The Chinese Navy conducted flight tests of JL-3 ICBMs from the diesel-electric submarines

American edition of The Washington Free beacon reports the availability of information about the Chinese testing of an underwater-based intercontinental ballistic missile. We are talking about the tests of the ICL JL-3 (Juilan-3), which (tests) were the first flight for the missiles of the new modification in the PLA. The American mass media declares that such data are confirmed by the missile attack warning system.

This system determined some parameters of the ICBM flight tests for submarines. In particular, it was stated that the tests were conducted in the Bohai Bay (Bohaiwan) of the Yellow Sea in the last decade of November. The maximum depth in this bay is 39,8 m. The launch was carried out from a submarine (EPTL) "Type 032", which was also used in the tests of underwater ICBMs of the previous modification - JL-2.

In fact, this is a naval modification of the DF-31 (41) intercontinental rocket DF-XNUMX - ground-based.

In the United States, it is especially noted that the range of the third Juilan is such that it is enough to hit any target in the United States of America even if Chinese submarines launch from the internal Chinese waters - “in the event of an attack”.

It has been suggested that the range of the Chinese ICBM (SLBM) is about 14 thousand km. At the same time, the head of the JL-3 has 10 independent blocks with individual guidance, which practically reduces to zero the effectiveness of any existing missile defense system.

Comments

[Gray brother]

Mine in the wheelhouse, as I understand it.

[svp67]

Quote: Gray Brother

Mine in the wheelhouse, as I understand it.

So nothing new under the moon ...

Our submarines of the XNUMHAV project were the same.

[Gray brother]

Quote: svp67

Our submarines of the XNUMHAV project were the same.

The North Koreans and now are, well, well, at least not a guide rises from the body.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: svp67

Our submarines of the XNUMHAV project were the same.

So the 629A was also "the same". But the English "sirs" and the English sea lords were really afraid of them, comparing them to a loaded pistol at the temple of the United Kingdom. After the disbandment of 16 DKBF DKBF, they breathed a sigh of relief.
Few people know, and yet on the basis of 629 were created to test new SLBMs:
629B (D-4 / P-21), 601 (D-9 / P-29), 605 (D-5 / P-27 and P-27К) and 619 (D-9 / Р-39) projects. So, the glorious 629 constellation has given a start in life to almost all sea ICBM complexes!

[Tutu]

This is type 032 (http://k.sina.com.cn/article_6440260514_17fde93a2001003aqb.html)

[GKS 2111]

enough to hit any target in the United States
Good news!!!

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Especially do not rejoice, China can hit us with these missiles with the same success, and unlike the United States, China has territorial claims against Russia, although they are not officially voiced.

[spektr9]

Especially do not rejoice, China can hit us with these missiles with the same success, and unlike the United States, China has territorial claims against Russia, although they are not officially voiced.

I'm afraid to upset you very hard, but it is for this reason that China once in Russia will not strike ...

[svp67]

Quote: GKS 2111

Good news!!!

So they cover everything on ours ....

[jonht]

That's just long-range missiles for us from China, complete garbage, for us from China medium-range missiles. And big is immediately the height of the PN output, and therefore the detection and time of the BB coming to the target will be greater. And I didn’t hear that the Chinese would do BB breeding on a flat trajectory, yes they have a ballistic one.

[Sarmat Sanych]

The only thing that Washington Free Beacon did not mention is the ridiculous throwing weight (less than 200 ct) and the fact that the carrier will be ready very soon (the most lagging moment in China). Therefore, according to tradition, placing on a database among Chinese people will happen ... it is not known when, JL-2 in general brought to mind 40 years, under fifty designers and military during this time shot.
But Russia and the Union gave them so much for nothing in the field of nuclear weapons, at current prices of hundreds of billions of dollars of technology, personnel and equipment - nevertheless, they did not feed the horse. All the strategic nuclear forces of the PRC exist only thanks to our help and have not advanced a single step forward.

[Igor Borisov_2]

Colleagues, it is scary that the Chinese race at a fast pace about this (missile program), like deaf pigs. No matter how we laugh, but they get a lot .....

[Sarmat Sanych]

In terms of strategic nuclear forces, the Chinese are not rushing anywhere from the word AT ALL. Stuck from Russia, the USA, Britain and France for 40 years.
Only if Russia throws something or is stolen from the West, and that is unlikely.

[Technologist]

And the fact that there is enough life to ruin.

[NordUral]

It is speculated that the range of the Chinese ICBM (SLBM) is about 14 thousand km. In this case, the head of the JL-3 has 10 independent blocks with individual guidanceThat practically reduces to zero the effectiveness of any existing missile defense system.
So I thought, what is better for us - one missile with 10 separable warheads or ten missiles with one warhead of the same power? What is more difficult to intercept and more reliable in a response attack?

[stalki]

So I thought, what is better for us - one missile with 10 separable warheads or ten missiles with one warhead of the same power? What is more difficult to intercept and more reliable in a response attack?

First, the question is: is it cheaper than 10 missiles one at a time or one missile per 10?

[jonht]

There is a little bit wrong, there are still false goals, even if one warhead is ....
And for interception, the moment of dilution and further trajectories of the BB are important.

[lvov_aleksey]

I will just answer. a lot of garbage in the internet. God forbid we will not measure the sizes !!!