Poltorak promised to answer Russia to "possible aggression" in the Black Sea

37
The Minister of Defense of Ukraine made another statement about how the Ukrainian army "is ready to confront Russia." At the same time, Stepan Poltorak said that Russia “may resort to aggressive actions on the Black Sea”. Given the fact that the terms “possible” and “with a high degree of probability” became decisive in the policies of individual states, it can be concluded that Kiev itself is ready for provocation on the Black Sea with the aim of imposing guilt on the Russian Federation.





By the way, a representative of the Operational Command of the DPR, Eduard Basurin, spoke about Kiev’s readiness for provocations. According to Colonel Basurin, Kiev is ready to carry out sabotage against civilian vessels in the Sea of ​​Azov.

In an interview with the Ukrainian 5 channel, owned by Petro Poroshenko, Poltorak said:
Exactly ready (to confront Russia). We draw conclusions from what is happening in the Azov Sea. We have there (in the Black Sea) room for maneuver and escalating efforts. Russia is not the full owner of the Black Sea, because there are NATO countries there, their interests are there.


According to Poltorak, the possibilities of Ukraine on the Black Sea are significantly greater than in the Sea of ​​Azov.

Meanwhile, experts believe that all these statements may have as their main goal the dissolution of another international fundamental treaty. This is the Montreux Convention of the 1936 year. It emphasizes the sovereignty of Turkey over the Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits and determines the character of the military courts of non-Black Sea states in the Black Sea basin. Thus, the Convention says that the total tonnage of military vessels of non-Black Sea states in the Black Sea cannot exceed 30 thousand tons (with the possibility of increasing to 45 thousand tons in the case of an increase in naval forces of the Black Sea countries). At the same time, the tenure of military ships of non-Black Sea states limits 21 to days.

If the United States easily tears up the INF Treaty, then they may well push through the idea that the Montreux Convention is not necessary to be observed. How will Turkey react to this, given that someone’s refusal to comply with the Montreux Convention automatically casts doubt on Turkish sovereignty over the straits mentioned above?
  • Facebook
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    12 November 2018 06: 21
    They can ascribe ships to the NATO Black Sea countries with mixed crews. Naturally, the captain is an American.
    1. +2
      12 November 2018 06: 55
      Quote: Severski

      They can ascribe ships to the NATO Black Sea countries with mixed crews. Naturally, the captain is an American.

      wassat fool
      1. -3
        12 November 2018 08: 04
        The fact that you did not think of it does not mean anything.
        1. 0
          12 November 2018 18: 15
          You yourself strain your ISK, i.e. mixed crews ?! I mean the captain is American !!! On a Romanian ship ?! Yes, there is less than a percent in English understands, not to mention American Romanian ... The fact that the ship’s captain has been trained for 10 years, I understand this is a wild secret for you. If they did so, it would be the best gift to our Black Sea Fleet, over the last 100 years of its existence.
          1. -1
            13 November 2018 06: 42
            there will be only Romanian cook, he does not need to know English.
  2. +2
    12 November 2018 06: 27
    Did you promise one and a half? You can not read further.
    1. +1
      12 November 2018 07: 55
      At the same time, Stepan Poltorak said that Russia "may resort to aggressive actions in the Black Sea"
      from the south - everything is clear

      and what in Polesie can oppose us?
      except dumplings and hohlushek what?
      1. +1
        12 November 2018 08: 28
        There they rule the USA, and these only talking heads and no more ...
      2. -3
        12 November 2018 09: 54
        NATO countries in the Black Sea are not like allies of Ukraine, but rather so that monkeys with a grenade and a fool do not cause trouble.
        1. +2
          12 November 2018 12: 31
          Quote: tihonmarine
          NATO countries in the Black Sea are not like allies of Ukraine, but rather so that monkeys with a grenade and a fool do not cause trouble.

          NATO, as a military bloc, exists solely for the sake of one goal and task: to confront Russia. NATO is moving towards the borders of Russia with only one goal - to confront Russia. What kind of monkey with some kind of grenade are you talking about?
  3. +5
    12 November 2018 06: 30
    Much depends on the principle of Turkey in the implementation of the Montreux and Erdogan conventions. Turkey passes warships of non-Black Sea powers into the waters of the Black Sea and back. It’s just that Turkey sometimes needs to be prompted that foreign ships have accumulated in the sea more than they should and it’s time to put them out. hi
    1. 0
      12 November 2018 10: 40
      Quote: bessmertniy
      Much depends on the principle of Turkey in the implementation of the Montreux and Erdogan conventions.

      Well, how will Erdogan take it and generally block the Bosphorus for warships of non-Black Sea countries? laughing
      1. 0
        12 November 2018 15: 25
        Quote: helmi8
        Well, how will Erdogan take it and generally block the Bosphorus for warships of non-Black Sea countries?

