The cryptographic service of the Soviet Union. "Hellish machines." Part of 4

20
In the majority of specialized information sources, both in Russia and abroad, foreign electromechanical encoders are mentioned. In the USSR there are also considerable achievements in this field, but for certain reasons we know little about it. And there is something to tell about, especially since the case was not limited to encoders. So, the Special Technical Bureau (Ostechbureau), created in 1921, already three years after its founding, began the development of the first text-based electromechanical encoders. Originally conceived as a branch of the Moscow research institute-20, Ostechbyuro eventually became a major center of competence in the fields of mine, torpedo, scuba diving, communications, remote control, as well as parachute equipment. In particular, the novelties of control of radio-fuses using coded signals were presented. This breakthrough was accomplished in the 1925 year, and a year later the first remote control of the floating shells was obtained. As you can see, a topic similar to the current “Status-6” was laid back in pre-war time.

The cryptographic service of the Soviet Union. "Hellish machines." Part of 4




The head of the bureau, Vladimir Ivanovich Bekauri, in 1927 directly oversaw the development of the BEMI device (Bekauri and Mitkevich), which was designed to control landmine explosions at a distance of about 700 km using powerful broadcasting stations. In 1931, the first prototypes of disk encryptors appeared, and in 1936 the secret encryption equipment “Screen” was tested. For the interests of the Air Force in Ostekhbyuro developed a high-quality noise-resistant radio communications equipment "Emerald", which was equipped with long-range bombers and reconnaissance. Emeralds were also used to connect the Air Force headquarters with each other. However, the most famous were the projects of radio-controlled mines, tanks, torpedoes, aircraft, as well as further improving the theme of "BEMI." Such a technique during the war was a complete surprise for the German troops - for a long time they could not understand the causes of unexplained explosions deep behind their troops. Understanding came with new intelligence that described the new Russian engineering ammunition. Hitler’s secret order, which fell into the hands of Russian special services in December 1941, said:
“The Russian troops, retreating, are using“ hellish machines ”against the German army, the principle of action of which has not yet been determined, our intelligence set up special training radio engineers in the combat units of the Red Army. All chiefs of POW camps should review the composition of Russian prisoners in order to identify the specialists of this nomenclature. When detecting prisoners of war, radio special engineers-specialists of the latter are immediately transported to Berlin by plane. What to report on the team to me personally. "


One of the resonant applications of the new development was the 14 explosion of November 1941 of the year in the basement of the house №17 Dzerzhinsky in Kharkov 350-kilogram landmine. The signal to the radio-controlled mine F-10 was sent from the Voronezh Radio Broadcasting Station on 4.20 in the morning when the city commandant, Major General Georg von Braun, peacefully slept in his residence a few meters from a powerful mine. By the way, von Braun was close relatives of the famous German designer, who became very popular after the war in the United States. The Germans extracted several tons of such “gifts” from the basements of occupied Kiev. Most of the government buildings, theaters, the headquarters of the NKVD, Khreshchatyk and the Assumption Cathedral were mined. One of the Kiev workers pointed out to the invaders a Lenin Museum, from the basement of which German sappers extracted at least 1,5 tons of trinitrotoluene, which were supposed to lift the block to the air according to a coded radiogram. However, this only partially helped, and on September 24 of the year Kreshchatik and its surroundings soared. Mines detonated with a predetermined sequence, destroying the field commandant's office, gendarmerie, warehouses and a cinema. A month later, on October 1941, the radio bomb exploded in Odessa, which was occupied by Romanian troops, destroying the generals and officers of the 22 th Infantry Division of the 50 th Romanian Army under the rubble of the NKVD building before 10. The main goal was the division commander, General Ion Glogoganu, who was one of the many victims of this sabotage.




