British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

151
More and more often, materials appear in the Western press in which the authors try to compare Russia's military capabilities with the NATO bloc or with the United States. Most of the “researchers” data on the Russian army, apparently, are taken from the same Western media, and therefore some articles cannot be read without laughing. This time, the British tabloid Daily Express undertook to compare the capabilities of the Russian army and NATO forces, the translation is presented by "RT".

British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO




The authors of the "research" from the Daily Express, having studied the data on the Russian armed forces and compared them with the data on the NATO army, came to the unequivocal conclusion that Russia allegedly would not be able to resist the forces of the alliance. According to British analysts, NATO forces have an advantage over Russia in terms of personnel, since the Russian army has only 1 million servicemen, and the alliance has 2 million.In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in terms of the number of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft the Russian army can only deploy 3 units. The only thing that Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can deploy 20 thousand combat vehicles.

On the other hand, the authors admit that the main forces of the alliance are in the USA, and this is very far from Europe. Therefore, the Baltic countries, which will not be able to withstand the Russian army, become the most vulnerable in the event of a “Russian attack”. But as long as they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO "will conduct a crushing counter-attack," which the Russian army "cannot counter." In the end, losing the war, Russia will threaten to use nuclear weapon.

Here is a "military research" published a British tabloid. The level of British "military experts" is just suitable for writing terrible tales with a military bias, but a good ending especially for the European population. And in Europe, such fairy tales love and, most importantly, believe in them.
151 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    6 December 2018 17: 50
    ABOUT! Another soothsayer!
    1. +20
      6 December 2018 17: 55
      Quote: LeonidL
      ABOUT! Another soothsayer!

      Not a soothsayer, but a stoned finger. hi
      1. +10
        6 December 2018 17: 59
        And in Europe, they love such tales and, most importantly, believe in them.
        Then you need more tales. Yes The more they believe in their exclusivity, the more mistakes they make .....
        1. +4
          6 December 2018 19: 19
          Without Russia, land is not needed! They should understand this for a long time! This is of course to the extreme, but anything happens. We’ll bang Europe in years .. We’ll drown Britain)
      2. +7
        6 December 2018 18: 13
        Can we just suck? There are many of these in Europe .....
        1. +4
          6 December 2018 20: 45
          ABOUT! intolerance?
          1. +1
            7 December 2018 03: 51
            Quote: novel xnumx
            ABOUT! intolerance?


            Absolute impunity. laughing lol

            For tolerance, this is exactly the same for the savers.

            Novel hi
      3. +6
        6 December 2018 21: 16
        The only thing Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can put up 20 of thousands of military vehicles.

        These ANALYTICS can give any numbers ... just forgot about the Russian nuclear weapons, which can multiply Europe and the USA in the literal sense of the word. I'm not talking about England, which will be washed into the ocean.
      4. 0
        7 December 2018 17: 26
        Quote: Evdokim
        Not a soothsayer, but a stoned finger.

        there is doubt it was a finger ... hi
    2. +13
      6 December 2018 17: 55
      Quote: LeonidL

      ABOUT! Another soothsayer!

      Especially funny about the resistance in the Baltic countries fool fool Resist before lunch and surrender together. And the Americans will open the second front only in three years ... and earlier they will not succeed!
      1. +2
        6 December 2018 20: 24
        The Baltic "lions" will definitely remain out of work.
      2. +1
        7 December 2018 03: 53
        Quote: the most important
        Resist before lunch and surrender together


        Иmitation Бballot box Дactivities.
    3. +7
      6 December 2018 17: 58
      In the British tabloid all malacholny!
      1. +5
        6 December 2018 18: 14
        Quote: Halado romance
        In the British tabloid all malacholny!

        And hay steal on their dragon am
      2. +1
        6 December 2018 18: 50
        they will not go beyond the borders of NATO-- the right kind of beer - no, no toilets.
        discomfort will not be tolerated.
        It’s easier for them to surrender themselves and stay close to their favorite beer.
        and how they will work in captivity in Kolyma - it's just horror, ale freezes
        1. +2
          6 December 2018 20: 23
          And we don’t distribute ice cream only if it’s natural.
    4. +12
      6 December 2018 18: 00
      Quote: LeonidL
      ABOUT! Another soothsayer!


      No, everything is much simpler and this is described in the end of the article ...

      "... This is a" military study "published by a British tabloid. The level of British" military experts "is just right for writing scary tales with a military bias, but a good ending especially for the European population. And in Europe, such tales are loved and, most importantly, believe in them ... "

      Considering that the world media, including the British, are under the control of the United States, another fairy tale fits very well on the theme that only the United States (and the NATO bloc) can help the poor Europeans, so there is no need to invent anything about the European army and even make attempts on this score, but simply believe in the power of the United States and its "mission of good", along the way buying all VO exclusively from the same United States.
    5. +9
      6 December 2018 18: 00
      All tabloids need to make it a rule to provide historical information .. In which year they went to Russia, what was the ratio, how they raked, how they repented and how Russia, nobly, allocated two meters of land to everyone ..
      1. +9
        6 December 2018 18: 22
        Quote: Svarog
        All tabloids need to make it a rule to provide historical information .. In which year they went to Russia, what was the ratio, how they raked, how they repented and how Russia, nobly, allocated two meters of land to everyone ..

