She captivated 39 states

74


With the design and technical features of the ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" the reader has already met in detail in the 5 number of our magazine for the 1996 year. Today, we will look at a unique anti-aircraft defense system from a slightly different angle ..

SOVIET self-propelled anti-aircraft installation ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" NATO experts began to be interested from the moment when the first data on its capabilities appeared in the West. And in 1973, the NATO members were already “groping” the Shilka sample. Israelis got it - during the war in the Middle East. At the beginning of the eighties, the Americans began a reconnaissance operation with the aim of acquiring another sample of the Shilka, coming out on the brothers of the Romanian President Nicolae Ceausescu. What is so interested in NATO Soviet self-propelled unit?

I really wanted to know: are there any major changes in the modernized Soviet ZSU? It was possible to understand the interest. "Shilka" was the most unique weapons, did not concede superiority in its class for two decades. Its contours were clearly outlined in the 1961 year, when Soviet science celebrated the victory of Gagarin's flight.

So what is the uniqueness of the ZSU-23-4? The retired colonel Anatoly Dyakov, whose fate is closely connected with this weapon, tells that he served for decades in the Air Defense Forces of the Ground Forces:

“If we talk about the main thing, for the first time with“ Shilka ”we began to systematically hit air targets. Prior to this, the 23- and 37-mm ZN-23 and ZP-37 anti-aircraft complexes, 57-mm C-60 guns hit speed targets only by accident. Projectiles to them - percussion, without a fuse. To hit a target, it was necessary to hit the projectile directly. The probability of this is scanty. In short, the previously created anti-aircraft weapons could only put a barrier in front of the aircraft, force the pilot to drop bombs away from the planned location ...

Kandahar Nagaha turn. 1986 ZSU-23-4 ... "SHILK" ... "SHAYTAN-ARBA"


The commanders of the units expressed delight when they saw how “Shilka” not only directly hits the targets, but also moves after the subunits, in the battle formations of the covered troops. This revolution. Imagine, do not roll the guns ... By arranging an ambush of batteries of anti-aircraft guns C-60, you torment yourself - it is difficult to hide guns on the ground. And what does it cost to build a battle formation, to “become attached” to the terrain, to connect all points (power units, cannons, gun-laying stations, fire control devices) by a large cable farm. What populous calculations were! .. And then a compact mobile installation. I came, shot away from the ambush and left, look for the wind in the field ... The officers of the present day, those who think in the categories of the nineties, otherwise perceived the phrase "autonomous complex": they say, what is unusual here? And in the sixties it was a feat of design thought, the pinnacle of engineering solutions. ”

The advantages of self-propelled "Shilka" really a lot. The general designer, Doctor of Technical Sciences Nikolai Astrov, as they say, not a round anti-aircraft gunner, managed to create a machine that showed itself in many local wars and military conflicts.

To clarify what is at stake, let's say about the purpose and composition of the 23-mm quadruple self-propelled anti-aircraft installation ZSU-23-4 Shilka. It is designed to protect the combat forces of troops, columns on the march, stationary objects and railway trains from attacking an air enemy at altitudes from 100 to 1500 meters, at ranges from 200 to 2500 meters at target speeds up to 450 m / s. "Shilka" can also be used to hit mobile ground targets at a distance of up to 2000 meters. It is firing from a standstill and on the move, equipped with equipment that provides an autonomous circular and sector search for targets, their tracking, the development of gun pointing angles and control.

She captivated 39 states
"Shilka" in the Middle East


The ZSU-23-4 consists of an 23-mm quad-automatic AZP-23 anti-aircraft gun, power drives designed for targeting. The next most important element is the radar-instrumentation complex RPU-2. It serves, of course, to control the fire. Moreover, the Shilka could work both with the radar and with a conventional optical sight device. The locator is, of course, good, it provides search, detection, automatic tracking of the target, determines its coordinates. But at that time, the Americans began to install missiles on airplanes, which could locate a radar beam and hit it. And the sight is a sight. Disguised, saw the plane - immediately immediately opened fire. And no problem. Tracked vehicle GM-575 ZSU provides high speed, maneuverability and increased maneuverability. Day and night surveillance devices allow the driver and commander of the ZSU to monitor the road and environment at any time of the day, and communications equipment provides external communication and communication between crew numbers. The crew of the self-propelled unit consists of four people: the commander of the ZSU, the search operator - the gunner, the operator of the range and the driver.

Iraqi ZSU-23-4М damaged during Operation Desert Storm


"Shilka" was born, as they say, in a shirt. Its development began in 1957 year. In 1960, the first prototype was ready, in 1961, state tests took place, in 1962, on October 16, the order of the USSR Minister of Defense was accepted for acceptance, and after three years its mass production began. A little later - the test of battle.

Let's give the floor again to Anatoly Dyakov:

“In the 1982 year, when there was a Lebanese war, I was on a business trip to Syria. At that time, Israel made serious attempts to strike at troops stationed in the Bekaa Valley. I remember that immediately after the raid, Soviet specialists brought the wreckage of the F-16 aircraft, the most modern at that time, shot down by Shilka.

I can also say that the warm fragments pleased me, but I was not surprised at the fact. He knew that Shilka could suddenly open fire in any locality and give an excellent result. For I had to conduct electronic duels with Soviet aircraft at a training center near Ashgabat, where we trained specialists for one of the Arab countries. And not even the pilots in the desert could find us. They themselves were targets, and only, take and open fire on them ... ”

But the memories of Colonel Valentin Nesterenko, who in the eighties was an adviser to the head of the Air Force and Air Defense College in North Yemen.

“In the newly created college,” he said, “American and Soviet specialists taught. The material part was represented by the American anti-aircraft installations Typhoon and Vulkan, as well as our Shilki. Initially, Yemeni officers and cadets were pro-American, considering that everything American was the best. But their confidence was thoroughly shaken during the first combat shooting that the Cadets carried out. The American "Volcanoes" and our "Shilks" were installed at the site. And the American installations served and prepared for firing only the American experts. On the "Shilkah" all operations performed by the Arabs.

