Military Review

The expert called the weapon, "saving the world"

47
Russian Sarmat missiles and Poseidon torpedoes are capable of destroying the United States, making the nuclear war meaningless and saving the American people from death, writes Doctor of Military Sciences Konstantin Sivkov in his article for publication MIC.




According to Sivkov, in reality, wars are not prevented by good wishes and arguments about how to live well without weapons, and the creation of "such a counterweight, which will stop the aggressor at the design stage."

By threatening to destroy the American elite, Russia is preventing a nuclear war, thereby saving the people of the United States from monstrous sacrifices,
he writes.

According to the expert, the false pacifists managed to achieve a large-scale reduction of nuclear arsenals, as a result, the third world regained sense: you can try to win if the stakes are particularly high. It is for such a war that the US is preparing, creating a global missile defense system, abandoning the INF Treaty, unleashing a strategic arms race. Therefore, in the present conditions, Russia must again make a nuclear war senseless.

This can be achieved by creating systems that are guaranteed to destroy the applicant for victory - the United States. It is about the destruction, and not about causing "unacceptable damage", which may vary, according to the material.

With the creation of the Sarmat rocket and the Poseidon torpedoes, the Russian leadership is receiving just such a weapon. And this is a true pacifist approach. Such a weapon, by the way, saves the lives of the peoples of all countries, who could become the theater of a new war,
concludes the author.

Recall, the State Department recently announced an ultimatum to Moscow, according to which Moscow must return to the implementation of the INF Treaty during the 2 months, otherwise Washington will suspend the fulfillment of its obligations under the document.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
47 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. BAI
    BAI 5 December 2018 09: 02
    +14
    the creation of "such a counterweight that will stop the aggressor at the design stage."

    The only way. Even thoughts of an attack should not arise.
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 5 December 2018 09: 05
      +2
      The military lobby in the states is now on horseback and they are actively working (and not unsuccessfully) in waging wars, maintaining instability, etc., and this alignment, alas, for a long time. The main thing for us is to do our job and not get involved in this race.
      1. cniza
        cniza 5 December 2018 09: 35
        +5
        They do not have enough brains to understand that there is a limit to everything and the quantity of weapons already exceeds the ability to control it.
        1. maxim947
          maxim947 5 December 2018 10: 16
          +3
          There, brains work only with an eye on money, and they do not care about this excessive amount of weapons or not. The Yankees will not attack a country capable of giving a serious rebuff, they will stifle it with sanctions, organize revolutions, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to have the very necessary amount of armaments, support it and develop it, and engage more in your economy.
          1. dorz
            dorz 5 December 2018 10: 47
            -1
            Quote: maxim947
            Therefore, it is necessary to have the very necessary amount of armaments, support it and develop it, and engage more in your economy.

            The production and sale of weapons is their economy. Americans annually sell weapons and $ 175 billion military systems per year, NATO’s total budget is approaching $ 1 trillion. and occupy 55% of world defense spending. 8 companies from the TOP 10 in terms of profit and turnover in the arms market are American.
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 5 December 2018 15: 53
              +1
              Quote: maxim947
              There, brains work only with an eye on money, and they do not care about this excessive amount of weapons or not.

              There, brains work not only with an eye on money, but if they have their own anti-nuclear bunkers in which they can comfortably shelter from the consequences of a global nuclear military catastrophe for several years.
            2. Sarmat Sanych
              Sarmat Sanych 5 December 2018 17: 38
              +3
              The real annual sales of weapons by P. Indosia abroad - about $ 50 billion, 175 - you most likely calculated the total annual revenue of the American olfactory companies, including the Pentagon’s internal purchases and free military assistance from the States to the allies.
              1. dorz
                dorz 5 December 2018 17: 42
                0
                Yes, this is the domestic and foreign market, civilian weapons and miscellaneous dual-use equipment.
          2. Alexander Bushkovsky
            Alexander Bushkovsky 6 December 2018 06: 48
            +1
            To develop your economy, for this you need, firstly, to have the political will to expel from the government all this liberal stratum oriented towards Western "values" (5th column), but Putin does not have it, since his entourage is practically this is the 5th column. It seems to me that after Putin leaves the government, and the Kremlin will start such a fight for power who will be the first to start selling to Russia at retail and wholesale.
    2. Qwertyarion
      Qwertyarion 5 December 2018 09: 11
      +8
      Their thoughts about the attack will arise as long as Russia exists, we will not console ourselves with illusions. Too large, resource-rich and sparsely populated (relative to the territory) country.
      1. cniza
        cniza 5 December 2018 09: 34
        +3
        Therefore, "salivation", looking at us, will not stop soon.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 5 December 2018 09: 56
      +5
      All countries possessing nuclear weapons must enter the INF Treaty. Otherwise, there is no point. For it can fly from where it was not expected.winked
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 5 December 2018 20: 07
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        All countries possessing nuclear weapons must enter the INF Treaty. Otherwise, there is no point. For it can fly from where it was not expected.