        History teaches that if you get burned by taking a hot pan with your bare hand, then the next time you either take it with a tack or a thick mitten. Behind a large puddle, too, are not fools, although they are too arrogant and arrogant, therefore, since their goal has remained unchanged for many decades and centuries, then you should not flaunt them in good shape, but you definitely need to prepare for battle.
        1. +6
          6 December 2018 18: 43
          Quote: credo
          History teaches that if you get burned by taking a red-hot pan with your bare hand, then the next time you either take it with a tack or a thick mitten

          So the joke is that their history does not teach anything .. As long as we have nuclear weapons, no one will fight with us. I am convinced of this. They want to fight the Ukrainians, Poles and the Baltic states against us .. But at the expense of victory, seriously, I'm not sure .. this time. It really hurts the public, which at the head of the state is muddy with us .. More than half have dual citizenship, almost all children live behind enemy lines ..
          1. +5
            6 December 2018 19: 13
            I agree, our elite is very muddy, their children are held hostage by the West, by their will or against?
        2. SSR
          +1
          6 December 2018 19: 15
          Quote: credo
          History teaches that if you get burned by taking a hot pan with your bare hand, then the next time you either take it with a tack or a thick mitten.

          Are you talking about us or them? If about them, then they got off with light burns and we were burned to the bone, the grasp and gloves should be thicker.
          Neither the 41st nor Beslan, we should not allow it anymore, they are used to doing everything with the wrong hands.
          1. +1
            6 December 2018 20: 23
            I hope we learned the lessons well.
        3. +1
          6 December 2018 21: 48
          but it’s necessary to prepare for battle.
          precisely because we are getting ready (and the West overlooked it at the time) this is the very reason why bile is pouring and military scum is gathering from all over the world. Let them arrange a bacchanalia further, and we will calmly improve our army. Step by step, without any fuss.
      2. +2
        6 December 2018 19: 33
        Quote: Svarog
        All tabloids need to make it a rule to provide historical information .. In which year they went to Russia, what was the ratio, how they raked, how they repented and how Russia, nobly, allocated two meters of land to everyone ..

        Or ask the predecessor, who was slightly torn and ate poison
        ...
    6. +5
      6 December 2018 18: 32
      Not. Another custom article. You can boast of muscles as much as you like. But in fact - even if you take apart from what he wrote.
      1) It’s not a fact that this help will be able to get across the Atlantic, and not rest on the vast expanses of the oceans, and even if it gets there in parts, and these parts will just go in waves and not all at once.
      2) Until they get there - their main trump card - navigation satellites will order a long life. And without them, their high-tech equipment is largely dead.
      3) Belarus and Kazakhstan will not stand aside either.
      4) To them, then bish NATO, we meddle at all is not a reason - we do not need them like their territory. The main thing is that they themselves do not climb. Accordingly, they will attack, and this is a completely different calico. And the answer as a hot nuclear kiss will not be inevitable. No one will scare them, just the key to the start.
      So all the research data and topics - eggs are not worth it.
      1. 0
        7 December 2018 09: 12
        I agree with you, but not completely, I very much doubt that Kazakhstan will fit ..
        And yes, you are right, V.P. Putin made it clear that in the event of external aggression, we reserve the right to deliver a preventive nuclear strike. You don’t need to be a genius to think logically to come to the conclusion that in case of war the warring parties will fight with the weapons and ammunition that were at the beginning, since all the important components of economic structures that can produce military products will be destroyed first and foremost .d
    7. +2
      7 December 2018 00: 25
      hearing about British experts is already becoming more fun
  2. +6
    6 December 2018 17: 54
    The theme for these hacks is a win-win, they will always print, they will always pay.
    1. SSR
      +2
      6 December 2018 19: 24
      Quote: Not bad
      The theme for these hacks is a win-win, they will always print, they will always pay.

      So before the Crimean War, their media raised such a wave that from dockers to sirs, they went in droves with a newspaper in their hands and chanted - to the Crimea!
  3. +6
    6 December 2018 18: 03
    I know only one thing. There will be no winners in such a war. When it comes to nuclear weapons
    1. +5
      6 December 2018 18: 15
      Quote: 210ox
      When it comes to nuclear weapons

      In their place, I would pray earnestly that God forbid the Russians did not use Soviet tactics - when the enemy's defense area is burned out with the help of TNW and these same tanks "which are more" and motorized rifle units on armor rush into this gap, which can go everywhere, unlike some forty-ton irons.
  4. +7
    6 December 2018 18: 05
    Not so much nuclear weapons are needed for Britain, so that geographic maps would later be corrected.
    And let analysts of this kind remember this phrase:
    Why do we need a world in which Russia will not be
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 20: 21
      Yes, don’t waste weapons on them, they will wash them off in a wave.
  5. +10
    6 December 2018 18: 07
    Vladimir Putin tried to reassure the Europeans by declaring that there is no need to be afraid of Russia. Our military budget is incomparable with the similar expenses of NATO, the Russian leader says. Only a sick person could think that the Russian Federation is capable of aggression, with a significant lag in the overall potential. "
    This is an excerpt from https://www.google.kz/amp/s/free-news.su/politika/1957-rossija-ne-napadet-na-nato/amp
    Surprisingly, they still have not realized that in the event of a threat to the existence of Russia, a nuclear strike will be delivered on everyone, including the United States. Further along Zadornov and Lavrov.
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 20: 21
      It will, but it may be too late.
  6. +1
    6 December 2018 18: 07
    most importantly, the United States will not fight, for this it’s NATO and it is. The Yankees will throw up arms and ammunition, they can catch mercenaries, they will interfere and harm in every way, but they themselves will go into war when for example, there will be a turning point in favor of NATO, but, then we will have to use the last argument, a thermonuclear weapon.
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 18: 46
      Quote: ANCIENT
      most importantly, the United States will not fight; for this, it’s the NATO. The Yankees will throw weapons and ammunition ......

