager to fight, he dreamed of rolling all Russian bases in Syria into a pancake ..
    7. 0
      26 December 2018 16: 41
      Yeah, they forgot to let down new manuals)))
    8. 0
      26 December 2018 16: 44
      Quote: ANCIENT
      Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ??? What will they howl now? ?

      Yes, a lot has been said about cartoons, although it is obvious that speaking with cartoons on a specific, narrow issue is a real shame, and GDP is not an eccentric autist.
      1. +2
        26 December 2018 18: 55
        There is still a sect that feels: connoisseurs. They know for sure that every single action of GDP is sent clearly from where and for the sake of it is clear to whom.
        Here's another bun, and their luggage is the launch of Avangard.
    9. +4
      26 December 2018 18: 43
      Young people! Set-off test test! P o rzhents auuuu !!!
    10. 0
      27 December 2018 10: 55
      Vanguard and Poseidon is not SOI for you.
    11. +1
      27 December 2018 12: 08
      Yes, here they are: https://el-murid.livejournal.com/4006312.html on other resources they write and still do not believe request
      Or here https://army-news.ru/2018/12/proizveden-uspeshnyj-pusk-rakety-kompleksa-avangard/ with a link to the same idiot
      1. 0
        28 December 2018 05: 27
        So that coprophile "el-murid" does not always believe even their pans, despite his mental disability. The whole army-news.ru has long been dirtiedsmile.
  2. +14
    26 December 2018 15: 00
    Good news...
    1. +7
      26 December 2018 15: 25
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      Good news...

      There people celebrate Christmas, but here it is ...
      1. +7
        26 December 2018 16: 07
        Quote: figvam
        There people celebrate Christmas, but here it is ...

        There already noted. Today, just the second day with a hangover, and here it is ... wassat
        1. +1
          26 December 2018 18: 57
          Well, here they have a jug of brine ...
          good: drinks
    2. +3
      26 December 2018 15: 52
      Quote: Igor Borisov_2
      Good news...

      Yes, for a long time there was no fresh news about the Vanguard.
  3. +9
    26 December 2018 15: 00
    serial production of the Avangard complexes has already been concluded

    It’s time to start dismantling NATO missile defense systems in Europe, since there’s no point in it in a couple of years.
    1. +2
      26 December 2018 15: 14
      Since there will be no sense in it in a couple of years.
      Reply

      Yeah, of course, the meaning is unchanged - it cut the money of European partners on NATO by the US corporations.
    2. +1
      26 December 2018 16: 06
      The main thing is that they would understand this .... laughing
    3. +2
      26 December 2018 20: 13
      Quote: tatarin_ru
      It’s time to start dismantling NATO missile defense systems in Europe, since there’s no point in it in a couple of years.

      However fast you are !!! belay
      And about the double appointment of UPV forgotten completely or something?
      They will thrust them into the Mk41 state-owned GBI or some new BRSMD thread and we will have a headache ... It will obviously not be possible to do without proactive "surgical intervention"! Yes
      That's what pshekov birdhouse should be sick of, and not about how to add apples on the cheap! fool
      AHA.
      1. 0
        27 December 2018 05: 15
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        And about the double appointment of UPV forgotten completely or something?
        They will put in the Mk41 the state GBI or some new thread of the BRMD and there will be a bunt for us.

        Alexander, I share my concerns - they can shove them. But not GBI, a missile with more than twice as long and two and a half times larger diameter.
  4. +5
    26 December 2018 15: 01
    Fine. Fine. More Vanguards and Armat to the god Armat. Most worried about the Su-57. I hope that even after the start of deliveries of the engine, the 2 stages will begin to rivet them at full capacity
    1. +1
      26 December 2018 20: 17
      Quote: Hypersound
      I hope, at least after the start of deliveries of the 2 engine, the stages will start to be riveted

      Will not start. Above ROFAR hung ...
      And even after Syria, the avionics are making adjustments ... They want to teach the mob of drones to control the network in a centric mess ...
      (info from OBS).
      1. 0
        26 December 2018 21: 32
        Rofar - is, as I understand it, the combination of AFAR with optics? Interesting hybrid

        As for controlling the aircraft with a swarm of drones, this is already a feature in general of the 6th generation (ROFAR too?)

        Yes, actually, and the engine of the second stage is also the next generation jerk. The afterburner supersonic is also provided by the current

        It turns out that in mass they want to build the Su-57, when it becomes not just 5, but 5+ or even 5 ++ generation
        1. -8
          27 December 2018 01: 53
          taking into account that there is no AFAR, then there is nothing to combine.
          so, to cut money under this business.
          1. +2
            27 December 2018 01: 55
            Quote: Avior
            given that there is no AFARA

            More?
            1. -4
              27 December 2018 02: 08
              how can one learn more about what is not? what
              If you are talking about this mythical Rofar, then this is supposedly such an optical way to control the transceiver modules of the AFAR, in which an increased radiation power is achieved.
              Why mythical? Yes, because there is not a single working light in nature, and whether there will even be at least some big question. The developers about it are not such garbage as in the Soviet textbook on social studies about communism was.
              a set of common words flavored with science-like terminology.
              And already loudly declare that he will be an airborne radar.
  5. +5
    26 December 2018 15: 01
    And they didn’t say which rocket they launched the block.
    1. +8
      26 December 2018 15: 06
      "Stylet"
      1. +18
        26 December 2018 15: 17
        Quote: Hypersound
        "Stylet"

        ... "Neighbors" adjusted for debts, on occasion (32 pcs.):

        13 Apr 2018
        1. +4
          26 December 2018 15: 30
          Quote: san4es
          ... "Neighbors" adjusted, on occasion (32 pcs.):



          Thank you!

          how my heart felt good ....


