A new version of the AK-12 for the special forces units will soon appear.

69
A new version of the AK-12 for the special forces units will soon appear.


NPO "Izhmash" is going to develop a modification of the new Kalashnikov AK-12 assault rifle, which will most closely correspond to the special forces units. According to the press service of the company, a sample of such a machine will be presented in the fall of this year, according to RIA News.

On Saturday, Vladimir Zlobin, Chief Designer of Izhmash, presented AK-12 at a meeting in which an interagency working group with the Military Industrial Commission under the Russian government participated. After the presentation of the machine, all members of the working group, including representatives of the Ministry of Defense, the FSB and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, were able to experience weapon during demonstration shooting.

During the tests, experts noted that this machine gun showed itself more stably during firing compared to samples of previous generations (when firing, less recoil, when firing with a burst, the machine takes less). Meanwhile, there have been various additions and suggestions related to its refinement, which are particularly relevant for special purpose units.

According to the press service, on the basis of the proposals made, Vladimir Zlobin promised to develop a new version of AK-12, which will meet the needs of the special forces as much as possible. An inter-agency working group will be able to see this sample this fall.

In addition to AK-12, NPO Izhmash demonstrated to the participants of the working group a new modification of the Saygi-12, which was developed for the Federation of Practical Shooting of the Russian Federation. The experts and sportsmen present at the shooting highly appreciated the smooth-bore carbine, many wanted to buy it.

In August last year, the Izhmash design and technology center began work on the creation of the AK-12, and in December the first sample of this machine was ready. In this weapon, it was possible to realize new design and technological solutions, thanks to which the combat power and effectiveness of firing increased.

The new machine is distinguished by improved ergonomics; Picatinny trims appeared in its design, which are special mounting devices designed for mounting collimator and night sights, riflescopes, target indicators and range finders, which makes effective use of weapons at any time of day. In addition, the machine is equipped with a folding telescopic butt, height-adjustable lining and butt plate.

At the AK-12, the reloading handle is installed both on the left and on the right, thanks to which both right-handed and left-handed can use this weapon. With all this, AK-12 continues to be automatic, reliable, durable and easy to use. By the end of this year, the factory tests of the modification of the new machine gun will be completed, and next year this weapon will be presented for state tests, after which the AK-12 will appear in service with the Russian army and its mass production will begin.

NPO Izhmash is a legal entity, its staff will include personnel and assets of the Izhmash group of enterprises, the largest of which have a monitoring procedure.

The group of companies "Izhmash" (Izhevsk Machine-Building Plant) is an industrial enterprise that is part of the state corporation "Rostekhnologii". Izhmash develops and manufactures special and civilian products — Nikonov and Kalashnikov assault rifles, sniper rifles, submachine guns, grenade launchers, guided artillery weapons, aircraft weapons, maintenance and repair of guided weapons, as well as special tools and machine tools. Izhmash was founded in 1807 year.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    69 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      6 June 2012 08: 05
      It is interesting how it will differ from the combined-arms one, with a different stock, with the placement of a sling attachment for a three-point belt, something never comes to mind. We will wait for autumn smile
      1. Owl
        +4
        6 June 2012 13: 49
        Gauge, the presence of PBS products, dimensions.
        1. 755962
          +2
          6 June 2012 15: 19
          The main feature of the new AK-12 assault rifle is the increased ergonomics of the weapon compared to its predecessors - AK-74, AK-74M, AKM. In addition to ergonomics, the work carried out increased the accuracy of fire, the reliability of the work and the service life of the machine. The main caliber of the new AK-12 will remain 5,4539. However, according to the manufacturer’s plans, the AK-12 can be produced both for domestic and foreign small-caliber cartridges 5,4539, 5,5645 and 6,5 Grendel, and for cartridges 7,6239 and 7,6251.
          1. Yarbay
            +4
            7 June 2012 11: 14
            I hope this machine does not fall into the hands of the Syrian rebels !!
      2. Mr. Truth
        +2
        6 June 2012 14: 41
        Quote: Joker
        Interestingly