The control unit object mines F-10 without housing

A typical Soviet radiofugas was a box 40x38x28 cm, which was located explosive radio F-10 (the Germans called it Apparat F10), and the power of the charge could vary within wide limits. Each such tab was attached radio antenna length 30 meters, which is usually buried. This became the Achilles' heel of domestic development - the Germans simply dug a suspicious area from all sides with a ditch on 50-70 cm and often ran across a receiving antenna. It was powered by an eight-lamp radio receiver from a standard rechargeable battery, the capacity of which was usually enough to work in reception mode from 4 to 40 for 24 hours. In addition, the complete set of charge necessarily included a radio signal decoder “Device A”. The blasting control unit could be located both in the immediate vicinity of the charge, and at a distance of up to 50 meters, connected to the explosive by an electric-explosion line. Undermining such a tab could transmit equipment is not below the divisional level. One of these was the operational radio station PAT, which has an output power of one kilowatt and a range of up to 600 km. The company also provides a radio station RAO-KV with 400-500 W with a range of about 300 km, and the weakest RSB-F on 40-50 W with a range of up to 30 km. These radio stations operated in the 25-120 meters range (short and medium waves). The batteries of the battery lasted no more than four days of constant work - it affected a lot of losses on the intensity of the radio tubes. For this reason, a clock mechanism was introduced into the mine, which periodically turned off the power. In the operation mode, when 150 seconds mine is in a combat position, and 150 seconds are “resting”, the standby time is 20 days. In the 5 position (5 minutes of work and 5 minutes of rest), the life increases to the maximum possible 40 days. Naturally, taking into account the nature of the clockwork, the coded radio signal for an explosion should be given at least 1 minutes (continuous operation), 6 minutes (in the 150 mode of seconds) and 10 minutes (in the rhythm of 5 minutes on - 5 minutes). Mina F-10 could be set to self-explode from a time-delay fuse - on 10, 16, 35, 60 or even 120 days. For reliable operation of the charge, the instruction recommended installing 2-3 mines on the site immediately. On the blast initiation principle, the Finnish sapper Jukka Lineen wrote: “The blaster acts on the principle of three successively included tuning forks, which are made to vibrate with a triple audio signal (pause melodies of Kharkov and Minsk civil broadcasting stations were used)”. For the first time, the Red Army tested engineering munitions of the new 12 design on June 1942 of the year on the Northern Front, when the left of the village of Strugi Krasnye, Pskov Oblast, was undermined. Three mines of 250 kilograms of TNT were exploded at once in each - the signal of detonation was sent from a distance of 150 km.






The Germans endure the F-10 radio fights from the Kiev Museum to them. V.I. Lenin, 1941 year

At the end of 1941, the Germans, in their own skin, understood what they were dealing with, and organized a campaign to find and neutralize mines such as F-10. To begin with, important buildings in the occupied territory were tapped with special acoustic equipment Elektro-Akustik, which allowed to catch the ticking of the clock mechanism up to 6 meters. Also, the Germans got an instruction to the radio-mine, which made it possible to organize jamming by a sapper company consisting of 62 people who were armed with several 1,5-kilowatt transmitters and receivers. It is noteworthy that the typical trick of the Soviet special sappers, who worked with the F-10, was the installation of a conventional pressure mine on top of the radio tab. Obviously, this effectively eased the vigilance of the Germans - in Kharkov, from the 315 mines of the F-10 mines installed by the retreating Soviet units, the Germans were able to neutralize only the 37.




Radiofugas receiver and battery. The bottom photo shows the numbers 6909-XXXIV. Regarding the first "Arabic" number, there are no assumptions, but "Roman digitization", according to the Germans, means the conditional number of the length to which the mine is set. So, XXXIV can talk about the frequency 412,8-428,6 kilohertz. If the number on the box was larger than the XVIII, then this meant that the "hellish machine" was set up for special long-range control and was highly sensitive.

In the memoirs of the marshal of the engineering troops V. K. Kharchenko you can find the following words:
“Soviet-controlled mines caused the Nazis considerable losses. But it was not only that. The F-10 devices, along with conventional time-mines, created nervousness in the enemy’s camp and made it difficult to use and restore important objects. They forced the enemy to waste time so precious for our troops in the harsh summer and autumn of 1941. ”


Until 1943, the Red Army "nightmare" the rear of the invaders with radiomines, and their creator V.I. Bekauri did not live to see the triumph of his own brainchild - in 1938, he was shot on charges of spying for Germany. All charges were dropped only in 1956 year.

