Military Review

"Great Purge": the fight against the Ukrainian Nazis

55
One of the most powerful detachments of the "fifth column" in the USSR was the Ukrainian Nazis. By the beginning of the German invasion of the USSR, they were preparing a powerful uprising, which was supposed to end the Soviet power in the Ukrainian SSR.


In September, 1939, Moscow regained the Western Russian lands, lost after the death of the Russian Empire. They were occupied by Poland. Thanks to Stalin, Ukraine-Little Russia became united, Western Ukraine was annexed to the Ukrainian SSR (Ukrainian SSR). The structure of the USSR included Lviv, Lutsk, Stanislav and Ternopil regions.

In addition, in 1940, in agreement with Romania, which also in 1918, seized a number of territories that were part of Russia, Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina entered the USSR. In 1940, the Northern Bukovina under the name of Chernivtsi region was annexed to Ukraine, and the Akkerman region of the Ukrainian SSR was formed from the southern part of Bessarabia (later Izmail region, in the 1954 it entered the Odessa region).

The process of establishing Soviet power in Western Ukraine was complicated by opposition from the Ukrainian Nazis - the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). The organization was formed at the congress of Ukrainian nationalists in Vienna in 1929 as a result of the unification of a number of radical Nazi organizations that were based in Poland (Lviv), Czechoslovakia (Prague) and Germany (Berlin). The goal of the nationalists was to create a single Ukrainian state. The OUN acted as an anti-Polish, anti-Soviet and anti-communist organization, so it was used by Western intelligence services in the fight against the USSR. The main method of struggle was terror. There was an organization at the expense of membership fees, direct extortion and robbery, as well as financial and material support of foreign countries interested in the destruction of the USSR. The leader of the organization until 1938 was E. Konovalets. After his murder, OUN was headed by A. Melnik. In 1940 -1941 the organization fell into two parts: the first most radical - the OUN (b) named after the leader Stepan Bandera, the second - the supporters of Melnik, the OUN-solidarista (OUN (c), the Melnikov.

Melnik and his supporters believed that the stake should be placed on Hitler Germany and her plans for a war with the USSR. Melnikovtsy were against the creation of armed forces in Western Ukraine, because they did not see the possibility of success of an armed uprising without external support. Therefore, Miller and his entourage suggested that as many OUN members as possible should be brought to the territory of the General Government (part of Poland occupied by the Germans with the capital in Krakow) to organize the units of Ukrainian nationalists under the Germans and further use them by the Third Reich in "in the struggle against Bolshevism." In the conditions of the war of Germany against the USSR, these units were to become the core of the Allied Wehrmacht "Ukrainian army." To this end, in Krakow, the Ukrainian-German military bureau under the direction of Colonel R. Sushko was formed and conducted an active work. There was formed the Ukrainian Legion. The activists of the OUN who remained in the Ukrainian SSR had to wait in the conditions of deep conspiracy to start a war between the Third Reich and the Soviet Union.

Bandera preferred to rely on his strength, although he did not refuse the help of the Third Reich. The OUN was supposed to prepare and start a guerrilla war regardless of the foreign policy situation. Such an uprising was supposed to shake the foundations of the Soviet regime in Ukraine and give Germany the opportunity to invade the Soviet Union. Therefore, Bandera focused on the preparation of an armed uprising. However, they did not abandon the possibility of forming units of Ukrainian nationalists outside Ukraine, their military training in the General Government. Bandera prevailed in the west of Ukraine and in 1943, under the wing of the Nazis, formed the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA).

On the whole, the struggle between Bandera and Melniki was fought for the right to head the nationalist emigration, and therefore for the future leadership position in the prospective Ukrainian state. Thus, to act as the sole representative of the "Ukrainian movement" and a contender for financial, material and organizational assistance of the Third Reich. Soon the struggle from the political into the criminal one - Bandera and Melniki killed, seized the material resources of each other, etc. In this internecine battle before the beginning of World War II hundreds of militants were killed.

"Great Purge": the fight against the Ukrainian Nazis

Western Ukraine within the borders of October 3 1939 of the year on the political and administrative map of the USSR March 3 of 1940 of the year

The fight against Bandera

The transition of Western Ukraine to the USSR was unexpected for the nationalist underground. However, the OUN was able to quickly overcome the first confusion and restore the organization. This was facilitated by the fact that the KGB was focused on the elimination of possible Polish resistance (provided state structures, police, army, aristocracy, the big bourgeoisie, etc.) and from the Polish prisons released activists of the OUN who immediately reinforced the underground. At first, Bandera concealed their hostility to the Soviet authorities and tried to disguise themselves and penetrate the new Soviet authorities, the Komsomol, the party and the police. However, in general, this attempt failed and most of the nationalist agents revealed. Then Bandera headed for an armed uprising.

