Military Review

British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

151
More and more often, materials appear in the Western press in which the authors try to compare Russia's military capabilities with the NATO bloc or with the United States. Most of the “researchers” data on the Russian army, apparently, are taken from the same Western media, and therefore some articles cannot be read without laughing. This time, the British tabloid Daily Express undertook to compare the capabilities of the Russian army and NATO forces, the translation is presented by "RT".


British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO


The authors of the "research" from the Daily Express, having studied the data on the Russian armed forces and compared them with the data on the NATO army, came to the unequivocal conclusion that Russia allegedly would not be able to resist the forces of the alliance. According to British analysts, NATO forces have an advantage over Russia in terms of personnel, since the Russian army has only 1 million servicemen, and the alliance has 2 million.In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in terms of the number of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft the Russian army can only deploy 3 units. The only thing that Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can deploy 20 thousand combat vehicles.

On the other hand, the authors admit that the main forces of the alliance are in the USA, and this is very far from Europe. Therefore, the Baltic countries, which will not be able to withstand the Russian army, become the most vulnerable in the event of a “Russian attack”. But as long as they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO "will conduct a crushing counter-attack," which the Russian army "cannot counter." In the end, losing the war, Russia will threaten to use nuclear weapon.

Here is a "military research" published a British tabloid. The level of British "military experts" is just suitable for writing terrible tales with a military bias, but a good ending especially for the European population. And in Europe, such fairy tales love and, most importantly, believe in them.
Photos used:
https://yandex.ru/images
151 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. LeonidL
    LeonidL 6 December 2018 17: 50
    +10
    ABOUT! Another soothsayer!
    1. Evdokim
      Evdokim 6 December 2018 17: 55
      +20
      Quote: LeonidL
      ABOUT! Another soothsayer!

      Not a soothsayer, but a stoned finger. hi
      1. 41 REGION
        41 REGION 6 December 2018 17: 59
        +10
        And in Europe, they love such tales and, most importantly, believe in them.
        Then you need more tales. yes The more they believe in their exclusivity, the more mistakes they make .....
        1. krot
          krot 6 December 2018 19: 19
          +4
          Without Russia, land is not needed! They should understand this for a long time! This is of course to the extreme, but anything happens. We’ll bang Europe in years .. We’ll drown Britain)
      2. Rushnairfors
        Rushnairfors 6 December 2018 18: 13
        +7
        Can we just suck? There are many of these in Europe .....
        1. novel66
          novel66 6 December 2018 20: 45
          +4
          ABOUT! intolerance?
          1. Vanek
            Vanek 7 December 2018 03: 51
            +1
            Quote: novel xnumx
            ABOUT! intolerance?


            Absolute impunity. laughing lol

            For tolerance, this is exactly the same for the savers.

            Novel hi
      3. NEXUS
        NEXUS 6 December 2018 21: 16
        +6
        The only thing Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can put up 20 of thousands of military vehicles.

        These ANALYTICS can give any numbers ... just forgot about the Russian nuclear weapons, which can multiply Europe and the USA in the literal sense of the word. I'm not talking about England, which will be washed into the ocean.
      4. Sanichsan
        Sanichsan 7 December 2018 17: 26
        0
        Quote: Evdokim
        Not a soothsayer, but a stoned finger.

        there is doubt it was a finger ... hi
    2. the most important
      the most important 6 December 2018 17: 55
      +13
      Quote: LeonidL

      ABOUT! Another soothsayer!

      Especially funny about the resistance in the Baltic countries fool fool Resist before lunch and surrender together. And the Americans will open the second front only in three years ... and earlier they will not succeed!
      1. cniza
        cniza 6 December 2018 20: 24
        +2
        The Baltic "lions" will definitely remain out of work.
      2. Vanek
        Vanek 7 December 2018 03: 53
        +1
        Quote: the most important
        Resist before lunch and surrender together


        Иmitation Бballot box Дactivities.
    3. Halado Romane
      Halado Romane 6 December 2018 17: 58
      +7
      In the British tabloid all malacholny!
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 6 December 2018 18: 14
        +5
        Quote: Halado romance
        In the British tabloid all malacholny!

