American Boeing P-8A conducted reconnaissance near the Kerch Strait

35
Anti-submarine aircraft Boeing P-8A Poseidon of the US Navy (Patrol Squadron VP-10 Red Lancers) on Tuesday conducted a reconnaissance flight in the area of ​​the Kerch Strait, reported the monitoring resource PlaneRadar in Twitter.





It is reported that the Boeing P-8A with the on-board number 168764 is part of the US Navy's 10 patrol squadron. The plane approached the coastline of the Crimean peninsula at a distance of 25-35 km.

According to the information, on the same day before the arrival of the Boeing, a reconnaissance in the region was conducted by a strategic RQ-4A Global Hawk UAV, the US Air Force, which is based on Sigonella air base, located in Italy. Performing the mission, the drone began by circling the contact line in the Donbass, then went into the airspace over the Black Sea.

Recently, the activity of US and NATO aircraft conducting reconnaissance near the Russian borders has noticeably increased. In particular, their flights were recorded both in the Black Sea region (Crimea and the Krasnodar Territory) and at the western borders of Russia.

Moscow has repeatedly called on Washington to refuse such flights, but the US administration has consistently responded with a refusal.

The Boeing P-8 Poseidon multipurpose marine aircraft is designed to detect and destroy enemy submarines in patrol areas. It is also used for reconnaissance, participation in anti-ship and rescue operations. It can operate both in coastal areas and in the World Ocean. At the core of its design is the Boeing 737-800. Crew - 9 man, including 7 operators. Combat radius - 3,7 thousand km (distillation range - 8,3 thousand km).

Total produced (as of July 2018 of the year) 96 units. Designed to replace the Lockheed P-3 Orion.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    7 November 2018 10: 56
    At last. Good old days are coming back :)))
    1. +1
      7 November 2018 12: 31
      Quote: AlexanderVP
      At last. Good old days are back

      Yes, something somehow ... "modestly" return recourse
      If the day before yesterday "Orion" was "shocked" as it should, then today what? ... After all, "Poseidon" practically "struck" with a plane along .... ".... The plane was approaching the coastline of the Crimean peninsula at a distance of 25-35 km.")
      What is it? "They overslept the air defense-shniki" .. so in my life I will not believe ... then the team from the top .... again "concerned" with the fact that upset the amers the day before yesterday and took their comments into consideration ..... act on the principle of tolerance is this our everything? wassat
      So I don’t see much reason for jokes soldier
    2. +1
      7 November 2018 13: 08
      Quote: AlexanderVP
      At last. Good old days are coming back :)))

      Why come back here, fly into the open sky, the Russian Federation did not forbid flying at its borders.
      NATO does it for Europe, but NATO is the Americans, so ours are most often watched at the borders of the Russian Federation, and that’s why the news on this topic doesn’t stall ..... winked
      For 2017, 34 states are parties to the Treaty. The Russian Federation ratified the Open Skies Treaty on May 26, 2001.
      1. +2
        7 November 2018 13: 11
        Quote: XXXIII
        Why come back here, fly into the open sky, the Russian Federation did not forbid flying at its borders.

        In the article it is written in Russian and white that "Moscow has repeatedly called on Washington to abandon such flights"." Open sky "is when they fly over territory of the country with inspection.
        1. 0
          7 November 2018 13: 22
          Quote: AlexanderVP
          Quote: XXXIII
          Why come back here, fly into the open sky, the Russian Federation did not forbid flying at its borders.

          In the article it is written in Russian and white that "Moscow has repeatedly called on Washington to abandon such flights"." Open sky "is when they fly over territory of the country with inspection.

          Not really, they fly where they see fit, because they choose areas for themselves that they consider dangerous or suspicious, Crimea is by the way the most armed peninsula on earth .... feel
          1. 0
            7 November 2018 13: 32
            Normal intelligence activity. Everyone is looking after everyone, listening to keep abreast of everything. Ours are also conducting reconnaissance of all potential "partners". All their planes, radio points, bases are under vigilant surveillance and wiretapping. And China, by the way, too.
            1. 0
              7 November 2018 15: 17
              Quote: ltc35
              Normal intelligence activity. Everyone is looking after everyone, listening to keep abreast of everything. Ours are also conducting reconnaissance of all potential "partners". All their planes, radio points, bases are under vigilant surveillance and wiretapping. And China, by the way, too.

