Prospective weapons of the XXI century: what can they be?

81
What weapons will people fight, say, a quarter of a century later? Where will the development curve take them along this path, by what criteria will they be guided at that time sufficiently far from the present? Well, the most important question, why do we need it, will we need a weapon then? Global problems as they were, so will remain the same - uncontrolled population growth, and in poor countries exceeding that in the rich. Then the lack of food resources - clean water, meat, milk, flour, feed grain. Will be able to solve the food problem due to the intensification of agricultural production, well, for example, in-line growing chickens? The method has already been developed! In chickens, when a certain age is reached, the head is cut off - yes, they don’t need it, the air supply and nutrients of the tube are inserted into the cervical arteries and esophagus, and the sucker is hooked to the special stand . That is, he does not need to run, which reduces the space occupied by the chicks. Absolutely all physiological processes are controlled. By the way, the down and feathers from it fall off as superfluous, and we end up with a finished carcass, which we will only have to gut!

Prospective weapons of the XXI century: what can they be?

Martin Greer's carabine looks like this for now!



But ... whether it will solve the food problem, as well as the proposed disposal of pig manure in underground tanks, created by a nuclear explosion (!) Under salt layers? There are even more extravagant sentences, but they all contain many "would", which means they are quite far from reality.

Much more realistic is the assumption that people will continue to fight, but their weapons will increasingly depend on the dominant production technology. More recently, the dominant technology was the production of machine parts (and weapons!) On machine tools. Then it turned out that it was unprofitable to drive kg of steel into 5 chips in order to obtain a product weighing 900 grams and stamping and spot welding came to replace the cutting technology. Further - more: samples of the same small arms appeared, in which more and more parts are made of plastic. And already there is a speech and that in the 3D-press technology to do guns and automatic machines entirely. Why are there pistols ... grenade launchers and grenades for them, and even rockets and mines for mortars, are already trying to do on the 3D machines, and this works, although so far such “pleasure” is not cheap.

Well, what other trends exist today in the development of small arms, in addition to such a potential direction of its production, as printing 3D? After all, for the time being old samples are being printed that do not contain constructive novelties!

There are also some new items, and not all belong to the military field, but can be used in it. But let's start with the development of a purely military. It is reported that it is here in Russia that the development of hypersonic ammunition for handguns is about to be completed and this will be a revolution in weapons business. How they want to achieve this in the relevant press releases are not mentioned. At one time, the magazine “Technics of Youth” wrote that this is possible with the help of the so-called “gas shot”, in which not a gas pressure, but a shock wave in a gas, ejects a bullet. That is, the principle itself seems to be simple and clear. There is a tank, there is explosive and compressed inert gas in it, and a hole from the “tank” covers the bottom of the bullet. The charge is undermined, a shock wave arises in the gas, rushing at a tremendous speed, and here it just pushes the bullet out of the barrel. Such a principle will be implemented in this design or not - is still unknown. But the benefits are obvious: first of all, this is a long direct shot range and an increased penetrating power of the bullet. So to say, do not have time to blink, as you have already killed! Moreover, at a distance greater than is possible with the existing speed indicators of modern weapons.

Well - this all went well and sooner or later it should have ended. After all, in the middle of the XIX century, the speed of the bullet began to reach 400-500 m / s, and at the end of the rifle and machine guns, using smokeless powder, could ensure the speed of the bullets at the level of 700 - 800 m / s. Our “trilinek” had a speed of 865 - 870 m / s, the British rifle “Lee-Enfield” - 744 m / s, the Japanese “Arisaka” - 770 m / s. And this was considered to be a sufficient indicator, both for shooting at enemy infantry, and for defeating armored objects, but only when they were covered with thin armor. Lebel's rifle even had an initial speed of 610 – 700 m / s, but despite this it could hit group targets (as shown by the hostilities in Madagascar) even at a distance of 1800 m.! Our domestic sniper rifle CB-98 has a bullet speed equal to the speed of a three-line bullet and it is considered that this is enough for it to cope with “its duties”. The OSV-96 rifle has a caliber of 12,7-mm and a bullet speed, respectively, higher - 900 m / sec., But the target range is exactly the same as that of a Lebel rifle, however, fire from it is carried out on individual targets! That is, such a global trend as an increase in the speed of a bullet is evident today!

Another trend, however, is not directly related to weapons, it is ... electronic devices, rechargeable from the movement of the object on which (or in which) they are. It was reported that the United States DARPA Agency, known for its promising inventions, developed a device that generates electricity while in the pocket of a soldier. The soldier goes, the pendulum in the device oscillates and ... as a result, an electric current is generated, which goes to recharge the batteries "currents-wok" and other devices available to him. However, this is not today, but yesterday. Today we have created small devices without batteries in general, but which, nevertheless, are able to receive and reflect TV signals. According to Science News, scientists from the University of Washington have achieved an unprecedented breakthrough in the use of signals scattered in space. The new communication system differs from all existing ones in that it does not need external power wires or batteries for power supply. This technology has already received the name "ambient backscatter", which roughly can be translated as "using scattered signals." That is, in principle, this technology allows you to create a cartridge cartridge, in which there will be no batteries, but will be a microchip connected to the primer-igniter. Having received a signal from the outside transmitted by microwave radiation, this microchip will ignite the primer and, therefore, the munition itself. Which in turn avoids a hard mechanical connection between the chuck, bolt and drummer, beating on the primer. Ideally, this allows you to return ... to the guns loaded from the barrel of the XVII - XVIII centuries, but ... with a microchip in a burning case. You put it in the barrel, take aim and push the trigger, and the electronics do all the work for you!