          1. +3
            26 December 2018 15: 35
            Good what good drinks
            1. +2
              26 December 2018 15: 55
              Quote: san4es
              Good what good drinks


              drinks
    2. HAM
      +3
      26 December 2018 15: 07
      You need to contact "NI", they will clarify ... hi
  6. +14
    26 December 2018 15: 02
    The launch of a missile of the Avangard complex with a hypersonic gliding winged warhead was carried out by a combat crew of the Strategic Missile Forces from the Dombarovskiy position area on a conditional target at the Kura training ground in the Kamchatka Territory


    So that's what blew the hill on the Far East =)
    1. +4
      26 December 2018 15: 02
      The most curious thing is that after all this, Avangard continued its flight and at any cost still hit the target in the Kamchatka Territory)
      1. +2
        26 December 2018 15: 29
        Quote: Hypersound
        after all this, Avangard continued its flight and at any cost still hit the target in the Kamchatka Territory)

        That's what booking means. smile
    2. SOF
      +8
      26 December 2018 15: 04
      Quote: Hypersound
      So that's what blew the hill on the Far East =)

      laughing ... otherwise all: "meteorite ... meteorite ..." good
      1. -28
        26 December 2018 15: 08
        In Chelyabinsk, 5 years ago, there was also a warhead. True, I do not know which and why it was with combat nuclear content o__O. About 500ct! Residents were lucky that the explosion took place at an altitude of about 20km
        1. +13
          26 December 2018 15: 15

          In Chelyabinsk, 5 years ago, there was also a warhead. True, I do not know which and why it was with combat nuclear content o__O. About 500ct!

          And then Ostap suffered ...
        2. +8
          26 December 2018 15: 21
          Quote: Hypersound
          In Chelyabinsk, 5 years ago, there was also a warhead. True, I do not know which and why it was with combat nuclear content o__O. About 500ct! Residents were lucky that the explosion took place at an altitude of about 20km

          Like flies here and there
          Rumors roam the corners .. (V.S. Vysotsky)
        3. +4
          26 December 2018 15: 28
          "There was also a warhead in Chelyabinsk 5 years ago." - Probably hit you in the head.
        4. -3
          26 December 2018 15: 49
          fellow lucky not residents, but stspratas
        5. -1
          26 December 2018 16: 52
          This earth has hit the Earth’s axis.)
      2. 0
        26 December 2018 19: 01
        Wasn't he "Chelyabinsk"?
  7. +10
    26 December 2018 15: 02
    With an initiative! We are waiting for all the fans.
    1. +6
      26 December 2018 15: 07
      Quote: Konst
      We are waiting for all the fans.

      They will not come. They will read, they will grit their teeth, but komenty will not write.
  8. +4
    26 December 2018 15: 03
    Good news! now there would be more "Vanguard"
    1. 0
      27 December 2018 00: 21
      Quote: pro000007
      more "Vanguard"

      While there are 32 ready-made media. In the package, the fly did not sit. Yes Above Sanchez attached a video with the story.
  9. +9
    26 December 2018 15: 05
    New Year Greetings USA. From Russia with warm greetings!))
    1. +4
      26 December 2018 15: 08
      Quote: seregin-s1
      New Year Greetings USA. From Russia with warm greetings!))

      New series from "Bond" .. With love from Russia ...
  10. +13
    26 December 2018 15: 09
    Where is the restless "all nonsense", "yes it is drawn", "dummy", "animation"? Scream louder laughing great news.
    1. +7
      26 December 2018 15: 38
      Quote: stalki
      Where are the restless "all nonsense" here,

      Here they sit on the site
      Quote: stalki
      Shout louder great news.

      No, cons in hatred from hate wassat
    2. 0
      26 December 2018 15: 54
      The main thing is to quickly "change shoes" from article to article from "Liberals, headed by Putin, everything is about. Rally", to praise Putin - "He showed everyone that Russia is strong."
  11. +6
    26 December 2018 15: 15
    A wonderful gift for the New Year, thanks comrades defense.
    1. +1
      26 December 2018 19: 04
      The creators of "Avangard" took the exam, by the way. According to Putin.
  12. +3
    26 December 2018 15: 18
    I am sure this is not the last gift for the New Year. Another 5 days. Yes
  13. +3
    26 December 2018 15: 26
    Saving, well, comments :)))))
    Quote: ANCIENT
    Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ???

    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Oh cartoon flew

    Quote: 210ox
    Where is the sect !?

    Quote: NEXUS
    Now they will howl that this is all fake and that this cannot be

    Quote: Konst
    We are waiting for all the fans.

    Gentlemen, well, I just can not with you :))))
    But still, I remind you that Vanguard practically none of the "all-propals", as you call them a fake, announced. It said that this development (an ICBM warhead flying not along a ballistic trajectory) is not some kind of new weapon, since it was implemented at the Bulava.
    It was said that the Vanguard is not the promised hypersonic weapon (warhead ICBMs have been hypersonic since the middle of the last century) and that this is not so that a completely new development.
    1. +9
      26 December 2018 15: 41
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      But still, I remind you that Vanguard practically none of the "all-propals", as you call them a fake, announced.

