Old World builds new fighters. 1 part

24
"Promising aviation combat system ”(Future Combat Air System - FCAS) is now for Germany and France the most modern vision of its own fighter. The German Air Force is currently armed with obsolete Tornado fighter-bombers, which are constantly short of spare parts. The Germans would be happy to get rid of them, but only Tornado are capable of carrying B61 ​​nuclear bombs, which are deployed in the country at the kind request of the United States. And the decommissioning of aircraft is just around the corner - in 2025 all Tornado should retire. The option of replacing with Eurofighter Typhoon can only partially save the situation - certification for equipping nuclear bombs will take several years. Therefore, the most logical step on the part of the Luftwaffe is the purchase of fifth-generation F-35 cars from overseas friends. Several generals from the Air Force advocate for this, but the Ministry of Defense and the government are not enthusiastic about such an initiative. As a result, in May 2018, Lieutenant General Karl Müller lost the post of commander of the country's air force for his public statements in favor of the F-35.

Old World builds new fighters. 1 part

Luftwaffe Commander Lt. Gen. Karl Mülner, fired for lobbying for F-35



The concept of the Future Combat Air System was first published in the Combat Aviation Development Strategy, published by the German Ministry of Defense in May 2016. One of the components of FCAS was the “Next Generation Weapon System or NextGen WS”, as well as variants of manned and unmanned systems. It is worth a little distraction and tell how the FCAS program began. The abbreviation itself appeared in 2001 in the working papers of the European Technology Development Program ETAP (European Technology Acquisition Program). The six participating countries - France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom agreed to exchange technologies and create joint prototypes. Later, under the flag of FCAS in Europe, several national aviation programs were launched at different times. In 2009, this abbreviation was the name of the project to replace Rafale after 2030. And in 2012, the English-French program from BAE Systems and Dassault Aviation for the development of an airline complex based on technology demonstrators Taranis and nEUROn appeared under the code FCAS. Plans for the UK to leave the European Union put a cross on the project with a full freeze of funding.


The conceptual appearance of the fighter FCAS

Let's go back to the original FCAS. Airbus is working on the concept of the new fighter. His management prefers the manned version of the NextGen WS. The main argument against drones is the impossibility of achieving satisfactory autonomy parameters by 2030-2040. As a result, the main layout concept of the program is a two-seat aircraft, the crew of which is represented by a pilot and an operator. drone. Airbus conceived within the framework of FCAS the concept of using a strike complex in the form of a "swarm" (swarm), which includes both manned vehicles and UAVs. In accordance with this idea, the main load will be borne by inexpensive and simple unmanned "mules" equipped with sensors and weapons, as well as connected by secure information channels. The engineers chose an intermediate strike group control scheme, not yet unmanned (the operator is nearby in a fighter), but not manned either (attacks are mainly delivered by UAVs). On July 13, 2017, the leaders of the two countries, Germany and France, agreed on plans to jointly develop a new European fighter on the fields of the Franco-German Council in Paris. And on November 8, 2017, Airbus DS Strategy Director Antoine Noguier presented the updated Future Air Power fighter concept. It is interesting that this time the new car is designed not as a replacement for the Tornado, but as a successor to the Typhoon, that is, it should appear in 2045. At the presentation, the new aircraft was trivially called the "new fighter" (New Fighter) and left in a two-seat configuration. The whole set of a gentleman of generations 5-6 is present here in abundance - both stealth, and supersonic as a cruising mode, and the presence of sensor drones going ahead.


New Fighter Vision from Airbus DS


The HASP (High-Altitude Pseudo-Satellite) pseudospat of Zephir type is one of the members of the New Fighter team.


A400M resets the Remote Carriers group of drones to aid New Fighter to suppress the air defense system.


Astrobus is one of the components that ensures the shock group’s awareness of the combat situation.

The highlights of the New Fighter platform should be a new system for conducting reconnaissance, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR - Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance), as well as communication equipment with "pseudo-satellites" HASP (High-Altitude Pseudo-Satellite) of the Zephir type. HASP is designed to provide the fighter with information from its airborne radars, scanning the battlefield from high altitudes. The most interesting thing is that a transport A400M was also added to this company, which will carry reconnaissance and strike UAVs (Remote Carriers - remotely controlled carriers) in its womb. This technique will be involved in the event of a collision of fighters with a serious enemy air defense system. Suppress her Drones will be according to the mentioned "swarm" scheme, along with the New Fighter fighter, which will conduct the overall coordination of the action. Part of the drones from the "swarm" will be engaged in electronic warfare, part will directly hit air defense objects, clearing the way for manned equipment. People from Airbus have not forgotten about the AWACS aircraft based on their own A330, which in this topic plays the role of a signal repeater from satellites on the Astrobus platform.


