Will robots change ground combat paradigm?

23
Dull, dirty and dangerous work is still the raison d'être of remotely operated machines, even when these systems are developing rapidly. The value of such platforms, originally used mainly for reconnaissance at close range and for neutralizing explosive objects, is constantly growing. The scope of their activities is gradually expanding, they perform tasks not only logistical support, including the supply of ammunition and evacuation of the wounded, but also combat support in the case of installing weapon systems.


Uranium-9 at the stand of the Kalashnikov Concern at the exhibition Army 2018; This remote-controlled vehicle has passed military tests in Syria.



The operating experience of remotely controlled machines (DMM) has influenced the change of some priorities aimed at reducing the logistic load and increasing the flexibility of application. The military is currently looking for systems that can use a common universal controller, have a single chassis configuration that allows you to take a different target load, that is, platforms with an increased level of modularity.

The choice of DUMs on the market is extremely diverse, ranging from nanomachines to heavy multi-ton systems. In the same article, the latter will be considered, especially those equipped with one or another weapon system. Armed Robots are the subject of fierce discussions related to ethical, legal issues, etc., although some countries have already begun to deploy them, mainly for evaluation and development of the concept of combat use. For example, in May 2018, the Deputy Minister of Defense confirmed that the armed Uran-9 SAM, developed by the 766 Production and Technological Equipment Department, was deployed to Syria for testing. From the report of the Ministry of Defense it follows that these combat tests of the complex revealed shortcomings in its control, mobility, firepower, intelligence and observation functions.


Tower military multifunctional robot Uran-9. Its armament is equivalent to the armament of the BMP: 30-mm cannon, launchers of unguided and anti-tank guided missiles

Uranium-9 from Russia

The Uran-9 combat multifunctional robotic complex is armed with an 30-mm 2А72 automatic cannon, an 9,62-mm PKT / PTKM machine gun coupled to it and four Attack 9М120-1 machine gun. As an option, the Uglyn-9 anti-aircraft complex “Igla” or the Kornet-M ATGM can be installed. At the 2018 Army exhibition, this robot was presented in an updated version, equipped with two six-barrel Shmel-M installations for firing Shmel-PRO missiles with thermobaric (PRO-A) or incendiary (PRO-3) warheads. Robot Uranus-9 Able to move off-road at a speed of 10 km / h, the maximum speed is 25 km / h, it can be controlled via radio from a mobile control station located less than three kilometers away. This machine has quite impressive dimensions: the length of the 5,1 meter, the width of the 2,53 meter, the height of the 2,5 meter and the mass of the order of 10 tons, which is explained by the installation of the base armor providing protection against small fire weapons. In turn, the Kalashnikov Concern has developed a combat automated system BAS-01G BM “Companion”, whose weapon systems can include 12,7-mm and 7,62-mm machine gun, 30-mm grenade launcher AG-17А and new 40-mm automatic grenade launcher. Also, BAS provides for the possibility of installing eight anti-tank Cornet-EM missiles.


The 7-ton BAS “Companion” has lighter weapons than the Uran-9. Its main weapon is the 12,7-mm machine gun

THeMIS from Estonia

In the field of armed robots, it is necessary to note the platform that has been used by numerous companies to develop unmanned armed systems. This platform THeMIS, designed and manufactured by the Estonian company Milrem Robotics. THeMIS (Tracked Hybrid Modular Infantry System) means "hybrid modular tracked infantry system". This open architecture platform, weighing 1450 kg, is equipped with a diesel engine and an electric generator; in hybrid mode, it can operate 8-10 hours, whereas in fully electric mode, the operating time varies from 0,5 to 1,5 hours. In a typical configuration, one of the modules contains batteries and another generator, that is, customers can choose between all-electric and hybrid solutions. Milrem has evaluated various types of batteries and is ready to install fuel cells at the customer's request. THeMIS can reach speeds of 14 km / h and overcome slopes up to 60% and side slopes up to 30%. The device has a length of 2,4 meter, width of 2,15 meter and height of 1,1 meter, the size of the area for the target load between the two side modules is 2,05xXNNUMX meter, it can take 1,03 kg load.