Both the warning about security measures and the requests to place targets for “Shilok” much further than for “Volcanoes” were perceived by many as Russian propaganda attacks. But when our first installation fired a volley, spewing a sea of ​​fire and a hail of spent cartridges, the American specialists, with enviable haste, darted into the hatches and took their installation away.

ZSU-23-4М Army GDR


And on the mountain burned brightly spaced targets. For all the shooting time, Shilki worked flawlessly. "Volcanoes" had a number of serious damage. One of them was managed only with the help of Soviet specialists ... "

It is appropriate to say here: the intelligence of Israel has sniffed out that the Arabs first engaged the Shilka back in the 1973 year. At the same time, the Israelis quickly planned the operation to capture the Soviet-made ZSU and successfully conducted it. But the experts of NATO investigated “Shilka” first of all. They were interested in how effective it is of the American 20-mm ZSU Vulkan XM-163, can you take into account its best design features when refining the West German 35-mm paired self-propelled Gepard, which is just beginning to enter the troops.

The reader will surely ask: why, later, in the early eighties, did the Americans need another sample? "Shilka" was rated by experts very highly, and therefore, when it became known that they began to produce modernized versions, they decided to get another car across the ocean.

Our self-propelled unit really constantly modernized, in particular, one of the options even acquired a new name - ZSU-23-4М “Biryusa”. But elementally it did not change. Unless a device commander appeared over time - for the convenience of targeting, transferring the tower to the target. Every year, the blocks became more perfect and more reliable. Locator, for example.



And, of course, the authority of “Shilka” has grown in Afghanistan. There were no commanders there who would be indifferent to her. There is a column on the roads, and suddenly from an ambush fire, try to organize the defense, all the cars have already been shot. Salvation one - "Shilka". Long queue in the camp of the enemy, and the sea of ​​fire in position. They called self-propelled installation "Shaitan Arb". The beginning of her work was determined immediately and immediately began to withdraw. Thousands of Soviet soldiers saved the life of "Shilka".

In Afghanistan, Shilka fully implemented the ability to fire at ground targets in the mountains. Moreover, a special “Afghan version” was created. In ZSU radio equipment complex was withdrawn. Due to him, the ammunition was able to increase from 2000 to 4000 shots. A night sight was also installed.



An interesting touch. Columns, accompanied by "Shilka", rarely attacked not only in the mountains, but also near the settlements. The ZSU was dangerous for manpower, hidden behind clay adolescents - the “Sh” projectile fuse triggered when it hit the wall. Effectively, Shilka beat and for lightly armored targets - armored personnel carriers, vehicles ...

EVERY weapon has its own destiny, its own life. After the war, many types of weapons quickly became obsolete. 5-7 years - and there was a more modern generation. And only "Shilka" for more than thirty years in the battle formation. She justified herself during the Gulf War in 1991, where the Americans used various means of air attack, including the well-known B-52 bombers in Vietnam. There were very confident statements: they, they say, would smash targets to pieces.



And now another approach at low altitudes of the Shilka ZSU together with the Strela-3 complex is opening fire. One aircraft immediately caught fire engine. No matter how hard B-52 tried to reach the base, it was not possible.

And one more indicator. "Shilka" is in service in the 39-countries. And it was bought not only by the allies of the USSR in the Warsaw Pact, but also by India, Peru, Syria, Yugoslavia ... And the reasons are as follows. High fire efficiency, maneuverability. "Shilka" is not inferior to foreign counterparts. Including the famous American installation "Volcano".

The Vulkan, put into service in the 1966 year, has a number of advantages, but in many respects it is inferior to the Soviet Shilka. The American ZSU can shoot at targets that go at a speed of no more than 310 m / s, while the Shilka operates at higher speeds - up to 450 m / s. My interlocutor, Anatoly Dyakov, said that he acted in a training battle at the Vulcan in Jordan and could not say that the American car was better, although it was adopted later. Approximately the same opinion and Jordanian experts.

Egyptian "Shilki" at the 1973 parade


The principal difference from the "Shilka" is ZSU "Cheetah" (Germany). The large caliber of the gun (35-mm) makes it possible to have projectiles with a fuse and, consequently, a greater effectiveness of destruction — the target is hit by fragments. West German ZSU can hit targets at altitudes up to 3 kilometers, flying at speeds up to 350 — 400 m / s; its firing range is up to 4 kilometers. However, the Cheetah has a lower rate of fire than the Shilka — 1100 shots per minute versus 3400 (Vulcan, up to 3000), it is more than twice as heavy as 45,6 tons. And we note that the “Cheetah” was adopted by the 11 years later “Shilka”, in the 1973 year, this is a machine of a later generation.

In many countries, the French anti-aircraft artillery complex "Turren" AMX-13 and Swedish "Bofors" EAAK-40 are known. But they do not exceed the ZSU, created by Soviet scientists and workers. "Shilka" and today is in service with parts of the land forces of many armies in the world, including the Russian.