        Me too, I believe that he will be multi-caliber.
    2. schta
      +1
      6 June 2012 08: 35
      Sorry for the tactlessness, but the picture is not AK-12
    3. wk
      +13
      6 June 2012 08: 44
      AK - 12 is a typical project "the new dress of the king" - a step back or away from the 100th series after the departure of MT Kalashnikov, the design idea at the enterprise finally died out, but the attempts to justify lobbying intensified many times over. So they hacked the AEK project, the Tula A 91, having adopted the more than controversial AN - 94 ... when will they stop cleaning guns in Russia?
      1. +3
        6 June 2012 09: 31
        I agree that AEK is an excellent machine and in accuracy in automatic mode the abacan exceeded by 100, abakan only has a fixed queue has an advantage, and even that is small.
      2. Kazak_30
        +1
        6 June 2012 14: 23
        I would choose AEK from all this trinity. Of all AK upgrades, this is the best. Abakan is good but expensive, difficult to learn and maintain. But I didn’t hear anything about Tula.
        1. +1
          6 June 2012 15: 53
          Quote: Kazak_30
          I would choose AEK from all this trinity. Of all AK upgrades, this is the best. Abakan is good but expensive, difficult to learn and maintain. But I didn’t hear anything about Tula.

          AN-94 has nothing to do with AK, except for the store, as well as AEK-971.
      3. +3
        6 June 2012 16: 16
        Another corpse is not bad to remember TKB-022ПМ

        As a small-sized machine, it is definitely better than AKSU and Thunderstorms.
        1. +2
          6 June 2012 17: 08
          Heman Korobov, a genius in his field, this is an Egor of the development of the 60,70s, the main thing is the maximum unification with AK, at least crack, sorry the students did not leave
          1. +1
            6 June 2012 19: 27
            Quote: Alex65
            main requirement maximum unification with AK

            And what is better unified with AK? Right, another AK wink Lobby, such a Lobby ...
      4. MrBoris555
        +1
        7 June 2012 14: 39
        so in general she and with him didn’t go very far forward-the alterations of the AKM-ak-74-ak-74m this is sorry pounding
    4. andrey903
      +1
      6 June 2012 09: 03
      For example, you can make interchangeable barrels for different ammunition. A gas piston of lower mass. There are still reserves
      1. +8
        6 June 2012 11: 51
        They will not do this with us, because as soon as they make a new machine, they immediately rush to check for reliability and if it is worse than the AK-47, then you flew by, and such as you offer a priori, it will be worse in terms of reliability. It seems that we don’t know in the army how to clean the machine and put it in any dirt on the road. For me personally, the best machine that currently exists is the FN Scar, the same interchangeable barrels, excellent accuracy, especially on the H version, and good reliability, worse than the AK but much better than the M4, low weight and excellent ergonomics, plus a lot of all buns made individually for him, for example, an underbarrel grenade launcher as in the photo.
        1. schonia06rus
          +2
          6 June 2012 13: 30
          Quote: Joker
          It seems that we don’t know in the army how the machine

          we had one type - conscripts, a healthy kid, and so he couldn’t knock out the ramrod. He knocked his hand into his blood, but could not! counting on such and make our machines.
        2. Kazak_30
          +4
          6 June 2012 14: 19
          If you equip the special forces FN Scar, I would rather agree with you, but for a regular army this is not the best option for it, it needs simple manufacturing and maintenance, reliable and most importantly cheap ... And AK in this regard is a cut above all.
          1. Alexey Prikazchikov
            -2
            6 June 2012 15: 11
            Yeah, and do not forget your overcoat and kirzachs, as they got me with brain kalashism.
            1. 0
              6 June 2012 17: 03
              no army does not need interchangeable barrel kits for a different cartridge.
              The ability to change trunks, but no more.
              In the hands of only the airsoft held not particularly liked.
              For me, so far the best is ak 105 in my body kit
            2. 0
              7 August 2012 19: 29
              you would be my friend weeks and a half in the raid would hit the road, all the European jambs and crawl out on the European trunks .......
          2. Passing
            -2
            7 June 2012 20: 42
            Quote: Kazak_30
            but for a regular army this is not the best option for it you need easy to manufacture and maintain, reliable and most importantly cheap ...

