For the first time, a woman is elected president of Georgia

82
For the first time in modern stories Georgia, the president of the country becomes a woman, if you do not take into account the double performance of duties of President Nino Burjanadze. Salome Zurabishvili was elected the new president of Georgia, who wins the second round of elections, after collecting 99,8% of ballots after processing, about 60% of the votes. In the mentioned 2 round, she competed for the presidency with Grigol Vashadze.

According to the constitution of Georgia, the president has a number of powers, including combining this post with the post of commander in chief. At the same time, the president is a more formal head of state. The main functions of the head of state are performed by the prime minister.



What is known about Salome Zurabishvili?

For the first time, a woman is elected president of Georgia


She was nominated as an independent candidate, however she was supported by the Georgian Dream party, ruling in Georgia.
Zurabishvili was born in 1952 year in Paris in the family of political immigrants. Grandfather Salome Zurabishvili (Ivan Ivanovich) in 1918 was a member of the Georgian government, consisting of representatives of the Mensheviks.

In 1974, Salome Zurabishvili was hired at the French Foreign Ministry, worked at the French Embassy in Italy, and in the Fifth Republic office at the UN. In 2001, she received the position of head of the French National Defense General Secretary for International Affairs.

In Georgia, she was in 2003 year, becoming the French ambassador to this country.

Being in the citizenship of France, she was on the post of the head of the Foreign Ministry of Georgia, where she was appointed by Mikhail Saakashvili. Zurabishvili calls the United States the main partner of Georgia, which cannot be considered surprising - it is unlikely a person with different views would be allowed by Washington to the presidency in this country ...

What are the statements of Salome Zurabishvili regarding Russia?

She has repeatedly stated that with Russia, despite all the difficulties, it is necessary to build a dialogue. At the same time, Zurabishvili emphasized every time that Georgia should move towards the EU and NATO.

Zurabishvili considers the order on the invasion of Georgian troops to South Ossetia as a criminal gamble, adding the following: “But at the same time I am not saying that Russia is not the aggressor.”

Zurabishvili during one of the pre-election rallies:
Why did our then authorities only declared Russia the aggressor three days later? It had to be done immediately. (...) I appeal to residents so-called Abkhazia and South Ossetia: all of you are citizens of Georgia, and you do not need Russian protection. We must unite.


In response, Salome Zurabishvili was named in the RSO "the so-called Georgian. "
  • In 1974, Salome Zurabishvili was hired at the French Foreign Ministry, worked at the French Embassy in Italy, and in the Fifth Republic office at the UN.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

82 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    29 November 2018 08: 25
    "Zurabishvili was born in 1952 in Paris in a family of political emigrants."
    "I ended up in Georgia in 2003, becoming the French ambassador to this country.
    Being in French citizenship, she became the head of the Georgian Foreign Ministry "- this is all you need to know about the new president of Georgia.
    1. +4
      29 November 2018 09: 05
      The new president of Georgia is an employee of the French Foreign Ministry.
      It’s good that he’s not a former US Secretary of Defense.
      It is high time for Georgia to remember that trade routes go not only from East to West, but also from North to South. Then the Georgian people will live much richer.
      And Georgian presidents care about the welfare of the United States, instead of their people.
      1. 0
        29 November 2018 12: 53
        Well, let's call her statements .. restrained and encouraging. She will not spoil the sponsors, and of course the Russian Federation patted Georgia, which can be recognized, well, this is the truth. wassat However, she criticized the attack on South Ossetia in the first place. The appeal to the citizens of the Russian Federation in Ossetia and Abkhazia is, of course, opportunistic. Let's hope for a normalization of relations.
        1. +1
          29 November 2018 13: 54
          In response, Salome Zurabishvili was called a "so-called Georgian" in the Republic of South Ossetia.

          She - Salome Zuraboshvmli - exactly "so-called Georgian" and there is.
          1. 0
            29 November 2018 15: 22
            REFERENCE about Salome Zurabishvili.
            Salome was born and raised in France, but nevertheless knows very well the history of Georgia and our modernity.
            Salome Zurabishvili - a descendant of famous people in Georgia.
            Her maternal grandfather Niko Nikoladze is the founder of the seaport in Poti and the initiator of the construction of the Georgian Railway.
            Grandfather by father Ivane Zurabishvili is a member of the government of the Georgian Democratic Republic that existed in the 1918-1921 years.
            Both of them were associates of the "father of the Georgian nation" Ilya Chavchavadze.
            Her elderly мать during the Rose Revolution in November last year, she was in Tbilisi and "actively supported the demonstrators." Indeed, according to Saakashvili, "Shevardnadze's regime was for her the personification of the Bolshevik regime." The one who forced the Zurabishvili family to leave their homeland in 1921 together with the Menshevik government of the country.

