Military Review

Russia is increasing the combat potential of the Strategic Missile Forces

45
Russia is building up the combat potential of the Strategic Missile Forces, equipping regiments and divisions with modern nuclear complexes, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta with reference to the statement of Colonel-General Sergei Karakaev, commander of the Strategic Missile Forces.


Russia is increasing the combat potential of the Strategic Missile Forces


According to the commander of the Strategic Missile Forces, the growth of combat potential mainly comes from the transfer of strategic troops to the Yars complex, which is being replaced by Topol and Topol-M. The complex "Yars" has two options - mobile and stationary. The division into "mine or" mobile "complexes is depending on the location of the parts and their area of ​​responsibility.

Mine installations "Yars" currently stand on duty in the Kozelsk division. Mobile complexes have already taken up duty in the Teikov, Nizhny Tagil and Novosibirsk divisions, in line with the rearmament from Topol to Yarsy in the Yoshkar-Ola and Irkutsk formations. Complete re-equipment of the new complex of all divisions of the Strategic Missile Forces is planned to be completed by the year of 2026.

Yars carries several high-maneuverable and high-speed combat units in a split head with a range of more than 10 thousands of kilometers.

Earlier it was reported that the rearmament of the next regiment of the Yoshkar-Ola missile compound to the latest mobile ground rocket complexes (PGRK) of the fifth generation "Yars" is almost complete. In addition to the new PGRK, the compound received a large number of units providing for the operation, protection and combat use of Yarsov.


Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. MoJloT
    MoJloT 2 November 2018 14: 04
    +11
    This is really good news, you know how to sleep better when such a forest grows.
    1. Bull Terrier
      Bull Terrier 2 November 2018 14: 15
      -2
      Do not worry) people will come running now who will prove to you that this is not enough and we are in one place. You will sleep badly!
    2. Henderson
      Henderson 2 November 2018 14: 16
      +1
      Why should he grow?
      The number of warheads is strictly limited by the START-3 treaty and is constantly monitored by "partners".
      In fact, the media that has spent their resources are replaced with new ones.
      1. Oleg123219307
        Oleg123219307 2 November 2018 16: 09
        +1
        So they are under 2000 pieces. Enough for all partners. There were certainly times when 70000 were, but in general, why?
        1. Henderson
          Henderson 3 November 2018 09: 22
          0
          That is why there is no need. The amount available is sufficient to contain. And against all the Papuans of the Barmalei, such a weapon is still useless.
      2. Panslavist
        Panslavist 2 November 2018 16: 41
        +3
        As Peter Grieffen used to say: "Oh my God, fuck us all on START III."
        1. Henderson
          Henderson 3 November 2018 09: 21
          +1
          I'm afraid the Russian economy does not care. She will not pull another arms race.
      3. Piramidon
        Piramidon 2 November 2018 16: 51
        +1
        Quote: Henderson
        Why should he grow?
        The number of warheads is strictly limited by the START-3 treaty and is constantly monitored by "partners".
        In fact, the media that has spent their resources are replaced with new ones.

        It's not about quantity, but quality.
        1. Henderson
          Henderson 3 November 2018 09: 20
          0
          And what is quality? If the booster does not fall, then the charges will be delivered to their targets without options. So far, neither Americans nor Russia have anything to bring down obsolete ICBMs in commodity quantities.
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 3 November 2018 13: 39
            0
            Quote: Henderson
            And what is quality? If the booster does not fall, then the charges will be delivered to their targets without options. So far, neither Americans nor Russia have anything to bring down obsolete ICBMs in commodity quantities.

            What about hit accuracy?
            1. Henderson
              Henderson 4 November 2018 15: 14
              0
              Is the existing KVO of Russian missiles not enough? If I'm not mistaken, there we are talking about a maximum of a couple of hundred meters. A thousand warheads will in any case inflict unacceptable damage on the enemy. Such that he is not even going to try to climb to us.
  2. Underwater hunter
    Underwater hunter 2 November 2018 14: 05
    +1
    This is a correct and relatively inexpensive solution, which I hope will hold back the "partners"
  3. Sonet
    Sonet 2 November 2018 14: 14
    -2
    An amazing contradiction is that if Nuclear forces develop, then land forces like T-14 and T-50 are moving so-so. Our authorities do not want to have a strong army, but they also don’t want to completely disarm themselves.
    1. FORCE 38GB
      FORCE 38GB 2 November 2018 14: 17
      +7
      everything would be fine, but the state of the Navy scares .... especially Pacific Fleet ..
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 2 November 2018 14: 28
        +1
        Quote: FORCE 38RUS
        everything would be fine, but the state of the Navy scares .... especially Pacific Fleet ..