            Let me guess your ideal ... it's scrap! I guessed?!
        3. Mr. Truth
          0
          6 June 2012 14: 46
          Joker,
          IMHO it is advertised, no one except the MTR elite will definitely not see it. But the heckler has 416 and 417 models, they seem to me more adapted to modern conditions.
          1. 0
            6 June 2012 18: 14
            The number of delays during shooting at Skar’s tests was less than that of 416, 416 is not a good argument, they did it at first as a modernization of m-4, but they refused in the end because they decided to support their manufacturer in the USA, but so far they themselves haven’t done anything good , all 1-th modernization in the army is purchased.
        4. Alexey Prikazchikov
          0
          6 June 2012 15: 10
          About Skar I agree a luxurious thing, but about the rest I don’t really explain ak 12 because they presented it as a typewriter in which you can change the barrel, it will be another matter whether it will satisfy the requests for accuracy.
        5. -2
          6 June 2012 17: 01
          and for me better magpool masada

          http://www.liveguns.ru/node/1562
          1. Alexey Prikazchikov
            -3
            6 June 2012 17: 18
            This recycled MKA
            1. 0
              6 June 2012 17: 30
              It’s kind of based on SCAR which is based on G36 with its own changes.
        6. wk
          +1
          8 June 2012 12: 53
          You have not been to war ..... in the dash, your screwdriver is beautiful!
        7. GAMER0761
          0
          13 June 2012 09: 24
          I don’t argue, Scar is good. And the same characteristics are the same (initial bullet speed, etc.). But there is one drawback in contrast to the AK: he does not have a bayonet-knife!)
          1. 0
            9 July 2012 18: 54
            and he is not needed when there is a spatula.
        8. 0
          7 August 2012 19: 19
          joker with this crap only in cartoons to run ........... operational performance in a clash will not allow to survive .....- why the corpse is such a fool (it is difficult to transfer fire along the front, too big a projection when shooting while lying down, the sailing is too great, the irrational distribution of the recoil force .......), this is offhand, which can be seen immediately.
    5. Yoshkin Kot
      +1
      6 June 2012 09: 50
      we’ll see, Kalash is good for its reliability, which attracts the army, especially the conscript, if they do something more accurate and just as reliable, which is very difficult, they’ll put it on the conveyor, and it’s silly to change the flea
      1. 0
        7 August 2012 19: 36
        There are good developments on the topic of Abakan, but they are slightly superior to Kalash; therefore, it is too expensive to change the entire production, it is easier to process and refine the design that is in service, especially since the potential of the AK is far from exhausted.
    6. Andron24
      0
      6 June 2012 11: 03
      It seems that they will put a muzzle brake on the new AK-12, and not just a flame arrester, which will significantly reduce the return. The receiver will become more rigid. Picatinny slats are also + Now everything on the machine can be controlled with one hand. Ergonomic handle) I just do not like this pillar arrangement. The familiar location was better.
      1. borisst64
        +3
        6 June 2012 11: 30
        Quote: Andron24
        not just a flame arrester


        The name of the part of the AK-74 assault rifle is "muzzle brake compensator". There was a flame arrester on the DP. ))
        Even if there is something new, then there is no need to talk about a significant reduction in returns.
      2. Eugene
        +1
        6 June 2012 11: 53
        Quote: Andron24
        I just do not like this arrangement of the pillar. The familiar location was better.

