Mazepa Oathbreaker, awarded the Order of Judas. Part of 1

35 134 30
In today's Ukraine, Hetman Mazepa is one of the revered national symbols, his portrait is on a banknote, monuments are put to him, and streets and avenues are named after him. The person who has become a symbol of profit, betrayal and treason, cursed by the church, awarded the Order of Judas and despised by his contemporaries, is very close to the rulers of Ukraine, who in their actions follow the example of this idol.

Mazepa Oathbreaker, awarded the Order of Judas. Part of 1




Contemporaries spoke with deepest contempt about Mazepa, rewarding him with the epithet "damned dog Mazepa", not finding a single kind word in his address. And this is not by chance, since all his life he, betraying his comrades-in-arms and benefactors, did not disdain by any means in the struggle for power, honor and wealth. And Mazepa was dying with bitter loneliness, eagerly looking at the barrels and the chest with the stolen gold, in fear that his associates would drag it all away.

Considering history hetmans in Ukraine, of which Mazepa is a prominent representative, it is necessary to take into account the characteristic features of the hetmans of that time. After the Polish gentry were expelled from these lands, on the wave of popular anger, a masterful Cossack foreman came to power, who did not have the knowledge, strength and means to control such a vast territory.

The Cossack officers who did not tolerate any power over themselves nevertheless were forced to seek an alliance with their stronger neighbors - Russia, Turkey and Poland. By concluding alliances, they didn’t really want to comply with them and, betraying the next patron, wanted to live according to their will, without troubling themselves with state construction. A typical representative of his time was hetman Mazepa, whose whole life, due to his character and circumstances, was constantly accompanied by a change of owners.

As a result of the Russo-Polish war of 1654-1667 under the Andrusovo Armistice, the Dnieper hetman split into the Left Bank Hetmanate, which became part of Russia, and the Right Bank Hetmanate, formed in 1663 of the year and focused on Poland and Turkey. In both parts, their hetmans were elected. On the Left Bank, Bogdan Khmelnitsky-Vygovsky - Yury Khmelnitsky-Bryukhovetsky - Many sinners - Samoilovich - Mazepa were elected hetmans. On the Right Bank - Teter, then - Doroshenko and a whole galaxy of leaders who sought to sell their fellow tribesmen to the Polish and Turkish rulers.

How true were the hetmans of the Left Bank to their oath given to the Russian Tsar, can be judged by their unenviable fate. B. Khmelnitsky signed an agreement with Russia, Vyhovsky - betrayed and fled to the Poles who executed him, Yury Khmelnitsky - betrayed and severed the agreement with Russia, went to the Poles, and then to the Turks, Bryukhovetsky - betrayed, killed by the Cossacks for treason, Mnogoshreshny - betrayed, fled to the right bank, extradited and exiled to Siberia, Samoilovich - by denunciation of his entourage accused of treason and exiled to Siberia, Mazepa - betrayed and fled with Charles XII.

By origin, Mazepa was from an Orthodox gentry family on the Right Bank, his ancestors faithfully served the Polish crown. Thanks to his extraordinary intelligence and connections between his father and grandfather, he was at the court of the Polish king from his youthful years. Proximity to the king allowed him to get a brilliant education, he studied in Holland, Italy, Germany and France, fluent in Russian, Polish, Tatar, Latin. He also knew Italian, German and French. I read a lot, had an excellent library in many languages.

Educated and educated in the spirit of Polish culture, Mazepa showed great promise. But after unpleasant intrigues at the royal court, started by Mazepa, he was distant from the courtyard, because of his meanness and baseness, the road to the highest strata of the Polish gentry was forever closed to him.

In 1663, the king sent Mazepa to the Right Bank to present Cossacks with military regalia. Mazepa betrays the Polish king and remains with the right-bank Cossacks, marries the daughter of one of the closest hetman Doroshenko. The father-in-law helps Mazepa advance in the circle of the Cossack sergeant, and he soon becomes the hetman’s confidant and chief clerk, one of the key figures in the hetman’s system.

