Military Review

The new version of the Zanzavod "Shell" will go on state tests in 2019 year

43
The Russian promising anti-aircraft missile-cannon complex "Pantsir-SM-SV" will be released for state trials next year, Interfax-AVN reports, citing materials from the public procurement website.


The new version of the Zanzavod "Shell" will go on state tests in 2019 year


According to the materials placed on the site of state procurement, next year it is planned to complete the preliminary tests of the complex and go to the state. It is stated that the new complex compared to existing samples will have significantly higher performance, which will be achieved, including the installation of a new radar module with an active phased array. Details about the new complex are not reported, but according to available information, the complex will receive new anti-aircraft missiles, allowing to increase the range.

Earlier in the holding company "High-Precision Complexes", which is the developer and manufacturer of the Pantsyr air-defense missile system of all modifications, stated that they are developing a new modification of the complex that can fight drones. The complex will be called "Pantsir-C1M". In view of the objective reasons, the characteristics of the complex were classified.

ZRPK "shell" - air defense complex short-range. The non-upgraded complex is capable of detecting up to 12 targets. The 30-mm gun is installed on it, the 76 and 90 mm rocket launchers are used. Ammunition - a half thousand cannon shots, 12 missiles. One of the tasks performed is the task of covering a long-range air defense system, including the Triumph C-400.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
43 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. URAL72
    URAL72 1 December 2018 12: 26
    +13
    AFAR is good. I hope soon more detailed information appears and all the skeptics shut up. It is good if the AFAR modules are unified with the ship and aircraft, - a large series reduces the cost, but increasing the range is a dubious step - short-range missiles should be cheaper and easier. The carapace is needed to combat the means of destruction, and not their carriers, for this there are much more long-range systems.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 1 December 2018 12: 39
    +17
    The firing range of the upgraded Shell is doubled, that is, from 20 km to 40 km. Target detection up to 75 km. That is, in fact, the upgraded Shell will no longer be a short-range air defense system, but closer to a medium-range air defense system.
    It is also pleasing that the new missiles will be compatible with the unmodernized Shell.
    1. Yodzakura
      Yodzakura 1 December 2018 12: 41
      +1
      I wonder what can a tor be more effective?
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 1 December 2018 12: 47
        +4
        Quote: Yodzakura
        I wonder what can a tor be more effective?

        The TOR has other tasks ..
        "Tor" (GRAU index - 9K330, according to the classification of the US Ministry of Defense and NATO - SA-15 Gauntlet ("Plate Gauntlet")) - an all-weather tactical anti-aircraft missile system (SAM), designed to solve the problems of air defense and missile defense at the level of the division link.



        Shell-C1 (GRAU index - 96K6, at the development stage it had the verbal name “Tunguska-3”, according to NATO codification - SA-22 Greyhound (from the English - “greyhound”)) - Russian self-propelled anti-aircraft missile and cannon system (SAM) land and sea based.
        It is intended for short-range protection of civilian and military objects (including long-range air defense systems) from all modern and prospective means of air attack. It can also protect the defended object against ground and surface threats.
        1. gemini
          gemini 1 December 2018 21: 46
          -2
          Both air defense systems are near zone. Thor, however, is a military air defense. The effectiveness of the TOP is an order of magnitude higher than the notorious "Shell" according to the results of joint tests at Kapyar in 2011 or 2012. The "Pantsir" has a bicaliber missile, in which the main stage has no engine. The launcher has worked and that's it. How, in this situation, to shoot down vigorously maneuvering targets, especially at a distance close to the maximum? The reason why "Pantsir" went into service is simple. T. Serdyukov has a good friend working at Kamaz.
      2. Hypersound
        Hypersound 1 December 2018 13: 07
        -8
        In Syria, Thor proved to be much more effective against small drones, every 3 times or something. More precisely, it was not so much Thor who abandoned it, but how much the Shell failed with a defeat efficiency of around 30%
        1. ultra
          ultra 1 December 2018 14: 42
          +7
          Quote: Hypersound
          In Syria, Thor proved to be much more effective against small drones, every 3 times or something.