            Cousin Salome Zuraboschvili - President of the French Academy of Sciences Helene Carrer-d'Ancausse.

            Education. Salome Zurabishvili is a graduate of the Paris Institute of Political Science and Columbia University in New York. The same one that Mikheil Saakashvili finished.

            Salome Zurabishvili was married twice.
            First husband before the divorce Koki Gorjestani (Gugushvili) grew up in Iran.
            The second husband of Salome Zurabishvili was one of the most famous Georgian dissidents of the Soviet era, Genri Kashia, who from the 80 years lived and worked in the West in the editions of Radio Liberty and Voice of America. In the 2012 year, Genry Kashia died at the age of 72 years
            NOTICEthat the second husband of Salome - Zhanri Kashia - was related to the allegedly deceased - not killed - Georgian Jew businessman Badri Patarkatsishvili, who was wanted by the Russian Prosecutor General's Office. Zhanri Kashia hosted a talk show on the Imedi TV channel, owned by Badri Patarkatsishvili.
            What was Badri Patarkatsishvili like? See video below.

            Prior to being appointed Ambassador to Tbilisi Zurabishvili worked in French diplomatic missions in Italy, the USA, with NATO and the European Union.
            French Foreign Minister de Villepin is not just her former boss, but also close friend.
            See in detail - https://iz.ru/news/287865

            Badri Patarkatsishvili. Wild money. Posted: 13 Sep 2016
            1. 0
              29 November 2018 16: 19
              Yeah, not Stalin. wink

              Grandfather Salome Zurabishvili (Ivan Ivanovich) wassat laughing lol laughing
    2. +19
      29 November 2018 09: 15
      On the course at the institute we had a Georgian. I think a lot about myself thinking and completely out of business. That's how I heard such a phrase from her - we are the Georgians of the Transcaucasian French! I told her then that if the French called themselves European Georgians it would be yes! And so ... She was very offended at me then, which didn’t upset me at all. Now I read an article and I remembered that situation. Probably this is such an intimate Georgian dream ... Although apparently not everyone - the Transcaucasian French live in Georgia ... laughing
      1. +3
        29 November 2018 13: 42
        Armenians say the same thing. In this case, they usually call 500 thousand Armenians living there and recall Charles Aznavour. laughing All of them are oiled in one world. Freeloaders. Closer place to the European feeder knocked out.
        Quote: Detective
        we are the Georgians of the Transcaucasian French!
        1. +6
          29 November 2018 13: 49
          Quote: vladimirvn
          Armenians say the same thing.

          Yes? Seriously? Please tell me ... In this case, the French themselves are more and more and more Arabs!
        2. 0
          29 November 2018 20: 55

          Armenians say the same thing.

          Is it impossible without Armenians? After honoring Charles Aznavour, France became even closer to Armenia. Although earlier there were friendly relations both in word and in deed.
          On the topic, I wish the Georgians prosperity and true independence so that there are no thoughts to betray the millennial neighbors for momentary benefits.
      2. 0
        29 November 2018 21: 33
        These "Transcaucasian French" live in a bum, into which they turned a once flourishing country.
        And completely sold out to the west.
    3. 0
      29 November 2018 09: 40
      Quote: dr.star75
      that’s all you need to know about the new president of Georgia.

      I would also like to know about her family (with whom she sleeps, with whom she lives, etc.) .... although your information about her is more than enough))
      1. jjj
        +4
        29 November 2018 11: 01
        Yes, people in the post-Soviet space crushed once that they have to import presidents from abroad
  2. +21
    29 November 2018 08: 27
    Wonders. In Georgia, Georgians ended.
    1. +14
      29 November 2018 09: 00
      Could you not fool around - they recognized the American ambassador as president and that’s all, and the elections need not be held.
    2. -7
      29 November 2018 09: 05
      And in Moscow Muscovites ended. One Sobyanin remained.
      1. 0
        29 November 2018 09: 09
        Quote: Bearded

        And in Moscow Muscovites ended. One Sobyanin remained.

