Military Review

Only 5 percent of Japanese agree to “receive” 2 islands from Russia

105
In Japan, a survey was conducted in which local residents were asked to express their opinion on the possible signing of a peace treaty with Russia. The survey, as reported by the media of the Land of the Rising Sun, was conducted by telephone using random sampling. In total, the survey organizers learned the opinion of thousands of Japanese 2,2.


Only 5 percent of Japanese agree to “receive” 2 islands from Russia


It turned out that the signing of a peace treaty with Russia in the transfer of two islands (Shikotan and Habomai) under the jurisdiction of Tokyo is supported by only 5% of the respondents. Significantly more (33%) spoke in favor of the “necessity of the requirement” of the 4 of the Southern Kuriles, which in Japan continue to be called the Northern Territories.

46% of respondents said they are ready to support the signing of a peace treaty under the following conditions: Russia transfers two islands to Japan first and two more islands (Iturup and Kunashir) after some time.

21% of respondents said that they are categorically against agreements with Russia to continue negotiations, the outcome of which could be a peace treaty. About 67% of Japanese respondents noted that such agreements reached between Shinzo Abe and Vladimir Putin support.

It is noteworthy that the option “Signing a peace treaty without preliminary conditions” was not presented in the survey. It should be recalled that the official position of Tokyo at the moment is as follows: the transfer from Russia of the four islands of the South Kuriles in exchange for a signature on a piece of paper under the heading "Peace Treaty" and a promise not to deploy American military bases in the Kurils. Such an “exchange” looks, to put it mildly, unequal.
Photos used:
Kremlin site
105 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 26 November 2018 10: 55
    +11
    The remaining 95% do not want anything. What can Hitler's allies want? 100 years of execution.
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 26 November 2018 11: 02
      +33
      Quote: Tank jacket
      The remaining 95% do not want anything. What can Hitler's allies want? 100 years of execution.

      It would be better to conduct a survey with us, how many Russian citizens are ready to give even two islands of Japan .. Wishlists of the Japanese are not at all interested in them finger in mouth put a hand to bite ..
      1. Machito
        Machito 26 November 2018 11: 09
        +4
        Vladimir, let's do the survey ourselves.

        Who believes that Russia should not transfer islands to Japan?

        Vote.
        We put the pros and cons.
        1. Consultant
          Consultant 26 November 2018 11: 15
          +5
          Quote: Bearded
          Vote. We put the pros and cons

          I think that it should not. Put a minus laughing
          1. Orca
            Orca 26 November 2018 12: 30
            0
            Giving yourself a price? winked
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 26 November 2018 14: 17
              +3
              No FIG at all was Russia to enter into negotiations with the Japanese on the Kuril Islands on some conditions there!
              Correctly say that the Japanese appetite will increase with food!

              Let the Japanese at first repent of their war crimes, and then, maybe, we'll talk about something abstract with them and talk!
        2. Svarog
          Svarog 26 November 2018 11: 25
          0
          Quote: Bearded
          Vladimir, let's do the survey ourselves.

          Who believes that Russia should not transfer islands to Japan?

          Vote.
          We put the pros and cons.

          Cool idea .. before the elections, I also conducted a survey of who is for Grudinin and who is for Putin .. Putin then lost according to the results, by voting in the VO, but my rating increased laughing Plus to you, I think that we should not transmit anything to the Japanese at all ..
          1. Sandor Clegane
            Sandor Clegane 26 November 2018 13: 56
            +1
            Quote: Svarog
            Plus to you, I think that we should not transmit anything to the Japanese at all.

            so + is to transfer to yap, but minus is not to give anything !!! read how he built the phrase !!!
          2. Machito
            Machito 26 November 2018 21: 20
            0
            Quote: Svarog
            Quote: Bearded
            Vladimir, let's do the survey ourselves.

            Who believes that Russia should not transfer islands to Japan?

            Vote.
            We put the pros and cons.

            Cool idea .. before the elections, I also conducted a survey of who is for Grudinin and who is for Putin .. Putin then lost according to the results, by voting in the VO, but my rating increased laughing Plus to you, I think that we should not transmit anything to the Japanese at all ..