In 1674, hetman Doroshenko, who betrayed Poland and passed under the protectorate of the Turkish sultan, sent Mazepa with a letter to the sultan, and in confirmation of hetman's loyalty Mazepa carries the captive Cossacks from the Left Bank as a commodity to the slave trade market to the 14 sultan.

The Cossacks intercept the delegation and take Mazepa into captivity, he betrays Doroshenko and agrees to serve their opponents to the left-bank Cossacks who are subordinate to Moscow, he is sent to left-bank hetman Samoylovich, and Mazepa becomes a Russian subject.

Thanks to his talents, the authorities, who are in favor, like Mazepa, are paving the way to Samoylovich’s heart, he even entrusts Mazepa to raise his children and assigns him the title of a military comrade. The Cossack officers recognize him as the Hetman’s “near man”, and after a few years Mazepa receives the rank of General Saul and becomes the second man on the Left Bank.

On the instructions of Samoylovich Mazepa, he regularly visits Moscow, where he receives the favor of Prince Golitsyn, a favorite of Princess Sophia, who in fact had all power in her hands with flattery and humiliation.

Meanness and cynicism in the desire to stipulate and betray his friend, subordinate or benefactor, fully manifested in Mazepa during the unsuccessful Crimean campaigns of 1687 and 1689, organized by Prince Golitsyn.

Due to slander by Mazepa, hetman Samoilovich was convicted of the failure of the first Crimean campaign by the efforts of Prince Golitsyn, he was accused of treason and sent to Siberia, and his son, who was brought up by Mazepa, was beheaded. Hetman Mazepa appropriated half of the confiscated property.

After the fall of Samoilovich Golitsyn, who took a bribe from Mazepa and respectfully related to his education, which he was different and shone, had a decisive influence on the election of Mazepa in 1687, hetman of the Left Bank. There is a petition to Peter I, in which Mazepa writes that he was forced to give a bribe to Golitsyn for the hetman's post in the amount of 11 thousands of chervonets "partly from the belongings of aloof hetman Samoylovich, and partly from his own little name." Cossack officers elected Mazepa as hetman he rewarded by distributing estates, colonel and other posts.

Shortly after the fall of the princess Sophia and the transfer of power to Peter I, Mazepa wrote a denunciation to the tsar on Golitsyn, whom he accused of failing the second Crimean campaign, in which Mazepa himself took part, being already a hetman of the Left Bank. As a result, Golitsyn was deprived of all the regalia and exiled to the Arkhangelsk region.

The historian Kostomarov very clearly characterized Mazepa’s moral career:
“The moral rule of Ivan Stepanovich was rooted from his youth, noticing the decline of the force on which he had previously relied, was not hampered by any sensations and promptings, so as not to contribute to the harm of the previously falling benevolent force for him. Treason to their benefactors more than once already showed in his life. So he changed Poland, having passed to her enemy Doroshenko; so he left Doroshenka as soon as he saw that his power was fluctuating; so, and more shamelessly, he acted with Samoilovich, who warmed him and raised him to the height of the officers' rank. He did the same now with his greatest benefactor, before whom he had recently been flattered and humiliated. ”


A cunning politician and diplomat, a clever flatterer and a courtier, Mazepa skillfully won his sympathies and established the necessary connections. “No one could better, than Mazepa, enchant the right person and bring him to his side,” his closest associate, the falseman Orlik, wrote about Mazepa.

So Mazepa gained complete trust and Peter I, seeking unlimited power on the Left Bank for unhindered personal enrichment. To satisfy his unceasing greed, Mazepa used everything from embezzlement, extortion and bribery to the forced “purchase” of land from peasants, Cossacks and his companions, often accompanied by the use of military force.