              Yes, I agree so, of course, intelligence does not sleep ...
          2. 0
            7 November 2018 14: 49
            Quote: XXXIII
            Not quite so, they fly where they see fit, as they choose areas for themselves that they consider dangerous or suspicious

            Under the Open Skies treaty, they fly in the airspace of the inspected state, but only where they are allowed. And reconnaissance flies where it needs to, but not over the territory of the country.
      2. 0
        7 November 2018 14: 48
        Quote: XXXIII
        fly into the open sky frame

        "Open Sky" is a completely different song. Do not confuse contract monitoring and conventional intelligence. activity.
        1. 0
          7 November 2018 15: 24
          Quote: Piramidon
          Quote: XXXIII
          fly into the open sky frame

          "Open Sky" is a completely different song. Do not confuse contract monitoring and conventional intelligence. activity.

          I don’t argue, maybe another song, but I thought something that the MO just didn’t specify or at the mercy of the journalists threw off the information, and the media embellished it like a Christmas tree .......
          By the way, why didn’t they intercept, it was possible to put a P-8A reconnaissance somewhere, who will understand how this reconnaissance turned out to be in the Russian Federation, to force a look at tea, so to speak ....
          1. 0
            7 November 2018 15: 33
            Quote: XXXIII
            it was possible to put a P-8A scout somewhere, who will figure it out how this scout turned out to be on the territory of the Russian Federation, to force a look at tea, so to speak ....

            Such cheers-offers here have already been sucked 100/500 times. They will sort it out very thoroughly. And if he doesn’t sit down, do you want to bring him down in international airspace and declare war on the states? Moreover, such flights occur almost daily. And if our planes also begin to land-shoot down?
            1. 0
              7 November 2018 18: 01
              Quote: Piramidon
              Such cheers-offers here have already been sucked 100/500 times. They will sort it out very thoroughly. And if he doesn’t sit down, do you want to bring him down in international airspace and declare war on the states? Moreover, such flights occur almost daily. And if our planes also begin to land-shoot down?

              Yes, no, you do not need to shoot down, but you can forcibly ask to land. But I understood that no one intercepted him and did not even react to his presence near the border, but expressed another concern. And "Poseidon" flew close to the border, taking into account 3.7 km of search, the Americans looked a lot. They could at least create some kind of interference, and not just unsubscribe in a tweet, unless of course there was a threat. And if the P-8A flew without signals, in general it was necessary to blame, who knows what is flying there, there are large cities nearby, it is dangerous. Well, there is nothing to argue about, and indeed nothing could have happened, so the media duck is another ... hi
              1. +1
                7 November 2018 20: 01
                Quote: XXXIII
                Could at least create some kind of interference, and not so easy to write in a tweet

                Well, why do you think that you have laid out all the details here? And look where the legs grow from. On Twitter, data from PlaneRadar is posted, which is available to any more or less literate blogger, and here you rolled a whole cart on the Russian Defense Ministry.
                And if the P-8A flew without signals, it was generally necessary to bring down, who knows what flies there, nearby big cities, it is dangerous.

                And this is no way. fool At the level of the middle group of kindergarten. Like "I beat him because he was spinning near my sandbox and I don't like it at all." With what hangover are you going to "blame" everyone who you did not like in the international airspace? To get started, you will get acquainted with the rules of aircraft flights. You are either a simple troll who provokes scandals here or just the person about whom my squadron commander said - "Born to crawl, do not get confused on the runway." You are trying with the level of a construction battalion conscript, understanding the problem and discussing the topic of aviation. This is not yours. hi
                1. -2
                  7 November 2018 21: 36
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  You are either a simple troll who provokes scandals here or just the person about whom my squadron commander said - "Born to crawl, do not get confused on the runway." You are trying with the level of a construction battalion conscript, understanding the problem and discussing the topic of aviation. This is not yours.

                  Okay, there’s nothing to argue about, and indeed nothing could have happened, so the media duck is another .... hi
                  Yes, this campaign doesn’t have enough scandal for you, it’s stupid to cling to words and draw insulting conclusions in my direction, but you pecked and converted it to the level of insult ....
                  1. +1
                    7 November 2018 21: 40
                    Quote: XXXIII
                    Yes, this campaign doesn’t have enough scandal for you, it’s stupid to cling to words and draw insulting conclusions in my direction, but you pecked and converted it to the level of insult ....

