Singapore law enforcement officers surprised question about the verification of foreign delegates

41
Journalists literally threw questions at the leadership of Singapore’s law enforcement agencies in connection with the methods of inspecting members of foreign delegations. Recall that on the air of the federal channels were shown footage of how representatives of the Singapore security services checked the presidential aide Yury Ushakov, carefully examining his jacket and trousers to find "dangerous items and substances." So did the other delegates.

Singapore law enforcement officers surprised question about the verification of foreign delegates




Then it was stated that President Vladimir Putin (“like everyone else”) had to pass through the turnstile. In separate media, it was stated that he allegedly passed through the metal detector frame, which was finally denied by the press secretary of the head of state Dmitry Peskov.

For reference: Vladimir Putin makes a three-day visit to Singapore, where several summits take place at once, including the ASEAN summit.

Singapore law enforcement agencies with genuine bewilderment responded to questions about the verification. The answer is one: this is the law.

According to the laws of this country, from the point of view of security, there is absolutely no difference whether it is a question of an ordinary citizen or a representative of the authorities, including a foreign state. This is the norm, which, as they say, reinforced concrete entered into the practice of the work of law enforcement officers of Singapore.

In this regard, one can learn from Asian New York, as Singapore is often called. When everyone is really equal before the law: from a spreader of water to a president - it is worthy of respect.

Singapore laws are harsh, but it is thanks to them and the attitude to these laws of the population and the state, in a country that was a mosquito outback several decades ago, order was put in place: in the economy, in politics, and in society.

To understand - several Singaporean laws, or rather, prohibitive measures: threw garbage on the sidewalk - Singaporean 2000 fine (almost 100 thousand rubles!), Drunk driving - fine (for the first time) to Singapore's 5000 (245 thousand). rubles), feed wild birds - a Singaporean 500 fine, watering flowers with water remaining in a saucer or flower pot - a 500 SGD fine (otherwise mosquitoes will be divorced).

Tens of thousands of surveillance cameras are following. They are everywhere. At the same time, it does not occur to anyone in Singapore to declare it a violation of human rights or a violation of personal freedom.
  • https://www.facebook.com/singaporepoliceforce
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    15 November 2018 14: 53
    "Singaporean law enforcement officers reacted with genuine bewilderment to questions about the verification. There is only one answer: this is the law."
    Why so? belay Savages!
    1. +11
      15 November 2018 14: 57
      Quote: dr.star75
      Why so? Savages!

      What can you do about the Papuan, not to piss on the wall, not to lie in the bushes. Thought Anglo-Saxon swearing. wassat
      1. +1
        15 November 2018 15: 33
        Quote: Evdokim
        Quote: dr.star75
        Why so? Savages!

        What can you do about the Papuan, not to piss on the wall, not to lie in the bushes. Thought Anglo-Saxon swearing. wassat

        No Novice chokes.
      2. +7
        15 November 2018 15: 38
        this is where NATO members need to conduct exercises, and not in Norway. The Singapore police would instantly teach them how to "walk on the big side." Yes
  2. +9
    15 November 2018 14: 54
    Well, no ... it's not like a man ... we can't live like that ... boring ...
  3. +3
    15 November 2018 15: 08
    To understand - a few Singapore laws, or rather prohibitive measures: threw garbage on the sidewalk - a fine of 2000 Singapore dollars (almost 100 thousand rubles!), Driving while intoxicated - a fine (for the first time) up to 5000 thousand Singapore dollars (245 thousand rubles), to feed wild birds - a fine of 500 Singapore dollars, watering flowers with the remaining water in a saucer or flower pot - a fine of 500 SGD (otherwise mosquitoes will divorce).
    Horror