On the willfulness of Mazepa, the general judge Kochubey wrote in one of his letters to Peter I: “The hetman arbitrarily controls the military treasury, takes as much as he wants and gives to whom he wants.” In total, during his reign, Mazepa managed to make fabulous capitals, assign and receive from the tsar for faithful service the lands where about 100 thousands of Little Russians and 20 thousands of Russian peasants lived, Mazepa became one of the richest landowners in Russia. (With his thirst for power and greed, today's president of Ukraine Poroshenko is very reminiscent of Mazepa. He has someone to take an example.)

There were legends about the incalculable wealth of Mazepa. Partially they are confirmed by contemporaries. In the memoirs of Gustav Zoldan, approached by Charles XII, he describes how he went into the room to the dying Mazepa, and he asked him “to watch his things carefully ... namely, the chest and two barrels full of ducat, and a pair of travel bags, which were all his jewels and a large number of gold medals. "

All these riches with incredible cruelty were knocked out by the hetman’s administration from the population of the Left Bank and its unfortunate comrades, on whose property and land Mazepa laid eyes. Unable to withstand oppression, bullying and countless extortion, the peasants in large numbers fled not only to Russia, to Zaporizhia or to the Don, but also to the Right Bank, which was under Polish rule. Death threatened and those who hid the fugitives and helped them escape from the excesses of Mazepa.

Ukrainian adherents of Mazepa are trying to present him as a pious and pious man, for his charity in the construction of temples and monasteries. In reality, these are only external manifestations of piety, for which he used not personal, but stolen funds.

The ending should ...
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    6 December 2018 05: 42
    The second order of Judah would be Gorbachev M.S. to give, so in 2011 he was awarded the Order of St. Andrew, the highest award of the Russian Federation !!!! Solzhenitsyn was also awarded the First-Called, dear mother.
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 07: 35
      The order of Andrew the First-Called in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE was awarded to ALL great princes at birth. A blue ribbon was attached. The Grand Duchesses were awarded another order, with a red ribbon. And so the order that in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE that in modern RUSSIA is sometimes issued on * occasion *, without merit.
      In the Soviet Union, there was a tradition of tying a bundle with a girl with a red ribbon, a bundle with a boy in blue.
      1. +4
        6 December 2018 12: 09
        Quote: Yuri Apukhtin
        By origin, Mazepa was from an Orthodox gentry family on the Right Bank, his ancestors faithfully served the Polish crown. Thanks to the extraordinary intelligence and connections of his father and grandfather, he was at the court of the Polish king from his youth. Proximity to the king allowed him to receive brilliant education
        Is this true?
        "History of the Russians" - a dubious source, but, as the heroine of Gaidai's film said: "he can't always lie" - writes: " Hetman Nalivaiko and with him Lebed, Mazepu and Kizima in the square and, announcing to them that they are the keepers of the faith of Christ, they planted alive in a copper bull and burned the bull of that small fire for several hours, until the cries and groans of the martyrs were heard, and eventually the bodies of those tortured in that bull were burned to ashes. Such cruel and inhuman barbarism was invented by the Roman clergy according to the rules and practices of their holy inquisition, and it was done in such a shameful way by the Polish nobles. "Mazepa, who was a Judas, was educated, first of all, JESUIT... And he held his hetman's power over the Cossacks and the rest of the people with regiments of Serdyuk-Poles (Jesuits by education). An example from modern history: your grandfather / great-grandfather was burned in a Nazi concentration camp, and you were educated according to Western programs and walk around with a swastika, and yell "Ukraine is a mustache." In my opinion, a typical picture. Therefore, Mazepa is now a hero there.
      2. 0
        6 December 2018 18: 59
        Not a red - pink ribbon!
  2. +3
    6 December 2018 06: 30
    Fine A.S. Pushkin spoke about Mazepa. Thank you Yuri for the article. Very informative for all readers.
    Today, the division of the Russian Orthodox Church of Russia and Ukraine is gaining momentum. But couldn't it be seen in the actions of the marked man and the drunkard that this would happen? I think that if the Orthodox Church had anathematized them at that time, the people of the USSR and Russia would not have allowed them to come to power. It is not too late to anathematize these traitors now. After all, they have millions of victims of our people on their hands.
    1. 0
      6 December 2018 11: 49
      An anathema can only be proclaimed to members of the Church. Neither Hitler, nor Napoleon nor any other villain can be anathematized - they did not belong to the Russian Orthodox Church as well as the communist Gorbachev.
  3. +5
    6 December 2018 07: 09
    General Vlasov of the 18 century, if such analogies are possible
    Partially Mazepa received during his lifetime, and Anathema lay and will lie on it tightly
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 09: 53
      Quote: Adjutant
      Anathema lay and will lie on it firmly

