The place and time of construction of the Voronezh-M radar in Crimea is determined

The Russian Defense Ministry is planning to install a new Voronezh-M radar station on the Crimean peninsula, the Voronezh-M radar warning system, construction will begin next year, Interfax reports, citing a source familiar with the situation.

According to the source of the publication, the decision on the construction site and the start of work has already been made: the station will be built in 2019 on the site of the old Dnepr radar station near Sevastopol. In its capabilities, the new Voronezh-M radar is significantly superior to the old Dnepr radar, which once covered the Middle East region and could “see” the launch of ballistic missiles of various bases at a distance of up to three and a half thousand kilometers. Radar "Voronezh-M" meter range have a range of up to 4200 kilometers

The deployment of the new radar station was previously announced in the Russian military. In 2017, representatives of the Ministry of Defense carried out work to determine the future location of the radar, but stopped at the location of the old Dnepr radar, which, after the collapse of the USSR, withdrew to Ukraine and became unusable as a result of non-use.

The Voronezh-M radar is a Russian early-warning radar intended for detecting and tracking ballistic and cruise missiles and other aerodynamic objects. A feature of Voronezh-type stations is high factory readiness. No more than 18-24 months are allocated for the construction of a turnkey station, in contrast to the old-type stations that are under construction from five to nine years.

Comments

[Orkraider]

There is good news, but there are just great. More horizontal ones will be completed and according to the new ZGRLS, the graphs will be coordinated and will be completely blocked.
Good info, do not stop the development of the Eye ..

[Sergey39]

It is high time! Fifth year already.

[neri73-r]

Quote: Orkraider

There is good news, but there are just great. More horizontal ones will be completed and according to the new ZGRLS, the graphs will be coordinated and will be completely blocked.
Good info, do not stop the development of the Eye ..

So friends can attack only from the air, there is no will on foot, you don’t want to die!

[Orkraider]

I agree and disagree. Rather, this: they do not want to advance on land, without complete dominance in the sky and the possibility of suppressing any firebags from the air.
But attacks are impossible without the complete neutralization of the strategic nuclear forces, which is possible only through a covert massive strike by low-flying missile defense, which is just opened by the ZRLS.

Therefore, yes, heaven must be kept.

[Machito]

Eye well complements the work of over-the-horizon radars.

[Comrade Beria]

Quote: Orkraider

Therefore, yes, heaven must be kept.

Severe grief awaits a country that cannot repel an air strike
G.K. Zhukov

[Old bun]

horizontal will be completed

There is information that they are building? Really?

[Orkraider]

There is info

You know, this issue is very closely monitored, and all, I repeat, all the resources on which the detailed information on the Containers was posted (except for the ZGRLS in Mordovia, everything is open on it) is overwritten. You can see for yourself by formulating a query in a search engine: Container Far East. Several articles with links to the construction site and the progress of work are erased.

Therefore, I will answer this way - they really build :)

[Old bun]

Thank you comrade. In my time, almost no one wrote about Doug either, but we were very proud of her. There were a titanic construction! I’m glad that we don’t stop, very happy, yes

[GELEZNII_KAPUT]

Here is a link to 29B6 Container

http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-768.html

[Orkraider]

That's why I wrote

To containers (except ZGRLS in Mordovia, everything is open on it) - are overwritten.

Your link says the same as everywhere else - the Far East :)))
And the construction site has long been empty

[Lara Croft]

Quote: Old bulka

According to the source of the publication, the decision on the construction site and the start of work has already been made: the station will begin to be built in 2019 at the site of the old Dnepr radar station near Sevastopol.

Read the article carefully my young Ukrainian nebrat ....

According to the source of the publication, the decision on the construction site and the start of work has already been made: the station will begin to be built in 2019 at the site of the old Dnepr radar station near Sevastopol.

[Old bun]

my young Ukrainian nebrat.

I am more than your father. And we (I think your father also) disgusted to read such statements, ran around in the mountains and hunted smoking for four, who did not look: Belarusian, Ukrainian or Uzbek.
Ugh, disgusted to read. There was a great country, and now ...

read carefully

My question is related to ZGRLS,

horizontal will be completed

There is information that they are building? Really?

if you don’t know what is at stake, do not fit.

And the question is precisely with the construction of the second and third ZGRLS 29B6. A knowledgeable person understood me, and answered, but you did not deign to understand, immediately they began to hang up a label.
It characterizes you not from a very good side,

[URAL72]

Yes, like Armavir has long blocked the Sevastopol surveillance sector. Rather, from Crimea you need to block the lost Mukachevo station. But if you agree with Iran, then you can block the western part of the Indian Ocean, Pakistan and India, and this is already very bold.

The 0,7mb jpg picture from the android is not loaded. Hi to the admin. My personal overseer (moderator) Nastyukha too. Not indifferent to me, twice banned.

[gaudin]

But if you agree with Iran, you can block the western part of the Indian Ocean

It doesn’t work out, under the contract construction is allowed only on its territory.

[URAL72]

But what about the Volga in Belarus? It was completed already in the 90s. And there are floating platforms. Crimea is not recognized by our partners in the agreement as Russian either. And most importantly, the Americans officially withdrew from the ABM Treaty, and it was also linked to nuclear disarmament treaties. So what did you say about the contract?

[gaudin]

But what about the Volga in Belarus?

It was created in the 1980s and covers more than 200 hectares. Used by RF on rights long term rental

So what did you talk about the contract there?

