Ways to deal with tanks equipped with dynamic protection

Comments

[Dust]

I saw the author’s familiar name and the desire to read the article to the end disappeared - I was afraid to get on a hackneyed record ...

[crossbow]

Analysis of the layout of tanks and their combat use showed that the tank could be hit without armor penetration. At the same time, it is necessary that the ammunition with a powerful explosive or kinetic energy carries out a powerful impulse effect on the body of the bronzesel. This impact disables the internal units of the tank.

In-in, the explosion of a high-explosive shell on the armor and the crew, in principle, kirdyk, in addition, all sights will fly, and a blind tank is scrap.

[Redpartyzan]

At the same time, there are many examples where a dz or composite armor could withstand a projectile and nothing, the tank did not fail and continued to carry out the combat mission.

[755962]

A rocket fired from a helicopter is destroyed by the Trophy active defense system. And here it is necessary to make a small digression.
The Israeli complex of active protection of tanks against missiles is also shown for the first time abroad and is a source of particular pride for Israelis, since there is nothing of the kind on either American, or German, or French tanks. Alas, there are no such systems on Russian cars. But at the end of the 1980-ies in the USSR for the first time in the world, the Arena armored vehicles active protection system was created, tested and prepared for mass production. This system to this day completely exceeds the Israeli Trophy. That's just in the Russian armored units no one has ever seen the Arena, except at some exhibition, while the Israeli tank crews have active defense created by the company RAFAEL. And there is no explanation for this paradox.

[ProkletyiPirat]

Quote: 755962

And there is no explanation for this paradox.

How is it not? we don’t have money for it, Israel has a hundred tanks, and we have thousands, even tens of thousands.

[Denzel13]

Exactly exactly, it happened somehow from the 2A42 cannon that the BMD-2 is equipped with OFZ shells on t-72 shells, and it has 600 rounds per minute, as a result the tank stood up + the crew in a complete stupor, in the sense of tightly shell-shocked.

[atos_kin]

Good, solid article.

[Ridder]

author Rewrite the article, you know little about armored vehicles. How can you write:

Since the fight against tanks is one of the main tasks of almost all military branches

. The article is weak, the sources are old, the information is crumpled. If you need to write such articles, you need to break it up into several reviews: Russian/USSR, USA/NATO, experience of fighting tanks equipped with dynamic protection.
I advise you to read in these books there is a lot of detailed information.
TANKS. UNIQUE AND PARADOXAL.
tank sword of the country of the Soviets.

[Brother Sarych]

Well, they made fun of - send Rastopshin "himself" to study the primary sources! I am delighted...
Although the link to the literature of twenty years ago at the end of the article simply touches ...

[borisst64]

The article is very crude. First of all, it is counteraction to remote sensing shells. This is tantamount to throwing a grenade in front of you to repel the bullets. DZ fights with cumulative shells, there is no other!

"the complete collapse of armored units in the Chechen events when using domestic grenade launcher weapons." The most - the most "T-72 and T-80 burned like matches."

Where does this information come from? Did you communicate with the tankmen? Or maybe with fighters who spit in the direction of our tanks?

Our tanks once again proved their strength and survivability, and withstood multiple RPG hits. And if the tank was attached to the unit, then the fighters knew - there is a STRENGTH nearby.

[Ridder]

In Chechnya, tanks were not used correctly, and when a tank is sent back to the city without infantry cover, of course it will be blown up, in each house there are several dozen "bearded" RPGs. In Chechnya, there were many cases with the survivability of our tanks, but the most famous T80 withstood 18 (!) Hits from the RPG "fly".

[KA]

It is interesting why the question of destroying a tank (penetration of a tank’s armor) is everywhere considered, and the question of incapacitating a tank is not considered anywhere (reducing combat effectiveness).
For example, take a can of paint and explode over a tank on the battlefield, a driver, a gunner, a commander can’t see anything, the whole tank will be temporarily out of order and now it’s just a target! Of course, I joked with a can of paint, but there are many ways to disable a tank, which for some reason are not considered by anyone.

[Brother Sarych]

Better according to the method of Shurik from Operation Y - with a trowel, throw a solution!

[Tourist Breakfast]

In Lebanese events, with the help of DZ, the overall resistance of armor protection of old tanks (Centurion, Sheridan, M-48A3, M-60) from the cumulative grenades of domestic RPGs widely used in this conflict was significantly increased.

Where are the Sheridan tanks in Lebanon from?

[Suvorov000]

A strange article, to say the least, the subject matter is not disclosed, the material is poorly selected, there isn’t all the data on foreign tanks and means of dealing with them, there’s nothing at all, the methods themselves are not described, the article is nothing

[Brother Sarych]

The commentators are not familiar with the work of the "great connoisseur" of means of fighting domestic tanks M. Rastopshin - otherwise most of the questions would have been removed automatically!

[datur]

Brother Sarych, yeah, you're right, these specialists, historians, cutters, Latin, pigs, milk thistles, just got it !!!!!!

[Leksander]

Another statement on the topic: "I heard a ringing somewhere ..."

[aiden]

the author would take the example of Donbas, where tanks hung with dz scattered into parts.