Military Review

66 vs. 19: UNGA backs draft anti-Russian resolution on Crimea

117
The UN General Assembly was marked by another anti-Russian resolution, which it linked to the activities of the Russian Federation to protect its own borders. We are talking about the UN General Assembly’s support for the Ukrainian draft resolution on the so-called “militarization” of the Crimea, as well as the Black and Azov seas.


66 vs. 19: UNGA backs draft anti-Russian resolution on Crimea


It cannot be said that the members of the United Nations supported the Ukrainian project “in unison”. The main part of the voting participants simply chose to abstain. This is a 72 delegation. 66 Member States voted in favor. "Against" spoke 19.

It should be added that the project was proposed to make mitigating amendments related to the actions of the same Ukrainian side, carrying out provocations on the armed violation of Russian borders. They were brought by representatives of Syria and Iran. But these amendments were rejected by all the same 66 delegates.

The resolution announced the growth of the military presence of the Russian Federation in the waters of the Black and Azov Seas. And even the construction of the Crimean Bridge is called "contributing to militarization."

From the draft resolution:
The deployment of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the Crimean Peninsula is contrary to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine.


The Russian delegation noted that if there is such a clause in the resolution, then the project should note the fact of militarization of Ukraine itself - in particular, the deployment of the American and Canadian military personnel, which by definition violates Ukrainian sovereignty. But those who voted for the Ukrainian project decided to ignore this remark, because otherwise the “main democratic state of the Earth” could “greatly be offended” at their controlled “allies”.

According to the results of the UN GA vote, the president of Ukraine Poroshenko thanked for this kind of result.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
117 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 18 December 2018 06: 04
    +14
    we need to act like our enemies are the same Yankees, for example, a UN resolution that does not suit the United States is immediately hostile and dangerous to the national security, and simply ignored. In short, and in Russian speaking, do not care about them with their decisions from a high bell tower .
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 18 December 2018 06: 07
      +35
      The UN General Assembly does not have a directing authority and direct power ... that's why everything they do and say it is an exact copy of PACE ... Israel sneezes at the decisions of the UN Assembly as well and continues to pursue its own policy corresponding to its national interests .. . It looks like Russia is following the same path.
      1. For example
        For example 18 December 2018 06: 45
        +5
        for this kind of result, President of Ukraine Poroshenko thanked.

        The result - Russian Crimea. good
        Crimea is under the protection of our military, under the protection of the Russian army and navy.
        Here is such a result in the Crimea, Parashenko. wink

        The line for Odessa, Kharkov, Kiev ....

        Lavrov said yesterday: "We need a whole, indivisible Ukraine!"

        The time will come to thank for Ukraine, part of the Russian lands. Ukraine is free from fascists, Nazis, assassins, people and ghouls, Ukraine, where people speak and think Russian fluently.
        1. Cheslav Tsursky
          Cheslav Tsursky 18 December 2018 07: 57
          +6
          Quote: For example
          The line for Odessa, Kharkov, Kiev ....

          Lavrov said yesterday: "We need a whole, indivisible Ukraine!"

          It seems to me that saying this, Lavrov had in mind Ukraine with a Russian-friendly government. Regarding the cities you have listed, I can say that Kharkov and Odessa will undoubtedly have and will be in Russia. But Kiev ... Let's leave the ellipsis for now. Do not you think that the population of Central Ukraine in general their Russianness, as they should indicate? Non-Russianness then we see many of them regularly.
        2. Lelek
          Lelek 18 December 2018 10: 57
          +2
          Quote: For example
          The result - Russian Crimea.

          hi
          It is unconditionally true. Book a train ticket to Crimea. The deadline for opening a railway message is announced.
        3. Dirty Harry
          Dirty Harry 18 December 2018 12: 39
          0
          Quote: For example
          Lavrov said yesterday: "We need a whole, indivisible Ukraine!"

          in the sense - entirely. I do not agree. Poles take away the Lvivschina - why do we need this cancerous tumor!
        4. Adimius38
          Adimius38 18 December 2018 19: 14
          0
          you, in my opinion, misunderstood Lavrov, but he clearly said that no one will fight with Ukraine, and as for the integrity of Ukraine, Donbas Russia somehow did not recognize it, which means that sooner or later it will still be under Kiev control
      2. BAI
        BAI 18 December 2018 10: 48
        +2
        UN General Assembly recommendatory body

        GA recommendations are used by all international courts that issue binding decisions.
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 18 December 2018 11: 03
          +3
          Quote: BAI
          GA recommendations are used by all international courts that issue binding decisions.

          hi
          The latest UNGA decision on Nazism, let's see how it will be implemented.
      3. Olgovich
        Olgovich 18 December 2018 11: 45
        +1
        Quote: The same LYOKHA

        UN General Assembly recommendatory body

        Yes, they all went .....
      4. milton
        milton 18 December 2018 17: 17
        +1
        Quote: The same Lech
        The UN General Assembly does not have a directing authority and direct power ... that's why everything they do and say it is an exact copy of PACE ... Israel sneezes at the decisions of the UN Assembly as well and continues to pursue its own policy corresponding to its national interests .. . It looks like Russia is following the same path.

