Criminal prosecution of a Baltic Fleet naval aviation pilot terminated

74
The criminal prosecution of the pilot of the Russian Aerospace Forces - Senior Lieutenant Sergei Nefyodov ended. Recall that a criminal case against a marine pilot aviation Of the Baltic fleet It was instituted last year in connection with the damage to the Su-27P aircraft during the approach. It was the senior lieutenant Nefyodov who was flying the plane at that moment.

Criminal prosecution of a Baltic Fleet naval aviation pilot terminated




The cause of the damage to the fighter, as the investigation found out, was the erroneous switching by the pilot of the landing gear control system to the position in which the front post was removed - at a speed of about 250 km / h. As a result, the "Drying", on which the planned training flight was carried out, swept the nose of the runway. The pilot himself was not injured.

On termination of the criminal prosecution of the pilot, his mother Olga Nefedova told the media. According to her, which are given edition "Moscow Komsomol"The termination of the prosecution took place after the personal petition of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, Sergei Shoigu. Officially, the defense ministry has not yet confirmed the request from its head.

Previously, many colleagues of Sergei Nefyodov asked the investigation to stop the prosecution of the serviceman, noting that the mistake was accidental and there was no malicious intent in it.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    24 December 2018 16: 01
    let the "accusers" show the class.
    1. +47
      24 December 2018 16: 27
      Yes earlier would have cost "three salaries" - and business is over. They beat cars before, and into the trash. And there have always been erroneous actions. Where did the criminal offense come from? Have you gone crazy?
      1. +4
        24 December 2018 16: 33
        Quote: dauria
        And always erroneous actions were and will be.

        That's why they are training flights. But the investigation must be conducted so that the trainer fixes the material. In the end, there was a pike in the lake so that the gudgeon did not doze off ... Well, that ended well.
        1. +4
          24 December 2018 23: 26
          But the investigation must be conducted so that the trainer fixes the material.

          I will disappoint you, but the investigation is not for this, but in order to understand the causes and circumstances of what happened.
          1. 0
            24 December 2018 23: 44
            Quote: alexmach
            ..disappointing, but the investigation is not for this, but in order to understand the causes and circumstances of what happened.

            An investigation is being conducted to sort out, and not to appoint a guilty party. In history, we are looking for darkness of examples ..., just darkness. It is simply not clever to kill people for nothing. Now the groups in the parade are driven by a pilot who, when he was a passenger, damaged a plane on landing and didn’t harm God, thank God.
          2. +1
            26 December 2018 00: 49
            You do not know our result. It is carried out in order to punish someone, and not necessarily the culprit. Now the meteorite will fall, and someone will be appointed vinvl
            1. 0
              26 December 2018 15: 32
              Quote: aiden
              Now the meteorite will fall, and someone will be appointed vinvl

              Yes, there’s a meteorite in the Far East that demolished a mountain, blocked the river, in the air defense, the repression will begin laughing
      2. +13
        24 December 2018 16: 34
        Quote: dauria
        Where did the crime come from? Are you crazy?

        From the "military prosecutor's office" or "SK", everyone wants an extra "stick"
        1. +6
          24 December 2018 19: 37
          Quote: svp67
          From the "military prosecutor's office" or "SK",

          I wonder if you ask these procurators what a "chassis" is - will they be able to answer?
          1. +3
            24 December 2018 19: 46
            Quote: Piramidon
            I wonder if you ask these procurators what a "chassis" is - will they be able to answer?

            For that they perfectly pronounce and know the meaning of the word "jurisprudence"
            1. +4
              24 December 2018 19: 56
              Quote: svp67
              For that they perfectly pronounce and know the meaning of the word "jurisprudence"

              Claudia did not break in law? laughing
          2. +2
            24 December 2018 21: 49
            Quote: Piramidon
            Quote: svp67
            From the "military prosecutor's office" or "SK",

            I wonder if you ask these procurators what a "chassis" is - will they be able to answer?