And today multistep is becoming more and more popular. Recently, there were several reports in foreign media that, they say, very soon the Russians will have to fear not the M16 rifles, but weapons based on the innovative development of the American self-made Martin Martin Greer, who designed an automatic carbine with four to five barrels, and such a perfect system ammunition that he was destined to make a revolution in small arms of the XXI century.

What he did in the garage, and working at the Bed and Breakfast hotel in the city of Colorado Springs, in the US, does not frighten anyone. There, every work is considered honorable, if only you succeed. The prototype of this carbine was first shown at the SHOT 2018 arms exhibition in Las Vegas, and it was there that Pentagon experts showed an unexpected interest in this carbine. They saw in it, so to speak, a “fresh stream” in military invention. And indeed, there are a lot of differences from traditional structures in it. After all, it is a sleeveless, smooth-bore weapon, with an electromagnetic drive, which allowed the rate of fire of 250 to be achieved per second. Which, by the way, is also becoming a trend today, as it allows you to fire several bullets even before the shooter himself feels the impact of the shots. At the same time, Greer's carbine allows you to reach the speed of a bullet of the order of 3,5 Mach, that is, it will fly into the target three times faster than the speed of sound!

He received a patent for his development in 2016 year, and he spent 500 thousand dollars for the production of the current sample - a decent amount in all respects. By the way, after the Pentagon became interested in development, a rather delicate situation arose. Not only Greer himself, but many others expect that he will be able to return this money with a profit, otherwise no one else in the garage will create carbines. And the Pentagon runs the risk of losing potential self-taught voters, who happen to find diamonds in the mud. But to pay for something super-modern a lot of money is also reluctant. And how this spicy situation is resolved is not yet known.

Today, many developments are known, in which both gunpowder and bullet are placed separately, or the bullet and gunpowder are combined in the same ammunition, but ... it doesn’t have a sleeve at the same time. However, the design of Martin Greer is distinguished from them by the full automation of all the processes of reloading and firing, which are carried out on the basis of electromechanical devices. The traditional "mechanics", acting through the power of the shot, is not used.

On the carbine there is a special dispenser, which delivers gunpowder to the chamber, where the bullets are simultaneously inserted. Ignition of charges is carried out by an electric discharge, in all these operations the microprocessor built into the carbine is controlling.

The channels of the barrels are combined in the same block as in some samples of the 18th century multi-barreled weapons. At the same time, the weight-dimensional model of Greer weighs less than the rifle M16. That's just the presence of her battery power or battery causes many questions. Just as, incidentally, the protection of the microprocessor itself from the electromagnetic impulse of a nuclear explosion.

However, attention should be paid to something else, namely, indirectly, recognition by this very fact that the limit of perfection in mechanically driven weapons has been reached, and something fundamentally new is needed to transfer it to a new round of spiral development.

To be continued ...
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    1 December 2018 05: 59
    One thing is certain. Ways to kill people will become more technological, but killing will remain so. Earth is still far from peace and prosperity on the planet. hi
    1. +2
      1 December 2018 06: 19
      Earth is still far from peace and prosperity on the planet.

      So humanity is still in space torn with its moral flaws ... I hope civilizations of a higher order will look after this and humanity as well ... for you can not roughly put a Neanderthal into the hands of a grenade.
      1. 0
        1 December 2018 08: 42
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        civilizations of a higher order will keep an eye on this and even on humanity

        It is highly doubtful if these "civilizations" exist, then they will most likely try to colonize both the Earth and its population, using them in their own interests.

        We can see from our own experience that with the development of the so-called. "civilization", the moral qualities of the earthly population do not improve in the least, but on the contrary, the means and methods of enslavement and deprivation of material wealth are becoming more sophisticated.
        1. +1
          1 December 2018 10: 26
          It is highly doubtful if these "civilizations" exist, then they will most likely try to colonize both the Earth and its population, using them in their own interests.

          I am sure that they exist ... just as we are for ants for example ...
          and this does not mean that we will enslave ants ... they live their own lives, we are our own ... the main thing is not to harm each other with our activities.
        2. +1
          3 December 2018 07: 52
          It is highly doubtful if these "civilizations" exist

          the main evidence for the existence of more advanced aliens is that they have the intelligence not to contact us
    2. +4
      1 December 2018 09: 08
      Quote: morpogr
      One thing is certain. Ways to kill people will become more technological, but killing will remain so. Earth is still far from peace and prosperity on the planet.

      creation and destruction are the two pedals of the bike on which we ride.
      remove one and the movement will stop, alas.
  2. +2
    1 December 2018 09: 21
    Indeed, already in the middle of the 400th century, the bullet speed began to reach 500-700 m / s, but at the end of the rifle and machine guns, using smokeless gunpowder, they were able to ensure the speed of bullets at the level of 800 - 865 m / s. Our "three-line" had a speed of 870 - 744 m / s, the English rifle "Lee-Anfield" - 770 m / s, the Japanese "Arisaka" - XNUMX m / s. And it was considered quite sufficient