When Russia officially withdraws from the treaty, it can do whatever it wants.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: URAL72

But if you agree with Iran, then you can block the western part of the Indian Ocean, Pakistan and India, and this is already very bold.

The Iranian Constitution prohibits the presence of foreign WBs on its territory ...

[gaudin]

The Iranian Constitution prohibits the presence of foreign WBs on its territory ...

This did not prevent the deployment of Russian aircraft when they flew to Syria to bomb.

[URAL72]

As a lawyer, I can assure you that any agreement can be circumvented, as well as the constitution. For example, the facility will officially be Iranian, and we will lease equipment and specialists, with "online" data transmission, of course. At the same time, using the data jointly with Iran, you can not pay for rent at all, because the object is Iranian. If we used Gabala, at the same time being an ally of Armenia, then Iran looks like a more reliable partner, and indeed a "brother in misfortune". And our specialists will be a guarantee not to strike the station. I think Iran is more than a tasty offer.

[Lara Croft]

Quote: URAL72

For example object officially will be Iranian, we will provide equipment and specialists for rent, with "online" data transmission of course. At the same time, using the data together with Iran, you can not pay for rent at all, because the object is Iranian.

Will all this be called a foreign WB in Iran? No. Well, we are talking about foreign WB in Iran .....
Holiday greetings...

[Lara Croft]

Quote: gaudin

The Iranian Constitution prohibits the presence of foreign WBs on its territory ...

This did not prevent the deployment of Russian aircraft when they flew to Syria to bomb.

Permanently?

[rocket757]

Controlled SKY !!! Anytime and anywhere! It is very important .... I hope there is no such labeled ram that destroyed almost ready-made and operational air defense facilities!
Yes, I hope it’s not like .... like, I don’t know who we can NORMALLY, without extreme and theft to build an object ???

[stalki]

This is great news. specific byaka to all our "tailors"

[keeper03]

I would even say a tailor!

[Voyager]

Great news!

[Zubr]

Yeah, took up the cover of the south-western direction. With an initiative ..

[The whistle]

OUR Crimea, west like a bone in the throat ...! Many interesting things are placed there.
They wanted it for good, but they didn’t see it ..

[thinker]

Russia will place a radar station in Crimea "Voronezh-SM"
August 15 2017
Replayed, or scribblers that M, that CM monomonously?

[Forestol]

The news is excellent, tell Shoigu that instead of putting the Balaklava Bay under the yachts of the oligarchs, you need to restore the famous object to defend against the strike of submarines and preserve nuclear weapons. And also, finally, to complete in the Crimea the underground headquarters of the Navy, built at 80%

[Orkraider]

instead of putting Balaklava Bay under the yachts of the oligarchs, you need to restore the famous object

It makes no sense. Too small, modern pl will not go there. As a military one, too, a bay is not needed; it is too small.

The decision about Marina is perfect for her. Crimea needs to be developed as a resort paradise, and not just a military base. Everything in moderation should be)))

[lopvlad]

but stopped at the location of the old radar "Dnepr"

Well, if then this place was the most acceptable, then now it is clearly not worse.

[Old26]

Quote: gaudin

But if you agree with Iran, you can block the western part of the Indian Ocean

It doesn’t work out, under the contract construction is allowed only on its territory.

This is under the 1972 ABM Treaty. Given the fact that the Americans withdrew from this treaty in the early 2000s, this position is no longer relevant. But the point is to build a strategic object on foreign territory. Again we step on the same rake as with the radar in Skrund, in Gabala, in Mukachevo ???

Quote: URAL72

But what about the Volga in Belarus? It was completed already in the 90s.

But they started back in the days of the Union. According to the provisions of the contract, the stations were built along the perimeter of the national territory with an orientation outward.

Quote: Forestol

it is necessary to restore the famous object for sludge from the strike of submarines

But modern boats enter there. Is there enough channel width? After all, they were built counting on boats of old projects, such as 641 or 611/613

[gaudin]

Given the fact that the Americans withdrew from this treaty in the early 2000s, this position is no longer relevant

Did Russia officially withdraw from the treaty?

But the point is to build a strategic object on foreign territory.

So no one built them on foreign territory, it was the USSR.

Again we step on the same rake as with the radar in Skrund, in Gabala, in Mukachevo ???

There was nothing to replace them at that time, therefore there was a lease agreement.

[Old26]

Quote: gaudin

Did Russia officially withdraw from the treaty?

The agreement was bilateral. If one of the parties withdrew from the contract, does this impose any restrictions on the other? The answer is no. Even if this party has not officially withdrawn from the Treaty. The construction of the Voronezh radar station in the village of Ust-Kem indicates that the limitations of this treaty are currently not in effect for Russia. At one time, the construction of the Krasnoyarsk radar station was a violation. it did not fit the condition "along the perimeter of its territory", because it was located about 800 km from the border. The current one is still about 100 km further

Quote: gaudin

So no one built them on foreign territory, it was the USSR.

This was in response to a proposal by comrade URAL72 to build a station in Iran. There were problems even with stations in the former Soviet republics that became independent states. What to say about construction in general in another country

Quote: gaudin

There was nothing to replace them at that time, therefore there was a lease agreement.

And no one denies this. But with the exception of the Gabala "Daryal" and "Volga" in Belarus, there were problems with everyone else. What happened to Daryal in Sary-Shagan, what happened to the station in Skrunda, what happened to the Ukrainian ones.
So now we need to build ONLY IN ITS TERRITORY