        Why not apply the veto? Any so-called Intercepts of our strategic bombers in international airspace to declare an attack on our Air Force! The approach of enemy reconnaissance aircraft is considered an act of aggression up to the downing of these objects. As an example, Ukrainians increased the area of ​​their marine interests by 2 times and no one in the West blundered. So it is for us to legislatively unilaterally increase our air zone by 2 times and is not steamed (sarcasm) laughing
    2. passerby
      passerby 18 December 2018 06: 29
      +17
      In any case, there’s nowhere to go, so you’ll have to spit. It’s not because of this resolution that it’s not a bridge to dismantle, but I must say that the situation is unpleasant and you need to understand the reasons for such a voting result. 66 countries versus 19 speak for themselves. It is clear that some of these countries will vote in any case for an anti-Russian resolution, but not all the same 66. Apparently there are flaws on the part of our diplomats who are responsible for clarifying the Russian position. Plus, for example, it’s not clear to me, is there a structure in Russia that is responsible for preparing and implementing a comprehensive response to anti-Russian policies? There are quite a few countries that have been pursuing anti-Russian policies for a long time, and I do not see any retaliatory measures regarding the business of these countries and the citizens of these countries. Why is China in response to the arrest of a businessman by Canada arresting several Canadian businessmen at home, but Russia does not? Why aren't restrictive measures taken against our citizens and companies doing business in the Baltic states? Why are there no restrictions on Russian business investing money in individual EU countries, then, how did these countries introduce such measures in relation to their companies and citizens?
      Quote: ANCIENT
      we need to act like our enemies are the same Yankees, for example, a UN resolution that does not suit the United States is immediately hostile and dangerous to the national security, and simply ignored. In short, and in Russian speaking, do not care about them with their decisions from a high bell tower .
      1. LSA57
        LSA57 18 December 2018 08: 01
        +1
        Quote: bystander
        Apparently there are flaws on the part of our diplomats who are responsible for clarifying the Russian position.

        This position is voiced constantly.
        The Russian delegation noted that if the resolution contains such a clause, the draft should also note the fact of the militarization of Ukraine itself - in particular, the deployment of American and Canadian troops, which by definition violates Ukrainian sovereignty. But those who voted for the Ukrainian project decided to ignore this remark,

        and what's the point if they are told not to listen
      2. sogdy
        sogdy 18 December 2018 10: 45
        +1
        Quote: bystander
        Is there a structure in Russia that is responsible for preparing and implementing a comprehensive response to anti-Russian policies?

        Yes. Accounts Chamber. Based on her findings, the remaining decisions are made.
        1. passerby
          passerby 18 December 2018 11: 31
          0
          "So far, we have not directly set ourselves such a task, but we will try to analyze the impact of sanctions on the implementation of state tasks, programs and goals," Kudrin said. Here is what Kudrin said literally. Where did you get the idea that the Accounts Chamber is preparing countermeasures to anti-Russian policy?
          1. sogdy
            sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 34
            0
            Quote: bystander
            Where did you get that the Accounts Chamber is preparing a response to anti-Russian politics?

            From the general structure and decision-making order. Who should calculate thin spots and retaliatory measures?
            1. passerby
              passerby 18 December 2018 11: 38
              0
              These are just your assumptions; they are not based on law. There, the tasks of the Accounts Chamber are clearly formulated, and there is not a word about preparing a response to anti-Russian politics. Apparently, the government is responsible for these measures, but the exact structure in this government is unclear. And I would like to know whose specific address is spitting.
    3. StudentVK
      StudentVK 18 December 2018 06: 52
      +6
      I apologize, but I am ashamed of our diplomacy (We grab Zvezduley just like that. But what! Fatty boar burped something and everything is supposedly Russia to blame! as with Ukraine until 2014. We give them discounts, discounts for this, can you wipe the DUPU? Ahhh. Lower the price of gas please, please. And why are they ????? They began to conduct exercises with NATO, some of their parts When Yushchenko began to teach in NATO countries and conduct exercises with them. And with us ???? Here is the answer.
      1. Pete mitchell
        Pete mitchell 18 December 2018 07: 46
        +3
        Quote: StudentVK
        I apologize, but I am ashamed of our diplomacy request We take the stars away just like that.

        To be honest, it is also strange to see the oldest diplomatic school in permanent protection. It is necessary to beat backhand so that repeated desires even look askance towards the Russian Federation do not appear. "Ideas" no, not yet announced. Whatever you do, but fellow Jews have an idea of ​​"the survival of the State", so they spit on everyone
        1. LSA57
          LSA57 18 December 2018 08: 05
          +2
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          Need to beat on the backhand

          than??? diplomats have one weapon, word
          [b] [/ b
          [b] But those who voted for the Ukrainian draft decided to ignore this remark,
        2. 5 – 9
          5 – 9 18 December 2018 08: 12
          +2
          Have you seen Nebenzi’s appearances in the Security Council? Today they showed that he was abusing the EU for insulting the Kosovo army. Further - only a mat. And so for a long time. About us, the United States and the World Bank respond better.
          The media and public opinion of the West have long been indifferent to rhetoric - it has become pre-war. They say only for the protocol, so that later the winner can raise the archives as evidence of the war’s kindling by the losers.
        3. sogdy
          sogdy 18 December 2018 10: 51
          +2
          Quote: Pete Mitchell
          it is strange to see the oldest diplomatic school in permanent defense.