    Slightly boring) but in the time frame indicated by the author, "our three-line" had a muzzle velocity of 625 m / s, and 865_870 m / s after the adoption of cartridges with a bullet "L" in 1908
    1. +1
      1 December 2018 10: 14
      The volume of the article is limited to write "about all options".
  3. +3
    1 December 2018 10: 08
    Great review, dear Vyacheslav Olegovich! But I would not be so categorical. Some of the Pribluda described by you were invented 50 years ago ... and have not found any use in small arms, maybe because of the conservatism of users, maybe because of something else. And now, scientific progress and the designer sometimes go so crooked paths that for us, the humanities they are not something to explain, but difficult to understand ...
    Well, they already made a manual railgun, even though he knocks down beer cans by 5 meters. The first flash drive for a gig was from a matchbox, and after three years it was 8-16 gigabytes - nowhere is less, because you can’t take it with your fingers ...
    1. 0
      1 December 2018 10: 13
      I agree with you, but this is an attempt, and the attempt is not torture ... And then ... there will be a very interesting sequel!
      1. +2
        1 December 2018 10: 29
        Sometimes something else surprises ... here recently, in one science fiction (I love this), I came across a paradox. laser weapons - against howitzers ... And howitzers won ... precisely because of the mounted fire ... the lasers simply couldn’t get to the closed positions .... But this situation first developed back in 1904, when the Russian battery was closed positions spread several Japanese on a direct fire ... Indescribable ways of the mistress of history ...
  4. +1
    1 December 2018 10: 59
    The very weapons of mass destruction are Kalash and mortar. For more than 50 years, the Kalash has been trying to spoil the whole world and that's all. In the case of a kabzdets, a Kalash is needed, a bucket of ordinary cartridges and a tank of armor-piercing ones.
    1. +3
      1 December 2018 11: 26
      Quote: garri-lin
      The very weapons of mass destruction are Kalash and mortar. For more than 50 years, Kalash has been trying to spoil the whole world, and still nothing. In the case of a kabzdets, a Kalash is needed, a bucket of ordinary cartridges and a tank of armor-piercing ones.

      You are mistaken, the worst WMD is a club and a kitchen knife. from them the people perished and perishes much more. laughing
  5. +1
    1 December 2018 11: 00
    In chickens, a head is cut off when they reach a certain age - yes, they don’t need it, air tubes and nutrients are inserted into the cervical arteries and esophagus, and a suction tube in the back


    As I understand it, the author did not even hear about the growing popularity of synthetic meat ...
    Livestock farming will go down in history for the foreseeable future.
    The prospect of a "food crisis" is also no longer relevant for a long time, because it became clear to everyone that the transition to a post-industrial society marks a natural decline in the population.

    And on the topic, to me personally, the most promising development of personal weapons seems to be electric-powered rifles and telescopic ammunition (they have been tormented for a long time, but in medium calibers things have moved off the ground).
    1. 0
      1 December 2018 11: 37
      Real synthetic meat, based on cell cultures at the moment, although they have received it, but it costs so much ....
      1. +1
        1 December 2018 12: 03
        Really a little expensive, but not much more expensive than meat, it can already be purchased from us in vegan makreta.
        After mass distribution, they promise that the price will drop at times. Once GMO products were too expensive, but now they have almost replaced traditional cultures.
        1. +1
          1 December 2018 12: 44
          This is not something, rather the processing and modification of plant proteins. I myself am a cell culture operator, and now 1 million cells, and this is hardly a quarter of a match head, costs almost a thousand, so I do not hope to live to mass production ... but again, my post about flash drives.
    2. 0
      2 December 2018 04: 29
      Quote: Corn
      As I understand it, the author did not even hear about the growing popularity of synthetic meat ...
      Kin-Dza-Dza is waiting for us ...
  6. +3
    1 December 2018 11: 03
    When the chicks reach a certain age, their heads are cut off - yes, they don’t need it, air tubes and nutrients are inserted into the cervical arteries and esophagus, and a suction tube is inserted into the backside, after which the “chicken” is hung on a hook on a special stand .

    What is this game? The author, what, re-read the fiction? As for the Greer carbine, this is not a viable sample, especially in view of the use of electromechanics, why reinvent the wheel if systems with "traditional" automation have proven themselves perfectly. Moreover, huge capacities have been built for the production of classic ammunition. No one will put up with the possible losses, so the fate of the Greer carbine will be the same as that of the Australian Metal storm, an interesting sample, but nothing more. IMHO.
    At the same time, Greer’s carbine allows reaching a bullet speed of about 3,5 Machs, that is, it will fly at a target three times faster than the speed of sound!

    That is 1,155 m / s, oh yes, this is an unattainable line laughing laughing Mr. Shpakovsky apparently did not hear about the 5,6 x 39 Bloom cartridges, whose bullet speed is 1200 m / s, here it is "the weapon of the future." laughing hi
    1. +1
      1 December 2018 11: 17
      Quote: Rededi
      That is, 1,155 m / s, oh yes, this is an unattainable line. Mr. Shpakovsky apparently did not hear about 5,6 x 39 Bloom cartridges, the bullet speed of which is 1200 m / s, here it is "the weapon of the future."

