Military Review

In China, there are tanks with two hatches, as in "Armata"

48
At the military exhibition, which opened on Tuesday in the Chinese Zhuhai, much attention was paid to the land forces technique. Among the samples of equipment noticed Tanks with two hatches in the case, like the Russian T-14, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta.




Both new cars and modernized samples are on display. For example, on one of the sites placed various versions of the tank Type 59, available in service in many countries of the world.

A total of about a dozen different-purpose vehicles are presented: from firefighters and engineering to models, the characteristics of which are as close as possible to the performance characteristics of the latest generation of tanks.

You can observe varying degrees of modernization. Everything is designed for the financial capabilities of a potential foreign customer. More advanced versions of the Type 59 received 125-mm gun with a twin 7,62-mm machine gun, dynamic protection, a new fire control system with a thermal imager, as well as a more powerful (800 hp) engine.



The mass of the tank increased to 40 tons, the crew still consists of 4 people.

Among the upgraded cars, observers noticed patterns that differed from the rest by having two hatches instead of one. This was reminded by the Armata T-14 to many. However, according to the newspaper, it is most likely training tanks, in which, along with the mechanic's place, there is a place for an instructor. This assumption is confirmed by the fact that one of the machines in the tower can be seen viewing windows, and the other on the tower there are no sights and viewing devices, the newspaper writes.

Previously, similar training options have already been seen in the Chinese army. This is a modified tanks Type 96.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/KomandanteS17
48 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. IGU
    IGU 6 November 2018 11: 19
    +2
    For the sake of space for the instructor do extra. Luke? Easier to solve the problem, isn't it fate?
    1. novel66
      novel66 6 November 2018 11: 26
      +12
      the Chinese have their own way, special
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 12: 19
        +14
        Quote: novel xnumx
        the Chinese have their own way, special

        hi And it is not always necessary in this way to look for the imitation of Russia. Thus, in the introduction of the shutter delay into the AK mechanism, the imitation of the AR-15 can be seen. An example is solely given as an example. yes
        1. novel66
          novel66 6 November 2018 12: 20
          +8
          an example as an example? Pasha. you are wonderful! hi
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 12: 30
            +13
            I specially applied tautology. In armaments, foreign know-how is often copied (or simply simply shoved insolently). It’s just that someone does it quietly, and someone flaunts it. And now I'm not talking about the Chinese. wink
            1. novel66
              novel66 6 November 2018 12: 31
              +8
              about Kalash in America? so they can!
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 12: 34
                +15
                Quote: novel xnumx
                about Kalash in America? so they can!

                Bingo! good And what: did God himself issue permission to them with his own signature and seal? Impunity breeds permissiveness. And permissiveness breeds lawlessness. What we see.
                1. Shurik70
                  Shurik70 6 November 2018 13: 01
                  +2
                  But one anti-personnel machine gun coaxial with a cannon for a tank by any means is not enough.
                  A separate heavy machine gun on the tower is also needed. A thing for the tank is necessary.
                  As for the "imitation" of Armata - nonsense. In two or three years, the tank cannot be brought to the point where it is possible to show foreigners to the exhibition. So this hatch appeared on prototypes long before Russia showed Armatu.
                  1. bouncyhunter
                    bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 13: 18
                    +8
                    Quote: Shurik70
                    So this prototype hatch appeared long before Russia showed Armata.

                    What I said above. hi
                    Quote: Shurik70
                    A separate heavy machine gun on the tower is also needed. A thing for the tank is necessary.

