Military Review

In the USA: China has sharply increased its power while we are at war with terrorism

93
The American press published an article by Colonel Wesley Hollman, Vice-President of the National Defense Industry Association of the United States, who reflects on the military power of China that has grown many times in recent years. Colonel Hallman, who served in the American army 27 for years, believes that the Chinese owe their present power ... to the United States of America.


The argument of Hallman in this case is as follows.

US 11 September 2001, underwent a terrorist attack. After that, the American military budget was drafted in such a way that a substantial part of it was directed to the implementation of antiterrorist operations in Afghanistan. Then the United States began to “look for chemical weapon"In Iraq, bringing their troops there and bogged down in the war. The United States continued to confront international terrorism, infusing more and more new funds. At the same time, the national debt continued to grow and today it is already striving for 22 trillion dollars.

Based on this, Hallman concludes: China simply took advantage of the fact that no one has been holding it back all these years. He increased his military component, updated the technical fleet of the army, acquiring new weapons.

In the USA: China has sharply increased its power while we are at war with terrorism


Colonel Hallman:
We can say that Japan won the First World War, because it used the diversion of European forces to expand its influence in the Asia-Pacific region. So it is now. China took advantage of the situation and expanded its sphere of influence. He captured the islands to create military outposts on them.


Today, as Hallman notes, China’s economy is already second, but it is striving to become the first in the world.

According to the vice president of the National Defense Industry Association of the United States, while America was burning up resources, fighting international terrorism, China achieved 600% growth in military spending and is seeking dominance.
Photos used:
PRC Ministry of Defense
93 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 10 November 2018 14: 28
    +29
    Fought terrorism or created controlled chaos, creating terrorism?
    Then the US began to “look for chemical weapons”

    And what, have you found? Test-tube Powell shocked the UN and a couple of million lives at a loss.
    The USA is the main world terrorist.
    1. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 10 November 2018 14: 37
      +6
      Quote: NEXUS
      Fought terrorism or created controlled chaos, creating terrorism?

      From the language removed ... yes good
      1. 210ox
        210ox 10 November 2018 14: 41
        +7
        They fought ... Spawned terrorists around the world ..
        1. cniza
          cniza 10 November 2018 15: 56
          +3
          They made and are making money in the war ...
        2. Mr Credo
          Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 11
          +6
          while America burned resources while fighting international terrorism, China has achieved a 600% increase in military spending and is striving to dominate. ### They fought ... Brought terrorists around the world .. ### Well, the American himself answered (in the first two lines) they fought international terrorism, but modestly kept silent that they fought with terrorists for the interests of American capital! In the fight against terrorists, capital would suffer and suffer losses. And what did the Americans lose? Afghan began to grow opium. Iraq and Libya have fallen. Syria is on fire. Where is the US suffering? But from a joint war with terrorists, the whole region and others are on the way very successfully! Is it really bad for the states if problems grow and multiply in other countries and regions of US competitors? The task of the states is to create problems for competitors, weakening them with problems. And they are doing this very successfully and the money they spent is not in vain. The whole problem of the states and China is that the states could not create problems for China. Separatism did not take root in China. On the transport routes to China, no war breaks out. There are almost no wars in countries supplying raw materials to China. This is what the American is annoyed with. They scrambled digging holes in China, and he successfully passed them! It's a shame however!
          1. Arh
            Arh 10 November 2018 16: 56
            +2
            And now all the mattresses can’t catch FIGs in China, and now peer off into the sartir !!! tongue wassat laughing
            1. Machito
              Machito 10 November 2018 17: 13
              +2
              The USA is the successor of Fascist Germany with the emblem of the Roman Empire. RF - Byzantine Empire with a double-headed eagle
    2. Herald of the Revolution
      Herald of the Revolution 10 November 2018 14: 45
      -12
      Quote: NEXUS
      Test tube Powell shocked at UN

      Well, if, according to you, they lied even at the UN, what prevented them from lying again and still finding (planting) chemical weapons in Iraq? By the way, there was such an uncle who lived there in Iraq, "chemical Ali", he was nicknamed, do you know for what such merits they called him that? So it was not a lie on the part of the United States, but rather a gross mistake ...
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 10 November 2018 14: 53
        +11
        Quote: Herald of Revia
        Well, if they were even lying to the UN in your opinion, then what prevented them from lying again and still finding (toss) chemical weapons in Iraq?