    Tens of thousands of surveillance cameras are following. They are everywhere. At the same time, it does not occur to anyone in Singapore to declare it a violation of human rights or a violation of personal freedom.
    Boredom.
    And when you find out how much the minimum wage is there. So you understand that the wrong country was called Honduras laughing
  4. +15
    15 November 2018 15: 09
    Of course, Singapore has made significant strides in strengthening the well-being of citizens, in the economy, in state building, and in the fight against corruption.
    Here are just a few "buts".
    1. The area of ​​this state is 684 square meters. km not 684 thousand, but just 684 square kilometers. There is one city - Singapore. This fact makes any comparison with the USA or the Russian Federation pointless.
    2. Since the time of Britain's abandonment of the colonies, and Singapore's "independence" in 1965, the key to the successful development of Singapore were 2 unshakable rules: not a single communist in power, loyalty to the former metropolis. He did not acquire independence, just the form of influence on the colony was changed.
    For example, British troops were withdrawn only in 1971, and even then, not without the help of Israel.

    For all that, Singapore is a very wealthy city-state. It is the world's largest port, by such an indicator as the tonnage of cargo per day. With this in mind, as well as a small territory, not only cameras, plasma panels, you can hang everything up - there would be a desire.
    1. +8
      15 November 2018 15: 32
      Quote: Faceless
      not a single communist in power

      You should not mention such a political system so arbitrarily. Communist - this was a very vague concept before. Today - even more so. In China, millions of communists are in power, and the pace of development today is no worse than that of Singapore. And China today is intercepting many of Singapore's businesses. So this argument is from your propaganda baggage.
      In Singapore, the pragmatists (they are technocrats) were and are in power. This is the key to its socio-economic development. And that's all. The same can be observed today in China. This is completely absent today in Russia, where "seasoned" capitalists are in power.
      1. +3
        16 November 2018 09: 38
        You should not mention such a political system so arbitrarily. Communist - this was a very vague concept before.


        These are not my arbitrary words, but a literal translation of the popular slogan of Lee Kuan Yew, the creator of the "Economic Miracle" of Singapore. On the whole, he managed to do this "without the communists" (in an active struggle against them, and by all available means, up to and including persecution for political reasons).

        So my propaganda baggage has nothing to do with it. My personal attitude towards the communist is very ambivalent and multidimensional, not least depending on the country in which they are trying to promote their ideas, but this is a topic for another, separate discussion.

        Once again, just on the basis of territory, comparing Singapore with China or Russia is stupid. The similar transformations and reforms in these countries are disproportionate in terms of labor costs.

        As for propaganda - today we hear a lot about Chinese, Singaporean, Arab (UAE), American (during the four FDR terms) economic miracles, but we forget about the Soviet one, when, in the context of global sanctions and essentially the absence of normal diplomatic relations with half of the world (if not with most of it) we have gone from a plow to a nuclear bomb. This path of ours was also under the actual leadership of one particular person, but his difficulties, taking into account the external and internal situation, were incommensurate with any of the phenomena that many today call "economic miracles."
        1. 0
          16 November 2018 19: 42
          Quote: Faceless
          So my propaganda baggage has nothing to do with it. My personal attitude towards the communist is very ambivalent and multidimensional.

          And how. Your personal attitude got out even here. The sixties communist ideas are one thing. The communist ideas of the nineties are completely different. Communist ideas today are something even more different, unlike the first two. The sixties communists can not be compared with the eighties communists (Putin, Chubais, Gaidar and others), and even more so can not be compared with the Communists of Pope Zyu.
          Lee Kuan Yew chose the country's most pragmatic development plan. He emphasized a market economy, declared the country's anti-communist development (very sensible and pragmatic at that time), and plannedly began to develop the economy and plan social policy.
          I have never been a communist (!). And your anti-communism takes you in the wrong direction. In Singapore, any extraneous ideology that could threaten the current state system will now be pursued. Any, and not only communist.
          The transformations and reforms that are identical in spirit in these countries are disproportionate in terms of labor costs.
          I do not know what you are talking about, what you are comparing and measuring. The USSR (and Russia as well) paid a huge price for enormous progress, both economic and social. And now Russia is "profiting" these achievements, of which there are so many that it still cannot "profuse" them. And we also "lost our economic miracle". This is what we are talking about. If the people of Russia want to someday end their current constant lag behind the leading countries, then they need to change their socio-economic policy, and for this it is desirable to change the current Yeltsin-Putin government for pragmatists and technocrats in a peaceful constitutional way. But the government itself is unlikely to want this.
          Today we must not fight with the Communists. They stayed there in 60's. Forget about the communists. It is no coincidence that they are now actively fighting with them in Ukraine. The result is obvious.
          1. 0
            19 November 2018 10: 14
            Reading the response to the comment with quotes from my calculations, I get the feeling that someone is very bad with the Russian language, and this someone is clearly not me.