      Nude nude. The first went to change shoes ..... the second went .... the third went. How many of you ?
      1. +5
        26 December 2018 16: 28
        The first went to change shoes ..... the second went .... the third went. How many of you ?

        he just has a few pairs of slippers at home, you can quickly throw.
        the rest are still confused, some in Velcro, some in shoelaces
        smile
      2. +1
        26 December 2018 16: 31
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Nude nude. The first went to change shoes .....

        No, Sanya, change your shoes while you are - distorting the words of your opponents.
    2. +9
      26 December 2018 15: 47
      Vanguard, almost none of the "all-propals", as you call them a fake, announced

      Andrew! What are you? Sudden sclerosis? Link to you?
      Well, let's not forget: it’s fresher and in the comments TO YOUR SAME ARTICLE
      "How many warships does Russia need? The opinion of professionals." "Cherry Nine" is precisely in relation to the Vanguard that he used the word cartoon.
      1. -1
        26 December 2018 16: 35
        Quote: bk316
        Andrew! What are you? Sudden sclerosis? Link to you?

        And let's :))))
        Quote: bk316
        Well, let's not forget: it’s fresher and in the comments TO YOUR SAME ARTICLE
        "How many warships does Russia need? The opinion of professionals." "Cherry Nine" is precisely in relation to the Vanguard that he used the word cartoon.

        We clarify how
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        Frontier. And do not confuse the Vanguard, which flew - the usual long-range ballistic missile / short-range ICBM - and hypersonic maneuvering crap from the cartoon.

        и
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        Quote: bk316
        nuclear weapons delivery vehicles not intercepted by modern missile defense systems.

        Cartoons.

        That is, the nine (and he must be said to be very close to the extreme case of universal propalism) called the cartoon not Avagard, but that the latter could not be intercepted by modern missile defense systems
        1. +3
          26 December 2018 19: 26
          That is, the nine (and he must be said to be very close to the extreme case of universal propalism) called the cartoon not Avagard, but that the latter could not be intercepted by modern missile defense systems

          That is, the "cartoon" is not a video sequence about new combat equipment, but the idea contained in this cartoon about the impossibility of intercepting this very equipment? Forgive Andrey, but for me this is too deep, for me so horseradish radish is not sweeter:
          The Ministry of Defense released an informational material in which it was said that in the near future the Russian Federation will have a variant of combat equipment for ICBMs, maneuvering after separation in the course and pitch within wide limits and therefore inaccessible to the US NMD. MO illustrated this material with an animated presentation. It is this combat equipment that the all-fighters called "cartoon", trying to say that the object described in this informational material does not physically exist and will not enter service. This was substantiated in dozens of comments with anything from the backwardness of the RF military-industrial complex to the fundamental impossibility of making such maneuvers. Today, the Ministry of Defense showed the launch of an ICBM with this equipment. All point. This is precisely what Romanov was ironic about.
          If you expand the topic of cartoons and all-mutters, in my opinion then ALL the surprises of GDP (except for the petrel) exist in the metal and will soon really go into service, the questions are only in specific performance characteristics. You can completely not believe it, but disbelief is a sin, and in this case it is also a sin of stupidity .....
          A missile with a clean nuclear engine is somewhat separate, but the GDP did not claim that the missile was about to enter service, it was said about a successful test of the engine. This is surprising for me, because it unambiguously speaks of the creation of a COMPLETE supercompact nuclear reactor. Yes, we in this area are really ahead of the rest, but sooner or later we would have done such a thing, but ANYTHING didn’t slip even a hint that work is underway on the practical creation (not modeling — that was all) of such a device. Given the dual purpose and enormous commercial value of such an invention, I do not really believe in secrecy.
          Something like that.
          1. -1
            27 December 2018 02: 00
            In the near future, the Russian Federation will be armed with the option of military equipment for ICBMs maneuvering after separation at a wide rate and pitch and therefore inaccessible to US NMD

            Today, Moscow Region showed the launch of ICBMs with this equipment.

            questions only in specific performance characteristics

            in-in. questions just in TTX.
            No one doubts the existence of maneuvering warheads of ICBMs. They exist for a long time.
            but with TTX there are a lot of questions.
            And they showed only the launch, in which this ICBM is no different from the others.
            Do you understand?
            1. +1
              27 December 2018 16: 29
              Do you understand?

              I understand that.
              Do you want real telemetry and surveillance tools to be shown to you?
              DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WANT?
              SORRY WITHOUT BRAIN OR PROVOCATOR?

              Turn on the brain for a second. Someone once published similar data on the Voivode or at least on some ICBMs in service. But no one doubts their availability and everyone uses official information about the possibilities. HERE IN WHAT DIFFERENCE? What is your logic? In a burning desire not to admit what happened?
              1. -1
                28 December 2018 01: 00
                SORRY WITHOUT BRAIN OR PROVOCATOR?

                No, I’m just with brains, not a provocateur, and not even a boor.
                precisely because I'm with brains, I ask myself the questions that I raised above.
                And since it’s not a boor, I calmly explain this to you without insults.
                so do you understand?
    3. -3
      26 December 2018 16: 06
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      Saving, well, comments :)))))
      Quote: ANCIENT
      Where is the sect of "cartoonists" ???

      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Oh cartoon flew

      Quote: 210ox
      Where is the sect !?

      Quote: NEXUS
      Now they will howl that this is all fake and that this cannot be

      Quote: Konst
      We are waiting for all the fans.