        To ask such a question, you first need to understand what you are asking ...
        On October 25, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair acknowledged in an interview with CNN that the invasion of America and its allies in Iraq in 2003 was one of the reasons for the emergence of the Islamic State terrorist organization (its activities are banned in Russia) and apologized for the mistakes made.

        Secondly..
        Colin Powell, who held the post of US Secretary of State at the time of the invasion of Iraq, demanded that the CIA and the Pentagon explain why they had not warned him about the unreliability of the main source of information about Saddam Hussein having biological weapons.

        The Guardian newspaper revealed that the source, named Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, who received the pseudonym “Curveball” from his German and American curators, admitted to lying. He said that he had fabricated his testimony about the Iraqi secret biological weapons program. In response to the information in this publication, Powell said that all questions should be addressed to the American departments, which were preparing the basis for the outbreak of war.

        Thirdly..
        Powell previously expressed regret over the role that he unwittingly played, reporting false information to the UN. He said it became a black spot on his career. But in his recent statements, he began to put pressure on the intelligence agencies and their former leaders, demanding that they report what they knew at that time and why they did not reject such a bad source.

        And fourthly ... Tony Blair admitted that the invasion of Iraq and the annexation of England to the USA in this war were erroneous.
        And about ..
        Quote: Herald of Revia
        So it was not a lie from the United States, but rather a blunder ...

        These were pure lies, as the source of information was unreliable and the CIA knew about this several years before.
        1. Rurikovich
          Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 02
          +4
          Quote: NEXUS
          These were pure lies, as the source of information was unreliable and the CIA knew about this several years before.

          "Onizhedeti" winked This is what Herald of Revius most likely means lol And continuing his thought - maybe we will forgive America what wassat They are white and fluffy ... Well, by their nature, they cannot lie, for they bring light in the form of democracy to the masses bully
          For members of the forum - this is sarcasm, a joke yes laughing
          1. Mr Credo
            Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 15
            0
            Yes, we know about white and fluffy! Who is this white and fluffy? This is a fox baby! wassat
        2. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 10 November 2018 15: 11
          +4
          Andrei hi I get the impression that nothing in this world happens without the participation of the USA ... wink
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 10 November 2018 15: 14
            +4
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Andrei hi I get the impression that nothing in this world happens without the participation of the USA ... wink

            pasha hi Do you get the impression? There has long been certainty. Moreover, mattresses themselves speak in plain text about this.
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 10 November 2018 15: 16
              +3
              Do not carp at the words ...
      2. Bykov.
        Bykov. 10 November 2018 15: 07
        +3
        Quote: Herald of Revy

        Well, if, according to you, they lied even at the UN, what prevented them from lying again and still finding (planting) chemical weapons in Iraq? By the way, there was such an uncle who lived there in Iraq, "chemical Ali", he was nicknamed, do you know for what such merits they called him that? So it was not a lie on the part of the United States, but rather a gross mistake ...

        And who gave Iraq XO? Of course, in order to spend the Iranians? But still who? And why, when that same Chemical Ali, poisoned the Kurds, the entire advanced world community, led by the USA, simply kept quiet, unlike the USSR? And with the test tube at the UN, there was no mistake - it was a deliberate lie.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 10 November 2018 15: 08
          +1
          Quote: Bulls.
          And who gave Iraq XO?

          It was not a chemical weapon, but a biological one ...
          He said that he had fabricated his testimony about the Iraqi secret program to create biological weapons.
      3. arhPavel
        arhPavel 10 November 2018 15: 33
        +3
        Well, if you think they even lied to the UN

        /Hand face
        "... according to your ... according to your ..."
        lived there in Iraq such an uncle "chemical Ali" was nicknamed him, do you know for what such merits they called him that?

        We are in the know. And not only we, everyone who wants to can find information who supplied equipment and resources for the production of chemical weapons there, who incited them to use, and who used the VETO right in the UN Security Council.
        And you, in my opinion, are not.

        It's just a tin plate that people have in their head.
        No words are simple.
      4. rocket757
        rocket757 10 November 2018 15: 58
        +3
        To Powell shook a test tube with a biological, such as anthrax. What does this have to do with chemical Ali? Like all this all the same WMD?
        Quote: Herald of Revia
        By the way, such an uncle lived there in Iraq "chemical Ali" he was nicknamed

        All the same, the story is muddy, the stripes just act as they want and how they can! That’s the whole dilemma, it will be so in our world until the horns are broken.
      5. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 10 November 2018 19: 40
        0
        Quote: Herald of Revia
        So it was not a lie on the part of the United States, but rather a gross mistake ....

