The flight of the UAV on liquid hydrogen

13
The flight of the UAV on liquid hydrogen

The new unmanned aerial vehicle of the Boeing company, called the Phantom Eye, made the first flight, which ended, in general, successfully, despite the fact that there was a rather hard landing and the landing gear was broken.

Start drone took place last Friday at 6:22 am with aviation NASA "Edwards", located in the state of California (USA). Despite the fact that the Phantom Eye flight could theoretically last for four days without refueling, this time the flight lasted only twenty eight minutes, and took place at altitudes that do not exceed 1200 meters, and at a limited speed of 115 km / h.



Unlike the American company Lockheed Martin, which succeeded in developing and building a large unmanned aerial vehicle with a fixed wing, but then rejected by the Air Force and the United States Army, representatives of Boeing believe that they will succeed. Indeed, the use of liquid hydrogen (it is twice as large as oil products by specific energy intensity) as a fuel enables the scout to be in the air for up to ninety-six hours, compared to thirty-six for Lockheed Martin's RQ-4 Global Hawk. At the same time, the dimensions of the structure are titanic, as evidenced by the wingspan of the Phantom Eye, which is 76,25 meters, as well as the payload in 203 kilograms. The ceiling of this giant reaches twenty kilometers, and cruising speed reaches 278 km / h.




An empty drone weighs 3390 kilograms, which is also a record for a device that has such dimensions. This was possible due to the fact that carbon fiber was used in the construction, as well as due to the absence of a heavy chassis. This drone does not have a conventional chassis, but there is a special launch system consisting of a four-wheel trolley that accelerates the aircraft to 55 km / h. Such a system eliminates the unmanned aerial vehicle from the need to carry extra load in the form of a powerful chassis. Landing is carried out on the side supports and lightweight front wheel.

However, it was this trigger system that caused one of the aircraft racks to dive into the bottom of the lake when landing, which served as the runway. When landing on concrete, of course, this would not have happened. However, now the possibility of landing and taking off from unpaved airfields, which was previously announced by the developers, is somewhat doubtful. Yes, and it is unlikely that what happened was the only hitch in the autonomous first flight, since it was supposed to last from 2's to 4's hours, and it ended in less than thirty minutes, although Boeing did not report the reasons for the “short program.”



In fact, future prospects associated with the development of an aircraft-type reconnaissance drone are also overshadowed by competitors. The British airship LEMV, which one of these days will begin to pass tests, is capable of burying the project, since this aircraft can be in the air for twenty one days. Since neither LEMV, nor the Phantom Eye can be used against a well-armed country, the Phantom Eye's large ceiling most likely will not help it defeat the aeronautical competitor. In addition, diesel fuel used by airship engines is much cheaper than liquid hydrogen consumed by the Phantom Eye.

However, not only new aircraft are insured against breakdowns. Therefore, it is worth waiting for the completion of tests of a competing airship.

Prepared by materials Boeing и compulenta.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    13 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. Igor
      +3
      7 June 2012 09: 08
      4 days without refueling! How we lagged behind the Americans in the field of UAVs.
      1. +2
        7 June 2012 09: 16
        UAV ... a sore subject,
        1. +6
          7 June 2012 10: 52
          Here it is an alternative to oil. Electric cars, hydrogen on hydrogen. However, we live in an interesting time.
          1. Aleksey67
            +2
            7 June 2012 11: 55
            Quote: professor
            Here it is an alternative to oil.

            Just a slogan. While there is no particular alternative to oil, except gas winked
            Quote: professor
            Electric cars

            Battery disposal and intermittent expensive replacement makes them uneconomical smile
            Quote: professor
            Hydrogen aircraft

            I wonder how with security? An UAV will explode and to hell with it, but a passenger?
            Quote: professor
            However, we live in an interesting time.

            I agree smile
            1. -1
              7 June 2012 12: 34
              While there is no particular alternative to oil, except gas
              In which industry?
              Battery disposal and intermittent expensive replacement makes them uneconomical
              Question Series
              An UAV will explode and to hell with it, but a passenger?
              Does kerosene not explode here?
              1. postman
                0
                12 June 2012 22: 13
                Quote: leon-iv
                In which industry?

                In all + in transport
                Quote: leon-iv
                Question Series

                accumulators and batteries (batteries) it "does not save".
                high cost and low temperature range
                Quote: leon-iv
                Does kerosene not explode here?

                and what is an explosive mixture?
                the state of aggregation of kerosene and hydrogen at t = 20g.
                Flash point?
                compare kerosene and hydrogen like a finger and its antipode
            2. -1
              7 June 2012 14: 08
              There is an alternative (I am silent about atomic energy in general), hydrogen, biofuel, etc.

              Battery disposal and intermittent expensive replacement makes them uneconomical

              You tell this to millions of customers who successfully use electric cars and hybrids. In the near future, there will be more.
              http://www.betterplace.com/

              I wonder how with security?

