In search of fort Rajewski. 1 part

12
The Black Sea coastline fortifications still generates a lot of disputes. Some say that it was useless. Others blame the garrisons of the fortifications for inaction. In the modest opinion of the author, the fortifications lacked one thing — the foresight of the capital. On the danger of artillery strikes from the sea in general, they closed their eyes. The supply of not only food but also ammunition was delayed both due to natural causes (storms, mountain river spills), and due to underfunding. The same reason lay at the basis of the insufficient reliability of the fortifications, which were often erected from improvised means.

The same inattention of the capital had an effect on the personnel of the garrisons, which was insufficient for a full-fledged defense against superior enemy forces. Service in these fortifications was equated to exile because of the terrible conditions and the danger of every minute. At the same time, heroes forged in the Caucasus often aroused later suspicions from a “decent public”. Thus, in separate forts, almost weekly exchanges of fire led from one hundred and fifty fighters to 3-4's mouth. This fact was also influenced by the bad supply, more defenders just physically could not be fed.




View from the mountains to the Anapa Valley

Thus, when the mountain leaders could gather from five hundred to several thousand Circassians under arms, and even thanks to the Turks and the European "allies", arm them not only with small arms. weapons, but also by artillery, starting with the falcontes, then it was simply mean to talk about the inaction of the garrisons. Holding the outposts of the empire itself became a feat.

And there were quite a few fortifications up to the tragedy of the Crimea and the removal of all the garrisons: Nikolaev and Novorossiysk, Kabardin and Navaginsk, Tenginsk and Mikhailovsk, Gelendzhik and Novotroitsk, etc. Some of them have sunk into oblivion, leaving their feat unknown as a battle of the Nikolaev fort, which can only be judged by the ruins of fortifications, because the garrison was completely destroyed by the mountaineers. Others have become famous all over Russia thanks to brave ones like Arkhip Osipov from the Mikhailovsky Fortification.

But turn to stories little-known fortifications, with intermediate status. It was located on the Maskaga River (another Adyge name is often on the maps — Meskaga), and it was often called Fort Rayevsky (or Rayevsky Fort).

Initially, the need for the construction of the fort was due to several factors. First, the new fortification was supposed to prevent the Natukhai raids on the Kuban villages and Black Sea coast, i.e. territory on the right side of the river Kuban. Therefore, the fort eventually settled just in the inhospitable lands of the Natukhay Adygs. Secondly, the strategic road between Anapa and the Novorossiysk fortification demanded constant protection during the movement of troops and cargo.

In search of fort Rajewski. 1 part

Lazar Serebryakov

The place for the new fort was chosen by Lazar Serebryakov himself, appointed head of the first branch of the Black Sea coastline in 1838. He also took the liberty to name a new fortification in honor of his brother-in-arms Nikolai Rajewski.

Only decades later it turns out that the Raevsky fort was a kind of descendant of much more ancient fortifications. The first archaeologists at the end of the 19 century found in the area the remains of an ancient fortress, wondering why the Turks call this area, in some places similar to the ancient settlement, Nagai-Kale (“Kale” means a fortress). And in 2011, Russian archaeologists near the village of Rayevskaya will dig up part of a stone watchtower, presumably from the Roman period. These structures, also supposedly served the same purposes as the fort Rayevsky after them - the protection of strategic paths.

The fort was located on the southern outskirts of the Anapa Valley, i.e. almost in the foothills of the spurs of the North Caucasus, not far from the small river Maskaga (now 2-5 m wide depending on the season) with a low but steep bank. The fortification stood on a somewhat elevated plateau relative to the valley, which became an additional argument in the defense. Now this place is located a kilometer east of the outskirts of the village of Rayevskaya, next to the dirt road (a branch of the envelope of the village), turning in the direction of the village of Verkhnebakansky. But about the location with photos of the area and elements of the embankment fortifications will take a look later.