        And hay steal on their dragon am
      2. antivirus
        antivirus 6 December 2018 18: 50
        +1
        they will not go beyond the borders of NATO-- the right kind of beer - no, no toilets.
        discomfort will not be tolerated.
        It’s easier for them to surrender themselves and stay close to their favorite beer.
        and how they will work in captivity in Kolyma - it's just horror, ale freezes
        1. cniza
          cniza 6 December 2018 20: 23
          +2
          And we don’t distribute ice cream only if it’s natural.
    4. credo
      credo 6 December 2018 18: 00
      +12
      Quote: LeonidL
      ABOUT! Another soothsayer!


      No, everything is much simpler and this is described in the end of the article ...

      "... This is a" military study "published by a British tabloid. The level of British" military experts "is just right for writing scary tales with a military bias, but a good ending especially for the European population. And in Europe, such tales are loved and, most importantly, believe in them ... "

      Considering that the world media, including the British, are under the control of the United States, another fairy tale fits very well on the theme that only the United States (and the NATO bloc) can help the poor Europeans, so there is no need to invent anything about the European army and even make attempts on this score, but simply believe in the power of the United States and its "mission of good", along the way buying all VO exclusively from the same United States.
    5. Svarog
      Svarog 6 December 2018 18: 00
      +9
      All tabloids need to make it a rule to provide historical information .. In which year they went to Russia, what was the ratio, how they raked, how they repented and how Russia, nobly, allocated two meters of land to everyone ..
      1. credo
        credo 6 December 2018 18: 22
        +9
        Quote: Svarog
        All tabloids need to make it a rule to provide historical information .. In which year they went to Russia, what was the ratio, how they raked, how they repented and how Russia, nobly, allocated two meters of land to everyone ..

        History teaches that if you get burned by taking a hot pan with your bare hand, then the next time you either take it with a tack or a thick mitten. Behind a large puddle, too, are not fools, although they are too arrogant and arrogant, therefore, since their goal has remained unchanged for many decades and centuries, then you should not flaunt them in good shape, but you definitely need to prepare for battle.
        1. Svarog
          Svarog 6 December 2018 18: 43
          +6
          Quote: credo
          History teaches that if you get burned by taking a red-hot pan with your bare hand, then the next time you either take it with a tack or a thick mitten

          So the joke is that their history does not teach anything .. As long as we have nuclear weapons, no one will fight with us. I am convinced of this. They want to fight the Ukrainians, Poles and the Baltic states against us .. But at the expense of victory, seriously, I'm not sure .. this time. It really hurts the public, which at the head of the state is muddy with us .. More than half have dual citizenship, almost all children live behind enemy lines ..
          1. mig29mks
            mig29mks 6 December 2018 19: 13
            +5
            I agree, our elite is very muddy, their children are held hostage by the West, by their will or against?
        2. SSR
          SSR 6 December 2018 19: 15
          +1
          Quote: credo
          History teaches that if you get burned by taking a hot pan with your bare hand, then the next time you either take it with a tack or a thick mitten.

          Are you talking about us or them? If about them, then they got off with light burns and we were burned to the bone, the grasp and gloves should be thicker.
          Neither the 41st nor Beslan, we should not allow it anymore, they are used to doing everything with the wrong hands.
          1. cniza
            cniza 6 December 2018 20: 23
            +1
            I hope we learned the lessons well.
        3. stalki
          stalki 6 December 2018 21: 48
          +1
          but it’s necessary to prepare for battle.
          precisely because we are getting ready (and the West overlooked it at the time) this is the very reason why bile is pouring and military scum is gathering from all over the world. Let them arrange a bacchanalia further, and we will calmly improve our army. Step by step, without any fuss.
      2. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 6 December 2018 19: 33
        +2
        Quote: Svarog
        All tabloids need to make it a rule to provide historical information .. In which year they went to Russia, what was the ratio, how they raked, how they repented and how Russia, nobly, allocated two meters of land to everyone ..