TheMIS of Milrem opens fire from the FN Herstal M12,7R 3 machine gun installed in the deFNder Medium weapon module

When used as a transport system, the cargo platform THeMIS is equipped with a cage height 53 cm with an internal volume 1,12 м3. Milrem devices are complemented by a variety of remote control options and autonomous capabilities. Among them, navigation through intermediate points, zonal navigation used to neutralize improvised explosive devices and search and rescue tasks, “follow the lead”, “driver assistance” and “time” modes. In order to optimize the path of the DMM, intelligent route planning is also available with functions to check the sectors of vision, radio range and terrain type.

Also, more advanced modes are considered for this robot, for example, improved detection and circumvention of obstacles due to learning neural networks in a virtual learning environment, voice and hand commands to reduce operator load in the field and augmented reality to ensure complete operator immersion. turns out to be in the center of the action with all the necessary projected information. “Autonomic capabilities today are not at the level that would allow to solve all possible scenarios that our DUM might encounter, so our autonomous kit is always adapted to the needs of customers,” said Mart Noorma from Milrem Robotics, explaining that it’s difficult to evaluate the current status of various developments, based on the overall level of technological readiness, since a perfect solution for one scenario can be quite useless for another. Milrem Robotics is able to develop solutions for the customer, which include the components of the above capabilities and technologies.

Will robots change ground combat paradigm?

The Estonian company Milrem developed the robot THeMIS - a caterpillar DUM with hybrid propulsion, which has become a reference platform for many Western manufacturers of weapons

The Estonian company provides customers with another useful tool, called DIBS (Digital Infantry Battlefield Solution). “It was developed jointly with military experts to demonstrate the potential of ground mobile robots in combat operations, both as individual platforms and as part of a group, as well as when people and robots work together,” Noorma added. DIBS works as a kind of combat laboratory, which allows you to understand how to deploy DUMs in order to optimally use the fleet of such devices, as well as to work out the fulfillment of the task.

The Estonian company has provided its platform to several partners who have installed their systems on it. Singapore Technologies Engineering signed an agreement in 2016 on using THeMIS as the basis for several possible products and installed its Adder remotely controlled weapon module (DUMV) armed with an 12,7-mm machine gun or an 40-mm automatic grenade launcher. At IDEX 2017, Milrem and IGG Aselsan presented THeMIS, equipped with a SARP DUMA developed by Turkish Aselsan. whereas a month later, an Estonian company announced a collaboration with Kongsberg and QinetiQ North America on installing the Protector module on the DMM, in this case QNA will provide a management system.


The French company Nexter installed its ARX-20 module, equipped with an 20-mm 20М61 cannon, on the THUMIS® DUM. The system under the index ORTIO-X20 was shown at the Eurosatory 2018 exhibition.

Heavy weapons for THeMIS

At Eurosatory 2018, Nexter showed ORTIO-X20, a combination of the THeMIS robot with its remote-controlled armament module ARX-20 with an 20-mm gun. This was the first attempt to install medium-caliber weapons on this DUM. The ARX-20 is armed with an 20М621 cannon for an 20x102 mm projectile and an optional twin 7,62-mm machine gun FN MAG 58. At the same exhibition you could see THeMIS with the FN Herstal deFNder Medium module, armed with an 12,7-mm machine gun M3R. At the exhibition, Milrem Robotics and MBDA announced an agreement on the development of a DUM variant armed with fifth generation MMP anti-tank missiles. They will be installed in the MBDA IMPACT (Integrated MMP Precision Attack Combat Turret) turret, which is equipped with day / night sensors, two missiles ready for launch, and an optional 7,62-mm machine gun.

Since DUM THeMIS is heavy enough, it is well suited for installing weapons. However, it can be adapted for other tasks, its large carrying capacity allows it to be converted into an intelligence or transport system.


At the Eurosatory 2018 exhibition, MBDA announced an agreement with Milrem to install its IMPACT HMAS, armed with fifth generation MMR anti-tank missiles, on the THeMIS robotic platform.