      well, anathema with him the patriarch of constantinople am already removed - he himself imagined the Pope of Constantinople, the head of the whole Orthodox world! I just forgot that God is above him too!
      1. +4
        6 December 2018 10: 12
        the anathema from him the Patriarch of Constantinople has already removed

        Think I don’t know?)
        because he said exactly what is higher.
        The anathema was removed by the Patriarch of Constantinople, and imposed by the Moscow. Therefore, until Moscow takes it off (which it never will be), it will lie on it, that is, forever.
        And let Constantinople rule in Constantinople
    2. +1
      7 December 2018 14: 22
      Quote: Adjutant
      General Vlasov of the 18 century, if such analogies are possible

      By the way, yes, a very accurate analogue, literally one-on-one, first a faithful companion of Peter I, and then a traitor.
  4. +3
    6 December 2018 07: 29
    This "eroya" of Ukraine was literally devoured by lice.
  5. +3
    6 December 2018 09: 28
    Khreshchatyk in Kiev should be renamed into the avenue of "the cursed dog of Mazepa" (for a long memory and for edification)
  6. +2
    6 December 2018 09: 50
    With his thirst for power and greed, today's president of Ukraine Poroshenko is very reminiscent of Mazepa. He has someone to take an example from.

    I would rather compare Poroshenko with Petro Doroshenko, who in 1669 put Ukraine under the sultan and became the "bey of the vilayet Ukraine". Moreover, both the namesake and the surname are only one letter difference. Reincarnation? Since "Pan Ataman has no gold reserves", he paid tribute to the Turks by girls (to harems) and boys (to janissaries).
    A small detail: Doroshenko decided to lie under the Sultan at the instigation of the then Kiev Metropolitan Joseph of Tukalsky, who advocated submission to the Ukrainian Church to the Patriarchate of Constantinople. In 2007, a monument was erected in Chigirin through the efforts of the false Patriarch Filaret Tukalsky.
    And one more detail: Doroshenko also had his own "Donbass" in the person of the Zaporozhye Sich, which categorically refused to lie under the Turks, having written that very famous "letter to the Turkish Sultan".
    History repeats itself (and the period 1657-87 entered the history of Ukraine as "Ruin")
  7. +2
    6 December 2018 09: 58
    "But after the unpleasant intrigues at the royal court, started by Mazepa, he was removed from the court, because of his meanness and baseness, the road to the upper layers of the Polish gentry was forever closed to him."
    It is unnecessary. Even in relation to such historical personalities as Mazepa, one should not "add demonization". Mazepa did not lead any intrigues, except for the instruction of the horns, at the court and could not lead. For a quarrel on this basis, he lost his place at court.
    He was not also the general secretary at Doroshenko.
  8. +2
    6 December 2018 10: 14
    Leaving the author to the right to his own point of view, I would like, nevertheless, from articles of some objectivity, so that I could form my own opinion.
    Still, we are not here at the rally, where the speaker’s main goal is to entice the crowd, here and now to convince her that he is right, for which some exaggerations, distortions and silences are considered acceptable.
    The information presented by the author does not inspire confidence in me, because it does not have the character of objective research, but rather resembles a certain pamphlet, more suitable for political struggle, where all means are good than for educational purposes.
    1. +1
      6 December 2018 10: 35
      What are educational goals? There are almost no articles left with such goals in the section. Which of today's articles can be called educational? And to write an educational article about Mazep ...
      I cannot imagine such in the present conditions.
      1. +1
        6 December 2018 11: 14
        Quote: Decimam
        Which of today's articles can be called educational?