        Or ask the predecessor, who was slightly torn and ate poison
        ...
    6. viralig
      viralig 6 December 2018 18: 32
      +5
      Not. Another custom article. You can boast of muscles as much as you like. But in fact - even if you take apart from what he wrote.
      1) It’s not a fact that this help will be able to get across the Atlantic, and not rest on the vast expanses of the oceans, and even if it gets there in parts, and these parts will just go in waves and not all at once.
      2) Until they get there - their main trump card - navigation satellites will order a long life. And without them, their high-tech equipment is largely dead.
      3) Belarus and Kazakhstan will not stand aside either.
      4) To them, then bish NATO, we meddle at all is not a reason - we do not need them like their territory. The main thing is that they themselves do not climb. Accordingly, they will attack, and this is a completely different calico. And the answer as a hot nuclear kiss will not be inevitable. No one will scare them, just the key to the start.
      So all the research data and topics - eggs are not worth it.
      1. Kito
        Kito 7 December 2018 09: 12
        0
        I agree with you, but not completely, I very much doubt that Kazakhstan will fit ..
        And yes, you are right, V.P. Putin made it clear that in the event of external aggression, we reserve the right to deliver a preventive nuclear strike. You don’t need to be a genius to think logically to come to the conclusion that in case of war the warring parties will fight with the weapons and ammunition that were at the beginning, since all the important components of economic structures that can produce military products will be destroyed first and foremost .d
    7. HOMUT1430
      HOMUT1430 7 December 2018 00: 25
      +2
      hearing about British experts is already becoming more fun
  2. A good one
    A good one 6 December 2018 17: 54
    +6
    The theme for these hacks is a win-win, they will always print, they will always pay.
    1. SSR
      SSR 6 December 2018 19: 24
      +2
      Quote: Not bad
      The theme for these hacks is a win-win, they will always print, they will always pay.

      So before the Crimean War, their media raised such a wave that from dockers to sirs, they went in droves with a newspaper in their hands and chanted - to the Crimea!
  3. 210ox
    210ox 6 December 2018 18: 03
    +6
    I know only one thing. There will be no winners in such a war. When it comes to nuclear weapons
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 6 December 2018 18: 15
      +5
      Quote: 210ox
      When it comes to nuclear weapons

      In their place, I would pray earnestly that God forbid the Russians did not use Soviet tactics - when the enemy's defense area is burned out with the help of TNW and these same tanks "which are more" and motorized rifle units on armor rush into this gap, which can go everywhere, unlike some forty-ton irons.
  4. Comrade Beria
    Comrade Beria 6 December 2018 18: 05
    +7
    Not so much nuclear weapons are needed for Britain, so that geographic maps would later be corrected.
    And let analysts of this kind remember this phrase:
    Why do we need a world in which Russia will not be
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 21
      +2
      Yes, don’t waste weapons on them, they will wash them off in a wave.
  5. Gunxnumx
    Gunxnumx 6 December 2018 18: 07
    +10
    Vladimir Putin tried to reassure the Europeans by declaring that there is no need to be afraid of Russia. Our military budget is incomparable with the similar expenses of NATO, the Russian leader says. Only a sick person could think that the Russian Federation is capable of aggression, with a significant lag in the overall potential. "
    This is an excerpt from https://www.google.kz/amp/s/free-news.su/politika/1957-rossija-ne-napadet-na-nato/amp
    Surprisingly, they still have not realized that in the event of a threat to the existence of Russia, a nuclear strike will be delivered on everyone, including the United States. Further along Zadornov and Lavrov.
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 21
      +2
      It will, but it may be too late.
  6. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 6 December 2018 18: 07
    +1
    most importantly, the United States will not fight, for this it’s NATO and it is. The Yankees will throw up arms and ammunition, they can catch mercenaries, they will interfere and harm in every way, but they themselves will go into war when for example, there will be a turning point in favor of NATO, but, then we will have to use the last argument, a thermonuclear weapon.
    1. Hagalaz
      Hagalaz 6 December 2018 18: 46
      +2
      Quote: ANCIENT
      most importantly, the United States will not fight; for this, it’s the NATO. The Yankees will throw weapons and ammunition ......