        Thought right. good
        But Trump-ling wants to put only the PRC apart from us at the negotiating table, because China, with its RMSD, blocked their AMG all approaches, having organized the AD / 2D zone and taking aim at their base in the APR. And what about the satellites of the type of England, France - he does not see it point-blank, because they play ha on his side (NATO). Also, the States do not see Israel’s nuclear weapons, but they howl like a dog on the moon about the Persians' nuclear program.
        They are sly-ass card cheaters in mn politics. It is hard to call them chess players, and even more so "grandmasters" ...
        And if the treaty on the INF Treaty also concluded a Treaty on the prohibition of placing nuclear weapons outside the national territory, then it would be generally wonderful! Closer Alaska on land, they would not have got to us. And with plarb and SAK could be overcome ... angry
        Somehow, however.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 5 December 2018 09: 04
    +2
    With the creation of the Sarmat rocket and the Poseidon torpedoes, the Russian leadership is receiving just such a weapon. And this is a true pacifist approach. Such a weapon, by the way, saves the lives of the peoples of all countries, who could become the theater of a new war,

    This is true only until the moment when the nuclear button of the United States or England does not have a madman who considers that a nuclear conflict is not destructive as much as is commonly believed.
    1. Qwertyarion
      Qwertyarion 5 December 2018 09: 43
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      This is true only until the moment when the nuclear button of the United States or England does not have a madman who considers that a nuclear conflict is not destructive as much as is commonly believed.

      Such a "mutant" will surely appear, it's only a matter of time.
      1. sergo1914
        sergo1914 5 December 2018 10: 53
        +2
        Quote: Qwertyarion
        Quote: NEXUS
        This is true only until the moment when the nuclear button of the United States or England does not have a madman who considers that a nuclear conflict is not destructive as much as is commonly believed.

        Such a "mutant" will surely appear, it's only a matter of time.


        One "mutant" cannot start a nuclear war. Several "mutants" should sit at different points and carry out a certain sequence of actions. The likelihood of such an event is vanishingly small. And they and we.
        1. Qwertyarion
          Qwertyarion 5 December 2018 11: 16
          0
          Quote: sergo1914
          One "mutant" cannot start a nuclear war. Several "mutants" should sit at different points and carry out a certain sequence of actions. The likelihood of such an event is vanishingly small. And they and we.

          Let's take a look at the example of Hitler! After all, at first it was not "mutants" who surrounded him, but into what madness then everything plunged.
          In the same way, a possible future "mutant" having come to power, will gradually surround himself with similar types and for some time will make "mutants" of them, they will crawl to control the "nuclear button" and take a collective insane decision to use nuclear weapons.
          Is such a course of events possible?
          1. You Vlad
            You Vlad 5 December 2018 11: 25
            0
            Quote: Qwertyarion
            Let's take a look at the example of Hitler! After all, at first it was not "mutants" who surrounded him, but into what madness then everything plunged.

            Madness for us, and for them it was all more than profitably!
            1. Qwertyarion
              Qwertyarion 5 December 2018 11: 35
              +1
              This is an example of the assassination of insane killing madmen with claims to exclusivity.
              There is no guarantee that this will not happen again.
    2. avebersek
      avebersek 5 December 2018 22: 51
      0
      England does not have such opportunities. The USA has, but Our president said who ...
      You have no options, so get mad.
  3. Svarog
    Svarog 5 December 2018 09: 04
    +3
    America will not fight with us .. Everyone wants to live. Their plan is already obvious, this is the weakening of Russia, through the creation of many cross-border conflicts, plus sanctions, even the actions of the liberal government, everything in the compartment should weaken us, after which our brothers will move us, possibly with the Poles and the Baltic states ..
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 5 December 2018 09: 14
      +6
      Quote: Svarog
      America will not fight with us ..