      A little higher, the author has already unsubscribed: "The volume of the article is limited to write" about all options "- and you mulberry) overload the article with some Bloom)))
    2. +2
      1 December 2018 11: 32
      there is also a 0.17 remington cartridge, with a speed of up to 1300 m / s. But these cartridges also require higher quality (and expensive) barrel steels. So for the "leopards" there was a strict ban on the use of a high-speed cartridge for the BK-1 "running boar" rifle, due to increased barrel wear, or even destruction of rifling
      1. +1
        1 December 2018 11: 49
        to blame ... I lied to the brand of rifle, this is a series of MBO.
    3. 0
      1 December 2018 12: 43
      I had an article here about the Blum machine gun ... So I heard. But you won’t write about everything ...
      1. +1
        1 December 2018 12: 56
        There is a huge rate of fire, and not speed, the cartridge is 22LR. But this is so, from time to time we all let bubbles, sorry.
  7. +1
    1 December 2018 12: 04
    explosives and compressed inert gas, and the hole from the "tank" closes the bottom of the bullet. The charge is blown up, a shock wave arises in the gas, rushing at a tremendous speed

    I did not quite understand why a shock wave in a gas will be faster than expanding gases during the combustion of gunpowder.
    And how the explosions will affect the reliability and design of weapons.
    Portable multi-barrel weapons are also in doubt - this is overweight.
    Anyway, many of the samples of "weapons of the future" look too massive.
    Rather, it is believed that the weapons of the future will be taught to shoot with a time-smeared recoil, despite the fact that the weapon itself will become much easier and more compact.
    And the appearance of a homing path is also a promising direction.
    Other directions that are seen are active-reactive bullets, a minimum of two-caliber weapons, the appearance of high-power explosives, so that it is possible to combine bullets with grenades.
    1. +2
      1 December 2018 20: 09
      The speed of a missile projectile depends on the speed of sound in the expanding gas in the barrel. The products of combustion of gunpowder have a very large molar mass, so it is impossible to obtain speeds higher than 1,5 - 2 km / s on gunpowder in principle. Ballistic stands use the so-called light-gas guns, consisting of a number of steps. The first stage is an ordinary gun (at the Institute of Mechanics of Moscow State University it is KS-19), firing a plastic projectile at a smaller caliber barrel mated to the original barrel, filled with helium or hydrogen. The projectile is deformed, penetrates into the smaller barrel and creates a shock wave in the light gas, which pushes the model onto the measuring track at speeds up to 5 - 6 km / s.
  8. 0
    1 December 2018 12: 44
    Quote: Avior
    why a shock wave in a gas will be faster than expanding gases during the combustion of gunpowder.

    I do not know either. But what I read, I wrote about ...
    1. +1
      1 December 2018 15: 18
      well, theoretically it can be assumed that explosives detonate and release energy faster than gunpowder burns.
      but it will be a sharp increase in the load on all elements of the weapon.
      1. +2
        1 December 2018 23: 36
        This is called a detonation wave. It always propagates at supersonic speed. Unlike deflagration, it’s just burning. The burning of gunpowder in small arms or artillery is a deflagration process. They try to avoid detonation in a cartridge (shell). Because in this case the load on the weapon becomes excessive and either immediately disables the weapon or leads to very rapid wear.
        Detonation processes are used just in explosives. For example, as a filling of shells. Here the excessive speed of the explosion is only a plus. Try stuffing cartridges with toloma, C4, or RDX. When fired, you will not be able to hit the target - they will open a bullet in the barrel, after which it will break the receiver or the barrel. It happens even from gunpowder. And even from BB and even more so.
        The deflagration combustion of gunpowders has a speed of about 2 km / s.
        And the detonation wave velocity in industrial explosives is 2.5-6.5 km / s, TNT - 7 km / s, RDX - 8.1 km / s, nitroglycerin - 7.7-8.2 km / s (according to various sources), etc.

        The use of explosives for a propellant charge in a firearm is possible. But completely impractical. Because:
        1. It is necessary to strengthen inadequately other operational characteristics, which means to make the construction heavier and more expensive.
        2. In this case, there will be very fast wear on the bore. Because such pressures are already quite comparable with the yield strengths of even very strong and hard alloys.
  9. +4
    1 December 2018 16: 13
    "Well, for example, raising chickens in line? The method has already been developed! In chickens, upon reaching a certain age, the head is cut off - yes, they do not need it, tubes supplying air and nutrients are inserted into the cervical arteries and the esophagus, and a tube is inserted into the butt. suction, after which the "chicken" is hung on a hook on a special stand. "
    Vyacheslav Olegovich, here not everyone has a sufficient sense of humor and can take your inertia at face value. Probably they read about Mike’s chicken or did they remember Professor Dowell’s head? And the continuous raising of chickens with the vivisetism described by you has nothing in common.
    As for Greer, in the American "blogosphere" there is a humor about his super rifle.
    Here the Americans are hostages of their own traditions and are forced to react to all kinds of investments in garbage dumps, even if they really are not worth a broken cent, but certainly not because "the limit of excellence in power-operated weapons has been reached"
    Have you heard about the principle of sufficient reason?
  10. 0
    1 December 2018 19: 07
    The immediate future is the widespread use of plastics and high-strength light metals to reduce weight. 1,5 kg M-16 is already a reality. What will be the firepower of the unit, equipped with machine guns made of such materials? )))
  11. +1
    1 December 2018 19: 59
    in which the bullet is not emitted by gas pressure, but by a shock wave in the gas. That is, the principle itself seems to be simple and understandable. There is a tank, it contains explosives and compressed inert gas, and the hole from the "tank" closes the bottom of the bullet. The charge is blown up, a shock wave arises in the gas, rushing at a tremendous speed, and here it just pushes the bullet out of the barrel.