      It is possible that more and the fat will be removed from this.
  7. Tusv
    Tusv 6 December 2018 18: 09
    +6
    The level of British "military experts"

    Corresponds to the level of "British scientists" - So what, what nonsense. They pay money, and okay. In the meantime, when the Bear growls, everyone stands on the circus and barks. Even the Americans. Continent Nash and nemnogo Chinese, the rest of the peninsula and islands. And who told you that the Russians are fighting by your rules fool
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 20
      +6
      They forgot that when the war, then we cancel all the rules.
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 6 December 2018 21: 05
        +2
        Quote: cniza
        They forgot that when the war, then we cancel all the rules

        That's right. The rules are not any but the Yankees are better off swimming further from our anger.
        You would know that My Wife is regarding Yankee. It's very scary. I’ll raise and bring up
        1. cniza
          cniza 6 December 2018 21: 08
          +2
          Yeah, and do not even glance in our direction.
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 6 December 2018 22: 12
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            Yeah, and do not even glance in our direction.

            Not. I am very kind and my wife is much kinder, but only! Bourgeois live happily over the hill and still don’t do my nerve hi bully
  8. Restless
    Restless 6 December 2018 18: 13
    +6
    tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

    Surprised, here on our website they constantly write this, in recent years ... crying
    But we still do not give up here and in general, despite the persecution of Russia and all of us ..
    Let them snoop .. This time, we will not spare anyone and the tanks will not stop .. (you can kick ..)))
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 19
      +3
      Rather, we are not on the surrender, but they all demand.
      1. Restless
        Restless 6 December 2018 20: 47
        +4
        Quote: cniza
        Rather, we are not on the surrender, but they all demand.

        laughing good Oh how they demand ..

        Well, we live on the edge .. soldier
        1. cniza
          cniza 6 December 2018 20: 52
          +1
          The main thing is that no one is bored.
  9. Cry
    Cry 6 December 2018 18: 15
    +2
    The war will go on in Europe, and not in America, and the EU states will have to fight alone, and the dwarf STATES will simply throw a bulldozer into the Baltic to feed the sprats. All western million-plus cities will be wiped off the face of the Earth by both American and Russian missiles during the first attacks, so they will have to flee south to Africa, where they will make the cradle of mankind happy and EVERYTHING will have to start with a club in hand.
    1. igorbrsv
      igorbrsv 6 December 2018 18: 36
      +1
      By the way, the chances of survival on the African continent are pretty good. If I were the oligarchs, I would have staked out "African" citizenship
      1. BARKHAN
        BARKHAN 6 December 2018 19: 36
        +1
        Quote: igorbrsv
        By the way, the chances of survival on the African continent are pretty good. If I were the oligarchs, I would have staked out "African" citizenship

        The Chinese also think so
      2. Cry
        Cry 7 December 2018 02: 51
        +2
        They will be there white gods or eat them, like Cook.
        1. NordUral
          NordUral 8 December 2018 16: 16
          -1
          Rather, they eat, they themselves have nothing to eat.
      3. Rzzz
        Rzzz 7 December 2018 08: 33
        0
        Quote: igorbrsv
        By the way, the chances of surviving on the African continent are pretty good.