          Why stop the rest from hitting themselves in the face?
          So 66 countries decided that the invasion across their border is not being prosecuted. So there’s no poaching either ...?
      2. LSA57
        LSA57 18 December 2018 08: 02
        +1
        Quote: StudentVK
        , and hrenushki than helping and nishtyaki for so.

        their striped feed. that's why they vote
        1. StudentVK
          StudentVK 18 December 2018 08: 07
          +3
          What is the catch in the policy of the Anglo-Saxons is that we won in Russian-Turkish 77 78, and unconditionally, but it was they who took advantage of the ambassadors, landing the Prussian prince on the Bulgarian throne, instead of the Russian prince. So almost everywhere ..
    4. private person
      private person 18 December 2018 07: 27
      +1
      So Russia is blocking, but no one listens to it. The owner of all these UN, PACE, OSCE, one as he decides it will be so. Syria, Iran and those who cross this throat to the owner do not count.
    5. XXXIII
      XXXIII 18 December 2018 09: 09
      +2
      List of countries in the studio ..... smile
      The deployment of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the Crimean Peninsula is contrary to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine.

      Crimea is an autonomous entity before and after, it has nothing to do with the sovereignty of Ukraine, it defines its autonomy as its own sovereignty of autonomy! smile .... The UN apparently did not know this, in general, another scribble regarding the Russian Federation, which affects only the United Nations itself. Simply put, the UN is violating international law on the self-determination of peoples in its own person as a guarantor of international law, some kind of scribe, an international brothel, why are there concerns today ..... hi ..... alimp fell, the world is waiting for big problems .....
    6. Adimius38
      Adimius38 18 December 2018 19: 11
      0
      yes it’s impossible to spit on them, here it is necessary not to spit but act
    7. GibSoN
      GibSoN 18 December 2018 20: 21
      0
      we need to act like our enemies - the same Yankees
      From the point of view of the law! Such a proposal falls under the Criminal Article on Kindle .. Since at the Legal, official level, the United States is not such in relation to the Russian Federation or vice versa! And given that VO is
      Media Registration Certificate El No. FS77-56354, issued by 02.12.2013 by the Federal Service for Supervision in the Sphere of Communications, Information Technologies and Mass Communications (Roskomnadzor)
      The official media, which fully obey the laws of the Russian Federation, post materials and, as a result, are engaged in aiding incitement of interethnic hatred, automatically falls under at least "Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Incitement of hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity." In addition to everything, the publication of such provocative statements in the mass media is considered by law an appeal .. Only one thing is not clear! When a precedent appears and, for something like that they will begin to answer as expected! Well, that is, according to the law!

      This applies not only to a specifically drawn quote. But in general, the relations of many VO participants, not only with regard to the United States as a country, but also to specific people of other countries.
  2. ALEXXX1983
    ALEXXX1983 18 December 2018 06: 04
    +7
    Well, put with the device on this resolution. Anyway, it is only advisory in nature. Israel is constantly presented in Palestine, but he ignores them.
    1. freejack
      freejack 18 December 2018 06: 32
      +5
      recommendatory

      Resolution, this is not even a recommendation ...) Rather a condemnation or something ...) It's just that these 66 countries are moral outcasts, (read "usa + 65 loyal satellites" correctly) who understand perfectly well that the Hohlobenderians have crossed all the boundaries of reason and international the laws... No.
      I just imagined how Denmark would behave if a couple of our "brawlers" perlee on their sea bridge ... hi
      1. freejack
        freejack 18 December 2018 06: 38
        +2
        By the way, here he is "handsome"!)
      2. StudentVK
        StudentVK 18 December 2018 08: 02
        0
        Well, frankly, does Denmark have anything to answer even for our buoys? (This is of course fantastic, since we are not Ukrainians and we won’t go THERE).
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 18 December 2018 21: 16
          0
          Quote: StudentVK
          since we are not Ukrainians and we won’t go HERE).

          Here neither diminish nor add. yes Through the "Big Bolt" last year they went THIS:
  3. Ham
    Ham 18 December 2018 06: 07
    +5
    66 ... less and less each time
    but in general this "resolution" is a filkin letter
    1. Russia
      Russia 18 December 2018 06: 18
      +7
      The collective rabble decided, the collective rabble decided. It seems that the UN platform has completely and irreversibly degraded.
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 18 December 2018 06: 45
        +1
        R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№ hi
        Quote: Rusland
        It seems that the UN platform has completely and irreversibly degraded.

        With US support, even Kosovo puts UN resolutions on the device. wink
        1. Russia
          Russia 18 December 2018 06: 51
          +7
          Hello Paul hi I remember the film "Afonya", where the hero Borshchev, in a remark about the UN, asks: "Who is HE?" Soon it looks like it will be. smile
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 18 December 2018 07: 00
            +3
            Quote: Rusland
            Soon it will be so

            The main thing is to set a bad example. And this has long been done. yes
  4. Aleks2048
    Aleks2048 18 December 2018 06: 14
    -13
    Oh, and I'll grab the cons from the patriots here. But it’s better to have cons and raise this topic even than to pretend that our phrase Crimea corresponds to the actual state of affairs.
    The Russian delegation noted that if the resolution contains such a clause, the draft should also note the fact of the militarization of Ukraine itself - in particular, the deployment of American and Canadian troops, which by definition violates Ukrainian sovereignty.