            Of course they will be able to answer - they say - a rack with a wheel. But if they are checked with partiality for their "mistakes", they will probably find more than one, and not only in compliance with the procedural code.
      3. +6
        24 December 2018 16: 39
        And this is a new trend ... and everywhere
        1. +4
          24 December 2018 17: 15
          Quote: Sibiryak 66
          And this is a new trend ... and everywhere

          What is he new ...
          This mechanism is regularly activated - in France at the end of the eighteenth century, and in our country in the thirties of the twentieth, and in the States in the fifties - if there is an opportunity to earn money or make a career on someone else’s blood, there are always those who want to use it.
      4. +7
        24 December 2018 16: 48
        Quote: dauria
        And always erroneous actions were and will be.

        The "human factor" is not going anywhere. Well, starting a criminal case is a clear overkill. How crazy do you need to be to consciously (or intentionally) create this?
        1. +2
          24 December 2018 17: 00
          Quote: helmi8
          How crazy is it to be in order to consciously (or intentionally) do this?

          He is not a suicide, after all.
          1. +4
            24 December 2018 17: 02
            Quote: novobranets
            He is not a suicide, after all.

            I’m talking about this ...
            1. +4
              24 December 2018 17: 10
              Quote: helmi8
              I’m talking about this ...

              And me too. It is clear that the pilot should receive a disciplinary sanction, nevertheless, the materiel is damaged through his fault. But the criminal case, in my opinion, is simply stupid. What malicious intent can be here if the pilot himself could die.
        2. 0
          29 December 2018 02: 00
          Dear, this is not too much. This is our law, it is impossible under the law to conduct expert examinations and interrogate people outside the framework of a criminal case! It is impossible. And here is a decision on a criminal case ... Here you can already talk about 37 and 38 years!
      5. +1
        24 December 2018 16: 50
        Quote: dauria
        Where did the crime come from? Are you crazy?

        Good news, otherwise it was just a nightmare. The saddest thing is everywhere. Whoever did this will not be punished. Complete lawlessness and impunity in the country - this is why the mess is. All through the fifth point, while Putin or Shoigu personally will not fit in. Madhouse.
        They also want to raise aviation, report on new aircraft. Just what are they for show, if there are no pilots. The old will run away from this outrage, the new will not go. fool
      6. 0
        24 December 2018 21: 11
        And no one has yet canceled the stick system.
      7. 0
        24 December 2018 22: 54
        The amount of damage, the subjective side - most likely saw criminal negligence. A careless form of guilt, there was no intent, but criminal negligence (according to the investigation) was.
      8. 0
        24 December 2018 23: 34
        Quote: dauria
        Yes earlier would have cost "three salaries" - and business is over. They beat cars before, and into the trash. And there have always been erroneous actions. Where did the criminal offense come from? Have you gone crazy?

        From where from?
        And where to get "enemies of the people"?
      9. 0
        25 December 2018 04: 26
        If there was no deliberate damage to property, then ugovalka is too much. Reprimand, re-confirmation of qualifications
  2. +7
    24 December 2018 16: 03
    Anything can happen. On the one hand, state-owned expensive equipment, machinery. On the other hand, randomness is kind of like. On the third hand, the principle of punishment so that everyone is careful afterwards. On the other hand, often the transcendental struggle for the survivability of cars and tragedy ... A person dies, which is already a tragedy, and a specialist in whom the state has invested.
    1. +5
      24 December 2018 16: 32
      Yes, it happens that the guy made a mistake, he stayed alive, I remember how during the exercises the soldier under the beter made a fire and the car burned out like a wrecker, and if he dribbled deeper, he was ordered by the elder to warm Carter's pallets in the cold, there was no blowtorch, the car burned out and who the kid is to blame, the cast which is also the kid but older or the one who did not provide blowtorches frost.
  3. +8
    24 December 2018 16: 10
    The termination of the criminal prosecution occurred after a personal request of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Sergey Shoigu