        And yet it was a lie. In 2003, on February 5, Powell was shaking a test tube at the UN, and on May 17, he made a statement that - "The information provided by the CIA on the production of biological weapons in Iraq was inaccurate and deliberately misleading, which makes me deeply disappointed and regret it." But the war in Iraq has already been going on since March 20 ...
    3. GibSoN
      GibSoN 10 November 2018 21: 47
      -1
      Fought terrorism or created controlled chaos, creating terrorism?
      You should write scientific dissertations ... Any order is the power of power! Miracles happen only in a fairy tale. Tell us how to create a world in the world, without offending anyone? Or Stalin, a wizard hero, created blessings and everyone in the dandelions bathed?

      PS At the same time, I want to note that I personally have nothing against Stalin! Just stating a fact.
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 10 November 2018 22: 10
        0
        Quote: GibSoN
        Any order is the power of power!

        And tell me, dear, for 70 years of the existence of the USSR in Europe, at least somewhere there was a war?
        Or for example ... Vietnam, which was flooded with mattresses by napalm. Was everyone happy from such a democracy? You can recall Korea .. And in the same Iraq, by the power of Washington what was created?
        Strength, power, strife. And the chaos, even controlled (although this is toftology, maybe chaos cannot be controlled in principle) of the USSR and now the Russian Federation once projected onto other countries?
        1. GibSoN
          GibSoN 12 November 2018 19: 02
          -1
          And tell me, dear, for 70 years of the existence of the USSR in Europe, at least somewhere there was a war?
          You better tell me, dear, what, after the collapse of the USSR in Europe, the war began?
          Or for example ...
          No template examples needed. Vietnam and Korea happened not without the participation of the USSR. In Soviet times, there were at least as many hot spots as they are now, they just weren’t written about in the Izvestia newspaper ...
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 12 November 2018 19: 10
            0
            Quote: GibSoN
            You better tell me, dear, what, after the collapse of the USSR in Europe, the war began?

            And in Ukraine, what do you think? And in Yugoslavia, what was this?
            Quote: GibSoN
            No template examples needed. Vietnam and Korea happened not without the participation of the USSR.

            Seriously? Dear, you don’t have to make candy out of excrement ... not the USSR, but the USA got into Vietnam and Korea. And the Union just didn’t allow these countries to not be gouged into the trash.

            Quote: GibSoN
            In Soviet times, there were at least as many hot spots as they are now, they just weren’t written about in the Izvestia newspaper ...

            Get out of the way ... hot spots created highways, and we just answered. Afghanistan say ... so in those days, drug trafficking was reduced by several times, and the Union built schools and roads and hydroelectric power stations there ... and what the USA built in Afghanistan for this time, do not tell me, citizen?
            1. GibSoN
              GibSoN 12 November 2018 19: 16
              -1
              And in Ukraine, what do you think? And in Yugoslavia, what was this?
              Exactly what was when the USSR was. This also applies to all other examples. Conflict of ideologies and interests.
              Afghanistan you say ... so in those days, drug trafficking was reduced significantly, and the Union built schools and roads and hydroelectric power stations there ... and what the USA built in Afghanistan during this time
              Well, if you are so knowledgeable, tell us what the USA was built there ?! You can even use Google’s enemy ..
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 12 November 2018 19: 17
                0
                Quote: GibSoN
                Exactly what was when the USSR was.

                The congress is counted.
                1. GibSoN
                  GibSoN 12 November 2018 19: 19
                  -1
                  The congress is counted.
                  You really thought that I would discuss with you about this ?! )) Well, it's just funny! Believe in anything. The time of the 50-70s has almost passed.
    4. Alex20042004
      Alex20042004 11 November 2018 19: 35
      +1
      The USA is the main sponsor of terrorists around the world.
  2. A good one
    A good one 10 November 2018 14: 35
    +3
    "... America was burning resources in the fight against international terrorism."

