Russia is increasing the combat potential of the Strategic Missile Forces

Russia is building up the combat potential of the Strategic Missile Forces, equipping regiments and divisions with modern nuclear complexes, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to the statement of Colonel-General Sergei Karakaev, commander of the Strategic Missile Forces.

According to the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, the growth of combat potential mainly comes from the transfer of strategic troops to the Yars complex, which is being replaced by Topol and Topol-M. The complex "Yars" has two options - mobile and stationary. The division into "mine or" mobile "complexes is depending on the location of the parts and their area of ​​responsibility.

Mine installations "Yars" currently stand on duty in the Kozelsk division. Mobile complexes have already taken up duty in the Teikov, Nizhny Tagil and Novosibirsk divisions, in line with the rearmament from Topol to Yarsy in the Yoshkar-Ola and Irkutsk formations. Complete re-equipment of the new complex of all divisions of the Strategic Missile Forces is planned to be completed by the year of 2026.

Yars carries several high-maneuverable and high-speed combat units in a split head with a range of more than 10 thousands of kilometers.

Earlier it was reported that the rearmament of the next regiment of the Yoshkar-Ola missile compound to the latest mobile ground rocket complexes (PGRK) of the fifth generation "Yars" is almost complete. In addition to the new PGRK, the compound received a large number of units providing for the operation, protection and combat use of Yarsov.

Comments

[MoJloT]

This is really good news, you know how to sleep better when such a forest grows.

[Bull Terrier]

Do not worry) people will come running now who will prove to you that this is not enough and we are in one place. You will sleep badly!

[Henderson]

Why should he grow?
The number of warheads is strictly limited by the START-3 treaty and is constantly monitored by "partners".
In fact, the media that has spent their resources are replaced with new ones.

[Oleg123219307]

So they are under 2000 pieces. Enough for all partners. There were certainly times when 70000 were, but in general, why?

[Henderson]

That is why there is no need. The amount available is sufficient to contain. And against all the Papuans of the Barmalei, such a weapon is still useless.

[Panslavist]

As Peter Grieffen used to say: "Oh my God, fuck us all on START III."

[Henderson]

I'm afraid the Russian economy does not care. She will not pull another arms race.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Henderson

Why should he grow?
The number of warheads is strictly limited by the START-3 treaty and is constantly monitored by "partners".
In fact, the media that has spent their resources are replaced with new ones.

It's not about quantity, but quality.

[Henderson]

And what is quality? If the booster does not fall, then the charges will be delivered to their targets without options. So far, neither Americans nor Russia have anything to bring down obsolete ICBMs in commodity quantities.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Henderson

And what is quality? If the booster does not fall, then the charges will be delivered to their targets without options. So far, neither Americans nor Russia have anything to bring down obsolete ICBMs in commodity quantities.

What about hit accuracy?

[Henderson]

Is the existing KVO of Russian missiles not enough? If I'm not mistaken, there we are talking about a maximum of a couple of hundred meters. A thousand warheads will in any case inflict unacceptable damage on the enemy. Such that he is not even going to try to climb to us.

[Underwater hunter]

This is a correct and relatively inexpensive solution, which I hope will hold back the "partners"

[Sonet]

An amazing contradiction is that if Nuclear forces develop, then land forces like T-14 and T-50 are moving so-so. Our authorities do not want to have a strong army, but they also don’t want to completely disarm themselves.

[FORCE 38GB]

everything would be fine, but the state of the Navy scares .... especially Pacific Fleet ..

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: FORCE 38RUS

everything would be fine, but the state of the Navy scares .... especially Pacific Fleet ..

And then the guys wrote that the number of ships in the Black Sea Fleet does not correspond to the required number and only the presence of coastal anti-ship missile systems and aircraft calms ... The nuclear arsenal is good. There is only one small nuisance - we may already be absent in its application. This may be a powerful argument, but its application will be the end for everyone.

[Ryzhik]

It is as if our authorities do not want to have a strong army, but they also do not want to completely disarm themselves.

It will be exactly as much as necessary so that Western partners do not squeeze the oil and gas business without significant costs. And twenty million brainless slaves. The optimal solution for effective management.

[Sailor]

Twenty million people, taking into account Ukraine and Belarus, but the quantity and quality of the fleet is really depressing and without MRA it is even weaker, and cares about it on a leftover principle, although in the event of real hostilities, it will be the first to take a hit, after all, potential "friends" (the United States and Japan) maritime powers.

