Japanese musketeers

47
I don't remember already whom I promised, but I do remember exactly what I promised the material about the Japanese firearms weapon Sengoku era. And once promised something, you should fulfill the promise. And it should immediately be said (and this is unlikely to be an exaggeration) that this era just became a kind of reaction of Japanese society to a new weapon that entered the country of the rising sun in 1543 year.

Then three Portuguese merchants were thrown by a storm on the shore of the island of Tangegashima, and this seemingly insignificant event became a truly gift of fate for the whole of Japan. The Japanese were struck by the very appearance of the “long-nosed barbarians”, their clothes and speech, and what they held in their hands - “something long, with a hole in the middle and an ingenious device closer to the tree, which they rested on their shoulder ... then fire flew out of it , there was a deafening thunder and a lead ball at a distance of thirty paces killed a bird!



Daime of Tanegashima Island Tochikata, having paid a lot of money, bought two "teppo", as the Japanese called this strange weapon, and gave it to his blacksmith to make an analogue no worse. Since the Portuguese fired from “this” without a stand, it should be assumed that it was not a heavy musket that fell into the hands of the Japanese, but a relatively light arquebus, the dimensions and weight of which allowed hand-held shooting. However, it was not possible to make an analog at first. The Japanese blacksmith was able to forge the barrel without much difficulty, but it turned out to be too much for him to cut the internal thread in the back of the barrel and insert the “plug” there. However, a few months later, another Portuguese came to the island, and here it is, as the legend tells, and showed the Japanese masters how to do it. All other details were easy to do. So very soon, on the island of Tanegashima, the production of the first in stories Japan firearms. Moreover, from the very beginning, the production of "tanegashima" (the Japanese began to call it that way), went at an accelerated pace. For six months, 600 Arquebuses was made on the island, which Totikata immediately sold out. As a result, not only enriched himself, but also contributed to its widespread distribution.


Modern Japanese "musketeers" - participants of demonstrations with shooting.


And this is the real “Tanegashima” of the Edo era from the Tokaido Museum, in Hakon.

Already in 1549, daimyo Shimazu Takahisa applied tanegasimu in battle, and then every year its popularity grew more and more. Takeda Shingen, for example, already in 1555 year, paying tribute to these weapons, bought at least 300 such arquebuses, and already Oda Nobunaga (this one loved everything European, starting with wine and ending with furniture!) 20 years later had 3000 arrows at his disposal in the battle of Nagashino. Moreover, he used them very modernly, having built in three lines so that they fired over each other’s heads, and from the attacks of Katsuri's cavalry they would be covered by a lattice fence.


Japanese teppo from the museum in the castle of Kumamoto. In the foreground is the “handgun” of kakae-zutsu.


The same museum, the same arquebus, but only the rear view. The device of their wick locks is clearly visible.

Moreover, it should be noted that, although for some reason it is considered otherwise, in fact, the samurai in the Sengoku era did not at all disdain to use teppo and use it personally. That, they say, this is a “vile” and unsuitable weapon for a samurai. On the contrary, they very quickly appreciated its advantages and many of them, including the same Oda Nabunaga, turned into well-aimed shooters. The continuous wars of all against all just at that time caused a truly mass production of this type of weapon, but they, of course, did not like the fact that it began to fall even into the hands of the peasants. And very soon the number of arquebuses in Japan exceeded their number in Europe, which, by the way, was one of the reasons why neither the Spaniards nor the Portuguese even tried to conquer it and turn it into their colony. Moreover, the Japanese achieved real mastery in the manufacture of their teppo, as evidenced by the samples of these weapons that have come down to us and are stored today in museums.


Tanegashima and pistora. Museum of Asian Art, San Francisco.

Note that the word “teppo” in Japan denoted a whole class of weapons, but at first it was the arquebus made according to the Portuguese model that was called, although such a name as hinawa-ju or “wick gun” is also known. But over time, Japanese craftsmen began to make their own gunpowder weapons, no longer similar to the original samples, that is, they developed their own style and traditions of its production.

Japanese musketeers

Samurai Niiro Tdamoto with teppo in hand. Uki-yo Utagawa Yoshiyku.