At the end of the story, it is worth quoting General Helmut Weidling about the domestic radiofugas, which were recorded in Berlin in May 1945: “We didn’t have the corresponding equipment, and as for the radiofas, your engineers were far ahead of ours ...”

Продолжение следует ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    22 December 2018 07: 18
    Cool. Radio war (in every sense) World War II, war in war
    1. +3
      22 December 2018 15: 03
      Yeah ....
      An article about cryptographic machines ...
      and what will be in an article titled, for example, "US Warships" ?? Cost of stockings on the Lokomotiv market?
    2. +1
      23 December 2018 21: 48
      The article undeservedly forgotten the name of Colonel Starinov. This is the first. Secondly, this is only one answer to those who without much understanding of the problems harass everything that was done by Tukhachevsky. The ideas laid down during his time as deputy Voroshilov yes, in many respects were ahead of their time, but many were not simply realized or shifted due to their breakdown in the 37-38th years. For example - radar, its development was sharply inhibited by the arrest of Oshchepkov. Ordeals with semiconductor technology, with the creation of domestic klystrons and magnetrons ... By the way, the creation of the Airborne Forces is also the merit of the dead Marshals. Read the memoirs of Colonel Starinov, Oshchepkov and many others.
      1. 0
        24 December 2018 12: 54
        Quote: LeonidL
        Secondly, this is only one answer to those who without much understanding of the problems harass everything that was done by Tukhachevsky.

        Especially this "achievement":
        The engineer who destroyed Marshal.
        Everyone knows about the sad fate of Marshal Tukhachevsky.
        Much less is known about who brought the marshal to such a sad end.
        This man was ... engineer Leonid Kurchevsky. The creator of the infamous dynamo-reactive cannons (DRP), also known as the "Kurchevsky cannon".

        https://katmoor.livejournal.com/150417.html
        1. 0
          25 December 2018 04: 27
          Brought to mind, these guns became recoilless anti-tank guns, which by the way were widespread earlier in all armies. Now they are less common, but LNG is still in service with many countries. For example, in Vietnam, a light tank was used on the tower of which six recoilless guns were installed. They could shoot not only anti-tank commutative ammunition, but also high-explosive fragmentation. Just an ingenious engineer a little ahead of time and fell under the press, and Marshall had the character of a keen child. Neither one nor the other is the reason for the execution. And there was nothing more serious in matters there.
          1. 0
            25 December 2018 13: 27
            Quote: LeonidL
            And there was nothing more serious in matters there.

            With the exception of one thing, it was precisely the mistakes in the planning of armament programs that Tukhachevsky was responsible for that were the reason that in 1941 we entered the war with a mass of backward equipment and armaments. So they shot him essentially for the cause - the initial period of the war cost us too much.
            1. +1
              26 December 2018 04: 49
              And with what weapons did Germany enter the war? How did the Wehrmacht tanks for the most part differ (in concept and version) from the tanks of the Red Army? The Germans fought a lot of junk - T-1, T-2, Czech T-35, T-38, but all this junk was radio-frequency and had excellent optics, excellent commander towers. Moreover, the Germans did not have such tanks as T-34, KV, and heavy monsters like T-35 and medium T-28 half monsters. BM-13 - the brainchild of Tukhachevsky, the aviation versions of Katyusha - too, the artillery of the Red Army (touched the time of Tukhachevsky) was superior to the German in everything .... except for traction and it went awry right up to 1943. The main point was that command personnel did not have the experience of operating large formations at the beginning of the war. On the one hand, repression played a role, and on the other, the explosive nature of army growth. Well, Pavlov and Kirponos, and the rest of the commanders of the fronts of military experience, could not have been. The maximum that Pavlov commanded is the division, and here is the front! Note that the arrival of professionals on the front — Tymoshenko, Zhukov, Budyonny, Voroshilov — which often does not stick out very much, led to less stabilization of the situation, to the resilience of the troops, to better control. it was the old cadres that were very long in the form of authorized Headquarters crutches for the new generation of generals. Therefore, I think that such professionals, and the Marshals of Victory spoke very well of them all later, like Tukhachevsky, Egorov, Yakir, Uborevich, Primakov, etc., under the difficult conditions of the first year, could find the best solutions for managing the fronts and armies. In addition, the new mechanized corps were skewed towards saturation with tanks to the detriment of the infantry, and even that always lagged behind the tanks, as did artillery. That is why the battle of Brody (border battle) ended so unhappily, there was no interaction with artillery, aviation, infantry, tanks ... Soviet military leaders became commanders in battles, but the Germans had already passed such a first-level school since the 39th year and their commanders had experience driving troops since the First World War. Yes, I agree that Tukhachevsky had unrealizable (or simply unrealized to the end) plans ahead of his time, but almost all of his achievements sooner or later went into operation. There was no need and no reason to shoot him and the rest of the commanders and military commanders, and it was simply indecent to enjoy this atrocity.
              1. -1
                26 December 2018 13: 11
                Quote: LeonidL
                And with what weapons did Germany enter the war? How did the Wehrmacht tanks for the most part differ (in concept and version) from the tanks of the Red Army?