ZSU-23-4 cover Tanks T-55 on exercises


Anti-aircraft self-propelled installation ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" Egypt 1973


Anti-aircraft self-propelled unit ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" Western group of troops. Germany 1985
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dust
    +11
    8 June 2012 08: 51
    Personally, I like this setup for its idea and its implementation, but it is hard to believe something in the ability to bring down the B-52!
    Once in a movie about Iraq, the name came out. something about killers or about the generation of killers, there is an episode when a column of hummers stumbled upon such an installation - according to the logic, horns and legs should remain from that column, but then it would not be an American film, and Iraqis. of course. did not hit. where it is necessary and stubbornly awaited the arrival of helicopters to ingloriously die ...
    1. +16
      8 June 2012 09: 34
      "Generation Kills" - that was the name of that film, and I remember the episode. Opposite "Shilka," a column of "Hummers" with small arms won't work, definitely. You can only argue about the number of minutes it would take from the "hammers" smoking frames.
      1. +2
        8 June 2012 11: 41
        yes, but Shilka’s time is running out, is there a new shift in the zsu or not?
        1. Mut Anthony
          +4
          8 June 2012 13: 22
          But what about tunguska? also a great car, it has great potential, you can upgrade it as much as you like! She will last a long time in the troops, a very long time ...
          1. Redpartyzan
            +4
            8 June 2012 15: 55
            Tunguska was replaced by the S-1 shell
        2. +1
          8 June 2012 19: 06
          Quote: Civil
          yes, but Shilka’s time is running out, is there a new shift in the zsu or not?

          Yes, already the third generation, not counting the modernization of generations. Shilka-Tunguska-Shell.
          But there were cases when the hydraulics handed over - can you imagine what a chipper near the car was when the trunks failed
      2. +1
        8 June 2012 19: 54
        it's about seconds ... plus
    2. Denzel13
      +4
      8 June 2012 11: 27
      HMMWV didn't have a chance for sure. In January 1990, in Baku, I saw that I had done a ZU-23-2 with three "Volga" vehicles in which the "wrong" citizens were traveling just that had fired at the checkpoint. And in a few seconds, and there are only 2 barrels.
      1. 0
        10 June 2012 23: 39
        There are four trunks !!!!
        1. 0
          16 June 2012 01: 40
          I apologize, but I want to clarify. The towed anti-aircraft gun ZU-23-2, indeed, has TWO bastards.
          These guns for mobility, put in the back of the Urals or ZIL-131.
    3. tariff
      +4
      8 June 2012 12: 00
      I agree that the B-52 was unlikely to operate at an altitude below 2500. And in the "Generation of Assassins", indeed, a Marine unit on the HMMWV stormed the Iraqi airfield without preliminary reconnaissance (the unit earned a medal laughing ). Having pounced on the Shilka, they rejoiced for a long time that the Iraqis abandoned the equipment and the airfield, if they had no chances to get there with the crews.
      1. +3
        8 June 2012 12: 07
        In Iraq, the B-52 was shot down and who, maybe, Shilka.
        1. Aleksey67
          +9
          8 June 2012 13: 37
          In Yaroslavka, beyond the MKAD, it stands on a pedestal.

          1. mox
            mox
            +2
            9 June 2012 00: 07
            Monument to soldiers of the internationalists in Poltava
            This Shilka used to stand on a pedestal at the Poltava Higher Anti-Aircraft Missile School named after g.a. Vatutina N.F.
          2. 0
            30 August 2014 18: 43
            Quote: Aleksey67
            In Yaroslavka, beyond the MKAD, it stands on a pedestal.



            And not only on a pedestal, according to Wikipedia. It is still in service (although of course Tunguzka, Shell and Thor force it out). Armies in which ZSU Shilka is in service:
        2. prispek
          -1
          12 June 2012 01: 33
          How? B-52 was bombed from 4-6 km. Shilka has a vertical firing range of 1500m.
          1. 0
            12 June 2012 10: 36
            Terry ignorance again. At least they would read about the tactics of using the B-52 during the 1991 war of the year. And I wonder why 4-6 km, and not 10-12?
            1. prispek
              +1
              14 June 2012 01: 08
              Quote: Kars
              Terry ignorance again.

              Again arrogant contempt for the opinions of others. "February 3, 1991. B-52G" Stratofortress "serial number 59-2593, call sign Hulk 46, 4300th Bomber Wing (conditional) of the USAF was returning from a sortie to Diego Garcia airfield. Less than 30 km. From the airfield at the aircraft suffered a complete failure of the electrical system, which led to the interruption of the fuel supply ... The crew ejected ... three of the six pilots were killed ... Russian author Mikhail Nikolsky refers to the publication in the Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper of the deputy chief of staff of the USSR Air Defense Forces, Colonel V Suzdaltsev, which claims that the crashed B-52 was previously damaged by a MANPADS missile or ZSU-23-4 fire. According to this version, the B-52s carried out low-altitude bombing and were therefore vulnerable to fire from the ground ... "I admit the numbers 4- 6 km. took almost from the ceiling, that is, from Wikipedia and never found confirmation of them anywhere after. (My jamb. A-ta-ta, a-ta-ta!) But even in memory there were news broadcasts on television, one of which said that B-52s carried out carpet bombing with conventional (outdated) FABs from low altitudes (sorry, there is nothing to confirm) In the description of the tactics of using the B-52 in the "Desert Storm" operation, I never met an indication of heights. So "your" 10-12 km is not a bit more reliable than "mine" 4-6 km. But if you admit the possibility of hitting a target at an altitude of 10-12 km. from ZSU-23-4
              Quote: Kars
              In Iraq, the B-52 was shot down and who, maybe, Shilka.

              either we have possessed superweapons for almost half a century, or world literature has lost the great science fiction writer in your face.
              Sincerely. Forever yours. Prispec
              1. -1
                14 June 2012 18: 33
                Just lovely, keep up the good advise you ---
                Quote: Kars
                If only revered about the tactics of using B-52 during the war xnumx of the year

                And in your fairy tale a simple excuse, you would write at what heights did B-52 perform tasks

                And about what you wrote --- the American wiki wrote that he inflicted damage on himself from the aft defense point, and what he later refused was not important.

                quote from the same
                Starting on 16 on January 1991, the flight of B-52Gs flew out from Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, refueling an air route, hit the targets in Iraq, returned home - this is a journey of 35 hours and 14000 miles there and back. He set a record for long-distance combat mission, breaking a record previously held by the Air Force Vulcan bomber in 1982. [159] [160] B-52Gs operated from bases in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, RAF Fairford in the United Kingdom; Moron AB, Spain and the island of Diego Garcia flew to bomb Iraq, first at low altitude. After the first three nights, B-52 moved to high-altitude missions, and not, which reduced their effectiveness and psychological impact compared to low altitude, the role originally played.