    Looks like we have in the Foreign Ministry in general difficulties with the perception of the surrounding reality. The UN directly says to Russia: “Russia is illegal in Crimea!”, “Russia has annexed Crimea!”, And our respondents say that instructors from Canada and the United States are at the invitation of the Ukrainian government (the legitimacy of which, even among sensible people, raises questions, but recognized even by the government of the Russian Federation) is a violation of sovereignty. The madhouse was growing stronger in the heads of our Foreign Ministry. request
    1. ANCIENT
      ANCIENT 18 December 2018 06: 29
      +10
      Mr. Yusupov, I won’t begin to minus, only the ukroin is not the state, but its lands torn from Russia, and Crimea is purely our territory. And I advise you to do the same that they bark at the United Nations-Kakal with their howling Russian.
      1. Aleks2048
        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 06: 36
        -14
        Yes, I understand that these resolutions for me personally are not even worth the paper on which they are written.
        But the Russian economy doesn’t want to do this. She is somehow unpleasant.
        For the economy, this is critical. You know the sanctions.
      2. Russia
        Russia 18 December 2018 06: 38
        +6
        The classic has: "poor Yorik", but I would say: poor Alex, tell me, where is this so the brains are put on his back? The downside will be my comment.
        1. Aleks2048
          Aleks2048 18 December 2018 06: 52
          -12
          And I would also add the poor economy of the Russian Federation. wink
          1. Russia
            Russia 18 December 2018 07: 02
            +8
            You know, Russians are strong in spirit and rich in soul. Poverty is not a vice; we are not standing still. wink
            1. Aleks2048
              Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 11
              -7
              we are not standing still

              Indeed, we are not worth it - we will raise the retirement age, then we will stomp the price tag for gasoline to heaven. Do not stand still, however!
              1. Russia
                Russia 18 December 2018 07: 24
                +8
                Man, if it were all so bad, you wouldn’t be spinning here. laughing
                1. Aleks2048
                  Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 37
                  -4
                  Man, if it were all so bad

                  Unfortunately, not everything is as good as we would like. wink
                  1. Russia
                    Russia 18 December 2018 07: 48
                    +3
                    Nothing, without your presence and concern, the world will not turn upside down. wink
                    1. Aleks2048
                      Aleks2048 18 December 2018 08: 05
                      -7
                      presence and concern the world will not roll over

                      Until he turned over from the presence and preoccupations of our Foreign Ministry. laughing
                      And in places, for example, in the USA they said so
                      Nothing, without your presence and concern, the world will not turn upside down.
                      also gave a kick for acceleration. At the same time, we walked around the embassy, ​​and then suddenly we forgot all our belongings there, so we would have abandoned them to catch up. am
                      1. sogdy
                        sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 13
                        +1
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        At the same time, we walked around the embassy, ​​and then suddenly we forgot all our belongings there

                        Alex, do you have a split? Confuse Ukraine and the Russian mission?
                      2. Aleks2048
                        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 11: 17
                        -2
                        Do not remember the story ... In 2017, our victorious Foreign Ministry in the USA was so kicked ... But we swallowed nothing ...
                        And if something is not clear, then read the entire comment thread.
                      3. sogdy
                        sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 25
                        +3
                        Closing a sales office?
                        You seem to have mixed up all the laws and precedents.
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        And if something is not clear, then read the entire comment thread.

                        I remember the flags. What do you have to say, you are our obsolete?
                      4. Aleks2048
                        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 11: 29
                        -1
                        Closing a sales office?

                        And consulates.
                      5. sogdy
                        sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 37
                        +3
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        And consulates.

                        Closing a consulate? Or one of the consular departments? These are two different things.
                        A declaration of war follows from your wording.
                        You are more careful with the wording.
                      6. Aleks2048
                        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 11: 56
                        -2
                        You are more careful with the wording.

                        Express the concerns of our Foreign Ministry. am
                      7. sogdy
                        sogdy 18 December 2018 15: 03
                        0
                        Following the example of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry ?!
                      8. Aleks2048
                        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 16: 05
                        -1
                        I do not understand you a Jew but from Ukraine? More accurately, almost the fascists in power there are still a bit sensitive and will carry out Jewish pogroms.
    2. Ham
      Ham 18 December 2018 06: 32
      +2
      The Madhouse grew stronger in the minds of our Foreign Ministry.

      our DIPLOMACY is the best in the world! Even our enemies admit it ... and our foreign policy and diplomatic work is based on opposing the American style - i.e. if the Americans behave like cowboy Joe in the Wild West - with all the attributes - waving revolvers, shooting at a chandelier ignoring international law, etc., then ours are acting exactly the opposite - speak quietly and observe international law (no one has proved the fact of violation of the Russian Federation MP despite the noise , barking and "resolutions") but keep your nuclear baton ready ...
      that's why we are trying hard to provoke us to a forceful response
      1. Aleks2048
        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 06: 50
        -7
        Our DIPLOMACY is the best in the world!

        speak quietly and observe international law (no one has proven the fact of violation of the Russian Federation MP despite the noise, barking and "resolutions")