Mission Master from Canada

The Canadian branch of the German company Rheinmetall developed a robotic platform some time ago, which was presented in serial configuration at the Eurosatory exhibition. The phrase “final configuration” is not appropriate here, since a system of this type is evolutionary by definition. The first option, called the Mission Master, in the cargo configuration allows not only to perform the tasks of supply, but also prepared for the tasks of evacuating the wounded and injured.


Presented at the Eurosatory 2018 exhibition in the supply version, the RHM Mission Mission Master of Rheinmetall Canada can now be equipped with various modules, including a COLM

Mission Master is based on the commercial platform Avenger 8x8 developed by the Canadian company Argo. It was originally equipped with a diesel engine, but Rheinmetall Canada replaced it with an electric motor and a set of lithium-ion batteries, which provide approximately 8 hours of continuous operation. To make DUM as autonomous as possible was the first goal of the company and for this most of the “brains” of the system are installed on board; however, remote control is also possible. On the left, behind the Mission Master platform, there is a touch screen that can be removed and controlled at a distance of up to 100 meters. “The front sensor package includes the 3D laser locator and camera, and the rear sensor unit includes the camera and laser locator, the latter two-coordinate,” explained Alain Trembley from Rheinmetall Canada, adding that “two optional side cameras can be installed if the customer wishes overview". In order to increase the viewing distance and improve the recognition quality, a radar station can also be installed on the vehicle.

All these subsystems can be easily installed thanks to the CAN protocol bus, which provides automatic configuration of the connected components. Mission Master Robot with its two satellite receivers and inertial navigation platform is able to use any existing satellite constellation. An inertial navigation system plus a digital map of the work area loaded into the navigation system allows the Mission Master to move around the area for a while in the absence of a satellite signal. Semi-autonomous functions, for example, “follow me”, allow working with several devices.


Rheinmetall Canada worked not only on stand-alone modules, but also on the layout of the device so that its Mission Master maximally meets the soldier’s needs in the field

Rheinmetall Canada not only worked on stand-alone modules, but also tried to adapt the platform to military tasks. “We’ve added along the sides of the container machine 16 containers compatible with NATO ammunition boxes, which can also be used for other purposes. Tubular racks installed along the sides allow you to fold backpacks on them, and when lowered they become seats that can accommodate, for example, sedentary wounded; only stretchers can be installed on the platform, since the device is 2,95 meter in length, ”said Trembley. With a dead weight of less than 800 kg, the platform can take a weight of almost 600 kg, the maximum carrying capacity in amphibious operations is 400 kg.


The on-board DUMM Mission Master touch screen can be removed and used for remote control of the device

In addition to the DUM cargo configuration, the Mission Master can be equipped for other types of tasks; at an exhibition in Paris, for example, the car was shown with a DUMV armed with an 12,7-mm machine gun. The company Rheinmetall Canada, a member of the Rheinmetall group, is engaged in the development and production of a MASM, but thanks to the open architecture of the system any other combat module can be installed. Considering the mass category of the Mission Master, Rheinmetall Canada intends to test it with the 20-mm gun at the start of the 2019 year. Another target load may be installed on the machine, for example, reconnaissance, repeater, reconnaissance, or EW modules. For modules with high power consumption, an auxiliary power unit can be installed; ultimately, it can be used to increase the operating time of the platform. The APU of this type, along with fuel, weighs about 10 percent of the Mission Master's carrying capacity in amphibious operations.


Photos of an early version of Robot's Probot; Israel is one of the leaders in the field of unmanned systems, both ground and air

Probot from Israel and ALMRS from Britain

Limited human resources have always forced Israel to think outside the box, thanks to which this country has been a leader in the use of UAVs for several decades. As for unmanned ground systems, ground robots have been patrolling the borders of Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv for several years. Roboteam has developed an enhanced version of the Probot 2 configuration 4x4 weighing 410 kg, which, after “re-fitting” into tracks, can carry cargo weighing 700 kg. which is much more than its own mass. The hours of 8 hours were increased by adding a generator that recharges batteries while driving, and also extends the monitoring mode to 72 hours - this is the requirement of the SMET program of the US Army, under which Probot passed the first selection. Roboteam DUM can develop 9,6 km / h speed and work on intermediate GPS coordinates or be equipped with a “follow me” kit.