                Well, at least by the fact that they were all radio-fired, some of which had two radio stations of different ranges. I don’t even speak about German optics - even German binoculars were considered a valuable trophy among our commanders.
                Quote: LeonidL
                In addition, the new mechanized corps were skewed towards saturation with tanks to the detriment of the infantry,

                Some of our light tanks made their way through German armor-piercing rifle cartridges. And what is the use of such tanks - ask Tukhachevsky?
                1. 0
                  27 December 2018 04: 37
                  German light tanks and armored vehicles of the first releases made their way with armor-piercing cartridges, but what does Tukhachevsky have to do with it? I wrote about radio and optics, or is it pleasant for you to repeat it without quoting? By the way, he wrote a long time ago in "Krasnaya Zvezda", but God bless him. It's not about the penetration of the "amphibious" tanks, but it's about them. There were very few such tanks in the Wehrmacht and they were not very reliable. Floating and underwater driving tanks, as you know, were used, for example, to cross the Bug. Another thing is that the Red Army, or rather not very professional commanders, threw these tanks, and T-26, BT-2-5-7 t T-34, KV, and armored vehicles in attacks on the German infantry saturated with anti-tank weapons in a general avalanche "... but without infantry and artillery support. This technique, especially amphibious tanks, was ineptly spent in the first weeks and months of the war, but according to Russian military historians, A. Isaev, for example, it would be very useful for crossing rivers during the "countdown". Light tanks with bulletproof armor are by no means an invention of Tukhachevsky - they are an invention of their time and they were in all armies of Europe, where Tukhachevsky was not. By the way, in border battles, the latest T-34 and KV tanks were also killed by the German anti-tank equipment. Moreover, many from the fire of infantry anti-tank equipment, grenades, mines and bottles with flammable liquid, the rest - most of all from air defense guns and large calibers of div art regiments. Read A. Isaev's books about the tank battle near Brody, everything is very clear and reasoned there. Good luck
                  1. -1
                    27 December 2018 13: 03
                    Quote: LeonidL
                    I wrote about radio and optics, or is it pleasant for you to repeat it without quoting? By the way, I wrote a long time ago in "Krasnaya Zvezda", but God bless him.

                    I learned about this not from newspapers, but from front-line soldiers who not only fought, but later became colonels in the General Staff. Believe me, they know more than you what really happened, the more so after the war one of them went to German factories for reparations.
                    Quote: LeonidL
                    It's not about the penetration of the "amphibious" tanks, but it's about them.

                    You can name the number of such tanks in our country and in the Wehrmacht in order to understand what material resources were spent on and what the effect was of them.
                    Quote: LeonidL
                    But according to Russian military historians, And Isaev, for example, it would be very useful for crossing rivers during the "countdown".

