Military Review

Chronicles of electronic warfare: the beginning

28
The Russian Maritime Technical Committee, as far back as 1902, reported in one of the reports: “Wiring without wires has the disadvantage that the telegram can be caught on any foreign radio station and, therefore, read, interrupted and confused by other sources of electricity.” Perhaps it was this statement that became for many years the quintessence of electronic warfare in all subsequent wars. In Russia, Alexander Stepanovich Popov became the pioneer of theoretical calculations related to EW in 1903, who formulated the basic ideas of radio intelligence and combat in his memorandum to the military ministry. However, the idea of ​​EW was put into practice in the USA in 1901, when engineer John Rickard used his radio station to “jam” informational programs of competing media. All история concerned the broadcasting of the America's Cup yacht regatta on the radio, and Rickard himself worked for the American Wireless Telephone & Telegraph news agency, which wished to retain the "exclusive rights" to broadcast at any cost.




In a combat situation, radio resistance was first used in the Russo-Japanese War. So, in accordance with the order No. 27 of Vice Admiral S. O. Makarov to all forces fleet it was prescribed to observe strict radio discipline and use all the capabilities to detect radio broadcasts of the enemy. The Japanese worked in a similar way, carrying out direction finding of ship radio stations with determining the distance to the source. In addition, the practice began to include interception of enemy messages, however, he did not receive much distribution - there was an acute shortage of translators.

Chronicles of electronic warfare: the beginning

Vice Admiral Stepan Osipovich Makarov

Radio wrestling in the full sense of the word was first implemented 2 April 1904, when the Japanese once again began to fire at Port Arthur from heavy guns. The cruisers Kasuga and Nissin worked with their 254-mm and 203-mm calibers from a decent distance, hiding behind Cape Liaoteshan. Correction of fire from such a range was problematic, so the Japanese equipped a pair of armored cruisers for visual control of the shelling. The observers were located at a comfortable distance from the coast and were inaccessible to the Russian artillery. Naturally, all adjustments for the main calibers "Kasuga" and "Nissin" were transmitted via radio. The command of the Russian fleet in this situation equipped the squadron battleship Victory and a radio station on Golden Mount, which jointly interrupted the working frequencies of the Japanese. The tactic was so successful that not a single projectile from Kasuga and Nissin did any damage to Port Arthur. And the Japanese have released them more than two hundred!


Squadron battleship "Victory" in Port Arthur. 1904

In 1999, the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation announced 15 on April (2 of April on old style) as the Day of Electronic Warfare Specialist, which is still an official holiday. The advantage of the Russians in that episode was not only successful tactics of application, but technical superiority over the Japanese. Thus, the Japanese fleet used quite primitive radio stations that could not change the frequency of work, which greatly simplified their suppression. But in Russia, they could boast of high-class domestic radio stations from the Kronstadt workshop of making wireless telegraph apparatuses, as well as Russian-French ones from Popov-Dyukrete-Tissot. There were also German “Telefunken” with English “Marconi”. This technique was powerful (more than 2 kW), it allowed changing the operating frequencies and even changing the power to reduce the probability of detection. The top-level equipment of the Russians has become a particularly powerful radio station, Telefunken, which allows keeping communication at distances exceeding 1100 kilometers. It was installed on the basis of the Ural cruiser, which is part of 2 of the Pacific squadron of Vice Admiral Zinovy ​​Petrovich Rozhestvensky. The station of similar capacity №2 was installed in the Vladivostok fortress. Naturally, the 4,5-kilowatt Telefunken was a dual-use product — it was planned to be used to silence Japanese radio communications on the principle of a “big spark” due to a much higher radio signal power. However, there was a serious danger of reciprocal counteraction by the Japanese fleet, which could capture such a “super station” and opened artillery fire at the source.


Auxiliary cruiser Ural. Tsushima Strait, 1905

Obviously, ZP Rozhestvensky thought about this when he banned the captain of the “Ural” from jamming the Japanese at the approach to the Tsushima Strait of 14 in May of 1905. During the battle itself, the Russian ships partially used their capabilities in suppressing enemy radio communications, and after the battle, the remnants of the squadron during the retreat were looking for Japanese ships to avoid unwanted contacts.

Gradually, the skills of radio suppression and direction finding became mandatory in the fleets of all major powers. Back in 1902-1904, the British and US naval forces tried out new tactics during the exercise. And the British in 1904, intercepted the Russian radiograms and read their contents without difficulty. Fortunately, there were enough translators in the Admiralty.