So what is the difference between Japanese arquebus and European ones? Let's start with the fact that they have the reverse arrangement of the serpentine (trigger) with hibasami for the hinawa wick. Among the Europeans, he was in front and leaned back "toward himself." The Japanese - he was attached behind the breech and leaned back "from himself". In addition, it seemed to them, and not without reason, that the burning wick, located at a close distance from the shelf with seed gunpowder, called hidzara, was not the best neighborhood, and they came up with a sliding hibuta cover that reliably closed this shelf. The lid moved and only after that it was necessary to pull the trigger to fire a shot. The barrel length of the Japanese arquebus was approximately 90 cm, but the calibers varied - from 13 to 20 mm. The stock was made of red oak wood, almost the entire length of the barrel, which was fixed in it with traditional bamboo pins, just like the blades of Japanese swords, which were attached to the handle in a similar way. By the way, the locks of Japanese guns were also fastened on pins. The Japanese did not like screws, unlike the Europeans. A ramrod is a simple wooden (karuka) or bamboo (seseri) recessed into the box. At the same time, a feature of the Japanese gun was ... the absence of a butt as such! Instead, there was a daijiri pistol grip, which was pressed against the cheek before firing! That is, the recoil was perceived on the barrel and then on the hand, went down and moved back, but the gun did not give back to the shoulder. That is why, by the way, the Japanese were so fond of faceted - six and octagonal trunks. They were both stronger and heavier and ... better extinguished recoil due to their mass! In addition, their edges were convenient to draw. Although, we also note this, the decoration of the trunks of Japanese teppo did not differ in special frills. Usually they depicted monks - the emblems of the clan that ordered the weapons were covered with gilding or varnish.


Bajo-zutsu is a rider's pistol, and richly trimmed. Edo Epoch. Anne and Gabriel Barbier-Muller Museum, Texas.


The Tandzutsu is an Edo-era short pistol. Anne and Gabriel Barbier-Muller Museum, Texas.

The details of the locks, including the springs, were made of brass. It did not corrode like iron (which is very important in the Japanese climate!), but most importantly, it allowed all the details to be cast. That is, the production of locks was fast and efficient. Moreover, even brass springs turned out to be more profitable than steel European ones. How? Yes, those that were weaker !!! And it turned out that the Japanese serpentine with a wick approached the seed more slowly than the European one, and it happened to hit the shelf with such force that ... it went out at the moment of impact, without even having time to ignite the gunpowder, which caused a misfire!


For sniper shooting, the Japanese made such long-barreled shotguns with barrels 1,80 mm long and even 2 meters. The Nagoya Castle Museum.

The Japanese arquebuses had sights, a saki-me-ate front sight and ato-me-ate rear sight, and ... the original, again varnished, boxes covering the lock from rain and snow.


Niiro Tadamoto with cocoa jutsu. Uki-yo Utagawa Yoshiyku.


Hitting a cocoa-zutsu explosive projectile in a tate shield. Uki-ё Utagawa Kuniyoshi.

As a result, Japanese arquebuses became more massive than European ones, although they were still lighter than muskets. In addition, the Japanese came up with the so-called "hand guns" or kakae-zutsu, somewhat similar to European hand grenade launchers used since the XNUMXth century. But although their similarity is undeniable, the Japanese design is very different from the European one, and is an independent invention. The European mortar always had a stock and behind it a short barrel designed for throwing matchlock grenades. The Japanese jutsu did not have a butt, but they fired fired clay balls and lead cannonballs from it. The barrel was quite long, but the powder charge was small. Thanks to this, it was possible to shoot from the "hand gun" really, holding it in hand. The payoff was great, of course. The “gun” could be pulled out of his hands, and if the shooter held it tightly, then it would not overturn him on the ground. And, nevertheless, it was possible to shoot in this way from it. Although another method was also used: the shooter laid out a pyramid of three bundles of rice straw on the ground and laid a “cannon” on it, resting the handle on the ground or another sheaf, lined with two stakes from behind. Having set the desired angle of inclination of the barrel, the shooter pulled the trigger and fired a shot. The bullet flew along a steep trajectory, which made it possible to fire at enemies hiding behind the walls of the castle in this way. It happened that gunpowder rockets were inserted into the barrel of a kakae-zutsu and thus greatly increased the firing range.