        The Montreux Convention, EMNIP, permits this only during the war - but also in the presence of some serious threats to Turkey’s security, so if he really wants to, he can try it!
  4. +2
    12 November 2018 06: 41
    Promise much to fulfill, FIG. How familiar we all are!
  5. +2
    12 November 2018 06: 44
    How will Turkey respond to this, given that someone’s refusal to comply with the Montreux Convention automatically casts doubt on Turkish sovereignty over the straits indicated above?
    How can it be ... the Turkish sultan will be against ... for him, such conversations as a red rag for the bull ... what kind of sultan will agree to limit his power in his territory and we need to use these fully to the extent of that and against Poroshenko.
  6. -6
    12 November 2018 06: 44
    Again, Basurin pumps.
  7. +1
    12 November 2018 06: 57
    The tearful generals, admirals, the tearful Parsley ... only all those offended and lowered from tears and grief can generate a lot of blood in the end before the election. Parsley has nothing to lose, he is definitely waiting for him if not a loop then a prison, because he is ready for anything, like a cornered patsuk.
  8. +3
    12 November 2018 06: 57
    Minister of Defense of Ukraine. Learn to resist cockroaches in your head and then, perhaps, orderlies with a straitjacket, well, or as an option, a scaffold with an executioner, you will not need. request what laughing
  9. 0
    12 November 2018 07: 13
    I ask you, do not scare us with this Moldovan!
  10. +1
    12 November 2018 07: 16
    Here do not go to the "fortuneteller." As soon as Ukraine expands its economic zone twice and tries to take advantage of this, as soon as Russia will begin to take "aggressive actions" so that Ukraine "appetites" would be reduced.
  11. +2
    12 November 2018 07: 33
    "Ukrainian Supreme Zrada cancels the Montreux convention." Artist Poltorak.
  12. +1
    12 November 2018 07: 43
    If you replace Russia in the sayings of the interim government of Ukraine with Mars, then everything is immediately clear laughing
  13. +2
    12 November 2018 07: 44
    The Papuans have Krivoy Rog without light and heat, half a million people freeze .... Their "answer to the Turkish sultan"?
  14. +3
    12 November 2018 07: 53
    So far, these are just "empty promises" ... The United States has no reason to climb with its "Arleigh Burks" into the Black Sea, which is being shot through by our means up and down. Moreover, the rest of NATO members will not go there en masse.
    As for ukroflot - to drown without pity, in case of any provocations ... In 2008, Georgia also "jumped" on the fence.
    1. -1
      12 November 2018 08: 29
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      The United States has no reason to climb its "Arleigh Burkes" into the Black Sea, which is being shot by our means up and down.

      What are you? But what is it that these Berks constantly do, if there is no reason !!!!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -3
        12 November 2018 08: 44
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        what are these Berks doing there all the time if there is no reason

        Hope for the best.

        While there is no war, they swim there. In which case, they will drown there.
        1. -1
          12 November 2018 09: 30
          Quote: Consultant
          While there is no war, they swim there. In which case, they will drown there.

          laughing laughing Do you personally promise this? wassat in case of war there will be an exchange of vigorous clubs
          1. -3
            12 November 2018 10: 03
            Quote: Tiksi-3
            there will be an exchange of vigorous clubs

            Funny phrase. So right with batons and change? wink

            Objections to what was said (absolutely right) - is there?

            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            The United States has no reason to climb its "Arleigh Burkes" into the Black Sea, which is being shot by our means up and down

            If not, what is the conversation then?
        2. 0
          12 November 2018 09: 59
          Well, do they want war or ???
      3. 0
        12 November 2018 10: 18
        Well, there’s no war yet. They come, they go there, they go. Not prohibited. Neither by contracts are by us. The question is whether they will go there under the conditions of the pre-war time.
  15. +1
    12 November 2018 08: 05
    Poltorak "South-North" threatens? And the threat grew with 2,5 rusty kayaks in the Ukrainian fleet?
  16. +1
    12 November 2018 08: 09
    Poltorak --- "Exactly ready (to resist Russia) ..." - only the head of the game of "Zarnitsa" in the primary grades, or a finished one ... can reason. Even hoping for help from outside, everything will be destroyed in a short time (the ratio of weapons in the region). Well, the Bosphorus, if Turkey violates the treaty, then this funnel will not be closed for a long time, with the same calibers, or what is more serious.
  17. 0
    12 November 2018 08: 20
    In order to carry out some actions in the Black Sea, you must first find it on the map. And here is where it is: in the South-North or in the East-West, here is the question of the questions! laughing
  18. 0
    12 November 2018 09: 23
    Most importantly, do not become a stutter after the answer. And then it happens.
  19. 0
    12 November 2018 10: 22
    I hope they start right away and fight with us on a serious one and with China and with all the others (stupidly yelling that they are in charge and waving their hands). It seems this is already starting.
  20. 0
    12 November 2018 12: 28
    We completely forgot "after all, it was the Ukrainians who dug the Black Sea" - so they are expanding because they consider it theirs)))))
  21. 0
    12 November 2018 15: 38
    You can not ignore such statements ukro-fascists? In fact, they can arrange various provocations at sea. And Russia is not ready to apply Israeli tactics ...
  22. The comment was deleted.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"