      It is possible that more and the fat will be removed from this.
  7. +6
    6 December 2018 18: 09
    The level of British "military experts"

    Corresponds to the level of "British scientists" - So what, what nonsense. They pay money, and okay. In the meantime, when the Bear growls, everyone stands on the circus and barks. Even the Americans. Continent Nash and nemnogo Chinese, the rest of the peninsula and islands. And who told you that the Russians are fighting by your rules fool
    1. +6
      6 December 2018 20: 20
      They forgot that when the war, then we cancel all the rules.
      1. +2
        6 December 2018 21: 05
        Quote: cniza
        They forgot that when the war, then we cancel all the rules

        That's right. The rules are not any but the Yankees are better off swimming further from our anger.
        You would know that My Wife is regarding Yankee. It's very scary. I’ll raise and bring up
        1. +2
          6 December 2018 21: 08
          Yeah, and do not even glance in our direction.
          1. +1
            6 December 2018 22: 12
            Quote: cniza
            Yeah, and do not even glance in our direction.

            Not. I am very kind and my wife is much kinder, but only! Bourgeois live happily over the hill and still don’t do my nerve hi bully
  8. +6
    6 December 2018 18: 13
    tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

    Surprised, here on our website they constantly write this, in recent years ... crying
    But we still do not give up here and in general, despite the persecution of Russia and all of us ..
    Let them snoop .. This time, we will not spare anyone and the tanks will not stop .. (you can kick ..)))
    1. +3
      6 December 2018 20: 19
      Rather, we are not on the surrender, but they all demand.
      1. +4
        6 December 2018 20: 47
        Quote: cniza
        Rather, we are not on the surrender, but they all demand.

        laughing good Oh how they demand ..

        Well, we live on the edge .. soldier
        1. +1
          6 December 2018 20: 52
          The main thing is that no one is bored.
  9. Cry
    +2
    6 December 2018 18: 15
    The war will go on in Europe, and not in America, and the EU states will have to fight alone, and the dwarf STATES will simply throw a bulldozer into the Baltic to feed the sprats. All western million-plus cities will be wiped off the face of the Earth by both American and Russian missiles during the first attacks, so they will have to flee south to Africa, where they will make the cradle of mankind happy and EVERYTHING will have to start with a club in hand.
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 18: 36
      By the way, the chances of survival on the African continent are pretty good. If I were the oligarchs, I would have staked out "African" citizenship
      1. +1
        6 December 2018 19: 36
        Quote: igorbrsv
        By the way, the chances of survival on the African continent are pretty good. If I were the oligarchs, I would have staked out "African" citizenship

        The Chinese also think so
      2. Cry
        +2
        7 December 2018 02: 51
        They will be there white gods or eat them, like Cook.
        1. -1
          8 December 2018 16: 16
          Rather, they eat, they themselves have nothing to eat.
      3. 0
        7 December 2018 08: 33
        Quote: igorbrsv
        By the way, the chances of surviving on the African continent are pretty good.


        I would say on the contrary, very weak. Now Africa is being held back by the "white" countries, mainly the one overseas. It is beneficial for them to keep African countries in a primitive poverty state. These are easier to manage, and to develop natural resources that are dofig out there.
        What happens after the apocalypse? When this external power weakens or disappears. It seems to me that everything will change quite a lot, and everything will be remembered to the white man. I would not expect to survive there.
        1. -1
          8 December 2018 16: 18
          Rzzz! I agree with you! African immigration to Europe is just flowers. And at home they will quickly explain who the boss is. South Africa must be remembered.
        2. Cry
          0
          9 December 2018 07: 45
          What seems to you quite likely with a single correction: after the third world, you will have to go back to your ancestors and start looking for a place under the sun with a baton.
          1. 0
            9 December 2018 16: 36
            Yes, no, those regions where edrenny bombs will not be thrown hundreds, they will not suffer much. So consider Africa, South America, Australia and Oceania, part of Southeast Asia - will be almost unaffected and suitable for living. But civilization will roll back very strongly, of course.
            1. Cry
              0
              9 December 2018 17: 47
              I agree, but the civilized ones will slide to their level in a primitive communal system, where the value is not a dollar, but a piece of bread or a handful of rice that you will get with a baton, since cartridges, gunpowder, production for their manufacture will disappear, pizza too.
              1. 0
                9 December 2018 20: 03
                Well, not to the primitive. I think - somewhere at the level of the first half of the twentieth century. Only what is now considered high technology will disappear. Electronics, computers, pharmaceuticals and weight-technology medicine. Complex chemistry and biotechnology. Well, that sort of thing. And the main technologies will not go anywhere. Digging up iron ore and coal and casting iron is not a very complicated technology. To get steel from it in an open-hearth way is more difficult, but also no fiction.
                1. Cry
                  0
                  9 December 2018 21: 00
                  Everything will undergo a radioactive infection, which means it will be unusable, so you will have to run into the cradle of humanity without pants, and in this form you will not be any different from savages. For them you will be of value as a piece of meat.
                  1. 0
                    9 December 2018 21: 22
                    Savages also have a hard time. They are also very used to the benefits of civilization. But if we even know and know how to create these benefits, then they will not have this.