                During the conflict, several Iraqi air-to-air demands were made, including an Iraqi pilot, Hudai hijab, who allegedly fired Pennant R-27 R missiles from his MiG-29 and damaged B-52G at the premiere of The Gulf War. [165] However, the US Air Force disputes this claim, stating that the bomber was actually injured by friendly fire, AGM-88 High-Speed ​​Anti-Radiation Defense (Harm) on Network fire control radar tail gun B-52, the plane was subsequently renamed “in danger”. [166] Shortly after this incident, General George Lee Butler stated that the position of the shooters on the B-52 crew had to be removed and the turret gun was permanently turned off from October 1 to October 1991
                Quote: prispek
                Sincerely. Forever yours. Prispec

                I look forward to continuing, and preferably in the subject of T-44
                1. prispek
                  +1
                  15 June 2012 00: 05
                  Quote: Kars
                  And in your fairy tale a simple excuse, you would write at what heights did B-52 perform tasks

                  No, you love to invent fairy tales, for example, about the Tatar-fascist .... ugh! about the Polish-German invasion. And infa from here: http://artofwar.ru/p/ponomarchuk_e/text_0100.shtml Well, I read about the tactics of using the B-52, but you read my post I don’t know. And if you read it, then most likely not everything got into it from the abundance of information in your head. probably dropped somewhere: In the description of the tactics of using the B-52 in the operation "Desert Storm" did not meet the indication of heights "And you do not give numbers, which does not look like you, did you get sick? I am just worried. Especially not a good symptom this is the text of your excuse after the phrase "quote from right there" What would that mean? And the manner of quoting yourself ... I'm at a loss ...
                  Quote: Kars
                  And about what you wrote --- the American wiki wrote

                  Where does the American wiki? I can't read in American.
                  Quote: Kars
                  I look forward to continuing, and preferably in the subject of T-44

                  Well, of course, just get better prepared
                  1. +1
                    15 June 2012 09: 24
                    Quote: prispek
                    And you don’t give numbers, which doesn’t look like you,

                    Well, if the Yankees do not give, then what can I do ---- but I calculated that you were able to draw conclusions --- at least for ease I highlighted the data in red
                    Quote: Kars
                    Iraq, first at low altitude. After the first three nights, the B-52 moved to high-altitude missions rather than, which reduced their effectiveness and psychological impact compared to the low altitude role originally played.


                    As you can see from the description of the B-52 application, it is clear that the first strikes were made from a low height, and then for some reason, as I understand it, for you (for some reason the Yankees probably decided to start strikes from a higher height, no one bothered them with anything , nobody seriously took the shilka, B-52 only had to fight themselves) decided, at the expense of efficiency, to switch to strikes from a higher height. In principle, that's all, again I had to carry out explanatory work.
                    Quote: prispek
                    Where does the American wiki? I can't read in American.

                    Master the computer, google translator drives.
                    1. prispek
                      0
                      15 June 2012 23: 15
                      Quote: Kars
                      Master the computer, google translator drives.

                      Steers then he steers. Only reading these translations without half a liter is not possible. I kind of write in Russian and in plain language, you also seem to set out normally, but to understand each other is a problem. And if I’m not mistaken, in one of your posts you called the data from Wikipedia not convincing, since everyone is lazy to write there. So is the American version of Wikipedia more worthy than ours? And why the heights in Russian Wikipedia do not suit you. Because the shilka doesn’t get there? So maybe it's still not silk?
                      Quote: Kars
                      Well, if the Yankees do not give, then what can I do ---- but I calculated that you were able to draw conclusions --- at least for ease I highlighted the data in red

                      Very good! The Yankees do not give numbers, but I have to draw conclusions and then you will demand that they be substantiated by documents. And what conclusions should I draw? What did the B-52 bomb from the heights of the flames available for fire? But this is not provable, no matter how much we like it.
                      Quote: Kars
                      .In principle, that's all, again I had to carry out explanatory work.

                      Please, just a little more. Explain what the phrase you highlighted in red means: "Fire control radar tail pistol B-52"
                      1. -1
                        15 June 2012 23: 33
                        Quote: prispek
                        Only read these translations without half a liter is not possible

                        Drinking is bad.
                        Quote: prispek
                        And if I’m not mistaken, in one of your posts you called the data from Wikipedia not convincing, because everyone who is not lazy is writing there

                        I don’t remember myself, but in principle I agree, if you have B-52 flight missions I read, even in Aglitz. you can refute it - I am only for it.
                        Quote: prispek
                        And why the heights in Russian Wikipedia do not suit you

                        And what are they there? I will give a description from the mentioned source
                        Gulf War (1991)
                        In the Gulf War in 1991, 70 B-52G bombers participated, making 1624 sorties. One plane was lost.

                        Quote: prispek
                        Very good! The Yankees do not give numbers, but I have to draw conclusions and then you will demand that they be substantiated by documents. And what conclusions should I draw? What did the B-52 bomb from the heights of the flames available for fire? But this is not provable, no matter how much we like it.