                    Q.E.D. Lower level trolling. What did you see insults here? negative
                    In general, at first I thought you were a normal person, but I do not communicate with trolls. Farewell. hi All objections to the PM.
                    1. 0
                      7 November 2018 22: 12
                      Quote: Piramidon
                      In general, at first I thought you were a normal person, but I do not communicate with trolls. Farewell. All objections to the PM.

                      Yes, I will not mind you and I will not complain about you, what's the point, this happens in every topic .... laughing
                      And the news here from the category every day 3 world, just have time to comment .... wassat
  2. +9
    7 November 2018 11: 01
    Crew - 9 people, including 9 operators.

    I’m embarrassed to ask, but who is driving?
    1. IGU
      +3
      7 November 2018 11: 05
      Apparently the wagon pilot, multi-station.
    2. +4
      7 November 2018 11: 18
      Whoever loses in "Fool" leads winked
    3. +2
      7 November 2018 11: 31
      Quote: novel xnumx
      I’m embarrassed to ask, but who is driving?

      Autopilot!
      1. +1
        7 November 2018 11: 40
        and the navigator ????
  3. +5
    7 November 2018 11: 02
    Crew - 9 people, including 9 operators.

    belay And who is piloting ??? what
    1. +1
      7 November 2018 11: 33
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      And who is piloting ???

      Maybe their "carrier" is now called "airplane control operator"? request
      1. +5
        7 November 2018 11: 35
        Quote: Piramidon
        Maybe their "carrier" is now called "airplane control operator"?

        Well, if a loader can be called a "material assets transfer engineer", then this option is also possible. lol
  4. +1
    7 November 2018 11: 04
    So let it fly, the sky is not bought. I hope our scouts and patrols also visit the FSA neighborhood.
  5. +6
    7 November 2018 11: 05
    Recently, the activity of US and NATO aircraft conducting reconnaissance near Russian borders has increased markedly.
    In 1941, before the start of the war, the same was observed from the German side. The analogy is certainly not very good, but there is no getting away from reality. Intelligence intensity just does not increase.
    1. +2
      7 November 2018 11: 32
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Intelligence intensity just does not increase.

      And at times much less than the Union ..
    2. +1
      7 November 2018 11: 46
      Quote: rotmistr60
      the same was observed from the German side

      plus almost all of Europe is united under US rule, plus more and more troops are concentrated at our borders ...
  6. FID
    +2
    7 November 2018 11: 20
    [quote] Crew - 9 people, including 9 operators.

    I apologize, but how many pilots?
  7. 0
    7 November 2018 11: 41
    Poseidons with electronic warfare need to be ironed out, so, start drying with khibins to intercept or irradiate them every time they fly with something bad, such as fast neutrons, gamma radiation or, at worst, use a laser to dazzle unmanned pilots with air defense, is it not possible by chance? ?? where is Peresvet ?? and then completely insolent. Somehow under Khrushchev U-2 was extinguished and niche
    1. +2
      7 November 2018 12: 22
      Quote: Klingon
      irradiate them every time you fly with something bad, such as fast neutrons

      Right! Adopt an Andron collider urgently! laughing
      But nothing that the U-2 was shot down over Soviet territory, and not over neutral waters?
      1. +1
        7 November 2018 12: 27
        You can laugh but things like GAZers exist. I mean gamma lasers, emitters of coherent gamma radiation. And they don’t need a collider at all, they also work on single crystals. (I remembered Terra’s installation, though the laser there was not gamma, it was high, then I remember the flying Shuttle was felt just by the guidance system of this laser, not even the main setup, so the Shuttle’s crew got sick)) I meant shooting down only drones, well, as if by accident, during training firing ...
  8. 0
    7 November 2018 13: 13
    Be that as it may, but in Cuba there must be an air base to tickle the nerves of the Yankees.
  9. +1
    7 November 2018 14: 05
    ... the reconnaissance in the region was carried out by the strategic U.S. Air Force RQ-4A Global Hawk UAV ...

    When will we already have a similar UAV - a strategic reconnaissance aircraft? To lay his route every week, near the borders of the United States.
  10. 0
    8 November 2018 14: 16
    It's long time to "shoot down by mistake", and when the screeching starts THERE - "we are sorry" !! bully good These geeks will not do anything to us, otherwise we can still break into their bases across the planets — I don’t want to bomb, but we have everything in Belarus and Armenia.