The first attempt to organize an anti-Soviet uprising in Western Ukraine was made by the radicals at the end of the 1939 year. However, the Soviet security officers thwarted her, preemptively arresting the possible fighters for 900. Many OUN activists fled to the territory controlled by the Reich.

At the beginning of 1940, Bandera decided to reinforce the Western Ukrainian underground with personnel. Of the activists who were trained in military affairs and ready for sabotage war, groups (departments) of 5 - 20 people were formed who were supposed to lead the underground and become the basis for the creation of insurgent and sabotage troops on the ground. In January-March, 1940 passed several such groups into Soviet territory. So, in mid-January, a group of 12 militants led by S. Pshenychny crossed the border into Soviet territory from German-occupied Poland in the Kristinopol region near the village of Bendyugi. Violators were unlucky: eight people were killed in a battle with border guards, four were detained later. However, by the spring of 1940, the territory of the USSR was able to penetrate up to 1 by thousands of militants.

At the end of spring - the beginning of 1940, a new uprising was planned against the Soviet authorities in the territory of Western Ukraine. At the beginning of 1940, the Kraków Center (wire) of the OUN began preparations for the uprising. To prepare for the uprising across the border, 60 was secretly transferred to Galicia and Volyn. The first group led by V. Timchii crossed the border in late February, the second group - in early March, the third - 12 March. 24 March The rebel headquarters began to operate in Lviv. For a start, a management system was created: in large cities (Lviv, Stanislav, Ternopil, Lutsk, Drohobych) the chiefs were sent — district guides, each of whom was subject to 3 — 5 interdistrict, in turn, they were subordinated to subdistrict conductors. Each district and district wire consisted of: a chief of staff, an instructor in military training, instructors in intelligence, security, communications, propaganda, and work with young people. The subdistrict organization included 4-5 stanichnyh organizations (in settlements). These organizations were supposed to pick up 40-50 fighters, to organize military training and reconnaissance. The lowest link included 3-5 action movies. According to the OUN in the region there were 5,5 thousand militants and 14 thousand sympathizers.

However, the Soviet state security agencies revealed the plans of the Ukrainian Nazis and delivered a preemptive strike. The most serious operations were carried out in late March - early April in the Lviv, Ternopil, Rivne and Volyn regions. During the mass arrests of suspected insurgents, 658 radicals were arrested. 1939 to June 1940, a large number was seized weapons: 7 grenade launchers, 200 machine guns, 18 thousand rifles, 7 thousand grenades, other weapons and equipment. October 29 1940 was held in Lviv on the 11 trial by the leaders of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. Ten were sentenced to death, the sentence was executed in February 1941.

It is worth noting that in the spring of 1940, the KGB was unable to crush the Ukrainian "fifth column". Bandera suffered an uprising for the fall of 1940, elected a new leadership, and began active preparations, recruiting new members of the organization. Ounovtsy launched an active nationalist propaganda, prepared the material, technical base and personnel for the uprising. Such slogans as “Ukraine for Ukrainians”, “Samostiina Ukraine” were introduced into the consciousness of OUN members. Nazi Germany was taken as an example of a future "separatist" Ukraine. Conducted special military training for members of the organization in the forests. A large number of various military literature, regulations, manuals and instructions, maps were purchased. Weapons were collected in specially organized caches. Much work has been done on the registration of the officers and soldiers of the Ukrainians, who were planned to be involved in the uprising. The plan of the uprising, the “Mobilization Plan,” was developed, and in August it was sent to all regional, district and peripheral organizations. Intelligence of the OUN was engaged in collecting information on the location of military units, their weapons, the most important military, government and economic facilities. Also, the reconnaissance task was to determine the location of airfields, the number of hangars, airplanes, aircraft systems, the number of firing points, the air defense status, etc. All information obtained was transferred to the Krakow center, and through it to Germany.

The security authorities of the OUN paid great attention to the control over the organization’s members, their circular, bloody bail, vacillating members and possible traitors were brutally murdered. Preparing so-called. “Blacklists” for physical liquidation in the first place, they included workers of the Soviet government, the party, the commanders of the Red Army, the KGB, people who arrived from the eastern regions of the USSR, national minorities (for example, Poles and Jews). They were subject to physical destruction at the very beginning of the uprising. Preparing measures for the formation of so-called. "Siniorata" - persons who shared the nationalist, counter-revolutionary views of the OUN and were supposed to be the core of the future state, political and economic apparatus of the future Ukrainian state.

However, the security officers again preempted the enemy. In August - September, 1940 was destroyed by 96 underground groups and grassroots organizations, 1108 radicals were arrested, among them 107 leaders of various levels. The Chekists seized 43 machine guns, more than 2 thousand rifles, 600 revolvers, 80 thousand cartridges, other weapons and equipment. After that, a series of trials over Ukrainian nationalists took place.

