The Ukrainian C-300B1 ADMS was used for the first time in 19 years.

62
Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Victor Muzhenko reported on his page in Facebookthat he spent several days at the test site in the Kherson region, where short and medium range anti-aircraft systems were tested.





According to Muzhenko, the shooting was successful and confirmed the capabilities of the Ukrainian army "to significantly increase the combat potential in the shortest possible time."

He reported that the combat use of the C-300B1 mobile anti-aircraft missile system occurred for the first time in 19 years. In this case, the calculation was able to destroy two air targets.

Muzhenko added that successful missile launches from reconstructed medium-range and short-range complexes, as well as testing of a modernized fire control system, “actually opened up prospects for further loading of the Ukrainian defense industry.

Earlier, the Ukrainian media, citing the secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Turchinov, reported on the firing at the Yagorlyk range (Kherson region) using reconstructed and modified C-300 systems of various modifications, Tor, Buk and Osa-AKM . The aim of the training was to work out the tasks as part of a multi-level air defense system.

According to Turchinov, the construction of an air defense system is one of the pressing problems of the security and defense sector of Ukraine.

Battle shooting began on November 1. They must end on Sunday, November 4.
  • Ministry of Defense of Ukraine
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    4 November 2018 08: 35
    Battle shooting began on November 1. They must end on Sunday, November 4.


    When the rockets run out ........
    1. 0
      4 November 2018 08: 45
      Here it would be ours, although what is it ours, if in truth, the leadership to act by the Israeli method and precisely destroy systems such as threatening at the hands of the inadequate junta, ruling on our Russian land, called Ukraine today. All foreign policy actions of the country should be aimed, first of all, at returning these primordially Russian lands to the power of the Russian people. All other steps that do not bring this goal closer should be perceived as the actions of enemies, which should be punished in all severity of a fair people's court.
      1. +22
        4 November 2018 09: 07
        And you show an example to the government. Right on your couch, having made an anti-aircraft maneuver, pointwise, but on launchers! And then a military U-turn and at headquarters! And if there is enough fuel and sore imagination, then immediately to Kiev! ...
        1. Don
          +4
          4 November 2018 10: 11
          Stupid jokes, presented as witty, always find approval in people with poorly developed intelligence. Go on, each has its own audience.
      2. +7
        4 November 2018 09: 49
        Quote: kjhg
        act by the Israeli method and precisely destroy systems such as those threatening at the hands of the inadequate junta, ruling on our Russian land, called Ukraine today.

        Sorry to interfere in the dialogue, but special circumstances forced me to do this, for which I'm sorry. So, no forceful strike on the Kievites is possible. It was possible in the 14th year of the Yanuca to suppress the fascist gang, and the troops of the Southern District and the Guards Kantemirovtsy, Tamanets go to the Bug, / roughly say / creating a strong barrier and paralyzing NATO. We chose the option "whatever happens," so we have that Ukraine is waging a war, the coffins are moving steadily, so who killed them? In general, hatred of Russia is growing, and The level of interaction between NATO and the Ukrainian Armed Forces is constantly increasing. Yes, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine are not so simple, because it is a belligerent organization, and the fired units are rated higher than the peaceful reserve battalions.
        1. +4
          4 November 2018 10: 22
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Sorry to get into a dialogue, but special circumstances forced me to do so, forgive me.

          Do not apologize, because this platform is just designed to discuss current news.
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          So, no power strike on the people of Kiev is possible

          Why do you immediately deprive us of such a right of self-defense as a preemptive target strike? Some countries strike at their neighbors, and not only for less significant reasons, or even for absolutely invented ones. And this, I must admit, is a rather effective leverage. I do not propose a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. I am simply a supporter of more active support for pro-Russian forces and more effective influence on anti-Russian elements. This would enable the numerous pro-Russian forces of Ukraine to influence the ruling regime more.
          1. +3
            4 November 2018 10: 37
            Quote: kjhg
            Why do you immediately deprive us of such a right of self-defense as a preemptive target strike?

            Because the Armed Forces of Ukraine are eighteen, they are not weak APUs of the fourteenth year and military operation is quick and fleeting is impossible, because if any APU brigade retreats to a large city, it will deploy a layered defense without caring for pick-ups and ticks, the teeth of our ticks can cut off the defenders, but the Ukrainians will defend themselves with special stubbornness. brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. A stubborn and tenacious enemy, not afraid to go on the counterattack. These are not genatsvali, hi Russian battle school soldier
            1. +2
              4 November 2018 10: 45
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              These are not genatsvali, hi Russian battle school

