The nuclear baton of the US Navy (part 7)

28
In the second half of 70's, it became absolutely clear that neither side could win the global nuclear conflict. In this regard, the United States began to actively promote the concept of "limited nuclear war." American strategists considered possible the scenario of local use of nuclear weapons in a limited geographical area. First of all, it was about Western Europe, where the USSR and the ATS countries had a significant superiority over NATO forces in conventional weapons. In parallel with this, the strategic nuclear forces were improved.

As is known, at the beginning of the 70-ies, the naval component of the US strategic nuclear forces was almost equal in number of warheads on intercontinental ballistic missiles and long-range bombers by the number of deployed strategic carriers. The great advantage of submarine rocket carriers that are on combat patrols is their invulnerability to a sudden disarming nuclear missile strike. However, when comparing the American MinibR of the Minuteman family with the 9300-13000 km range and the Polaris A-3 and Poseidon SLBMs with the 4600-5600 km range, it’s clear that rocket boats must successfully approach the enemy coast . In this regard, the command of the US Navy has pushed through the development of the ULMS strategic armament system (Undersea Long-range Missile System - long-range submarine missile system). The basis of the system was to be a SSBN with new long-range missiles that could be launched immediately after leaving the base.



At the first stage, in order to minimize the costs associated with the retooling of existing strategic missile carriers, it was decided to create a new SLBM in UGM-73 Poseidon C-3 dimensions within the EXPO program (Eng. Expanded “Poseidon” - Advanced Poseidon). Quite predictably, a tender for the development of a promising rocket in 1974 was won by Lockheed Corporation, the creator and manufacturer of Polaris and Poseidon.

The nuclear baton of the US Navy (part 7)

The first launch of the Trident I rocket from the launcher of the Eastern Missile Range


Flight tests of the missile, designated UGM-96A Trident I (also used Trident I C-4), began on Cape Canaveral in January 1977 year. And the first launch from the USS Francis Scott Key (SSBN-657) of the Benjamin Franklin type took place in July of the 1979 year. In October of the same year, this SSBN was the first atomic submarine that went on combat patrol with UGM-96A Trident I.


USS Francis Scott Key SSBN (SSBN-657)


To increase the launch range, the Trident-1 rocket was made in three stages. In this case, the third stage is located in the central opening of the instrument compartment. For the manufacture of solid fuel engines used a well-developed technology of winding fibers with sizing it with epoxy resin. At the same time, unlike the Polaris A-3 and Poseidon missiles, where fiberglass and carbon fiber were used, the Keidlar thread was used on the Trident to reduce engine mass. The substance “nitrolan” mixed with polyurethane was used as a solid fuel. Pitch and yaw control on each engine was carried out by a swinging nozzle made of graphite-based material. Achievements in the field of microelectronics have reduced the mass of the electronic equipment in the guidance and control system, compared with the same unit of the Poseidon rocket by more than half. The use of lighter and more durable materials for the manufacture of engine housings, nozzles and thrust vector control elements, as well as the use of rocket fuel with a large specific impulse and the introduction of the third stage made it possible to increase the firing range of the Trident-1 rocket compared to Poseidon by approximately 2300 km - that is, at a distance equal to the firing range of the first American SLBM "Polaris A-1".

The three-stage UGM-96А Trident I 10,36 m and 1,8 m SLMs had a starting mass depending on the equipment variant: 32,3 - 33,145 t. As a combat load, it was originally intended to use eight warheads Mk.4 with individual guidance equipped with fusion warheads WNNX 76 ct each.


Section of the Mk.4 combat unit with the W76 thermonuclear warhead


The thermo-nuclear warhead W76 was developed by the Los Alamos National Laboratory and was in production from 1978 to 1987 year. At the Rokkiflet nuclear plant in Golden, Colorado, the company Rockwell International assembled 3400 warheads.

For targeting warheads on the target used the so-called "principle of the bus." Its essence is as follows: the head part of the rocket, after conducting astrocorrection of its location, targets the first target and fires the warhead, which flies to the target along a ballistic trajectory, then the location of the warhead breeding system is re-corrected, and the second is targeted Aim and shoot the next combat unit. A similar procedure is repeated for each warhead. If all warheads are aimed at one target, then a program is laid into the guidance system that allows you to strike with a separation in time. The maximum firing range is 7400 km. Through the use of astrocorrection, for which an optical telescope and a star sensor on a vidicon were on board the rocket, the CER was within 350 m. When the astrocorrection equipment failed, guidance was provided using an inertial system, in this case the CEP increased to 800 m.