          Where does the infa come from? Do you work in the Moscow Region or in Tula at KBP?
          1. Comrade Beria
            Comrade Beria 1 December 2018 18: 51
            +2
            Military expert Murakhovsky apparently blurted out a drink on the entire Internet, and sobered up in the morning and denied everything. :)
            But it's late. Now he is in many places shaking hands.
          2. bayard
            bayard 1 December 2018 19: 50
            +2
            Donetsk.
            This is affected by the characteristics of the radar. Drones for attacks on our objects were specially created as inconspicuous precisely for the Carapace radar. In the new version, the radar is of a different, greater power and excellent signature. Actually, this is a land version of the Sea Shell. And that is great . And in the sense of unification, and in the sense of expanded combat capabilities.
          3. Hypersound
            Hypersound 1 December 2018 20: 31
            0
            Read news
            1. Mestny
              Mestny 2 December 2018 02: 04
              -2
              Where? On Echo of Moscow "?
          4. Hypersound
            Hypersound 1 December 2018 20: 36
            +1
            https://news.rambler.ru/weapon/41175366-noveyshie-zenitnye-kompleksy-rf-v-sirii-okazalis-provalnymi/
            The effectiveness of the Thor is 80%, the Shell is 19%. Not even 3, but 4 times worse
        2. venik
          venik 1 December 2018 20: 33
          +2
          Quote: Hypersound
          The carapace failed with a hit efficiency of around 30%

          ==============
          The primary source - TO THE STUDIO !!!! Or is this source - "OBS" ??? wassat fool
          But this is already more interesting:

          Please pay attention to the numbers in the plate ..... incl. in the column "Missile consumption" .....
          1. Harry.km
            Harry.km 2 December 2018 08: 07
            +1
            Quote: venik
            Please pay attention to the numbers in the plate ..... incl. in the column "Missile consumption" .....

            Yeah, they did. Third line from the bottom: Drifting balloon - SAM consumption 2.
            1. abc_alex
              abc_alex 3 December 2018 10: 45
              0
              AND? Balloons are actually one of the most difficult targets for air defense systems. In the USSR, even a special high-altitude interceptor was made to deal with drifting balloons.
              1. Harry.km
                Harry.km 3 December 2018 11: 30
                0
                Quote: abc_alex
                Balloons are actually one of the most difficult targets for air defense systems

                And what is the difficulty of getting into a standing target?
                1. abc_alex
                  abc_alex 3 December 2018 12: 05
                  +1
                  Well, firstly, it is not standing. You thought it was about tethered balloons. Why so? Balloons move where the wind carries and sometimes quite unpredictably. In addition, they can rise to a very large height.
                  And most importantly, they are almost completely radiolucent. It’s hard to hit because it’s hard to aim.
    2. Muvka
      Muvka 1 December 2018 12: 45
      -4
      Quote: NEXUS
      The firing range of the upgraded Shell is doubled, that is, from 20 km to 40 km. Target detection up to 75 km. That is, in fact, the upgraded Shell will no longer be a short-range air defense system, but closer to a medium-range air defense system.
      It is also pleasing that the new missiles will be compatible with the unmodernized Shell.

      But it would be better if they did not increase the range, but reduce the dimensions and cost of the rocket, with the same parameters ...
      1. lopvlad
        lopvlad 1 December 2018 13: 12
        +9
        Quote: Muvka
        But it would be better if they did not increase the range, but reduce the dimensions and cost of the rocket, with the same parameters ...


        doubled range is twice the time spent working on the target (for simplicity you will have time not for one shot but for two, respectively, and the enemy’s chances to overcome the armor’s area of ​​responsibility will be half as much).
        I am glad that the modernization is carried out promptly according to the results of the application in Syria.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 1 December 2018 13: 38
          +1
          I am also happy, but it seems to me that it’s like with an airplane wing. If the excess strength, you need to simplify the design.
        2. Rabioso
          Rabioso 1 December 2018 22: 56
          -4
          Let the moderators not consider it a provocation ... But Israeli planes in Syria both bombed and bombed ... with shells and c300
      2. figwam
        figwam 1 December 2018 17: 31
        +3
        Quote: Muvka
        But it would be better if they did not increase the range, but reduce the dimensions and cost of the rocket, with the same parameters ...

        Everything has been invented ...
        1. Bogatyrev
          Bogatyrev 1 December 2018 21: 29
          0
          Need a complex to cover artillery fire from the model of Amer. MHTK (based on MML). The direction is right, but these characteristics are not enough. But the artillery and HIMARS - in Syria you can see - often the normal zones in A2AD are turned off and the S-300 is not deployed.
          1. abc_alex
            abc_alex 3 December 2018 10: 59
            0
            The fire performance of the Msta-S battery of 4 vehicles is 32 rounds per minute. Think the rest yourself.
    3. Vasyan1971
      Vasyan1971 1 December 2018 19: 11
      +1
      "Due to objective reasons, the characteristics of the complex were classified."
      And right there:
      Quote: NEXUS
      The firing range of the upgraded Shell is doubled, that is, from 20 km to 40 km. Target detection up to 75 km.