      Mattresses are traders. They became rich during the First World War, and became even richer from the Second World War.
      The US defense industry has long been a means of enriching some financial circles. At the same time, they are getting richer not only on weapons orders themselves, projects, kickbacks, etc., but also forcing their vassals to buy these weapons.
      And in this regard, the proverb comes to mind - if a weapon hangs on the wall, in the last act it must shoot.
      A serious discussion about the possibility of nuclear war is increasingly taking place. People, especially young people, are being hammered into their heads now that a nuclear conflict is not as destructive to humanity and the planet as is commonly believed.
    2. g1washntwn
      g1washntwn 5 December 2018 09: 35
      +2
      "Will not fight" is completely wrong. They are at war with everyone without ceasing, just after receiving a gigantic nuclear counterweight they switched to other methods of undermining statehood and weaker goals.
      There is always war. Even when the guns are silent.
    3. Tank jacket
      Tank jacket 5 December 2018 09: 54
      -2
      And not only everyone is trying to make the Maidan-Swamp. And the Kerch incident, probing the borders, the population and managers for readiness for the Maidan riots, and the pension reform and so on, and there the occupation corps are already pulled up, they want to set fire to the inside ...
      1. avebersek
        avebersek 5 December 2018 22: 52
        0
        As usual, the Russian people should do ....
    4. Altona
      Altona 5 December 2018 10: 14
      -1
      Quote: Svarog
      America will not fight with us .. Everyone wants to live.

      ----------------------
      Will our crowned burghers be? Already now, like Kolchak, they are trying to hide something stolen from the people through the Japs, and the Japs of the island are trying to get in for it, hiding behind a "peace treaty."
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 5 December 2018 09: 05
    +2
    The historical axiom is that they always kick the weak, conquer, burn, destroy, and when the enemy is equal in strength, then the world comes, fragile but the world ...
    1. cniza
      cniza 5 December 2018 09: 33
      +1
      So it was and it should be so, the United States has completely fallen off the brakes.
    2. Altona
      Altona 5 December 2018 10: 15
      0
      Quote: Alexey-74
      The historical axiom is that they always kick the weak, conquer, burn, destroy, and when the enemy is equal in strength, then the world comes, fragile but the world ...

      ------------------
      That's it, as we cover our faces with our hands and hide from growing problems, it will be so. They will continue to kick until everything is taken away. And we, and our powerful hucksters.
  6. Carib
    Carib 5 December 2018 09: 25
    +1
    As far as I understand, the main Anglo-American industrial and financial clans influencing US policy are well known. Maybe just 10 - 20 nuclear warheads can give target designation to their tribal nests, locks. And announce it publicly, with coordinates. And then just adjust the place of stay, rest. When you firmly know that your home as goal number 1, the desire to play dangerously, to maneuver will disappear forever.
    1. cniza
      cniza 5 December 2018 09: 32
      +3
      Such things are not announced loudly, but they are done and then in a narrow circle lucidly explain everything, but for this they need brains to perceive and comprehend.
    2. Altona
      Altona 5 December 2018 10: 25
      +1
      Quote: Carib
      And announce it publicly, with coordinates.

      -----------------------
      To do this, political titanium eggs must be at least. In 1991 the USSR had much more military hardware, but it did not help.
  7. cniza
    cniza 5 December 2018 09: 30
    +2
    “By threatening to destroy the American elite, Russia is preventing a nuclear war, thereby saving the people of the United States from monstrous victims,


    One trouble they did not have leaders of such a level who are able to understand this, they all think that it’s like on a computer ...
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 5 December 2018 20: 40
      +1
      Quote: cniza
      ... there are no leaders of this level left who can understand this ...

      Trump-ling is essentially a puppet. And the world government is pulling the strings. The Bilderberg club is still ruled by the cap. the world. Even here, Red (he didn’t come up with it himself - the OBS whispered!) Was put over the country as a beholder ... So, you should talk with the owners, and not with slaves, even very high-ranking ones. And to hint to them transparently that Foggy Albion with the beginning of the TMV goes to the "underwater" position, the Swiss cantons are densely seeded with ash from the fields of Europe, and the States are generally washed away by the tsunami. We don't have to talk about the rest, I guess that's enough! yes
      1. cniza
        cniza 5 December 2018 20: 50
        +1
        I think they understand this, but pride is higher so far, yet ...
  8. NordUral
    NordUral 5 December 2018 09: 30
    0
    Only the fear of imminent death will stop the Anglo-Saxon gangster elite.
    1. Altona
      Altona 5 December 2018 10: 36
      0
      Quote: NordUral
      Only fear of imminent death

      ------------------
      What's the use of "fear of death" to threaten, if on other sites snot to swing on the fist?
  9. baruh
    baruh 5 December 2018 10: 11
    -11
    I doubt something that Russia has a nuclear shield, and in what condition it is. you need a lot of money to follow all this, and the necessary technical base and support. there is none of this. the budget is empty, or rather, it is with Putin’s friends — cooks, security guards, etc. Well, right now, oil is already pumping in Syria, for which the Syrian company was actually conceived. Yes, and for whom download, for pensions? .. no, everything is for the same ... that’s what the guys died for Zolotov and other riffraffers that are in Navalny’s commercials.
    1. FORCE 38GB
      FORCE 38GB 5 December 2018 10: 29
      +1
      We have a nuclear shield ALL SHIELDS SHIELD !!! Three nuclear components are stuffed to the teeth! bully It will be necessary - and we will launch the BZHRK. In the fresh version :)
    2. Sarmat Sanych
      Sarmat Sanych 5 December 2018 10: 32
      +1
      What a dull pimple bot (((. Is there really no new shamefullaughing?
    3. Vlad5307
      Vlad5307 5 December 2018 10: 33
      +1
      To such gullible "kids" who give a shit about Russia, these servants of the State Department have seriously fucked up their brains with their videos. Simplicity is worse than stealing! fool
  10. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 5 December 2018 10: 36
    +4
    The war, of course, continues ... now they are fighting for the minds of our children and grandchildren ... we will lose this war ... and that’s all ... all the created nuclear potential will be useless ... Youth should not be given up ... this is a strategic task ...
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 5 December 2018 20: 48
      0
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Young people can not give ... this is a strategic task ...