But who exactly built the fort on Maskage? Oddly enough, Rayevsky's squad. So, in the published materials of the Novorossiysk Museum there is a letter from 7 of September 1839 of Lazar Serebryakov to admiral Alexander Menshikov: “General Rajewski four days ago landed troops in Anapa to build a fortification on Maskage ... In Anapa, another cavalry Cossack regiment will join his unit. Behind all this, 2500 is unlikely to have a man under arms. And the strengthening not earlier than deep autumn can finish, and autumn earthworks are very fragile. ”


Nikolay Raevsky

The phrase “hardly” in this case is by no means an indicator of weakness, lack of confidence in the troops or an attempt to “fill the price” for a march to the southern outskirts of the Anapa Valley. The fact is that in the best of times, the mountaineers could collect, according to various estimates, from 100 to 200 thousands of fighters, but although these times for the 30-40 years of the 19 century passed, systematic attacks in groups from 500 to 3000 bayonets were the norm. At the same time, the Circassians perfectly orientated themselves on the territory, had escape routes and natural bases in the form of numerous villages.

The reports of the commander of the Separate Caucasus Corps and the governor in the Caucasus, General of Infantry Yevgeny Alexandrovich Golovin also mentioned a fort on the Maskaga River: “In 1839, only one detachment of Lieutenant General N.N. Raevsky, which was intended to erect two coastal fortifications: one at the Subashi River (now the Shah River), and the other at the Psezuapse River and another intermediate between Anapa and Novorossiysk ”.

In the reports from December 2 1839 of the same Golovin it follows that, "according to the designs of Your Imperial Majesty," by that time fortifications were built in Novorossiysk, Veliyaminov fortification, Tenginskoe, Navaginskoe at Subashi, the fort at Psezuapse and the intermediate fort at Maskage.

Behind dry reports and dates, in fact, lies the hard labor of hundreds of people who erected both the fortifications themselves and those who defended them from raids during construction and after. The Cossacks and the soldiers of the glorious Tenginsky regiment, whom Rajevsky had welcomed, were biting into the ground at that time unfriendly.



Nikolai Ivanovich Lorer, a Decembrist, a participant in 1812-14 military campaigns, an optimist, romanticist and a member of many secret societies, was among the builders and first fortifications, for which, naturally, after being sent to Siberia, was transferred to the Caucasus in the Tenginsky regiment. For the hard fall of 1839, he left the following memories:

“In the Caucasus, no one can be left behind, nor pushed aside, and precautions are strictly observed. Something broke at someone else, the whole caravan stopped and did not move before, as everything was put in order ...

Towards evening we arrived at the elevated plateau and stopped to build a new fort. Since it was September in the courtyard, it was quite a bit freezing at night ... We were chilly and shivering from the cold, and Rayevsky fort grew and grew little by little.

Some kind of despondency, apathy bored us, and we were thirsting for at least a shootout, and even it was not there. There is no music in the camp, no peselnikov, can not see the card game and booze. And only Danzas, always cheerful, will make us laugh. But as everything has its end, we waited for the return trip ... to Anapa. Rajewski released the guards to St. Petersburg, the 6-month expedition is over. "


There should clarify a couple of details. Firstly, the one mentioned by Lorer Danzas is Konstantin Karlovich Danzas, at that moment a lieutenant colonel and was sentenced to two months in the Peter and Paul Fortress for participating in a duel between Dantes and Pushkin as the second of the latter. After his release, he served in St. Petersburg, but soon quarreled with his superiors and was sent to the Tengin regiment in the Caucasus. Together with Rajewski he participated in landings at the mouth of the Subashi (Shah) and Psezuapse. According to the memoirs of contemporaries, showed reckless courage, as if he was looking for bullets.


Konstantin Danzas

Secondly, the 6-month expedition, about which Lorer wrote, actually lasted a little longer. It started in the second half of April 1839 in Taman. On the ships of the Black Sea fleet troops went to the mouth of Subashi and reached it on May 2. The next landing was carried out at the mouth of Psezuapse already on July 7, where after the battles, as on Subashi, a fort was erected. In general, the official laying of Fort Raevsky on September 11, 1839 was the crown of a tiring and extremely dangerous campaign.