      Gentlemen, well, I just can not with you :))))
      But still, I remind you that Vanguard practically none of the "all-propals", as you call them a fake, announced. It said that this development (an ICBM warhead flying not along a ballistic trajectory) is not some kind of new weapon, since it was implemented at the Bulava.
      It was said that the Vanguard is not the promised hypersonic weapon (warhead ICBMs have been hypersonic since the middle of the last century) and that this is not so that a completely new development.

      Well, Andrey, hang on now, everyone who personally saw how Vanguard plans to start eating you with a small meal and apparently me.
      1. +5
        26 December 2018 16: 23
        Do not worry about Andrei, he’s strong.
        But seriously, of all the "surprises of the GDP", it was the Vanguard that was developed so much and was not particularly secret that only completely stubborn or officer's daughters could write about a cartoon.
        The question about the medium remained some intrigue, but apparently the issue was resolved, the Sarmatians decided not to wait. It is logical because it was on the stylet that the vanguard was tested.
        And the most important question is whether he can accept target designations after separation (just do not write "this can not be" - undignified). But I'm afraid we will find out about it after it has been removed from service, and before that only the adversary and this knowledge would not bring him joy ...
        1. +5
          26 December 2018 16: 36
          Quote: bk316
          But seriously, of all the "surprises of the GDP", it was the Vanguard that was developed so much and was not particularly secret that only completely stubborn or officer's daughters could write about a cartoon.

          Agree
  14. -19
    26 December 2018 15: 36
    what is the news about, that the combat blogs of ballistic missiles in the final section fly on Gipzvuk, but are there really such blocks of ballistic missiles that did not go in hypersound ???
    Any warhead of Ballistic missiles flies to HYPERSONIC !!!
    1. +16
      26 December 2018 15: 49
      Oh canned!
      The thing is that he maneuvers at a course of 3000 km. belay And kinetically, interception becomes impossible from the word at all.
      And you did not know? Or out of despair? Then it’s better to be silent ....
    2. +5
      26 December 2018 16: 17
      For the gifted and those in the tank -
      During the flight at hypersonic speed, the planning winged unit completed vertical and horizontal controlled maneuvering and at the appointed time struck a conventional target on the battlefield of the range
      1. -14
        26 December 2018 16: 33
        it is difficult to probably live without brains then ???
        1. +1
          26 December 2018 19: 42
          To you, as a master on this issue, they will definitely turn to - "Combat blog"
        2. +4
          26 December 2018 21: 58
          Quote: Е2 - Е4
          it is difficult to probably live without brains then ???

          Of course it is difficult!
          But you somehow live !!!
          1. -3
            27 December 2018 10: 35
            I explain for the SPECIALLY GIFTED. In the USA as early as 1975, the Pershing 1 "hypersonic gliding warheads" were installed on the Trident-2, as well as such systems !!! More than 50 years have passed, I congratulate you on "SUCCESS"
            1. +1
              27 December 2018 17: 33
              I explain for ESPECIALLY GIFTED.

              So all the same, about the lack of a brain, it was to myself ......
              Pershing 2 were put on Trident 1? Riding a rocket on a rocket?
              Okay, I'm kind today, we will assume that we just missed "on"

              Back to our gifted rams.
              What type of RGC was on Trident-1 (UGM-96)? Right MIRV!
              (Catch the link:
              http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-96.html
              Sorry that in English, google to help.)
              Not MMRV but MIRV Karl !!!
              Americans generally like buses, so even MIRV is so-so.
              What does this mean young man?
              It is correct that the BB there were UNMANAGED. belay
              And they fell (did not fly but KARL fell !!!) in ballistic.
              Of course in hypersound. You may not know if you are gifted, but everything that falls from orbit is hypersonic even a stone and by the way plans like an iron, for example. wassat

              It is clear how it differs from what was launched by us?
              Actually this is the first full-fledged MARV or MMRV.
              The "partners" do not have any MMRV at all, so that the "no analogs" are in full growth ....
              1. -1
                28 December 2018 01: 10
                homing heads stood on Pershing, that is, they were maneuvering by definition.
                on Trident 1 there was a separable warhead with 6 individual guidance units — maneuvering there was an autonomous breeding unit. its presence also did not allow us to predict the flight path of warheads along the well-known launch path.
              2. -1
                28 December 2018 13: 25
                Mk. 500 Evader Maneuvering Warhead
                The start of the development of maneuvering combat units in the United States was laid in the late 60s. Unlike conventional warheads completing a flight along a ballistic trajectory, Evader is able to perform hypersonic maneuvers in the atmospheric portion of the flight, which would effectively resist the enemy’s missile defense. In the development of which the main requirement was the ability to perform anti-ballistic missile manners, while accuracy was not critical. However, further tests showed that the loss of accuracy compared to the base warhead was quite acceptable, and moreover, subsequent studies suggested a way to use a maneuvering warhead to significantly improve accuracy when, upon reaching the target, the warhead began to dive vertically downward, thereby eliminating the scatter created by the difference in the rate of charge detonation.