        I would say on the contrary, very weak. Now Africa is being held back by the "white" countries, mainly the one overseas. It is beneficial for them to keep African countries in a primitive poverty state. These are easier to manage, and to develop natural resources that are dofig out there.
        What happens after the apocalypse? When this external power weakens or disappears. It seems to me that everything will change quite a lot, and everything will be remembered to the white man. I would not expect to survive there.
        1. NordUral
          NordUral 8 December 2018 16: 18
          -1
          Rzzz! I agree with you! African immigration to Europe is just flowers. And at home they will quickly explain who the boss is. South Africa must be remembered.
        2. Cry
          Cry 9 December 2018 07: 45
          0
          What seems to you quite likely with a single correction: after the third world, you will have to go back to your ancestors and start looking for a place under the sun with a baton.
          1. Rzzz
            Rzzz 9 December 2018 16: 36
            0
            Yes, no, those regions where edrenny bombs will not be thrown hundreds, they will not suffer much. So consider Africa, South America, Australia and Oceania, part of Southeast Asia - will be almost unaffected and suitable for living. But civilization will roll back very strongly, of course.
            1. Cry
              Cry 9 December 2018 17: 47
              0
              I agree, but the civilized ones will slide to their level in a primitive communal system, where the value is not a dollar, but a piece of bread or a handful of rice that you will get with a baton, since cartridges, gunpowder, production for their manufacture will disappear, pizza too.
              1. Rzzz
                Rzzz 9 December 2018 20: 03
                0
                Well, not to the primitive. I think - somewhere at the level of the first half of the twentieth century. Only what is now considered high technology will disappear. Electronics, computers, pharmaceuticals and weight-technology medicine. Complex chemistry and biotechnology. Well, that sort of thing. And the main technologies will not go anywhere. Digging up iron ore and coal and casting iron is not a very complicated technology. To get steel from it in an open-hearth way is more difficult, but also no fiction.
                1. Cry
                  Cry 9 December 2018 21: 00
                  0
                  Everything will undergo a radioactive infection, which means it will be unusable, so you will have to run into the cradle of humanity without pants, and in this form you will not be any different from savages. For them you will be of value as a piece of meat.
                  1. Rzzz
                    Rzzz 9 December 2018 21: 22
                    0
                    Savages also have a hard time. They are also very used to the benefits of civilization. But if we even know and know how to create these benefits, then they will not have this.

                    Quote: Choro
                    For them you will be of value as a piece of meat.

                    And you? What stand out?

                    I personally don’t bother at all and generally will not run anywhere, even if I survive. Due to some specifics of health, I am not able to live without some drugs. There will be enough reserves for several months; after the global catastrophe, there will be no where to replenish them.
                    1. Cry
                      Cry 10 December 2018 04: 28
                      0
                      Want to say that you are a living corpse?
  10. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 6 December 2018 18: 20
    +3
    Russian tabloid predicts the defeat of NATO in the war with Russia. What's next?
  11. Samara_63
    Samara_63 6 December 2018 18: 22
    +3
    It is unlikely that Berlin will be occupied in one month, in NATO the armies have become not only weak but also morally ugly ...
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 18
      +4
      But then the soldiers with painted nails.
  12. parusnik
    parusnik 6 December 2018 18: 23
    +3
    A tale for Nyusha .. they calm themselves ...
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 17
      +2
      It seems the last arguments have gone ...
  13. Every
    Every 6 December 2018 18: 24
    +2

    In the event of a NATO attack, there will be a nuclear response, they have already spoken about this a hundred times.
    Russia will not attack the Balts - what for do we need them?
    1. Restless
      Restless 6 December 2018 20: 52
      +1
      Quote: Every
      Russia will not attack the Balts - what for do we need them?