The launch procedure for the UGM-96A Trident I was no different from the SLBMs already in service. Approximately in 15 minutes after receiving the corresponding order, the first rocket could start from the board of the submarine. After the pressure in the launch shaft aligns with the outboard and the solid shaft cover opens, the rocket in the launch pad is isolated from water only by a thin destructible dome-shaped asbestos-fiber-reinforced phenolic resin membrane. In the process of launching a rocket, the membrane is destroyed with the help of profiled explosive charges installed on its inner side, which allows the rocket to freely leave the mine. The release of the rocket occurs gas-vapor mixture produced by the powder pressure generator. The formed powder gases pass through the water chamber, cooled and diluted with condensed steam. After getting out of the water, the launch of the first-stage engine occurs at an altitude of 10-20 m. Elements of the launching cup are thrown overboard with the rocket.


Underwater launch of UGM-96А Trident I


As already mentioned in the previous parts of the review, the first American SSBNs of the “George Washington” type, created on the basis of the Skipjack torpedo submarines, experienced serious difficulties in maintaining the target depth during rocket launches. This deficiency was largely eliminated by boats of the Eten Allen type, but finally managed to get rid of the unstable horizontal position during rocket launches on the Lafayette-class SSBNs, modernized such as the Benjamin Franklin and James Madison. After the creation of special automata, which control the operation of gyroscopic stabilizing devices and the transfer of water ballast, the task of stable maintenance of a given depth was solved to keep the boat from failure to the depth or abrupt ascent.

As already mentioned, the new rocket was created mainly to enhance the strike capabilities of nuclear-powered rocket boats already in service. It must be said that the fundamental difference in the design of American SSBNs from the approach adopted in the USSR was standardization in the creation of the "SLBM - launching mine" complex. In the Soviet design offices for each new rocket designed its own boat. Initially, three sizes of rocket shaft diameters for SLBMs were installed in the USA:
"A" - with a diameter of 1,37 m.
"C" - with a diameter of 1,88 m.
"D" - with a diameter of 2,11 m.

At the same time, the mines on the SSBNs were originally designed and manufactured slightly higher in height than the SLBMs that are in service, so to speak, “for growth”. Initially, extended-range missiles were planned to re-equip the 31 SSBNs with the Poseidon 16 SLBM each. Also, 8 new generation Ohio-type boats with 24 missiles were to be commissioned. However, due to financial constraints, these plans have undergone significant adjustments. During overhauls of the UGM-96A Trident I submarine-launched submarine missiles, six “James Madison” and six “Benjamin Franklin” submarines were re-equipped.


USS Ohio SSBN (SSBN-726) during sea trials


The Trident-1 missiles, as it was planned, armed the first eight boats of the new generation of the Ohio type. At the time of creation, all the achievements of American submarine shipbuilding were concentrated in these strategic missile carriers. Based on the operating experience of the first and second generation SSBNs, Electric Boat engineers not only increased their secrecy and strike power, but also tried to provide maximum comfort for the crew. Special attention was also paid to increasing the service life of the reactor. According to data published by the developer of the S8G reactor, General Electric Corporation, its life without replacing the core is approximately 100 thousand hours of active work, which is equivalent to about 10 years of use of the reactor. On Lafayette type boats, this figure is about 2 times smaller. Increasing the reactor operation time without replacing nuclear fuel made it possible to extend the interval between repairs, which in turn had a positive effect on the number of boats in service, and reduced operating costs.

The introduction of the head boat USS Ohio (SSВN-726) in combat fleet Held in November 1981 On boats of this type there is a record number of missile silos - 24. However, the underwater displacement of the Ohio SSBNs inspires respect - 18 tons. The length of the submarine is 750 m, the hull width is 170,7 m. Thus, with a significant increase geometrical dimensions, the underwater displacement of the SSBN "Ohio" in comparison with SSBN type "Lafayette" increased by almost 12,8 times. The use of special steel grades: HY-2,3/80 - with a yield strength of 100–60 kgf / mm made it possible to bring the maximum immersion depth to 84 m. Working depth - to 500 m. Maximum underwater speed - up to 360 knots.