            And how. Your personal attitude got out even here. The sixties communist ideas are one thing. The communist ideas of the nineties are completely different. Communist ideas today are something even more different, unlike the first two. The sixties communists can not be compared with the eighties communists (Putin, Chubais, Gaidar and others), and even more so can not be compared with the Communists of Pope Zyu.


            And what was I talking about? - that everywhere everything is different for everyone. A comparison of this is a topic for a separate discussion, which has little connection with Singapore, and therefore did not begin to develop the topic.

            And your anti-communism takes you in the wrong direction.


            - from the same series. I am not an anti-communist as such. I believe that, on the whole, the transformations and the standard of living achieved under Leonid Brezhnev in the USSR, or the level of economic development in modern communist China deserve respect. While communism as a result is utopia. Also, in principle, as democracy, in the degree of utopianism.
            But I, since my views so haunt you - a convinced monarchist. With all the consequences. And the closer the Russian government system is to an absolute monarchy, the better for the Russian Federation. Yes, the thesis is debatable, but according to my beliefs, such a development option will be the best.
            To those who call themselves Communists in the Russian Federation (Communist Party) as a party, I feel extremely bad. A number of presidential elections showed the full degree of corruption of the leadership of the Communist Party. Further, without details.

            I do not know what you are talking about, with which you are comparing and measuring. The USSR (including Russia) paid a huge price for the huge progress, both economic and social.


            - see a couple of lines above: Chinese, Singaporean, Arabian (UAE), American (four times FDR terms) economic miracles. And our significantly greater efforts in creating our miracle, I just emphasized.

            And now Russia is "profiting" these achievements, of which there are so many that it still cannot "profuse" them. And we also "lost our economic miracle". That's what we're talking about ...


            How these calculations relate to the provisions of the article and the information in my commentary is a mystery. This is a separate topic for research, which I don’t want to discuss with you on this platform, and in principle. Here it is out of place, but in principle - meaningless. What happens when, since the times of the USSR, "everything is only plundered and nothing is done" we see in Ukraine. Compare with RF. Hope you can see the difference.

