Military Review

The Central Bank of the Russian Federation decided to conduct explanatory work with Chinese banks on the issue of sanctions

36
The head of the representative office of the Bank of Russia in China, Vladimir Danilov, reported on the appeal that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation submitted to the National Bank of the People's Republic of China. The appeal is due to the fact that a number of Chinese commercial banks decided to join the anti-Russian sanctions. The argument of commercial banks in China is as follows: if you do not connect to the sanction regime, it can be extended to the Chinese banks themselves.




The representative office of the Bank of Russia decided to clarify to the Chinese that those "do not correctly interpret the sanctions regime." Statement by Vladimir Danilov leads RIA News:
Two days ago, this problem was solved. The Bank of Russia sent a clarification to the People’s Bank of China, the People’s Bank of China, in turn, brought the content of these explanations to our commercial banks. There are a number of problems related to the fact that a number of Chinese commercial banks extensively interpret the restrictive measures that are applied to Russia.


Danilov noted that Western sanctions do not impose restrictions on the movement of funds by banks that are not on the sanction lists. According to the representative of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, the sanctions may concern individual representatives of Russian banks or individual Russian banks, but this does not mean that the sanctions need to be automatically extended, as some Chinese commercial credit organizations do.

At the forum, which is held by the Moscow and Shanghai stock exchanges, Vladimir Danilov noted that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and the National Bank of the People's Republic of China agreed to hold ongoing consultations on this issue.

Recall that earlier, some commercial banks in China declared they were not ready to continue lending to Russian banks because of the sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union.
Photos used:
https://ru.depositphotos.com
36 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 21 November 2018 06: 22
    +6
    And I always said that the Chinese are just opportunists and cowards, from those `` friends '' that are no better than enemies.
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 21 November 2018 06: 40
      +20
      Quote: ANCIENT
      And I always said that the Chinese are just opportunists and cowards, from those `` friends '' that are no better than enemies.

      Is it better with us? Crimean not every Russian bank will serve.
      1. Underwater hunter
        Underwater hunter 21 November 2018 06: 48
        +7
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Quote: ANCIENT
        And I always said that the Chinese are just opportunists and cowards, from those `` friends '' that are no better than enemies.

        Is it better with us? Crimean not every Russian bank will serve.

        Indeed, first of all, Gref needs to be clarified .. As for the Chinese .. then my opinion is they are not friends to us .. Here the Americans are eager to fight on two fronts, I still do not see two fronts, I see one, they’re sticking to Russia .. and the role of the Chinese in this whole story is dubious .. and neither friend nor foe, according to circumstances, but circumstances are not in our favor ..
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 21 November 2018 07: 00
          +4
          Quote: Underwater Hunter
          As for the Chinese .. then my opinion is that they are not friends to us.

          There’s nothing to be our friends with. That Americans are capitalists, that we are. Correctly Kuzya remarked:
          Quote: Kuzya the Cat
          Their chairman, with a smile, has already explained the reason for such a "partnership" - "the trade turnover between China and the United States is $ 700 billion, and between China and Russia is only $ 60 billion ... thus, it is easy to understand who is for China "strategic" partner

          To be friends with the Americans is much more profitable.
          And we still climb somewhere. We want to produce an airplane in cooperation with them ... We forgot, probably, that in cooperation with China, Swedes, French, Americans, and Japanese began to produce cars. Now China has its own auto industry. It seems to me that it will be so with the plane. And they will send us, as the Japs were sent, when they were excited because of the islands.
          1. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 21 November 2018 07: 34
            +2
            By the way, the Chinese auto industry began to build the USSR. The first Chinese car came off in the 53 year. Copy of ZIS-150. sad
        2. Altona
          Altona 21 November 2018 07: 59
          +4
          Quote: Underwater Hunter
          Indeed, the first thing you need to explain to Gref is ..

          -------------------------------------
          Gref and his associates do not need this. Russia is only a place of work for them and nothing more. Their children, relatives, they themselves have long been in the West.
        3. max702
          max702 21 November 2018 08: 08
          +2
          Quote: Underwater Hunter
          Indeed, the first thing you need to explain to Gref is ..

          But how will he then wash the money? He will then have to close all branches abroad, and this is the main way of withdrawing capital and its main margin and concern .. Ask what interest he gives loans over the hill .. There are tears, but the count holds for this possibility, he doesn’t give a damn about direct instructions GDP! And we are talking about the Chinese ..
        4. Mr Credo
          Mr Credo 21 November 2018 08: 11
          0
          Are the Chinese not our friends? And who are they to us? Partners? Can we introduce a ban on trade with China? The consequences to predict? How will we live without Aliexpress? Well and so on.
          1. Narak-zempo
            Narak-zempo 21 November 2018 09: 42
            0
            Quote: Mister Creed
            Are the Chinese not our friends? And who are they to us? Partners? Can we introduce a ban on trade with China? The consequences to predict? How will we live without Aliexpress? Well and so on.