Thanks to the use of a number of original design solutions, boats of the Ohio type, compared to Lafayette type SSBNs, have reduced noise from 134 to 102 dB. Among the technical innovations that made it possible to achieve this were: single shaft propulsion, flexible couplings, various connecting devices and shock absorbers for insulating the propeller shaft and pipelines, a lot of noise absorbing inserts and sound insulation inside the case, using a low noise minimum stroke with the exception of circulation pumps and low speed low noise screws of a special form.

With the impressive performance of the boat, the cost was also impressive. Without the missile complex, the headboat cost the US military budget $ 1,5 billion. However, the admirals were able to convince lawmakers of the need to build two batches of the total number of 18 submarines. The construction of the boats continued from 1976 to 1997 year.



For the sake of justice, I must say that underwater atomic bomber of the Ohio type are really very good. Due to the high technical excellence, a large margin of safety and a significant modernization potential, all built boats are still in service. Initially, all the Ohio-type SSBNs were deployed at the Bangor (Washington) naval base on the Pacific Coast. They became part of the 17 Squadron and replaced decommissioned missile boats of the type “George Washington” and “Eten Allen” with the “Polaris A-3” missiles. The James Madison and Benjamin Franklin SSBNs were based mainly on the Atlantic base of Kings Bay (Georgia), and operated until the middle of the 90's. It must be said that the use of boats armed with Trident-1 missiles was high. On average, each boat went on three combat patrols per year, lasting up to 60 days. The latest UGM-96A Trident I missiles were decommissioned in the 2007 year. The dismantled W76 warheads are used to equip Trident II D-5 missiles or transferred to storage.


Loading UGM-96A Trident I SLBMs from the supply ship


For medium repair, replenishment and ammunition could be used naval base on the island of Guam. Here, in addition to the repair infrastructure, there were permanent supply ships, in whose holds were also stored ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads. The implication was that in the event of an exacerbation of the international situation and an increase in the threat of a global conflict, the supply ships accompanied by the escort would leave the base in Guam. After the ammunition was used up, American SSBNs were to meet at sea or in ports of friendly states with floating arsenals and replenish supplies. In this case, the boats at sea, retained their combat effectiveness, even with the destruction of the main American naval bases.

The purchase of the last installment of the Trident - 1 took place in 1984. In total, Lockheed Corporation supplied 570 missiles. The maximum number of deployed UGM-96A Trident I SLBMs on 20 boats was 384 units. Initially, each missile could carry eight 100-kiloton warheads. However, in accordance with the provisions of the START-1 agreement, the number of warheads on each rocket was limited to six units. Thus, on American SSBNs, Trident-1 SLBM carriers could be deployed over 2300 units with individual guidance. However, on the boats that are on combat patrol and capable of launching their missiles in 15 minutes after receiving the corresponding order, there were not many more 1000 warheads.

The creation and deployment of the UGM-96A Trident I well demonstrates the US Navy’s strategy for building the naval component of the strategic nuclear forces. As a result of an integrated approach and cardinal modernization of existing boats and the construction of new ones, and by increasing the firing range, it was possible to drastically reduce the effectiveness of the Soviet anti-submarine forces. Reducing the QUO warheads made it possible to achieve a fairly high probability of hitting fortified point targets. According to information published in the American media, military experts in the field of nuclear planning with the "cross" pointing of several warheads of various Trident - 1 missiles at one target such as silo-propelled missile systems, evaluated the possibility of achieving its destruction with probability 0,9. And such an alignment, with the preliminary decommissioning of the Soviet Early Missile Warning System (EWS) and the deployment of space and ground-based components of the anti-missile defense, already made it possible to hope for victory in a nuclear war and minimize damage from a retaliatory strike. In addition, intercontinental-range submarine-launched ballistic missiles had important advantages over the ICBM deployed in US territory. The launch of the Trident - 1 SLBM could be carried out from sections of the World Ocean and along trajectories that made it difficult for Soviet radars to detect early warning systems. When conducting patrols in areas that were traditional for American SSBNs with the Polaris and Poseidon missiles, the flight time of the Trident-1 SLBMs to targets located deep inside Soviet territory was 10-15 minutes, against 30 minutes for MBR "Minuteman."