      Either - bullshit, or "a talker is a godsend for a spy."
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 1 December 2018 19: 24
        +2
        Quote: Vasyan1971
        Either - bullshit, or "a talker is a godsend for a spy."

        Dear, what the author wrote about secrecy is partially true. Yes, only the detection radius and range of new missiles were announced, this is also a fact.
        At the same time, a selection and analysis of publications on this topic give us the opportunity to make up some idea of ​​the idea of ​​Tula gunsmiths. As follows from media reports, a new radar module has been developed for “Shell-SM”. It is equipped with a multifunctional aiming station with doubled (compared with the serial version) detection range of a typical air target. The following figures are called: 75 km against 30-35 km earlier. Improved radar capabilities are important not only on their own, but also to unleash the potential of a new missile: the claimed maximum range of an air target is 40 km versus 20 km for the serial 57E6 SAM. The updated version of the “Carapace” will be easily “identified” visually: instead of the KAMAZ-6560 chassis, it is supposed to use the KAMAZ-53958 created under the Tornado program.


        Last year, there was information that the Shell-C2 complex was spotted on the Khmeimim base.
        Calculations ZRPK "Shell-C2" is entrusted today to carry out combat duty at the Khmeimim airbase, covering, together with the S-400, the Russian airborne forces operating in Syria. By the way, the highlight of the complex is the possibility of its use both for air targets (aircraft, helicopters, remotely piloted aircraft and high-precision weapons), and for mobile ground targets.

        The 2A38M automatic gun uses armor-piercing incendiary cartridges with an initial flight speed of 960 meters per second. Such characteristics of weapons allow you to hit, for example, armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles. At the same time, the “Shell” during operation guarantees the protection of its equipment from any interference, provides the highest accuracy of target designation, and in addition, it works in automatic mode until a decision is made on delivering a fire strike.
        1. Vasyan1971
          Vasyan1971 2 December 2018 08: 12
          +2
          Quote: NEXUS
          As follows from media reports

          So the bullshit.
  3. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 1 December 2018 12: 39
    +4
    If you increase the effectiveness of the cannon segment, it will be generally excellent.
    1. lopvlad
      lopvlad 1 December 2018 13: 21
      +5
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      If the effectiveness of the cannon segment increases


      the limit on the range of guns when using "blanks" has already been exhausted, only the rate of fire remains, and this accordingly requires an increase in the weight of the shells carried for it, which is critical for a mobile complex.
      For me, so in the Shell the iron guns are ideal and if it needs to be improved, this is the software of the complex.
      1. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 1 December 2018 13: 49
        +2
        Quote: lopvlad
        the limit on the range of guns when using "blanks" has already been exhausted

        And here is their range? It's about the accuracy of guidance, tracking and stabilization.
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 1 December 2018 12: 49
    +11
    The range of action of small-caliber MANPADS up to 40 km is the result of the improvement of solid rocket fuel by our chemists ... New energy - new speed and range-altitude of ammunition. "Dagger" is also solid fuel. And ... "Iskander" wassat
    And the first swallow was "Willow" ... which after the Needle added a kilometer in height. In the same dimensions.
  5. Hypersound
    Hypersound 1 December 2018 13: 04
    -24
    That's right, after the failure of the Shell in Syria, they definitely need to be further developed.
    1. Interlocutor
      Interlocutor 1 December 2018 14: 48
      +9
      You are talking about failure. Give 3 examples. With a description and links to primary sources. If you cannot, then you are a "Chatterbox".
  6. Observer2014
    Observer2014 1 December 2018 13: 28
    +7
    The new version of the Zanzavod "Shell" will go on state tests in 2019 year
    If a shell with remote detonation was made for the gun !!!! It will be just an armageddon for aviation, and for the "pocket" one as well. Cheap drones will simply crumble from one shell.
  7. rocket757
    rocket757 1 December 2018 14: 00
    +2
    Of course, universalism, and not a variety of graders, is optimal for many reasons, BUT !!!
    Universalism in everything, identity is fraught. This is a real competition, who will be able to make SAM more effective than others !!!
    I’m watching, reading, uh, I'm glad that our sky will be locked again!
  8. 23424636
    23424636 1 December 2018 14: 02
    -2
    Quote: Hypersound
    In Syria, Thor proved to be much more effective against small drones, every 3 times or something. More precisely, it was not so much Thor who abandoned it, but how much the Shell failed with a defeat efficiency of around 30%