              I do not argue with this, we are one people, we had one school. I repeat again, if you did not notice, I did not offer an invasion of Ukraine. I propose the application of systematic targeted strikes, using our superiority in this, against the most important objects of the enemy’s military infrastructure: military depots, factories, bases, etc. No invasion or occupation is required to destroy the critical infrastructure of the enemy.
              1. -4
                4 November 2018 11: 25
                You propose to bomb Ukraine in the Stone Age, and this is called to destroy the country! You have some kind of American methods I will report to you!
                1. +2
                  4 November 2018 15: 10
                  The time to turn the second cheek is over. This does not give the offender the opportunity to change his mind, but simply gives you the opportunity to get one more time at the cabbage soup. We really lack what we are accused of: aggression.
          2. -1
            4 November 2018 11: 23
            Because it seems that they are not at war with Ukraine, and they are not pulling troops to our border! You mean Israel, since it is at war with Syria, Iran is also roaming around Syria at home, and Jews are scorching in Syria , we do not have such a ride with Ukraine, not a lot of trump cards!
          3. 0
            5 November 2018 00: 57
            Quote: kjhg
            Some countries strike at their neighbors, and not only for less significant reasons, or even for absolutely invented ones.

            Here it is! I knew that Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya are the closest neighbors of the United States .... good
      3. -2
        4 November 2018 10: 17
        Yes, with what joy? This is a different state. Alien. Why do you need these lands? Are you few of your own? People? The country is large, there is enough space for everyone.
        1. +5
          4 November 2018 10: 30
          Quote: Bull Terrier
          Yes, with what joy? This is a different state. Alien. Why do you need these lands?

          The point is not entirely in the lands and not even in people, although this is also available. These territories, called Ukraine today, are of strategic interest for the security of our state. And that is precisely why we cannot and, in no case, must agree to the occupation of Ukraine by anti-Russian forces. Ukraine will be either pro-Russian or anti-Russian. The second option for us is a geopolitical nightmare, even worse than the anti-Russian Belarus, and for the enemies of Russia - a trump card, which is very difficult to cover with something.
        2. 0
          4 November 2018 11: 00
          The principle is not to seize additional land, but to create a buffer belt around the Russian Federation. During the Soviet era, this function was performed by the SSR, forming a protective belt on our borders. This made it possible to meet the Wehrmacht on distant approaches, to stretch its logistics and facilitate the general mobilization of the Soviet. Far Eastern and Siberian riflemen arrived on time and became an unpleasant surprise for Gepner and Guderian. The Soviet "eastern" divisions arrived on time. Moscow, Shish them, not the capital! The artillery offensive, the rush of the Air Force and the NKVD special troops on machines with mines, the tension of the entire Soviet people ---- gave a result, the Wehrmacht shock tank groups could not penetrate the Soviet defense, the Soviet defense held out and an ominous fog spread over the positions of the German-Soviet defense ...
          1. 0
            4 November 2018 11: 07
            And the uncertainty of the volley of Soviet rocket artillery was cut, in a split second, the fire of shells formed a massive breach in the construction of the German tank regiment, everything burned and melted.
      4. -1
        4 November 2018 11: 20
        Are you crazy?
      5. 0
        5 November 2018 13: 50
        Guardianship is a good thing, but know the measure.
    2. +3
      4 November 2018 09: 13
      I had the same question right away, honestly there are a lot of them, they stuck with the union and stored, who knew that would turn out like that. Only those S-300 systems are profoundly different from the current S-300 that is fire water. not to mention the 400th 500th and beyond.
      1. 0
        4 November 2018 13: 10
        Quote: bald
        I had the same question right away, honestly there are a lot of them, they stuck with the union and stored, who knew that would turn out like that. Only those S-300 systems are profoundly different from the current S-300 that is fire water. not to mention the 400th 500th and beyond.

        Ukraine has the ability to replace in its complexes both radar and missile guidance heads on a new element base. Whether she can realize them or not, I don’t presume to argue, but there is potential. And do not underestimate it.
        1. 0
          5 November 2018 13: 53
          The potential was. Almost the entire USSR worked for Yuzhmash, and now their hut from the edge and a military hopak will not help.
    3. 0
      4 November 2018 10: 14
      Quote: Theodore
      When the rockets run out ........

      ==========
      Yeah .... Surprisingly, after all, this thing is the Ukrainian army .... The more they train, the more they shoot - the lower the combat potential !!! request
      Take the rockets - ANYWHERE .... (and the reserves then melt ..., melt ...). bully
  2. +10
    4 November 2018 08: 36
    civilian sides are not shot down, and okay. laughing
    1. +9
      4 November 2018 08: 40
      Quote: newbie
      civilian sides are not shot down, and okay. laughing

      There probably civil aviation scattered from the Ukrainian territory rushed .. Those are "snipers" ..
      1. SSR
        +7
        4 November 2018 09: 02
        Quote: Little Devil
        There, probably, civil aviation scattered from Ukrainian territory scattered

        There is no air traffic in Ukraine anyway, mostly local airlines fly, all the rest fly around because they know who shot down the Boeing even without "commissions".