However, even for the most ardent American “hawks” by the middle of the 80's, it was obvious that with the presence of more than 10 000 deployed nuclear charges in the USSR on strategic carriers, the hopes for victory in global conflict are not realistic. Even with the most successful US development and liquidation, 90% of Soviet silos, ICBMs, SSBNs, long-range bombers, all strategic forces control centers and top military-political leadership of the surviving Soviet strategic nuclear forces were more than enough to inflict unacceptable damage to the enemy.

Thus, according to the calculations of American military analysts, a salvo of one Soviet strategic missile submarine, 667BDR Kalmar Avenue with 16 intercontinental liquid ballistic missiles Р-29Р, could hit up to 112 targets, killing more than 6 million Americans. Also in the Soviet Union, they successfully developed and put on combat duty ground and railway strategic missile systems, which, thanks to their mobility, were able to avoid destruction.

To prevent a sudden decapitating and disarming attack, in the USSR at the beginning of 80-s, along with the construction of radar radar systems and the deployment of a network of artificial earth satellites intended for timely fixation of missile launches, the Perimeter system was developed and tested (known in the West as English). Dead Hand - “Dead Hand”) is a complex of automatic control of a massive retaliatory nuclear strike. The basis of the complex was a computer system that automatically analyzes such factors as: the presence of communication with command centers, the fixation of powerful seismic shocks, accompanied by electromagnetic pulses and ionizing radiation. Based on these data, the launch of command missiles based on the UR-100U ICBM was to be carried out. Instead of a regular warhead, a radio-technical system was installed on the missiles, which transmitted combat signals to the Strategic Missile Forces command posts on SSBN and strategic bombers with cruise missiles. Apparently, in the middle of 80-x in the USSR, a deliberate leak to the West of information concerning the Perimeter system was organized. An indirect confirmation of this is how badly the Americans reacted to the existence of the Doomsday system in the USSR and how persistently they sought to eliminate it during the negotiations on the reduction of strategic offensive arms.

Another Soviet response to an increase in the strike power of the American component of the SNF was the strengthening of the anti-submarine forces of the USSR Navy. In December, the first BOD of the 1980 Ave, which had anti-submarine capabilities in comparison with the ships of the 1155A and 1134B, was significantly expanded. Also in the 1134-s, the Soviet submarine had unique fighter boats pr.80 with a titanium hull and a reactor on a liquid metal coolant. The high speed and maneuverability characteristics of these submarines allowed them to quickly occupy an advantageous position to attack and successfully evade anti-submarine torpedoes. As part of the concept of enhancing the capabilities of the country's antisubmarine defense, special attention was paid to enhancing the search capabilities of multi-purpose third-generation submarines, the 705 and 945 ave. The boats of these projects were to replace the atomic multi-purpose submarines Ave 971. Submarines Ave 671 and 945 in their capabilities were close. But in view of the fact that the hull of the 971 (945A) Ave. was built of titanium, they had a greater depth of immersion and a minimum level of such unmasking signs as noise and magnetic fields. As a result, these submarines were the most inconspicuous in the Soviet Navy. At the same time, the high cost of titanium boats prevented their mass construction. The submarines of the 945 Ave were much more numerous, which, in terms of their visibility characteristics, became virtually equal to the American 971 generation boats.

Since Be-12 and Il-38 aircraft could not control remote areas of the World Ocean, in the mid-70s, pilots of the Soviet sea aviation mastered the long-range anti-submarine Tu-142. This machine was created on the basis of the long-range marine reconnaissance Tu-95RC. However, due to the imperfection and unreliability of anti-submarine equipment, the first Tu-142 was used mainly as long-range reconnaissance, patrol and search and rescue aircraft. The anti-submarine potential was brought to an acceptable level on the Tu-142M, adopted for service in 1980.

From the foregoing, it follows that the development and adoption of the Trident-1 SLBM, despite the significant qualitative strengthening of the American strategic nuclear forces, did not make it possible to achieve superiority over the USSR. But at the same time, the new round of the “arms race” imposed by the United States had an extremely negative impact on the state of the Soviet economy, overburdened by military spending, which in turn led to an increase in negative socio-political processes.

To be continued ...