    Paper was made of wood, and wrappers were printed from it with dead presidents. smile
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 November 2018 14: 36
    +2
    How quickly create the image of the enemy! They themselves raised a dragon on the border with Russia, and now they are afraid of their own brainchild? Is it too late?
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 23
      +1
      Are you scared? And what harm did the dragons do to the Americans? How do Americans suffer from them? If IS is an enemy of the United States, then why the United States does not impose sanctions against them? Where is the overlap of financial flows and freezing accounts? Where are the sanctions against individuals and companies collaborating with the IG? Or is this unknown to the states? And why do states save the lives of IS leaders? Can Americans answer these questions?
  4. pvv113
    pvv113 10 November 2018 14: 38
    +10
    while America burned resources fighting international terrorism

    How states are fighting terrorism has long been clear to everyone
  5. Susanin
    Susanin 10 November 2018 14: 39
    +1
    China has dramatically increased power while we fought terrorism

    About Russians, as always, not a single word ha ha ha
    If only China had mated with the West, and we would have supplied weapons to them as well .. And the USA is also for S-300 gold And (import))))))
    1. spektr9
      spektr9 10 November 2018 21: 20
      0
      But the Russian Federation has dramatically increased power? It’s more profitable to fight with a weaker rival, so now all the hacking in Russia
  6. Ros 56
    Ros 56 10 November 2018 14: 41
    0
    Pontovils are cheap, you didn’t fight terrorism, but sawed loot under the guise of fighting against barmales. And now they tell tales to the whole world, and their lackeys howl after them like jackals.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 10 November 2018 19: 38
      0
      They really fought and continue to fight terrorism! In place of what would fight against terrorism.
  7. Lara Croft
    Lara Croft 10 November 2018 14: 43
    +7
    So it is now. China took advantage of the situation and expanded its sphere of influence. He captured the islands to create military outposts on them.

    Did he capture them today?
    He was building up his military component, updating the army’s technical park, acquiring new weapons.

    Exaggeration. Most of the compounds of the SV PLA are infantry units with a small number of armored infantry fighting vehicles (approximately 40-50 armored personnel carriers / infantry fighting vehicles per division) and exercises recently held in the Russian Federation and in the picture to the article showed that the PLA’s military unit was not provided with bulletproof vests ... 80% of the combat aircraft fleet are 3rd generation aircraft. The only thing where the rapid growth of modern military equipment is felt is the Navy.
  8. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 10 November 2018 14: 43
    +1
    After that, the US military budget was imposed in such a way that a substantial part of it was aimed at carrying out anti-terrorist operations in Afghanistan.
    The presence of the American army with allies in Afghanistan can also be viewed as a measure of limiting Chinese expansion. By blocking this strategic "corridor", they thereby opened a "Second Front" against China. For these reasons, the Chinese are trying to get closer to the Pakistanis, and in Afghanistan itself, the Chinese support for the Taliban is felt All the more acute. Worked out schemes since the Soviet war in this country. Where do you think the guerrillas are fed from? China through a dummy agent Pakistan.
    1. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 08
      +1
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      The presence of the American army with allies in Afghanistan can also be considered as a measure of limitation of Chinese expansion.

      The presence of the American army in Afghanistan should be seen primarily as a defense of their interests in the form of the destruction of the Taliban, which really fought against drug trafficking and almost destroyed the drug business of Afghanistan. Tolgo silly will not notice that the American army actually protects the opium poppy plantings, which, after defeating the Taliban, have grown by orders of magnitude, and only then does what they attribute to it various sorts of esperds and analysts - China opposes or fights terrorism there yes
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 10 November 2018 15: 10
        +2
        And you do not find that the amount spent on the Afghan campaign is many times higher than the profit from the poppy?
        1. Rurikovich
          Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 17
          +3
          Those who thought through a scam to solve all the problems of America with the war against the so-called terrorism, think differently. Dividends are much higher than costs. They tell you about the costs, what would you think as they need.
          How many years has the US been in Afghanistan? Do you think they are heroically fighting bearded men?
          1. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 10 November 2018 15: 24
            +1
            It’s hard to convince me with one picture. Are you aware that the cost of this war is already reaching $ 1.5 trillion? How many fields do you need to plant in order to stay in profit?
            1. Rurikovich
              Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 36
              +1
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Are you aware that the cost of this war is already reaching $ 1.5 trillion? What do you think, how many of these fields need to be planted in order to remain in profit?