Guns from the arsenal of Himeji Castle.

Known were the Japanese and pistols, called them a pistol. Yes, they were wicked, but were used by samurai riders in the same way as European reiters. They were heading in the direction of the enemy, and, approaching him, they almost fired a shot, and then returned back, reloading their weapons on the move.


Asigaru, hiding behind tate shields, fire on the enemy. Illustration from Dzhohyo Monogatari. National Museum, Tokyo.

Another very important invention that increased the rate of fire of Japanese weapons was the invention of specially designed wooden cartridges. It is known that at first gunpowder was poured into the same arquebuses from a powder flask, after which a bullet was pushed towards it with a ramrod. In Rus', archers kept pre-measured powder charges in wooden "cartridges" - "chargers". Where they appeared before - in our country or in Europe, it is difficult to say, but they appeared and it became more convenient to immediately load the squeaks and muskets. But the bullet still had to be taken out of the bag. The solution to the problem was a paper cartridge, in which both a bullet and gunpowder are in one paper wrapper. Now the soldier bit the shell of such a cartridge with his teeth (hence the command “bite the cartridge!”), poured a certain amount of gunpowder onto the seed shelf, and poured the rest of the gunpowder together with the bullet into the barrel and tamped it with a ramrod, using the paper itself as a wad cartridge.

The Japanese invented a “charge” with two (!) Holes and a conical channel inside. At the same time, one of them was closed by a spring-loaded lid, while the other hole was a “plug” served by the bullet itself!


"Varnished boxes against the rain." Engraving Utagawa Kuniyoshi.

Well, now let's imagine that we are “Japanese Musketeers” and we have to fire at the enemy.

So, standing on one knee, at the command of the co-gasir (“junior lieutenant”), we take out our wooden cartridge from the cartridge bag, open it and pour all the gunpowder into the barrel. And you just need to press the bullet protruding from it with your finger, and it will instantly slide into the barrel. We remove the cartridge and ram the gunpowder and bullet with a ramrod. We remove the ramrod and fold back the cover of the powder shelf. Smaller seed gunpowder is poured onto a shelf from a separate powder flask. We close the cover of the shelf, and blow off the excess gunpowder from the shelf so that it does not flare up before the allotted time. Now fan the flame at the tip of the wick wrapped around the left hand. The wick itself is made of fibers of cedar bark, so it smolders well and does not go out. Now the wick is inserted into the serpentine. Ko-gashiru commands the first aiming. Then the shelf lid opens. Now you can make the final aim, and pull the trigger. The burning wick will gently press against the gunpowder on the shelf and a shot will occur!


The armor of the warrior ashigaru works of the American reenactor Matt Poitras, already familiar to VO readers in his armor of the soldiers of the Trojan War, as well as the Greeks and Romans.

It is interesting that the Japanese also knew the bayonet-type blade bayonet - dzyuken and the spear-shaped bayonet juso, as well as guns and pistols with wheel and flintlocks. They knew, but since they entered the era of the Edo world, they did not feel any need for them. But now, in peacetime, it was the sword that became the main weapon of the samurai, and the guns that the peasants could successfully fight with, faded into the background. However, it happened, we emphasize, this was already in the Edo era!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    30 November 2018 06: 18
    Interesting. That only a storm from the sea-ocean will not drift.

    And do not hide behind any curtain.
    1. 0
      30 November 2018 06: 48
      It is interesting that if at the time of the storm you were in the water and hoped only that you had enough strength not to drown and that God would send the earth under your feet as soon as a reward for your desire for life, you would continue to keep in your hands one and a half meter, weighing several kg. , arquebus? lol laughing wink
      1. +2
        30 November 2018 06: 58
        And a lot of what is thrown ashore.

        For example, a barrel with Prince Guidon.

        It’s not necessary to drown, like the Ball from Prostokvashino.