                        And what do you think is low height?
                        Quote: prispek
                        Fire control radar tail pistol B-52 "

                        Radar-driven tail firing point.
                        Cannon armament: 1 automatic six-barreled 20 mm gun M61 Volcano at the tail of the aircraft, dismantled in 1994
    4. +7
      8 June 2012 16: 07
      And in the sixties it was a feat of design thought, the pinnacle of engineering solutions. "

      I would not be so categorical in assessing the novelty of the concept

      Anti-aircraft tank Flakpanzer IV Wirbelwind "Virbelvind" The cabin, or tower, was mounted on the proven PzKpfw IV Ausf J chassis, which easily allowed the Flakpanzer IV to join the ranks of air defense platoons as part of tank regiments. The Wirbelwind concept was proposed by Karl Wilhelm Krause, officer of the 12th SS Panzer Division Hitler Jugend. The Wirbelvinda layout retained the PzKpfw IV course machine gun, and while the minimum elevation angle of the main armament reached minus 10 degrees, the Flakpanzer IV was also able to act as an anti-personnel weapon. All these machines, however, were not put on stream - since July 1944 only 86 units were produced. The design had only two drawbacks - thin 1b-mm armor and manual turret rotation mechanism. By the fall of 1944, the 20 mm Flak 38 were considered less effective than the 37 mm Flak 43, and the production of the Wirbelwinds was turned in favor of the Ostwinds (east wind), very similar to the Flakpanzer IV, but equipped with a single 37 mm the gun.
      1. 755962
        +3
        8 June 2012 21: 09
        Tell me what kind of modification.
        1. mox
          mox
          +1
          8 June 2012 23: 44
          One of the options for ZSU-23-4M4 is a dead end. In the series did not go.
          The main disadvantages are preserved - the engine, analog RPK. Slightly added firepower due to Igla MANPADS
          1. mox
            mox
            +1
            8 June 2012 23: 55
            Polish Variant of modernization ZSU-23-4MR "Biala"
            Completely replaced by the PKK, added TV + Thunder rockets.
            Dane taktyczno-techniczne

            Waga 20.5t
            Dugo 6.54 m
            Wysoko 2.95 m
            Szeroko 2.25 m
            Zaoga 3
            Pancerz 8.3-9.2m
            Uzbekistan
            -gwne 4x23 mm chodzone ciecz dziako AZP-23 + 2,000 naboi
            -boczne 4xGrom
            Silnik V-6R 6 cylinder - Diesel, 280 KM (210 kW)
            Operationsracyne
            zasig 450k
            prdko max. 50 km

            Could not sell to anyone.
            1. mox
              mox
              +2
              9 June 2012 00: 00
              Belarusian modernization
              In ZSU-23-4 "Shilka" modernization is carried out as an artillery unit, and tracked chassis. At the same time, measures are being taken to reduce the visibility of the product in the optical and infrared frequency ranges.

              The use of modern communications and navigation equipment is envisaged. To improve the living conditions of the crew, air conditioning is installed in the tower.
              ZSU-23-4 Shilka
              weaponry

              Improving the combat qualities of the artillery unit is achieved by:

              transfer of a radar instrument complex to a modern solid-state element base
              digital signal processing techniques
              increase radar noise immunity from passive interference and reflections of local objects
              improving the reliability of detection and tracking of tactical and attack aircraft, including low-flying, maneuvering and suddenly appearing, as well as helicopters, cruise missiles and remotely piloted aircraft
              replacement of the computing device with a single digital computer system (DAC), coupled with a digital instrument tracking system (CPSS) with power actuator guidance weapons

              An operational assessment of the combat readiness of an arms control system is carried out using an automated control system for the operability of electronic equipment.

              The functions of automated control of the technical condition of the radar equipment and verification of the correct functioning of the weapon fire control system, as well as training and education of operators, are implemented by the central computer system.
              ZSU-23-4 Shilka

              The result of the modernization of the fire control system is to increase the accuracy of pointing weapons and tracking the target and, as a result, to increase the likelihood of hitting air targets from 0,07 ... 0,12 on an unmodified Shilka to 0,3 ... 0,6 on a modernized . According to statistics, according to the results of live firing, the projectile consumption for one shot down target is 3300 ... 5700 units on an unmodified Shilka, and 300 ... 600 on an upgraded one.
              Tracked chassis

              The modernization of the tracked chassis is aimed at:

              improved technical characteristics of chassis systems
              speed increase
              Improving ergonomic performance in the driver’s workplace
              maintainability improvement
              reduced maintenance time

              Tracked chassis GM-575

              The results of the modernization of the tracked chassis are:

              providing the ability to escort modern tank columns with the upgraded Shilka to provide air cover by increasing the maximum speed of the ZSU to 60 km / h against 50 km / h, increasing the average speed on a dry dirt road to 40 km / h against 30 km / h
              reduction of efforts on chassis controls to the required ergonomic standards

              Upgrade Options

              Placement of the launcher of two Igla anti-aircraft homing missiles, which increases the affected area to 5,2 km
              Installation of a self-defense system and laser warning
              Replacing active night vision devices with passive
              Installing an economical diesel power system instead of a gas turbine engine

              ZSU-23-4 Shilka
              1. mox
                mox
                0
                9 June 2012 00: 04
                And finally, the Ukrainian version of the modernization of Shilka
                ZRAK "Donets"


                ZRAK "Donets" is a combination of the modernized tower from the ZSU-23-4 and the chassis of the diesel T-80UD tank, serially produced in Kharkov. Outside the tower, on its sides, there are two paired transport and launch containers with missiles from the Strela-10M air defense missile system. The missiles, which have an autonomous passive homing system, are capable of striking aerial virgin lands with a range of up to 4500 m and an altitude of 3500 m. The Shilka artillery unit, consisting of four 23-mm anti-aircraft guns, has been left unchanged, but the ammunition load has been increased from 2000 to 4000 rounds.

                The old radio sight, supplemented by a new digital fire control system, has been retained. An external target designation system and a navigation system are installed.