                    As an independent firing point, including anti-aircraft (without reference to the main weapons)? I don’t jerk, this moment is just really interesting.
                    1. Shurik70
                      Shurik70 6 November 2018 13: 27
                      +4
                      Yes. And shoot down the drone, and drive off the helicopter, and which suspicious house to riddle up, or to brush bushes for a couple of kilometers from the tank to comb, and a wedge heel, which shell is a pity to use, set fire to.
                      Anti-personnel, and even paired with a cannon, can’t cope with this. A heavy machine gun is needed.
                      1. bouncyhunter
                        bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 13: 33
                        +10
                        Actually, I understood that. Moreover, as I estimate, this machine gun should have not only the ability to control the operator, but also the ability to work from the OMS and network-centric target designation. Or am I too deep into the jungle of automation and robotics?
                      2. Shurik70
                        Shurik70 6 November 2018 13: 39
                        +3
                        Ideally, people should not kill people at all.
                        And if the war has begun, then let the robots die, not people.
                        So now all over the world they are trying to create drones, and even with the possibility of "swarm" for action in a group. For tanks, this trend also exists.
                        And what exactly is it on which tank is it - the latest developments are not shared with the media. General performance characteristics were said, and enough for the parade.
                      3. bouncyhunter
                        bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 13: 56
                        +9
                        Quote: Shurik70
                        Ideally, people should not kill people at all.

                        That's for sure . In the movie "Romeo Must Die" the right thought was sounded: "Weapons do not kill people. People kill."
                        Quote: Shurik70
                        And what exactly is it on which tank is it - the latest developments are not shared with the media. General performance characteristics were said, and enough for the parade.

                        It would be at least strange (if not stupid) to publicize your achievements to the fullest. Which, in turn, provides the basis for all kinds of speculation in the media.
            2. novel66
              novel66 6 November 2018 12: 36
              +4
              and so. since it’s gone, is it really necessary shutter lag?
              1. bouncyhunter
                bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 12: 40
                +13
                Quote: novel xnumx
                and so. since it’s gone, is it really necessary shutter lag?

                If it allows you to win even a split second when recharging - the answer is obvious, Roma. And if the mechanism of automatic removal from the slide delay is implemented when replacing an empty store with a full one ...
                1. novel66
                  novel66 6 November 2018 12: 47
                  +4
                  .... in inexperienced hands, a turn in your leg can happen (this is at best!)
                  1. bouncyhunter
                    bouncyhunter 6 November 2018 12: 58
                    +9
                    So give the inexperienced two balls of steel and you yourself know what will happen to them: one will rub - the second will break. But seriously: not everyone called up for urgency can be trusted with modern weapons without proper training and passing tests and standards.
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Bull Terrier
      Bull Terrier 6 November 2018 11: 33
      -1
      They need to sell park 59. They were there with him as soon as they were fit out) 125 guns to fit into it, which alone is worth it)
    3. Machito
      Machito 6 November 2018 11: 40
      0
      The second hatch to quickly dump out of this vehicle.
      1. bessmertniy
        bessmertniy 6 November 2018 12: 03
        0
        This is for ventilation, so that it ventilates faster in the tank with poor nutrition. wassat
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 6 November 2018 12: 06
        +4
        Quote: Bearded
        The second hatch to quickly dump out of this vehicle.

        You, besides "urya-urya", can you put something more intelligible? I ask a question about your "corpse vehicle"
        1. Bull Terrier
          Bull Terrier 6 November 2018 12: 18
          -8
          And where did you see Urya and who compared something to ours?) This is really an extremely weak machine for our time, but in banana countries it will fit like ours 62.
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 6 November 2018 12: 22
            +3
            Firstly, the question was not asked to you. Secondly, I asked about the "corpse wagon". And if you got stuck in a dialogue, can you answer this question yourself? hi
            1. Bull Terrier
              Bull Terrier 6 November 2018 12: 26
              -2
              So do not want otayetov, write questions in PM and not on the forum. What do you answer? That this 30 year machine does not meet modern requirements? Do you want to challenge this?)))
              1. Piramidon
                Piramidon 6 November 2018 12: 47
                0
                Specifically, do you have anything to answer about the "corpse vehicle" besides your conclusions?
                1. Bull Terrier
                  Bull Terrier 6 November 2018 12: 49
                  -2
                  Specifically, I already answered) this is an old machine that has not been produced 31 years already. Do you understand? For 31 years, not a single new one has left the factory. Copy 54. How else to call her? Wunderwaffe?)
      3. Vinnibuh
        Vinnibuh 6 November 2018 13: 08
        +1
        And the windows do not bother you? )))
  2. donavi49
    donavi49 6 November 2018 11: 37
    +6
    An interesting choice for news. Is this really the most interesting at the biggest event of the fall?