            I agree with you.
            yes
        3. Svarog
          Svarog 26 November 2018 11: 32
          0
          Quote: Bearded
          Vladimir, let's do the survey ourselves.

          Who believes that Russia should not transfer islands to Japan?

          Vote.
          We put the pros and cons.

          You need to formulate the voting conditions in a more specific way, otherwise Jack Golovan (aka Consultant) will have all the votes laughing and it would be nice if the voters would explain why PRO / CON ..
          1. Orca
            Orca 26 November 2018 12: 36
            -3
            That's right - it was necessary ... it was, But in my opinion, it should be clear to an adequate person - who is for the proposal, then plus; who is against, that "stick in the wheels" inserts. So somehow I think. ...or?
            Threat. You excuse me if I rarely come up here. ;)
          2. Machito
            Machito 26 November 2018 21: 23
            0
            Quote: Svarog
            Quote: Bearded
            Vladimir, let's do the survey ourselves.

            Who believes that Russia should not transfer islands to Japan?

            Vote.
            We put the pros and cons.

            You need to formulate the voting conditions in a more specific way, otherwise Jack Golovan (aka Consultant) will have all the votes laughing and it would be nice if the voters would explain why PRO / CON ..


            I agree with you. The question is not correctly formulated. We must start: "we put plus who for ....."
        4. vic02
          vic02 26 November 2018 13: 10
          +4
          According to the peace treaty with Japan of 8.09.1951/2/5, signed by the Japanese, Article 1905 c) "Japan renounces all rights, titles and claims to the Kuril Islands and part of Sakhalin and adjacent islands, over which Japan acquired sovereignty as a result of the Portsmouth Treaty of XNUMX September XNUMX. "
          According to the Decree of February 2, 1946, of the Presidium of the USSR Armed Forces, "To establish that since September 20, 1945, all land with its bowels, forests and waters on the territory of the southern part of Sakhalin Island and the Kuril Islands is state property, that is, the national property."
          The Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR.
          Thus, at the time to conduct a survey, are the negotiators with Japan, in which the possibility of transferring these territories to it, state traitors?
          1. Captain Pushkin
            Captain Pushkin 26 November 2018 16: 22
            +1
            Quote: vic02
            at the time to conduct a survey, are the negotiators with Japan, in which the possibility of transferring these territories to it, state traitors?

            And without a survey is not clear?
        5. goose
          goose 26 November 2018 13: 23
          +2
          Quote: Bearded
          Who believes that Russia should not transfer islands to Japan?

          Surveys should not contain denial questions, as this can lead to double interpretations. You wrote in the style of a loan agreement, where usually lawyers specially they introduce many negatives of negation and references to other parts of the contract, bringing it into a completely unreadable form.
        6. snake
          snake 26 November 2018 14: 56
          +2
          Quote: Bearded
          Vote.

          Vote, do not vote, but as we could be convinced by recent laws and decisions, nothing depends on us (the people) in the Russian Federation. If the "authorities" want to give / sell at least a part, at least all the Kuriles, they will do it and will not scratch themselves.
        7. Ivan Ivanov
          Ivan Ivanov 26 November 2018 15: 57
          0
          Yes, with what fright should, by the way, the declaration of 56 implied the complete demilitarization of Japan, i.e. neither the state army nor his own.
        8. Zubr
          Zubr 26 November 2018 19: 18
          0
          hi
          They'll make a corporal of you here now! Comrades, this victim in the person of "Bearded Man", I think, is ill-considered .. smile
      2. Wolverine
        Wolverine 26 November 2018 11: 31
        +3
        Quote: Svarog
        Quote: Tank jacket
        The remaining 95% do not want anything. What can Hitler's allies want? 100 years of execution.

        It would be better to conduct a survey with us, how many Russian citizens are ready to give even two islands of Japan .. Wishlists of the Japanese are not at all interested in them finger in mouth put a hand to bite ..