        Are you waiting for an analogue of the Nuremberg trials? laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Aleks2048
            Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 16
            -4
            Yes, something already threw me away from the fact that some henchmen of the United States at the UN pour mud on the Russian Federation. But it tosses even more that the government of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation not only failed to push the legitimacy of the accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation, but now the topic has been removed from the agenda and everyone believes that having a region with an undefined legal status, the Russian Federation will have no problems. And neither the government nor the Foreign Ministry take any measures to resolve this state of affairs.
            1. Ham
              Ham 18 December 2018 07: 22
              +1
              could not push through the legitimacy of the annexation of Crimea to the Russian Federation

              you would be there - you would push everything in a stroke :) note: ours are engaged in precisely this - pushing legitimacy ... and soon only fairy tales affect
              but now, in general, the topic has been removed from the agenda, and everyone believes that having a region with an uncertain legal status, the Russian Federation will have no problems

              of such regions on Earth - a wagon and a small cart ... and nothing - live
              1. Aleks2048
                Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 33
                -2
                of such regions on Earth - a wagon and a small cart ... and nothing - live

                But they do not pour slop every day. And the status of the Russian Federation obliges, you know.
                ours are doing just that

                Incredible optimism is not clear only its foundation.
          2. The leader of the Redskins
            The leader of the Redskins 18 December 2018 08: 14
            0
            And with what nations of the world in unity can we now organize an international process? Even if the UN resolution does not pass.
    3. Same lech
      Same lech 18 December 2018 06: 34
      +8
      Russia is in the Crimea just lawfully and formally did not violate any international laws, unlike the Anglo-Saxons ... further, citizens living in Crimea were saved from bombing, missile and artillery attacks of the Armed Forces, from mass executions and killings of civilians ... from the genocide of those who disagree with the policy of forced Ukrainization of Russians ... that we are now observing in LDNR and Ukraine.
      So your comment on idle came. hi
      1. Aleks2048
        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 06: 57
        -10
        citizens living in Crimea were saved

        Citizens in Crimea became citizens of the Russian Federation at the time of the annexation of Crimea, and before that they were citizens of another state to which the Russian Federation had no obligations.
        Those are the salvation of the citizens of another state, is this the plus of our policy? The whole of Africa was just waiting for us.
        with the policy of forced Ukrainization of Russians ... what we are now observing in LDNR and Ukraine

        Well, we don’t give all Tatarstan and Bashkiria a lot of sovereignty, and with Chechnya it all turned out to be embarrassing ... still we are pulling money from us.
        Or recall the shots from ORT and Russia, where they showed refugees with LDNR, among whom there were many men of draft age?
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 18 December 2018 07: 00
          +6
          Those are the salvation of the citizens of another state, is this the plus of our policy? The whole of Africa was just waiting for us.

          Well, the Anglo-Saxons of the Kosovars saved in Kosovo ... why should we be denied this in the Crimea ... double standard however.
          And then the Crimeans themselves determined their fate peacefully and bloodless, unlike the Kiev regime and the Kosovo killers ... what's wrong with that? hi
          1. Aleks2048
            Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 09
            -5
            Well, the Anglo-Saxons of the Kosovars saved in Kosovo ... why should we be denied this in the Crimea ... double standard however.

            The Anglo-Saxons did not dress up in the fact that Kosovo is part of Great Britain. Yes, they actually rule there, but outwardly everything is decent. So no need for a double standard. The situations are different.
            And then the Crimeans themselves determined their fate peacefully and bloodless, unlike the Kiev regime and the Kosovo killers ... what's wrong with that?

            I am not saying that the annexation of Crimea is bad or was a mistake. But it is necessary to finish what was begun to the end. One must be consistent. It is necessary to push through the international arena that our Crimea, otherwise we are kind of in white, but all sorts of things are flying in us. am
            1. Same lech
              Same lech 18 December 2018 07: 26
              +2
              Yes, they actually rule there, but outwardly everything is decent. So no need for a double standard. The situations are different.

              Kosovo creates its army all the attributes of an independent state is practically there and Serbia can not do anything here is the law of the jungle.
              As for the inconsistency of the Kremlin, here it is necessary to look at what he really wants, and here so far there is complete lack of clarity. what
              In any case, what happened to Crimea is the Kremlin’s reaction to the violation of the red line by the Anglo-Saxons ... I mean the unconstitutional coup in Kiev in 2014 ... remember the Nuland cookies.
              1. Aleks2048
                Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 59
                0
                As for the inconsistency of the Kremlin, here it is necessary to look at what he really wants, and here so far there is complete uncertainty

                That is the problem. There is no development strategy. From 2015-2016, everything was left to chance, according to the principle "It will do just that!" And for some reason it all does not dissolve by itself. The tangle of problems is only growing.
                If we are going to arrange a new world order, we must carry it through to the end, otherwise they will only be offended by us and will hamper us with sanctions. And we lose money on this ... You understand that the news on ORT and RT about the benefits of sanctions do not really tell the figure how much money we lost (even at least direct losses, but there are also reputational ones, that is, those that are quite could come to our economy).
                In any case, what happened to Crimea is the Kremlin’s reaction to the violation of the red line by the Anglo-Saxons ... I mean the unconstitutional coup in Kiev in 2014 ... remember the Nuland cookies.