                MaVR Evader was one of the most advanced test programs conducted by Lockheed in conjunction with General Electric. All six tests (March 6, May 9, August 22, September 10, 1975, and January 23, 1976) performed at the Vandenberg Air Force Base using Minuteman and Trident I as accelerators were considered successful. As a result of the tests, the possibility of implementing a maneuvering combat unit was demonstrated, control and guidance systems were worked out, compatibility with the Trident I system was worked out
                THIS is in 1975. 50 years have passed !!! Keep jumping
    3. +8
      26 December 2018 16: 34
      "Battle blogs"
      Is this something from social networks? laughing
      classmates, in contact, twitter, facebook ...?
      winked
  15. 0
    26 December 2018 15: 42
    Good, good, but what's the point ?!
    Yes, they don’t believe there that ours will work for them, they don’t believe!
    Only the Yankees are afraid, I think, and even not so much, they are sitting behind the Puddle and have already arranged the matter so that the unbelievers will be the first to be handed out, but it may not even reach them!
  16. +7
    26 December 2018 15: 45
    Good evening! As for the cartoons: I live 200 x km from the launch, I saw it myself.
    Unfortunately there is no vidos - 27 with us.
    But let the sectarians wail
  17. +1
    26 December 2018 15: 46
    It’s strange why I didn’t see anything, the windows seem to be in the direction of Dombarovka, although the distance is 90-100 kilometers. Sorry, but I wanted to boast. laughing fellow
    1. 0
      26 December 2018 17: 39
      Here right now for this they will fill the minuses! They saw everything on TV, but he wasn’t seen ...
    2. +1
      26 December 2018 18: 59
      I accidentally saw this is fate)) fellow good
  18. +3
    26 December 2018 15: 50
    fellow Good!
  19. +3
    26 December 2018 15: 59
    We are waiting for analysts from the "partners".
    1. +2
      26 December 2018 16: 10
      Well, NI think the other day, and in the background of this, no headline will make
  20. +3
    26 December 2018 16: 03
    With the initiative of all of us men! The vanguard is the future of Russia's strike weapons and, accordingly, the Domokles sword over all our enemies, primarily the United States.
  21. +2
    26 December 2018 16: 08
    Go smile

    ..............
  22. 0
    26 December 2018 16: 20
    I’m thinking, but from Dombrovsky to the residence Poroshenko will get it (without a warhead), spot him, have time to hit the road.
    As I understand it, the block is planning, the rocket displays it along its trajectory into space, there it makes a turn to Kiev, to visit.
    1. 0
      26 December 2018 17: 47
      Quote: demos1111
      (without warhead)

      with a concrete alien lol
    2. 0
      26 December 2018 18: 57
      Not Dombrovsky, but Dombarovsky is the village of Yasny
      1. 0
        27 December 2018 09: 46
        Well, if absolutely right, then CATO.
        1. 0
          27 December 2018 17: 45
          I agree, sorry.
          1. 0
            27 December 2018 17: 47
            You can even add - Komarovsky. laughing hi
            1. 0
              27 December 2018 17: 51
              And you do not get sick, land)) hi
              1. 0
                27 December 2018 18: 01
                drinks drinks A similar wish. drinks
  23. 0
    26 December 2018 17: 05
    And yet, a poplar rocket and how many Vanguards to partners it can throw?
    1. -2
      26 December 2018 19: 45
      One - judging by the size and weight of the M. Poplar.
  24. +1
    26 December 2018 18: 02
    What a bastard! We would have warned you in advance, indicating the time of arrival. Yap blazed (I have the opportunity since childhood, but all the time by accident). The imperialists, over there, take care of their people: "Would you like to blink at the Falcon? Then, in so much, turn the boss in that direction." And all business, two lines, no additional costs, satisfied citizens go home.
  25. 0
    26 December 2018 19: 02
    Christmas fireworks for our partners. smile
  26. +1
    26 December 2018 19: 36
    Hooray! It happened! Honor and glory to scientists, designers, developers, engineers, workers and our rocketeers! We can when we want! I have the honor!soldier
  27. +1
    26 December 2018 20: 57
    Yap spotted

    Shame laughing

    1. -1
      27 December 2018 07: 38
      I meant the final stage of the flight. And with their own eyes, and not "through the eyes of Senkevich." And so - this is one vegetable cartoons.
  28. -3
    26 December 2018 21: 18
    As soon as the striped ones really realize that they cannot oppose anything, and that having said "A", they simply will not have time to say "B", relations between the United States and Moscow will begin to warm until the situation changes, and if God forbid this happens as if Gorbachev and Yeltsin, then they will no longer hesitate and will destroy us at the first opportunity.
    1. -1
      27 December 2018 08: 04
      Watchmaker, do they need to answer? They have 450 "minutemans", there are a few thousand warheads on "tridents" on boats, but we have no missile defense system and will not be (because it is expensive and useless against thousands of warheads). Why would they heap huge amounts of money?
      I (IMHO) have the impression that we ourselves entered the arms race and we are burning money to fine-tune products created in the 80s and sent to the closet as unnecessary at that time. There are no other problems in the army and navy and in the state as a whole, apparently
      1. -1
        28 December 2018 05: 47
        The mattress mats have only miserable crumbs left from the strategic nuclear forces, they are defenseless. Of the 400 Minutemans, at least 50% will not reach the minimum at all due to "anomalies", as always happens, out of 14 "Ohio" on the move at best 8, the rest are in perpetual overhauls. Each of the remaining eight at the moment is not capable of launching more than two Tridents in a salvo, then either the loss of the boat or go to the dock, the last 4-time they had a quarter of a century ago, and the last two-time a year ago with an interval of 4 (!) Hours - it can be seen they were afraid to screw up again, because in 2011 and 2016 there were already unsuccessful launches.
        So Russia is completely dominant in terms of strategic nuclear forces over Matrasia, and missile defense, in contrast to the assault Amer, is available, A-135, on the approach of S-500 and A-235.
        1. 0
          28 December 2018 11: 47
          Quote: Sarmat Sanych
          Yes, unlike missile defense amerovsky missile defense is available, A-135, on the approach of S-500 and A-235.
          Lazh American shoots real target missiles, A-135 \ 235 shoots only conditional virtual targets
          1. 0
            28 December 2018 16: 22
            Quote: Mimoprohodil
            A-135 \ 235 knocks down only conditional virtual targets