Many European armies are looking at the DMM with interest in order to reduce the risks and the load on the soldiers; most are currently interested in transportation tasks. Here you can call the British program ALMRS (Autonomous Last Mile Resupply System - autonomous supply system on the last mile), in which the calculation is done not only on ground vehicles. The 2017 document, released in June, addresses three main technological areas: unmanned air and land cargo platforms, technologies and systems that allow these cargo platforms to operate autonomously, and finally, self-forecasting, planning, tracking and optimizing the supply of military users. In July, five teams were selected for 2018, marking the beginning of the one-year 2 Phase, in which the Army Warfighting Experiment was conducted in November of the same year.


Safran e-Rider dum during 2017 demonstration in October. The company leads a team that will provide three different prototypes for evaluation.

French and Italian efforts

The French Office of Land Armaments has launched the FURIOUS program (Future systemes Robotiques Innovants en tant qu'OUtilS au profit du combattant embarque et debarque - promising innovative robotic systems for the army). Its goal is to deploy three demo units of different sizes, which will operate as part of infantry squads at the CENZUB urban combat training center in Sisson. Safran Electronics & Defense and Effidence, a logistics robotics company, were tasked with developing these prototypes. In October 2017, Safran showed off the e-Rider, a hybrid diesel-electric vehicle, which was equipped with a generator, which increased the range to 200-300 km. It demonstrated its autonomous capabilities by moving fully autonomously along a pre-planned route, avoiding obstacles and returning to the starting position; the follow me mode was also shown. Safran has integrated the sensors and control system into a Technical Studio 4x4 manned vehicle capable of carrying up to four passengers or one stretcher. Building on this experience, Safran will work with Effidence to develop the three demo samples required.

At the beginning of 2010, the Italian army was ready to deploy an armed robot weighing 100 kg in Afghanistan, its main task was to ensure the security of the military base. The TRP-2 FOB, developed by Oto Melara (currently Leonardo), could reach speeds of 15 km / h, the duration of work was 4 hours, it was armed with an 5,56-mm machine gun FN Minimi and a 40-mm single-shot grenade launcher. Purchased on an urgent request, the system has not been deployed because of the difficulties with its certification. The Italian Arms Directorate is currently completing the certification process, which will alleviate the problems of handling armed SMMs.


The Italian company Ingegneria Dei Sistemi offers the army an easy platform Bulldog, which can be used to solve tactical and logistic tasks

Ingegneria dei Sistemi (IDS) offers the Bulldog robotic platform. The modular DMM presented at the Eurosatory exhibition can be used for different tasks: transporting the wounded, neutralizing IEDs, reconnaissance and surveillance, or fire support. Each wheel rotates a high-power brushless electric motor, which results in excellent vehicle acceleration and a maximum speed of 40 km / h. The Bulldog has a 0,88 meter length, a 0,85 meter width, an 100 kg own weight and a 150 kg carrying capacity. The latter can be significantly increased, since electric motors allow the Bulldog to tow a trailer with 300 kg, that is, the total carrying capacity is sufficient for the tasks of supplying and evacuating the wounded. The system can be quickly reconfigured from wheels to tracks. An antenna is mounted on the tubular frame, ensuring maximum control radius, and if necessary, a backpack can be mounted on the frame. Lithium polymer batteries are installed in two interchangeable drawers, the standard operating time is 12 hours. Bulldog can be controlled by cable, remotely via radio, can work in semi-autonomous mode via voice commands, as well as in automatic mode; A stand-alone module is available to reduce the load on the operator, which allows him to concentrate on the payload. The control interface is a hardened tablet with a 7-inch touchscreen and a joystick. DUM is equipped with two sets of day / night sensors, installed in front and behind. DUM Bulldog is currently being evaluated in an infantry school of the Italian army; IDS also offers it to foreign customers.