                    Quote: Choro
                    For them you will be of value as a piece of meat.

                    And you? What stand out?

                    I personally don’t bother at all and generally will not run anywhere, even if I survive. Due to some specifics of health, I am not able to live without some drugs. There will be enough reserves for several months; after the global catastrophe, there will be no where to replenish them.
                    1. Cry
                      0
                      10 December 2018 04: 28
                      Want to say that you are a living corpse?
  10. +3
    6 December 2018 18: 20
    Russian tabloid predicts the defeat of NATO in the war with Russia. What's next?
  11. +3
    6 December 2018 18: 22
    It is unlikely that Berlin will be occupied in one month, in NATO the armies have become not only weak but also morally ugly ...
    1. +4
      6 December 2018 20: 18
      But then the soldiers with painted nails.
  12. +3
    6 December 2018 18: 23
    A tale for Nyusha .. they calm themselves ...
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 20: 17
      It seems the last arguments have gone ...
  13. +2
    6 December 2018 18: 24

    In the event of a NATO attack, there will be a nuclear response, they have already spoken about this a hundred times.
    Russia will not attack the Balts - what for do we need them?
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 20: 52
      Quote: Every
      Russia will not attack the Balts - what for do we need them?

      Well, someone still has to be questioned ..And then finish! soldier
  14. 0
    6 December 2018 18: 37
    I would advise the tabloid to re-read the newspapers of the Third Reich for 41-43
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +1
    6 December 2018 18: 40
    British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO
    some kind of kindergarten, compare the total population of NATO countries, the total military budget, production capabilities, etc. etc., and most importantly - is Russia going to fight with NATO? They themselves came up with an achressor, they themselves predict a defeat, but let them not forget about nuclear weapons
  17. +2
    6 December 2018 18: 43
    Yes, the excessive consumption of beer dilutes the brain, definitely. Again the Baltic states, did the light converge on it like a wedge? And why did Poland, Romania and the Czech Republic stand aside? What about Norway? Everyone will fly by the hill, it will not seem enough. The islanders are thinking of staying behind the strait, so when we developed the PT-76. If anything, immediately wait for a visit ... laughing tongue wassat
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 20: 16
      Well, let them dream and reason.
  18. 0
    6 December 2018 18: 44
    crying © Lavrov
    What is our analogue of this newspaper? Speedinfo or what?
  19. +1
    6 December 2018 18: 53
    At least they came up with something new ... Aliens, They would drag magic, you look it will be more interesting to read))
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 20: 15
      This is the next step and in their defense, they say they did not let Russia win.
  20. +1
    6 December 2018 18: 53
    Well, the Anglo-Saxons are not dumb in the plan to be poured into tanks with the help of their "independent small" media. They created the RT, and even that will not be enough.
  21. +4
    6 December 2018 18: 58
    And the Balts were immediately written off. That is, the Balts should ask NATO: "Do you admit that we have no chance?"
    And then go think ...
  22. +1
    6 December 2018 19: 08
    All in one installment - British scientists, politicians, generals and magazine experts.
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 20: 14
      In a word, experts.
  23. +2
    6 December 2018 19: 21
    Where are we going to bury them all?
    1. +3
      6 December 2018 20: 14
      Quote: Cannonball
      Where are we going to bury them all?


      Frequently Asked Question in Russia, for 1000 years.
  24. +4
    6 December 2018 19: 21
    British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

    Oh well.
    How many months have a coalition been raised against Iraq? Three months? Five? At this pace, while you collect all 2 million, they will devour all the food mob reserves and spoil all the local girls ..
    And who will guard the colony of ki all this time? Do not run away?
    1. +3
      6 December 2018 20: 13
      They did not think about this yet.
  25. +1
    6 December 2018 19: 34
    It seems that the material is custom-made, the Americans are preparing the British population to fight Russia. There isn’t even any emphasis on the liberation struggle, it’s not important who attacks anyone.
    Do Americans always take on the role of procurement?
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 20: 12
      Nobody will fight them, because their army has become tolerant ..
      1. 0
        7 December 2018 19: 20
        Quote: cniza
        Nobody will fight them, because their army has become tolerant ..

        These will be driven, tolerance must be worked out ....................