            Cupid knocks down goals are not virtual, dear. You should at least study the topic before writing such nonsense. A-135 has a nuclear warhead. fool
            1. 0
              28 December 2018 16: 51
              Quote: NEXUS

              Cupid knocks down goals are not virtual, dear. You should at least study the topic before writing such nonsense.
              We open the news about each missile launch and see this:
              "The new anti-missile missile defense system after a series of tests has reliably confirmed the inherent characteristics and successfully completed the task, hitting a conditional target with a given accuracy, "said Andrey Prikhodko, deputy commander of the anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense of the Aerospace Forces,
              1. -1
                28 December 2018 16: 54
                Quote: Mimoprohodil
                We open the news about each missile launch and see this:
                "New anti-missile missile defense system

                Amur A-135 is a new rocket? It opens the news ... fool
                1. 0
                  28 December 2018 17: 31
                  Catch the tests not of a new rocket in 2007, which means from A-135 http://old.redstar.ru/2007/10/12_10/1_01.html
                  As the Information and Public Relations Service of the Space Forces told Interfax-AVN, launch was carried out on conditional purpose
                  Since 1983, this is the 42nd launch of this type of missile.
  29. 0
    26 December 2018 21: 35
    Here I would like to add something else: "The leader ... gave instructions" to conduct maneuvers more intensively ... "He made his statement during the major exercises of mixed military units held in the country, number ........
    ... the leader also called on the army leadership to "end the formal and stereotypical approach to conducting exercises in order to ensure readiness for the most severe and difficult war."
    The Supreme Commander-in-Chief noted the importance of interaction of all types of troops "to ensure speed, surprise and coordination of actions of their units and subunits, including special forces." He also gave instructions to modernize the military equipment in service.
    ... the leader, .... expressed confidence that the units ... would meet ..... "new achievements in increasing combat readiness and the level of combat training."
    soldier
  30. +2
    26 December 2018 23: 53
    During the flight at hypersonic speed, the planning winged unit completed vertical and horizontal controlled maneuvering and at the appointed time struck a conventional target on the battlefield of the range
    Well, the materialization of "cartoons" has occurred.
    A good New Year present ... for our overseas partners and their friends, European and Middle Eastern. bully
  31. +1
    27 December 2018 00: 34
    bk316 creating a COMPLETE ultracompact nuclear reactor

    A nuclear engine is immediately an association with a reactor .... Oh, how many wonderful discoveries are preparing for us .. our military-industrial complex ... In 2016 they talked about a prototype of a nuclear battery, at the end of November this year they were certified (a document was issued confirming the declared characteristics of the product, its quality and safety), the main element is nickel-63. "It is fundamentally important that <...> this is already the industrial development of a product for which passport characteristics have been obtained. This is a set of complex high-tech technologies that only the Russian Federation possesses today," said Petr Gavrilov, General Director of the MCC (https://tass.ru/ ekonomika / 5830503). Could have done something like that ...
  32. +1
    27 December 2018 02: 22
    ... as the president said at a meeting of Russian senators that Russia was the first in the world to find a NEW strategic weapon ... tremble, enemies angry
  33. -2
    27 December 2018 07: 52
    Good news, but ... the rocket is "Voevoda", if I am not mistaken, or its next modernization (I am mistaken - correct). Nothing new.
    And why is this hypersonic block needed if not a single missile defense now and then reflects a volley of our entire arsenal? And even if hypothetically able, will someone want to check in practice? If 20% reaches, then this is the end anyway.
    So, thinking out loud, specialists know better. It's just that the same surface fleet is more likely dead than alive, astronautics is dead. Yes, and in "civilian" problems are immeasurable.
    1. 0
      27 December 2018 21: 30
      By analogy with the famous phrase "With the help of a colt and a kind word, more can be achieved than from one kind word" - against "Vanguard + other nuclear arsenal" Anglo-Saxons will be less comfortable planning an attack on Russia. For they are not just waiting for the GUARANTEED destruction, but destruction in the SQUARE. Of course, heaven will also be waiting for us ... but they are guaranteed hell. Will the elite of Western billionaires want to self-destruct ... I doubt it. And therefore - you see, we will live in the world for another 30-40 years.
  34. -1
    27 December 2018 08: 17
    Of course, I’m sure of the real existence of Vanguard, but for me (and even more so for adversary specialists) the staff is not convincing. They showed the start of the rocket. So what? The rocket is ordinary. Such starts are shown almost monthly. The whole point is in the war block. And his hit on target was not shown from the word at all. Hence the question, was there a block?
    Flimsy video.
    1. +1
      27 December 2018 10: 57
      Quote: Old Tankman
      So what? The rocket is ordinary.

      Carrier of the Vanguard, UR-100Н (Stiletto). So that you understand why this particular rocket, it has had only 3 in its entire history! failed launch. This is the most reliable ICBM in the world. 28 of such missiles, the Russian Federation took in 2000's for debts from Ukraine, so to speak from a warehouse (in oil), that is, new ones. It is these missiles that will become the first carriers of the Vanguard. ICBM Stiletto itself is unique in its performance characteristics.
      Quote: Old Tankman
      The whole point is in the war block. And his hit on target was not shown from the word at all.