        Our answer is already clear - from a dead donkey, the ears of the interventionist are worthless.
    2. Egorovich
      Egorovich 26 November 2018 11: 08
      +7
      More than one generation of Japanese will die with the dream of transferring the islands of Russia belonging to Japan to Japan, but no one will see this dream, because it will never come true.
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 26 November 2018 11: 18
        +1
        Only 5 percent of Japanese agree to “receive” 2 islands from Russia

        Only two people in Russia recently spoke of the possibility of transferring two islands of Japan: Putin and Peskov. And the noise was raised, as if a document had already been signed. Should we be interested in the opinion of the Japanese living in their own country? Let's wait for something to mature ...
        1. igorbrsv
          igorbrsv 26 November 2018 11: 30
          0
          Why two? Here at VO, someone claims that next year all the islands will be transferred and the issue is resolved. True to such rumors to trust ... No.
          And why is it needed?
        2. asv96
          asv96 26 November 2018 14: 51
          +1
          Or you can specifically link that they were offering something. It seems like they just voiced the Wishlist of Japan and how the Turks kept how many years the key to the European Union loomed in front of his nose
        3. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 26 November 2018 16: 24
          +2
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Only 5 percent of Japanese agree to “receive” 2 islands from Russia

          Only two people in Russia recently spoke of the possibility of transferring two islands of Japan: Putin and Peskov. And the noise was raised, as if a document had already been signed. Should we be interested in the opinion of the Japanese living in their own country? Let's wait for something to mature ...

          When they give it, then there will definitely be nothing to discuss.
  2. Lieutenant Teterin
    Lieutenant Teterin 26 November 2018 10: 58
    +18
    The "exchange" is not just unequal, it is, to put it mildly, unacceptable for us. The Kuril Islands are not some kind of pile of stones, but an island ridge with deposits of non-ferrous metals. This is not to mention the fact that thanks to these islands, Russia owns a considerable special economic zone in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. The islands are a legitimate trophy of war and there can be no question of "returning" them.
    1. Machito
      Machito 26 November 2018 11: 15
      +3
      The islands are Russian land. Russians used to master the islands before the Japanese. The Kuril Islands were transferred to Japan as a result of various negotiations, but initially they were never Japanese land. Even Hokkaido is not native Japanese land. The Japanese took Hokkaido from the Ainu, who also lived on Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands. Maybe the Russian Federation demand from Japan the return of Hokkaido Ainam?
      1. Lieutenant Teterin
        Lieutenant Teterin 26 November 2018 11: 18
        +5
        Quote: Bearded
        Ponza took Hokkaido from the Ainu, who also lived on Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands. Maybe the Russian Federation demand from Japan the return of Hokkaido Ainam?

        Yes, it would be nice to remind lovers of "historical justice" about real justice and the oppressed situation of the indigenous people of Hokkaido.
    2. 41 REGION
      41 REGION 26 November 2018 11: 37
      +2
      Significantly more (33%) were in favor of the “need to demand” 4 islands of the South Kuril Islands

      : request Somehow modestly request And what does not require Sakhalin, Kamchatka request Personally, I demand the exchange of the Shikotan and Habomai islands for Honshu and Hokaido belay
    3. ver_
      ver_ 26 November 2018 12: 16
      0
      ... rip them off altogether ... and the question is closed ...
    4. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 26 November 2018 16: 28
      0
      Quote: Lieutenant Teterin
      The "exchange" is not just unequal, it is, to put it mildly, unacceptable for us. The Kuril Islands are not some kind of pile of stones, but an island ridge with deposits of non-ferrous metals. This is not to mention the fact that thanks to these islands, Russia owns a considerable special economic zone in the Sea of ​​Okhotsk. The islands are a legitimate trophy of war and there can be no question of "returning" them.