        God forbid, to get to such ...............
        1. +1
          7 December 2018 20: 32
          The most terrible executioners are female, I do not specifically call them people ... and I really love women.
  26. +3
    6 December 2018 19: 36
    Wise guys did not take into account the main hitch: her name is a Russian peasant! BYAD will be, EVERYTHING, if he is, is very angry am
    1. +2
      6 December 2018 20: 11
      They do not teach history, but this is their problem.
      1. +1
        6 December 2018 20: 38
        So they need it!)))
        1. +2
          6 December 2018 20: 49
          Maybe, but they will beg for what they beg.
          1. +1
            6 December 2018 21: 36
            To give them their due, they know how to "beg", and receive, accordingly, occasionally wassat
            1. +2
              6 December 2018 21: 54
              I don’t want to say this word, let’s say so, apparently they like it. lol
              1. +1
                7 December 2018 00: 26
                Pathological tendency to "sadomaso", probably negative
                1. +2
                  7 December 2018 09: 00
                  Something in this direction.
  27. +2
    6 December 2018 19: 50
    "As a result, losing the war, Russia will threaten to use nuclear weapons." (C) -that's where he neighing specifically. Explain to these "experts" that the war in the Russia-NATO format will begin with the use of nuclear weapons .... and on this the world is familiar im-will end a little. for all. IMHO
  28. BAI
    +6
    6 December 2018 19: 58
    came to the unequivocal conclusion that Russia supposedly could not resist the forces of the alliance.

    If Russia cannot win, then why are they constantly panicking?
    1. 0
      6 December 2018 20: 01
      The prostate is not iron.
      1. +2
        6 December 2018 20: 10
        Quote: BAI
        came to the unequivocal conclusion that Russia supposedly could not resist the forces of the alliance.

        If Russia cannot win, then why are they constantly panicking?


        Just in case.
  29. +4
    6 December 2018 20: 00
    I am more interested in whom Brylev and Solovyov will be at war, and others are not our comrades.
  30. +4
    6 December 2018 20: 02
    As a result, losing the war, Russia will threaten to use nuclear weapons

    First, if Russia remains able to "threaten" it means that it has not yet lost the war and is not even going to.
    Secondly, these sofa iksperds still hope to wage and win the war by conventional means.
    And thirdly: does NATO have a plan B in case Russia does not threaten to use nuclear weapons. And apply it immediately and without too much trepidation?
  31. +3
    6 December 2018 20: 03
    The Anglo-Saxons would have to attend to a completely different problem - in fact, in the event of a conflict between the Russian Federation and NATO, the British Isles will be destroyed in the first place and at any subsequent outcome of this conflict for the Russian Federation.
    1. +5
      6 December 2018 20: 10
      Yes, do not destroy them, I mean the islands, but their warrior yes ...
  32. +2
    6 December 2018 20: 09
    According to British analysts, NATO forces have an advantage over Russia in terms of personnel, since the Russian army has only 1 million troops, and the alliance has 2 million. In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in terms of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft the Russian army can put up only 3 thousand 914 units.


    How can they all forget that they are fighting not with numbers, but with skill, that was said by A.V.Suvorov.
  33. 0
    6 December 2018 20: 13
    NATO forces have an advantage over Russia in terms of personnel, since the Russian army has only 1 million troops, and the alliance has 2 million. In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in terms of equipment in the Air Force: against the 13 thousand aircraft, the Russian army can only 3 thousand. 914 units. The only thing Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can put up 20 thousand combat vehicles.

    In addition, the ratio of NATO strategic nuclear forces is not in Russia's favor; under the CMEA-3 treaty, the reduction of strategic nuclear forces is now 1 (for Russia) to 1,8 (for NATO)
  34. +1
    6 December 2018 20: 19
    But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a devastating counterattack

    Saakashvili also smoked such a baidu. Before as. Either he resisted little, or they were not in a hurry, - the fact is that "help did not come, no reinforcements were sent, in general, here's the thing: you and I ... got fucked."
  35. -3
    6 December 2018 20: 22
    I don’t understand one thing. Banyat for all nonsense. Here they dumped from a garbage can - slurp. Neither the author, nor the source, nor the layout. Who is the British tabloid? Who are always knocking on the scoreboard?
  36. 0
    6 December 2018 20: 23
    Looks like the "Newbie" had an effect on the whole of Anglo-Saxia, since they write such nonsense ...
  37. +1
    6 December 2018 20: 45
    But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a crushing counterattack."