                I agree that neutral Ukraine was a balance. But what has been done is done. And even if it was necessary to introduce a reaction to the actions of the Anglo-Saxons, it was necessary to disagree with the Minsk agreements, especially since everyone understood that no one would comply with them except the Russian Federation. But now it’s not too late. Look how Poroshenko is trying. So it is necessary to give him a hat in Kiev so that not only the crown flies from him, but Ukraine also falls apart into small subjects. And then another conversation may happen with Europe. Only we must first get out of all European courts. But the Russian Federation somehow does not move in this direction. Yes, we can’t bring the Constitution of the Russian Federation back to normal, but we are also talking about how cool our Constitution is. Madhouse.
              2. sogdy
                sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 19
                +1
                Do not feed the Ukrainian troll.
                1. Aleks2048
                  Aleks2048 18 December 2018 12: 10
                  -3
                  Quote: sogdy

                  Do not feed the Ukrainian troll.

                  Do you think Jewish is better to feed?
    4. stalki
      stalki 18 December 2018 07: 25
      +4
      Looks like we have in the Foreign Ministry in general difficulties with the perception of the surrounding reality. The UN directly says to Russia: “Russia is illegal in Crimea!”, “Russia has annexed Crimea!”, And our respondents say that instructors from Canada and the United States are at the invitation of the Ukrainian government (the legitimacy of which, even among sensible people, raises questions, but recognized even by the government of the Russian Federation) is a violation of sovereignty. The madhouse was growing stronger in the heads of our Foreign Ministry.
      You have something with a perception of reality. Crimea is Russian, Ukraine does not have sovereignty, because this is our land plundered. And keep the double standards that swarm in your head. Economic consequences are critical only when the head is not working. And this is a separate issue for the government. And even with such a state apparatus, the economy did not collapse.
      1. Aleks2048
        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 07: 29
        -3
        Crimea is Russian, Ukraine does not have sovereignty, because this is our land plundered.

        Well, for this I must say a special thank you to the man with the stain, and not only on his head, but also on his reputation, as well as Boris. am
        1. stalki
          stalki 18 December 2018 07: 32
          +2
          First of all, you need to give FSW to them, return everything back, and then deal with the rest.
    5. sogdy
      sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 06
      +1
      Quote: Alex2048
      Looks like we have in the Foreign Ministry

      In your Foreign Ministry? We have no such problems. WE remember the battles for Crimea. And FATHER we remember. And you, apparently, no.
      1. Aleks2048
        Aleks2048 18 December 2018 12: 09
        -1
        And you, apparently, no.

        What is the conclusion?
        1. sogdy
          sogdy 18 December 2018 15: 05
          0
          From your words.
          1. Aleks2048
            Aleks2048 18 December 2018 16: 01
            -1
            Wrong logic leads to incorrect conclusions and unsuccessful comments.
  5. Boomandroid
    Boomandroid 18 December 2018 06: 24
    0
    Club of World Grandmothers ... What good is it from them? This is the same as the grandmothers at the entrance, honestly we were shitting on them from a high bell tower!
  6. jonht
    jonht 18 December 2018 06: 25
    +2
    We have already sneezed at everyone for a long time at the UN GA resolution, and where they can accept, we have VETO something more specific.
    So, let d *** go forest, or rather the sea to its owner.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 December 2018 06: 28
    +5
    noted by another anti-Russian resolution
    Not for the first time and, apparently, not for the last time, this general assembly has adopted resolutions of an anti-Russian orientation. The entire international site is usurped by the Anglo-Saxons (USA, England) and their jackals. But progress is in increasing the number of abstentions and those who voted against frankly anti-Russian resolutions in person.
  8. rocket757
    rocket757 18 December 2018 06: 54
    -2
    When, if we have a normal, powerful economy, a united and normal-feeling people, then we will have two strongest faithful allies !!!
    Then they will make decisions, somewhere out there, at first thinking hard!
    And now we have a sho ..... a government whose power is believed ???? yes the majority does not believe, because there is nothing ....
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 18 December 2018 09: 35
      +2
      Do you have Kharkiv roots? To be honest, this constant "sho" is annoying.)
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 18 December 2018 10: 01
        0
        Our roots? Yes, they sprouted in a big country. There are also in Ukraine, within the borders defined by it at the moment.
        I twist a little, Great and Mighty. It’s not from evil, it’s compensation for the fact that I can’t \ do not let me write as I want!
      2. sogdy
        sogdy 18 December 2018 11: 31
        +1
        Quote: Sergej1972
        Do you have Kharkiv roots? To be honest, this constant "sho" is annoying.)

        Western Siberia, Khabarovsk Territory, some more localities ...
        Not an indicator.
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 18 December 2018 12: 27
          0
          So Siberia is! He was born on Baikal, childhood passed there.
          Our country is huge, and military people everywhere served.
          Itself is not noticeable, the talk is familiar. At school, of course, they were taught how to, how to, but the habitat is t.s. leaves an imprint on anyone.
          1. sogdy
            sogdy 18 December 2018 15: 06
            0
            The north of Baikal?
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 18 December 2018 15: 14
              0
              We stood not far from the mouth of the Angara, not far from Nikola
              1. sogdy
                sogdy 18 December 2018 15: 24
                0
                In those places, they only ran with mountain rescuers.
  9. WarriorWolf
    WarriorWolf 18 December 2018 07: 08
    0
    The deployment of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the Crimean Peninsula is contrary to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine.

    They are there at their assembly not yet aware that Crimea is ours? It seems like almost five years have passed ...
  10. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 18 December 2018 07: 25
    +1
    Discussed - decided:
    During the time - ten, at night - twenty-five.