    The style of a political worker is felt. The author does not know that light-gas guns are widely used on ballistic stands from the 50 of the last century to the present. In the 60-s there were experimental studies of this principle for military guns, which gave a negative result.
    1. 0
      1 December 2018 22: 24
      This was an assumption, since our sources regarding hypersonic ammunition did not say why this speed would be obtained.
  12. +2
    1 December 2018 20: 02
    Devices recharged from movement, this is not even yesterday, but the day before yesterday. Remember the mechanical clock with a pendulum. They have been around for forty years. Just to the general public, it is presented as an innovation. For the charging of household phones and e-books has not yet been applied.
    The microchips used in weapons, as well as shellless ammunition, have a significant drawback. They are able to fail when using irradiation of a certain wavelength. As is known, quartz micro plates are widely used in microchips. Grown in laboratories, with the given parameters. They fail when exposed to specific wavelengths.
    But Greer's development is really interesting. If you provide protection from electromagnetic radiation from the outside, you can get a device worthy of attention.
    If the ruling elite had a desire in Russia, many fundamentally new things could have arisen for a long time. And not only in the military sphere. The trouble is (and by the way, not only in Russia) that people in power are not fighting for progress in general, but for superiority over opponents. And most of all they are interested in power, benefits and money))
    Thank! Good review.
    1. +3
      1 December 2018 20: 52
      "Remember the mechanical pendulum clock. It has been around for forty years."
      Obviously you did not mean the pendulum, but the automatic winding. The Swiss watchmaker Abraham-Lewis in 1770 for the first time in a Swiss watch used a self-winding movement.
      1. +1
        1 December 2018 21: 48
        Yes you are right. Just put it wrong. And I mean the very mass, continuous production of such watches. Thanks for the amendment)
        1. +2
          1 December 2018 22: 56