      Well, someone still has to be questioned ..And then finish! soldier
  14. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 6 December 2018 18: 37
    0
    I would advise the tabloid to re-read the newspapers of the Third Reich for 41-43
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. _Ugene_
    _Ugene_ 6 December 2018 18: 40
    +1
    British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO
    some kind of kindergarten, compare the total population of NATO countries, the total military budget, production capabilities, etc. etc., and most importantly - is Russia going to fight with NATO? They themselves came up with an achressor, they themselves predict a defeat, but let them not forget about nuclear weapons
  17. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 6 December 2018 18: 43
    +2
    Yes, the excessive consumption of beer dilutes the brain, definitely. Again the Baltic states, did the light converge on it like a wedge? And why did Poland, Romania and the Czech Republic stand aside? What about Norway? Everyone will fly by the hill, it will not seem enough. The islanders are thinking of staying behind the strait, so when we developed the PT-76. If anything, immediately wait for a visit ... laughing tongue wassat
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 16
      +2
      Well, let them dream and reason.
  18. arhPavel
    arhPavel 6 December 2018 18: 44
    0
    crying © Lavrov
    What is our analogue of this newspaper? Speedinfo or what?
  19. Archivist Vasya
    Archivist Vasya 6 December 2018 18: 53
    +1
    At least they came up with something new ... Aliens, They would drag magic, you look it will be more interesting to read))
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 15
      +1
      This is the next step and in their defense, they say they did not let Russia win.
  20. StudentVK
    StudentVK 6 December 2018 18: 53
    +1
    Well, the Anglo-Saxons are not dumb in the plan to be poured into tanks with the help of their "independent small" media. They created the RT, and even that will not be enough.
  21. Kerensky
    Kerensky 6 December 2018 18: 58
    +4
    And the Balts were immediately written off. That is, the Balts should ask NATO: "Do you admit that we have no chance?"
    And then go think ...
  22. rocket757
    rocket757 6 December 2018 19: 08
    +1
    All in one installment - British scientists, politicians, generals and magazine experts.
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 14
      +2
      In a word, experts.
  23. Cannonball
    Cannonball 6 December 2018 19: 21
    +2
    Where are we going to bury them all?
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 14
      +3
      Quote: Cannonball
      Where are we going to bury them all?


      Frequently Asked Question in Russia, for 1000 years.
  24. Felix
    Felix 6 December 2018 19: 21
    +4
    British tabloid predicts Russia's defeat in the war with NATO

    Oh well.
    How many months have a coalition been raised against Iraq? Three months? Five? At this pace, while you collect all 2 million, they will devour all the food mob reserves and spoil all the local girls ..
    And who will guard the colony of ki all this time? Do not run away?
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 13
      +3
      They did not think about this yet.
  25. APASUS
    APASUS 6 December 2018 19: 34
    +1
    It seems that the material is custom-made, the Americans are preparing the British population to fight Russia. There isn’t even any emphasis on the liberation struggle, it’s not important who attacks anyone.
    Do Americans always take on the role of procurement?
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 12
      +1
      Nobody will fight them, because their army has become tolerant ..
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 7 December 2018 19: 20
        0
        Quote: cniza
        Nobody will fight them, because their army has become tolerant ..

        These will be driven, tolerance must be worked out ....................

        God forbid, to get to such ...............
        1. cniza
          cniza 7 December 2018 20: 32
          +1
          The most terrible executioners are female, I do not specifically call them people ... and I really love women.
  26. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 6 December 2018 19: 36
    +3
    Wise guys did not take into account the main hitch: her name is a Russian peasant! BYAD will be, EVERYTHING, if he is, is very angry am
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 11
      +2
      They do not teach history, but this is their problem.
      1. The Siberian barber
        The Siberian barber 6 December 2018 20: 38
        +1
        So they need it!)))
        1. cniza
          cniza 6 December 2018 20: 49
          +2
          Maybe, but they will beg for what they beg.
          1. The Siberian barber
            The Siberian barber 6 December 2018 21: 36
            +1
            To give them their due, they know how to "beg", and receive, accordingly, occasionally wassat
            1. cniza
              cniza 6 December 2018 21: 54
              +2
              I don’t want to say this word, let’s say so, apparently they like it. lol
              1. The Siberian barber
                The Siberian barber 7 December 2018 00: 26
                +1
                Pathological tendency to "sadomaso", probably negative
                1. cniza
                  cniza 7 December 2018 09: 00
                  +2
                  Something in this direction.
  27. sds127
    sds127 6 December 2018 19: 50
    +2
    "As a result, losing the war, Russia will threaten to use nuclear weapons." (C) -that's where he neighing specifically. Explain to these "experts" that the war in the Russia-NATO format will begin with the use of nuclear weapons .... and on this the world is familiar im-will end a little. for all. IMHO
  28. BAI
    BAI 6 December 2018 19: 58
    +6
    came to the unequivocal conclusion that Russia supposedly could not resist the forces of the alliance.