        Sobyanin is a citizen of the Russian Federation. It's enough.
        1. -1
          29 November 2018 10: 01
          Ask young Muscovites on stilettos what they will answer you about Sobyaninsky tiles?
          They will answer you that walking around the city in high heels is dangerous: you can break your legs.
          1. +1
            29 November 2018 10: 49
            Quote: Bearded
            What will they answer about the Sobyaninsky tiles?

            Take care of sidewalks - walk on lawns (s).

            Stilettos yeah laughing
          2. +3
            29 November 2018 11: 05
            Let the hairpin be worn where possible .. smile
            They didn’t have enough polished sidewalks and seams to close up .. laughing I would like to see them when they would come out on a heel in Kaliningrad or Chernyakhovsk for paving stones ... =))))
      2. +4
        29 November 2018 09: 13
        Quote: Bearded
        And in Moscow Muscovites ended. One Sobyanin remained.

        Do you miss Luzhkov?
        1. 0
          29 November 2018 09: 59
          Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
          Quote: Bearded
          And in Moscow Muscovites ended. One Sobyanin remained.

          Do you miss Luzhkov?

          And you Muscovites ask who they missed?
          Muscovites are missing the mayor of Muscovite !!!
          Is there really not a single native living in the 10 millionth city worthy to lead the city?
          1. +2
            29 November 2018 11: 09
            Why didn’t Sobyanin please you? In my opinion, he copes with his duties perfectly. And in your words, Moscow, this is a state of separate bribes.
          2. +2
            29 November 2018 11: 09
            Quote: Bearded
            Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
            Quote: Bearded
            And in Moscow Muscovites ended. One Sobyanin remained.

            Do you miss Luzhkov?

            And you Muscovites ask who they missed?
            Muscovites are missing the mayor of Muscovite !!!
            Is there really not a single native living in the 10 millionth city worthy to lead the city?

            My friends Muscovites Sobyanin called reindeer herder laughing , no offense to the inhabitants of the far north. wassat
            1. +1
              29 November 2018 13: 45
              Quote: Sleeping
              My friends Muscovites Sobyanin called reindeer herder

              Tell me who your friend is and I’ll tell you who you are))) They don’t have much culture.
            2. +2
              29 November 2018 13: 54
              Quote: Sleeping
              My friends Muscovites Sobyanin called reindeer herder

              Even if he was from distant Chukotka. The main thing is that our man is directed in the right direction, but works not on the periphery, but in the capital. Because qualification, apparently, allows, well, we know "whose shoe". But to take foreigners as leaders of the country (even if their old-time emigrants who served in the administrations of third-party states - this, call me, inspires acute suspicion.
              1. 0
                29 November 2018 16: 25
                Quote: Lycan
                who served in the administrations of third-party state-in-this, please


                Brilev (native Muscovite wink ) will say that this is normal good laughing
                The main thing is to pay taxes laughing
                1. 0
                  29 November 2018 16: 45
                  And he does not work in the public sector wink - he, in addition to citizenship, has (oh horror) foreign real estate. If he gets rid of everything - then we can look at his dossier and think about the state ... And in the meantime - let him broadcast to us about all sorts of interesting things from the "emitter".
                  With regard to holding a position in the public sector, each case must be considered separately and very carefully. Here Humpbacked - looked completely our man, progressive. Someone overlooked something - here you are restructuring with the collapse + pouring mud on past achievements.
          3. +2
            29 November 2018 13: 28
            Quote: Bearded
            Muscovites are missing the mayor of Muscovite !!!

            Yes, we generally care about the lamp. If only the city was in its normal form. I’m telling you this as a Muscovite.
            1. +2
              29 November 2018 16: 28
              And we are up to the fonor. the main thing is that there would be no war. good
              Well, with the coups you tie there in Moscow. Tea is not alone in the country you live.
              You freak out with fat there, and as a result of this devilry, the USSR fell apart laughing
              1. 0
                29 November 2018 17: 17
                Quote: For example
                You freak out with fat there, and as a result of this devilry, the USSR fell apart

                We are not in the business, you are the members of the Politburo to present.
  3. +5
    29 November 2018 08: 31
    I wonder where it will lead ... From Tbilisi or Paris ...
    1. +18
      29 November 2018 08: 38
      They will lead it. From Washington.
    2. +3
      29 November 2018 08: 41
      from Fashington she will be led))
      1. RL
        -4
        29 November 2018 11: 12
        Would you like to lead from Moscow?
        1. +3
          29 November 2018 11: 37
          Of course. Georgia is ours.
    3. +2
      29 November 2018 09: 25
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      I wonder where it will lead ... From Tbilisi or Paris.