    and without Shoigu in any way?
  4. +8
    24 December 2018 16: 11
    Probably the pilot got all the brains out. The one who does nothing is not mistaken ...
  5. 0
    24 December 2018 16: 14
    Previously, many colleagues of Sergei Nefyodov asked the investigation to stop the prosecution of the serviceman, noting that the mistake was accidental and there was no malicious intent in it.
    ------------------------------------
    The human factor has not been canceled by anyone, everything happens, the main thing is that it didn’t die. What evil intent can there be at all if a pilot can die as a result of an error.
  6. 0
    24 December 2018 16: 16
    I believe that the initiation of a criminal case is a standard procedure in such accidents. An investigation is underway in the framework of the excited angle. cases precisely on the FACT OF THE ACCIDENT. The versions of possible sabotage, pilot errors, etc. are being investigated. And since it was found that this was only a pilot's mistake, and not a "cut hydraulic line", for example, the investigator concludes that there is no corpus delicti and the case is closed for lack of corpus delicti. And the journalists in the article turned everything inside out. And they showed the situation so that, as it were, the pilot was almost condemned ... Eh For the red father, they will not regret their father either ...
    1. +4
      24 December 2018 16: 59
      You can count anything.
      But where does the initiation of the case, if it sentenced to two years conditionally with payments to state-wu 27 mil rubles. Moreover, the plane was flying in a month.
      1. +3
        24 December 2018 17: 16
        I was not aware of this incident. And it is not clear from the text of the article that he has already been convicted. On the contrary, it is written: "Let us remind you that a criminal case against the pilot of the Baltic Fleet naval aviation was initiated last year." The words that the pilot had not found a conviction already ... The Losers wrote an article ... And what does it mean to stop the criminal prosecution? Moreover, if he has already been convicted. Amnestied, rehabilitated, revised / canceled the sentence due to newly discovered circumstances, was the cassation complaint taken into account by a higher judicial body? And how is it possible that they asked for and stopped persecuting the convict? Kindergarten in pants with straps ...
        But it pleases that the person is now not convicted of a criminal court!
    2. +5
      24 December 2018 17: 29
      Quote: Alexander X
      I believe that initiating a criminal case is a standard procedure for such accidents.

      Indeed, criminal proceedings are instituted in such cases. Sergei Nefedov was charged under Art. 351 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Violation of flight rules and preparation for them” (case number 1-3 / 2018 (1-131 / 2017;)
      From the materials of the case: ".... 2 seconds after the main wheels touched the runway at the end of the precision landing strip, the pilot lowered the nose wheel. After 1 second of run on three wheels the pilot erroneously, inadvertently instead of pressing the parachute release button, set the landing gear crane switch to the retracted position. "
      Nefedov S.A. He was found guilty and convicted of violating flight rules, resulting in negligence and other serious consequences (violation of clause 31 of the Federal Aviation Rules for flying state aviation, clause 4.3.6. Guidelines for the flight operation of Su-27). The Kaliningrad Garrison Military Court (1st instance) sentenced him to 2 years probation. This sentence was quashed by the Baltic Fleet Military Court (appeal). So think about whether they condemned him or not.
      R.S. Nevertheless, there are publicly available sentences (GAS Justice to help).
      1. +6
        24 December 2018 17: 37
        Well, now everything is clear: an appeal was filed with the naval military court (the standard action of the convict’s lawyer, in case the defendant is convicted). He (naval military court) quashed the verdict of the court of first instance. If the correspondent wrote everything this way, and not with the Chinese code, then this discussion would not have happened ... Thanks for the link. In this case, he himself would not begin to search for court materials on the Internet.
        ****************
        I did not have time to write words about the cassation, as I had a lot of advertisements on my computer with the offer of the services of lawyers. Big brother takes care of us continuouslyfellow
        1. +5
          24 December 2018 18: 33
          So that's the point. The incident occurred in May last year, in 2017. A man was cheated until February of this year, where he was sentenced to 2 years probation and 27 million rubles. Although the planes \ tanks, etc. fall \ fight always and everywhere, and will continue to fall \ fight. Without this, it’s life. You will not teach a person anything unless you teach him. Then in March the court of second instance sent the case for further investigation after the appeal.
          During this time, people were in shock, not only him, but also everyone who understands the situation. They were going to hold pickets there (it wasn’t aware of \ no), and they wrote letters. The newspapers reported that the commander of the naval aviation himself had filed a motion to dismiss the case and he ... was rejected.
          Right now, Shoigu intervened and, like a man, was saved. In manual mode!
          But now let's think about whether he will be able to defend the country, whether he will want to, especially how the "country" has treated him? How will other young guys react to this situation? What part of them will change their minds and we will miss pilots, mechanics, etc.? After all, everything is new and expensive. Who wants to owe so much money as they will never see in their entire life? Or even go to jail? There are not enough personnel, and so there will be even fewer of them.
          In my opinion, this is a direct threat to the country's defense, these irresponsible people should not only be removed from work forever, but also open an appropriate case under the relevant article. Only who will do it? Nothing will change. Well, at least the guy did. That’s the thing here.