Turkish DUM UKAP, developed by Katmerciler, is equipped with Aselsan SARP DUMV; Photos from the DSA show in Kuala Lumpur, held in April 2018

Turkish and Ukrainian achievements

The Turkish company Katmerciler has developed a heavy DUM UKAP with its own tonnage of 1,1 and a tonnage of useful tonnage of 2; An electrically driven machine can reach speeds of 25 km / h, the operating time is one hour from batteries and five hours from an onboard generator. UKAP is offered with a DUM In AARSAN SARP, which can accept an 12,7-mm machine gun or an 40-mm automatic grenade launcher. The DUMV is also equipped with an automatic tracking system that allows you to fire in motion.

Ukraine has chosen a wheeled solution and offers two DUM, Phantom and 2 Phantom. The first one is a hybrid platform 6x6 with a combat weight of one ton and a payload of 350 kg, it is capable of developing a speed of 38 km / h. DUM 3 meter length and 1.6 meter width is offered in different versions: sanitary and rescue, ammunition delivery, reconnaissance and fire support. The armed version is equipped with a DUMM with a 12,7-mm machine gun and four Barrier ATGMs with a range of 5 km. The Phantom was reportedly tested at the end of 2017 of the year, then the certification process began. A further development of this platform was the DUM 2 Phantom 4,2 meter long, 2,1 ton combat weight and 1,2 ton carrying capacity, which allows you to install more powerful heavy weapons.



The Ukrainian DUM Phantom is armed with an 12,7-mm machine gun and four anti-tank missiles. DUM Phantom 2 (photo below) in the configuration 8х8 has a significantly greater load capacity

Many other systems have been developed, the description of which was not included in the article, although photographs of some of them are given, for example:


DUM Little Milosh of the Yugoslavian company Yugoimport weighs about 300 kg and has a load capacity of 400 kg. The range is 2 km, and the duration of 4 hours, the device is armed with a 7,62-mm machine gun and a six-shot 40-mm grenade launcher

American approach

The US Army undoubtedly shows interest in unmanned ground vehicles in order to increase combat effectiveness and reduce risks. In the future, various systems can be assigned to the combat teams of three types, heavy medium and light.

For several years now, the army has been implementing the so-called Wingman Joint Capability Technology Demonstration program (JCTD - a research program for assessing technological capabilities), in which the HMMWV-based control and monitoring machine, equipped with the Long Range Advanced Scout Surveillance System - Advanced long range reconnaissance system). The second robotic machine of the complex, also equipped with a HMMWV base, is equipped with a tripod, on which the Picatinny LRWS module, armed with an M240В machine gun, is installed, as an option, a multi-barreled Gatling MXXUMX machine gun can be installed. The machine is controlled by a set of sensors and electronics Robotic Technology Kernel. In the middle of 134, the US Army decided to expand this program to other platforms, including the M2018 armored personnel carrier with simultaneous installation of a CROWS DUMV armed with an 113-mm machine gun. The ultimate goal is to verify the possibility of certifying the system at the Scout Gunnery Table VI test site, where the crews of combat vehicles are certified.


Robotic Wingman maneuvers in semi-autonomous mode at the Scout Gunnery Table VI test site in Fort Benning

With regard to logistics support, more progress is seen here. The development of the SMET (Squad-Multipurpose Equipment Transport) program for a multipurpose platform for transporting equipment at the squad level is ongoing, but the current goal is to develop a land-based robotic complex capable of performing logistic tasks in order to reduce physical stress on light dismounted forces. The US Army in December 2017 selected four participants for the SMET project: Applied Research Associates (ARA) and Polaris Defense (Team Polaris); General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS); HDT Global; and Howe & Howe Technologies.

The initial combat principles and SMET requirements applied to a vehicle that could accompany soldiers marching at 3 km / h speed up to 72 hours without refueling over a distance of more than 97 km. Ultimately, the device will have to work in three modes: autonomous, semi-autonomous and remote control.

The platform must carry a load of 454 kg and generate 3 kW parked and 1 kW in motion. Transporting an 454 kg will reduce the load on each soldier in the squad by 45 kg. By reducing the load, the platform will allow Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) infantry brigade groups to travel long distances, while generating electricity from this platform will allow equipment and batteries to be charged on the go. The Marine Corps also has similar needs, but it’s unclear whom to choose.