Later, when the myth of the "tyrant of Stalin" and the "bloody terror" was created, Bandera was recorded in the "innocent victims" of the Stalinist regime. Now, this myth dominates in the “independent” Ukraine, where members of the OUN are shown as “national heroes” who fought in the “red plague” and “bloody tyrant”. However, the documents suggest otherwise. In reality, the Ukrainian radicals were preparing an armed uprising against the Soviet regime. to seize power in their own hands and create so-called. "Independent" of the fascist-type Ukrainian state with the principle: "Ukraine for Ukrainians". Given that in reality the Ukrainian ethnos never existed (it exists only in the inflamed heads of Ukrainian nationalists), and all the "Ukrainians" - historically representatives of the southwestern part of the Russian superethnos, Bandera prepared cultural-linguistic, historical and the physical genocide of the vast masses of the Russian population of Ukraine-Little Russia (Little Russia-Russia is a historical part of Russian civilization). In fact, these plans for the total genocide of the Russian people, in the interests of the masters of the West, began to be implemented in Little Russia since 1991, after the collapse of Great Russia (USSR). Currently, Kiev is controlled by a criminal oligarchic-thieves regime that uses the Nazis to fight Russia and eliminate the Russianness of Little Russia-Ukraine. Moreover, it is quite possible that soon the Ukrainian Nazis will become the leading political force in Ukraine, and will establish a full-fledged fascist regime.

In preparing an armed uprising against the Soviet power, the OUN relied not only on its own strength, but on the armed intervention of Nazi Germany. Moreover, the Krakow center of the OUN conducted negotiations with a number of foreign governments on direct intervention against the USSR. Thus, the OUN people acted as a real “fifth column” preparing the collapse of the Soviet civilization with the support of external forces.

Also Bandera acted as Nazis and murderers, preparing for the pogroms and the physical liquidation of representatives of the Soviet government, the Communist Party, the commanders of the Red Army, state security organs, Russian immigrants from other regions of Russia and the USSR, representatives of national minorities - Jews, Poles, etc. In fact, all these plans embodied somewhat later, the Nazis, when they began the invasion of the USSR. Many millions of citizens of the USSR perished at the hands of German Nazis. You can imagine what the Ukrainian Nazis staged, learning from their senior comrades in the Third Reich, if they could seize power in Little Russia.

Thus, the "innocent victims" of Stalinism, Bandera in reality were Nazis, murderers, representatives of the "fifth column", preparing the collapse of the USSR with the aim of creating a "separatist" Ukraine, Ukrainian state "for Ukrainians", which led to the terrible terror and mass genocide of Russians national minorities. The current Ukraine partially represents a possible Ukrainian state under the Bandera rule - the Russian genocide, the extinction of the people, the power of thieves and western masters, economic collapse and civil war, and a grim future (Little Russia).


Parade in Stanislav (Ivano-Frankivsk) in honor of the visit of the Governor-General of Poland Reichsleiter Hans Frank. October 1941 of the year

To be continued ...
Author:
Articles from this series:
Great cleaning

The myth of the "bloody genocide of Stalin" in Ukraine
Propaganda lie of Solzhenitsyn
GULAG: archives against lies
"Great Purge": fighting fists
"Great Purge": the fight against banditry
"Great Purge": the fight against basmachestvo
How Enver Pasha tried to create a world Turkic empire
The myth of the "national liberation movement" Basmachis
Mystery of repression
How Stalin defeated the "fifth column"
55 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 19 December 2018 05: 19
    +9
    It can be said more simply: "Happy holiday, fighters of the invisible front! (State security officials)
    1. Fisherman
      Fisherman 19 December 2018 09: 35
      0
      It’s too early, the 20th holiday.
      1. vladcub
        vladcub 19 December 2018 15: 44
        +4
        Let's say with the upcoming holiday! They have enough workers
  2. LeonidL
    LeonidL 19 December 2018 06: 14
    +11
    Yes, today Ukraine is the Nazi-Bandera Absurdistan, a kind of kingdom through the looking glass where lies are truth, paid rebellion is a revolution of "dignity", murder in the back is a feat, Nazism is religion, and religion is Petrushka's servant, where the attorney general has no legal education. the remains of the fleet are commanded by a tanker, the army is the great geographer "North-South", the strategy is a bloody pastor with the face of an unpicked chicken tail, a tongue-tied psycho is the speaker of Zrada, ... and so on and so forth.
    1. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 19 December 2018 06: 35
      +5
      A panopticon and serpentarium based on a circus tent with a Nazi bias!
  3. Same lech
    Same lech 19 December 2018 06: 26
    +7
    Bandera’s frolics well in Lviv when the Nazis broke in ... people were killed as slaughterhouses ... it’s a pity the KGB didn’t finalize.
    1. aglet
      aglet 19 December 2018 20: 11
      +3
      Quote: The same LYOKHA