          Big brother takes care of us continuously

          Scary to live wassat In general, we have nothing to hide)
          1. +2
            24 December 2018 18: 55
            Yes, unfair court decisions undermine faith not only in the judicial system, but also in the state itself ... I agree to 1000%. I think that this officer will not serve further in the RA. And how much money the state spent on its preparation! Of course, this is an undermining of defense. What military prosecutors and judges were only thinking of when passing a guilty verdict ...
          2. 0
            25 December 2018 03: 26
            Quote: DarkMatter
            In general, we have nothing to hide)

            Hmmm .... well, maybe a bottle of brandy from my wife .... recourse
        2. 0
          24 December 2018 23: 08
          Quote: Alexander X
          I did not have time to write words about the cassation, as I had a lot of advertisements on my computer with the offer of the services of lawyers.

          These are also "flowers" ... Yes "Berries" twig when these advertisements come out after ... talking about the subject of interest (there are already a lot of similar cases). wassat There is no longer a "brother", but a complete "dad" looks after.fellow laughing
      2. 0
        24 December 2018 19: 38
        Canceled by the court of appeal? or all the same, if the intervention of Shoigu. then the cancellation of the sentence in a higher court or a pardon, but it is up to the President, but to restore the service? Repeal of sentence, in whole or in part? or a new investigation in a new composition?
    3. +3
      24 December 2018 21: 08
      Quote: Alexander X
      I believe that initiating a criminal case is a standard procedure for such accidents.

      Nothing like this. In Soviet times, aviation was an order of magnitude larger and, accordingly, there were many similar flight accidents and prerequisites for them. But in order to accuse the pilot of a deliberate flight accident during landing with the landing gear removed, they couldn’t think of that then. And never in such cases have any criminal cases been opened. Responsibility, as a rule, was limited to disciplinary measures up to writing off from the flight.
      This example once again shows what senility the current law enforcement system has reached. They do not have enough strength or desire for swindlers in power (including those with big stars on shoulder straps), and they will completely bite this pilot.
    4. +1
      24 December 2018 22: 57
      The case is not closed for lack of composition, it is not instituted. First by checking the materials. If excited, and it turns out the lack of composition - the investigator lathers his ass.
  7. +2
    24 December 2018 16: 18
    And what was the military prosecutor's office trying to impute to him? That the pilot deliberately went to cause damage? What is it like? Understanding what the drying nose can lead to "scratching on concrete", I decided to check? Are they smart friends there?
    1. +1
      24 December 2018 19: 16
      They sewed criminal negligence. The most common article from prosecutors regarding the military.
  8. 0
    24 December 2018 16: 27
    A pilot's mistake in operation is always painful, especially for colleagues. Is such an opportunity justified? It is difficult to express ourselves unambiguously, because the demandingness of commanders for operational errors on the ground is much higher. But in any case, once the court has decided, there is the truth. With the upcoming colleagues, aviators.
  9. 0
    24 December 2018 16: 38
    It’s good that they didn’t begin to cheat a person further - we can break our career, or life can easily.
    1. 0
      24 December 2018 17: 09
      The guy was just lucky! Shoigu is most likely not doing business here. I don’t know about his career ...
  10. lot
    +1
    24 December 2018 16: 50
    What happens if you break a combat fighter
    https://varlamov.ru/3221215.html
  11. +5
    24 December 2018 16: 56
    I have already written in another thread about the appeal of AVVAKUL veterans (among the signatories are very, very respected people, professionals, such as Honored Pilot of Russia, Major General Viktor Fisul). Here is what veterans write in their letter:

    ““ For us it has always been and is an axiom that an error must be perceived as a normal component of any system in which a person and technology interact ... What is the pilot's fault? For 22 hours of flight in five years?»
    The last phrase was crippled. But this is not written Sobchachka a couple with Navalny. The names and merits of the authors of the appeal are very easy to verify. But:
    "For 22 hours of flight in five years?"
    1. +3
      24 December 2018 17: 12
      Well, I think 22 hours after all, not in 5 years, but in three. For with such a raid as a lieutenant could leave the school. If you count five years, then for the one who got the title of starling after the incident, it turns out that over the past two courses at the school, Sergey flew in less than 20 hours. If this is true, then a handful of people should be judged, starting from the head of the school and his deputy for flight training (releasing a cadet without a raid is a crime), ending with the commanders in part (this is how to plan work so that such a raid was in part). Most likely looking at this and hushed up the case, and the case received quite wide publicity.
      1. 0
        24 December 2018 18: 02
        That's the way it is, but why should General Fisulu lie in an appeal that was done quite publicly? A micro-raid hours may depend on a host of other factors, and not just on the failure of the school’s leadership and part command. Such factors are known to you for sure better than me.
        1. +1
          24 December 2018 18: 13
          22 hours on the Su-27. But not all.
          1. 0
            24 December 2018 23: 04
            Substantial amendment (without jokes and jerking). However, even in this scenario: 22 hours for 5 years. This is 4 hours 24 minutes per year. What gives 22 minutes per month. Well, further sharing is not even funny.
          2. 0
            25 December 2018 17: 54
            Quote: Ryazanets87
            22 hours on the Su-27. But not all.

            Even so, then there can be no talk of a mastered type, which means that there can be no talk of access to independent flights.
            Quote: Wizzzard
            A micro-flight hours may depend on a host of other factors, and not just on the gouging of the leadership of the school and the command of the unit.
            The admission to an independent flight of an unflown lieutenant with a scanty raid is the top of command professionalism. Although, maybe they just had no one to put in a cup at all and it was just dictated by severe necessity?
      2. 0
        24 December 2018 18: 05
        Well, I think 22 hours are not for 5 years, but for three

        Well, not for 5, for 3 - and this figure does not drive into a stupor?
    2. +1
      24 December 2018 21: 17
      Clarification: Honored Pilot of Russia Major General Victor FisuN
      1. 0
        24 December 2018 22: 58
        A typo. Who hurt - please forgive. Separately, an apology to General V. Fisun.
  12. +1
    24 December 2018 17: 13
    The control system must be changed so that such situations do not occur: landing lock, voice notification, flashing light with a siren ....
  13. +7
    24 December 2018 17: 14
    Here it would be worth noting that this error became generally possible due to a designer's mistake that was prescribed to be fixed back in 2004, but this was not done. So basically the blame was blamed on the young pilot for all those responsible for this, made extreme.

    Moreover, on aircraft modification Su-27P, this, as it turned out, is generally considered a system error. She is promoted by one serious ergonomic drawback of the cabin. Test pilots demanded that the designers eliminate it while testing the machine. They wrote: Lock the landing gear crane when the plane is already on the ground.

    This drawback was listed in the first stage of development work, noted in the test report, approved by the Air Force Commander-in-Chief on November 19, 2004, but was not eliminated.

    That is, it is a matter of the fact that aircraft designers placed control levers in the cockpit without taking into account possible human behavioral reactions, thereby not creating reliable protection against accidental cleaning of the landing gear of an airplane that has already landed on a runway.

    Case materials. Expert assessment of the ergonomics of the cockpit of the Su-27P (the document was signed by seven senior test pilots in the rank from major to colonel):

    “During state joint tests of the aircraft ... with the flight personnel of military unit 15650, the following ergonomic drawback of the cockpit was revealed: there is no blocking of landing gear cleaning on the ground.

    ... Levers, the incorrect or accidental inclusion of which can lead to an emergency, must be highlighted in shape, color, have a safety device and, if necessary, must be removed from the dashboard from the general row.