        And everyone will be able to draw a picture.
        1. +1
          30 November 2018 07: 04
          Quote from Korsar4
          For example, a barrel with Prince Guidon.

          Those. Do you equate official history with fairy tales? belay lol wink
          Quote from Korsar4
          And everyone will be able to draw a picture.

          "We don't know what really happened, but we think it was that way." hi lol
          1. +4
            30 November 2018 07: 06
            To some extent.

            Do not like Gwidon and the Ball, take Robinson.

            And the question is whether the Portuguese docked or were thrown away - the details.
            1. +2
              30 November 2018 07: 12
              Quote from Korsar4
              And the question is whether the Portuguese docked or were thrown away - the details.

              It does not seem to you that "threw out" and "moored" - these are completely different concepts that have a key influence on the development of the situation. The perception of the situation depends on this. So we can say that Columbus was also washed ashore. These will be details. But they say that he landed, from boats, with weapons of dry powder wink And then you were "thrown ashore" and you will be completely unfamiliar to abrigines with completely incomprehensible languages ​​after drying the weapon to show with the last saved charge how you can kill a bird? belay laughing
              Topic closed hi
              1. +5
                30 November 2018 07: 24
                I always liked to open doors, closed topics.

                The Portuguese landed. I do not presume to discuss the details of the landing.
                Sold a couple of guns.

                This is the outline. And let everyone color in his own colors.
                1. +1
                  30 November 2018 07: 33
                  Quote from Korsar4
                  The Portuguese landed.

                  what
                  Then three Portuguese merchants threw a storm on the shore of the island of Tangegashima, and this seemingly insignificant event was for all of Japan a truly gift of fate

                  request
                  Quote from Korsar4
                  Sold a couple of guns.

                  belay Just like Columbus beads for gold changed lol request Parallels do not bother? wassat

                  Quote from Korsar4
                  This is the outline. And let everyone color in his own colors.

                  That is why alternative specialists appear, because historians are so coloring up the assumptions in their own way that water turns into wine, and tithing is an exorbitant tax wink drinks Topic closed hi For me personally smile
                  1. +4
                    30 November 2018 07: 42
                    That is, the previous closure was not real?

                    I did not come across the Portuguese ship's magazine, and the guestbook of a guest hotel.

                    I didn’t even read Iskanderov.

                    The island and the Portuguese are available. The year is also approximately clear. Why an alternative?

                    "We don't need a blacksmith" (c).
                    1. +5
                      30 November 2018 11: 11
                      “On purpose or by accident,” said the boa constrictor, “but it was a great discovery.
                      “Listen,” said the monkey, “but can’t this law be closed somehow back?”
                      - The law of nature, - the boa constrictor was indignant, - you cannot close it! "

                      Whatever topic is promised, thanks, as a good filmstrip, pictures and story. Filmstrips are good seeds.
        2. +2
          30 November 2018 07: 04
          And the "coastal law", again, has not been canceled
          Let's see what the tide brought today laughing
          1. +2
            30 November 2018 07: 10
            For some reason, the first bottle of bison came to mind, and so on.

            But the post has just begun.
            1. +2
              30 November 2018 08: 36
              Me, by the way, too.
      2. +1
        30 November 2018 07: 47
        Quote: Rurikovich
        and that God would send the earth as soon as possible

        And what does "god" have to do with it? Or, in your opinion, "God" moves islands and continents at "your request"?
        Maybe it's enough to stick "God" everywhere without a place?
      3. 0
        30 November 2018 16: 12
        And the powder was very afraid of moisture, something in this legend does not dock.
        1. +1
          30 November 2018 17: 51
          Black powder is dried. Servants and all kinds of adventurers did this regularly, judging by the recollections.
  2. +2
    30 November 2018 06: 48
    The Japanese, of course, have their own way, but I got the impression that at a certain stage in the development of civilization, the appearance, improvement, and massive use of firearms leads the country's state system to absolutism.
    1. +2
      30 November 2018 10: 23
      Quote: 3x3zsave
      I got the impression that at a certain stage of the development of civilization, the appearance, improvement and massive use of firearms leads the state system of the country to absolutism.