The army also wants to reduce the burden on its supply services, for which Oshkosh Defense issued a contract worth 49 million dollars for the integration of autonomous technologies into its multi-functional transport platforms Palletized Load System. This program, called Expedient Leader Follower, will allow unmanned trucks to become part of transport convoys.

On the materials of the sites:
www.nationaldefensemagazine.org
www.rheinmetall.com
766uptk.ru
kalashnikov.com
milremrobotics.com
www.nexter-group.fr
www.robo-team.com
www.janes.com
www.gov.uk
www.defense.gouv.fr
www.idscorporation.com
www.katmerciler.com.tr
www.army-technology.com
www.oshkosh.com
sputniknews.com
www.defense-aerospace.com
pinterest.com
bastion-karpenko.ru
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 December 2018 07: 35
    The robot must go ahead of man, instead of man.
    But the problem is the remote control of the robot in the conditions of interference, the vulnerability of robots from small arms, the problem of constant all-round visibility. To date, robots are used successfully mainly against militants. For example, American shock drones are ineffective in conditions of interference and the use of modern anti-aircraft weapons.
    More:
    http://www.sinor.ru/~bukren16/BO_ROB13.doc
    1. +1
      10 December 2018 09: 21
      If the robot will go ahead of man, then why then will a man be needed at all? Robots will build themselves, robots will fight, and people will find places in this whirlpool? Question from the field of philosophy.
      Second-hand drones use short-wave encrypted broadband communication, it is almost impossible to drown it at close range.
      The main obstacle to mass use is the price .... and they are raw so far.
      1. +1
        10 December 2018 17: 50
        "The main obstacle to mass adoption is the price ...." ////
        -----
        Not the price. The price is acceptable. The main obstacle is the complete change in the tactics of the ground forces at the level of the company battalion.
        Command hierarchy - to whom are the DUM operators subordinate? Where are they physically located?
        1. +1
          11 December 2018 02: 15
          In my opinion, nothing fundamentally changes. DUM do not have any increased invulnerability. From an impact of a BOPS or a close rupture of the OFS, they will fail similarly to any other technique. Remote control gives only the illusion of security. The outgoing signal can be tracked and hit on the operator. And it is also impossible to let the DUM go far: natural obstacles can interrupt the control signal. Of course, you can "hang" a repeater over the battlefield, but then the enemy will first of all destroy the repeater. The command hierarchy is an important thing, but in my opinion, the logic of application is much more important. And I personally cannot think of a way to use the DUM in a combined arms battle. In the 30s, there were experiments with remotely controlled tanks and they ended as expected: the enemy figured out the control point and destroyed it with artillery fire.
          In my opinion, DUMs are most suitable only as self-propelled platforms (autonomous movement along points, in azimuth, according to GLONASS coordinates, along a laser "tag", with adaptation to the terrain and obstacles) platforms for heavy weapons as part of infantry groups. Remote control of such a machine should be limited only to the issuance of target designation and the command "fire".
          1. +1
            11 December 2018 11: 37
            The most elementary application: reconnaissance in battle, the call of fire on themselves. They will be beaten, of course, but no one will die, and camouflaged firing points will be revealed. Therefore, wedges should be cheap - an Estonian option.
            1. 0
              11 December 2018 12: 37
              Estonian is not an option. :)
              They won't even run over a track from a heavy truck. Deep snow or swamp, deep stream or funnel and the "Estonian version" is lost. Any blockage on the road, a felled tree trunk, even (I suspect) tall grass like reeds. Ours make their vehicles so large for a reason, but also on the basis of a comparable cross-country ability with an infantryman.

              Summon fire on yourself? sw. Warrior Wow, well, they don't sit on that side either, and binoculars are not prohibited there. Nobody will unmask all firing points for the sake of shooting the "Estonian variant". Even the BMP has an overwhelming firepower over it. They will raise the UAV, find out that it is a boom and either hit the control point, or drown out the control channel, or shoot the attackers from mobile fire weapons.