[URAL72]

Sonet! So you want your own Lukoil? With all the goodies - villas around the world, yachts, planes? About such a cheap thing as a Bentley or Rolls Royce, I am already silent. Can you? So the state, the plans are huge, but the pockets are thin. We focus on the main thing - on the potential for guaranteed unacceptable damage, the rest, as far as possible. There is no need for oligarchs and corruption - you are hardly a communist, and nobody in the world has dealt with the latter, not even Kim.

[rocket757]

And what will we threaten the Swedes, Norwegians and other minor?
That agreement will be canceled \ pohh-bury the INF Treaty then will be what. We’ll save the most zimus for distant, transatlantic, if sho.
Of course expensive, but so far nothing else. restraining.
But in the country it’s necessary to restore order, otherwise we’ll just stay with the missiles, and the rest, including. peaceful forces are not enough.

[NEXUS]

Quote: rocket757

And what will we threaten the Swedes, Norwegians and other minor?

ICBM Frontier for example. Moreover, in the mobile version, this ICBM will block the whole of Europe in the most BV.

[rocket757]

Like, son of a Pioneer! Will do!
Well, I say, Schaub painted especially greyhound targets on his forehead, Schaub did not suffer, if sho!
What they don’t live in peace does not understand.

[Astronaut]

And for me "Barguzin" is better Here she was - and no ...

[rocket757]

Barguzin, Club, ..... please announce the whole list, but our western neighbors have not yet decided whether to draw targets on the forehead or stand aside! Convincing, vigorous arguments on the podium, let's go under - I went to the shore of Katyusha, to a high shore on a steep !!! -

[ANCIENT]

urgently needs to be developed in connection with the withdrawal of the usa from the missile treaty, the version of the yars with a small flight length of 600 to 1500 km is like a response to europe on the pro system in poland and romania.

[NEXUS]

Quote: ANCIENT

missile version of the yars with a small flight length of 600 to 1500 km

It has already been developed and tested back in the 15th year. This is the RS-26 Boundary ... solid fuel. And at the moment it is in pre-production condition. As soon as the mattresses are withdrawn from the contract, I am sure it will be put into production, and they will equip the mobile complexes with Frontiers. At the same time, they will untie our hands on the Barguzin BZHRD, also with Boundaries.

[igfrost1957]

Yarsy is certainly good, but "Barguzin" is also needed.

[FORCE 38GB]

Unfortunately, not a single depot remained for "Barguzin". We need to build from scratch ... some ruins near Krasnoyarsk ...

[Astronaut]

not even a depot was left

Why does Barguzin need a depot?

[malyvalv]

THERE no one unfortunately does not provide for the option of installing a bug by spies on Barguzin, after which the entire disguise loses its meaning.

[Ezekiel 25-17]

Somewhere 450 you need to have: 150 in the mines, 150 on trains, 150 on a mobile chassis. Then no one DARKS ...

[mvg]

150 on trains

Not weak. In the days of the mighty USSR there was not a tenth ...

[andr327]

There is something quiet about Sarmat. Although I love mobile complexes, this club is very necessary for intimidation.
About the INF Treaty - it is necessary to rewrite the main condition - placement only on its territory. All questions will disappear, although the Americans will not agree to this.
It’s true why they put such a beautiful cargo model in the photo, is there really no normal poplar Poplar-M or Yars.

[Astronaut]

About Sarmat something is quiet

at 21m on duty will rise, recently the information has passed

[Yasir]

They are preparing mines for the "Sarmatians" day and night work is underway .. EBN destroyed a lot, but still kept something

[Astronaut]

There is no need to build mines for Sarmat, he will stand in the mines instead of Satan

[Yasir]

Quote: Astronaut

There is no need to build mines for Sarmat, he will stand in the mines instead of Satan

You understand a lot .. Many mines just blew up the entrances, etc. So that the "metalworkers" in the 89-90s did not climb .. They took away and dirtied everything that was on top! The caps were picked by tractors, etc.
Inside, everything has been preserved !!!!

[Astronaut]

You understand a lot

I see.

[Old26]

Quote: NEXUS

It has already been developed and tested back in the 15th year. This is the RS-26 Boundary ... solid fuel. And at the moment is in pre-production condition.

She is not in pre-production, but in limbo. The military doesn’t need it as an ICBM with its parameters, and if the United States leaves the INF Treaty, then after a test cycle with a heavier warhead, we can get an anti-missile defense. True, the question remains about the chassis for the APU of this complex. Minsk chassis is not purchased; KAMAZ has not yet been tested.

Quote: NEXUS

As soon as the mattresses are withdrawn from the contract, I am sure it will be put into production, and they will equip the mobile complexes with Frontiers.