    Conclusion: the lack of locking the landing gear on the ground on a Su-27P aircraft is an ergonomic flaw and a violation of the requirements of paragraph 4.6.1 of OTT VVS-86, book 1, part 2, which can lead to unintentional landing gear landing on the ground. ”
    1. t-4
      +1
      24 December 2018 18: 53
      Your explanation is certainly qualified. However, a number of questions arise.
      - Su-27P adopted for service in 1990, in operation since 1985. Why only after almost 20 years of operation appeared "List of the first stage of development work" noted in the test report approved by the Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force on November 19, 2004when the old Su-27 was already thinking about what to do in retirement.
      - Why only SU-27P? And other modifications - the Su-27S, and of course the combat training Su-27UB, later ending with the Su-35S. Is there a lock on the landing gear? In general, is she standing somewhere? Is it on the Tu-160?
  14. +2
    24 December 2018 17: 22
    I'm shocked, really the country of the absurd, in my opinion, military prosecutors and a judge must be disqualified and driven from the army into the national economy with retention of the costs of the criminal case and the trial, plus the payment of moral damage to Nefedov hi
    1. -4
      25 December 2018 04: 22
      If you squint at work, do you get bonuses ???
      1. 0
        25 December 2018 10: 13
        No, of course, having experience in managing a specialized motor transport company, he dealt with every accident from and to, but did not bring the punishment to such an absurdity.
  15. +1
    24 December 2018 17: 27
    Remember the Meeting Places cannot be changed, 5 series "Was there no intent here, not a terrorist attack!
  16. 0
    24 December 2018 18: 35
    frankly, in the 21st century, protection against such errors should be the default
  17. ZVS
    0
    24 December 2018 19: 38
    Prudence finally prevailed!
  18. 0
    24 December 2018 20: 00
    Maybe I didn’t understand something, like the chassis is always removed synchronously and the bow rack and the main ones are also available. Maybe someone knows the essence of the issue?
    1. 0
      25 December 2018 18: 05
      Quote: Ros 56
      Maybe I didn’t understand something, like the chassis is always removed synchronously and the bow rack and the main ones are also available. Maybe someone knows the essence of the issue?

      The racks under load cannot exit the locks, and the rear racks were already on the concrete
  19. -1
    24 December 2018 22: 28
    On the simulator let them train more ..
  20. +1
    25 December 2018 04: 19
    MISTAKES and who will pay ???
  21. 0
    25 December 2018 06: 46
    As they taught and received .. I won’t be surprised if a raid from him, unlike the CP or the ZKP, is several times less ... so as not to pay more ..
    1. 0
      26 December 2018 11: 34
      Quote: Angry 55
      As they taught and received .. I won’t be surprised if a raid from him, unlike the CP or the ZKP, is several times less ... so as not to pay more ..

      You need to start with the so-called reforms of higher military education, with the fact that the number of oldest and legendary schools with their specific thorough scientific school has been destroyed, upscale teachers and instructors have been dismissed, the system of training and education of cadets has been destroyed.
  22. 0
    26 December 2018 00: 02
    Personally witnessed a similar incident! In 1995, on a summer night, while taxiing to the parking lot, the Su-27ub pilot switched the landing gear crane (lever on the front dashboard) instead of turning off the taxi headlights (toggle switch on the left horizontal flap).
  23. 0
    26 December 2018 11: 25
    They’ve already become completely stupefied with idleness in organs, rightly, for mistakes and inexperience it’s easier and safer to hammer a person, completely discouraging him from all his desire to do what he loves and further creative initiative, instead of analyzing the error in detail and avoiding this later and by increasing flight hours and classes on the simulator. Indeed, to investigate real crimes, knowledge and creativity are required, it is hard, routine, long time hard labor, and it can be fraught with further career and life, it’s easier to hammer out and finish off an older one, quickly and revealingly and the bosses will stroke .
  24. 0
    26 December 2018 11: 27
    Quote: eleronn
    Personally witnessed a similar incident!

    If this is repeated or even possible, then this is the work of ergonomics, for designers, the question is purely technical, and not for special practitioners and prosecutors.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"