              Intelligence service? Probably. But tell me, what can be scouted with this buzzing midget, which can not be scanned from an UAV?
              1. 0
                11 December 2018 13: 28
                "Nobody will unmask all firing points for the sake of shooting the" Estonian version. "////
                ------
                Have to. The tractor is not blind. With excellent eyesight. And armed. If you let him close, he will shoot the firing points.
                It's exactly like with air drones. Why in Hmeimim all the Shells and Torah are scorched like crazy on cheap drones with mortar mines tied with electrical tape? If you don’t get it, you’ll get a mine on a hat. And no management intercepts, no operator search.
                NO TIME for reflection.
                1. 0
                  11 December 2018 14: 58
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  The tractor is not blind.

                  Well, where is he not blind? blindly blind!
                  just imagine for a second, you’ve got your ears plugged in, dressed in blinkers narrowing your viewing angle to your camera’s viewing angle, you have doused it with painkillers so that you don’t feel hits and can’t determine where you shot ...
                  Will you fight a lot?
                  while these systems are good at demonstration. for example, when the operator knows exactly where the firing point is and rolls out pointing the camera at it. and if the point is not there? viewing angle is so-so. the operator will see where these pieces of iron are from, only if they open fire from the side of the camera.
                  all submitted instances do not have all-round combat control.
                  The Chinese quadrocopter for $ 10 will cope with the reconnaissance tasks you mentioned more effectively. wink
                  IMHO closest to the real application of the British ALMRS. but the story about "self-route planning" on the British training ground looks touching feel British scientists are so British laughing
                  1. +2
                    11 December 2018 15: 13
                    You have very outdated ideas about military IR video cameras. There is also a circular panoramic view with the output of the picture on a single diploma (which the operator sitting in the rear sees). And acoustic instruments. All these devices are many times stronger than the human eye or ear. And the systems have long been tested in a combat situation on conventional MBT and BMP.
                    1. 0
                      11 December 2018 15: 53
                      Quote: voyaka uh
                      There is also a circular panoramic view with the output of the picture on a single diploma (which the operator sitting in the rear sees).

                      of course have! on these specimens not. that's what I'm talking about.
                      no one argues that this is a resolved issue. I say that this issue is not resolved. at the moment, the combat effectiveness of the presented samples is extremely doubtful.
                2. 0
                  12 December 2018 02: 14
                  If we are talking about the same "tractor", then to protect against it, it is enough to dig a trench along the positions. :) It is unlikely that he will overcome it. In my opinion, this machine is generally not suitable for combat. A shell crater or a large piece of a wall in a city will simply block his field of vision and create an insurmountable obstacle. Its height is a meter. No armor. Arm him with a machine gun, he is fine if he can crawl to the positions at all, but after the first shots he will be disassembled into nuts from the machine gun. Even the BMP-2 cannon is overkill for him.
                  It could be used as a kamikaze tank, after all, 750 kg of load (as the developers boast) in TNT equivalent is powerful. Although in the 30-40s in the USSR and Germany, they were engaged in remote-controlled tanks and mines. It is significant that the lightest versions of the Soviet "teletank" based on the T-18 (5 tons) were not accepted precisely because of poor maneuverability and controllability, the tanks got stuck in craters and lost their course after hitting a bump with one caterpillar. The Germans made the "Goliath", it turned out to be ineffective, since the mine was very quickly surrounded and destroyed almost instantly.