Based on:
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-96.html
http://plrc.org/docs/011117D.pdf
https://fas.org/blogs/security/2018/10/new-start-sep/
http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1421
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 November 2018 06: 10
    Finally, I waited for the continuation, otherwise there is nothing to read, and I am glad that there is a continuation. Thank you very much.
  2. +1
    10 November 2018 07: 47
    -Anti-submarine potential was brought to an acceptable level on the Tu-142M, adopted for service in 1980. -

    There is a need to build and build. At least a couple of regiments. Especially on KTOF.
    1. +6
      10 November 2018 09: 30
      Quote: gunnerminer
      There is a need to build and build. At least a couple of regiments. Especially on KTOF.

      The newest Tu-142М3 is delivered to the customer in 1994 year. The airframe resource of these machines is still great, but the anti-submarine equipment is largely outdated. In the flying state at the Kamenny Stream airfield under the Sovgavan in the flying state, God forbid, there are about ten cars left.
  3. +6
    10 November 2018 08: 25
    Sergey, thank you. So interesting and exciting that I had to go to a neighboring site. It is right to say that you cannot grasp the immensity, you have already done a lot of work. And the rocket itself has a bunch of breakthrough solutions: Kevlar in the elements of the engine body, new solid fuel, but you can't list everything, but the most interesting thing is: SLBM guidance system " Trident-1 "manages the missile's flight both at the stage of operation of its main engines, and at the stage of disengagement of warheads. The main elements of the guidance system are a gyro-stabilized platform on which gyro instruments and an astro sensor are located, as well as an onboard computer that generates control signals. To ensure the normal operation of the guidance system, it uses a thermostating subsystem, which includes temperature sensors and heaters of inertial devices, as well as water cooling.
    The use of new advances in microelectronics on the Trident-1 SLBM made it possible to reduce the mass of the electronic equipment unit in the guidance and control system by 50% compared to the similar unit on the Poseidon-SZ missile. In particular, the indicator of integration of electronic equipment on the Polaris-AZ missiles was 0,25 conventional elements per cm1, on the Poseidon-SZ - 3, on the Trident-1 - 1 (thanks to the use of thin-film hybrid schemes). Sergei, these additions I sluggish from the Rocket Technique website. Thanks again.
    http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/trident1/trident1.shtml
  4. +3
    10 November 2018 09: 08
    In about 15 minutes after receiving the appropriate order, the first rocket could launch from the side of a boat in submerged position.

    Why so long? The flight task is already loaded, it is not necessary to spin the gyroscopes ... request
    1. +4
      10 November 2018 09: 34
      Hi!
      Quote: professor
      Why so long? The flight task is already loaded, it is not necessary to spin the gyroscopes ...

      As far as I know, on the missiles on board the SSBN gyroscopes are spinning constantly. But it's not that... No. The procedure for making decisions on the combat use of SLBMs is rather complicated, besides, it is necessary to precisely determine your coordinates, test the missiles, ascend to the required depth, open the covers of the mines and equalize the pressure in them with the outboard ones.
      1. +4
        10 November 2018 09: 42
        Quote: Bongo
        The procedure for making decisions on the combat use of SLBMs is rather complicated, besides, it is necessary to precisely determine your coordinates, test the missiles, ascend to the required depth, open the covers of the mines and equalize the pressure in them with the outboard ones.

        Or maybe "15 minutes" is American misinformation? As a former officer of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet, I do not see a set of measures that takes 15 minutes. ok before it was necessary to spin the gyros, but now ... request
        1. +5
          10 November 2018 09: 50
          Quote: professor
          Quote: Bongo
          The procedure for making decisions on the combat use of SLBMs is rather complicated, besides, it is necessary to precisely determine your coordinates, test the missiles, ascend to the required depth, open the covers of the mines and equalize the pressure in them with the outboard ones.

          Or maybe "15 minutes" is American misinformation? As a former officer of the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet, I do not see a set of measures that takes 15 minutes. ok before it was necessary to spin the gyros, but now ... request

          Complex issue... request But as part of the BSF, SSBN was not, and launching a rocket from a submarine is still much more complicated than from an underground mine. And by and large, what does it change - 5 or 15 minutes? After all, more than 90% of American SSBNs are absolutely not vulnerable in Russian means of PLO.
          1. +4
            10 November 2018 09: 59
            Quote: Bongo
            But the BSF RPSNS was not a member, and launching a rocket from a submarine is still a much more complicated procedure than from an underground mine.

            What is the launch time of the rocket from the mine after receiving the order?

            Quote: Bongo
            But by and large, what does it change - 5 or 15 minutes?