      Bandera’s frolics well in Lviv when the Nazis broke in ... people were killed as slaughterhouses ... it’s a pity the KGB didn’t finalize.

      they frolic before the Germans arrived. the Germans came a little squeezed ukrov
      1. LeonidL
        LeonidL 20 December 2018 04: 04
        +2
        They pinned it only because they decided to subdue and declared independence. For this, they were clicked on the nose by order of the frenzied Hitler when they informed him that Pavelich in Croatia decided to recognize the new Ukrainian government quickly! ... What is Ukraine like? And Bandera in a prison sanatorium identified. There actually was a setup between the two owners of the UPA-OUN Gestapo and Abwehr, between Bandera and Melnik ... By the way, Julian Semenov wrote popularly about archival facts in one of his works.
        1. aglet
          aglet 20 December 2018 10: 52
          0
          Quote: LeonidL

          They pinned it only because they decided to subdue and declared independence

          absolutely right. did not want to write many letters
  4. Olgovich
    Olgovich 19 December 2018 07: 11
    -14
    In September 1939, Moscow regained the West Russian lands lost after the death of the Russian Empire. They were occupied by Poland.

    Not true: the Bolsheviks have returned Poland West Russian lands in 1918 adopting a decree on August 29, 1918 UNrecognized international treaties Russia with Austria and Prussia on the borders between countries on the territory of former Poland. (About Boards Poland). And the borders of Poland in 1772 (before section 0 were much west of Minsk and passed along the Dnieper in Little Russia.. The Poles and took what they gave.

    Then began slaughter abroadcaused by these "noble" documents. the same happened with Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Iran.

    It was very late and with difficulty that the comrades realized that there were and were the interests of the Russian state, which had been achieved with great blood over the centuries. And their "nobility" was a wonderful invitation to the nationalists of all stripes to show off.
    The return of the gift in 1918 led to enormous blood and is still accused of occupation.
    in 1940, by agreement with Romania, which also in 1918 captured a number of territories, part of Russia, the USSR included Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. In 1940, Northern Bukovina called Chernivtsi region was annexed to Ukraine,

    Again wrong: Bukovina never belonged to Russia and was part of A-Hungary.
    and another fact: the inspired Bessarabian province was tthe territory of RUSSIA, and did with it .... The Moldavian SSR-WITHOUT a single request for this.
    fight against ukrainian nazis

    Good .... "struggle": the Bolsheviks invited the main ideologist Ukronazism GRUSHEVSKY, with thousands of his followers of the ukronazists from western Ukraine forced Ukrainization Russian people in "Ukrainians" in New Russia and Little Russia. Which they successfully did.

    Of course. all this was done for the good and happiness of the Russian people ...... yes
    1. kvs207
      kvs207 19 December 2018 07: 43
      +7
      Fuck logic. Olgovich in his repertoire.
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 19 December 2018 08: 28
        +4
        Olgovich is simply boring. The repertoire is monotonous. He would have been a commentator on Govorukhin's 1992 perestroika film "Russia We Lost". How much time has passed, even Govorukhin began to think a little, but this one - no.
        1. Olgovich
          Olgovich 19 December 2018 09: 35
          -13
          Quote: Aviator_

          Olgovich is just boring. The repertoire is monotonous.

          True, she’s so boring. Yes. These are not Bolshevik false funny tales.

          To challenge the given FACTS - able? No?
          Then bye!
          For you are boring ....
          1. Dirty Harry
            Dirty Harry 19 December 2018 13: 23
            +1
            Quote: Olgovich
            True, she’s so boring. Yes. These are not Bolshevik false funny tales.

            Well, you flatter them ... laughing How's Clive Lewis ":
            "The" history "taught in Narnia during the reign of Miraz was more boring than
            a true story and more fantastic than the most exciting adventure book. "
      2. Olgovich
        Olgovich 19 December 2018 09: 31
        -12
        Quote: kvs207
        Fuck logic. Olgovich in his repertoire.

        The keyword is logic. She is. You have it, NO.
      3. Gopnik
        Gopnik 19 December 2018 14: 12
        -1
        Logic is just iron. Therefore, you simply can’t challenge his comment (((
        1. vladcub
          vladcub 19 December 2018 16: 37
          -1
          Olgovich is right that RI within the borders of October 1913 is not October 2013 with all the ensuing consequences
        2. Aviator_
          Aviator_ 19 December 2018 18: 46
          -1
          Believers cannot be disbelieved. What does the logic have to do with it?
      4. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 19 December 2018 16: 24
        +4
        Quote: kvs207
        Fuck logic. Olgovich in his repertoire.