    If Russia cannot win, then why are they constantly panicking?
    1. loginovich
      loginovich 6 December 2018 20: 01
      0
      The prostate is not iron.
      1. cniza
        cniza 6 December 2018 20: 10
        +2
        Quote: BAI
        came to the unequivocal conclusion that Russia supposedly could not resist the forces of the alliance.

        If Russia cannot win, then why are they constantly panicking?


        Just in case.
  29. loginovich
    loginovich 6 December 2018 20: 00
    +4
    I am more interested in whom Brylev and Solovyov will be at war, and others are not our comrades.
  30. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 6 December 2018 20: 02
    +4
    As a result, losing the war, Russia will threaten to use nuclear weapons

    First, if Russia remains able to "threaten" it means that it has not yet lost the war and is not even going to.
    Secondly, these sofa iksperds still hope to wage and win the war by conventional means.
    And thirdly: does NATO have a plan B in case Russia does not threaten to use nuclear weapons. And apply it immediately and without too much trepidation?
  31. Chuck
    Chuck 6 December 2018 20: 03
    +3
    The Anglo-Saxons would have to attend to a completely different problem - in fact, in the event of a conflict between the Russian Federation and NATO, the British Isles will be destroyed in the first place and at any subsequent outcome of this conflict for the Russian Federation.
    1. cniza
      cniza 6 December 2018 20: 10
      +5
      Yes, do not destroy them, I mean the islands, but their warrior yes ...
  32. cniza
    cniza 6 December 2018 20: 09
    +2
    According to British analysts, NATO forces have an advantage over Russia in terms of personnel, since the Russian army has only 1 million troops, and the alliance has 2 million. In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in terms of equipment in the Air Force: against 13 thousand aircraft the Russian army can put up only 3 thousand 914 units.


    How can they all forget that they are fighting not with numbers, but with skill, that was said by A.V.Suvorov.
  33. raid14
    raid14 6 December 2018 20: 13
    0
    NATO forces have an advantage over Russia in terms of personnel, since the Russian army has only 1 million troops, and the alliance has 2 million. In addition, NATO surpasses Russia in terms of equipment in the Air Force: against the 13 thousand aircraft, the Russian army can only 3 thousand. 914 units. The only thing Russia has an advantage in is tanks, the Russian army can put up 20 thousand combat vehicles.

    In addition, the ratio of NATO strategic nuclear forces is not in Russia's favor; under the CMEA-3 treaty, the reduction of strategic nuclear forces is now 1 (for Russia) to 1,8 (for NATO)
  34. faterdom
    faterdom 6 December 2018 20: 19
    +1
    But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a devastating counterattack

    Saakashvili also smoked such a baidu. Before as. Either he resisted little, or they were not in a hurry, - the fact is that "help did not come, no reinforcements were sent, in general, here's the thing: you and I ... got fucked."
  35. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 6 December 2018 20: 22
    -3
    I don’t understand one thing. Banyat for all nonsense. Here they dumped from a garbage can - slurp. Neither the author, nor the source, nor the layout. Who is the British tabloid? Who are always knocking on the scoreboard?
  36. Astronaut
    Astronaut 6 December 2018 20: 23
    0
    Looks like the "Newbie" had an effect on the whole of Anglo-Saxia, since they write such nonsense ...
  37. sir_obs
    sir_obs 6 December 2018 20: 45
    +1
    But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a crushing counterattack."