      These changes are driven primarily by economic reasons. Absolutism is a consequence of the transition from a large patrimonial economy to a small-scale one, and this transition, in turn, was due to economic reasons - the development of means of production and an increase in surplus product, the emergence of areas and regions with a narrow specialization of labor, the need to develop duty-free trade, the unification of legislation and tax rules , population growth, the emergence of the bourgeoisie, etc. smile
      If a firearm would massively appear, for example, in the XIII century that way, it would hardly lead to absolutism. Equestrian detachments of feudal lords, armed with muskets and pistols instead of bows and sulits, would also go, and the peasants in the field would also not care where and why they were going.
      I would say the emergence and wide distribution of firearms contributed the establishment of absolutism due to its availability and democracy (in the sense, the pool does not care who gets into the graph or the commoner, the effect is the same), nothing more.
      1. +1
        30 November 2018 21: 59
        This is the whole thing, the phenomena are interconnected and interconnected.
        You can imagine the option when there is no firearm in principle. Will we try?
  3. +9
    30 November 2018 06: 49
    imposing guns
    and beautiful
    Article - plus
  4. +2
    30 November 2018 08: 07
    The Japanese blacksmith was able to forge the barrel without much difficulty, but he was unable to cut the internal thread at the rear of the barrel and insert the “plug” there. However, a few months later, another Portuguese came to the island, and here it is, as the legend tells, and showed the Japanese masters how to do it.
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, you know very well that cutting an internal thread is a rather difficult task, and especially tightening so that there is no gas breakthrough. Yes, and the level of technology of that time in Japan, you correctly noted, mainly included casting and forging, rather than machining.
    1. 0
      30 November 2018 10: 17
      Quote: Amurets
      that cutting an internal thread is quite a challenge

      Isn't it easier to brew or even just rivet and pour lead from the inside?
      1. +1
        30 November 2018 12: 08
        Quote: brn521
        The Japanese blacksmith was able to forge the barrel without much difficulty, but he was unable to cut the internal thread at the rear of the barrel and insert the “plug” there. However, a few months later, another Portuguese came to the island, and here it is, as the legend tells, and showed the Japanese masters how to do it.
        So according to the text of the author.
        Quote: brn521
        Quote: Amurets
        that cutting an internal thread is quite a challenge

        Isn't it easier to brew or even just rivet and pour lead from the inside?
      2. 0
        30 November 2018 14: 14
        Quote: brn521
        Isn't it easier to brew or even just rivet and pour lead from the inside?

        a rivet and even more so lead will squeeze out. And brew ... it's blacksmith welding, for reliable welding, you need to compress at least 25 percent - and how do you save the dimensions? And just flatten and weld - so then the welded trunks and so often tore along the welding line!
  5. +2
    30 November 2018 12: 31
    I will allow myself to somewhat supplement the article.
    Let's start with the statement that firearms came to Japan in 1543. Perhaps here we are faced with one of the first examples of what is now called PR-technologies. After all, the story of the three Portuguese and their arquebuses became known about fifty years after the events described from the Records of Guns (Teppoki) by the Buddhist monk Nampo Bunno. And the monk compiled these very notes at the request of ... the Tanegashima family! Obviously, the head of the family considered that the glory of the ancestor of Japanese small arms would not be superfluous at all.
    Meanwhile, in the very title of the monk’s work, the word “teppo” is used to refer to the arquebus, which was known to the Japanese long before the Portuguese brought their arquebus to the island of Tanegashima. This word is found already in the texts of the end of the 1543th - the first half of the 1409th centuries. Considering Japan's ties with China, where handguns appeared clearly before 1419, it should be recognized as a more objective version that firearms were known in Japan at least during the Muromachi period. The Korean "Authentic Chronicle of the Li Dynasty" reports that when the Japanese ambassadors in XNUMX and XNUMX. traveled to Korea, both times they personally observed the firing of handguns on the island of Tsushima.
    For those who speak Japanese, I can recommend Takuhisa Udagawa's book "A Study of the History of the Use of Weapons in East Asia in the Light of the History of the Distribution of Weapons in the XNUMXth-XNUMXth Centuries"受 容 と 伝 播)
    And a few technical details. Japanese blacksmiths really did not know how to cut the internal thread. But this did not become an obstacle for them - they drowned the barrel with a wedge, as they did at first in Europe.
    And when the Europeans shared the secret, they began to make a cap on the thread. There is even a legend that Tanegashima Tokitaka gave his beautiful daughter to the Portuguese for this secret.
    Well, about that, "what is the difference between the Japanese arquebus and the European ones? Let's start with the fact that they have the reverse arrangement of the serpentine (trigger) with hibas for the hinawa wick. The Europeans had it in front and leaned back" to itself. "The Japanese - it was attached behind the breech of the barrel and leaned “away from itself.” In addition, it seemed to them, and not without reason, that the burning wick, located at a close distance from the shelf with seed gunpowder, called hidzara, was not the best neighborhood, and they came up with a sliding hibut cover , which securely closed this shelf.
    Let's start with the locks. European wick locks had three varieties.