            Instead of a resume. To separate the USSR and the Russian Federation in relation to them is stupidity. These two states are Our Motherland. To love one thing and to hate and find fault with another is to put it mildly sheer myopia. If all "Soviet" people also loved and also treated the Russian Federation, as they declare their attitude to the USSR, the state of affairs would be much better. But for some reason, many prefer to moan and complain about life, remembering how good it was before. Time cannot be returned, and it will not be good either, and with such approaches it is only more difficult to achieve good in the future. It is strange that it is not obvious.
            1. 0
              19 November 2018 15: 50
              Dear Faceless, you are a convinced monarchist (according to your statement, and that did not surprise me at all. "Say something, and I will tell you who you are."). This is enough to end the discussion. You and I are incapable of perceiving each other's beliefs. In Russia today it is practically a monarchy. So enjoy the reality. More semblance of a monarchy in Russia is highly unlikely. This concludes. hi
    2. +1
      15 November 2018 15: 47
      You correctly noticed ... there would be a desire ... and if there is no desire ... then ... this is how we live ...
  5. +12
    15 November 2018 15: 15
    I never understood these groans of admiration for such historical glitches like Singapore. They pumped up the town with money, moved the corporate headquarters there, and forced the local Aborigines to go around. And should we all take this as an example to follow?
    Forgive me, of course, but the fine for leaving in a platter of water ... is a complete idiocy and mockery. And no one will convince me otherwise. But everywhere there are cameras ... and, apparently, the local Chinese are knocking at each other, as is customary with Western organizers of order. Beauty. No thanks, eat such economic miracles yourself.
  6. +7
    15 November 2018 15: 15
    Tens of thousands of surveillance cameras monitor everything. They are everywhere. Moreover, in Singapore, it never occurred to anyone to declare this a violation of human rights or a violation of personal freedom...
    ----------
    If this is true, then these are slaves who will never rebel against their masters. A respect for the owners of education
    1. 0
      16 November 2018 08: 54
      If this is true, then these are slaves who will never rebel against their masters. A respect for the owners of education

      And they’re not going to winked with such a standard of living
      Of course, give freedom! And the most free are Ukrainians. There is generally freedom fool
      1. 0
        16 November 2018 11: 54
        It looks like you Ukrainians at every convenient and not convenient case you remember. Do not remember - you can’t eat. But why?
        1. 0
          16 November 2018 14: 01
          Quote: Troll
          It looks like you Ukrainians at every convenient and not convenient case you remember. Do not remember - you can’t eat. But why?

          To me personally, Ukrainians have not come anywhere. But they also wanted freedom. And, Ukraine is near hi
  7. +7
    15 November 2018 15: 18
    Bust they have with "equality before the law." I understand that terrorists and hired killers can disguise themselves as anyone, even as journalists (Hekmatyar was killed like that), but I have never heard such a thing about the head of state committing terrorist acts! There is equality before the law in Singapore, but what is common sense?
    1. 0
      15 November 2018 15: 30
      Quote: Sergei Medvedev
      but for the head of state to carry out terrorist attacks

      On this resource, one or the other state falls into the category of terrorist state among different speakers. In this case, the head of this state will be the main terrorist. Who knows, he will press a button in a suitcase or charge with a fork in the eye ...
      1. 0
        15 November 2018 18: 09
        representatives of Singaporean security services checked the assistant to the president of the Russian Federation, Yuri Ushakov, carefully examining his jacket and trousers to find “dangerous objects and substances”.

        In this case, the head of this state will be the main terrorist. Who knows, he will press a button in a suitcase or charge with a fork in the eye ...

        If the state were called say Military Review, I think Trump or Netanyahu, they arrested them right at the airport. laughing And why, in this case, include the "nuclear briefcase", whether Putin or Trump, from which they can turn half the world into ruins? To "dangerous items"? Or "substances"? Or was this suitcase handed over at the airport for storage? Of course, this approach cannot but command respect, but sometimes common sense does not hurt.
    2. +4
      15 November 2018 16: 13
      Quote: Sergei Medvedev
      There is equality before the law in Singapore, and common sense is like?

      Fine. You just need to get used to it ... from childhood ... Do not smoke at school and do not beat classmates, taking pictures on the camera, do not even PR with the murder of kittens. And just think before you do disgusting things. So Hottabych taught Gogu the sneak. It is from this that equality before the law begins. But there it would never occur to anyone to hold the embezzler under house arrest or reward him for his services to the Fatherland. And it’s so nice to remember that no matter how high you go up the ranks, if something happens they will bury you in the ground ...
      1. 0
        15 November 2018 19: 28
        Be a zombie since childhood? Man is characterized by irrationality.
        1. 0
          16 November 2018 06: 11
          Quote: naidas
          Be a zombie since childhood? Man is characterized by irrationality.

          repeat this to yourself if the gopari - "not zombies" make you or someone of your loved ones disabled
      2. 0
        16 November 2018 06: 40
        All is correct. I absolutely agree with you.
    3. 0
      15 November 2018 18: 09
      Quote: Sergei Medvedev
      for the head of state to carry out terrorist attacks, I have not heard such a thing!