        But the line of sight is greater)
      3. 0
        6 June 2012 22: 55
        Is 74 a serious return?
      4. 0
        7 August 2012 19: 38
        but increasing the length of the line of sight has a beneficial effect on the accuracy of the fire
    7. Andron24
      0
      6 June 2012 12: 25
      I don’t know, in my opinion a short aiming line gives greater accuracy due to the fact that the number of vibrations of such an open sight is less. In fact, from the point of view of geometry, the length of the line of sight gives a higher accuracy of shooting, but the oscillations of the front sight in the sight become stronger. For me, an open sight with a short aiming line good
    8. 0
      6 June 2012 12: 59
      Some kind of "angular".
    9. Andron24
      +1
      6 June 2012 13: 23
      Another modification of Kalashnikov. A couple of improvements no more. This is all the same Kalash, whoever says anything. Maybe a little more comfortable. All the insides remained the same. Well, yes, the new Sight, Butt, Fire mode switch, Controls, Receiver, Picatinny rail, Receiver cover, Barrel and Muzzle device. What has changed significantly? For some reason, many say that this is a fundamentally new weapon. I understand that if the designers eliminated the problem of the retractable parts not aligned with the barrel bore or worked on the gas engine.
      1. 0
        6 June 2012 14: 20
        I do not agree, for example, the same M4 is a modification of the M16. Those changes that you have listed, it is impossible to make on the past "insides". in addition, the advantages are listed (when firing, there is less recoil, when firing a burst, the machine takes less away), in other words, the accuracy and accuracy have increased. Which again is impossible to do on the past "guts". The ergonomics have improved again. Plus the reliability of the AK (according to the creators). I see only positive dynamics. Well, in general, I wonder how you know that the designers did not "eliminate the problem of the recoil parts not coaxial to the barrel bore or worked on the gas engine." Did you hold or disassemble it? Or identified by the photo?
        1. Andron24
          0
          6 June 2012 17: 10
          Because the retractable parts and the gas engine are not coaxial with the bore, this is what Kalashnikov pays for its excellent reliability. AK-12 inherited these shortcomings, because it was made on the basis of the same Kalash, and the design of the gas outlet remained the same. I did not say that all modifications are not for the good. Naturally there are pluses.
          1. Passing
            0
            7 June 2012 20: 52
            Quote: Andron24
            the rolling parts that are not coaxial to the bore and the gas engine - this is what Kalashnikov pays for its excellent reliability.

            Sorry, but you are writing heresy, the basis of Kalash reliability is a massive bolt frame, an excessively large impulse transmitted to it, large tolerances, and the simplest design.
            And "the recoil parts and the gas engine not coaxial to the barrel bore" is nothing at all, this non-alignment is inherent in 99,9% of gas outlet structures.
      2. +1
        6 June 2012 17: 48
        for the production of a new machine on a scale it is necessary to change the entire machine park in production, this is too expensive a pleasure.
        1. +2
          6 June 2012 20: 59
          Then what the hell are they saying this is an in-depth modification?
        2. +3
          6 June 2012 22: 45
          Quote: hert
          for the production of a new machine on a scale it is necessary to change the entire machine park in production, this is too expensive a pleasure.

          Production facilities, it’s useful to update 30-40 years, IzhMash:



          Machine tools from almost the post-war period and the abundance of manual labor - this is not even funny.
          photos from here: http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/16712/
          1. MrBoris555
            0
            7 June 2012 14: 45
            here for these purposes and update machines
      3. MrBoris555
        0
        7 June 2012 14: 45
        and who told you that they don’t work? The circuit operating on the AK is quite viable and the only minus is the backlash due to which vibration occurs. And if you think about it, then all M4 and M16A * and so on and so on is a remake of the Stoner circuit, no more
    10. Mr. Truth
      +1
      6 June 2012 14: 53
      If you create an intermediate cartridge of the 4th generation (7,62x39 1st 5,56 and 5,45 2nd 5,8 2,5th 6,8 3rd) and optimize AK-12 for it, you can get adequate and very powerful shooting system. And while there is no cartridge (the closest analogue is 6,5 grendel, but it is sport-hunting), no country will take a greater step forward than is possible under the existing limitations of modern cartridges.
      1. +1
        6 June 2012 15: 55
        Here's what I don't understand, comrades, is the fashion to find fault with the 7,62x39 cartridge. This is akin to the fashion of 5th year cadets (who, as you know, are arch-professionals in the shooting business) to find fault with PM. Good patron. For the conduct of combined arms combat - the very thing. 6,8x43, 6,5x55 - more expensive, moreover, high-impulse. Why do you need an "intermediate intermediate" cartridge? IMHO - a waste of money ....
        1. Mr. Truth
          0
          6 June 2012 16: 31
          Quote: woland05
          high pulse

          Normally, they have everything with returns, it is not necessary to suppress VET calculations by 200 meters around the tank anymore, so the need for low-impulses has disappeared. The 6,8 SPC and 6,5x39 grendel (6,5x55 is from another opera) do not have a very large return.
    11. Mr. Truth
      +3
      6 June 2012 16: 27
      woland05,
      Quote: woland05
      to blame the cartridge 7,62x39