        C300, 19 years old! and shoots, reliable weapon.
        PS.
        I can’t attach the screen from the flight of the radar (((it’s clear that there is a stream from Poland, but bypasses everything else.
        1. +8
          4 November 2018 09: 48
          The Poles are still flyers, remember board number 1, which, in a drunken, stubby air when approaching, ditched more than a dozen of our birches. Maybe ukrov is transported along this route (brook), and maybe they bite and shoot. smile
    2. +3
      4 November 2018 08: 41
      It's not evening yet ... November 4 ... three times to knock on a tree and spit over your left shoulder ... cross your fingers ... and wait ...
    3. +1
      4 November 2018 09: 45
      there are also residential houses in the maximum radius of flight of missiles, it is necessary to check, it happened ... hi
    4. +2
      4 November 2018 11: 11
      Quote: newbie
      civilian sides are not shot down, and okay

      Still would. We zhezh, just in case, banned flights over Russia course near the training area. One flight officially deployed.
  3. +7
    4 November 2018 08: 39
    When shooting a propaganda video, no Boeing was hurt ...
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    4 November 2018 08: 41
    In this calculation, it was possible to destroy two air targets.
    ... whom are you going to shoot this time?
    1. +3
      4 November 2018 08: 59
      This is scary, apparently it’s not in vain that the French board chose to land in Poland belay
  6. +3
    4 November 2018 08: 41
    The goal of the training was to practice tasks as part of a multi-level air defense system.
    Every missile launch is like a Faberge sickle. There are no new missile arrivals. Train, train. laughing Trained useless air defense will be.
    1. +3
      4 November 2018 09: 10
      Quote: Observer2014
      Every missile launch is like a Faberge sickle. There are no new missile arrivals. Train, train. laughing Trained useless air defense will be.

      for the production of 9M38M1 equipment has long been purchased. Luch, Artem and Pavlograd in business.
      Yes, it will take some more time, but after all, in the exercises they plan both combat and imitation (which means they save)
      This year, Ukrainians are much more likely to shoot from air defense systems, which, as you see, does not lead to a decrease in the number of firing. If there were last missiles, they wouldn’t shoot.
      The most difficult question is with the air defense systems - here the partners do not help, all on their own and without the main manufacturer (RF).
    2. 0
      4 November 2018 09: 11
      Why not? "Brothers" and others like them will be thrown.
  7. +2
    4 November 2018 09: 18
    "Reconstructed" air defense systems is how ??? I myself am not a Pvoshnik, if anyone is competent, explain.
    1. +2
      4 November 2018 09: 33
      Visibly painted.
    2. 0
      4 November 2018 11: 30
      However, with conservation, but with conservation, mother drag me not to grieve, so I have to restore it!
    3. +1
      5 November 2018 14: 02
      A large replacement of components, including interblock, cab and inter-cab installation. Transfer to a semiconductor-integrated base instead of electrovacuum (where possible). In the mechanical part, a complete replacement, in the energy sector, a complete replacement, etc. In missiles, production from scratch, there is nothing to restore, the powder engines are only new.
      1. -1
        5 November 2018 18: 12
        And Ukraine is now able to produce zur for s300? they kind of started producing beech dies.
  8. -2
    4 November 2018 09: 35
    Quote: StudentVK
    "Reconstructed" air defense systems is how ??? I myself am not a Pvoshnik, if anyone is competent, explain.

    They gathered one out of five, painted over the rust, hung them with cameras from the intercoms, welded rockets from old oxygen cylinders - and to the landfill!
  9. +1
    4 November 2018 09: 41
    Well, the fact that the missiles were preserved is understandable. And that in Ukraine there are still active target missiles? What they struck there, the brain of the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Turchinov
    1. 0
      4 November 2018 11: 31
      Pff, ordinary BMka with IVC .. such a dime a dozen!
      1. 0
        4 November 2018 22: 10
        Quote: igorka357
        Pff, ordinary BMka with IVC .. such a dime a dozen!