      Between these islands, the only deep-water strait on the Kuril ridge, with depths of about 1500 meters. Those. if we, having transferred two islands, lose control over this strait, then we lose the possibility of a hidden exit of atomic submarines into the ocean.
  3. Loess
    Loess 26 November 2018 10: 59
    +7
    And how many percent of Russians agree that the Japanese will receive "2 islands from Russia"?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Gardamir
    Gardamir 26 November 2018 11: 01
    +5
    Stupid headline. It is clear that more than half want four islands. But let's not talk about the Japanese. So they returned Crimea, but gave part of the sea to the Norwegians, islands to the Chinese, mountains to Azerbaijanis. Now they don’t know how to give the islands to the Japanese.
    1. Loess
      Loess 26 November 2018 11: 07
      +2
      In addition to the Crimea, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk was ...
      1. Tank jacket
        Tank jacket 26 November 2018 11: 15
        +2
        Shvyronadze in the Bering Sea gave 34 thousand square miles of the ASASHAI oil field
        1. Leshy1975
          Leshy1975 26 November 2018 11: 30
          +4
          Quote: Tank jacket
          Shvyronadze in the Bering Sea gave 34 thousand square miles of the ASASHAI oil field

          Slabak was Shevarnadze, just 46,3 thousand square kilometers. Putin and Medvedev were strong: 90 thousand square kilometers of the water were transferred to Norway (by the way, NATO). Well, then they were two taxis, that's 45 thousand square meters. km from the nose and it turned out. Shevarnadze of course radish, there is nothing to discuss here. And Putin (Medvedev, and so they all kick) after that who?
          1. Tank jacket
            Tank jacket 26 November 2018 11: 34
            +5
            The jester knows them, I think this is for the Lomonosov ridge traded.
            1. Leshy1975
              Leshy1975 26 November 2018 11: 45
              +5
              Quote: Tank jacket
              The jester knows them, I think this is for the Lomonosov ridge traded.

              So with the fact that these Motherland can trade, I completely agree. (90 thousand sq. Km. Is already gone, but how it still goes with the Lomonosov ridge is not known at all.) And the expression of the bargaining, very apt, is a plus for you.
    2. DEDPIHTO
      DEDPIHTO 26 November 2018 11: 11
      0
      Quote: Gardamir
      Stupid headline. It is clear that more than half want four islands. But let's not talk about the Japanese. So they returned Crimea, but gave part of the sea to the Norwegians, islands to the Chinese, mountains to Azerbaijanis. Now they don’t know how to give the islands to the Japanese.

      This is the Japanese who do not know how to drive up. laughing An example of a statement- ,, Please give a liter of moonshine (or other) for temporary use ,, (s) wassat And if without jokes, then nako us this ,, peace treaty ,, ... so, a piece of paper to wipe. But a non-guarantor with the stubbornness of a ram continues to stir up, negotiations, with the Eponets request This zhzhzhzh not casual. what
      1. Captain Pushkin
        Captain Pushkin 26 November 2018 16: 34
        +3
        Quote: DEPHIHTO
        non-guarantor with the stubbornness of a ram continues to stir up, negotiations, with the Eponets

        Not one ram does not live as much as ours, I don’t know what to call it, burst into the WTO. Well, finally, we got in there. Already they themselves realized that the Russian Federation from this, except for hemorrhoids, no profits, but no longer able to get out - they are afraid to "lose face" ... You might think they once "found it."
    3. Leshy1975
      Leshy1975 26 November 2018 11: 19
      +2
      Quote: Gardamir
      Stupid headline. It is clear that more than half want four islands. But let's not talk about the Japanese. So they returned Crimea, but gave part of the sea to the Norwegians, islands to the Chinese, mountains to Azerbaijanis. Now they don’t know how to give the islands to the Japanese.

      Yes, I also hope more for the Japanese, with their wish that is not realized today, to get everything at once. I hope less for the patriotism of citizen Putin (together with his retinue).
  5. georggy
    georggy 26 November 2018 11: 02
    +4
    No separate negotiations.
    1. vic02
      vic02 26 November 2018 12: 45
      +1
      What are these "separate negotiations" in general? From whom are they separate?
      1. Captain Pushkin
        Captain Pushkin 26 November 2018 16: 35
        0
        Quote: vic02
        What are these "separate negotiations" in general? From whom are they separate?