        I think the article about Danzas can to some extent be considered enlightening, although it is also not devoid of a certain bias.
        Quote: Decimam
        I cannot imagine such in the present conditions.

        From what? If you state the same facts that are in the article, add what was not included in it, because it did not fit into the author’s concept, reduce the number of personal assessments by the author of your character to a minimum, remove parallels with modernity (if they exist, the reader will be able to their own), then it could come out quite badly.
        And so the article turned out, in general, stupid person who, however, considers his readers to be fools and trying to manipulate their opinion.
        1. +2
          6 December 2018 12: 34
          I hope that the flying minuses will allow you to correctly assess the prospects of education at the present time.
  9. -1
    6 December 2018 11: 13
    thanks to the author for an interesting article about the "hero" of modern Ukraine
  10. +5
    6 December 2018 14: 09
    The article does not cause any trust because of roofing felts distorting veils, roofing felts because of their banal ignorance. For example
    As a result of the Russo-Polish war of 1654-1667 under the Andrusovo Armistice, the Dnieper hetman split into the Left Bank Hetmanate, which became part of Russia, and the Right Bank Hetmanate, formed in 1663 of the year and focused on Poland and Turkey. In both parts, their hetmans were elected. On the Left Bank, Bogdan Khmelnitsky-Vygovsky - Yury Khmelnitsky-Bryukhovetsky - Many sinners - Samoilovich - Mazepa were elected hetmans. On the Right Bank - Teter, then - Doroshenko and a whole galaxy of leaders who sought to sell their fellow tribesmen to the Polish and Turkish rulers.

    History Ruins are somewhat more complicated than described. But why is there - the order of events is upset, and much. Starting with the fact that Bogdan Khmelnitsky was the hetman of the Zaporizhzhya Army, but could not be the hetman of the Left Bank, because a split among the Cossacks occurred after his death (which gave rise to the Ruin), and in his time no one divided the Army, and even the Russian-Polish the war is not over. And two separate hetmanism were formed not as a result of the Russian-Polish war, but during it, as a result of the same split among the Cossacks - someone went for the king, someone against him and his methods, and figures like Hops, who he could keep in check the foreman (really masterful and very peculiar), he was no longer among the Cossacks, so two groups each of his hetman were elected. Actually, the borders under the Andrus Treaty and the division into two Zaporizhzhya Troops turned out to be the result of that Ruin, had it not been - Russia would have received ALL the Troops within the borders of the Chernihiv, Kiev and Bratslav Voivodships of the Commonwealth, i.e. Left Bank and Right Bank immediately. And this is just one example, ahem, of the peculiar interpretation of history by the author, or rather, of turning it over to suit his interests.

    In addition, the article does not smell of objectivity, since the author is a pronounced adherent of the black and white world.
    Ukrainian adherents of Mazepa are trying to present him as a pious and pious man, for his charity in the construction of temples and monasteries. In reality, these are only external manifestations of piety, for which he used not personal, but stolen funds.

    One does not interfere. Yes, Mazepa is a traitor, a very cynical and unprincipled shot that has heaped up a lot of things. Yes, Mazepa was a major philanthropist of his time, who spent large sums on the development of education and the construction of churches in the Zaporozhye Army. Both are integral parts of his personality. As they say in the TV series "Hell on Wheels" - "I am a murderer, and I am a railway worker, one can no longer exist without the other." And therefore it must be assessed across the entire range of activities, and not discarding light shades and exaggerating dark ones. I also have a negative attitude towards Mazepa, if anything, but I also cannot deny his positive deeds. A very controversial character in the story. Like most others, by the way. Although to whom I say this - the author of the article Alukhtin, if I saw it right away, I would not write a comment - not in the horse feed.
    1. +4
      6 December 2018 14: 25
      Thank you, colleague, for a good comment. It’s very good that you didn’t see the author’s name right away. smile hi
      1. +5
        6 December 2018 14: 31
        In general, I rarely comment on articles on topvar on the topic of Ukraine, for ... Yes, you understand request But here the hetman of the Left Bank, Bogdan Khmelnitsky, cut too much in the eyes and could no longer restrain himself. In the near future I will be corrected, and I will definitely not comment on new articles laughing For, as already mentioned above - not feed the horse, although I have something to say on this subject, and a lot ....
        1. +2
          6 December 2018 16: 49
          Quote: arturpraetor
          In the near future I will correct, and I will definitely not comment on new articles.