    That's the whole UN.
  11. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 18 December 2018 07: 36
    +1
    And the UN people do not want to accept a resolution such as: "The placement of Poroshenko and his Nazis in the power of Ukraine is contrary to the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine."
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Errr
    Errr 18 December 2018 07: 56
    +1
    Sixty-five American lackeys plus the USA itself. Nothing new.
  14. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 18 December 2018 08: 05
    +2
    UN supported draft anti-Russian resolution on Crimea


    Who would doubt that. With their "resolutions" they go far and for a long time. A herd of political impotent.
  15. 5 – 9
    5 – 9 18 December 2018 08: 07
    +1
    The UN General Assembly and their resolutions are a meaningless talking room with no consequences. The maximum that its resolutions are suitable for is if they are beneficial to shake them in the media.
    The real UN is 5 permanent members of the Security Council with the right of veto. More precisely, the right of veto.

    But the Ukrainians certainly beat, the whole world with them and almost the return of the Crimea :)
  16. Andrey VOV
    Andrey VOV 18 December 2018 09: 09
    +1
    The dog barks, the caravan goes .....
  17. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 December 2018 09: 18
    +1
    Alex 2048
    Yes, they actually rule there, but outwardly everything is decent.
    What exactly is decent in Kosovo in relation to the Serbs? For two days I have been reading your comments and am amazed - clearly an independent from Ukraine (in relation to the Crimea and the LPNR). Well, it would be fine if he only defended his "independent", so he does not climb into all spheres of political life while showing his complete illiteracy. But, which is typical - as soon as they start to decrease, for some reason it immediately becomes neutral.
    1. Aleks2048
      Aleks2048 18 December 2018 11: 12
      -4
      complete illiteracy

      Do you have complete order with literacy? We are ready to agree with everything if only they wouldn’t instruct us. I wonder what it is that I stepped back from my position? Maybe from now on more?
    2. Aleks2048
      Aleks2048 19 December 2018 06: 51
      0
      Chu ... For your deceiving koment called to answer and you ... in the bushes?
  18. jonny64
    jonny64 18 December 2018 09: 27
    0
    For a long time, the UN has become a servant of the world's chief devil. Maybe it’s time to send them away and leave the UN, as well as from the CE. After all, nothing happened. And so we only spend money.
  19. Strashila
    Strashila 18 December 2018 09: 28
    0
    And building up the grouping of US and NATO ships in the Black Sea is a type of purely environmental project.
  20. K-50
    K-50 18 December 2018 09: 35
    +2
    The UN General Assembly was marked by another anti-Russian resolution, which it linked to the activities of the Russian Federation to protect its own borders. We are talking about the UN General Assembly’s support for the Ukrainian draft resolution on the so-called “militarization” of the Crimea, as well as the Black and Azov seas.

    The United Nations has long been a pocket pug at the FSA, so do not give a damn about them and forget.
    But! "Write it down on a piece of paper," and, on occasion, remind and take revenge. yes angry
  21. New Year day
    New Year day 18 December 2018 10: 05
    +4
    In short, Poroshenko was blessed with new “exploits”
  22. Professor
    Professor 18 December 2018 10: 07
    0
    66 Member States voted in favor. “Against” spoke out 19.

  23. Ros 56
    Ros 56 18 December 2018 10: 14
    +2
    And what happened? The sun rose from the west or Ukrainians GDP doubled? Or maybe Antonov suddenly started working? But nothing happened, ordinary blah blah, without any consequences. Spit and grind.
  24. Alexander X
    Alexander X 18 December 2018 11: 26
    +2
    I believe that the experience of our enemies should be used for our purposes. 66 countries voted against us - to analyze who voted and them on our "non-entry" list .... Personally and by name. They, of course, will be "attached to the device" on this list, but "the sediment will remain." Look, Kadyrov imposed sanctions against Obama ... Ridiculous? No - this is a real step of disapproval ...
    Arrested ours in the USA - to arrest and amer spies. TsRUshnikov then a dime a dozen in the same Moscow walks ... And for certain our services have compromising evidence. .. They will organize an army in Kossovo, and we recognize LDNR, the Georgians wanted to join NATO, and we will find the bacillus in their fault, and donkey urine in Borjomi ... and the ban on imports to the Russian Federation for a year until the remarks are removed ... etc. d. And for countries loyal to us, the most-favored-nation treatment in energy prices, for example ... Would there only be political will among our top managers .... IMHO ...
  25. Obolensky
    Obolensky 18 December 2018 11: 32
    +2
    Scary how! As many as 66 countries supported the resolution! But - don't give a damn. It has long been known that our "friends" and "partners" themselves would like to imposingly place their army and navy on the territory of Crimea. But it doesn't. What can they do? Only poke fun at each other in terms of resolutions and condemnations. They will not go to an open armed conflict. And the UN? So this sharaga has long been degraded. As for our diplomats: They behave somehow strangely. Exhortations, protection. Is it really impossible to put a hard point on this topic once? It seems that they speak in such a way that they are not heard or listened to.
  26. axiles100682
    axiles100682 18 December 2018 11: 36
    0
    Most simply chose a wait and see attitude. They don’t want to quarrel with either of these yet. They are waiting for someone to eventually go over and join them.
  27. koshmarik
    koshmarik 18 December 2018 12: 30
    +1
    There is a resolution, there is no resolution - all the same, the Americans and their satellites are doing what they need without looking back at the generally accepted rules in world practice and existing decisions, laws and resolutions. From this we should proceed in all our actions. In this case, what worries most is the behavior of our "allies" so that they live the way they support Russia.
  28. rus-5819
    rus-5819 18 December 2018 12: 32
    0
    For ”66 member states voted.