        From the Americans. Without their consent, no agreement can be signed with Japan
  6. Ros 56
    Ros 56 26 November 2018 11: 04
    -1
    The Japanese will not get anything, but you can’t tell them so immediately how to hit your head with a butt. Still, the East, God forbid, make hara-kiri with frustration. Again we will be to blame. Do we need it? And slowly, slowly, we will lower this question on the brakes, and okay.
  7. Masya masya
    Masya masya 26 November 2018 11: 06
    +9
    but nothing that no one gives anything back, but are they already being traded?
    1. LMN
      LMN 26 November 2018 11: 10
      +3
      Quote: Masya Masya
      but nothing that no one gives anything back, but are they already being traded?

      Yep, exactly laughing
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 26 November 2018 11: 37
        +1
        Good tattoos .... You need four more figs to add!
        1. LMN
          LMN 26 November 2018 11: 53
          +3
          Quote: Uncle Lee
          Good tattoos .... You need four more figs to add!

          Yeah .. four more in the face, to bring the samurai to the senses lol
          Little they say 2x ..
    2. Guillon
      Guillon 26 November 2018 12: 00
      +2
      A variant of Kuzkin’s mother, the Japs are not considering ?! Absolutely shameless insolent !!! am angry soldier
  8. BAI
    BAI 26 November 2018 11: 08
    +8
    Japan has a law requiring the government to seek the return of the islands. And we need to pass a law that would prohibit the government from negotiating the transfer of the islands.
  9. LMN
    LMN 26 November 2018 11: 09
    +4
    Figase they are arrogant belay
    Who else would give them two laughing
    1. Fkjydjckfrgh
      Fkjydjckfrgh 27 November 2018 16: 49
      0
      Quote: LMN
      Figase they are arrogant belay
      Who else would give them two laughing

      Guess three times, WHO.
  10. Krasnodar
    Krasnodar 26 November 2018 11: 16
    -1
    Can be exchanged for Okinawa. Real estate with American tenants. )))
  11. Gardamir
    Gardamir 26 November 2018 11: 17
    +5
    If they don’t transfer the islands, then why, as in the case of increasing the retirement age, raise this topic from morning till night. They will give it, just until they decided how. Most likely, the people will be announced the joint management of the territories. Putinites will begin to tear the fur about another victory. Only there will be no joint management. Will give unconditionally.
    1. Roy Jones
      Roy Jones 26 November 2018 12: 24
      +1
      What is ready to put for their unambiguous words about the transfer of the islands?
  12. Anatole Klim
    Anatole Klim 26 November 2018 11: 17
    +1
    [quote] [About 67% of Japanese respondents said that such agreements reached between Shinzo Abe and Vladimir Putin support. / quote]
    Something was remembered ...
    Vladimir Vladimirovich, are you a spy or a traitor?
    -You see Yura ...
  13. Dreiko11
    Dreiko11 26 November 2018 11: 17
    +2
    what this piece of paper gives us ... we with Europe seem to have also signed something with America ... but the point is .... relations are far from friendly ....
  14. prior
    prior 26 November 2018 11: 19
    0
    The US experience with the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as a way to persuade the Japanese to sign a peace treaty without any conditions and islands, is an example of resolving territorial disputes.
    While there is no peace treaty between our countries, formally there is still a war.
    1. Avior
      Avior 26 November 2018 12: 04
      -1
      no, there has been no state of war since 1956.
      1. Captain Pushkin
        Captain Pushkin 26 November 2018 21: 08
        +1
        Quote: Avior
        no, there has been no state of war since 1956.

        Japan signed unconditional surrender in 1945. How can one be at war with a surrendered state?
    2. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 26 November 2018 13: 00
      +1
      Quote: prior
      While there is no peace treaty between our countries, formally there is still a war.