                  In Khmeinim, a slightly different story. Barmaley UAVs are surrogate cruise missiles or bombers. For decades, well-developed weapons transferred to the platform of the club of young martyrs. The logic of their use is known, tactics too.
                  And the "tractor" is a thing created for no reason at all. In any case, neither the EU nor NATO were interested in it.
                  1. 0
                    13 December 2018 00: 13
                    The Estonians did not make a fighting vehicle, but a universal chassis platform for fighting vehicles. And everyone was interested in her. Such a small DUM replaces not a tank, but an infantryman.
                    Therefore, it should be low, like an attacking machine gunner.
                    Russian developments are something else. An attempt to create DUM tanks. Hence the armor and large calibers. The design is becoming more expensive and cannot be applied in large quantities.
    2. +1
      10 December 2018 10: 46
      UAVs are not robots. The operator decides to use ammunition. Even the UAV does not evaluate the primitive situation on its own.
  2. 0
    10 December 2018 09: 18
    While this is only the beginning, the development of neural networks and the significant reduction in the cost of batteries in the foreseeable future will give a qualitative breakthrough.
    1. 0
      10 December 2018 17: 58
      You are right, the future lies in electric traction, as it is quieter and functionally rather simplified than ICE with gears and controls. The constant-speed spark of a relatively low-power diesel engine with a generator and a battery in addition is clearly preferable for stand-alone samples ... Only on the samples proposed in the article does it seem that we will soon be back in the new technology, and in quality and universality of application
  3. +1
    10 December 2018 10: 35
    As of December 2018, these are not robots, but remotely controlled devices. With a poor quality power source. The work should theoretically evaluate the operational environment at a primitive level. The current ones - robots - can even observe it in a very limited sector. Uranus-9 was controlled and powered by cable. The operator led the fire only from a place, and not in motion.
  4. -1
    10 December 2018 15: 18
    These are tractors with remote control and without a crew module, that's the right name! This crap has nothing to do with Robots (Abacus with illumination, a shovel with a heated handle and glanas :)) The main task of any weapon is to be under the full control of a person, but what is there? Ordinary machine guns? And how can you control it? They tied a rope to the descent and called it a remote control! :) Any power failure (bad contact, dampness, explosions, etc.) and these things become dangerous to everyone who is around. I'm not even talking about the outrageous service personnel. Starting from the Gamer-button-hunter and ending with the driver-loader (okay, their salaries), so they also need to be protected from enemies, or will they manage from Izhevsk? Expensive -Bogato, but before the "Remotely Controlled Weapon" they are still oh how far. Which is encouraging, maybe we will have time to create something :))!
    1. 0
      10 December 2018 17: 52
      On the one hand, it’s right: this is not a robot, but a DUM.
      On the other hand, this is a very big help to live fighters, like tanks at one time.
  5. +1
    10 December 2018 18: 08
    Uranium-9 from Russia soldier

    THeMIS from Estonia.

    ... THeMIS ambush course ... hi
  6. +2
    10 December 2018 18: 19
    Mission Master from Canada ... Rheinmetall developed a robotic platform some time ago
    Roboteam has developed a reinforced version of Probot 2 4x4 configuration weighing 410 kg
    ALMRS (Autonomous Last Mile Resupply System)
    During the first phase of the Autonomous Replenishment Program at the last Dstl mile, the QinetiQ Titan robot autonomously conducted a mixed terrain route at the Hurn test site in Dorset, UK. The exercises demonstrated the ability of titanium to deliver supplies to troops deployed in dangerous conditions, where access is limited ... hi
  7. 0
    10 December 2018 19: 58
    Will robots change ground combat paradigm?

    At the platoon-company level - YES, the case is settled.

    PS. To the author: too much text.
  8. 0
    10 December 2018 21: 36
    Questions of the "layman".
    1. What is meant by the beautiful phrase "ground combat paradigm"?
    2.What kind of "robots" are we talking about if for now and for a long time "while" we will deal with platforms with AI elements?
    3. Is the military thought moving along the same road in relation to all these robotic systems, trying to replace the fighter on the battlefield? Isn't it time to recognize the existence of two types of "war", where in the first case there is simply a total mowing down of all combat objects without pity and indiscriminately with high-precision and fire-extinguishing means (a clash of highly developed armies) and a confrontation with a weaker enemy, a semi-guerrilla war (Siri, Yemen, Afghanistan ...) where the target will still be living soldiers. Only here there will be a place for something robotic to defend against a less "wealthy" enemy, since under equal conditions the "robots" are being raised, and they will do it with ingenuity.
  9. 0
    10 March 2019 00: 18
    Asimov, I remember, had a story about a robot president ...