            If we take into account the flight time, then yes, but the carrier is vulnerable and it needs to shoot back quickly, and it seemed like it was a disarming strike, but here it is important to strike quickly, covertly and simultaneously.

            Quote: Bongo
            Indeed, more than 90% of American SSBNs are absolutely not vulnerable to Russian anti-aircraft defense systems.

            It's true.

            For the article, of course, 5 points to you, but with a tiny minus. For that:
            But at the same time, a new round of "arms race", imposed by the United States, ...

            1. The policy in the article about materiel is a "minus".
            2. About who imposed the arms race on anyone. How will argue about the current arms race claiming that it was not Russia started.

            But this is an offtopic. Not for discussion. hi
            1. +3
              10 November 2018 10: 10
              What is the launch time of the rocket from the mine after receiving the order?

              For land ICBM R-36M2 Voivoda-62 seconds.
            2. +3
              10 November 2018 11: 25
              Quote: professor
              What is the launch time of the rocket from the mine after receiving the order?

              The publication of this said (according to American data).
              Quote: professor
              If we take into account the flight time, then yes, but the carrier is vulnerable and it needs to shoot back quickly, and it seemed like it was a disarming strike, but here it is important to strike quickly, covertly and simultaneously.

              Yes, no difference in the long run. What part of the American SSBNs could really have been sinking the Soviet hunting boats and PLO forces?
              Quote: professor
              1. The policy in the article about materiel is a "minus".
              2. About who imposed the arms race on anyone. How will argue about the current arms race claiming that it was not Russia started.

              Unfortunately, military planning in general and nuclear planning in particular are inseparably linked with politics. The arms race was categorically not in the interests of the USSR, just as it is not in the interests of Russia now.
              1. 0
                10 November 2018 13: 04
                Quote: professor
                For the article, of course, 5 points to you, but with a tiny minus. For that:

                Forced to join. It is very unpleasant to see how one of the few remaining adequate authors sinks to politoty (who imposed something there) and unfounded statements (as far as one can judge, the author did not understand the details of the Soviet PLO).
                And the problem is not whether it is true or not, but that it is not your topic. Nothing of the kind follows from the text of the work. Worthy analytics in this part turns into chatter in the kitchen.
                1. jjj
                  +2
                  10 November 2018 14: 17
                  In the USSR, it was customary to take weapons in response. Enormous amounts of money were spent on defense. R&D was carried out on various topics. But weapon systems began to be produced precisely in response. So it was cheaper. USSR also knew how to count money
                  1. +2
                    10 November 2018 19: 46
                    Quote: jjj

                    In the USSR, it was customary to take weapons in response.

                    Somehow this is not associated with constant statements about "the first in the world" and "they have lagged behind us for xx years."
                    1. 0
                      10 November 2018 20: 44
                      These statements apply to the Russian Federation (Poseidon, Petrel, Vanguard) - the answer is for the United States.
      2. +3
        10 November 2018 10: 28
        Good morning, Sergey, I have a question for you. When the SSBN returns to the base, part of the SLBM ammunition is changed to other missiles from the storage arsenal, and the removed missiles are checked and sent for storage, but I read that the Yankees put these missiles on combat duty after verification , in mine arsenal launchers, at least for Trident-1 and 2, that is, when the arsenal is of type land launchers and they are stored in combat mode, in which case you can launch them, especially if the SSBN is under repair, is it true or no, enlighten if not difficult.
        1. +4
          10 November 2018 11: 26
          Quote: merkava-2bet
          Good morning Sergey

          Good evening, Andrew!
          Quote: merkava-2bet
          When the SSBN is returned to the base, part of the SLBM ammunition is changed to other missiles from the storage arsenal, and the removed missiles are checked and sent to storage, but I read that after checking these missiles the Yankees put on combat duty, in the mine PU

          This is not true... No.
          Quote: merkava-2bet
          This is especially true if the SSBN is under repair, is it true or not, enlighten if not difficult

          This will be in the final part. hi
          1. jjj
            -1
            10 November 2018 14: 25
            The Ohio-class boats, huge in displacement, could be based only in two deep-water naval bases. In the USSR, they took a different path. Etc. 941 was made so displacement that when pumping out the ballast, our boats could enter almost all naval bases. But then all the same it was necessary to build BDRMs. And the 955 project turned out to be quite compact. I wonder where the design idea will lead the Americans?
            1. +5
              10 November 2018 14: 41
              Quote: jjj
              The Ohio-class boats, huge in displacement, could be based only in two deep-water naval bases.