              what Read
              In Afghanistan itself, the cultivation and production of drugs has become rampant. Afghanistan now accounts for 90% of global opium production. Last fall, Afghan peasants harvested 6,7 tons of opium, from which 375 tons of heroin can be produced. According to the Minister for Combating Drugs of Afghanistan, Zorar Ahmad Mokbel, about 240 tons of heroin will be exported through Iran and Pakistan, and about 110 tons through Central Asian countries. According to the UN, revenue from Afghan drug exports last year reached $ 2,4 billion, representing 15% of Afghanistan’s GDP.
              And the picture doesn’t lie about the real godfather of Afghanistan
              It's only over a year, Karl! 2,4 billion green American tugriks for 2012. Now is the 18th in the yard. How many have arrived hypothetically in six years? repeat
              You will be told about losses while modestly keeping silent about profits. that’s how public opinion is formed when they don’t want to think wink hi
              1. Thunderbolt
                Thunderbolt 10 November 2018 15: 45
                +1
                I am not Karl. hi ) Somehow weak. Some kind of pathetic billions against trillions. And it is very curious that the Americans sent part of the traffic through Iran. Or it’s still not the CIA, but everyone who can nibble off their piece /// without excluding the Americans / //? Count on the calculator when such a military campaign pays off. N and a yo. Hence, the conclusion is that the United States primarily pursues geostrategic goals in Afghanistan to maintain and develop its influence. The proceeds of the drug look very small compared to the amount spent the bad guys from the Pentagon to this event.
                1. Rurikovich
                  Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 56
                  0
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  I am not Karl.

                  But "Thunderbolt" is also not a name wink smile
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  Somehow weak. Some kind of pathetic billions against trillions.

                  I am begging you! laughing A country that does not hesitate to lie on every corner will tell the truth about the costs and at the same time continue to sit in a country that causes them losses !?
                  I personally do not believe yes This is the same as talking about the lack of funds for the disposal of their chemical weapons with a military budget of 700 trillion. tugriks and printing non-stop new money smile
            2. URAL72
              URAL72 10 November 2018 15: 42
              +1
              Stormbreaker! It's simple - the money comes from the budget, and the profits from the drug trade, into the pockets. Everything is the same as ours - government spending with a flick of a magic pen turns into personal income of officials.
              1. Thunderbolt
                Thunderbolt 10 November 2018 15: 53
                0
                I can agree that they have a good share, but that’s not the main goal of the war. They went to the rear immediately to three of their opponents. China, Iran and our Southern Military District sense this with genes.
                1. URAL72
                  URAL72 10 November 2018 16: 18
                  0
                  This end does not justify the means. There are no serious weapons that could threaten us. The goals you specified are present, but secondary. The main thing is the response to the blow to America, terrorism is really a screen. They dug a hole for themselves, savoring the "flight of the Soviets" from Afghanistan, but how do they leave? But I think it will have to be under the new administration. Then we will have a taste, although we are still fine - the annual costs for one Afghan alone are higher than our defense budget.
            3. Setrac
              Setrac 10 November 2018 16: 03
              +2
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Are you aware that the cost of this war is already reaching $ 1.5 trillion?

              This is a hoax, Americans haven’t spent so much on Afghanistan, trim the sturgeon.
          2. Mr Credo
            Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 27
            0
            And what? Don't they fight bearded men? Opium from Afghanistan seems to be taken out by US Army aircraft. Or bearded men on his donkeys being taken to Europe?
  9. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 10 November 2018 14: 45
    +3
    Everything in the "world" (read - English-speaking) media is written in such a way that one cannot see the forest behind the three pines. The material is presented in such a way that the true culprits of all evil acts in the world are called righteous, and the innocent are indicated as guilty. The population learns not to think with their brains, but to believe what is said to them from above. That's why it turned out that terrorism began to be cultivated after the 9/11 staging, then Powell's test tube followed, then Hussein's accusations, the Arab spring staging ... Voila - an oil painting ... Terrorism is marching across the planet lol request
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 36
      0
      And human lives are thrown into this fire chamber of world terrorism as a tail for fire! There, in the name of whose interests is this world revolution going?
  10. HAM
    HAM 10 November 2018 14: 51
    0
    One question: when do you did not fight with "terrorism" ??
  11. parusnik
    parusnik 10 November 2018 14: 57
    +1
    Nyadaya, did not keep track of China, the terrorists did not give ... funded by the United States ... got out of control .. laughing
  12. Waldemar
    Waldemar 10 November 2018 14: 58
    +1
    They created chaos, robbed oil and did drug trafficking,
  13. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 10 November 2018 15: 02
    +4
    These are not related things. The general is wrong. The Chinese army has grown sharply, but strictly in proportion to the sharp growth of the economy.
    The fight against terrorism has allowed the United States in combat to master dozens of new types of precision weapons.
    The same valuable experience as Russia has in Syria.
    These weapons and systems will also be effective in wars against regular armies. So that
    the Americans have nothing to cry.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 10 November 2018 15: 11
      +3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      So
      the Americans have nothing to cry.