Alexey Alekseevich Petrovsky

The second major battlefield where EW was used was, of course, the First World War. Before the start of the conflict in Russia, Aleksei Alekseevich Petrovsky created a theoretical basis for substantiating the methods of creating radio interference, and, not least, he described methods for protecting radio communications from unauthorized interception. Petrovsky worked at the Naval Academy and was the head of the laboratory of the Marine Telegraph Wireless Telegraph Depot. The theoretical calculations of the Russian engineer were practically tested on the Black Sea Fleet just before the start of the WWI. According to their results, ship radio telegraphists were taught to get rid of enemy interference during radio communication sessions. But not only in Russia developed a similar branch of military affairs. In Austria-Hungary and France, special forces began to operate from the 1908 on intercepting the enemy’s military and government communications. Such radio interception tools were used during the Bosnian crisis of the 1908 of the year, as well as in the Italian-Turkish war of the 1911 of the year. And in the latter case, the work of the Austrian intelligence services made it possible to make strategic decisions relating to countering possible Italian intervention. At the forefront of the EW in those days was Britain, which, throughout the First World War, read the German cipher messages, filling her hand in front of the famous “Ultra” operation during the Second World War.


British Pride - Grand Fleet

In August 1914, the Admiralty, organized a special “40 Room”, whose employees were engaged in radio interception on “Marconi” equipment designed specifically for this structure. And in 1915, the British launched a wide network of interception stations at the “Y stations” engaged in listening to German ships. And it was quite successful - on the basis of the interception data at the end of May 1916, the English naval armada was sent to meet the German forces, which resulted in the famous Jutland battle.
German radio intelligence was not so successful, but coped well with the interception of the Russian negotiations, the lion's share of which went on the air in clear text. The story of this will be in the second part of the cycle.

To be continued ....

Based on:
N. A. Kolesov, I. G. Nosenkov. Electronic warfare. From past experiments to the decisive front of the future. M .: Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, 2015.
Author:
Photos used:
rusdarpa.ru, wikipedia.ru
28 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Comrade
    Comrade 3 December 2018 06: 21
    +4
    2 April 1904 year, when the Japanese once again began to shell Port Arthur with heavy guns. The cruisers Kasuga and Nissin worked with their 254-mm and 203-mm calibers from a decent distance, hiding behind Cape Liaoteshan. Adjusting fire from such a range was problematic, so the Japanese equipped a pair of armored cruisers to visually control the shelling.

    The article is necessary and interesting, but inaccuracies spoil the impression.
    Assistance in adjusting the shooting was provided not by two armored cruisers, but by one armored deck, "Takasago". It was not Port Arthur that was bombarded, but the inner raid.
    1. ser56
      ser56 3 December 2018 11: 28
      +3
      The author is sorry for the novelty and importance of the topic! love
      I note that the order of ZPR was senseless and harmful - since the enemy reported the coordinates of 2TOE - bearing it no longer made sense. At the same time, direction finding accuracy is noticeably less than the reckoning of the Japanese intelligence officer ... feel
  2. Avior
    Avior 3 December 2018 09: 40
    +4
    The idea of ​​the article is interesting, but the factual base is very lame.
    Note to the author - the first radio direction finder was patented by the German scientist Scheiller in 1906 (interestingly, the first radar was patented two years earlier), so during the Russo-Japanese war no one could find anything.
    The first radio direction finder in Russia appeared only at the beginning of the First World War, and even coastal, and not ship, primitive ship direction finders in Russia appeared only during the First World War, it was difficult to use them — the ship had to describe the circulation to determine the direction of radiation.
  3. anzar
    anzar 3 December 2018 10: 23
    +3
    Began reading, but refused because of a number of "pearls")) Here:
    The Japanese worked in a similar way, carrying out direction finding (!) ship radio stations with determination of distance (!!) to the source

    However, there was a serious danger of retaliatory opposition from the Japanese fleet, capable of detecting such a "superstation" and open at source artillery fire (!!!)
    Obviously (!) thought about it Z. P. Rozhdestvensky, when he forbade the captain of the Urals to jam the Japanese when approaching the Tsushima Strait? !!!!!!!!!!

    Barely sustained UTB and the following finally finished)) Here:
    ... after the battle, the remains of the squadron during the retreat direction finding Japanese ships to avoid unwanted contact

    There was no strength to read further.
    1. Army soldier2
      Army soldier2 3 December 2018 10: 43
      +2
      Of course, they could not determine bearings on the source of radio emission during the REV. As V.I.Semenov, a participant in these events, testifies, radio specialists could determine if the source of radio emission is approaching or approaching and very approximately the distance to it (close / far).
      1. anzar
        anzar 3 December 2018 10: 56
        +1
        ... and very approximately the distance to it (close / far).