          And you better do not comment, and write your own. smile Look at the turbulence of the masses, raise the site attendance ... smile You just need to write so that the article gets into the "History" section, and not "Opinions". For example, about the same Bogdan Khmelnitsky, but even about Mazepa. An alternative view of an adequate Ukrainian. good
          1. +3
            6 December 2018 17: 01
            Quote: Trilobite Master
            And you better do not comment, and write your own.

            Dear colleague, I repeat once again - not a horse feed. I don’t like different srachas, and an attempt to take a detached view of all those events will cause a srach with a probability of 98 percent, or even two, my views on this subject across my throat, ahem, ardent patriots from both sides, have already passed this in fact more than once laughing And the feeling that when the wolf rushes at you at once two main sides, ahem, conflict, drives me into the abyss of despondency, which negatively affects my whole activity request Already there is experience of such attempts, so if I write articles on these topics (and certain ideas and material are already available), then somewhere else.
            1. +2
              6 December 2018 19: 21
              Quote: arturpraetor
              an attempt to look from the outside at all those events will cause a srach with a probability of 98 percent,

              Yes on all 100, do not go to seven fortunetellers. smile Sadly not this, but the fact that
              Quote: arturpraetor
              drives me into the abyss of gloom

              When you write something, counting on positive reviews, and you get tons of negatives, yes, it's a shame. And when you write, relying solely on tons of negativity, but you also get positive feedback, albeit a bit, it's nice.
              You see, not everyone, including those on this site, is such Ukrainophobes. Most people are naturally adequate. It is simply that many do not have enough information, an alternative view, they suspect that there may be "other truth", but vaguely and unclearly, and satisfy their need for information with what is available. And having familiarized themselves with another truth, many of them, in any case, will think, some may even slightly move in their opinion regarding some issue. But I am sure that there is another category who do not suspect, but know that there is "another truth". They read what the author of the article in question writes, for example, frown and close the page. And they are waiting for when something objective will come out that can really satisfy their information hunger without the risk of being poisoned by another pseudo-patriotic Ukrainian-phobic abomination. To such people, I include myself, for example, and I’m hardly so unique. What pulled me today to read Apukhtin, and even more so to leave a comment, I do not know.
              Maybe I am wrong, and, in fact, the struggle for the possibility of Russian Russians understanding and vice versa has long been lost. It would be extremely sad. But it only seems to me that this struggle is just beginning.
              I do not know Ukraine well. Like any Russian, I have relatives there, but they are very distant, and they live in Transcarpathia, but in my opinion it is not exactly Ukraine. That part of history, which is now called the history of Ukraine, interested me and interests only within the Early and High Middle Ages, when it was still the history of Russia. Therefore, I cannot write on the subject of Ukraine proper or its history, I simply cannot master it, because it must be done qualitatively. You probably can, only you don't want to. Sadly sad
              1. +3
                6 December 2018 21: 13
                Quote: Trilobite Master
                You probably can, but you don’t want to.

                Oh, thank you, of course, for such a high praise, dear colleague, but you did not quite understand me.