          This watch is 83 years old. They are coming. The Swiss company Alpha, from the most ordinary, inexpensive, disappeared in the 70s, quartz crushed. Almost all pre-war models are automatic.
          Now Hong Kong has bought the rights to the brand.
          1. 0
            2 December 2018 06: 12
            You are talking a little about different things: the classic automatic winding in the watch accumulates energy in the flywheel, and the Japanese have made the Kinetic mechanism, which converts the energy of the pendulum into electrical energy and recharges the quartz in the watch.
            Sincerely.
            1. +1
              2 December 2018 10: 13
              Kinetic mechanism is no different from the classic automatic winding.
              The Kinetic movement is a symbiosis of a quartz watch and a self-winding mechanical watch. During hand movements, a load similar to that in a self-winding watch rotates around its axis and rotates the generator rotor instead of a spring plant through a gear system. The electric current generated by the generator charges the energy storage device - a capacitor.
              A significant difference is the characteristics of the gear transmission.
              In order for the generator to generate the current of the required voltage, the rotor must rotate at high speed. Therefore, in a mechanical watch, a wheel drive from the winding load to the drum reduces speed, and in Kinetic, vice versa.
              1. 0
                2 December 2018 11: 53
                Perhaps you are more accurate. But the Japanese have worked out this issue with this mechanism in practice. It remains to implement it on phones))
                1. +3
                  2 December 2018 12: 24
                  Already implemented - M2E Power. And besides this, there are a dozen more methods, including thermal resonators, triboelectric nanogenerators and charges based on the technology of biological semiconductors.
            2. +1
              2 December 2018 14: 25
              There are technologies that are more advanced and simpler at the same time. Only they are secret. Therefore, I will not write about them, but only hint. Remember the standalone eavesdropping devices? For example, mounted in a wooden eagle, once donated by the pioneers to the US ambassador to the USSR. Inside the board, in absolute darkness, there is a small device, without any external sources. accumulates information and periodically "shoots" it on the air. What do you think, what kind of source can provide the operation of such equipment? And for many years! And these technologies are already over 60 years old. But look for the answers yourself))
              1. +2
                3 December 2018 01: 42
                There is no source of energy, it is not needed there. This is called an endovibrator. This is no longer a secret.
                The devices consist of a re-emitting antenna loaded on a resonant system with parameters changing under the influence of acoustic vibrations (a resonant circuit with nonlinear elements or a volume resonator). The resonance system tunes to the frequency of the irradiating signal.
                The endovibrator acts as a secondary emitter. The level of the reradiated signal is directly proportional to the effective scattering area of ​​the endovibrator, which depends on its electrical properties, geometric dimensions and spatial orientation. A periodic change in any of these parameters under the influence of acoustic vibrations leads to amplitude or phase modulation of the reflected signal.
                Thus, when the endovibrator is irradiated with a high-frequency harmonic signal, the latter generates secondary radio waves during the interaction of the irradiating electromagnetic field with the antenna, that is, re-emission (secondary radiation) of the signal occurs. Changing the parameters of a resonant system or a cavity resonator under the influence of an acoustic speech signal causes a change in the reflective properties of the antenna, which leads to modulation of the reflected radio signal.
                In endovibrators based on volume resonators or resonance lines, the role of a microphone (a receiver of acoustic vibrations) and a modulator is played by a movable diaphragm.
                A thin metal membrane or a thin layer of electrically conductive liquid at the bottom of the resonator can be used as a diaphragm. The change in the reflective properties of the antenna connected to the resonator occurs due to a change in the quality factor or resonant frequency of the resonator caused by the movement of the diaphragm under the influence of acoustic vibrations.
                (Source "Broadband recorder of secondary radiation modulation" Revision - 1800 ": technical description.")
                So the question is interesting, but off topic.
                1. +1
                  3 December 2018 09: 36
                  Frankly speaking, my level of knowledge in radio and electrical engineering is more superficial. But as far as I know, in such devices, up to micro sizes, a flat acoustic current generator is used. That’s why I think it’s all the same. The device itself generates electricity, accumulates in the capacitor, without any use of a battery. And given that fluctuations and movements around are constant, the device is rarely completely de-energized. In fact, a perpetual electric motor.
                  1. +2
                    3 December 2018 10: 31
                    The device we are discussing does not produce electricity. It simply modulates (changes) the electromagnetic waves incident on it. About the endogenerator is even in Wookupedia.
                    1. +1
                      3 December 2018 12: 36
                      We have diverted from the topic quite far. I just wanted to say that there are micro devices that are useful to humans. The current for their work must come from somewhere. And, if built into a watch it can be powered from the same automatic winding, then sealed in an ashtray, it must generate electricity for its work on its own. If you knew how simple the circuit of a modern micro-eavesdropping device is sometimes, you would gasp. What you described is applicable to devices the size of a home landline telephone speaker. Of course, these are also found, but they are already moving away. But back to the topic of the article. All the devices presented here, including those by subscribers, are very complex, expensive and cannot be used in mass infantry weapons. First, in the event of a major war, the factories will be quickly destroyed and only small semi-handicraft workshops will remain. Secondly, as modern wars show, it is expensive and time-consuming to train personnel for such enterprises, and civilians often die in large numbers and quickly in large wars. As a result, having trained a number of such specialists, they cannot be called up to the front as reservists, otherwise the enterprise will stand up, there will be no one to replace them. Thirdly, in view of the above reasons, the weapon itself turns out to be expensive and difficult to maintain. It will no longer be possible to entrust him to a fighter, just with a secondary education. The war is a meat grinder, where the "Solntsepёk" left, fired a volley and there was no company of soldiers, or even two. The country will quickly go broke on the loss of such highly educated soldiers and weapons on high technology. And fourthly, where is all this to be repaired? Today, every division has field repair shops. In them you can recruit any locksmiths who graduated from vocational schools and technical schools. And, if they cope with the repair of tractors, cars and sewing machines, they can also cope with the repair of weapons. And who will fix the high-tech weapons listed in this article? A whole wagon of such broken rifles will accumulate in the warring division, and what to do with them? Drive to an underground high-tech plant, through half a destroyed country or what? That's what i mean
                      1. +1
                        3 December 2018 13: 26
                        Are you all getting ready for a world war? As for me, the most destructive weapon today is the TV. The brain immediately destroys in such a way that it no longer perceives the real picture of the world. And in combination with the Internet and other media, this is generally an Armageddian, which we observe. Okay, I'll go to matches and check the salt, and probably the soap. Just in case, if half the country is destroyed, there will definitely not be soap.
                      2. +1
                        3 December 2018 15: 20