        Somewhere you can read how many conventional BM with IVC are stored in Ukraine, or do you think the simulation of an airplane flight can be made an ordinary bucket?
  10. +2
    4 November 2018 09: 42
    militias do not have airplanes for whom are they going to shoot then?
    1. +1
      4 November 2018 14: 05
      We have airplanes, if anything, and there are pilots))
      1. -1
        4 November 2018 16: 18
        Quote: Sands Career General
        We have airplanes, if anything, and there are pilots))

        1 Su-25 and 1 L-29, it seems ....
      2. +1
        4 November 2018 17: 38
        Quote: Sands Career General
        We have airplanes, if anything, and there are pilots))

        What prompted - and so many understand ... "Smiles" at what put .. In Georgia, the Ukrainians really landed our planes - what is your joy brother do not understand ?! ...
        1. 0
          4 November 2018 19: 24
          Do we look like Ukrainian Georgia? Or the current Papuan Ukraine on that?
          1. 0
            4 November 2018 20: 48
            I think it will be necessary to help ours; I have no doubt - but the enemy must not be underestimated ...
            1. 0
              4 November 2018 20: 52
              Do not count for bragging, but we know what the enemy is capable of. As for the Ukrainian S-300, it is also known.
        2. +1
          5 November 2018 14: 06
          We landed at home without thinking at first, and as a result, the Air Force and Air Defense in Georgia completely disappeared, as did the airport in Tbiliso.
  11. +1
    4 November 2018 09: 55
    According to Turchinov, the construction of an air defense system is one of the pressing problems of the security and defense sector of Ukraine.

    In addition to the Kiev organized crime group, including and Turchinov, the US ambassador, the Security Service of Ukraine, the tsrules in the building of the Security Service of Ukraine, the Western occupation forces under the guise of trainers, terrorists and mercenaries, I do not see a threat to Ukraine’s security. If among the Ukrainian soldiers there would be people with a clear understanding of officer honor, they would have long ago demolished all this mold from the body of Ukraine.
  12. 0
    4 November 2018 13: 34
    But I won’t sell missiles to you guys ... laughing tongue wassat
  13. +1
    4 November 2018 14: 04
    They are such that they can bring down another civilian side.
    1. 0
      4 November 2018 14: 19
      Civil cunning steel - fly around the tenth road.
      1. 0
        4 November 2018 14: 25
        That's right. Flight Tracker shows))
  14. +1
    4 November 2018 16: 05
    Photos of the firing of the Ukrainian C-300:



    And this is the president of Ukraine who is watching these concerns:

  15. -1
    4 November 2018 16: 16
    the combat use of the "S-300V1 mobile anti-aircraft missile system occurred for the first time in 19 years." In this calculation, it was possible to destroy two air targets.

    What is the safety margin of Soviet weapons ... hi
    Turchinov reported on the conduct of firing at the Yagorlyk training ground (Kherson region) using restored and modified S-300 systems different modifications, "Thor", "Buk" and "Wasp-AKM".

    Where did they get the missiles for them, of good quality and in the right quantity to create
    The purpose of a multi-level air defense system.
    ?
  16. 0
    5 November 2018 01: 17
    Quote: kjhg
    Why do you immediately deprive us of such a right of self-defense as a preemptive target strike?

    This blow will not be a right to self-defense, but aggression against a neighboring country. Moreover, there is no state of war between Russia and Ukraine. And the Israelis hit Syria - but that’s understandable. Two countries have been at war for many years. And Israel does not strike at its other neighbors (Jordan, Egypt), since they have a peace treaty and there is no state of war ...

    Quote: Lara Croft
    Where did they get the missiles for them, of good quality and in the right quantity to create

    The question, of course, is interesting. But we don’t know the number of anti-aircraft missiles that are in Ukraine. For some reason, we think that they are once or twice and that's all, no more. Do not forget that the Kiev Military District was one of the most powerful districts and was packed with not only military units, but also warehouses. Considering the fact that they did not conduct air defense exercises for 10-20 years, it is not at all a fact that they do not have the required supply.
    Yes, most of Ukraine's plans to create their own air defense systems failed, but there were works (ROC) to modernize the Osa-AKM complex (Bjola ROC), Strela-10 (Dzhura ROC). Work was underway to use air-to-air missiles as missiles for short-range air defense systems (in particular, R-27 missiles (S-327 air defense systems) and R-73 and R-77 missiles (Gran air defense systems). and the hope that they have nothing left is not worth indulging yourself
    1. +1
      5 November 2018 14: 11
      Stocks of the times of the USSR have long been depleted, because even canned meat needs to be refreshed.
  17. 0
    5 November 2018 19: 49
    Quote: sheridans
    Stocks of the times of the USSR have long been depleted, because even canned meat needs to be refreshed.

    Stocks, of course, have been depleted, many have run out of warranty, but it is not known how much these stocks have been depleted. In the same Ukraine there were two brigades equipped with S-300V complexes. How many missiles were stored for this complex at the same time is unknown. It is known that 300 years did not participate in the S-19V exercises, that is, since 1999. How many times have there been exercises since the collapse of the Union - HZ.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"