    As can be seen from the figure, only the castle of the XNUMXth century had the opposite location of the trigger, it was also called German. So the Japanese simply "underdeveloped" to the European design. The same is about the shelf cover. I will not insert the second illustration, those who wish can see for themselves - European arquebusses with a wick lock also have a lid.
  6. 0
    30 November 2018 13: 18
    The article is interesting, informative, but ...

    The Japanese blacksmith was able to forge the barrel without much difficulty, but he was unable to cut the internal thread at the rear of the barrel and insert the “plug” there.

    For me, that’s how the barrel was always cast. And what technology is there to forge a hollow tube with a hammer and hammer in the 16th century with a hammer and hammer?

    The rifled barrel itself began to be manufactured in Europe in the 16th century. The oldest surviving are German fittings. And in them the cut was in the barrel, which increased the accuracy of fire.

    These Portuguese arquebusses were smooth-bore. But why make a thread in the rear of the barrel and then plug it with a "plug". Is it not simpler, not more technologically advanced, just not to make the barrel through, but immediately make one end of the barrel without a hole?
    1. +2
      30 November 2018 14: 03
      Quote: Tarkhan
      For me, that’s how the barrel was always cast. And what technology is there to forge a hollow tube with a hammer and hammer in the 16th century with a hammer and hammer?

      Only cannon (bronze, from the 1866th century - cast iron) were cast, and rifle (iron) ones were forged. After the appearance of the Bessemer converter, the Germans switched to steel casting, but a bunch of Krupp guns in the Austro-Prussian War of XNUMX tore, and for a couple of years they had to return to the so-called. "steel bronze" of Baron von Uchazius - while the great D.K. Chernov hi in 1868 he did not discover the "Chernov points". And the technology is EMNIP, in the XNUMXth century a strip was forged, first it was bent with the letter U, then the edges were bent and butt-welded. Of course, the trunks often vomited along the welding line. Later, they began to make a narrower strip and wind it onto a mandrel (again, plus forge welding) - this became much more reliable. This was done a century and a half ago (moreover, the ribbon was often forged from "bouquet Damascus")

      Quote: Tarkhan
      Is it not easier, not more technological, just not to make the barrel end-to-end, and immediately make one end of the barrel without an opening?

      As you can easily guess from my description - no simpler.
      1. 0
        30 November 2018 14: 14
        Clear. I did not think up my question.

        Yes, casting alone does not give the same strength as forging. The specific gravity of iron during casting is less than the specific gravity of iron during forging or rolling. Therefore, the welded towers of the German Panthers and Tigers of rolled armor were more durable than the cast towers 34.
        1. +2
          30 November 2018 14: 20
          Quote: Tarkhan
          casting alone does not give the strength that forging

          It depends on how you pour, forge and, most importantly, heat treat. The same Chernov proved that with competent casting and heat treatment, molten trunks are practically not inferior to rolled ones. But before Chernov was another 300 years. And in our time, casting with complex technological refinements will cost more than rolling without such frills.
        2. +1
          30 November 2018 15: 28
          Quote: Tarkhan
          Therefore, the welded towers of the German Panthers and Tigers of rolled armor were more durable than the cast towers 34.