It can be put into production even now. At the same time, having moved the rearmament of the Strategic Missile Forces with new ICBMs from 2026 to possibly 2030 or 2036. Which is better. Plus, the fleet will have ready-made boats, but not the fact that they will have ammunition ready. I wrote about the chassis above. If the Americans come out, for example, in December, then in May we will no longer have "Frontiers". It's corny there will be nothing to put them on ...

Quote: NEXUS

At the same time, they will untie our hands on the Barguzin BZHRD, also with Boundaries.

And Karakaev knows that the BZHRK will have "Rubezhi" and not "Yars-2" or "Yars-S". It is utter folly to spend tens and hundreds of billions to deploy ONE DIVISION. It is easier and cheaper to deploy one additional regiment in existing divisions.

Quote: FORCE 38RUS

Unfortunately, not a single depot remained for "Barguzin". We need to build from scratch ... some ruins near Krasnoyarsk ...

Not only near Krasnoyarsk, but also in other places too. There is nothing. No depot, no rolling stock, no military camps. No one can tell how much navigation devices have been preserved on old routes

Quote: Ezekiel 25-17

Somewhere 450 you need to have: 150 in the mines, 150 on trains, 150 on a mobile chassis. Then no one DARKS ...

So, with all its might, the Soviet Union was able to deploy only three divisions of the BZHRK out of 7 planned, and you, sorry, rolled your lips into as many as 5 divisions? There is nowhere to put money, throwing out hundreds of billions, or even trillions of rubles?
On the mobile chassis, after the rearmament of the Topley-M to the Yarsy, there will already be approximately 190-200 launchers. There are no more than 15 mines intended for this, again after the rearmament to Yarsy from the Topol-M and Stilet complexes (35A120). There is a shortage of 30 mines. And nowhere to take. We cannot build new ones under the contract
who dares to start a nuclear war even now when we have what we have? There are no fools ...

Quote: andr327

There is something quiet about Sarmat. Although I love mobile complexes, I really need this club for intimidation ..

The first flight test is planned for the 4th quarter of 2018. When exactly - is unknown.

Quote: andr327

About the INF Treaty - it is necessary to rewrite the main condition - placement only on its territory. All questions will disappear, although the Americans will not agree to this ..

The condition is impossible in advance. And if there are negotiations on the INF-2, this condition will be clearly "impassable"

Quote: andr327

It’s true why they put such a beautiful cargo model in the photo, is there really no normal poplar Poplar-M or Yars.

This is not a cargo layout. This is the 15T418 unit - the unit for the maintenance of the technical lock string PGRK 15P155 "Topol-M" and 15P155M "Yars".

Because of its technical and weight and size characteristics (absolutely similar to APU characteristics, unless there are jacks and AGK), the unit for supporting the technical circuit column RK 15P155, was used in training units for initial training of drivers of the APU (warrant officer school) or training of specialists in calculating APU (working out issues related to the preparation of sites for installing APU, minimizing and deploying APU, masking). In combat units, an escort vehicle was used to conduct practical driving of APU driver mechanics, as well as to check the condition of roads, bridges, overpasses on the movement routes of PGRK 79221P15 units. Well, it could be used as a fuel tank

[andr327]

Well, it could be used as a fuel tank

for diesel fuel and gasoline too much and dangerous, for fuel oil too dirty, but for water in fire tanks just right

[wellaut]

I wonder when it comes to Yurya-2?

[Old26]

Quote: wellaut

I wonder when it comes to Yurya-2?

Hardly anytime soon. Although it is now considered not deployed, it nevertheless carries a database. It may be that over time they will replace the current complex, deployed there with a new one, but so far nothing has been heard ...

Quote: andr327

for diesel fuel and gasoline too much and dangerous, for fuel oil too dirty, but for water in fire tanks just right

Could, but not used ...

[zloijjet]

An additional argument in any negotiations ...

[aszzz888]

... and it pleases, despite the cries of the hostesses ...

[Old26]

Quote: Astronaut

There is no need to build mines for Sarmat, he will stand in the mines instead of Satan

No need to build. But upgrade for sure. Even when changing the complex with the R-36M UTTKh missile to the R-36M2 rocket, it was necessary to modernize the mines, because it was simply impossible to place the Voyevods in the mines from the UTTKh without modification

Quote: mvg

150 on trains

Not weak. In the days of the mighty USSR there was not a tenth ...

There were 36 items on EMNIP 12 trains. A quarter of the quantity proposed. Although in the USSR it was planned to deploy 7 divisions, and only 3 were deployed, moreover, even in the third, the infrastructure was not completely built up (in the Krasnoyarsk division)