      I’ll remind you the history of Almaty T-14, SU-57, etc. ... The appearance of Almaty was hidden until the Parade, and the SU-57 dimensions are still known only for approximate purposes and to this day journalists are forbidden to remove it. This is called SECRET. Flight Vanguard not shown? And how do you imagine shooting this flight at hyper speed do not tell?
  35. +3
    27 December 2018 10: 28
    I think, to all (normal people) it dawned on what the manuals were brought up to?
    "Oh, did not show telemetry", "Oh, normal launch of the carrier", "Oh, did not show the trajectory", "Oh, did not show a hit"
    As one famous character said: "Maybe you also have the keys to the apartment where the money is? Get out of here, defective!"
  36. -3
    27 December 2018 10: 36
    I explain for SPECIALLY GIFTED. In the USA as early as 1975, the Pershing 1 "hypersonic gliding warheads" were installed on the Trident-2, as well as such systems !!! More than 50 years have passed, I congratulate you on "SUCCESS" Now think if you have something to think about ... what happened over these 50 years in this area in the USA
    1. +2
      27 December 2018 11: 00
      Quote: Е2 - Е4
      I explain for the SPECIALLY GIVEN

      Question to the wiseacre, were the Trident blocks capable of maneuvering at hyper speeds? 50 years have passed ... fool
      1. -2
        27 December 2018 11: 14
        all blocks are flying in HYPERSONIC, but for you only Russian blocks are capable of this. Continue to jump about UNAWNED ANALOGUES IN THE WORLD
        1. +2
          27 December 2018 11: 21
          Quote: Е2 - Е4
          all blocks are flying in HYPERSONIC, but for you only Russian blocks are capable of this. Continue to jump about UNAWNED ANALOGUES IN THE WORLD

          I repeat for such people like you Trident blocks MANEUVERING? What are you turning around like a louse in a frying pan, wise guy?
  37. -1
    27 December 2018 10: 57
    Launch, launch ... And why the hell show launch ... Normal launch, an ordinary mine ICBM. Now, if they showed the final stage of this "launch", then yes ... Again we will secret it from ourselves. The "partners" still have it filmed from satellites. After all, before each ICBM launch, we warn each other and the site of the test site is also known. Everything is like in the USSR ... But why ...?
  38. 0
    27 December 2018 11: 20
    This is unexpected and joyful news. Turnip "yy" began to scratch for sure. And Russia will live in peace for ten years. As I understand it, no other country possesses such a powerful and fast weapon.
  39. 0
    27 December 2018 11: 45
    Quote: Hammerlock
    The Russian Ministry of Defense reported that given successful pusto the missile of the Avangard complex is the last

    This is the end of the paintwork. Then in a series and putting into service. Standard procedure..
  40. 0
    27 December 2018 11: 46
    Quote: FRoman1984
    Good news, but ... the rocket is "Voevoda", if I am not mistaken, or its next modernization (I am mistaken - correct). Nothing new.
    And why is this hypersonic block needed if not a single missile defense now and then reflects a volley of our entire arsenal? And even if hypothetically able, will someone want to check in practice? If 20% reaches, then this is the end anyway.
    So, thinking out loud, specialists know better. It's just that the same surface fleet is more likely dead than alive, astronautics is dead. Yes, and in "civilian" problems are immeasurable.

    This is Ur-100 or its modification ...
  41. +1
    27 December 2018 14: 23
    It's funny to watch mutual curtsies. Ukraine has once again made an appeal for a "crusade" against Russia, in Russia everyone was reminded of Neptune and the vanguard.
  42. -1
    27 December 2018 15: 57
    Quote: bulvas
    a couple of dozen of these "cartoons" and we will have no one to sell rocket engines ...

    the most interesting thing is that CNN will not even have time to report it

    On the parallel branch about the Sarmat test, Hypersound rebuffs, citing as an example the stories of American experts that one Voevoda missile can destroy the state of Texas or a country the size of France. Now you are two dozen "Vanguards" with a rumored capacity of 2 Mt. are going to destroy America ...

    Quote: NEXUS
    Frankly, bad news for the United States and England.

    Hardly, Andrey! This is a good way for them to whine about increasing the military budget. As for the Avangards, they will not make many of them, and in the overall nuclear missile balance they do not make the difference.

    Quote: NEXUS
    Can you still give all the performance characteristics of Poseidon, Petrel and Relight? And you understand that much of what you scratched here no one will provide you, since your question is designed for the same narrow-minded people that you yourself are.

    Points 2, 3 and 4 can easily be shown ... There is no secret in showing these positions. And as for the same "Poseidon", we can say where the bloopers are in the information presented to us. Well, the performance characteristics of "Sarmat" are not very difficult to calculate at all ...

    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    They shove in the Mk41 shtatovskie GBI or some thread new BRSMD and we will be a bunt ...

    They will not stick it, Alexander. Would you be able to load a rocket (the same GBI) of almost 6,5 meters and a diameter of about 7 m into a cell with a length of 0,6-17 meters and a diameter of 1,8? I think that only with the help of a hammer, a chisel and some kind of mother. No other way. laughing Not a single ballistic missile (at least existing, at least promising) will simply fit into such a cell ... Otherwise, from a ballistic missile who gets into it, it will fly 100-200 kilometers no more

    Quote: Sergey39
    And they didn’t say which rocket they launched the block.