                An attempt to enter Pakistan, but unsuccessful.
          2. 0
            10 June 2012 23: 43
            Why is she in the series? For modernization, it’s not bad at all (not in our army, since there are Tunguska and armor)!
  2. islandpan
    +6
    8 June 2012 08: 53
    shilka - a good machine! wink
  3. +6
    8 June 2012 08: 53
    Another manifestation of Russian ingenious engineering! And this technique will always be relevant, as long as there will be helicopters and attack aircraft!
    1. Mut Anthony
      0
      8 June 2012 13: 27
      Mdaa .. Great car, it’s also very beautiful and ergonomic, only the crew had little comfort, in winter you can only be in a fur coat.
  4. dimarm74
    +11
    8 June 2012 08: 56
    Ischo forgot to mention in the article that "Shilka" was used quite effectively in the January battles in Grozny in 1995, covering tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and assault groups.
  5. +6
    8 June 2012 09: 22
    Shilka is a great example of the superiority of the domestic weapons school.
    1. +3
      8 June 2012 09: 43
      The characteristic features of the domestic weapons school are simple, reliable, relatively inexpensive and very effective.
  6. Tirpitz
    +6
    8 June 2012 09: 42
    Logically, this device should be quite effective against modern tanks (namely the latest generations), since a volley of it will sweep away all the electronics from the tower. people in tana will be in a rather delicate situation. But you need to act out of ambush. IMHO
    1. +3
      8 June 2012 10: 27
      But the OFS is not suitable?
    2. Sehiru san
      +1
      8 June 2012 10: 56
      Correct words.
    3. Denzel13
      +3
      8 June 2012 11: 32
      I fully confirm. I already wrote that once it turned out that of the 2A42, 30 mm that the BMD-2 stands hit in the T-72, OFZ ammunition. The result - the tank stood up, there was almost nothing left, and the crew in a complete stupor was shell-shocked. And this gun has only 600 v / m.
    4. +4
      8 June 2012 12: 33
      Quote: Tirpitz
      Logically, this device should be quite effective against modern tanks (namely the latest generations), since a volley of it will sweep away all the electronics from the tower.


      and removes all DZ ...
    5. Katran
      +2
      8 June 2012 18: 44
      The article on the site was about BMPs, and so on the tests there were two BMP2 variants with a 76mm gun and 30mm automatic, shelling the tanks showed that after hitting a 76mm shell, the tank continues to fight, the effect of the 20mm gun like Denzel described in the comment above, in the end was The BMP2 variant with a 20mm gun was adopted.
      1. +2
        8 June 2012 19: 40
        Quote: Katran
        as a result, the BMP2 variant with a 20mm gun was adopted.

        On the BMP-2 was a 30-mm gun, at least in 1985. But the gun is good. The supercharger could be made more efficient in the tower so that you could open and fire from the top of the vehicle in the airborne compartment (those holes in the airborne compartment are full), and it is possible to strengthen mine reservation, and in my opinion the car is successful. BMP-2 with a 76-mm gun did not see, I can not say anything. As Denzel described, you can still use mines with shrapnel.
        1. Katran
          +4
          8 June 2012 20: 54
          sorry 30mm sealed of course
  7. Kibb
    +2
    8 June 2012 09: 45
    "projectiles with a fuse" Maybe with a Remote fuse?
    1. Eugene
      +3
      8 June 2012 12: 50
      as far as I know this is called a proximity fuse.
  8. Sehiru san
    +4
    8 June 2012 10: 59
    She showed herself most effectively when suppressing firing points.
    The power, even of a relatively short (in her terms) line, is comparable to a good howitzer shell. And the accuracy of pointing is simply incomparable.
  9. George IV
    +3
    8 June 2012 11: 08
    Effectively with tanks, I don’t even know how to disorient the crew, slightly damage the tank body kit and possibly set fire to it. Although if you hit one point, then of course it digs through it. But an armored personnel carrier cuts it in half in half for sure.
  10. +4
    8 June 2012 11: 52
    The car in a capital letter at the service liked the night shooting beauty indescribable pillar of fire article plus
  11. +2
    8 June 2012 13: 33
    A true delight when I watched her "work".
    1. mox
      mox
      +3
      8 June 2012 20: 32
      Observe one thing and shoot ... good
  12. +3
    8 June 2012 14: 06
    when it was a formidable weapon --- in Vietnam they should have erected a monument to her, how much she had lowered to the ground (very happy about this). it was replaced by a worthy technique - the Shell complex (I hope he will wait for his amer)
    1. Denzel13
      +2
      8 June 2012 15: 02
      Exactly, for every NATO aircraft on the shell, S-400, etc. depending on the weight category. wassat
    2. Optics
      +2
      9 June 2012 17: 34
      And why once? For the first time, I came across Shilka closely in 1982, the year 406 of the Tamanskaya motorized road division. A MACHINE!
      This, albeit outdated today, must be kept! This is the Kalashnikov ground defense!
      And he did not believe, but he saw: he didn’t hit the armor on the tanks, but the hinged cuts, and inside the tower the inner hinged and fragments of the armor fly to dust. Strong car.
  13. +3
    8 June 2012 16: 02
    Without any exaggeration, the legendary and well-deserved car! If you believe some sources (by the way!), Then on the combat account of "Shilka" is the very first shot down in the history of the F-117A. First Gulf War, year 1991, ZSU-23-4 of the Iraqi army ... Such is the case ...
    To the author - a huge respect. The material is excellent. Plus with pleasure ... smile