      Well so everything is clear, this is what it is worth:
      Zurabishvili considers the order on the invasion of Georgian troops to South Ossetia as a criminal gamble, adding the following: “But at the same time I am not saying that Russia is not the aggressor.”
      Georgia invaded, and Russia the aggressor. "The wolf sobbed with pity for the ram - if I hadn't butted, I would have become your best friend, and we would be together at the same table, over a glass of tea, I would bring you herbs, smoke, and then dine."
      1. RL
        -8
        29 November 2018 11: 26
        If I understand correctly, under international treaties, the Republic of South Ossetia was an autonomous republic within Georgia. And only Georgia had the right to defend its constitutional order on its territory. So the entry of Russian troops into South Ossetia is an act of occupation by a foreign state. As for peacekeepers, peacekeeping is carried out on the basis of the UN Charter, and not on the desire of any individual from the KGB-Bolshevik milieu and his personal concepts. This leader will not become the new Peter Petrvym
        1. +6
          29 November 2018 11: 41
          Quote: RL
          under international treaties

          So: the South Ossetian Republic declared its independence back in 1990, this is enough and this does not contradict international treaties, in particular the Helsinki agreements. Further, the UN peacekeepers represented by a certain number of Russian units stood on the demarcation line, so they were attacked - this is the first and second - since there is a demarcation line agreed upon in the UN, Georgia had no right to (international) violate it, because based on this right, this line and these units were established.
          1. -5
            29 November 2018 11: 52
            Quote: Jura
            So: the South Ossetian Republic declared its independence back in the 1990 year, this is enough and this does not contradict international treaties, in particular the Helsinki agreements.

            And the proclamation of the independence of the Republic of Ichkeria "does not contradict international treaties, in particular the Helsinki agreements"?

            Quote: Jura
            Further, UN peacekeepers represented by a certain number of Russian units stood on the demarcation line, and here they were attacked - this is the first, and the second - since there is a demarcation line agreed upon at the UN, Georgia had no right to (international) violate it, because based on this right, this line and these units were established.

            UN peacekeepers represented by a certain number of Russian units? Yah? And did they have a mandate? wink

            PS
            Congratulations to the Georgian people on their new president. love
            1. +5
              29 November 2018 12: 17
              Quote: professor
              And the proclamation of the independence of the Republic of Ichkeria "does not contradict international treaties, in particular the Helsinki agreements"?

              Are we talking about Russia? Do you want to talk? Ask Kadyrov about Ichkeria, he will explain everything on his fingers first hand, who, what and why. Does the case have anything to say? Judging by your post there is nothing, so I didn’t jerk anything and was not mistaken?
              1. -4
                29 November 2018 12: 38
                Quote: Jura
                Are we talking about Russia? Do you want to talk? Ask Kadyrov about Ichkeria, he will explain everything on his fingers first-hand, who, what and why

                I did not know that international standards depend on Kadyrov. By the way, Ahmed or Ramzan?

                Quote: Jura
                Does the case have anything to say? Judging by your post there is nothing, so I didn’t jerk anything and was not mistaken?

                In the case, I have already said. Russian troops were not peacekeepers at the start of the Russo-Georgian war. They did not have a peacekeeping mandate. in general, and even the UN and even more so. This is the time.

                The right of a nation to self-determination conflicts with the inviolability of state borders. These are two.

                Russia recognized the "independence" of the Georgian autonomies after deploying its troops there against the will of the legitimate government. These are three.
                1. +3
                  29 November 2018 14: 14
                  Quote: professor
                  I did not know that international standards depend on Kadyrov. By the way, Ahmed or Ramzan?

                  You want to say that you don’t know which one you can ask, and who you don’t already ask.
                  Quote: professor
                  Russian troops were not peacekeepers at the start of the Russo-Georgian war. They did not have a peacekeeping mandate at all, and even UN and even more so. This time.