                        Yes, and don’t talk. The TV has completely crazy people. And you are right, along with modern media and the Internet, just a small armageddean)) I hope you have a lot of soap and matches. If not, you should run to buy. But seriously, remember the human story confidently set forth by historians over the previous 6 of thousands of years, and what is the time when people did not fight? And at what times, among the living, were not any empires destroyed or plundered? And get an answer to your doubts)) All the best!
                      3. +2
                        3 December 2018 21: 03
                        This is complete nonsense! Repairing weapons on the battlefield is nonsense of even greater dreamers than those who create new weapons. Now no one can fix the machine, except for specialists, most of the modern youth are "specialists of the big balts" :) or "button cams with experience". And after ten years, they will not fix the tractor, the samovar. Everything is based on simple and reliable modules that are like spare parts and are changed block by block. What slums you got out of with your vocational school specialists.?
                      4. +2
                        3 December 2018 22: 08
                        I got out of the Russian slums. If you have heard, or maybe in transit, have been to such an organization as the army, you probably met there units called repair brigades. Of course, replacements come from factory spare parts, or from other interchangeable samples for repair. Overall, thanks for the clarification. Mr obvious))
                      5. +1
                        4 December 2018 11: 54
                        Not only saw, but also led such units! And I assure you, it is not difficult to teach a block to change, and what buttons to poke on a piece of paper. But to handle weapons correctly, the task is sometimes more difficult, and every year it becomes more difficult. Electronics will help to create more advanced protection of weapons from the "Fool" (fatigue, inattention). This is called ASBU weapons!
                      6. 0
                        4 December 2018 14: 05
                        Then let's dwell on the fact that time will tell which of us is right)) Moreover, the next decade. And so that my position is completely understandable and does not cause associations with doublethinking and double standards, I will say the following: I am not a retrograde and not at all against progress. On the contrary, with all my thoughts for! But so far I have never seen a promising infantry weapons system that fits into three words: Reliably, Massovo, Cheap!
                        Basically, everything offered is structurally much more complicated, an order of magnitude, if not more expensive, and reliability comparable to AK is a big question. So what are waiting))
                      7. 0
                        6 December 2018 19: 03
                        How to achieve reliability if not manufactured? :) And how much is cheap? You can wait as long as you want, but we cannot wait another ten years! Because, so that in ten years it would be "reliable" (at least), we must at least do something today ..... No one questions the reliability of "Koloshmat", but only one request, let them make an automatic machine that with one button, it was guaranteed to be brought into a discharged (non-hazardous) position, without losing ammunition, that's all.
                      8. 0
                        6 December 2018 19: 54
                        Since itching in some place, this is not for me) And as far as I remember, in Ak that same reliability was laid in the process of development and testing, before being adopted) It follows that please try to finish it, without any significant parties. Small trial series. Cheap - this is the cost of AK, plus a maximum of the same price premium, given the more modern product. The price above is no longer related to cheapness. And, if it’s still more expensive, then let the bullets catch up with the enemy themselves. He is around the corner and they are behind him. Then the price is justified. I already described here 100% premium for a new sample. And I would like to see the new product also increase its combat qualities in the same percentage. That is, 100% is better in all respects than AK.
                        Once the head and hands itch, so work!)) But with this correspondence, we pour from empty to empty water))
                      9. -1
                        30 December 2018 13: 23
                        what kind of retrograde you are, you are directly an enemy of market progress, you look at the prices of the most democratic aircraft carriers and planes and other related products, and you are talking about cheaper and more reliable. Progress, you know, requires sacrifice and more, more.
                      10. -1
                        30 December 2018 13: 15
                        I note that simultaneously with the complication of "gadgets", there is a process of simplification of use, such as a "friendly" or intuitive interface, in the limit you can wait for the user's intellect of a monkey. Another trend. The herd of horses yesterday is a small engine today. At home today you can do a lot of things that used to be done in factories. For example, 3D printing. You can put the printer in your own shed.
              2. 0
                3 December 2018 02: 12
                No need to fantasize about an eagle.
                He did not accumulate anything and did not "shoot" wink
                He worked quietly in real time, modulating the reflected signal a little, which he was irradiated from the house opposite. hi
                1. 0
                  3 December 2018 12: 46
                  Perhaps you are right, and there is just a device that reflects incoming signals. But it worked for several years. It turns out that the embassy's counterintelligence service, obliged to ensure security from electronic wiretapping, was just dozing all this time? If the signal goes constantly, it is a matter of technology and the direct responsibility of the embassy security service! I thought the enemies of the USSR were much smarter and more vigilant. But here the usual "mirror" could not be detected for a long time)
                  1. +1
                    3 December 2018 13: 32
                    Do you think that the embassy scans the entire range of existing frequencies? When Theremin developed the device, all this technique was in its infancy.
                    The search for devices focused on well-known samples, respectively, in the range on which the device worked, there were not even scanners. And only on the urgent advice of the defector revealed the frequency range of the device. And constantly no one turned it on.
                    1. 0
                      3 December 2018 15: 30
                      You are most likely right. I do not know how the embassies are guarded, but I assumed that a very wide range of radio frequencies is being scanned there. With this eagle, I just picked the wrong example. But I had nothing to compare with. That's why I stopped at the eagle. The device I mentioned in an ashtray, of a different type, may by its own ways end up somewhere far from the city, on the veranda of a government dacha. Every stump and bush in the surrounding forest is well known to the guard. There you will definitely not place a station giving a signal to the device. The "bug" will have to go on the air on its own.
          2. +1
            2 December 2018 07: 43
            Nice ones. and most importantly, nothing more. Is this a self-winding watch, or an ordinary one? Do you understand the strap as modern? Old skin would have dried out without special care. And how much behind, or in a hurry, per day, per week?))
            1. +1
              2 December 2018 12: 14
              Self-winding. Accuracy is usual for mechanics of this class plus age - plus / minus 30-40 seconds per day. The strap, of course, is modern.
  13. +3
    1 December 2018 20: 15
    Vyacheslav, technology is not yours. Write about the ancient world, there you get better.
    1. +2
      1 December 2018 20: 47
      Already how much I try to convince of the same - nothing.
      1. 0
        1 December 2018 22: 25
        This is only the beginning, then there will be more. However, it is said: truth is born as heresy, but dies as prejudice.
    2. 0
      1 December 2018 22: 28
      So I write ... Constantly ...
  14. +1
    1 December 2018 20: 25
    On the carbine there is a special dispenser, which delivers gunpowder to the chamber, where the bullets are simultaneously inserted. Ignition of charges is carried out by an electric discharge, in all these operations the microprocessor built into the carbine is controlling.