    And for lovers of military art - a winter landscape with "Shilka" ... smile
    1. ICT
      +1
      8 June 2012 17: 15
      from ground operations, support for the alpha group during the assault on Amin’s palace



      when creating, the designers’s idea of ​​placing artillery and radar was interesting (why abandoned the trunks spaced along the sides and, as a result, where to put the antenna)
  14. +2
    8 June 2012 19: 56
    And what can the comrades from Israel say about the attempt to bomb the Aswan Dam covered by Shilki ...
    1. 0
      9 June 2012 02: 40
      Have there been such attempts?
  15. mox
    mox
    +10
    8 June 2012 20: 26
    Everyone praised. I will not repeat myself. Shilka is a part of my life.
    Throw a fly in the ointment.
    1. Weak engine. 260 l / s per 21 tons is very small. In fact, already in the early 80s, she could not keep up with the tanks. At all exercises, the silk was on the defensive, Strela-10 and the MANPADS battery (on BMP-2) went on the offensive.
    2. PKK on the lamps. A lot of space. Fine tuning of the station gets lost after a short march. Before shooting, you need to sit for hours with a screwdriver set up.
    3. GTE as an onboard power supply drive. Eats a lot - 96 l / h. Damage due to cutting of the generator drive roller (especially in young mechanical drives). Well, the visibility in the infrared hoo.
    4. Lack of basic comfort.
    In contrast: excellent hydraulic drive, reliable machines, a good projectile.
  16. mox
    mox
    0
    8 June 2012 21: 10
    [img = left] http://pzaku.net/foto/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=436
    0 & g2_serialNumber = 2 [/ img]
    [img] http://pzaku.net/foto/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=4363&g2_
    serialNumber = 2 [/ img]

    [img] http://pzaku.net/foto/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=4375&g2_
    serialNumber = 2 [/ img]
  17. Russian sniper
    +2
    8 June 2012 21: 35
    It seems to me that it is still relevant for protecting small objects from helicopters and drones, and if you attach 8 "Eagle" pieces to it, then it is generally priceless on the battlefield good
  18. prispek
    +1
    8 June 2012 22: 32
    Without exaggeration, the legendary car. During the urgent I heard only good and in excellent shape about her. The officers said that the shilka would easily stop the tank. It is a rare case when the phrase "has no analogues" is appropriate and well deserved.
    1. +1
      9 June 2012 19: 55
      Quote: prispek
      has no analogues "appropriate
      1. prispek
        -1
        12 June 2012 01: 22
        What kind of miraculous judo? Compared with the TTX shilka, in terms of efficiency, in terms of distribution?
        1. 0
          12 June 2012 01: 31
          There is such a miracle. The rest of the questions do not fit into the criterion --- analogue.
          1. prispek
            -1
            12 June 2012 02: 06
            And what does it fit? The presence of a caterpillar track and anti-aircraft gun?
            1. 0
              12 June 2012 10: 35
              There is no desire to teach you, anyway, you do not learn new information. Otherwise, you yourself would have guessed that the ZSU is a combination of an anti-aircraft gun and a chassis.
              1. prispek
                +1
                13 June 2012 23: 59
                Quote: Kars
                There is no desire to teach you

                Well, it doesn't matter. The main thing. that the desire to teach is unabated. And where did you get the idea that I am not assimilating new information? You yourself have admitted that: "the ways of your thinking are inscrutable."
                And I'm sitting here, learning. An analogue is an object (technical solution) of the same purpose, similar in combination of essential features. Right? But I didn’t just ask about TTX and efficiency. After all, if you remove these issues, then any anti-aircraft guns on a self-propelled chassis can be called the analogue of the shilka. For example, SU-7 1935. And what? Do you have an anti-aircraft gun? There is! On the chassis? Ka-anechna! Well, here's the analogue for me. By the way, I’m ignorant! I’ll be smarter.
                1. prispek
                  -1
                  14 June 2012 01: 18
                  Sorry - the typo is not SU-7, but SU-6 of course.
                2. 0
                  14 June 2012 18: 37
                  Quote: prispek
                  For example SU-7 1935

                  years do not match
                  Quote: prispek
                  But I didn’t just ask about TTX and efficiency.

                  But why?
                  Quote: prispek
                  Well, here's my analog
                  Correctly, therefore it is not necessary to declare that there are no analogues.

                  but my example is all the same closer to ZSU-4-23 and this can be seen with the naked eye and does not require special explanation.
                  1. prispek
                    0
                    14 June 2012 23: 00
                    So I wonder if you read the posts completely or diagonally? Or maybe you break the post into separate sentences and perceive each without a semantic connection with the future and the next? No, really, I wonder how the great brain works?
                    Quote: Kars
                    years do not match

                    So after all, that's the same! In the next post, just below, well, have you noticed? Now we read: "a typo - not the SU-7, but the SU-6 of course." Well that's just wonderful .
                    Quote: Kars
                    But why?

                    And then: “my example is nearer to the ZSU-4-23, and this can be seen with the naked eye and does not require any special explanations.” Requires, O greatest, and therefore asked. You ask me to substantiate the obvious questions. Or is it God’s, and Caesar’s Caesar’s? No, this is better: "Every cricket know your six!" Well then, what are you wasting time with me here? Are you asserting yourself? In vain. I already wrote to you - enough simplicity for every sage. And your bloopers are visible to me no less than my ignorance to you. Yes, I know, "an example, so as not to look unfounded" Please; "Correctly, not Vitman" "These blond Aryan knights ... look the same to me" Somehow, these statements do not fit with the reputation of the best specialist in BTT on the site. Tanks do not look one to you, and the people who fought on them (even if they were enemies) are not even known to you. I understand the costs of being passionate about technology, and yet, still ...
                    1. -1
                      14 June 2012 23: 23
                      Quote: prispek
                      So I wonder if you read the posts completely or diagonally?

                      And how are you? And where is the Su-7 Su-6? They are not of that time period than the ZSU-4-23
                      unlike my candidate.
                      Quote: prispek
                      So after all, that's the same! In the next post, just below, well, have you noticed? Now we read: "a typo - not the SU-7, but the SU-6 of course." well that's just wonderful

                      Funny.
                      Quote: prispek
                      It requires, oh the greatest, therefore requires and asked

                      What you do not know the approximate rate of rotor guns?
                      Quote: prispek
                      Or is God divine, and Caesar is Caesar?

                      Ostap suffered?