      The head of state, perhaps, did not commit. But the Japanese ambassador, for example, hacked the Korean queen not in the dark Middle Ages, but in 1895!
  8. +3
    15 November 2018 15: 40
    Yeah, but what the author did not write that the GDP, as always, was late on the first day for a meeting with the Prime Minister of Singapore? And when he arrived, that one had already caught a trace! And if I arrived on time, I would not have to go through the framework, because the protocol. But on the second day, the protocol service pushed the GDP out of the meeting schedule, and yet I had to go through the framework and Ushakov turned his pockets out.
  9. BAI
    +5
    15 November 2018 15: 41
    There is only one answer: this is the law.

    The question is that only Putin was allowed to go through the frame (though there is information now that Putin did not go through the frame, but the turnstile) or all the heads of state? If only Putin - then there is nothing to talk about the law, if all - then there are no questions.
    1. +1
      15 November 2018 16: 23
      By the way, you have the most logical question, everything else is a transfusion of emptiness.
      1. 0
        16 November 2018 04: 45
        Quote: BAI
        If only Putin - then there is nothing to talk about the law, if all - then there are no questions.

        Quote: Gardamir
        By the way, you have the most logical question, everything else is a transfusion of emptiness.

        We do not know all the circumstances.

        Quote: dgonni
        the author did not write that the GDP, as always, was late on the first day for a meeting with the Prime Minister of Singapore

        That is, the face is not a standard situation (unless it certainly took place). Therefore, the question should be clarified as follows: was the approach to all participants the same, given the circumstances. Judging by the first lines of the article, not one of our delegation was closely monitored.
    2. +1
      16 November 2018 06: 43
      Even if only him.
      Gone? Didn't fall apart?
      Ordinary people also go through the frame and also do not fall apart.
  10. 0
    15 November 2018 16: 50
    This is the order, no exceptions ... but what is wrong?
  11. +1
    15 November 2018 16: 55
    Treat the Singapore delegation the same way, happen to come to Russia, undress to cowards, you never know. The law is law, but to inspect the assistant to President Rossi. Yes, and the president himself through the framework is a mockery.
    1. -3
      15 November 2018 16: 59
      You just don’t need to be late, that’s the whole story! But then, South Korea and the Japanese were late for Putin. If it’s easier, they showed xy from xy.
      1. 0
        16 November 2018 16: 01
        Quote: dgonni
        You just don’t need to be late, that’s the whole story! But then, South Korea and the Japanese were late for Putin. If it’s easier, they showed xy from xy.


        I am ashamed to ask, but did the President personally write you an explanatory note about the reasons for "being late"?
        Your fantasies on this subject were already boldly bold.

        The protocol was created for the first persons, not the first persons for the protocol, which is always changed and very rarely maintained.