              Do not repeat something nonsense. Ohio has a far from record rainfall and can go to any port where large vehicles like the T-AKR like Gordon can go. But the infrastructure for them - weapons storage, training facilities, hangars, workshops - is only at two bases, Bangor and Kings Bay. This is quite enough. The entire Russian fleet will not have the infrastructure and one such base.
    2. +3
      10 November 2018 21: 09
      Quote: professor
      Why so long? The flight task is already loaded, it is not necessary to spin the gyroscopes ...

      Colleague, gyroscopes are spun before shooting, except for laser ones, of course. A machine cannot gobble up its resource all the time. In addition, the on-board computer is being tested, and if my sclerosis does not change me, -6! Time is spent on opening the blister with codes, receiving confirmation of the received signal reliability, occupying the starting corridor, receiving navigation data of firing, readiness of systems for launch ... only then - "the key to the socket!" But after that everything goes further along the cyclogram.
      And here is how the operation algorithm is described after receiving a start order:
      With the receipt of an order for launching missiles, the boat commander announces a combat alert. After verifying the authenticity of the order, the commander gives the command to bring the submarine into ISy technical readiness, which is the highest degree of readiness. This command specifies the coordinates of the ship, the speed decreases to the values ​​that ensure the launch of missiles, the boat floats up to a depth of about 30 m. When the navigation post, as well as the subsystem for monitoring and ejecting missiles from the mines, are ready, the SSBN commander inserts a key into the corresponding hole in the fire control panel and switches it. By this action, he gives the command to the rocket compartment of the boat for the direct prelaunch preparation of the rocket complex. Before launching the rocket, the pressure in the launching shaft is aligned with the outboard, then the solid shaft cover opens. After that, access to seawater is blocked only by a relatively thin membrane located under it. The rocket is launched directly by the commander of the weapon’s warhead (missile-torpedo) using a red trigger (black for training launches), which is connected to the computer using a special cable. Then the powder pressure accumulator is turned on. The gases generated by it pass through a chamber with water and are partially cooled. The resulting low-temperature steam enters the lower part of the launch cup and pushes the rocket out of the shaft.

      Again, if sclerosis does not fail, then the Yankees still shoot in series at 4 units, under the launch conditions: V plarb = to 5,0uz; H burr = up to 30,0m; T^start = 15-20 seconds, sea ​​swell - up to 6 points.
      Our performance is better! Yes bully
      1. +2
        10 November 2018 23: 07
        Colleague, gyroscopes untwist before shooting, with the exception of laser of course. A machine cannot devour its resource all the time.
        Why can’t they, the good old Minitman-2,3 ICBMs are on combat duty with gyroscopes fully turned on for years, since they have gyroscopes with an electrostatic suspension in a vacuum chamber, and nothing, by the way, this was one of the main problems of the first domestic ICBMs and SLBM, long preparation for launch, but then this problem was solved.
        1. +3
          11 November 2018 00: 47
          Quote: merkava-2bet
          the good old Minuteman-2,3 ICBMs are on combat duty with gyros fully turned on for years

          1. Minitman-2 have not stood for a long time ...
          2. The land complex is still not marine. The ground one does not hesitate and after a month it is changed by another ... And the sea maneuvers, if not strange. The Trident-2 D5 actually has two control units in the instrument compartment (among other things)
          In the first block (size 0,42X0,43X0,23 m, weight 30 kg) there are computers that form control signals and control circuits. In the second block (diameter 0,355 m, weight 38,5 kg) there is a gyro-stabilized platform on which two gyroscopes, three accelerometers, an astro-sensor, and also thermostatic equipment are installed ...

          3. As tension grows, SSBNs are moving to shorter communication programs. When switching to 1, the clock, as a rule, accelerates gyroscopes ... At least, this is logical ...
          Yes, optical gyroscopes can work for a very long time ... but why, if nothing portends an aggravation of the situation? Another thing, if there is an escalation of the crisis, then ours with open covers went ...
          So, not everyone here is Feng Shui! But...
      2. +1
        11 November 2018 10: 45
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        Colleague, gyroscopes untwist before shooting, with the exception of laser of course.