    And will this America be by then?
  38. TOR2
    TOR2 6 December 2018 20: 46
    0
    But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a devastating counterattack" that the Russian army "cannot resist."
    And where, in their opinion, their saviors are going to be unloaded. Could it be in the ports. After the cancellation of the INF Treaty, this is very important. Naive transgender people seem to have no idea that China will definitely take advantage of the moment to show who is the boss in Taiwan. They will even send a certain amount of forces to help the Russian army. No, not to defend the territory of the Russian Federation, from the task of diverting the maximum forces of the enemy, and the main blow will be on Taiwan. The Daily Express will probably not write about such a HappyEnd.
  39. Mih1974
    Mih1974 6 December 2018 20: 54
    -1
    Let's "conquer" something, but - and so we are accused of everything, sanctions are dumped, "they are called earthworms." Well, what are we waiting for, it's still not something to love, they won't even be treated normally until they get a tarpaulin boot from our soldier in the face, well, what is "not enough for us to be completely happy" - Norway or Finland, maybe already completely erase Poland from the world map? And what - all of them should be given a week to evacuate to Naglia or Canada, but at least we will build a normal road and something else to Berlin and not bypassing and will carry goods there by ships)).
    Who asked "but what, there is still a Tribaltika there?" - and who is interested in the opinion of these "sprats" laughing can "consider themselves Poles" and blame them too (where a third of them have already left), they do not want to - let them "go to the forests" and "await release")) laughing
    1. DeGreen
      DeGreen 6 December 2018 21: 11
      0
      Well said colleague
  40. yustas
    yustas 6 December 2018 21: 05
    +1
    Yes, they always predict something, ayu velkam that cyberia, we have -37 in the afternoon, wind is 8m / s and humidity is 70%, the technique can survive them, and soldiers?
  41. DeGreen
    DeGreen 6 December 2018 21: 07
    +2
    I remember the Anglo-Saxons, Cognac and Adik the madman said that too. And where are they now? I think this time, we are already sure, to the foundation ....
  42. slavaseven
    slavaseven 6 December 2018 21: 33
    +1
    Therefore, the most vulnerable, in the event of a "Russian attack", become the Baltic countries, which will not be able to withstand the Russian army. But while they resist, American forces will arrive, after which NATO will "launch a crushing counterattack."

    Here are the most important lines. Baltic yeast, you need to sell you weapons, build bases, send the military. Fork out. Russia is close!
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
    Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira 6 December 2018 21: 45
    +2
    ...... But while the armies of the powerful Baltic states-dwarfs will bravely resist 12 minutes 36 seconds ....... And how long will Her Majesty's troops hold out, when inflicting on the island exclusively forcing "peace and silence" strikes, a little nuclear missiles? Nonsense of a drunken ale of cheap zhurnalyugi!
  45. Alex Nevs
    Alex Nevs 6 December 2018 21: 49
    0
    Another Fuhrer conqueror ..
  46. tarakan
    tarakan 6 December 2018 21: 55
    0
    On the other hand, the authors admit, the main forces of the alliance are in the United States, which is very far from Europe. Therefore, the Baltic countries become the most vulnerable in the event of a "Russian attack"

    All STE "digging" near Kaliningrad
  47. Fgup
    Fgup 6 December 2018 21: 56
    0
    British scientists, British police (puppy arrest), now British experts. You will involuntarily think about it, maybe they really sprayed something on them ...
  48. Fantazer911
    Fantazer911 6 December 2018 22: 07
    0
    These articles prepare the population for the idea that a war with Russia should happen soon and they have nothing to fear, I agree the cannon fodder NATO should be ready for euthanasia
  49. Catfish
    Catfish 6 December 2018 22: 09
    -1
    Quote: Sebastian Aristarkhovich Pereira
    ..... And how long will Her Majesty's troops hold out, while delivering on the island exclusively forcing strikes to "peace and silence", with a little nuclear missiles?


    And the fact that the same "toys" will fly in our direction, have you ever thought about it? Here I read all the comments - well, 90% of complete nonsense. And, what is most interesting, if a really serious mess happens, all these couch "uryapatriots" will have to be caught with dogs for recruiting stations. "Zampolity", damn it: he closed his mouth, removed the workplace, and others will fight. laughing
    1. Dedrusav
      Dedrusav 7 December 2018 00: 07
      0
      Katz offers to surrender?
  50. high
    high 6 December 2018 22: 43
    0
    The power of the army of countries is proportional to the budget for military spending ...