Future Air Power concept with Airbus New Fighter fighter


Network interaction of the structure revolving around New Fighter

The following informational occasion to recall the future of the European fighter was an interview with the head of Airbus DS to the French newspaper Les Echos, in which he mentioned that “a joint Franco-German project provides a unique opportunity to promote rapprochement of European countries. France and Germany should be leaders in such a union, inviting other European states to join them, who wish it. ” Dirk Hoke rightly noted that the content of three Rafale, Typhoon and Tornado fighters at once is too expensive for Europe and every effort should be made to develop a unified platform of the future. Moreover, Hawke added: “Given the old models, in the EU countries, there are currently more than 20 types of fighters - this is a completely abnormal situation.” Let us rephrase the words of the head of Airbus: Europeans need a single plane of the fifth or sixth generation, and it is very desirable that it be an Airbus. In an interview that dates back to 27 November 2017, Hoke recalled that the road map for the new fighter should have been ready by June 2018. According to Les Echos, the deadlines could not be met, as the leadership of the Federal Republic of Germany was distracted from the topic of a promising fighter, focusing on the problems of forming the government of the country. The start of 2018 of the year also did not go without discussing the idea of ​​New Fighter, only this time the interview was given by the head of Dassault Aviation Eric Trappier. In his speech for the German weekly Wirtschaftswoche, he smashed the idea of ​​buying F-35 by Europe: “I don’t think that European countries will be able to contribute to the strategic autonomy of Europe by purchasing a finished American product.” It would be strange to hear something else from the head of a large European engineering company. Trappier also indicated that only Dassault Aviation is capable of making an effective sixth generation fighter for Europe, as it has exceptional competencies in this area. At the same time, at the official level, Airbus DS is the leading developer of the machine, and the French are content with the role of the slave.


Conclusion of an agreement between Airbus DS and Dassault Aviation on the joint development of a new generation fighter

Despite the controversy, in April 2018, the heads of Airbus DS and Dassault Aviation officially announced an agreement to develop a new generation of machines. Dirk Hoke said pathetically about this: “Never before has Europe been so determined to ensure and strengthen its autonomy and independence in the defense sector, both from a political and an industrial point of view. Airbus DS and Dassault Aviation are two companies with the best knowledge that will be required to implement the FCAS project. ” The Airbus DS boss summed up the words that the European novelty will not copy the F-35, but will step further.

To be continued ...

According to the materials of the publication "Rise".
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 December 2018 06: 47
    I did not understand one thing: tactically, why is it necessary to develop a super-expensive intermediary between drones and "ordinary" manned aircraft going into the airspace already cleared of threats? If drones are unable to provide threat suppression, I doubt even 7-8-9 ... will be safe. And if the drones will clear everything and will patrol and quickly suppress the hidden air defense points, then why fence the garden?
    So they would say in a simple way, they say, the 10th apple-tree has already come out and we still don’t come to face with the old Nokia ...
    1. 0
      20 December 2018 06: 52
      This is more of an additional feature. In the end, this aircraft and itself will need to complete the tasks, but such an opportunity will allow the delegation of a significant number of tasks to drones and significantly expand its capabilities as a combat unit.
      1. 0
        20 December 2018 07: 01
        These are drones now - only an additional function, but in the long term - all the suppression of electronic warfare / air defense / missile defense (as conceived by tactics):
        A part of the drones from the “swarm” will be occupied by electronic warfare, a part will directly hit air defense objects, clearing the way for manned vehicles.

        Why reinvent the wheel if a red carpet is laid in front of you and a maid with webs creates comfort on the sides? Isn't it better to concentrate on ensuring safety with the help of the same drones, and for manned aircraft to leave purely transport functions in a safe airspace?
        1. 0
          23 December 2018 09: 14
          Isn't it better to concentrate on ensuring safety with the help of the same drones, and for manned aircraft to leave purely transport functions in a safe airspace?