      The cartridge is good, no words, but its supply for modernization has been exhausted. External ballistics is also very mediocre. We need a new optimal rifle ammunition.
      1. 0
        6 June 2012 17: 55
        ways to modernize the cartridges are still sea-new gunpowder (including liquid explosives), refinement of the damaging elements (bullets), the machines can work with rifling + barrel steel ......., etc.
        1. Mr. Truth
          +2
          6 June 2012 18: 20
          Quote: hert

          ways to modernize the cartridges are still sea-new gunpowder (including liquid explosives), refinement of the damaging elements (bullets), the machines can work with rifling + barrel steel ......., etc.

          it’s for 7,62x39 as a dead poultice, it still can’t reach the required level. The optimal next-generation shooting cartridges should have very high external-ballistic qualities,
          for a small lung, this is G1 BC at the level of 0.5-0.55 (this is most easily achieved with 6,5 mm caliber) and for large-caliber BC it is not less than 1. (it is easier to achieve 10 mm in caliber)
    12. Igor
      0
      6 June 2012 17: 28
      17 million barrels are lying in warehouses and not one sk..tina from the Moscow Region and the military-industrial complex did not bother to modernize at least 500 thousand pieces. Some secret Russian heroes do not know what kind of weapon the army needs, other copy-pasteurists from the military-industrial complex produce copies of AEK and AN- 94, but pass this miracle-udo for a new machine gun, it seems they scored the new cartridges altogether, as the weight was under 4 kg. that’s what remained, probably it’s not practical to use more plastic in the construction, and suddenly a nuclear war will happen, because then the molten plastic will smear the breech form and berets.

      We create a "bicycle", despite the fact that this very "bicycle" was already created by us, but earlier. And the fate of this "bicycle" will be the same as that of the old "bicycle". Meanwhile, the Americans have created an 8,6 mm machine gun , which is not inferior in firepower to machine guns with a caliber of 12,7 mm.
      1. Mr. Truth
        +1
        6 June 2012 17: 57
        Quote: Igorek
        Meanwhile, the Americans created a machine gun of 8,6 mm caliber,

        "The American army got" already sounds like "British scientists have discovered" ... a joke of humor, could not resist.
        8,6 paws is certainly not the most powerful in 8,6 caliber, there is more powerful, but the external ballistics corresponds to the American 0.50th. (Ballistic coefficient for example)
        and since the future is in optimal ammunition, let's say 8,6 is of course close to a reasonable optimum, but not enough, the best cartridge as a machine-gun sniper at the moment is 10.6 x83 mm barrels. if in the unit they develop a bullet for 8,6x70 LM with the G1 GK at the level of 1-1,1, then it will be possible to replace 12,7 mm with 8,6 as a lighter and more advanced ammunition.
        1. Igor
          0
          6 June 2012 18: 34
          Quote: Mr. Truth
          "The American army got" already sounds like "British scientists have discovered" ... a joke of humor, could not resist.


          Nevertheless, she received it: http://worldweapon.ru/video/novyj-legkij-pelemet-lwmmg.php
    13. 0
      6 June 2012 17: 39
      6,5 attracts with its ballistics. BUT 7.62x39 cartridge, which has proven itself both in mountainous and wooded areas, and in settlements. As for the balistic, it’s 100 meters normal, in the above conditions. A distance of 200m. it's closer to sniper shooting. AK-12 for special forces ........ the barrel is shorter (AK-104), the rear swivel under the butt (for a one-point belt), well, probably all that can be squeezed out of it.
      1. 0
        7 August 2012 19: 47
        the nature of the hostilities has changed, weapons are being optimized for it, now the battle is being conducted mainly on a short circuit, positional only occasionally if necessary (they switched to auxiliary operations)
      2. bachast
        0
        7 August 2012 20: 08
        well-established both in mountainous and wooded areas and in settlements