      They do not cry, but catch up on hysteria, replacing concepts and hiding their involvement in the entire mess that they have spread in the world.
    2. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 21
      +3
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The fight against terrorism has allowed the United States in combat to master dozens of new types of precision weapons.

      American weapons hit the target for sure wink

      Alex, America itself has created the conditions for the creation and testing of its weapons and the establishment of its order in the world. Only the blind do not see it yes hi
    3. sabakina
      sabakina 10 November 2018 15: 29
      0
      voyaka uh, which ones? "daddy of all bombs"? Which, in fact, did not bring visible success .... It would be better to keep silent!
    4. Setrac
      Setrac 10 November 2018 16: 07
      +1
      From this
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The fight against terrorism has allowed the United States in combat to master dozens of new types of precision weapons.

      it should not
      Quote: voyaka uh
      These weapons and systems will also be effective in wars against regular armies. So the Americans have nothing to cry.

      Quote: voyaka uh
      The same valuable experience as Russia has in Syria.

      This is a valuable experience in Russia in Syria - because behind the back of the terrorists are the United States and Israel with their technologies, behind the partisans with whom the Americans are fighting and there is no one particularly valuable experience.
    5. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 42
      +1
      It's right. Local wars allow you to create weapons, practice tactics, logistics in real time!
  14. K-50
    K-50 10 November 2018 15: 16
    +1
    In the USA: China has sharply increased its power while we are at war with terrorism

    Correct, did not fight terrorism, but nurtured. So true. yes
  15. Naughty
    Naughty 10 November 2018 15: 18
    -2
    Quote: bouncyhunter
    Andrei hi I get the impression that nothing in this world happens without the participation of the USA ... wink

    So who raised the retirement age in Russia am It turns out that our State Duma has nothing to do with it. And we sinned on them lol
  16. sabakina
    sabakina 10 November 2018 15: 18
    0
    I do not understand, the USA cannot defeat terrorists in slippers. How are they going to fight a nuclear power? The whole world in trash is our chip. What kind of them?
    1. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 10 November 2018 15: 26
      0
      Quote: sabakina
      The whole world in trash is our chip. What kind of them?

      "What for us?" wink
    2. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 45
      +3
      Well, already won the nuclear power. No more USSR. And they defeated the donkey loaded with gold. So which weapon did the most devastating blow, nuclear or donkey?
  17. Samara_63
    Samara_63 10 November 2018 15: 28
    +1
    The Chinese economy is entirely dependent on foreign markets, unlike the United States ... The PLA is strong, but it will not enter the top five if you do not take nuclear weapons ...
  18. Samara_63
    Samara_63 10 November 2018 15: 29
    -1
    War is soon inevitable, so Russia needs to take Kiev! And strike in the Baltic states, Poland, Romania ...
    1. Mr Credo
      Mr Credo 10 November 2018 16: 49
      -1
      Striking is not a problem. The problem will be later, because the economy will need to be supported and developed. And we have problems with this. The industry is all ruined.
      1. Samara_63
        Samara_63 10 November 2018 16: 52
        -1
        If we don’t apply, then they will apply to us ...
        Then what will happen? It’s hard to say, but it will definitely be better when they put it on us ...
        1. Mr Credo
          Mr Credo 10 November 2018 17: 20
          +1
          What is the point for us to strike at them?
          1. Samara_63
            Samara_63 10 November 2018 17: 51
            -1
            To preempt a blow to us
    2. Keyser soze
      Keyser soze 10 November 2018 19: 14
      +1
      And strike in the Baltic states, Poland, Romania ...