          It may be so someday, but as long as the UAV’s autonomy is extremely small, it is not possible to entrust the vehicles with military missions on their own in the foreseeable future, and indeed the big question is how much is needed and the communication channels are completely unprepared for this. Drones will most likely be able to execute a set of scenarios for various tactical tasks, and the operator to issue orders - for now, this would be a significant breakthrough.
          1. +1
            28 January 2019 19: 59
            Vse pishut o drone, or lutshe samalet chem IPhone, No zdes vse yasno, shish vam pindosi, Mi svabodnaya evropa i budem stroit Severni potok 2, Nam nenujni F35 or jjijani Gas. I vse. Who is neponyal? Evropa budet drujit s Rassii esli budet nezavisima, a tak iskustvenno budet vrajdavat. Malatci Nemtci i Frantcuzi.
  2. +3
    10 December 2018 07: 59
    And which concept will win in the end ???
    Those. manned aircraft or drone? "Invisible" or nimble, powerful, twist - twirl, overtake everyone? Wagon or specially for one time?
    All the same, you can’t keep track of design nonsense-d-fantasies, but a real battle brings in and puts an end to E !!!
    1. +1
      11 December 2018 13: 26
      In the end, the "universal ultrasonic missile" concept that can be launched in any conditions, from any carrier, to any targets and to any range will win. In the distant future, such a concept as a combat aircraft will cease to exist, well, except perhaps for museums
      1. 0
        11 December 2018 13: 33
        In the distant future, we ourselves will fly like Icarus !!!
        While doing that, sho is now relevant and effective.
        And to dream? Well, boom and dream, fantasize! The universe and fantasy are endless!
  3. +1
    10 December 2018 11: 08
    hover like Indians, paint more pictures, and buy the F-35, when they still become cheaper as mass increases.
    1. 0
      11 December 2018 13: 28
      Do not buy. Europe (except for the sixes of the United States as small Britain, Poland and the Baltic states) is withdrawing from the influence of pndostana. 20 years in world geopolitics for amers will be comparable to 90 years for the USSR / RF
  4. +2
    10 December 2018 13: 00
    The future belongs to unmanned combat platforms connected into a single combat group. This also applies to armored vehicles. The pilot-controlled unit is yesterday and not the future generation.
  5. 0
    10 December 2018 18: 48
    Most clever: still buy the F-35, study them thoroughly and come up with how and what to improve. Because Europeans have no experience with stealth, with stealth coatings, air radars are lagging behind, there is no network awareness system. It is logical to learn all this from the F-35. Otherwise, the invention of the bicycle. And then - do it! Both the French and the Germans, I have no doubt, have creative engineers.
    1. 0
      11 December 2018 13: 28
      F-35 - expensive trash. And one thing for research pndosy not sell
      1. +1
        11 December 2018 13: 47
        Quote: Hypersound
        F-35 - expensive trash.

        No, not trash, no - not expensive.
      2. 0
        11 December 2018 14: 17
        F-35 is one and a half times cheaper than Typhoon-Eurofighter.
        1. 0
          20 December 2018 07: 11
          You forget to add to the readers that the price for it is a direct analogy with the price of contracts for American LNG with a "cheap" price at the hub, where the rest of the other and considerable costs are simply not announced. Well, as if a Bugatti Veyron was sold to you "cheap" and the dealer did not announce the cost of future expenses for gasoline and maintenance))) Just risk your health, look for how much Israel has already paid for the restoration of the "stealth" -coating of existing F-35i ...
  6. 0
    11 December 2018 08: 51
    Somehow they were slightly late with the idea of ​​creating a 5-6 generation. The USA / Russia / China has already fully embarked on the wing. And the Europeans have only a protocol of intent to create something there on the basis of the Airbus. Nude Nude. Given the fact that Macron introduced martial law in a la Belle France, let's see how it turns out ..
    1. 0
      11 December 2018 13: 29
      Europe is not the same
    2. 0
      11 December 2018 16: 47
      Only the United States became winged.
  7. 0
    11 December 2018 13: 21
    Why throw a ton of money down the drain? Buy magnificent Su-57 for a very modest price, also save on development. And in the future, they are ready to sell to the Germans simply phenomenal Mig-41 5 generations with a maximum speed of Mach 4-4.5. For now, you can take on cheap and excellent Su-34 bombers, a bit later even a 5th generation scorer can be washed down and sold if there is interest
  8. -1
    11 December 2018 13: 24
    Why this expensive rubbish, even spend money on the development of wagons. Take the magnificent and cheap Su-57, and in the future the phenomenal MiG-41 with a maximum speed of Mach 4-4.5. We also offer excellent Su-34, and in the future also stealth bombers of the Su-56 type from a warehouse in Moscow or by pickup
    1. +2
      11 December 2018 13: 48
      Quote: Hypersound
      Why this expensive rubbish, even spend money on the development of wagons. Take the magnificent and cheap Su-57, and in the future the phenomenal MiG-41 with a maximum speed of Mach 4-4.5. We also offer excellent Su-34, and in the future also stealth bombers of the Su-56 type from a warehouse in Moscow or by pickup

      Tell me why so much nonsense in one little comment
  9. +1
    12 February 2019 09: 15
    Too complicated and overloaded scheme. With active electronic warfare of air defense from drones, there will not be much sense. This is already clear, especially since anti-drone systems based on fiber masers are not developed except in Africa. As a result, again everything comes down to the development of a multipurpose projectile.
    1. 0
      18 February 2019 14: 14
      Quote: shinobi
      Too complicated and overloaded scheme.


      The channels for receiving information on drones are duplicated (they are exactly at the forefront of the attack, and not
      “Perspective aviation combat system” from the article) and for different tasks, only the necessary method of obtaining information will probably be used