To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    15 November 2018 07: 03
    Many thanks to the author. I read with interest
  2. +2
    15 November 2018 09: 18
    It always amazed me that beside the soldiers, whose share was always unenviable, were shoulder to shoulder officers-nobles who could send everything away and lash champagne in St. Petersburg.
    1. +3
      15 November 2018 11: 22
      Quote: Cheldon
      It always amazed me that beside the soldiers, whose share was always unenviable, were shoulder to shoulder officers-nobles who could send everything away and lash champagne in St. Petersburg.

      Could not - the same Danzas was in those parts not of his own free will, but by order.
      After his release, he served in St. Petersburg, but soon quarreled with his superiors and was sent to the Tenginsky regiment in the Caucasus.

      "To send everything away" in his case is to fly out of the guards and, probably, acquire a reputation as a coward.
    2. +2
      15 November 2018 11: 27
      Quote: Cheldon
      It always amazed me that beside the soldiers, whose share was always unenviable, were shoulder to shoulder officers-nobles who could send everything away and lash champagne in St. Petersburg.

      Many people preferred to do just that. We went once "to nature" for half a year, put a tick in the record and ok. Champagne, it’s like that - it can run out of steam, but the Caucasus ... well, the Caucasus, it will stand forever ... In short, there were all sorts of things.
    3. +2
      15 November 2018 12: 38
      Quote: Cheldon
      could send everything away and whip champagne in St. Petersburg.

      They could - after the "Decree on the Liberty of the Nobility." But the bulk of the nobles had not yet forgotten the motto: "The duty of a nobleman is to serve the Fatherland!" How is it with Bushkov:
      "In our" democratic "time, it is believed, by the inertia of Soviet times, that the nobles" in fact "were not the best people in Russia and that their privileges and wealth were given completely in vain, for no reason. A class principle, you understand! just one thing ... And you guys go to Azov. There are perfectly preserved walls of a Turkish fortress 25-30 meters high, there are bombards ... up to 80 centimeters in diameter.
      Further - it is clear. We take a staircase ... 30 meters long, it will weigh 150 pounds ... This and take it together for three. A sword in the teeth and forward. To the walls! Bombs fall from there, pour resin and boiling water, shoot, they push away the stairs with special hornets - and to the side, and your traveling companion is already writhing below with a broken spine. And you climb! And do not just climb - pistols on the belt. A sword in the teeth! Climbing up, encouraging male soldiers, organizing subordinates, pulling out the wounded along the way. Dolez? He pulled out pistols, smoke, cinder, bloodsuckers, lead - point blank, a sword naked - forward! The Turk is still full on the walls, and they are not going to give up. Penicillin and pain medication, by the way, have not yet been invented, so every second wound is gangrene and amputation, and every third, even by modern standards, is small - death in wild torment, like that of a prince, an oligarch and a nobleman in Andrei Bolkonsky’s knee. Fearfully? I do not want? There is nothing to be bothered. Did you get it? Congratulations, you nobles. (...)
      During the Pugachev region, more than 300 nobles of both sexes were hanged because they refused to swear allegiance to Pugachev - "the miraculously saved Peter III." Just like the captain and captain (!) Mironov. Pugachevites built noble families under the gallows, at first they hung their husbands in front of their wives and children. Then mothers in front of children. Sometimes they started with children - maybe this will impress parents? So: not a single case has been preserved in the history of a case when fathers and mothers (mothers too!) saved a child at the cost of a false oath.
      At the same time, ordinary soldiers, yesterday’s men, of course, usually betrayed, “recognizing” the “true king” in Pugachev. But what is surprising, they then, after the suppression of the riot, usually ... returned back "to the sovereign's service", and they were taken! Well, what did they give slack, changed the oath? Guys. What to take from them. There is no real honor in them that can be done.
      And from the indigenous nobility, only 1 (one!) Man scared under the gallows and went to serve Pugachev. After the defeat, the impostor rushed to save himself: after all, he was not at all the “ideological” enemy of Catherine. Well, at first I got scared, betrayed, and then there was no way out. The surname of this historical character is Schwanwich. He was Shvabrin at Pushkin, and all contemporaries immediately recognized who they were talking about. (...)
      It is difficult to describe the full measure of contempt for Schwanwich of the whole society. Schwanwich politically died. When he was taken to court in shackles, women tried not to touch him even with the edge of her dress. No one turned to him and did not answer his words, except for members of the court.
      According to the sentence, he was not executed, but exiled to the Turukhansk Territory forever. Catherine died, Paul reigned, Alexander ascended the throne, the war with Napoleon died down ... Shvanvich lived. None of the Sovereigns, despite the tradition, after accession to the throne did not pardon him. A living dead man rotted on the banks of the Yenisei, in the forest-tundra, for a good forty years. "
      1. +1
        15 November 2018 14: 16
        Pugachev, in addition to Shvanvich, served Bulankin and someone else. Pushkin in the original version of "The Captain's Daughter" wanted to give the main character a surname: Bulankin. Once in the newspaper I read a note: "Pushkin did not invent Grinev" it seems that some Grinevich was from Pugachev, and then against him. His father went to Catherine II to ask for pardon, and Pushkin, to heighten romanticism, this case attached to Masha Smirnova
        By the way, I asked for Schwanwich to save his life, Alexey Orlov
        1. 0
          15 November 2018 14: 33
          Quote: vladcub
          Pugachev in addition to Schwanwich served Bulankin and someone else