      It is necessary to have a bite ....
  19. XXXIII
    XXXIII 10 November 2018 15: 51
    0
    In the USA: China has sharply increased its power while we are at war with terrorism
    They fought against Russia, not against terrorism, and China did not sleep, but saw all this d ....., but armed like the Roman Empire ..... hi
  20. Operator
    Operator 10 November 2018 15: 51
    0
    For the information of the Vice President of the National Defense Industry Association of the USA, Colonel Wesley Hallman, you yourself financed the creation of the military-industrial potential of China, making it the main trading partner of America laughing
  21. lucul
    lucul 10 November 2018 16: 25
    0
    Quote: bouncyhunter
    Andrei hi I get the impression that nothing in this world happens without the participation of the USA ... wink

    No need to put the cart in front of the horse - in this world nothing happens without the participation of the Zionists - it will be more accurate. The USA is just a tool, like a hammer or screwdriver.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 11 November 2018 11: 25
      +1
      There is such an old joke smile (and he is about you, including):
      "The Tutumutu tribe heard nothing about the Jews and blamed the evil forces of nature for all their troubles."
  22. ser65
    ser65 10 November 2018 17: 25
    0
    and laughter and sin ....
  23. APASUS
    APASUS 10 November 2018 17: 33
    +1
    It’s bad that China cannot be pulled straight to the events of September 11, otherwise it would have been all weird! Degeneration of the military elite in person.
  24. bald
    bald 10 November 2018 17: 34
    0
    Well, are they not mocked - "fighters" against terrorism. China, at least, did not do that. And he armed himself from people like them, though mainly using other people's developments, and did not care about patents.
  25. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 10 November 2018 18: 29
    0
    Something I no longer understand, is Trump an agent of Putin or Jinping? Or (oh, horror!) Double agent? laughing
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 10 November 2018 19: 50
      0
      He is a triple agent! Not as much fighting for the interests of Russia and China, how many are trying to save the United States from a deep-seated USA that wants to get rid of all of humanity, which began to interfere with their plans and desires.
  26. The comment was deleted.
    1. GibSoN
      GibSoN 10 November 2018 22: 03
      -2
      China will show Americans Kuzkin's mother again!
      Does Trump pay you your salary? Or maybe he is crap in the doorway? Do you also pay taxes in the USA? Why so much attention to the USA ?! Do you really think that in the long run, the USA is influencing your life more than China ?! China may show Kuzkin’s mother, but rest assured that this very mother will personally affect you first of all. Start thinking about yourself, not about how it is in the USA or China.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 10 November 2018 22: 15
      +2
      Quote: rudolff
      China will show Americans Kuzkin's mother again!
      The participant of the 100 parade on Red Square in Moscow in the 1972 year ... But he did not see such perfection of drill training ...
      CHICK AS BEAUTIFUL !!! fellow
      Rudolph, thanks! drinks
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 11 November 2018 14: 35
            +1
            Quote: rudolff
            The combat step "in the knee" is a little different, paid attention?

            Of course I did!
            We have a "Prussian school": a straight leg at the knee and from the hip!
            One can feel the long "blood connection" between the Romanovs and the Hohenzollerns ... laughing
            But ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
  27. GibSoN
    GibSoN 10 November 2018 21: 59
    -1
    Absolutely sound reasoning. Actually, this is visible and so ... RF, all that remains is to brag about different things, so that at least some kind of attention would be paid. In general, the Russian Federation chose the smallest path for its losses. Confrontation with the West and friendship with China .. If it were the other way around, everything would be very sad.
  28. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 November 2018 02: 20
    +1
    In the USA: China has dramatically increased power, while we fought terrorism

    ... we plowed, said a fly sitting on a horse ... laughing ...
  29. Baloo
    Baloo 12 November 2018 06: 40
    0
    In the USA: China has sharply increased its power while we are at war with terrorism

    Error in title? belay
    China has dramatically increased military and economic power in response to US sponsorship and support of terrorists in the Middle East region and preparations for a nuclear war against Russia and China. yes
  30. Pacifist
    Pacifist 12 November 2018 08: 13
    0
    While the United States was engaged in a pretentious fight against terrorism sponsored by them, moreover, by dumbness and cruelty, surpassing their fosterlings, the others, having looked at this lawlessness, began to strengthen the Armed Forces, which was quite expected by all but stubborn in the United States.