    And will this America be by then?
  38. 0
    6 December 2018 20: 46
    But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a devastating counterattack" that the Russian army "cannot resist."
    And where, in their opinion, their saviors are going to be unloaded. Could it be in the ports. After the cancellation of the INF Treaty, this is very important. Naive transgender people seem to have no idea that China will definitely take advantage of the moment to show who is the boss in Taiwan. They will even send a certain amount of forces to help the Russian army. No, not to defend the territory of the Russian Federation, from the task of diverting the maximum forces of the enemy, and the main blow will be on Taiwan. The Daily Express will probably not write about such a HappyEnd.
  39. -1
    6 December 2018 20: 54
    Let's "conquer" something, but - and so we are accused of everything, sanctions are dumped, "they are called earthworms." Well, what are we waiting for, it's still not something to love, they won't even be treated normally until they get a tarpaulin boot from our soldier in the face, well, what is "not enough for us to be completely happy" - Norway or Finland, maybe already completely erase Poland from the world map? And what - all of them should be given a week to evacuate to Naglia or Canada, but at least we will build a normal road and something else to Berlin and not bypassing and will carry goods there by ships)).
    Who asked "but what, there is still a Tribaltika there?" - and who is interested in the opinion of these "sprats" laughing can "consider themselves Poles" and blame them too (where a third of them have already left), they do not want to - let them "go to the forests" and "await release")) laughing
    1. 0
      6 December 2018 21: 11
      Well said colleague
  40. +1
    6 December 2018 21: 05
    Yes, they always predict something, ayu velkam that cyberia, we have -37 in the afternoon, wind is 8m / s and humidity is 70%, the technique can survive them, and soldiers?
  41. +2
    6 December 2018 21: 07
    I remember the Anglo-Saxons, Cognac and Adik the madman said that too. And where are they now? I think this time, we are already sure, to the foundation ....
  42. +1
    6 December 2018 21: 33
    Therefore, the most vulnerable, in the event of a "Russian attack", become the Baltic countries, which will not be able to withstand the Russian army. But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a crushing counterattack."

    Here are the most important lines. Baltic yeast, you need to sell you weapons, build bases, send the military. Fork out. Russia is close!
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. +2
    6 December 2018 21: 45
    ...... But while the armies of the powerful Baltic states-dwarfs will bravely resist 12 minutes 36 seconds ....... And how long will Her Majesty's troops hold out, when inflicting on the island exclusively forcing "peace and silence" strikes, a little nuclear missiles? Nonsense of a drunken ale of cheap zhurnalyugi!
  45. 0
    6 December 2018 21: 49
    Another Fuhrer conqueror ..
  46. 0
    6 December 2018 21: 55
    On the other hand, the authors admit, the main forces of the alliance are in the United States, which is very far from Europe. Therefore, the Baltic countries become the most vulnerable in the event of a "Russian attack"

    All STE "digging" near Kaliningrad
  47. 0
    6 December 2018 21: 56
    British scientists, British police (puppy arrest), now British experts. You will involuntarily think about it, maybe they really sprayed something on them ...
  48. 0
    6 December 2018 22: 07
    These articles prepare the population for the idea that a war with Russia should happen soon and they have nothing to fear, I agree the cannon fodder NATO should be ready for euthanasia
  49. -1
    6 December 2018 22: 09
    Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
    ..... And how long will Her Majesty's troops hold out, while delivering on the island exclusively forcing strikes to "peace and silence", with a little nuclear missiles?


    And the fact that the same "toys" will fly in our direction, have you ever thought about it? Here I read all the comments - well, 90% of complete nonsense. And, what is most interesting, if a really serious mess happens, all these couch "uryapatriots" will have to be caught with dogs for recruiting stations. "Zampolity", damn it: he closed his mouth, removed the workplace, and others will fight. laughing
    1. 0
      7 December 2018 00: 07
      Katz offers to surrender?
  50. 0
    6 December 2018 22: 43
    The power of the army of countries is proportional to the budget for military spending ...
  51. +1
    6 December 2018 23: 08
    There will be no winners or losers. One mass grave for everyone.
  52. 0
    6 December 2018 23: 18
    Quote: Sea Cat
    Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
    ..... And how long will Her Majesty's troops hold out, while delivering on the island exclusively forcing strikes to "peace and silence", with a little nuclear missiles?


    I re-read all the comments - well, 90% of them are complete nonsense. And, what’s most interesting, if a really serious mess happens, all these armchair “Uriapatriots” at the recruiting stations will have to be caught with dogs.

    Before the Second World War, armchair strategists also promised to defeat Germany in one or two weeks or up to a month.
    However, the army lost 8 people in the first six months of the war.
    2 people were killed and wounded (100% of all losses).
    3 800 000 - prisoners (about 45% of all losses).
    1 - 000 - deserters evading the front and captivity
    (together with prisoners - 56-62% of all losses).,,


    We must believe Marshal Zhukov and Mikoyan: thanks to US supplies in 1941. managed to restore the lost weapons.
    Marshal Zhukov:
    “But it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us so much material, without which we would not have been able to form our reserves and would not have been able to continue the war...
    We had no explosives, gunpowder.
    There was nothing to equip rifle cartridges. The Americans really helped us out with gunpowder, explosives.
    And how much they drove us to sheet steel!
    How could we quickly start producing tanks if it weren't for American help with steel? ,,

    Mikoyan:
    ,
    “Now it’s easy to say that Lend-Lease meant nothing. It ceased to be of great importance much later.
    But in the fall of 1941 we lost everything, and if it weren’t for Lend-Lease, weapons, food, warm clothes for the army and other supplies, the question is how things would have turned out.”