        Alas, he is right about the Grushevsky and forced Ukrainization of the Russian regions included in the Ukrainian SSR. It came to translating office work into Ukrainian and not applying labor laws to workers dismissed for lack of knowledge of the language.

        And for the theoretical justification of all this bacchanalia from Austria, the famous nationalist Grushevsky was invited - the former chairman of the Ukrainian Central Rada, who under the Bolsheviks became a professor of history at Kiev State University, an academician of the All-Ukrainian Academy of Sciences and a full member of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
        The Center came to its senses only in the mid-30s, when the number of fiery Bolsheviks with their destructive ideas began to be reduced - but it was already too late.
        From such garbage, little ones ... sad
        1. Aviator_
          Aviator_ 19 December 2018 18: 52
          -2
          This was the so-called "growth of national identity". In the late USSR, despite the party incantations about "a new community - the Soviet people", this growth was done by a business that led to a catastrophe. This national identity must be radically eliminated, as, for example, the Americans. They have Indian national identity only in the dances of the wigwams.
        2. Olgovich
          Olgovich 20 December 2018 10: 36
          -2
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Alas, he is right about the Grushevsky and forced Ukrainization of the Russian regions included in the Ukrainian SSR.

          And the rest of the facts cited stupidity and betrayal of Russian interests can challenge? No, you can't either.
          Quote: Alexey RA
          From such garbage,

          , Yes......
      5. LeonidL
        LeonidL 20 December 2018 04: 13
        +4
        Formally, this is really so, but ... The new border of 1939 passed actually along the Curzon line, that is, along the line designated as one of the Versailles solutions and proposed to Lenin, but at this time Lenin was very hoping for a "world" revolution and from the proposal Lord Curzon refused, but no one canceled him! With the lands of Romania, Hungary, Slovakia ... annexed in agreement with the then governments under treaties with the USSR. On the "national" basis of the territory. Now the USSR is gone, Petrushka and his associates are carrying out shock de-communization, it is worth returning to everyone previously confiscated, first of all, returning to Russia the Novorossiysk lands from Kharkiv province to Odessa province. By the way, the headache of the Kukuev sages about the Sea of ​​Azov and the Black Sea, about the Crimea and Odessa will automatically disappear. Then return to Poland its East Kresy together with Bandera and rogulyami - the Poles themselves will quickly and efficiently figure it out. Everything else undoubtedly belongs to Ukraine, along with embroidered shirts, kopankas, Rabbit, Petrushka, Lyashka, Klyachka, Mosiychuk, Porubiy, Gerashchenki, Porasyuk and other characters from the circus of horrors.
    2. Dirty Harry
      Dirty Harry 19 December 2018 13: 19
      0
      Quote: Olgovich
      And the borders of Poland in 1772 (before section 0 were much west of Minsk

      Andrey, you were not mistaken? Probably, east of Minsk? But in any case, Lviv region until 1918 was under Austria-Hungary, which many forget!
      Quote: Olgovich
      Good .... "struggle": the Bolsheviks invited the main ideologist of Ukronazism Grushevsky, with thousands of his fellow Ukronazis from western Ukraine, to carry out the forcible Ukrainization of Russian people into "Ukrainians" in Novorossiya and Little Russia. Which they successfully did.

      This is yes .. although in theory for only one chairmanship in the Central Council of Grushevsky am would have to slap!
      It seems that all Mikhail Sergeevichs are worth each other - at least those with a surname with "G"!
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich 19 December 2018 14: 33
        0
        Quote: Dirty Harry
        Andrey, you were not mistaken? Probably east of Minsk?

        Of course, you are right: it meant: "the Polish border was much to the west of Minsk."
        I wrote "Poland", but I thought about Russia. for which she was east of his. And so it turned out nonsense.
        hi
    3. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 19 December 2018 15: 04
      +5
      You are here Andrey are right n all 100. Grushevsky & Co. was invited by the Leninist party and the Ukrainization was carried out by Shumsky, Petrovsky, Chubar, who achieved the removal from the post of the first secretary of Kaganovich.
    4. vladcub
      vladcub 19 December 2018 16: 06
      +4
      Olgovich, let me supplement you a little: in the Republic of Ingushetia there was a provincial division, and therefore Besorabia and Chisinau and Kiev Mogilev and many others were part of the Republic of Ingushetia, and the Moldavian SSR was not present Moldova. And how the admin border was checked is not significant
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich 20 December 2018 10: 50
        -1
        Quote: vladcub
        Olgovich, let me supplement you a little: in the Republic of Ingushetia there was a provincial division, and therefore Besorabia and Chisinau and Kiev Mogilev and many others were part of the Republic of Ingushetia

        I talked about something else: in 1940, returned to the USSR RUSSIAN Bessarabia province.
        Which is ONLY MONTH. without a single request from anyone, turned ... into practically mono-ethnic MSSR (in Bessarabia, Moldovans did not make up more than 50%).
        Who gave the right, who asked why, why can not be left as part of the RSFSR?
        Quote: vladcub
        The Moldavian SSR is not the current Moldova.