    The strike is unambiguous and the most important thing is that it is in the theory of defeating moving targets, which came from a fading academician Shipunov .- rudely knocking down the target not with a mass of small striking elements but in bulk to off course, But the cheapness of this alignment proved itself in Syria with a probability of 0.3. Here we are saving the propagated Tula samovar
  9. Tektor
    Tektor 1 December 2018 14: 05
    0
    It seems to me that the new "nail" of the Pantsir may turn out to be extremely effective: four small-sized missiles installed in the container of a standard missile "Pantsir" of 170/90 mm caliber; if these "nails" provide BMPT and Derivation-air defense. To use Nails, the BMPT must have a radar capable of distinguishing not only enemy manpower in bad weather, but also aircraft. For example, Farah or Sobolyatnik.
  10. Hypersound
    Hypersound 1 December 2018 15: 55
    -2
    By the way, I looked at the dynamics of the FlobalFirePower index, and if the trend continues, then already in 2019 the Russian army will become, according to this American rating, the most powerful in the world. It is clear that this position is very conditional and all 3 military hegemons of the world (the United States, Russia and China) are very close, but nonetheless.

    And this is practically without taking into account nuclear weapons, mainly considered conventional forces. The presence of a vigorous bomb there gives only some small bonus and that’s it. That is, that it gives some kind of small bonus to France, that the Russian nuclear armada is exactly the same small bonus)) Given nuclear weapons, I think we are already No. 1, as we have more heads (both strategists and tactical ones), and delivery vehicles are more progressive. The United States is planning to invest heavily in them only in the 25-30s ... And even then they don’t know where to get the money.

    It is worth noting China - they are progressing even faster than us. Just a little bit, but faster. If the trend continues, then in 19 and 20 we will be in this ranking in 1st place, and in 2021 China will lead it. But then again, given the Nucleus, we, of course, are much more powerful than Asians. Well, at least, they are our partners, if not friends, then, in the normal sense of the word. And not pseudo partners from the West, which are actually rivals, and even enemies.

    It is also worth noting that the United States received a bonus for the state in NATO, although it seems to me a dubious thing. Rather, Nato is more of a burden for them and a minus than a plus. Without this bonus, perhaps already this year we would have taken 1st place

    In short, in a few years Russia and China will share the first place in conventional forces, and the Russian Federation will be single-handed in terms of aggregate nuclear weapons with Army No. 1. Usa, as usual, will only trail No. 2 after the Russian Federation and China. We look forward to the final slide of America from a superpower to just a regional one with some weight in the world, but it’s not nearly as hegemonic as in the 90s and zero
  11. spectr
    spectr 1 December 2018 18: 00
    -8
    Recently it slipped on the network that the Carapace was not seen (and was lost). And here is the message that there is a modernized Shell with an updated AFAR. It really seems that the Shells in Syria are getting better.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 1 December 2018 19: 26
      +5
      Quote: spectr
      It really seems that the Shells in Syria are getting better.

      No ... it looks more like you got scratched here.
      1. spectr
        spectr 2 December 2018 21: 25
        0
        And why such an insult?
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Dietmar
    Dietmar 1 December 2018 21: 47
    +7
    [quote = Muvka]
    [/ Quote]
    But it would be better if they did not increase the range, but reduce the dimensions and cost of the rocket, with the same parameters ... [/ quote]

  14. Old26
    Old26 2 December 2018 18: 01
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    It is also pleasing that the new missiles will be compatible with the unmodernized Shell.

    A missile with a doubled range is unlikely to fit on the old launcher .. In addition, the radar on the unmodified launcher will be old, it makes sense to use a new missile if the radar does not see the target at the same range as on the modernized launcher

    Quote: Hypersound
    In Syria, Thor proved to be much more effective against small drones, every 3 times or something. More precisely, it was not so much Thor who abandoned it, but how much the Shell failed with a defeat efficiency of around 30%

    The media will write something different. We have a lot of experts. There was one such person, he held the post of Deputy Minister of Defense, so he chipped off such "khokhmachki" that it was just right to ask a question, but was his brain okay ... So here. Initially, a complex with the parameters of "Shell" cannot be worse than "Thor", having characteristics higher than those of "Thor"

    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    And the first swallow was "Willow" ... which after the Needle added a kilometer in height. In the same dimensions.

    It is precisely in the same dimensions that a height of 1 km is added. And then twice in the same mass dimensions ???