    By the way, Hero Pokryshkin accomplished his feats three times on the American Bell P-39 Airacobra aircraft
    1. +1
      7 December 2018 00: 02
      Not only on the Airacobra (which was not adopted by the Anglo-Saxon countries, because they did not know how to get out of a flat spin). But the Russians are pilots of God, they don’t care that they can’t spin - they managed to use even such a crude product of the American aviation industry!
      "In the winter of 1941, Pokryshkin, flying a MiG-3, took off despite the mud and rain after two other pilots crashed trying to take off. His mission was to locate von Kleist's tanks, which were stopped in front of the city of Shakhty and were then lost by Soviet intelligence.After he, despite running out of fuel and difficult weather conditions, was able to return and report this important information, he was awarded the Order of Lenin.
      By mid-November 1941, he had flown 190 sorties, including the vast majority - 144 sorties - to attack enemy ground forces. In June-December 1941, he shot down 2 German planes personally and 1 in a group." Learn history!
    2. -1
      7 December 2018 00: 10
      Exactly. "since the Russian army has only 1 million military personnel, and the alliance has 2 million. In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in the amount of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft, the Russian army can field only 3 thousand 914 units."
      And where are the fairy tales??? If anyone is told fairy tales, it is only to Russians. Like in 1940. Then they retreated for two years with the full contentment of Shanglia. After 20 million dead and defeated, the Strategic Missile Forces are bragging - they have no head. According to the START-1 treaty, the number of carriers was reduced by 20 times. Their power is five times. And they gave all the previously secret telemetry to the Americans and taught them how to use it. START-1 destroyed the Strategic Missile Forces, and until Gorbachev is put on trial for START-1, those who are emotionally minded can boast in the comments. And the capabilities of nuclear weapons are overestimated in the press by an order of magnitude - this is an NSA project,
  53. 0
    7 December 2018 00: 06
    This “research” is just “business”, relying on idiots who are afraid of everything at once, that is, ordinary people, that is, burghers, a synonym for bourgeois.
  54. 0
    7 December 2018 00: 13
    The outcome of such wars is generally not predictable, so they are babbles!
  55. -1
    7 December 2018 00: 13
    Quote: Dedrusav
    Katz offers to surrender?


    All questions to Katz, dear grandfather. Discuss this issue with him (or them). I was trained in the SA for three years and was prepared very well. The whole question is what to fight for. Fight for the Abramovichs, together with the Kremlin mob, yourself. They'll have fun. hi
  56. 0
    7 December 2018 00: 32
    How is this a defeat? At best, for NATO it will be a draw (mutual destruction), and in 10 years Russia with its multiple S-500s and powerful China will be against NATO, in which by that time only the crisis USA with outdated weapons, Britain, Poland and great Estonia will remain , Russia + China can defeat Nata
  57. -1
    7 December 2018 04: 44
    Many people here rely on our nuclear weapons. Question: gentlemen, are you sure that our leadership has the determination to apply it?
  58. 0
    7 December 2018 05: 01
    I'm afraid that in the event of a war between Russia and NATO there will be no winners...
    And all this hype is needed to justify the high military budget.
  59. -1
    7 December 2018 07: 32
    There is no need for war with such rulers.
  60. 0
    7 December 2018 07: 41
    NATO surpasses Russia in the number of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft, the Russian army can field only 3 thousand 914 units.

    You can’t argue with that, + AA helicopters and attack UAVs.....NATO, absolute air superiority, at least before the start of “work” against Russian air defense targets....
    The only thing Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can put up 20 of thousands of military vehicles.

    There is no advantage. Because we no longer have 20 tanks, approximately 000 -10, taking into account such rarities as the T-000, - 12 and early modifications of the T-000 stored at armored vehicle bases, so by quantitative and nabout quality indicator we are behind from the total number tanks of countries all NATO countries...
    1. +1
      7 December 2018 08: 50
      Quote: Lara Croft
      all NATO countries...


      For some reason I’m not sure that all of Nata will attack. I understand defense - this is a matter that, like it or not, we need to work together. But an attack is when you get into it, as if with a group, but you only care that you don’t get an answer in your face, and then you think about why you’re getting into this fight.
  61. 0
    7 December 2018 08: 46
    Therefore, the most vulnerable in the event of a “Russian attack” are the Baltic countries, which will not be able to resist the Russian army. But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will “carry out a crushing counterattack” that the Russian army “will not be able to resist.”
    I didn’t know that the USA had supersonic transport aircraft. After all, there is no other way to reach the end of the confrontation between the Baltic countries and Russia.
  62. -1
    7 December 2018 09: 16
    Quote: Dedrusav
    Not only on the Airacobra (which was not adopted by the Anglo-Saxon countries, because they did not know how to get out of a flat spin). But the Russians are pilots of God, they don’t care that they can’t spin - they managed to use even such a crude product of the American aviation industry!
    "In the winter of 1941, Pokryshkin, flying a MiG-3, took off despite the mud and rain after two other pilots crashed trying to take off. His mission was to locate von Kleist's tanks, which were stopped in front of the city of Shakhty and were then lost by Soviet intelligence.After he, despite running out of fuel and difficult weather conditions, was able to return and report this important information, he was awarded the Order of Lenin.
    By mid-November 1941, he had flown 190 sorties, including the vast majority - 144 sorties - to attack enemy ground forces. In June-December 1941, he shot down 2 German planes personally and 1 in a group." Learn history!