        Why not? the same borders and people.
        Quote: vladcub
        And how the admin border was checked is not significant

        Cross this "admin border" today.
        And it was necessary to think about today YESTERDAY, when drawing "insignificant2 borders.
        1. vladcub
          vladcub 20 December 2018 15: 48
          0
          I don't know how multinational Bessarabia was. Regarding territorial division: in 1922 a mistake was made, which manifested itself in the nineties. By the way, back in 1922 the so-called "Great Russian chauvinists" saw what such a division would lead to. Why Stalin did not return to his plans of 1922, and he became disillusioned with the republican division, is a question. Perhaps he thought that there were more important things to do, maybe more, what?
        2. Severski
          Severski 20 December 2018 18: 23
          0
          According to the 1930 census conducted by Romania, Moldovans made up 56% of the population. And given that the USSR immediately deported Bessarabian Germans, the number of Moldovans increased to 58%. Quite a majority.
  5. akunin
    akunin 19 December 2018 09: 05
    +6
    as they used to say "to burn with a hot iron", unfortunately they did not burn it out, they showed unnecessary humanism. even in the ussr, residents of the western regions of ukraine considered themselves to be the chosen ones and 50 years of Soviet power did not change anything (Bandera was a national hero in the western region even during the ussr). Now you can see what half measures and following the expression lead to.
    If you sit on the bank of the river for a long time, you can see how the corpse of your enemy floats on it
    .can not wait.
    1. Dirty Harry
      Dirty Harry 19 December 2018 16: 00
      +2
      Quote: akunin
      You can not wait.

      "This is how Koreans take revenge," Ichiro said contemptuously: "They can wait for the right moment all their lives, but the offender suddenly died once. Ha! Busi must take revenge immediately. Until the blood has cooled." ("Hyperborean Plague")
      1. akunin
        akunin 20 December 2018 08: 58
        +1
        Quote: Dirty Harry
        Busi must take revenge right away

        absolutely agree, from turnip to turnip.
        1. ironmaniac
          ironmaniac 20 December 2018 21: 03
          0
          Revenge is a dish served cold! It does not bother to wait a bit for the offender to calm down and lose his vigilance!
          1. akunin
            akunin 21 December 2018 08: 26
            +1
            Quote: Ironmaniac
            Doesn't bother to wait a bit
            slightly
            here is the key word. there is revenge, but there is retribution. here retribution should be as balanced as possible, cruel and destructive ("I will retaliate"). we are still talking about revenge, that is, there is no need to wait until "floats."
  6. BAI
    BAI 19 December 2018 10: 08
    +3
    Well, this author is from the collective Samsonov, more or less sane. Reading Sudoplatov, I was simply amazed at how weak the counterintelligence (NKVD) was in Western Ukraine. Nevertheless, they achieved certain results.
  7. Starmaster
    Starmaster 19 December 2018 13: 22
    +10
    From 1945 to 1947, my grandfather crushed these ghouls in the Lviv region, Bandera gave him the nickname "green", because he spent the whole war in a border cap. He talked about life in Lviv, you don't go to a restaurant, they will poison you, in a hairdresser's, they will cut you down, so they cooked themselves, cut each other's hair, at 45 told how they tried to take them alive, especially those who got there because of their stupidity and narrow-mindedness, such by the way there was a majority, and since March 46, they began to just blame, if you don't want to do it well, and with you, they threw grenades in the caches for the winter and didn't stand on ceremony. When these nevertheless surrendered to them such a stranglehold on a stick was worn around their necks, as for catching animals, those who were simply infested with lice and fleas from their caches.
  8. Comrade
    Comrade 20 December 2018 03: 20
    +4
    Quote: StarMaster
    for those with caches, lice and fleas were simply teeming

    While they were rotting alive in the "caches", Stefan Bendera chilled out in the Alps.