    It should be added that the project was proposed to make mitigating amendments related to the actions of the same Ukrainian side, carrying out provocations on the armed violation of Russian borders. They were brought by representatives of Syria and Iran. But these amendments were rejected by all the same 66 delegates.

    It would be nice to enjoy a complete list of these two-thirds of devils. If anyone in the know, throw a link
  29. Dirty Harry
    Dirty Harry 18 December 2018 12: 36
    +1
    UNGA supports the draft anti-Russian resolution on Crimea

    It’s terrible ... Probably, now they will expel us from the UN - and they will deprive the veto rights in the Security Council? Oh well... laughing
  30. sah4199
    sah4199 18 December 2018 17: 35
    0
    Quote: rus-5819
    For ”66 member states voted.

    It should be added that the project was proposed to make mitigating amendments related to the actions of the same Ukrainian side, carrying out provocations on the armed violation of Russian borders. They were brought by representatives of Syria and Iran. But these amendments were rejected by all the same 66 delegates.

    It would be nice to enjoy a complete list of these two-thirds of devils. If anyone in the know, throw a link


    The list of voters - as a picture
    https://i1.wp.com/defence-line.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/DupqE3XX4AYomd3.jpg?ssl=1

    [img]https://i1.wp.com/defence-line.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/DupqE3XX4AYomd3.jpg?ssl=1[/img]

    Text of resolution
    https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/ga12108.doc.htm
    General Assembly Adopts Resolution Urging Russian Federation to Withdraw Its Armed Forces from Crimea, Expressing Grave Concern about Rising Military Presence
    The General Assembly today adopted a resolution urging the Russian Federation to withdraw its military forces from Crimea and end its temporary occupation of Ukraine's territory without delay, but rejected an amendment that would have called on both sides to investigate an incident in November involving the seizure of three Ukrainian vessels and crew ....


    Quote: Dirty Harry
    UNGA supports the draft anti-Russian resolution on Crimea

    It’s terrible ... Probably, now they will expel us from the UN - and they will deprive the veto rights in the Security Council? Oh well... laughing

    The USSR and Nazi Germany were already expelled from the League of Nations. USSR - for the attack on Finland - the so-called Winter war 1939-1940 So this is not the first time
  31. Adimius38
    Adimius38 18 December 2018 19: 08
    0
    Petro rejoices and Volodya drives himself into another trap. Now, with almost the full support of the world community, Petro will spread his wings and rush to Donbas, and Russia will again be accused of aggression against Ukraine and will adopt a tough sanctions package that will probably affect Nord Stream 2 and the largest bank such as Sberbank.
  32. watchmaker
    watchmaker 18 December 2018 20: 19
    +1
    Everywhere they are trying to discuss us, everywhere they are trying to frighten, intimidate, put an ultimatum and so on. I think that if the United States and its satellites temper their ardor, the State Duma needs to get together and officially adopt a law on a preemptive nuclear strike from Russia. Bring to the international community that we will not clatter, loudly declare that the defense is defense, well, if anything, we will press the button earlier. I think it will cool the trochs hot heads. And then forever we first get under the breath, and only then, when the damage is incurred, we answer. All mongrels are using this today, they are equipping NATO bases, they are making belligerent statements in our direction, they have completely lost their fear!
  33. 7 poplar
    7 poplar 19 December 2018 00: 41
    0
    It was necessary to heat, and now do not wipe the drool !!!!!
  34. flint
    flint 19 December 2018 10: 02
    0
    It's time to stop worrying about these UN votes. The United Nations has long been manual and nourished by the states. Well voted against and to hell with them. You just need to take note of everything and then bend your line.
  35. 1536
    1536 19 December 2018 17: 41
    0
    The Americans continue to carry out the previously written scenario to capture the Black Sea and eliminate the Russian Black Sea Fleet. If Crimea had not become part of Russia in 2014, it would have been easy to do. It was only necessary to blockade Sevastopol, not to allow our ships to go to the open sea, and then deport the personnel of the fleet to Russia, terminating the current agreement between Russia and Ukraine on the lease of the Sevastopol naval base. At the same time, the Americans would even allow part of the Chernomorka squadron to be relocated to Novorossiysk. This was the way to go. Now the situation for the American "world converters" has become more complicated, but not enough to give up their idea, ie. the previously approved scenario for the destruction of the Black Sea Fleet. And our dual domestic and foreign policy is the best way to promote the development of the American infection in the Black Sea, in Ukraine and in Turkey. If a Turkish Parashenko comes to power in Turkey, then the Americans will close the Black Sea straits for Russia. But they do not want to wait and organize provocations.
    It is necessary to stop various games with "partners" and start responding to adversaries. They want to go through the Kerch Strait, let them go, only along the approved fairway and with our pilots. Without this, any shah on their part would be considered a direct military aggression against Russia. In this case, there will be only one answer - the arrest of border violators. In case of disobedience - shooting to kill.