        Truly VERY approximate (by signal strength), i.e. a more powerful station seems closer. But according to the imagination of the author, Rozhdestvensky was afraid that the Japanese, according to these ART data. FIRE will lead (!) Not knowing the same direction to the goal. And UTB despite the fact that the enemy is in direct visibility was an amazing ....!
      2. KVU-NSVD
        KVU-NSVD 3 December 2018 11: 24
        +5
        The primitive methods of "proto-finding" (if I may put it that way) were also known in the RYA. And the author should forgive such liberties for an interesting topic. And one hundred percent sure - everything will be more accurate in the continuation. About radio in Tsushima - The Ural was prohibited from jamming, but it was explained by vain hopes to hide the choice of the place and time of passage by radio silence.
    2. race
      race 5 December 2018 21: 06
      +1
      And what exactly in this phrase did you get tired of? Have you noticed anything strange in the surname of the admiral?
  4. alatanas
    alatanas 3 December 2018 10: 41
    +3
    The second major theater of operations where electronic warfare was used was, naturally, the First World War.

    During the Balkan War of 1912, during the siege of Odrin (Edirne - tur.) By the Bulgarian troops, Turkish radio broadcasts were actively jammed.
  5. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 3 December 2018 10: 44
    +2
    Naturally, the 4,5-kilowatt Telefunken was a dual-use product - it was planned to use it to jam Japanese radio communications on the basis of the “big spark” principle due to the much greater radio signal power. However, there was a serious danger of reciprocal resistance of the Japanese fleet, capable of detecting such a “superstation” and artillery fire was opened at the source.
    Obviously, Z. P. Rozhdestvensky was thinking about this when he forbade the captain of the Urals to jam the Japanese when approaching the Tsushima Strait on May 14, 1905.

    The issue of using (more precisely, not using) a powerful radio station "Ural" for conducting electronic warfare has long been considered. It was not only the unmasking of the squadron by the jammer, but also in the frequency range for which the maximum radiation fell.
    The radio station of the cruiser Ural, designed to connect the 2nd Pacific Squadron with Vladivostok, had a greater range not only due to high power, but due to the use of a longer wavelength range, which was determined by the size of its antenna network. Such a station could not damage enemy receivers, and the regular radio station of any of the squadron ships could successfully solve the problem of suppressing enemy negotiations.

    Partala M. L. Someone interfered with the negotiations (from the history of the radio wave at sea). Gangut Magazine 1996. Issue. 11.P. 61-67

    What is the mismatch of the ranges was shown by the experience conducted by Essen on the BF after the RPE - then a 100-watt inter-decad communication transmitter provided stable communication despite the fact that cruisers transmitters of several kilowatts tried to interfere with its work.
    1. ser56
      ser56 3 December 2018 11: 32
      +3
      then there were spark transmitters - and they create interference in a wide range of waves ... feel
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 3 December 2018 17: 58
        +1
        Quote: ser56
        then there were spark transmitters - and they create interference in a wide range of waves ...

        Right. But the maximum radiation was all the same (it was determined by the antenna) - and at the Ural it was shifted to the region of the DW.
        It was not in vain that I cited an example after the BF exercises at Essen, when transmitters with a total power of 5 kW could not crush a "baby" of 100 W - because only a small part of their radiation fell into its range.
        By the way, EMNIP, the presence of a certain range of spark transmitters already been in the simpsons It was discussed at one time on Tsushima.
        1. ser56
          ser56 4 December 2018 14: 38
          0
          1) ZPR could not know the result of suppression at the BF exercises - therefore, this is his mistake, however, one of many ...
          2) The Japanese used long-distance communication, so that the frequencies were close ... and there was no frequency quenching then ...
  6. KVU-NSVD
    KVU-NSVD 3 December 2018 11: 15
    0
    A station of similar capacity No. 2 was installed in the Vladivostok fortress.
    It is strange that in Arthur the station did not have such power - in a siege, it would be very useful and would have an impact on the course of hostilities.
    However, there was a serious danger of reciprocal resistance of the Japanese fleet, capable of detecting such a “superstation” and artillery fire was opened at the source.
    Well, directioning would only work out roughly enough and shoot at this triangle would take a very long time to achieve the result - all the same, the technique of that time was not so perfect. And if you place the station in an underground shelter with only a radio tower, then you could shoot before the end of the war with very little result
    1. Avior
      Avior 3 December 2018 11: 19
      +3
      it simply was not in nature.
      Well, directioning would only work out roughly enough and shoot at this triangle would take a very long time to achieve the result - all the same, the technique of that time was not so perfect