    Involuntarily, an analogy suggests itself - while the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces in the Donbass are in the trenches, their president is stuffing his pockets and riding around the resorts.
    1. vladcub
      vladcub 20 December 2018 15: 14
      0
      Recently watched on TV: Poroshenko built a house in Spain for himself
  9. Alexander X
    Alexander X 20 December 2018 19: 57
    +1
    Quote: vladcub
    Recently watched on TV: Poroshenko built a house in Spain for himself
    Now the alternate airport is preparing. We also bought a tagged house in a foreign land for old age ... a female dog (in a bad sense) ... a traitor ...
    1. Red_Baron
      Red_Baron 21 December 2018 04: 55
      +1
      It doesn’t mean anything at all. The house is most likely to stay. The same Gorbachev lived and taught in the United States.
      You do not pay attention to the figure of Poroshenko. A man really believed in himself as God's chosen one. They will have to be torn off from power with their hands. I hope I'm wrong.
      1. Alexander X
        Alexander X 21 December 2018 11: 11
        0
        Well, I can’t even name the names of a public figure who does not classify himself as a god from Olympus. What we have, somewhere else. And according to Freud, a person, when he reaches a certain level of well-being, begins to desire power ... The law of nature ...
        1. Red_Baron
          Red_Baron 21 December 2018 17: 37
          0
          Quote: Alexander X
          Well, I can’t even name the names of a public figure who does not classify himself as a god from Olympus. What we have, somewhere else. And according to Freud, a person, when he reaches a certain level of well-being, begins to desire power ... The law of nature ...

          A very important point, unfortunately, many people think the same way and are mistaken. People just look from their point of view from the bottom. You know what it's called - the Indians do not care about the sheriff. But when you yourself will be in another place you will feel what it is. When a person has to make decisions regarding thousands and tens of thousands of people, at least, and in each case he must be neglected by the interests of smaller groups. When it is necessary to resolve issues not personally but through intermediaries, because it is unrealistic to find out, accept, listen to and plan everything for everyone. Etc. Even a small team suggests thinking more globally. And when this structure is larger by orders of magnitude ...
          And each individual person does not understand this and requires an individual attitude. Which is not possible at all, and if not, it means that he considers himself a god from Olympus. The level of well-being has nothing to do with it. Not only that, there is generally another question.
          And what does a public figure mean? The person who speaks wrote a note in the newspaper? And immediately imagines himself a celestial? I think you are somehow neglecting people.
          1. Alexander X
            Alexander X 21 December 2018 18: 11
            0
            Until I retired, I had to communicate with a fairly large circle of people every day. So I got this impression. Well, whoever wrote one note is just starting to be public. Many of us, for sure, have printed articles in the mass media and this does not make us public people. And, for example, the "fosterling" of the Star Factory is already a public person. And what, you say they are not "starred"? Are the deputies a little higher than the village council? I have dealt with similar figures. Well, the "starry" they already can be traced, etc ... IMHO ...
            1. Red_Baron
              Red_Baron 21 December 2018 19: 21
              +1
              Quote: Alexander X
              Until I retired, I had to communicate with a fairly large circle of people every day. So I got the impression.

              I understand what you mean, but look not only at personal experience, read about management. And the division of labor is about that. Management experience units have and understand the difficulties and problems in it. But in it you very quickly stop noticing people. Because there are only 2 choices. Or do you treat each one individually and dabble in the details, burying the case. Or you look more strategically, paying less attention to everyone. And when it comes to the state and the scale goes to millions. Look at the war, at the worst decisions - when the death of a thousand, ten thousand, for the victory of millions. And this is also all from the same series.
              Quote: Alexander X
              And, for example, the "fosterling" of the Star Factory is already a public person. And what, you say they are not "starred"?

              Vootoot, we are just approaching what I want to say. It all depends on the person, on culture, education, character. What changes will happen to him, how quickly he adapts, and so on. But everything also depends on us. We ourselves make idols out of them, well, let’s not you and I, but all the same, our society. We create interest in them and this launches the chain. But many such figures in another area can be far from an example. What we are shown with frightening regularity by our cultural figures.
              Quote: Alexander X
              Are the deputies a little higher than the village council? I have dealt with similar figures. Well, the "starry" they already can be traced, etc ... IMHO ...