      They have a war with the USSR formally, and not with the Russian Federation. The same is true about the islands, which, according to the Constitution, are the territory of the Russian Federation, the one who will give them up must go to trial for treason, this is all clearly stated
      1. Avior
        Avior 26 November 2018 16: 12
        -1
        war with the USSR officially ended in 1956
        there is an agreement in which it is stipulated
  15. jayich
    jayich 26 November 2018 11: 23
    0
    And not to go to the Japanese on foot erotic journey ...
  16. bbss
    bbss 26 November 2018 11: 25
    0
    And they don’t want to give Hokkaido?
  17. REEKMAN
    REEKMAN 26 November 2018 11: 28
    0
    From a dead donkey their ears, and not our islands of the Kuril ridge!
  18. Strashila
    Strashila 26 November 2018 11: 28
    +1
    And 95% of Japanese people fear that Russia, referring to Japan’s arguments about the northern territories, may recognize Hokkaido as the southern extension of the Kuril ridge and demand it.
  19. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 26 November 2018 11: 31
    0
    It is necessary to look at the question differently. Shinzo Abe is the Governor of the Japanese Federal District as part of the Russian Federation. And the base on Okinawa to transfer to the Russian Navy.
  20. Cap.nemo58rus
    Cap.nemo58rus 26 November 2018 11: 31
    +1
    The donut hole is for them, not the islands! Fans of the polls are so rastak. Keep your Wishlist with you. And the peace treaty will wait another half a century, it’s not burning.
  21. Hunter1
    Hunter1 26 November 2018 11: 38
    0
    Listen, the authors of VO, it may be enough to abuse quotes in the headings and not only? The eye hurts. If your opinion on this or other issues is different, this is not a reason to shove your sarcasm everywhere. Or are you trying for the watchman?
  22. K-50
    K-50 26 November 2018 11: 38
    0
    Their ears are from a herring, not an island. yes angry laughing
  23. A good one
    A good one 26 November 2018 11: 47
    +3
    How serious they are there. smile They decided everything and we were not asked.
    1. LMN
      LMN 26 November 2018 12: 25
      +1
      Quote: Not bad
      How serious they are there. smile They decided everything and we were not asked.

      Vitaliy ... there apparently Hirasima and Nagasaki influenced the consciousness of an entire nation. hi
      They think the campaign that the Russian Federation is figure skating and cheburashki laughing
      1. A good one
        A good one 26 November 2018 13: 26
        +3
        Maxim, hello! hi They are lagging behind life, they think that once the West "kicks" us, then something will break off for them. Of course it can break off by both. smile
        1. LMN
          LMN 26 November 2018 13: 39
          +3
          Quote: Not bad
          Maxim, hello! hi They are lagging behind life, they think that once the West "kicks" us, then something will break off for them. Of course it can break off by both. smile

          I'm not sure that the "West" is kicking us .. winked

          I’ve watched a program here about an ice cream cafe in Japan. Hundreds of varieties !! The Koreans took three different varieties. He just couldn’t eat !! With a shark and a snake! wassat In ice cream there were pieces of shark and snake !! but there is also beef, pork, etc.
          Can you imagine what it should be in your head, what would it be ?! There radiation is full of brain
          1. A good one
            A good one 26 November 2018 14: 00
            +5
            "Yes, I'm not sure that the" West "kicks us .."
            Yes, and I'm not sure laughing

            I watched on YouTube a survey of residents of some Ukrainian town, topic: the difference between Ukrainians and Russians.
            The predominant answers are:
            - we have hunger in Russia, the shelves are empty;
            - we are Russian lazy and drunkards;
            - Ukrainian people are united;
            - Well, here we’ll overthrow the Putin regime.
            - moral decay in the Russian army.
            So, this is the Ukrainian outback, and what kind of cockroaches in the head of the Japanese, one can only speculate.
            1. LMN
              LMN 26 November 2018 14: 16
              +1
              So, this is the Ukrainian outback, and what kind of cockroaches in the head of the Japanese, one can only speculate.

              Yeah .. how much I was interested in Europeans at one time, I lost interest in Japan No. There they have a "phase shift" of some sort, in many things, not only in food .. what
              By the way .. they also live on the island, like the British. winked And the United States, in fact, is also "isolated" ..
              Maybe there is some connection? request
              1. Fkjydjckfrgh
                Fkjydjckfrgh 27 November 2018 17: 03
                0
                Quote: LMN
                So, this is the Ukrainian outback, and what kind of cockroaches in the head of the Japanese, one can only speculate.