      I will correct a little, with your permission.
      Youth is the future of any country. And it depends on you and me what this future will be! The main thing is not to say about our descendants in the future: "Dwarfs on the shoulders of giants!"
  11. The poor man
    The poor man 5 December 2018 10: 47
    +1
    In order to wean the State Department from ultimatums, nadyty constantly come up with something else like that.
  12. Redfox3k
    Redfox3k 5 December 2018 10: 55
    +3
    As the Anglo-Saxons were pirate bandits, so they remained. Genes, however. But the bandit is not afraid of the laws, he is afraid only of force.
  13. Old26
    Old26 5 December 2018 11: 12
    0
    Quote: siberalt
    All countries possessing nuclear weapons must enter the INF Treaty. Otherwise, there is no point. For it can fly from where it was not expected.winked

    When the contract was concluded, 2-3 countries had such weapons, and in quantities much smaller than the arsenal of the USSR and the USA. It is almost impossible to conclude such an agreement. The parties have too different interests. Try, for example, to force India and Pakistan to eliminate medium-range weapons (missiles). Two countries that from time to time have been at war with each other for more than half a century. For them, medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads are an insurance policy against the fact that the other side will not use nuclear weapons against them.

    Or, for example, try to eliminate medium-range missiles from Iran, for example. When all his opponents are exactly in the range of this weapon. Or Israel, which Iran has long wanted to wipe off the face of the earth. An air strike on Iran is unlikely and can only be targeted. But the MRBM will reach Tehran with a 100% guarantee. Unless only China can agree to this. And the point is in such a contract. Again, there will be countries "not covered" by the treaty, as now

    Quote: Carib
    Maybe just 10 - 20 nuclear warheads can give target designation to their tribal nests, locks. And announce it publicly, with coordinates. And then just adjust the place of stay, rest.

    And will it stop them? And if they separate, how will you redirect the YBG? Mother and father will leave in one direction, son with daughter in the other, and grandchildren return to university ?? And this is nonsense, your suggestion. Moreover, they will turn all this to their advantage, exposing it as an aggressive essence of Russia. Yes, and it’s not so easy to redirect nuclear weapons to every body movement of their elite

    Quote: FORCE 38RUS
    We have a nuclear shield ALL SHIELDS SHIELD !!! Three nuclear components are stuffed to the teeth! bully It will be necessary - and we will launch the BZHRK. In the fresh version :)

    Exactly. Stuffed to the teeth. And I thought, why is it being written off in such an amount that we lack one and a half hundred carriers to the ceiling of START-3. It turns out "stuffed to the teeth." Now it is clear.

    And Sivkov's article is just another nonsense. It would be better if he came up with coefficients and compared fleets by them. It turns out more scientific. And then, on a wave of euphoria, he declares that "Poseidon" and "Sarmat" will make war impossible because it will lead to the destruction of the US elite?
    "Poseidon". Someone did not pass the tests in full, but only at the test site. It is impossible to extrapolate the results of field tests to a torpedo with an intercontinental range. And we cannot carry out such a test. For this will be perceived as an attack. And where will the torpedo hit, about the guidance errors of which at such distances is generally unknown? Going nowhere? Or does Sivkov think that by hitting the bases of the fleet we will destroy the American elite? They will probably wait out the war not in bunkers, somewhere in the Rocky Mountains, but in a bungalow on the coast ??? Whom does he hold for the urakov? Theirs or us.

    How does the "Sarmat" differ from other weapons systems that were and are in service with Russia? Is he capable of destroying the North American continent with one launch? And it’s ridiculous to say something about a system that has not yet had a single flight test, let alone tests at the maximum range ..

    In short. Article - minus ...
  14. Maximxnumx
    Maximxnumx 5 December 2018 19: 33
    -1
    writes Konstantin Sivkov, doctor of military sciences in his article

    It is already dohtur! For what, for the same thing, for which they gave epaulettes? For nifiga?