          If Grinevich was, then he is hardly Russian. Pugachev was served by a little more than a dozen of Polish gentry - but they did it for ideological reasons: "if only to make a mess of Russia!" By the way, unlike Shvanvich, they were not so despised: enemies, but you cannot call them traitors!
      2. 0
        16 November 2018 02: 33
        Quote: Tutejszy
        During the Pugachev region, more than 300 nobles of both sexes were hanged because they refused to swear allegiance to Pugachev - "the miraculously saved Peter III." Just like the captain and captain (!) Mironov. Pugachevites built noble families under the gallows, at first they hung their husbands in front of their wives and children. Then mothers in front of children. Sometimes they started with children - maybe this will impress parents? So: it has not been preserved in the history of ANY case described so that fathers and mothers (mothers too!) Saved the child at the cost of a false oath.
        At the same time, ordinary soldiers, yesterday’s men, of course, usually betrayed, “recognizing” the “true king” in Pugachev. But what is surprising, they then, after the suppression of the riot, usually ... returned back "to the sovereign's service", and they were taken! Well, what did they give slack, changed the oath? Guys. What to take from them. There is no real honor in them that can be done.

        Amazing facts ...
      3. 0
        16 November 2018 22: 04
        Quote: Tutejszy
        .. There are bombers ... with a diameter of up to 80 centimeters ...

        Excellent set out hi
  3. +1
    15 November 2018 14: 27
    It turns out Serebryakov himself without knowing located his fortification on the site of the Roman? The tactical benefits were obvious to both the Romans and Serebryakov.
    "Aroused suspicion among the" decent public ", these people are accustomed to death and color, and on the floor they were sad. Of course they will be suspicious
  4. 0
    16 November 2018 02: 36
    Quote: East Wind
    And in 2011, Russian archaeologists near the village of Raevskaya unearthed part of a stone watchtower, presumably of the Roman period. These structures, also supposedly, served the same purposes as the Raevsky fort after them - the protection of strategic routes.
    Most likely - of the Byzantine time, or there may be evidence of the Alans, or someone else. To the author - respect for the material!
  5. 0
    20 November 2018 12: 15
    Thanks to the author !!! The passport indicates the place of my birth, the village of Raevskaya, which I am very proud of!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"