            If for the Chinese we are a source of cheap raw materials and a sales market (rather feeble compared to the American one, but at least something), then is this a reason to talk about "friendship"? Well, yes, about the same friendship had European countries with their African colonies in the Victorian era.
            1. major147
              major147 21 November 2018 10: 39
              0
              Quote: Narak-zempo
              Quote: Mister Creed
              Are the Chinese not our friends? And who are they to us? Partners? Can we introduce a ban on trade with China? The consequences to predict? How will we live without Aliexpress? Well and so on.

              If for the Chinese we are a source of cheap raw materials and a sales market (rather feeble compared to the American one, but at least something), then is this a reason to talk about "friendship"? Well, yes, about the same friendship had European countries with their African colonies in the Victorian era.

              That is, the fact that China is buying from us the most advanced weapons in the world is "not about anything" for you?
              1. Narak-zempo
                Narak-zempo 21 November 2018 12: 00
                +1
                Quote: major147
                That is, the fact that China is buying from us the most advanced weapons in the world is "not about anything" for you?

                I don’t know much about weapons, but I know that taiga leaves there in the form of a round timber.
                1. major147
                  major147 21 November 2018 12: 03
                  0
                  Quote: Narak-zempo
                  Quote: major147
                  That is, the fact that China is buying from us the most advanced weapons in the world is "not about anything" for you?

                  I don’t know much about weapons, but I know that taiga leaves there in the form of a round timber.

                  That is yes. But the S-400 and others like them also go.
      2. ANCIENT
        ANCIENT 21 November 2018 07: 02
        +1
        Mordvin 3-Vladimir hi -so this is because of the abundance of liberals in power, literally praying to the usa and the other west negative
        1. Altona
          Altona 21 November 2018 08: 00
          +7
          Quote: ANCIENT
          so this is because of the abundance of liberals

          ---------------------------------
          Let's call a spade a spade, it's collaborators, not liberals at all.
      3. zyzx
        zyzx 21 November 2018 07: 17
        +1
        Quote: Mordvin 3
        Is it better with us? Crimean not every Russian bank will serve.

        We have a type of capitalism, but they have the general line of the party. So we’ll think about what and where it’s general. Without us, China will face another opium war and all the nonsense after it ...
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 21 November 2018 07: 54
          +1
          Quote: zyzx
          .without us, China is waiting for the next opium war and all the nonsense after it ..

          You have megalomania. In China, the fleet has already overtaken Japan in terms of tonnage, and in terms of personnel - the United States. And he already launches rockets into space more than us. So, I would think hard, and who is stronger at the moment? Economically - they, numerically - they, their special forces steadily occupies the first places.
          1. zyzx
            zyzx 21 November 2018 08: 26
            +1
            Quote: Mordvin 3
            You have megalomania.

            Yes, I don’t have megalomania, only knowledge of history, all the neighbors of the Chinese, including the smallest Mongols and the Japanese, turned and what Western democracies did with the Chinese. The only thing is that when China achieved militarily, ONLY with the support of the USSR. The Chinese, even with Vietnam, could not. So that I do not need about the great army of China.
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 21 November 2018 08: 36
              +2
              Quote: zyzx
              Yes, I don’t have megalomania, only knowledge of history, all the neighbors of the Chinese, including the smallest Mongols and the Japanese, turned and what Western democracies did with the Chinese. The only thing is that when China achieved militarily, ONLY with the support of the USSR. The Chinese, even with Vietnam, could not. So that I do not need about the great army of China.

              I also know the story. Great empires had the property to fall apart, or unite. Now China is united by the ideology of the CCP, its own philosophy, and the desire for the best. He was humiliated too much and for a long time. Therefore, I believe that there are all prerequisites for China to rise to the place of the first World Power.
    2. Altona
      Altona 21 November 2018 07: 57
      +2
      Quote: ANCIENT
      And I always said that the Chinese are just opportunists and cowards

      -----------------------------------
      Aggressive traders with appropriate psychology.
      1. zyzx
        zyzx 21 November 2018 08: 32
        +1
        Quote: Altona
        Aggressive traders with appropriate psychology.

        Yes, they are.
    3. venik
      venik 21 November 2018 09: 22
      0
      Quote: ANCIENT
      And I always said that the Chinese are just opportunists and cowards, from those `` friends '' that are no better than enemies.