                Yeah .. how much I was interested in Europeans at one time, I lost interest in Japan No. There they have a "phase shift" of some sort, in many things, not only in food .. what
                By the way .. they also live on the island, like the British. winked And the United States, in fact, is also "isolated" ..
                Maybe there is some connection? request

                The connection is primitive on the surface: the mentality he does not fall from the sky. All island nations are cannibals (frantic chauvinists). These are the conditions for the survival of peoples with objective limited resources, including food (there is not enough food for everyone, it is impossible to migrate, so we will cut those who break the egg from the blunt end)
  24. Halado Romane
    Halado Romane 26 November 2018 11: 49
    +2
    Agree on two islands ?! Ha! They say, well, they persuaded the bride! Now the main thing is to persuade the groom! The bride will be killed without any islands.
  25. 2224460
    2224460 26 November 2018 11: 50
    +2
    Awesome news, the yupps are asked how much they want our land two or four islands, I am wildly sorry, but the citizens of Russia were asked whether we want to give or barely and do not need to ask?
  26. Sadko88
    Sadko88 26 November 2018 11: 57
    +1
    It would populate our entire territory relatively evenly. That's the problem
    1. Roy Jones
      Roy Jones 26 November 2018 12: 26
      -1
      What is the problem then? Settlements and even cities are in almost every part of the territory. With this opinion, why haven’t you moved yet, for example to .. Oymyakon?
  27. rocket757
    rocket757 26 November 2018 11: 58
    0
    From a dead donkey ears - that’s our whole answer should be.
  28. Berkut24
    Berkut24 26 November 2018 11: 58
    +1
    Only 5 percent of Japanese agree to “receive” 2 islands from Russia

    Let’s conduct a counter survey with us on just one island - Hokkaido.
  29. WarriorWolf
    WarriorWolf 26 November 2018 12: 00
    +1
    And if on the contrary, the Japanese give us 2-3 islands, and we’ll think to sign a peace treaty ...
  30. Mentat
    Mentat 26 November 2018 12: 02
    +2
    Quote: ROSS 42
    Only two people in Russia recently spoke of the possibility of transferring two islands of Japan: Putin and Peskov.

    These two people spoke the exact opposite. But why you make such statements is not clear.
    Nothing good can be built on lies, deceit and attempts to mislead.

    Give quotes from Putin or Peskov, where they say this.
    Don't you value your dignity at all? Confirm your words, so as not to be a cheap blanket from the Internet.
    1. Roy Jones
      Roy Jones 26 November 2018 12: 35
      +1
      Once again, to say that Putin and Medvedev are evil, even using fiction for this, this is the goal of the life of some Internet users)
  31. timothy61
    timothy61 26 November 2018 12: 05
    0
    Tired already, why this topic is exaggerated on.
    1. Axel
      Axel 26 November 2018 12: 19
      0
      Me too. Admins themselves are not zadolbalo pour from empty to empty. It would be better to write about Pakistan.
    2. Roy Jones
      Roy Jones 26 November 2018 12: 38
      +1
      The other day I read an article about the purpose of the message for all to see, about the resumption of negotiations for a peace treaty with Japan. Judging by that article, it was a temptation for the Japanese, such as beckoning a bone. But it was also written there that only our media and stupid internet liberals pecked at this lure)
  32. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 26 November 2018 12: 25
    +1
    It turned out that only 5% of respondents support the signing of a peace treaty with Russia when transferring two islands (Shikotan and Habomai) to Tokyo's jurisdiction. Significantly more (33%) favored the “need for demand” of the 4 South Kuril Islands, which in Japan continue to be called the Northern Territories

    Well, wanting is not harmful, but taking into account the overpopulation of Japan and the energy crisis - plus four islands for dzhapov panacea for all ills. Carrying out such questions in Japan is like conducting polls whether the sun will rise tomorrow - the answer will be very predictable.
    Another thing - to hell with them, for medicinal purposes. The Kuril Islands are watered with the blood of a Russian soldier. They belong to Russia. All. Dot. No discussion.
  33. Vinnibuh
    Vinnibuh 26 November 2018 12: 27
    +2
    Yes, send yap to haer (such a hairstyle), got it already! They already managed to share everything, we want it, we don’t want it. Let's go to the opera with their peace treaties! Before that, all the rules were, not, Russia, a generous soul. Female dogs!
  34. Shuttle
    Shuttle 26 November 2018 13: 15
    +1
    A peace treaty with a sovereign neighbor is a thing really necessary and useful in every way.
    However, it is not clear how a peace treaty can be signed with a country whose territory is occupied by troops of another state. This is about how to sign a peace treaty with Paris in July 1940.
    Putin clearly answered - you give a guarantee that there will be no American bases - we’ll talk.