              And here I can not agree. But you and I are these deputies. Here they are next to us today, and tomorrow in some position responsible. Accordingly, all the complexes, all the shortcomings and so on are the same as ours. How we were educated, how we educated ourselves, on what we were educated - so we get such a result.
              In addition to all this, we have very non-critical requirements for ourselves. Good or not, I don’t know.
              1. Alexander X
                Alexander X 21 December 2018 19: 25
                0
                Well, who can you choose as an example to follow? Of the current, who is at the hearing? I’m just wondering and not finding. Can you tell me? The pope
                1. Red_Baron
                  Red_Baron 21 December 2018 19: 32
                  0
                  :)
                  Well, first, from which area? Politicians, cultures?
                  And secondly. You see what’s the matter, no matter who I call you, you can say at any moment, but he has something wrong and actually everything. All people, all have their positive and negative traits. We will take the traits according to the post, and the human ones, either vice versa or in combination? And who decides which features are important to a particular person, and which are not? Can't fornication? I think you are very critical. Do not be like a herd. I tried to argue with many, including about some individuals, and do you know what arguments were offered to me? I don’t like it, and this criterion was taken not from some thoughts and conclusions, but from the media publications that were also determined, I do not like it.
                  But if you want to personally hear my examples, I can name it, tell me from which sphere.
                  1. Alexander X
                    Alexander X 21 December 2018 19: 36
                    0
                    If possible, give an example of a well-known person on the scale of our country, at least so that he does not consider himself a "celestial". At least from some area known to the layman.
                    1. Red_Baron
                      Red_Baron 21 December 2018 20: 28
                      +1
                      Joseph Kobzon, Denis Matsuev. Sergey Shargunov, Dmitry Kulikov, Sergey Mikheev, Nikolai Valuev, Fedor Emelianenko. These are only those that I watched not so long ago and immediately came to mind. But having thought it is possible to name very many from completely different spheres. Not so long ago I was in the clinic, so the deputy head of the doctor treats people with much more respect and prudence than some doctors in specialties.

                      But why do you focus on your attitude to celestials? I can name a bunch of people who knew or know their worth but at the same time great people. For example, Alexander Shirvindt treats himself with sufficient respect and who knows what you will blame him for, but at the same time a great actor and an interesting person, Oleg Yankovsky.
                      You can list many modern politicians, cultural figures, public and others. Who knows his own worth, respects himself, but at the same time is a professional and not a bad person.
                      You did not come up with some kind of idea that dominates everything?
                      1. Alexander X
                        Alexander X 21 December 2018 20: 32
                        0
                        Well, in many ways I disagree. But this is my opinion ... We will stay with our own. It was interesting to hear the opinion of an intelligent person, even if his point of view is different from mine ...
                      2. Red_Baron
                        Red_Baron 21 December 2018 20: 38
                        0
                        Well, thanks, it was nice to talk.
  10. TAMBU
    TAMBU 21 December 2018 00: 54
    +1
    Author. A large number of errors in the text. Not serious.
    1. Red_Baron
      Red_Baron 21 December 2018 04: 56
      +1
      Including semantic.
  11. Red_Baron
    Red_Baron 21 December 2018 04: 38
    0
    The article did not understand the phrase that blacklists were created, those who will be destroyed during the coup, which include national minorities - Poles and Jews. What is it like? If the groups trained and were sent from the territory of Poland, if the support was from the same Poland. Yes, and management, the OUN center was in Krakow. The bottom photo with the caption is a parade in honor of the visit of the Governor General of Poland. It is clear that although all this was based in Poland, it does not mean that they were only Poles, but they were there. So why were they going to destroy them?
  12. Alexander X
    Alexander X 21 December 2018 19: 28
    0
    Quote: Red_Baron
    But you and I are these deputies.

    No, not us. I will not go. They are coming. Why go in the majority? To dominate, abuse the position. Those. to improve their well-being using new opportunities ... Well, with the exception of dreamers and idealists, whom I did not observe in power structures ...
    *****
    Kudato didn’t post it there. This is the answer for Red_Baron
    1. Red_Baron
      Red_Baron 21 December 2018 20: 37
      0
      Quote: Alexander X
      No, not us. I will not go. They are coming. Why go in the majority? To dominate, abuse the position. Those. to improve their well-being using new opportunities ... Well, with the exception of dreamers and idealists, whom I did not observe in power structures ...

      Of course not.
      How is it not us? That is, your neighbor became a deputy of the local assembly, and then gradually grew up to the city level or even the country and he is no longer like you? That is, initially you were better in everything than him? I hope you know what a state is in general? How do its mechanisms work, what are state institutions? That is, according to your "zashkvar" go to work for management positions? Who will then perform these functions? Or do you suggest everyone to return to their holes again? Well, do not bring the situation to quite that insanity.
      "Why do they go in the majority? To rule, to abuse their position. That is, to improve their well-being using new opportunities ... Well, with the exception of dreamers and idealists, whom I have not seen in power structures ..."
      How do you know why anyone is going? What do you think means to rule? And in general, to abuse the situation is a consequence of some actions and not an end in itself. Improving well-being ... do you imagine the possibilities of most officials and, by the way, deputies? Yes, doing business in the middle hands can earn many times more. Dreamers and idealists have nothing to do with it. You forgot the main layer of people. Yes, yes, it is people who go and work.

      Now let's see. You know why anyone is going where, you determine their goals for them, you put everyone under one comb, completely not falling asleep as a person, you smear all officials and politicians with a common paint without even distinguishing who is what and why, you disown them implying that You are better. So who considers himself a celestial?