                    Isaev can not be considered an authority in the creation of military equipment, he is just a popularizer of history, and no more. So find more powerful authorities to confirm your conclusions.
                    1. 0
                      27 December 2018 22: 49
                      “I learned about this not from newspapers, but from front-line soldiers who not only fought, but later became colonels in the General Staff. Believe me, they know more than you what really happened, especially since one of them went to German factories after the war on questions of reparations. " ... You remind me a little of Rezun with your "arguments", for example, he wrote about a conversation in an English tavern with an old English boatswain, so he secretly told him that England supplied weapons to the USSR back in 1940. Talking to front-line soldiers is good, but ... alas, this is not proof. and in general, apparently, you are not a military man, you are superficially familiar with military history, therefore, my dear, I kicked you off to Isaev. I am a busy person and, excuse me, I do not intend to discuss this topic with you anymore, I have the honor. Happy New Year.
                      1. -1
                        28 December 2018 12: 39
                        Quote: LeonidL
                        Talking with the war veterans is good,

                        This is not only good, but also very useful, because you learn a lot from them that were not mentioned in official history. Especially if they were associated with weapons and equipment.
                        Quote: LeonidL
                        you are not a military man, I’m superficially familiar with military history, so I, my dear, have kicked Isaev to you.

                        I realized that you just have nothing to object to, and your journalistic articles did not impress me, even if you are a military man, then apparently not as professional as you think.
                        Quote: LeonidL
                        I’m a busy person and, excuse me, I don’t intend to discuss this topic with you anymore, I have the honor.

                        And what prompted a "busy person" to write on the forum, all the more to discuss a topic in which, as it turned out, you are not such a great specialist. However, you can consider yourself so ...
  2. +5
    22 December 2018 10: 31
    The subject of the Ostekhbyuro is certainly interesting, especially for me, who graduated from a university with a degree in Automation and Telemechanics. Here you are, liberals of all stripes and “backward Bolshevik Russia” ..
    1. -7
      22 December 2018 11: 30
      "Here you are, liberals of all stripes and" backward Bolshevik Russia "..

      No, she is "ahead of the rest of the planet", since she thought of inventors to shoot en masse ...
      1. 0
        23 December 2018 21: 51
        These are two sides of the same coin.
  3. +6
    22 December 2018 10: 46
    The article is interesting, fascinating, thanks to the author.
    There is a remark and addition.
    For the first time, the Red Army tested engineering munitions of the new 12 design in June 1941 on the Northern front, when the left of the village of Strugi Krasnye, Pskov region, was undermined. Three mines of 250 kilograms of TNT were exploded at once in each - the signal of detonation was sent from a distance of 150 km.

    After all, July, not June. smile
    According to some reports, the explosion killed about a hundred German tankers from 56 microns. The data raise doubts, since 56 microns at that time attacked Soltsy and its parts were near Porkhov, 60 km away. south of Strugov Red. We were preparing mentally, so to speak, to "shovel" from ours during the famous counterstrike, when Manstein, for the first time in the war, had to grease his heels with fat.
    In Strugi themselves at that time, there could be units of 6 td 41 mk. It seems that Rous (at that time the commander of one of the regiments of this division) in his memoirs, regarding this period, writes something about the attacks of the partisans. So that two days after the Germans occupied the territory of the region, partisans began to actively operate in it, I am tormented by some doubts. Maybe it never dawned on Routh that these were not partisans and that "partisan attacks" meant the explosions of radio mines in Strugi?
  4. +3
    22 December 2018 13: 02
    Very interesting article, thanks to the author. But in my opinion, the author somewhat shifts away from discussing the issue of cryptographic technology for communication organization, which is the main direction of development of these products, because Bilateral communication sessions are more vulnerable in terms of cryptographic strength than one-time commands to undermine.
  5. -8
    22 December 2018 14: 47
    Another agitation, albeit expertly presented.
  6. +2
    22 December 2018 16: 17
    I remember in the magazine "Technics-Youth" published somewhere in the 70s or early 80s there was a similar article about radio explosives.
  7. -1
    22 December 2018 16: 33
    A progressive technique, but applied forcefully and to some extent contributed to the Nazis. In terms of the destruction of these, everything is fine, but in terms of undermining the city center, it has greatly changed the mood of the population. It is what it is!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"