        So on Triiden there is nothing to untwist:
        http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1019554.pdf
        Interferometric Fiber-Optic Gyro, can accelerometers ...
        Alternate Pendulous Integrating Gyro Accelerometer

        I haven’t found the numbers in 15 minutes from receiving an order to launching a rocket.
        Sergey, but found this:
        CEP: Requirement: 90 – 120 meters (300 – 390 ft). That demonstrated by flight tests is significantly better.
        QUO: Requirement: 90-120 meters (300-390 feet). Flight tests showed significantly better performance.
        http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JCM/Vol%204_1_15.pdf
        hi
    3. +1
      11 November 2018 20: 03
      Quote: professor
      Why so long? The flight task is already loaded, it is not necessary to spin the gyroscopes ...

      in addition to surfacing to the start-up depth, opening the shafts, equalizing the overboard pressure and temperature, it is necessary, before using the command from the control system, to use the energetic launch tool (ejection device):

      - determine on the site of the rocket movement after exiting the mine using *******, an element of the control system the current value of the parameters of the medium, for the introduction of adjustments in the PP passed by the rocket distance, and speed to overcome it.
      - compare the estimated vertical speed with the minimum allowable, which was chosen (when, then) during the design of the rocket,
      - calculate the distance that the rocket will travel from the submarine to the exit point for the two-phase medium section, and compare it with the allowable distance selected from the energy capabilities of the used ejection device (selected during the development of the rocket),
      - using measuring instruments of the angular position of the rocket (sensors of angles and angular velocities) determine the current parameters of the angular motion of the rocket,
      - compare the measured parameters of the angular motion with the acceptable conditions for stabilization of the rocket after engaging the main engine (selected in the design process of the rocket),
      Since, at the moment of fulfillment of any of the three conditions, either reaching the vertical speed of its minimum acceptable value, or achieving the parameters of the angular motion of the corresponding maximum permissible values, or reaching the set distance traveled by the rocket, they generate a command to turn on the rocket propulsion engine
      .... further, the rocket carries out controlled movement with the marching engine running according to a given program, taking into account the introduced correction factors
      Otherwise, the CVO will be +/- 100500
  5. +7
    10 November 2018 11: 21
    hi Good afternoon. Thank.
    The launch procedure of the UGM-96A Trident I was no different from the SLBMs already in service.


    ... I will add: unsuccessful test launches of some SLBMs: recourse
  6. +4
    10 November 2018 15: 08
    Sergei hi excellent article cycle good . the only thing, it seems to me that the project 705 boats were still more of a burden for the navy than a tactical advantage. Moreover, both the nuclear power and liquid metal coolant and the hull played a cruel joke with them, and you could write an entire article about the high noise level .Main of its merits, speed up to 40 knots, and maneuverability, which supposedly allowed it to escape from the attack of a torpedo standing at that time in the arsenal of the US Navy, was leveled out by its detection range and, accordingly, to prevent it from dueling. The performance and degree of innovation is very doubtful. How the testing ground for working out a number of design decisions, the boats of this project were more than suitable as a combat unit, is doubtful. But in any case, their effectiveness can only be determined in battle, and we can only build assumptions based on on the characteristics. in any case, write more and preferably more and more often feel it’s a pity that the coverage of events in Ukraine and America attracts more people than truly worthwhile and informative articles.
  7. +5
    10 November 2018 22: 59
    How nice to read a good article on Saturday! hi
    And the comments on her are interesting! hi
    Special thanks for mentioning that "I must say that the fundamental difference in the design of American SSBNs from the approach adopted in the USSR was the standardization in the creation of the SLBM-launch silo complex. In the Soviet design bureaus, its own boat was designed for each new missile. " It seems to me that in some ways these principles were similar for surface ships (UVP Mk41 is an example of this). And thanks for the "Perimeter".
    It seems to me that our "anti-submarine story" is sad and has become even sadder, there is no need for salt on the wounds ... crying
    It would be nice to read about the "Nuclear Club of Russia" ... feel
    Dream, dream ... feel
  8. 0
    28 December 2018 13: 41
    Quote: professor
    Why so long? The flight task is already loaded, it is not necessary to spin the gyroscopes ...



    The flight task is entered during the launch command. Gyroscopes spin constantly. It is necessary to get access for 3 people to permit the launch. Then the opening of the shaft cover, filling with water, the command to use the batteries, turn off the side and start ..

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"