      =========
      And here you are, my friend, Sergey Vitalievich and NOT RIGHTS !!! Oh how wrong!!!! They are not "opportunists" and far from being cowards !!!
      It's just that they (the Chinese) act EXCLUSIVELY in OWN (long-term) INTERESTS !!! In full accordance with the "Long-Term Development Program of China", developed by the late "Comrade Deng" (Deng Xiaoping) ...... And this program is nothing more than a program of "Achieve World Domination" !!! And at the same time, they are guided by the logic voiced by the British politician William Pitt (Jr.): “Britain has no regular friends nor permanent enemies “Britain has only PERMANENT INTERESTS!” Accordingly, “current” friends and enemies are determined based on these interests.
      Do you think this is a joke? Far from it! Completely "Comrade Dan's program" is not just "classified" - it is FULLY known only to a few top party officials ... All the rest are given "for review" only individual quotes and provisions, and "squeezes" .... Do not you believe? Try searching on the Internet !!!
      By the way - they consider Siberia and the Far East as their territories (not now of course - but in some perspective) ....
      Well, "polite smiles", "handshakes", declarations of complete mutual understanding ", etc., etc. are, firstly," His Majesty Diplomacy ", and secondly, this is EAST !!! And EAST -" business - delicate "!!!
      So, at the moment - they are for Russia - simply - "TRAVELERS"! And expect some kind of "friendly support" from them - to the highest degree - NAIVELY !!! (They will "maneuver based solely on OWN INTERESTS !!!"
  2. Cat Kuzya
    Cat Kuzya 21 November 2018 06: 28
    +5
    Simply put, Chinese banks have refused to deal with Russian banks AT ALL. So much for your "strategic partner" ... True, their chairman, with a smile, has already explained the reason for this "partnership" - "the trade turnover between China and the United States is $ 700 billion, and between China and Russia, only $ 60 billion .... . thus, it is easy to understand who is a "strategic" partner for China, and who is not .... " wink
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 21 November 2018 08: 15
      +3
      Why should we be offended if we ourselves advocated capitalism? Nothing personal just business! So what are your claims?
  3. Alexander Bushkovsky
    Alexander Bushkovsky 21 November 2018 06: 32
    +1
    We must always remember that Asians have always been, are and will be so. When they smile at you and assure you of friendship, they hold figs in their pockets and a few cobblestones in their bosoms.
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 21 November 2018 08: 18
      +4
      Yes, probably all merchants are, regardless of nation. Che do not smile if in front of you whose burdock was bred at the expense of time! Remember the smiles with Gorbachev. That's where the scam was!
    2. Semurg
      Semurg 21 November 2018 08: 23
      +2
      Quote: Alexander Bushkovsky
      We must always remember that Asians have always been, are and will be so. When they smile at you and assure you of friendship, they hold figs in their pockets and a few cobblestones in their bosoms.

      Europeans are not like that? Africans? Latinos? Everyone first of all thinks about themselves and their own benefit, and only then peace, chewing gum, friendship.
  4. vaaaaadik
    vaaaaadik 21 November 2018 06: 34
    +1
    The Chinese are they and the Chinese are in Africa. Friendship is friendship, and money apart
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 21 November 2018 08: 21
      +5
      Our bigwigs are no better. Now you can dash off the article as our hucksters famously bred people on grandmas. This is gasoline and utilities. Those who wish can continue the list. And all these are our domestic businessmen and managers! There is no way to blame the Chinese!
  5. parusnik
    parusnik 21 November 2018 06: 45
    +6
    Chinese commercial banks are not ready to continue lending to Russian banks due to sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union.
    ... Who is the main shareholder of a commercial bank, he dictates his will ... And this shareholder somehow figs on the explanations of the Bank of Russia ....
  6. igorbrsv
    igorbrsv 21 November 2018 07: 36
    +1
    Please note that "a number of Chinese banks" are indicated in the article, not all. And then the degree all rises in the comments. Not all Chinese banks have cooperated with us before
    1. Altona
      Altona 21 November 2018 08: 06
      +2
      Quote: igorbrsv
      Not all Chinese banks have cooperated with us before.

      -------------------------
      Chinese banks also have such specifics that they can not carry out all transactions without special permissions from the Bank of China.
  7. Gardamir
    Gardamir 21 November 2018 08: 04
    +7
    Similar articles have a clear minus. Before you judge others, you need to figure out in your house. They do not go to the Crimea alone, they don’t go to the Crimea, they close their branches in cities, but they are actively buying up foreign assets.
  8. rocket757
    rocket757 21 November 2018 08: 34
    +2
    China naf. To ponder and ask the government ruling questions - why should our economy be financed over the hill, with or without reason ???
    We have, inside the country, a credit and financial sector NOT. EXIST????
    Still - if it’s done like an idiot / criminal, who benefits?
  9. Tank jacket
    Tank jacket 21 November 2018 08: 37
    +2
    First, the Central Bank must be returned to the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation. Credit policy and monetary change from wrecking to constructive. Sanctions are the tenth most important.
  10. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 21 November 2018 08: 37
    0
    Two days ago this problem was solved. The Bank of Russia sent a clarification to the People’s Bank of China, and the People’s Bank of China, in turn, brought the contents of these explanations to its commercial banks.

    So how is it? Did it help? wink
  11. snake
    snake 21 November 2018 13: 21
    +2
    The Bank of Russia representative office decided to explain to the Chinese that they "are not correctly interpreting the sanctions regime."

    To which the Chinese showed the Representative Office of the Bank of Russia a little yellow dragon. For the assertion that "China is a friend and ally for Russia" exists only within the framework of Kiselev's propaganda.