                  In South Ossetia, from the very beginning, the actions of Russian military and diplomats took place on the basis of a bilateral Russia-Georgia interstate agreement in the presence of the OSCE observation mission (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe). The Georgian-South Ossetian conflict finally got out of control in June 1992. There was a real threat of the destruction of Tskhinvali and the death of its inhabitants. At this point, the Russian leadership issued ultimatum demands to stop attempts to resolve the conflict by military means. As a result, Georgia, South Ossetia, Russia held negotiations and an agreement was signed on June 24, 1992 on the principles for resolving the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict.
                  According to the Agreement, a zone of separation was created, from which both conflicting parties pledged to withdraw troops. A special settlement body was created - the Joint Control Commission (CCM) from the “parties involved in the conflict”, to which Russia was also included. The tasks of the JCC were to control the ceasefire, to withdraw the armed formations from the contact zone, to ensure a security regime in this zone, and to dissolve the armed formations. The commission was given mixed groups of military observers and peace and law enforcement forces. Tripartite patrols, which included Russian, Ossetian and Georgian military, were supposed to patrol the South Ossetian territory in the area where the conflicting sides come into contact.
                  It is significant that, along with the Georgian and Russian representatives, the Agreement was signed by the authorities of South Ossetia, which gives the Agreement not only interstate, but also a mixed character. In fact, the Agreement regulated the internal Georgian conflict, however, it was simultaneously a legal (interstate) document, on the basis of which the Russian military was present. Peacekeeping contingents comprised one battalion, Georgian, Ossetian and Russian, about 500 people on each side. So - this is contrary to the UN Charter, all within the legal framework. I did not say anything about the mandate in this case, the peacekeeping mission is fixed by the signatures of all interested parties. Its presence would be nice too, but the agreement is self-sufficient from the point of view of international law.
                  Quote: professor
                  The right of a nation to self-determination conflicts with the inviolability of state borders.
                  So when I said that South Ossetia declared independence from Georgia in 1990, this played a role, because at that time both Georgia and South Ossetia were part of the USSR, Georgia declared its independence on April 9 1991 year. Professor, in connection with such a formulation of the question, you can tell, at least for example, how Israel founded a state and existed de facto for several decades (for which it did not need any international treaties, international legal field) before its approval at the UN. Now you will tell that the UN at that time did not yet exist, that there was no legal field either, there were no treaties, therefore "we have the right." In principle, I have nothing against the nation having its own state, including the Jews.
                  1. -3
                    29 November 2018 15: 16
                    Quote: Jura
                    You want to say that you don’t know which one you can ask, and who you don’t already ask.

                    I want to say that for me, that Kadyrov and Maskhadov are not experts in international relations.

                    Quote: Jura
                    So - this is contrary to the UN Charter, all within the legal framework.

                    Yes, it contradicts. We found that on the demarcation line NOT there were UN peacekeepers represented by a number of Russian units, from the word "absolutely". The Russian military were on the territory of Georgia with its consent under the auspices of the OSCE, but Georgia officially demanded the Russian military to leave the territory of Georgia and did not renew the mandate. Thus, the Russian troops on the territory of Georgia were not any peacekeepers and were there ILLEGAL.

                    Quote: Jura
                    I did not say anything about the mandate in this case, the peacekeeping mission is fixed by the signatures of all interested parties. Its presence would be nice too, but the agreement is self-sufficient from the point of view of international law.

                    No, not self-sufficient. Georgia NOT extended this agreement, and therefore the presence of Russian troops in Georgia lost its legitimacy.

                    Quote: Jura
                    So when I said that South Ossetia declared independence from Georgia in the 1990 year, this played a role, because at that time both Georgia and South Ossetia, respectively, were part of the USSR, Georgia proclaimed its independence on April 9 1991 of the year.

                    No. Ossetia was not part of the USSR, but was part of the Georgian SSR. Russia recognized the "independence" of Ossetia only many years later and after it cleared the territory of Ossetia from the Georgian troops.

                    Quote: Jura
                    Professor, in connection with such a formulation of the question, you can tell, at least for example, how Israel founded a state and existed de facto for several decades (for which it did not need any international treaties, international legal field) before its approval at the UN. Now you will tell that the UN at that time did not yet exist, that there was no legal field either, there were no treaties, so we have the right. In principle, I have nothing against the nation having its own state, including the Jews.

                    Israel de facto existed in accordance with international standards of the time. Legally, the territory was under the mandate of Britain. The mandate given to her by the League of Nations for the creation of Israel. Nobody gave Russia a mandate to create other state entities in Georgia.