    You need to learn history, Pokryshkin shot down 48 out of 59 planes in an American Airacobra:
    Flying the Airacobra, Pokryshkin shot down 1943 enemy aircraft in the spring of 48, bringing his personal victories to 59 aircraft.

    https://topwar.ru/13676-pokryshkin-aleksandr-ivanovich-i-ego-istrebitel-bell-p-39-airacobra.html
  63. 0
    7 December 2018 09: 37
    Dumb and dumber people work in a small British tabloid. You can safely write off half of your aviation as incapable of taking off. For example, take Germany's Air Force No. 1. Plus our air defense, plus technical characteristics and so on. But this is not the main thing, the main thing is something else - who will fight for NATO on earth? Czechs, Hungarians, Germans, Italians, French, who? Apart from the stoned Poles and the stoned “mighty” Tribalts with the striped ones, there is no one to fight. We won’t fight them hand-to-hand like on Lake Peipus. They will simply be destroyed without even seeing a living enemy, and then there will be a cleanup. Breathe deeply and calm down, and you will be happy to live on our sinful earth.
  64. 0
    7 December 2018 10: 30
    I dare to ask what 13 thousand is. aircraft? And how many of these aircraft will be able to actually take to the skies and conduct combat operations? And this next Cassandra completely forgot about the best air defense in the world, this is about Russia......
  65. 0
    7 December 2018 10: 45
    The science fiction writer forgets that as soon as the “main forces” behind the puddle begin to prepare en masse for transfer, nuclear weapons will crash there without any threats and they will remain there. “A threat to the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation” is enough to make a decision on an attack against the aggressor, so that any massive movement for NATO exercises is discussed in advance and 10 times. However, the article contains a grain of truth about the eternal strategy of the Anglo-Saxons: “ten of us dared, but one of us ate his tongue.”
  66. 0
    7 December 2018 12: 19
    Especially if the British are in the first rank! Everything is crazy! You motherfuckers, you have at least done something smart and useful to people in the entire history of your existence (culture and art don’t count), because all you can do is crap. The Englishwoman is shitting.
  67. 0
    7 December 2018 13: 00
    Maybe America and Britain will accomplish something, but they won’t know it themselves!
  68. +1
    7 December 2018 14: 20
    Articles like this amaze me! In what war? In what territory? If we go on the defensive and NATO attacks us, then we can laugh.... If at a distant theater, then we don’t need to laugh, but we need to cry.
  69. -1
    7 December 2018 17: 32
    Yes ! Russia will not be able to resist the forces of the alliance, because how can our leadership fight with itself. Everything that our government has is located over there, over the hill, in short, on the territory of “our enemies.” They are simply telling us lies about defending Russia. People !!! Don’t you see, the country has long been sold, and we are serfs who extract all the minerals for the West and by selling them, our government profits and leaves everything on the territory of “our enemies.” And you still continue to argue about who will win and who will lose. Russia also lost when the Kursk sank. You saw with what cynicism Putin responded “she drowned.” If our people do not revive the USSR, you can bury all your dreams!
  70. 0
    7 December 2018 19: 21
    there was one such analyst at 41, he came home and had to be escorted home
  71. 0
    7 December 2018 20: 49
    Well, why the hell are they agitating their citizens with the Russian threat? They burn themselves.
  72. 0
    7 December 2018 23: 10
    I can't understand what's funny about this. With such articles, the plebs are accustomed to the idea that nothing bad will happen if we (in the sense of the West) attack Russia. Those. at the right moment, the plebs will unanimously support the start of the war. By the way, this was the case in the Third Reich: after all, all the people, well, except for the communists, supported Aloizych. But the current plebs know nothing about this... unfortunately
  73. 0
    8 December 2018 01: 09
    The British need to use their brains, otherwise they clearly don’t understand.
    A NATO war against Russia will be the last war for all living things and the Earth as such.
    The only people it will please are astronomers who will appear on Venus in a couple of hundred million years.
    They will also need to explain to the Venusian public why there are two asteroid belts in the solar system. One between Venus and Mars and the second behind Mars...
  74. 0
    8 December 2018 19: 32
    British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

    In the event of aggression against Russia, Britain and the entire European NATO will become part of Russia. The USA will be destroyed, because there will be no time to introduce the Russian Orthodox Christian into Russia due to the great distance of the USA from Russia. It will be easier to destroy the USA. And the nearby territories - the Baltic states, Poland, Britain - European NATO - will be included in Russian Orthodox Christian Russia and will become Russian Orthodox Christian Russia.
  75. 0
    8 December 2018 19: 48
    Quote: Lara Croft
    NATO surpasses Russia in the number of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft, the Russian army can field only 3 thousand 914 units.

    You can’t argue with that, + AA helicopters and attack UAVs.....NATO, absolute air superiority, at least before the start of “work” against Russian air defense targets....
    The only thing Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can put up 20 of thousands of military vehicles.

    There is no advantage. Because we no longer have 20 tanks, approximately 000 -10, taking into account such rarities as the T-000, - 12 and early modifications of the T-000 stored at armored vehicle bases, so by quantitative and nabout quality indicator we are behind from the total number tanks of countries all NATO countries...



    The worst thing about this situation is that Chubais and company took all strategic reserves to the West and destroyed industry. We are now working on the skeletons of the USSR industry. And we will not be able to sharply increase the output of military products...