          Perhaps, but the rivets on the armor did not always withstand the blows of the armor-piercing projectile and sometimes a whole sheet of armor tore off.
        3. +3
          30 November 2018 15: 50
          "The specific gravity of iron in casting is less than the specific gravity of iron in forging or rolling."
          The specific gravity of iron is 7,874 g / cm. cube (unit MKGSS), regardless of how the product is obtained from steel in which iron is present.
          1. -1
            30 November 2018 15: 54
            Quote: Decimam
            The specific gravity of iron is 7,874 g / cm. cube (ICGSS unit), regardless of the steel obtained, in which iron is present.

            Pure iron - yes. But in real products there are also micropores, gas sinks, etc. By the way, Chernov proved that micropores arise during rolling in steel - therefore, if there are no gas sinks in the casting, then its density is even higher than that of rolled products!
            1. +1
              30 November 2018 15: 55
              Are we talking about iron or steel? Or do you not share these concepts?
              If we are talking about steel and products from it, then there is not specific gravity, but density.
              1. +1
                30 November 2018 16: 38
                Quote: Decimam
                there is not specific gravity, but density.

                In fact, the specific gravity is the ratio weight to volume. Thus, "in any system of units, the specific gravity is equal to the product of the density of the substance and the acceleration of gravity" (from pedivics).
                Temir formulated his thought not quite correct, but understandable enough. I agree that rude mistakes are necessary to be corrected - but there is no need to cling to trifles! We are talking about products of the same chemical composition (no matter iron, steel or bronze) - we are talking about density castings and rolled products not the material itself!
                1. +1
                  30 November 2018 17: 30
                  What is at stake, I understand. But I don’t cling to trifles, this technical education is to blame, it clings.
                  1. 0
                    30 November 2018 17: 32
                    Quote: Decimam
                    But I don’t cling to trifles, this technical education is to blame, it clings.

                    So I also have a technical one, and the profile one is a metallurgy smile
                    1. +1
                      30 November 2018 17: 35
                      I am a mechanic, mechanical equipment of metal plants. Maybe the mechanics are so harmful, I don’t know.
    2. +4
      30 November 2018 14: 25
      "For me, this is how the barrel was always cast. And what technology is there to forge a hollow tube on an anvil with a hammer and hammer in the 16th century?"
      Gun barrels, unlike cannon trunks, have never been cast. The technology of manufacturing the receiver is simple.

      A conventional (simple) barrel was made from a strip stock 32 inches (812,8 mm) long, 4 inches (101,6 mm) wide, 3/8 inch (9,525 mm) thick. After heating, this strip was bent by forging on a mandrel in such a way that its longitudinal edges adjoined to each other end-to-end, parallel to the axis of the bore. This joint was welded by the forge method and carefully forged. The long sides of a rectangular billet were sometimes driven "on a mustache" and welded not end-to-end, but overlapped.
      As the technology improved, in the sixteenth century, after welding and cooling, the trunks went through a four-sided sweep, turned on the lathe an external surface, which was then polished manually on a large circle made of soft sandstone.
      This technology remained for a very long time. If we take the book on editing the barrels of Lieutenant A. Korsakov (1861), then it describes the same operations for the manufacture of a gun barrel - 1) the manufacture of a barrel plate; 2) rolling it into a tube; 3) tube welding - obtaining a stem blank; 4) bore drilling; 5) turning the outer surface of the barrel.
      The threaded plugs in the rear of the barrel were not made at first. But since the powder pulp, which was then used, gave a lot of soot, the trunk had to be cleaned. The plug on the thread greatly facilitated this procedure.
      "The rifled barrel itself began to be manufactured in Europe in the 16th century."
      The exact date of occurrence of cuts in the trunk is unknown, most likely this happened in the second half
      XV century The earliest mention of rifles is in the register of the Turin Arsenal in 1476, and the second in the inventory of the arsenal of the Nuremberg Castle in 1479.
      In the first case, the weapon is described as "twisted iron", in the second case - with a "spiral-shaped edge". It is believed that in the second case, four barrels were made with edges forming spirals. Perhaps it is the rifling that is mentioned in the descriptions of the target shooting competitions made in Leipzig in 1498. A German gun, dating from about 1500, has traces of notches along the barrel.
  7. +3
    30 November 2018 14: 07
    In six months, 600 arquebuses were made on the island, which Totikata sold right there. And as a result, he not only enriched himself, but also contributed to its widespread distribution.