    Translated from the diplomatic - a hole for you from a donut, not Sharapov!
  35. darksoul
    darksoul 26 November 2018 13: 23
    +1
    Why did they begin to process us so actively ..... we won’t give it away, but right now the next day I hear about two islands?
  36. Kapkan
    Kapkan 26 November 2018 13: 31
    +2
    It may be better to ask the citizens of Russia how they feel about the delivery of at least 1 m2. to anyone? Not? request
    I now do not care how many Japs for or against.
  37. Victor1
    Victor1 26 November 2018 13: 58
    +1
    the informational noise on this subject will continue, it’s not good for all this ...
  38. Bolo
    Bolo 26 November 2018 15: 02
    0
    Dear Japanese prisoners of war, please conduct such a survey with us in Russia, I promise you guys, you will really like the result!
  39. faterdom
    faterdom 26 November 2018 17: 16
    +1
    Due to the fact that we really want, but we will not give it up: It is important not to lose face - you must definitely make a sepukka!
  40. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 26 November 2018 19: 06
    +1
    We fought with Japan for 78 years and 78 more can ...
  41. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 26 November 2018 19: 30
    0
    Why Japan will not be presented with encephalitis tick infection in the Far Eastern taiga?
  42. Cro-Magnon
    Cro-Magnon 27 November 2018 03: 23
    +2
    Salupu on the narrow-eyed collar. Which islands ??? You are the same fascists as nemchura - only in the East. Forget about our islands!
  43. LeonidL
    LeonidL 27 November 2018 04: 18
    0
    Only 2 percent of Russians agree to transfer at least something to Japan, and even those liberals and office plankton with Bolotnaya. I do not think that Putin is ready to commit political hara-kiri at the end of his political career. Enough mistakes 2014 with Ukraine.
  44. sleeve
    sleeve 27 November 2018 08: 21
    +1
    On January 26, 1904 (Feb. 10), Japan's treacherous attack on the Russian sea fortress Port Arthur, the blockade and battle with the "diplomatic" cruiser "Varyag". A long, almost two-year war, which cost Russia tens of thousands of killed.
    1927-1935, the confrontation in Manchuria with numerous conflicts on the border with both the Japanese and the puppet of the Japanese state-man Manchzhou-Guo.
    July August 1938 - fighting near Lake Khasan.
    May-September 1939 fighting at Khalkhin Gol.
    The years 1940-1945 are numerous marine incidents in spite of the neutrality pact.
    August 9-September 3, 1945 -Soviet-Japanese war, costing the USSR 12 thousand killed and 25 thousand wounded.

    Who are you?! Sit under a broom and wish to be friends! Have you forgotten the place? Or did you manage to drift into "innocent victims"? What "Wishlist"?
  45. 1536
    1536 27 November 2018 14: 10
    0
    Really the history of the criminal "transfer" of the Crimean peninsula to the Ukrainian SSR does not teach anything (especially now), if they have completely forgotten the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905, the battles on Khalkhin-Gol and the lake. Hasan, the crimes of the Japanese against humanity during the Second World War, the war for the liberation of Manchuria and China (9.08.1945/2.09.1945/XNUMX-XNUMX) and the sacrifices our people suffered in this struggle against the Japanese for our ancestral lands in the Far East in the XNUMXth century ?
  46. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 27 November 2018 18: 35
    0
    I regret in this matter only one thing: the lack of a sufficient number of delivery vehicles in the Soviet Navy in August 1945 in general for Hokaido!
    And such idiotic questions would not arise at all!
  47. ochakow703
    ochakow703 27 November 2018 20: 12
    0
    And I also conducted a survey with similar questions. The neighbors swore and sent, and at work the peasants wanted to fill their faces. Conclusion: we don’t need someone else’s, but we’ll break it for our own!