        PS In Russian, the names are capitalized, as well as in your native English.
  12. +5
    15 November 2018 17: 18
    There are many "jokes" of this kind in Singapore. Well, for example, "chewing gum" is forbidden - for them a monstrous shtaf, it is forbidden to collect leaves and branches - police can cling to them - like you plucked them, forbidden, forbidden, forbidden .... yes, everything is forbidden, even to publicly express feelings. But there is another, full of so-called servants from the "ledy-boys" - in the evening on the "horchad-alley" full of them in cafes like "talk", yeah. Koshakov love - they are there in authority - well-fed and not frightened - such an animal lives in every cafe-eatery and entertains the public-visitors in the evenings. It's also cool how they repair roads - surround the repair site with sound-absorbing screens and industrial vacuum cleaners - so that there is no noise and dust, I saw a policeman approach such a place with screens and measure decibels with a device. Cars at a construction site do not drive on the ground, but on a special mesh-covering so that nothing sticks to the wheels and anyway, at the exit, the wheels are washed or blown with compressed air. But the same taxis sometimes drive so broken and dirty (both outside and inside) that you just wonder ... Well, everything is expensive there, just fucking expensive ... The electronics were not very expensive, and that was only in the markets (in multi-storey buildings) and Chinese consumer goods, brands are also expensive, there is nowhere to go ... Well, there are very good museums of old English forts ...
    1. +1
      16 November 2018 15: 32
      And you also come to somewhere in the area called "little India" and ... my dear mother, but if for all the garbage that is lying around there, you can build another Singapore nearby. And they work there at shipyards, construction sites, shopping centers, etc. mostly not natives, but migrant workers - Hindus, Filipinos, Indonesians. And the indigenous population, they are like Muscovites - they do not engage in any nonsense.
  13. -1
    15 November 2018 17: 47
    Quote: dgonni
    Yeah, but what the author did not write that the GDP, as always, was late on the first day for a meeting with the Prime Minister of Singapore? And when he arrived, that one had already caught a trace! And if I arrived on time, I would not have to go through the framework, because the protocol. But on the second day, the protocol service pushed the GDP out of the meeting schedule, and yet I had to go through the framework and Ushakov turned his pockets out.

    So Singapore is a tame dog of the Zionists. Perfectly trained and 100% devoted to the owners. Just an example of personality degradation.
    As they say, they will do so without thinking.
  14. 0
    15 November 2018 17: 57
    the author made a small clarification when the GDP passed through the frame, the frame rang, but no one asked him to pull out all the metal things, so all this is window dressing
  15. 0
    15 November 2018 18: 21
    Quote: Author
    ... watering flowers with water left in a saucer or flower pot is a fine of 500 SGD.

    it must be understood that in Singapore the authoritarian regime and whether the kuan yu family are in action, corruption is not about them)))
    In my opinion, the citizens of Singapore are slaves of this family and the ideology of kuan yu, leading the satisfying regulated existence of animals in the zoo - under the close supervision of video cameras.
    It seems that the author likes such an existence)))
    Quote: Lee Kua Yu
    ... I am often accused of interfering in the privacy of citizens. Yes, if I did not do this, we would not have achieved what we have been able to achieve today.
    And I say without a hint of regret that we would not have achieved such economic progress if I had not intervened in personal affairs. Who is your neighbor, how do you live, why do you make noise, how do you spit and what language do you speak - WE DECIDE what is right. No matter what people think

    ".... Women without higher education, who have a second child, pay a fine.
    Uneducated is strongly recommended to sterilize in exchange for a significant amount of money.
    Two children per family are considered optimal. Therefore, in the evenings, the police call families with two children and remind them to take the contraceptive pill and use a condom. "
    Regarding the framework and Putin:
    https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3799539?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C8681912248

    PS
    to believe the statements of mudkoyazychny Peskov, in my opinion, to disrespect yourself, it is enough to remember the disgrace with the Golden Sachs and director Oliver Stone. \ _ (ツ) _ /
  16. 0
    16 November 2018 06: 36
    When everyone is equal before the law: from the waterman to the president, that’s worthy of respect.

    As A. Raikin said in the famous film: "Is it good? It's disgusting!"
    ... Singapore law enforcement officers with genuine bewilderment responded to questions about the verification. There is only one answer: this is the law.
    According to the laws of this country, from the point of view of security, there is absolutely no difference whether we are talking about an ordinary citizen or a representative of the government, including a foreign state. This is the norm, which, as they say, reinforced concrete entered the practice of Singapore law enforcement ...

    This is what kind of perverted logic you need to have in order to live like this?
    It’s necessary to think of such a thing! This society is meaningless.
    No, something needs to be done with this country. And then others, not an hour, will also begin to live like that.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"