    UR-100N UTTH (15A35) missile, or rather its modernized version 15A71.

    Quote: san4es
    .. "Neighbors" adjusted for debts, on occasion (32 pcs.):

    Well, from these 32 there were already tears. In fact, only 12 units were deployed in the positional areas of two regiments of the 13th division

    Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
    And then Ostap suffered ...

    And how it happened.

    Quote: Paranoid50
    While there are 32 ready-made media. In the package, the fly did not sit. yes Above Sanchez attached a video with the story.

    What are you talking about. Are there still 32? As they received from Ukraine in 2003-2004, they kept them in storehouses. And those who were shot in the UBP did not change, and for the "roars" they did not use ... But why is our native Ministry of Defense going to deploy only 12 such items ???

    Quote: bk316
    The Ministry of Defense released information material saying that in the near future the Russian Federation will be armed with a variant of combat equipment for ICBMs maneuvering after separation by course and pitch over a wide range and therefore not available to the US NMD.

    Honestly, sometimes MO is cunning. Speaking about the capabilities of this product, it (MO) extends these capabilities to all phases of flight. And the fact that at a certain stage the block is really a problem for the missile defense system does not mean at all that this combat equipment is unbreakable. At a certain stage - two, in total - no. As there is no impenetrable air defense. It all depends on the outfit of forces involved in a particular situation.

    Quote: Avior
    No one doubts the existence of maneuvering warheads of ICBMs. They exist for a long time.

    But at the same time they are not in service. Individual guidance (RGCH IN / MIRV) maneuvering, individual guidance (MARV) is only now becoming a real weapon. Although work has been going on for more than 3 decades.

    Quote: Е2 - Е4
    what is the news about, that the combat blogs of ballistic missiles in the final section fly on Gipzvuk, but are there really such blocks of ballistic missiles that did not go in hypersound ???
    Any warhead of Ballistic missiles flies to HYPERSONIC!!!

    Not any. This applies mainly to missiles with a range of more than 300 km EMNIP, for missiles with a shorter range, the speed of the blocks was not always hypersonic

    Quote: bk316
    The thing is that he maneuvers at a course of 3000 km.

    And if it's not a secret, where does such information come from? honestly I can’t imagine what such a block should be in order to be able to deviate from the course of 3000 km ...

    Quote: Е2 - Е4
    I explain for the SPECIALLY GIFTED. In the USA as early as 1975, the Pershing 1 "hypersonic gliding warheads" were installed on the Trident-2, as well as such systems !!! More than 50 years have passed, I congratulate you on "SUCCESS"

    Do not write nonsense. You have written so many absurdities in three lines that your hair stands on end.

    Let's start with the fact that in 1975 a contract for the creation of the Pershing-2 rocket was only signed. This is the first. Second... On "Pershing-2" was not a maneuvering, but a controlled unit [/ b] W-85 [b]. And these, as they say in Odessa, are two big differences. The third ... This hypersonic gliding unit could not stand on the Trident-1 due to the fact that the Trident-1 was put into service in 1979 year. And the fourth . On "Trident-1"as later on "Trident-2" there was a block W-76 / Mk-4And not W-85 as on "Pershing-2". All blocks removed from the Pershing-2 were used to create new modifications of the B-61 bombs. In short. For knowledge of the topic, you NEUD

    Quote: demos1111
    And yet, a poplar rocket and how many Vanguards to partners it can throw?

    0 units. Dimensions are not the same.

    Quote: FRoman1984
    Good news, but ... the rocket is "Voevoda", if I am not mistaken, or its next modernization (I am mistaken - correct). Nothing new.

    The rocket is not a Voevoda. This is an experimental launch vehicle based on the UR-100N UTTKh (15A35) ICBM, known in the west as the SS-19 or Stiletto. After modernization, the rocket received the index 15А35-71 or 15А71, or 15Ю71

    Quote: NEXUS
    Carrier of the Vanguard, UR-100N (Stiletto).

    The carrier, Andrei, is actually based on the UR-100N UTTX. The UR-100N missiles have long been out of service ..

    Quote: NEXUS
    So that you understand why this particular rocket, in its entire history there were only 3! failed launch. This is the most reliable ICBM in the world.

    This is not the reason. More precisely, not only in this. The missile, judging by indirect data (based on the exchange of data on START-3), is no longer in service in the form of a conventional ICBM. EMNIP those that were in service in the three regiments of the Tatishchev division are now listed as not deployed. But the "Sukhi" received from Ukraine must be put somewhere - so it was decided to deploy it on them. The solution is palliative, but it is currently a viable option. It is like that titmouse in the hands while the crane ("Sarmat") is still in the sky.

    Quote: NEXUS
    It is these missiles that will become the first carriers of the Vanguard. ICBM Stiletto itself is unique in its performance characteristics.

    What is the uniqueness of the performance characteristics?
  43. -2
    27 December 2018 21: 46
    good news, cheers Russia well, etc, etc ...... however tired of posturing and super duper the leadership of a respected guarantor of the Constitution .... make people such agitation .... it would be better to deal with internal problems .. (raised the age for retirees now ... distraction drives through all channels)
    The rating goes down and it pretends to be a show .... tired of it ... probably it’s time for him to leave ---- it’s a pity that there’s no one to change it and the boom of putting up with our guarantor is enough patience !!
    1. 0
      2 January 2019 07: 27
      I agree.
      It would be better if the problem of poverty were addressed, 20 million people in the 2nd quarter of 2018.