                    This is the materiel. hi
                    1. 0
                      29 November 2018 16: 04
                      [quote = professor] Yes, it contradicts. [/ quote]
                      Your statement is unfounded. Not contrary, professor.[quote = professor] The Russian military was on the territory of Georgia with its consent under the auspices of the OSCE, but Georgia officially demanded that the Russian military leave the territory of Georgia and did not extend the mandate. Thus, Russian troops on the territory of Georgia were not any peacekeepers and were UNLAWFUL there.
                      [/ Quote]
                      Legally, professor, Russia was legally in South Ossetia; in March 2006, Russian-Georgian agreements were signed in Sochi on the withdrawal of Russian bases stationed in Georgia until the end of 2008. In 2007, President Saakashvili demanded the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgia. The largest base was Akhalkalaki. The troops were withdrawn ahead of schedule on November 15, 2007, although a withdrawal was planned for 2008. There were only Russian peacekeepers operating under the CIS mandate in Abkhazia and under the Dagomys agreements in South Ossetia. That is, these agreements besides Georgia were also signed by South Ossetia, and here Saakashvili’s Wishlist alone is not enough if South Ossetia, in appendage to Georgia, would ask Russia to do the same and fulfill these requirements. [quote = РїСЂРѕС „ессор]
                      [quote = professor] of Russia, no one gave a mandate to create other state authorities in Georgia [/ quote]
                      Again an unfounded statement, Russia did not need a mandate for this because it did not create states on the territory of Georgia, just as what the Ossetians themselves wanted and did so themselves. [quote = professor] Israel de facto existed in accordance with international standards of the time. Legally, the territory was under the mandate of Britain. The mandate issued to her by the League of Nations for the creation of Israel. [/ Quote]
                      This is what you had in mind: after the proclamation of the state of Israel on May 15, 1948, the army of Abdullah committed an international crime - crossed the Jordan River and occupied the territories of Judea and Samaria, captured East Jerusalem. Jordanian rights to these territories were recognized only by the governments of Great Britain and Pakistan. Great Britain bears full responsibility for this crime, since the basis of the armed forces of Transjordan (Jordan) was the British Legion formed by the British, commanded by English officers, led by General John Glabb. It is not necessary to think that Emir Abdullah could act against the will of Great Britain - a huge Jordanian deficit The budget was largely covered by British "financial assistance." Those. Great Britain not only created the military forces of aggression, but also financed the aggression and annexation of the territory of the state of Israel, which was under its guarantees. Great Britain could not prevent the reconstruction of Israel. But as a result of UK action, restored in 1948, the State of Israel received an extremely small part of the territory of Ottoman Palestine, and immediately became a victim of aggression by Islamic countries that were dependent on Britain, who launched an unprovoked war against Israel, i.e. committed an act of aggression, with the hidden support of the UK
                      I think England at heart hopes for your thanks, well, because it's England.
                      1. -2
                        29 November 2018 16: 33
                        Quote: Jura
                        Your statement is unfounded. Not contrary, professor.

                        Just the UN agrees on this issue with me, and not with you. Who recognized Ossetia there? wink

                        Quote: Jura
                        Legally, professor, Russia was legally in South Ossetia, in March 2006 in Sochi, Russian-Georgian agreements were signed on the withdrawal of Russian bases stationed in Georgia until the end of 2008. In 2007, President Saakashvili demanded the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgia.

                        Let's simplify this argument. Did the Russian "peacekeepers" have a mandate in August 2008? The answer is no.
                        Tbilisi extended the status of Russian troops? Not.

                        Hence the conclusion with which, according to most of the UN member countries, Russian troops were illegal in Georgia.

                        Quote: Jura
                        This is what you had in mind: after the proclamation of 15 on May 1948 of the state of Israel ...

                        Israel has nothing to do with aggression against Georgia. Israel has been recognized by most UN member countries. Russian troops are on the territory of Georgia contrary to the decision of most countries members of the UN. This is elementary. hi
                      2. 0
                        29 November 2018 17: 00
                        Quote: professor
                        Let's simplify this argument. Did the Russian "peacekeepers" have a mandate in August 2008? The answer is no.
                        in August 2008, Russian troops were legally located, the 2006 agreement of the year Georgia - Russia. And something else?
                        Quote: professor
                        Israel has nothing to do with aggression against Georgia.