                I wrote, am writing and will write about Ukraine on one scale or another, as this topic is always interesting to me. Moreover, my passion for alternative history also quite often connects me with the history of Ukraine to one degree or another. The problem is that I do not consider Topvar to be a place where I can post something normal on the topic of Ukraine, as I am too familiar with the discussion of Ukrainian topics on this resource and I can roughly imagine the ratio of those who can with interest take an alternative opinion, and those who criticize Russia and not strictly negative assessment of the history of Ukraine will cause aggression. I have come across a similar situation more than once, and have witnessed similar problems in other, quite normal and adequate Ukrainians on resources with a predominant audience with black and white or extremely patriotic (let's call it that) thinking. There is a very large audience on Topvar, and the majority, alas, does not accept any positive assessments of Ukraine and its history, which fits perfectly with the current political realities and trends of society. Of course, there are colleagues capable of critical thinking in any address for whom you can write and publish something, but .... I honestly doubt that there will be a majority of them.

                And here my elementary defensive reaction works, namely the desire to avoid screaming in the comments accusing me of being a Nazi, fascist, dill, Russophobe, etc., although colleagues who have known me for more than a year (mostly according to my AI activity) they know that I not only never allowed myself derogatory and derogatory remarks about Russia, but I respect and love her story a little less than the history of Ukraine (and sometimes more, due to natural reasons - the fleet, for example , Russia has always been denser laughing ) Any such frauds, a lot of insults and verbal accusations of me, a person who is quite receptive, no matter how I struggle with it, are unsettled for a long time, because of which, one article written and published on topvar on the topic of Ukraine can mean a month of stagnation and a dozen -other unwritten and unpublished articles on the same and other topics. Therefore, I prefer to publish in less .... crowded places where there is great confidence in the adequacy of the majority of the public. And as I said - there are ideas (a closer look at the emergence of the Cossacks in Ukraine, because the picture is quite interesting there, if you look in the complex), there are materials (for example, about the PPR and how Russia could correctly implement the Ukrainian map historically, outside depending on the presence / absence of some local autonomy or statehood), and I will definitely be published - but not here, because I don’t feed the horse. Most of the local public prefer Alukhtin and throwing stones and feces on their neighbors in the strange and even perverted hope that this will help them regain the sympathy of the second largest people from among the Eastern Slavs.
                1. +2
                  6 December 2018 23: 03
                  Thanks for the clarifications.
                  I understand your position, although I cannot completely separate it. However, with my advice, suggestions and regrets I will not climb anymore. smile
                  I sincerely wish you creative success and more adequate readers. I am pleased to communicate with you on occasion.
                  smile hi
  11. 0
    6 December 2018 18: 54
    A great ideal for Absurdistan! It is such a Judas, a Christ-seller, eaten alive by lice and good for a couple to the second "hero" bloody dwarf Bandera. Parsley knows his heroes!
  12. +1
    7 December 2018 23: 04
    no, of course, I understand that Apukhin does not like the "regime" and all its attributes ...
    but so juggle with historical facts ??
    Although, maybe it is necessary to write categorically, serve the facts, unconfirmed data in a priori confirmed .. personal opinion for contemporaries.
    I don't even know what to refute - after all, you have to write a whole article without being a fan of Mazepa, because the figure is very significant and in Russia the official position of Tsar Peter I in relation to Mazepa was accepted. And although subsequently - the figure of the Tsar himself was questioned, his actions and his significance (and strongly) were somewhat dispelled. At the same time, they returned honor to one (Godunov) and overthrew Peter a little.
    Shortly after the fall of the princess Sophia and the transfer of power to Peter I, Mazepa wrote a denunciation to the tsar on Golitsyn, whom he accused of failing the second Crimean campaign, in which Mazepa himself took part, being already a hetman of the Left Bank. As a result, Golitsyn was deprived of all the regalia and exiled to the Arkhangelsk region.