              Aviation kerosene is also not at all safer, but everyone uses it. wink
              1. ICT
                0
                7 June 2012 18: 53
                IT WAS AUTO AND WENT ON THE WOOD AND NOTHING
                the main thing in these things is the infrastructure, here with the union we had only one gas station to the city, and now they are on every corner that's the whole story,
              2. postman
                0
                12 June 2012 22: 41
                Quote: professor
                You tell this to millions of customers who successfully use electric cars and hybrids.

                electric cars - while exotic, no millions, thousands of power (including golfers)
                hybrids 0 for 2012 decline of orders by 20% compared to 2011.
                more than 43% (if I’m not mistaken) of owners of hybrid cars; when changing cars, they choose the traditional one, abandoning the hybrid
            3. Liliputin
              -1
              7 June 2012 21: 33
              Quote: Aleksey67
              While there is no particular alternative to oil, except gas

              For example, shale - which is immeasurable throughout the world ...
        2. borkovn
          +1
          7 June 2012 18: 42
          Of course a sore subject. But it does not concern the USA and Israel, but all the rest.
      2. beard999
        +1
        7 June 2012 14: 47
        Quote: Igorek
        How did we lag behind the Americans in the field of UAV

        Left behind, of course. In the field of creation and practical application of UAVs, the whole world lagged behind the USA in general. Moreover, the hydrogen theme has nothing to do with this lag. Back in 1982, in the N. Kuznetsov Design Bureau, hydrogen aircraft engines were developed that underwent bench and flight tests. But that's not the point. There are quite a lot of obstacles to the widespread use of hydrogen. Hydrogen is stored in a liquefied, adsorbed or compressed gaseous state. The main problems that need to be solved when developing hydrogen storage technologies are related to ensuring their profitability and safety, which is directly related to the chemical and physical properties of hydrogen.
        After the disaster of the Hindenburg airship, hydrogen is considered a dangerous fuel. A mixture of hydrogen and air is an explosive. Hydrogen is more dangerous than gasoline, since it burns in a mixture with air in a wider range of concentrations. Gasoline does not burn with lambda less than 0,5 and more than 2, hydrogen at these ratios burns perfectly.
        A hydrogen power plant based on a traditional ICE is much more complicated and more expensive to maintain than a conventional ICE. According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the operation of a hydrogen car at this stage in the development of hydrogen technology is 100 (!!!) times more expensive than gasoline.
        The volatility of hydrogen is the highest among gases, so hydrogen is difficult to store in liquid form, which makes it difficult to store hydrogen, transport, and use in a tank.
        The cost of gas stations with liquid hydrogen will be significantly more expensive than the cost of equipment for gasoline gas stations. (For example, according to GM, the construction of 12 thousand hydrogen gas stations in 2005 was estimated at $ 12 billion, i.e. $ 1 million per gas station, while the set of equipment for gasoline gas stations is 150 thousand).
        And hydrogen fuel is by no means cheap, 8 euros per kilogram, which in terms of gasoline equivalent is 2,7 euros per liter.
        On trifles there is still much that can be scraped against hydrogen fuel. Hydrogen as fuel was spoken even before WWII, but during this time it was not widely used. This in itself says a lot.
    2. +1
      7 June 2012 11: 19
      Since neither LEMV nor Phantom Eye can be used against a well-armed country .......

      These are all said.
    3. Yoke
      +2
      7 June 2012 11: 48
      Peppy Sausage)
    4. Dust
      0
      7 June 2012 11: 50
      Technically, one more serious step has been taken, but practically? Well, let it fly so much (although, as it turned out, it does not fly yet), but at what speed? Well, and how much will he pilit to his destination, especially if no one allows him to place another base very close to his borders or even on his territory? And isn't the hydrogen tank on the territory of such a base too loud, if that?
      1. Liliputin
        +2
        7 June 2012 21: 36
        Quote: Dust
        Technically, one more serious step has been taken, but practically? Well, let it fly so much (although, as it turned out, it does not fly yet), but at what speed? Well, and how much will he be sawing to his destination, especially if no one allows him to place another base very close to his borders or even on his territory?

        Here the question is the purpose of the device. Apparently - it is reconnaissance, not shock - and for such UAVs, speed is not the main thing. It is important for them to hang for a long time over the reconnaissance object and monitor its movements. It is here that the flight time is important!
    5. lotus04
      +1
      7 June 2012 14: 34
      Good target.
    6. vylvyn
      0
      8 June 2012 18: 46
      Everything is clear with take-off, but what about landing? Amerikosy, ay, how will you substitute the wheels under your airship?
    7. postman
      0
      12 June 2012 23: 16
      An empty drone weighs 3390 kilograms, which is also a record for an apparatus having such dimensions. This became possible due to the fact that carbon fiber was used in the design, as well as due to lack of heavy chassis.
      RQ-4 Global Hawk =4177 kg WITH A HEAVY CHASSIS!

      RQ-4 Global HawkMaximum take-off weight, kg: 11622,
      Fuel mass, kg: 6583, Flight duration, h: 38, Maximum speed, km / h: 639, Payload, kg: 863

      Boeing phantom eyeMaximum take-off weight, kg: ND,
      Fuel mass, kg: nd, Flight duration, h: up to 90, Maximum speed, km / h: 277, Payload, kg: 204-227

      morale: RQ-4 Global Hawk without a heavy chassis, with a similar payload (4,2 times less), at an economical speed (2,3 times less) WILL SHOW THE SAME RESULTS and for less money. It will not look like a "flying canister" ..

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"