      Bearing then did not know how
  7. Decimam
    Decimam 3 December 2018 19: 44
    +1
    "For example, the Japanese Navy used fairly primitive radio stations that were not capable of changing the operating frequency, which greatly simplified their suppression."
    An interesting source of such information, since all the battleships of the Japanese were equipped with Marconi radio stations
    1. Avior
      Avior 4 December 2018 09: 49
      -1
      I also doubt that this statement is true.
      The Japanese at that time were purchased from the British, and those radio business was at a high level.
  8. Aviator_
    Aviator_ 3 December 2018 22: 13
    0
    The topic is interesting. From my point of view, there is not enough historical review of communication technology when they switched from spark to continuous signal transmission (it seems that the Germans did it in 1918), hardware circuits, etc.
    1. Avior
      Avior 4 December 2018 00: 05
      0
      between the spark and electronic transmitters were still electric arc and electric machine, they were already continuous.
      The first electronic transmitter was invented by the Germans from Telefunken in 1913, but for some time the electronic and arc electronic machines were used in parallel; the electronic base was weak.
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 4 December 2018 08: 57
        +1
        This is what I wanted to see from the author, and so the note is about nothing. One joy is the qualified comments.
    2. region58
      region58 4 December 2018 01: 45
      +1
      Quote: Aviator_
      From my point of view there is not enough historical review

      With mine too. Interesting details open up. For example, radios with a burner - the progenitor of radio tubes:

      In 1903, de Forest discovered that heated electrodes located at some distance from each other could serve as a detector. He was convinced of this by an experiment in which two electrodes were placed in the flame of a Bunsen burner. An antenna was connected to one electrode, and ground to the other and, parallel to the electrodes, a battery with headphones. When the antenna received radio waves in the phones, a distinct signal appeared. In such an unusual circuit, heated electrodes and a battery acted as a detector and amplifier.
      Surprisingly, this device allowed to receive radio signals from a ship located in a bay near New York. Of course, the design of the device was still very far from perfect - the inventor himself understood this. “It was obvious that a device with a gas flame was unacceptable for a ship’s radio station,” he wrote in his diary, “so I began to look for a way to heat the gas directly with electric current.”
      Soon, Lee de Forest found that there was no need to heat two electrodes, it was enough to do this with one and keep the other cold. After that, he modified the device by placing the entire structure in a sealed glass container from which air was pumped out.
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 4 December 2018 08: 56
        0
        I read about de Forest as a child, he seems to have not only invented the kenotron, but also the triode.
      2. Avior
        Avior 4 December 2018 09: 47
        0
        In such an unusual circuit, heated electrodes and a battery acted as a detector and amplifier.

        I could perform the functions of an amplifier.
        detector functions — only if the electrodes are placed as in the figure — one in the hot portion of the flame, one in the cold.
        Only this prototype is not a vacuum, but a gas-discharge device, a completely different principle of the robot-conductor was the ionized gas of the flame of the burner. In a vacuum, an electron flows from a heated cathode.
        Different things.
        1. region58
          region58 4 December 2018 12: 34
          +1
          Quote: Avior
          the prototype of not a vacuum, but a gas discharge device

          If you are talking about terminology, then the radio tubes were not only vacuum ones. The same GG-1.
          But I’m not talking about what to call, but how it all began, and about unexpected decisions in those days.
          1. Avior
            Avior 4 December 2018 17: 31
            -1
            by placing the entire structure in a sealed glass container from which air was evacuated.

            it's a vacuum lamp
  9. Declarant
    Declarant 4 December 2018 05: 53
    0
    Not a word about the cruiser Magdeburg and cognac Shustov. wink
  10. race
    race 5 December 2018 21: 11
    +1
    Note to the author: Admiral's last name is Rozhdestvensky.
    And Christmas is a poet.
    I should be ashamed of this.
  11. candidate
    candidate 6 December 2018 01: 34
    0
    Alexander Stepanovich Popov not only invented RADIO, but also formulated the main principles of radio communication. The memory of him, his merits as an electrophysicist, is immortalized in the names of educational institutions. Unfortunately, SPSTU "LETI", where he was the First Director, does not bear his name. And the name determines the fate, so it's up to historical justice ...