    What is it like? We all know that Vasily (I hope that the author is aware that his brother Boris actively promoted Peter and saved his brother from death), a protege of Sofya Alekseevna, and could not count on mercy (but her brother and high family) when the ruler was deposed *? And Russia himself owes a great deal to Vasily himself!
    Under the agreement, and more precisely, under the terms of the “Eternal Peace”, Smolensk, Kiev and Left-Bank Ukraine became part of Russia

    and not only that (there are also reforms, including financial and military ones)
    That is, Peter asserted his authority and everyone who was with Sophia gradually dealt with (especially unlucky Tsykler). And the lover of the ruler and the chief governor certainly didn’t shine ... But after all, Mazep needs to be blamed as well! He did not write denunciations to Lev Kirillovich for an hour? And on Ivan Brovkin?
    A man who has become a symbol of profit, betrayal and betrayal, cursed by the church, awarded the Order of Judah and despised by his contemporaries, is very close to the rulers of Ukraine, who take an example from this idol in their actions.

    All people are made with various symbols - the people themselves. For example, such articles! Some people-orders, some-executions, some-awards, etc.
    I especially liked that the church! Only Russian. It could not be otherwise (Peter 1 ... reform of the Church Synod) in Russia the church is always an instrument of power.
    Despite the imposition of a noncanonical anathema by the Russian Church on the hetman Mazepa, representatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate did not recognize it.

    He was buried by the way according to the Orthodox rite and buried. The decisions of the Russian Orthodox Church do not have power over the world of Orthodoxy. Moreover, those adopted under pressure from politicians (the tsar)
    I don’t understand how it is possible for worldly betrayal (he did not betray faith, but a monarch) can anathema a person who
    at his own expense Ivan Mazepa built 26 cathedrals, churches and bell towers, including outside Ukraine

    All Saints Church on the Economic Gate of the Pechersky Monastery, Nicholas Military Cathedral, Epiphany Cathedral in the Bratsk Monastery, etc. - where would they come from?
    Churches in the Moscow state (Rylsk, Ivanovo) also he ...
    The author forgot about
    The most significant gift from the Hetman Mazepa of the Ukrainian church was the Peresopnytsia Gospel, at which the Presidents of Ukraine are currently taking the oath.

    Ivan Mazepa presented a silver altar board and a precious gospel to the Church of the Resurrection of Christ (Jerusalem)
    Mazepa's gifts to churches are in the Orthodox churches of Syria, Palestine, Istanbul and Mount Athos ...
    books “The Crown of Christ” “Canon of the Most Holy Theotokos Osmoglasny” (1697), “Psalter” (1697) and “Oktoih” (1699). In these books they write about Mazepa as “a hefty clerk and benefactor of the monastery of Pechersk Kievsky”
    and his ROC anathema for Peter’s betrayal ... well, yes, Peter didn’t forgive anyone. He’s generally known.
    And to be honest, I put the deeds of Peter for the church (Orthodoxy, not only the Russian Orthodox Church) and Mazepa .. the latter did much more for the church. But he was anathematized ...
    I don’t care that he was anathematized. There are enough traitors to the monarchs. In Russia, they like to remember Mazepa and keep silent about Kurbsky ... but all the dogs are hung on a Ukrainian. Even ecclesiastical, although this was the usual betrayal of the monarch (oath? Oath. Crossed? Crossed? So he betrayed the one to whom he swore, he did not change faith)
    In general, let’s dwell on the fact that we judge a person who left both a good mark (education, church, art, architecture, etc.) and a bad one (he ran away, changed his oath, set up the Cossacks) ...
    it is impossible for the scales to be overshadowed only by a bad trace. We study history, not the emotions of Peter. We must be balanced with historical figures. We will not leave such a mark as they do. (Too many "we" but I want balanced reflections, not emotions)
  13. +1
    8 December 2018 00: 58
    Quote: Vasily50
    The order of Andrew the First-Called in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE was awarded to ALL great princes at birth. A blue ribbon was attached. The Grand Duchesses were awarded another order, with a red ribbon. And so the order that in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE that in modern RUSSIA is sometimes issued on * occasion *, without merit.
    In the Soviet Union, there was a tradition of tying a bundle with a girl with a red ribbon, a bundle with a boy in blue.

    In the garden elder ... lol