                        Of course it doesn’t, but the aggression of Georgia against South Ossetia? Yes, of course, it doesn’t have what I mean.
                        Quote: professor
                        Russian troops are on the territory of Georgia
                        Yes, there are no Russian troops. In Georgia, as soon as the ties ran out, the troops immediately left and left a small contingent in South Ossetia, at the request of this small but proud and independent country.
                      3. -1
                        29 November 2018 17: 15
                        Quote: Jura
                        in August 2008, Russian troops were legally located, the 2006 agreement of the year Georgia - Russia. And something else?

                        Once again and as a last resort. the agreement is not unlimited and requires extension, but it was not extended. Georgia refused to renew. Thus, there was no agreement on August 2008.

                        Quote: Jura
                        Of course it doesn’t, but the aggression of Georgia against South Ossetia? Yes, of course, it doesn’t have what I mean.

                        1. Establishing a constitutional order on its territory is the sovereign right of every country. For example, Russia in Chechnya or Georgia in South Ossetia.
                        2. Israel has nothing to do with this conflict.

                        Quote: Jura
                        Yes, there are no Russian troops. In Georgia, as soon as the ties ran out, the troops immediately left and left a small contingent in South Ossetia, at the request of this small but proud and independent country.

                        1. There is no such "independent" country in South Ossetia. There is George, a member of the UN.
                        2. On the territory of Georgia, Russian troops are illegally located. This fact is recognized by the international community. For example, the OSCE and the UN.

                        All the best to you. hi
                      4. 0
                        29 November 2018 17: 59
                        People, nations, states, all deserve what they came to this world with, but no more.
                        Quote: professor
                        All the best to you.

                        You too. hi Maybe one day the day will come and there will only be people on earth who are neighbors to each other, without borders, without bandits, thieves and murderers, without bombs, without wars. Once, but not now, then we will not be there.
  4. +4
    29 November 2018 08: 33
    Again the war with rodents?
    Now we’ll definitely fight back on two fronts !!! Khokhlyatsky and rodent !!!
  5. +7
    29 November 2018 08: 35
    In fact, the American six.
    1. +4
      29 November 2018 09: 23
      - Am Won.
      - What?
      - American stinker!
      lol
    2. RL
      -3
      29 November 2018 11: 30
      And Sergei Brilev, whose citizen and how everyone listens to him.
      1. +2
        29 November 2018 13: 46
        Is that all? No, really, do a survey, who really watches the news on TV? How often? How often do they watch issues with Brilev?
  6. +8
    29 November 2018 08: 37
    As the tiger answered the lion in the circus to the question about the new trainer:
    "We'll chew, we'll see ...")))
  7. +5
    29 November 2018 08: 37
    Being in the citizenship of France, she was on the post of head of the Georgian Foreign Ministry ..
    The Georgian land has become scarce with its talents; everyone continues to focus on newcomers. They live, therefore, frankly, to a light bulb, who will become president there, because from this, relations with Russia will not improve.
  8. +4
    29 November 2018 08: 40
    As if another mushroom - chickpea did not appear. We will see.
    By the way, why does the tie-eater boil over there, who knows?
    1. +5
      29 November 2018 08: 44
      We'll wait and see, but it looks like it is controllable from the outside.
    2. +4
      29 November 2018 08: 45
      Quote: rocket757
      As if another mushroom - chickpea did not appear. We will see.
      By the way, why does the tie-eater boil over there, who knows?

      I took the dose. Resting.
    3. +2
      29 November 2018 08: 47
      While in French citizenship, she was on the post of head of the Georgian Foreign Ministry, where she was appointed by Mikhail Saakashvili. What do you think? What is he boiling or not boiling .. he hopes to return? Will we make bets?
      1. 0
        29 November 2018 09: 22
        Quote: spec.78
        Will we make bets?

        BOOM!!!
        I already have a tricorne hat .... sho from a "valuable" to lay? I put my CONDOR spinning rod .... old but very fighting!
        In short, no one needs Mishiko there! And without him there is someone to steer! Will not let!
      2. RL
        -4
        29 November 2018 11: 35
        Charles Aznavour was a Frenchman, from an Armenian family, helped with money and the influence of Armenia. But not in the Soviet horse feed.
  9. +2
    29 November 2018 08: 45
    Zurabishvili considers the order on the invasion of Georgian troops to South Ossetia as a criminal gamble, adding the following: “But at the same time I am not saying that Russia is not the aggressor.”