    For an example from really interesting novelties - WS-600L. New OTRK - universal class. Declares work on land-based stationary and moving targets, as well as marine targets.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 6 November 2018 11: 39
      +2
      New universal ballistic anti-ship missiles - at 15-290km with 6М.
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 6 November 2018 11: 41
        +2
        That same great and terrible CH-7. In a full-size layout (22 meters of scope, 13 tons of take-off).
      2. just exp
        just exp 6 November 2018 12: 53
        +2
        thanks for the news. I did not know what the Chinese 6M RCC did.
    2. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 6 November 2018 12: 40
      0
      Quote: donavi49
      An interesting choice for news. Is this really the most interesting at the biggest event of the fall?

      Such news is given in parts, and not dumped in one heap.
  3. g1washntwn
    g1washntwn 6 November 2018 11: 41
    +1
    The "Zaporozhets" also has 4 wheels, like a "Mercedes"! The version about cheap training tanks is preferred.
    Although, what's new there, if you run with a plastic dummy instead of AK, I can hardly imagine.
  4. Berkut24
    Berkut24 6 November 2018 11: 43
    +1
    Oh, 2 hatches are now a sign of a 4th generation tank. Technology. which can only be mastered by highly advanced countries.
  5. HMR333
    HMR333 6 November 2018 12: 19
    +1
    are they stupid people who have two hatches and what does he look like a fittings now? these foty also then have two hatches as armata I wanted to add another skyquoker did not become what kind of crazy news !!!

  6. Catfish
    Catfish 6 November 2018 12: 35
    +2
    Honestly, when I think about China and the extent of our common border, I somehow do not laugh. soldier
    1. yehat
      yehat 6 November 2018 12: 52
      +1
      there’s really nothing to laugh about. especially if you recall how many Chinese are constantly in Siberia. Some areas can already be called half or even more populated by the Chinese. There are such ones in the Far East, near Lake Baikal, in the vicinity of Krasnoyarsk and Chita.
  7. Zomanus
    Zomanus 6 November 2018 14: 04
    0
    Yes, garbage is everything, without military use.
    How many of our "unparalleled" weapons went into rework after combat experience in Syria.
    And here it’s the same, the blade is on fire. Without the experience of real battles, it's just crafts.
  8. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 6 November 2018 14: 20
    -1
    The main thing is that the mechanic's hatch should not be in the center of the tank. It’s easy to aim at it - because, the center of the target. And one or two hatches on the side is not so important.
    1. novel66
      novel66 6 November 2018 16: 57
      +1
      how so does the hatch weaken the structure?
      1. Okolotochny
        Okolotochny 6 November 2018 21: 56
        0
        Sapromat remembered something?
        1. novel66
          novel66 6 November 2018 23: 03
          0
          Lesh, sopromat, SOPRotivlenie MATERIALOV, and what else?
          1. Okolotochny
            Okolotochny 8 November 2018 00: 33
            -1
            Again, “heal”? I-beam, twisting, kink - this is so offhand.
  9. Allexxx
    Allexxx 6 November 2018 14: 58
    -2
    And where can I see cartoons of the Ministry of Defense of China on new types of weapons? Or they just have everything at the level of finished samples?
  10. faterdom
    faterdom 6 November 2018 15: 50
    0
    Two hatches is cool! This is not one of you hatched! This is two!
    1. LeonidL
      LeonidL 7 November 2018 08: 04
      0
      There are two of them?
  11. LeonidL
    LeonidL 7 November 2018 08: 03
    0
    The great copiers of everything and everything could not resist and now ...
  12. philosopher
    philosopher 8 November 2018 09: 09
    0
    The Chinese begin to copy from a candy wrapper, playing on the intuitive opinion of a potential buyer, which, since it looks like from the outside, means like that. Well, Lifan for some reason is not Toyota.