    Battery Harvester.
    1. 0
      1 December 2018 22: 28
      The question, Vladimir, is completely different. Martin spent 500000 bucks. Will he return them with a profit or not? That's just what matters and smart people understand it well.
      1. +3
        1 December 2018 23: 01
        "This is the only thing that matters"
        Of course he does, he did most of the work. People demand money back.
      2. Lad
        +2
        2 December 2018 00: 03
        It is clear that this site is entertaining and jokes are suitable for this as well as possible. And the jokes about sawing bucks in America is finally the quintessence. ))) And they do not mind even 90% of the article and its discussion materials. I do not mind this situation at all. )) But I would like somewhere in the brief breaks between jokes at least a little more information about promising weapons. At least some schemes, descriptions, test results, specifications ... well, at least something else. (If possible, of course.)
      3. 0
        2 December 2018 02: 39
        Quote: kalibr
        Will he return them with a profit or not?

        I doubt it. Judging by the description, a very complex design has turned out.
  15. +1
    1 December 2018 23: 51
    Well, 500 thousand. Greer spent on the development and construction of a prototype. Another thing is interesting, but how much will the American treasury cost in-line production of these products? That is the whole question. How many times will this weapon be more expensive than the same old M-16? And, in this case, is the game worth the candle? hi
  16. Lad
    +1
    1 December 2018 23: 56
    And why are you so bent on the fact that in a future war, EMR will damage some chips in the machine? And what, therefore, needs a promising machine without electronics? But the machine is an auxiliary weapon. Now, and even more so in the future, more powerful devices will be at war: airplanes, tanks, guns, I am silent about all kinds of missiles there. All of them will be stuffed with all kinds of chips to the eyeballs. And now what? Disarm all control systems and all these weapons? Of course not. Chips are an indispensable element of any weapon of the future and you can’t get anywhere from this. No need to think in terms of trilinear. Well ... maybe some knife models will be without chips. But how much will they gain?
    1. 0
      2 December 2018 06: 59
      Great comment!
    2. 0
      2 December 2018 23: 51
      Yes, a good comment and questions are correct) EMP greatly complicates the design of weapons. Plus, the differences in pressure and weather (rain, snow, high humidity in the jungle and in the swamps, etc.) In the end, it’s just a mistreatment, due to physical exhaustion and moral fatigue. And we arrived. The device will simply fail at the most inopportune moment. Already since the First World War, the main share of losses, the parties suffered from artillery and aircraft. Let's ignore the global nuclear conflict and take a low-intensity war. For example, modern Syria with its civil war. Structurally, the systems used are already brought to a high degree of perfection. Like hand weapons, the tanks, planes and missiles you mentioned. But, as it turned out, the experience of Vietnam was very useful in the Middle East. Namely, a normal war. Kilometers of tunnels are dug deep underground. Some are destroyed and right there, new ones are dug up every day. And imagine, Aircraft, tanks and missiles, in these conditions were not very effective. The SSA soldiers had to go through and examine everything with their feet, hands and machine guns.
      And then, you apparently forgot the tests carried out within the framework of NATO, in the late 90s of the last century. Under Bore-drinking, several special missiles were removed from the warehouses of the ZGV in an unknown direction. Their impact on enemy equipment is based on explosive magnetic generators created on the basis of special, artificially grown crystals. The accuracy of processing of which exceeds the same in diamonds by 200 (!) Times. And as far as I remember now, one or two missiles were from the late 70s, and 4 more, from the early 80s. And so the NATO members launched it, and measured the impulses of impact on the aviation group in the air. The conclusions were sad for NATO: “Missiles 15 years old and older will simply“ drop ”their planes from the sky, knocking out the onboard electronics.
      I admit that you did not know about this. But search the internet. This information is now in the public domain. So it's not about three-line thinking. But in addition to the above factors, we will have to remember that CHIPs will need to be protected with reliable screens, from the very EMP. And here you can't get off with aluminum pieces of iron. Thick cermet will be required (most likely). And this is a "dead weight" that a soldier needs to carry on his weapon. If you've ever worn an old metal-ceramic body armor, you will understand me. When a soldier goes into battle, he throws out everything unnecessary and heavy, gaining more cartridges and grenades. For, if they run out, it will remain to throw stew at the enemy, or go hand-to-hand. How this ends in modern warfare, we remember from the 30 Wagner soldiers killed by the banned ISIS fighters.
      I do not like to chew, but there seems to be no choice.
  17. +2
    3 December 2018 11: 19
    When Mr. Maxim offered his machine gun, "Military Experts" argued that there is a shortage of water in the desert, and in winter it will freeze! 350 pcs. made only in Russia from 000 to 1910. and around the world of various modifications under a million! Electricity is now in every hole, but the sect ala "Kalashmata" has existed for over 45 years, and all weapons are created for the war of 70 years. About radiation, in general, longing, semiconductors will survive any soldier, after microwave radiation, and where do you find so much energy on the battlefield that would affect each rifle. When the conversation comes about an electro-mechanical rifle, then the designers-gunsmiths (pro, 45 years of experience !!!) start hysterical, spit and beat on the floor in convulsions :) sectarians However !!
    1. 0
      3 December 2018 14: 08
      But then, as always, we will catch up!
  18. -1
    30 December 2018 15: 12
    Well yes. The author is clearly not a luminary and the article does not even hold a doctorate, but how prompted "Herzenov", a bug! It’s a pity that I didn’t irritate anyone. It turned out that the mind is good, but much better, but not always and not much. Nevertheless, thanks to everyone who did not disdain with their three kopecks, it was interesting and somewhere informative.
  19. +1
    3 January 2019 01: 05
    Guys, an American created a weapon of the past in his garage !!! Why? what His weapon is smooth-bore, five-shot, muzzle-loading, there is no unitary cartridge, there is no capsule. There are five trunks, and what caliber? A typical wick shotgun is with an electromagnetic wick, and which powder is black or smokeless? Want to recharge from a TV signal somewhere near Kandahar. good Charge walkie currents when walking in the RIA, the Red Army yes - does the United States Army have the concept of a march throw or not? How many miles, miles, miles do you need to go to fully charge - is running in place suitable? A rate of 250 per minute is 50 charges of 5, how much can you personally from a prone position? what Bullets separately - a bullet is attached, but a powder magazine? The firing range from a smooth barrel is what, remember the Crimean War. To clean 5 trunks - soldiers will be grateful to you. am How is the misfire problem solved? The creator spent $ 500 on development - there was no need to bite a five-star cognac with black caviar! A lot of questions - who will answer in case of failure in the ongoing war or will have to rearm the campaign? hi
    1. 0
      11 February 2019 13: 48
      Kitty ... Without seeing a sample, just a brief mention, criticizing is simply pointless. I agree with the author that the mechanical stems of small arms have come to the edges for improvement, and for development, new approaches and principles are needed. That electro-ignition of a charge should have been introduced yesterday, as well as the replacement of gunpowder with another propellant, has long been understood, but reserves, inertia, and other things slow down. Dosage at the place of the propellant is a controversial decision, after all, a finished shot is preferable over everything ... Giving a bullet due to rifling the barrel and cutting soft metal should also be replaced by a more suitable material from plastics, etc., which will eliminate overheating and barrel wear, etc. The field of activity is vast, but so far we see our main manufacturers of small arms in the design and minor side-work of the old models ...
  20. 0
    12 January 2019 19: 33
    We can say one thing there is no limit to perfection. Surprised by another, it turns out that in the "light of democracy and law" the military does not want to pay inventors, which does not prevent them from using the inventions themselves.