                      Quote: prispek
                      Correctly, not Vitman "" These blond Aryan knights ... look the same to me "Somehow, these statements do not fit with the reputation of the best specialist in BTT on the site. Tanks are not like one person, but people who fought on them

                      That's right, tanks are not the same for me.
                      Also, I myself brought in a photo of Wittman which for some reason does not seem to be near the tank with the crew --- so call me you can sign someone --- I personally got this picture not in the context of Wittman, but 102 TB
                    2. Stary oper
                      0
                      20 September 2012 23: 30
                      prispek
                      It's nice to see an ironic person ... :) Respect.
  19. Stasi.
    +4
    8 June 2012 23: 45
    Even old Shilka can serve quite well if they are modernized. They protect well not only from air strikes but also from enemy ambushes. I am for giving Shilka a new life and keeping them in order.
  20. 0
    9 June 2012 02: 12
    “In the 1982 year, when there was a Lebanese war, I was on a business trip to Syria. At that time, Israel made serious attempts to strike at troops stationed in the Bekaa Valley. I remember that immediately after the raid, Soviet specialists brought the wreckage of the F-16 aircraft, the most modern at that time, shot down by Shilka.

    There were no F-16s shot down in 1982. Or "Phantom" or "Kfir".

    It is appropriate to say here: Israeli intelligence sniffed out that the Arabs first used Shilka back in 1973. Then the Israelis quickly planned an operation to seize Soviet-made ZSU and successfully carried out it.

    About the year 1973 is unknown. At least 9 in 1982 were captured as trophies in Lebanon.

    Israeli ZSU-23-4 at the Negev training ground; side of the tower - air conditioning
    1. Corporal
      0
      1 July 2012 16: 12
      And the refrigerator with "COCA-COLA" probably fit inside?
  21. +2
    9 June 2012 13: 43
    Air conditioning is cool :)
    1. NikifOR
      0
      16 June 2012 06: 05
      Air conditioning in those places the actual thing
  22. +2
    9 June 2012 15: 58
    In 81, after training, he served in the Mongolian People's Republic in an anti-aircraft missile brigade (Krug system). I heard a conversation between a sergeant and his subordinate, who came running from combat positions (the divisions were on combat duty every month) about some of their business, and the sergeant asked him what and how. And in the meantime, the soldier said that there was some kind of MiG lying around (as I later found out the MiG-23). To the question, "What is he doing there finally?", He said that the MiG did not answer "friend or foe" and "Shilka" flunked him when he was at an altitude of 1,5 km (then China was the most likely friend) ... For some reason, there was no ZSU 23-4 in the brigade. All equipment in the position was covered by ZU 23-2 (according to the state), the equipment is good, but not sufficient to cover the divisions. Perhaps our fathers-commanders agreed with the fathers-commanders of the infantry regiment, where these "Shilki" were. Such is the plot from my life and I saw "Shilka" only once during my entire service.
  23. berimor
    +5
    10 June 2012 16: 26
    I am a participant in the hostilities in Egypt in 1970-1971 as part of the Soviet 18th special-purpose anti-aircraft missile division (operation "KAVKAZ"). There, each S-125 anti-aircraft missile division for cover was assigned an air defense platoon consisting of 3 - 4 "shilok" and several crews of "Strela-2" MANPADS. The main task of the shiloks was to cover the S-125 air defense missile system in the "dead funnel", and the Strela-2 MANPADS was not so much to shoot down the Jewish foe (although there was such a thing), but to force him to climb higher for earlier detection. And these calculations were exhibited in the direction of the alleged airstrike. Well, this is already a matter of tactics. And the weapon is really good. For example, General Designer Arrows was awarded the highest award of Egypt "Blue Nile Necklace"! And on my second trip to Syria during the October 1973 war, I became convinced of its effectiveness.
    1. 0
      13 August 2012 17: 09
      Good time of day, Vladimir. I also served in the 18th Air Defense Division HE in 1970-1971. It is possible that we could meet somewhere: in Cairo-West, in Giza or in Dakhshur. If it does not bother you, write me in a personal, I will tell you my coordinates.
  24. wind force
    -2
    23 June 2012 19: 00
    great car
  25. Pripyatchanin
    +1
    23 June 2012 22: 01
    Strength But time takes its toll
  26. Corporal
    0
    1 July 2012 16: 14
    I think it’s too early to write off such a car. She will prove herself properly more than once.
  27. 0
    4 July 2012 17: 41
    yes, the current can be used to gate the target for 20 km; and hit just 2km (for new ones and for old without a thorough repair, even less); Amer aircraft by the beam spot the strobing; against turntables if you throw out radar (interference) you can fight
  28. 0
    14 July 2012 12: 32
    The funniest thing is that just such "primitive shooters" with visual guidance on targets can be most effective in case of war, even if the minimum of electronics they have will be impossible to use for various reasons (interference, etc.)
  29. +1
    31 January 2013 03: 54
    WHAT IS THE MOST INTERESTING, ANALOG ELECTRON-MECHANICAL SOLVING DEVICE STANDS ON ITS FIRST MODIFICATIONS TO CALCULATE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PURPOSE AND GUIDANCE TO THE PURPOSE. THIS THIS DINOSAUR KILLED THE AMERICANS AND INTRODUCED THEM INTO THE STOUP, THEY CANNOT DECIPE ITS BATTLE ALGORITHM ...))) THEREFORE, HAD LOOKED FOR MORE LATE EXCEPTIONS))) )

    PS RUSSIANS DO NOT GIVE UP !!!
  30. kig
    0
    15 February 2018 15: 56
    I understood correctly - the author wants to tell us that the B-52 in the Gulf was bombed almost from a low-flying flight? Otherwise, how would Shilka get them? Sorry, I do not believe.

    3 February 1991 - B-52G "Stratofortress" (ser. Number 59-2593, 4300-e temporary bomber wing of the US Air Force). Fell into the Indian Ocean near Diego Garcia Island after a power failure, returning from a sortie. Of the 6 crew, 3 crew died during the bailout. It is considered a non-combat loss, although there were suggestions that the combat damage was the cause of the system failure.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"