    ... both yours and ours ... semi-pregnant ... bully
  10. +7
    29 November 2018 08: 50
    About a month ago, I was traveling home from a guest in a taxi. The taxi driver turned out to be Georgian. They remembered together how they lived in a union. He asks .. But you can’t go back to get together? Replied. Will not work. You have already grown up a generation that does not know the Russian language and does not like us. Here such a story happened.
    1. +2
      29 November 2018 09: 19
      Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
      That such a story happened.

      And thank God! Enough and so fed 70 years .. Themselves .. All by yourself ..
      1. +1
        29 November 2018 09: 21
        Quote: max702
        Quote: Andrey Chistyakov
        That such a story happened.

        And thank God! Enough and so fed 70 years .. Themselves .. All by yourself ..

        Eka You are fast. Hitler defeated the Union !!!!!
      2. 0
        29 November 2018 10: 03
        In this logic, only oil-producing regions need to be left. The rest is enough to feed.
        1. +1
          29 November 2018 11: 47
          Quote: Servisinzhener
          In this logic, only oil-producing regions need to be left. The rest is enough to feed.

          Somehow, the inhabitants of the oil-producing regions didn’t do the massacre and genocide of the inhabitants of the oil-producing regions .. But the rodents succeeded in this until they took them off, although we still feed them by opening the market for the Borjomi and Georgian wines after the murders of our citizens and peacekeepers ..
          1. 0
            30 November 2018 09: 18
            The massacre and genocide is not a property of this region, but the result of the current political situation and the weakness of the central government. Look at Ukraine what kind of cuts occur, despite the fact that the people are the same on both sides.
  11. +1
    29 November 2018 09: 04
    figure is not completely independent
    1. +1
      29 November 2018 09: 37
      Yeah! )) Fu you, well you, legs are bent!
      One is towards America, and the other is towards the European Union. And Georgia - you yourself understand in what place.
  12. +1
    29 November 2018 09: 10
    funny, in the political elite of Georgia, it turned out to be an accident, go and French citizenship also left ...
  13. +5
    29 November 2018 09: 23
    Here it is appropriate to use the phrase "was appointed by the President of Georgia."
    A man who until 2003 knew nothing about Georgia became the president of Georgia ...
  14. +2
    29 November 2018 09: 50
    In general, one should not expect a change in the foreign policy of Georgia. Tbilisi will not soon return to the circle of partners of Moscow.
  15. +1
    29 November 2018 11: 05
    Quote: Servisinzhener
    In this logic, only oil-producing regions need to be left. The rest is enough to feed.

    What about Moscow? There are only managers, because they themselves will not survive ... crying
  16. 0
    29 November 2018 11: 15
    Yes, something is wrong in the Georgian kingdom, since the presidents have political emigrants. Well, I'm more interested in further relations between Russia and Georgia. If there are no complications, then this is already good.
  17. +1
    29 November 2018 11: 43
    It’s interesting whether they will soon have a president who was born in Georgia, studied in Georgia, worked in Georgia and will remain in Georgia after his presidency.
  18. +2
    29 November 2018 11: 54
    This situevina reminded me of one event: at the VAZ, when an effective artyakov was "driving" there, there was one "consultant on advertising and promoting" priors "to the market" from a maskwabad with a salary of about 0,5 Lyam ... so, after a year and a half "intensive work to promote" this organism was pinned onto the conveyor belt, where Kalina was collected And so carelessly: is it a "Prior"? ... did not know whether to cry or laugh.
    1. 0
      29 November 2018 12: 26
      hi
      They don’t smell the earth beneath ...
  19. 0
    29 November 2018 12: 58
    Something is strange like that, it’s not humanly all this. Neither do you have the Ministry of Emergency Situations with evacuation from the Central Election Commission, or witchcraft with interest one hour before the closure of the sites, and where is the tritium round with the removal of the winner in the first? It seems Orthodox, but they behave like unchristians. )))
  20. 0
    29 November 2018 19: 15
    I thought that only in Ukraine ministers from the USA, Poland, Georgia, etc. were brought. And then a whole president was brought from France. Who will call them smart after that?
  21. 0
    29 November 2018 19: 57
    According to the track record, it’s like Mishiko. That is also a cosmic creator)
    Apparently in Georgia they believe that all local Georgians are infected with a scoop and only the descendants of emigrants who fled from the Bolsheviks were able to maintain true Georgianism.
    By the same principle, Lithuania and Latvia elected their presidents in the late 1990s.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"