        I would be grateful if you explain what advantage this caliber has over others under these conditions. If it has, of course. And are there any disadvantages when used in other areas
    14. pribolt
      0
      6 June 2012 17: 50
      Well what can you say AK 12, only there is the impression that we are stuck in one place.
    15. +2
      6 June 2012 18: 08
      It would be better to have a separate body kit line, as bourgeois have been riveting for decades! Let our special forces, not for hard-earned money, acquire this plastic on bourgeois sites, but in the "bins of the Motherland", because they need it in their service. (although it depends on the point of view)
      And the fact that ak12 gave birth, pleases in the subject: "slow-witted century." Only the lazy one did not make this whole list of "innovations" and the lazy one - IZHMASH. Yes, such things ... And thank you for giving birth, a new century in the yard ...
    16. +1
      6 June 2012 18: 26
      Judging by the information, the AK-12 with unbalanced mechanics, balanced remained only in the hundredth series. Why is balanced mechanics less preferable? Judging by the reviews, the balanced one does not give any recoil at all, and the "pullback" of the barrel when firing bursts is leveled by the muzzle compensator. The reason for the transition to unbalanced mechanics is not clear. Apparently, the design is more complex and, accordingly, the production technology. And the "spetsnaz" AK-12 will most likely have a different body kit. "In August last year, the Izhmash Design and Technology Center began work on the AK-12, and in December the first prototype of this machine was ready."For SUCH PERIOD, it is somehow unrealistic to create something new in modern conditions. Most likely, something has already been developed. In Soviet times, a self-respecting designer, when launching a new product into production, already had in his desk proposals for modernizing his brainchild and through a year old already received an award for "work done to improve-modernization" wassat
      1. Passing
        0
        7 June 2012 21: 00
        Quote: Black Colonel
        How did balanced mechanics turn out to be less preferable?

        IMHO, could not provide an acceptable resource, the synchronization node (gear) breaks. In order not to break, modern technologies are needed, and with them on Izhmash it is still tight.
        Quote: Black Colonel
        Judging by the reviews, balanced doesn't give any return at all,

        No recoil is felt, but there is no "jerk" from the shutter strike in the extreme positions. According to reviews, a balanced machine "sticks" to the shoulder.
    17. 89651544551
      0
      7 June 2012 00: 27
      PLAN PICATINI? IN OUR COUNTRY DO NOT DO ANYTHING FOR HER
    18. cobra66
      0
      7 June 2012 08: 19
      God forbid that they would not destroy the machine, so that it would go into production. I wonder how they will call him in America? laughing Probably Ak-47 tactical
    19. 0
      7 June 2012 11: 10
      Quote: Joker
      They will not do this with us, because as soon as they make a new machine, they all immediately rush to check for reliability and if it is worse than the AK-47, then you flew by, and such as you offer a priori, it will be worse in reliability. It seems that we don’t know in the army how to clean the machine and put it in any dirt on the road. For me personally, the best machine that currently exists is the FN Scar, the same interchangeable barrels, excellent accuracy, especially on the H version, and good reliability, worse than the AK but much better than the M4,

      We need to decide for whom this weapon is. Professional or "soldier" with a year of service.
    20. vylvyn
      -1
      8 June 2012 18: 51
      Yo, the butt just kills with its intricacy and whiskiness. And it is unclear why the trained spetsnaz soldier has a three-round cutoff? The specialist will release a line of 2,5 rounds without any cutoffs.
      1. 0
        7 August 2012 19: 51
        the cutoff for 3 shots is designed only to save the b / c for conscripts: the specialists work single and flash.
    21. Boyfriend
      0
      17 June 2012 23: 41
      Previously, they normally shot in normal bursts and did not complain, but put a bandage in the butt at 74 and that's it! and between the stores, the sleeve and the electrical tape, rewind you and the universal combined-arms machine for special forces!
    22. 0
      9 July 2012 18: 59
      it is necessary to change the caliber, to the Soviet 6.5x39 it has even more power than 7.62x39 and the return is less, but few people know about it, but this cartridge has already been redone by amers, espionage is a great thing!
      1. 0
        7 August 2012 19: 53
        everyone steals, everyone borrows; but there are trendsetters ......
    23. 0
      April 6 2013 12: 24
      Give the blaster to the troops so that the enemies would squeak with fright good

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"