    Fernand Mendez Pinto claims that it was he who sold the first barrel to the yupps in 1543, but here he is probably lying - he liked to attribute to himself participation in all the notable events that he heard something about. But what he probably doesn’t lie about is that, having visited Japan 20 years later, he found out that on Tanegashima, following the model of this arquebus, as many as 20 thousand of them were riveted, and throughout Japan - more than a million!
    1. +3
      30 November 2018 18: 29
      Well, I got it. I’m just a curious medic and ran into metallurgists. But very much read and comprehended.
      1. +2
        2 December 2018 17: 20
        Quote: Tarkhan
        Well, I got it. I’m just a curious medic and ran into metallurgists. But very much read and comprehended.

        Well, yes, the site "VO" is rich in various surprises, here comments are often almost less informative than some articles.
  8. 0
    30 November 2018 16: 41
    Even under the USSR, I looked at the "Club of Travelers" in Japan, there is a "bullet holiday": they celebrate the day when they recognized a firearm. There I heard a slightly different interpretation - the legend: the prince was interested in the "weapons of the whites" and ordered his gunsmith to do the same, but the blacksmith did not hold this gun in his hands and made a model of the gun, even the barrel had a hole half the length of the barrel. The former "voluntarily" presented the prince with 2 guns. The blacksmith offered his daughter for the secret of the "fiery charge" and one Portuguese was seduced by the beauty and told. Allegedly, he stayed in Japan and made guns with his father-in-law. Soon a Portuguese merchant sailed to the island and offered to buy guns, and the Japanese showed him their guns.
    Who knows how it really was, but the Portuguese swam far and actively traded with the Japanese
    1. +1
      30 November 2018 20: 36
      In Japan, of course, there are many holidays, even Honen-matsuri, but about the "holiday of the bullet" - this is a casting, it seems.
  9. +2
    30 November 2018 18: 27
    In the movie Battle for Menring, Japanese sailors shell a Korean battleship with these guns. And from that hefty hand-made cooler, the bodyguards of Admiral Li Songsin were scattered on the armadillo’s bridge. In my opinion, a sniper gun was also present in the film. They also tried to shoot the Korean admiral.
    1. 0
      1 December 2018 01: 31
      So in the film, the Japanese handgun against the artillerymen (and part-time archers) - Koreans turned out to be powerless. hi
      1. -1
        1 December 2018 01: 47
        The sniper just flew into the eye.
  10. 0
    1 December 2018 15: 41
    An interesting article, but a few questions remain.
    Firstly, prejudices against guns have been going around for a very long time. It is full of even various stories, legends and other things, I don’t know what degree of reliability, showing the prejudice of the Japanese against strangers and their weapons. There are a lot of places where, if not ridiculed, then at least a man with a gun is opposed to the Japanese. And not only in this form, but also at the level of the country, regions. To what extent did this take place in history, how serious was it, if it is reflected even in modern retellings?
    Secondly, about the springs, I did not quite understand. After all, a steel spring can also be made softer, even without melting - to change the number of turns, its length, diameter.

    Well and further - it is very not clear about equestrian shooters. How massive was it in the troops and what was their training, compared to the rest? Offensive on a wide front, line retention requires very well trained horses and riders. Horseback riders do not need this, and it is not possible to have it, because of their peculiarity.

    And as usual, the confrontation of shell and armor. In Europe, many types of small arms did not penetrate armor well, especially at least at a sufficient distance. How was it in Japan, after all, arquebuses are a fairly light weapon?
    In the 16th century, fittings were already used in Europe, as in Japan with rifled weapons, and what type was it at that time if it was?
    And how effective were the shooting tactics? It is clear that this is not the 18th century with its perfect tactics and massive fire with a change of ranks.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"