        And then the guys wrote that the number of ships in the Black Sea Fleet does not correspond to the required number and only the presence of coastal anti-ship missile systems and aircraft calms ... The nuclear arsenal is good. There is only one small nuisance - we may already be absent in its application. This may be a powerful argument, but its application will be the end for everyone.
    2. Ryzhik
      Ryzhik 2 November 2018 14: 27
      -1
      It is as if our authorities do not want to have a strong army, but they also do not want to completely disarm themselves.

      It will be exactly as much as necessary so that Western partners do not squeeze the oil and gas business without significant costs. And twenty million brainless slaves. The optimal solution for effective management.
      1. Sailor
        Sailor 2 November 2018 14: 40
        +2
        Twenty million people, taking into account Ukraine and Belarus, but the quantity and quality of the fleet is really depressing and without MRA it is even weaker, and cares about it on a leftover principle, although in the event of real hostilities, it will be the first to take a hit, after all, potential "friends" (the United States and Japan) maritime powers.
    3. URAL72
      URAL72 2 November 2018 14: 36
      +6
      Sonet! So you want your own Lukoil? With all the goodies - villas around the world, yachts, planes? About such a cheap thing as a Bentley or Rolls Royce, I am already silent. Can you? So the state, the plans are huge, but the pockets are thin. We focus on the main thing - on the potential for guaranteed unacceptable damage, the rest, as far as possible. There is no need for oligarchs and corruption - you are hardly a communist, and nobody in the world has dealt with the latter, not even Kim.
  4. rocket757
    rocket757 2 November 2018 14: 32
    +2
    And what will we threaten the Swedes, Norwegians and other minor?
    That agreement will be canceled \ pohh-bury the INF Treaty then will be what. We’ll save the most zimus for distant, transatlantic, if sho.
    Of course expensive, but so far nothing else. restraining.
    But in the country it’s necessary to restore order, otherwise we’ll just stay with the missiles, and the rest, including. peaceful forces are not enough.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 2 November 2018 14: 48
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      And what will we threaten the Swedes, Norwegians and other minor?

      ICBM Frontier for example. Moreover, in the mobile version, this ICBM will block the whole of Europe in the most BV.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 2 November 2018 19: 29
        +2
        Like, son of a Pioneer! Will do!
        Well, I say, Schaub painted especially greyhound targets on his forehead, Schaub did not suffer, if sho!
        What they don’t live in peace does not understand.
      2. Astronaut
        Astronaut 2 November 2018 21: 06
        +1
        And for me "Barguzin" is better wink Here she was - and no ...
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 2 November 2018 21: 29
          -1
          Barguzin, Club, ..... please announce the whole list, but our western neighbors have not yet decided whether to draw targets on the forehead or stand aside! Convincing, vigorous arguments on the podium, let's go under - I went to the shore of Katyusha, to a high shore on a steep !!! -
  5. ANCIENT
    ANCIENT 2 November 2018 14: 33
    0
    urgently needs to be developed in connection with the withdrawal of the usa from the missile treaty, the version of the yars with a small flight length of 600 to 1500 km is like a response to europe on the pro system in poland and romania.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 2 November 2018 14: 51
      +5
      Quote: ANCIENT
      missile version of the yars with a small flight length of 600 to 1500 km

      It has already been developed and tested back in the 15th year. This is the RS-26 Boundary ... solid fuel. And at the moment it is in pre-production condition. As soon as the mattresses are withdrawn from the contract, I am sure it will be put into production, and they will equip the mobile complexes with Frontiers. At the same time, they will untie our hands on the Barguzin BZHRD, also with Boundaries.
  6. igfrost1957
    igfrost1957 2 November 2018 14: 36
    +1
    Yarsy is certainly good, but "Barguzin" is also needed.
    1. FORCE 38GB
      FORCE 38GB 2 November 2018 15: 00
      0
      Unfortunately, not a single depot remained for "Barguzin". We need to build from scratch ... some ruins near Krasnoyarsk ...
      1. Astronaut
        Astronaut 2 November 2018 21: 10
        0
        not even a depot was left

        Why does Barguzin need a depot?
      2. cost 983
        cost 983 2 November 2018 21: 18
        0
        In Kostroma there is.
    2. malyvalv
      malyvalv 2 November 2018 19: 40
      0
      THERE no one unfortunately does not provide for the option of installing a bug by spies on Barguzin, after which the entire disguise loses its meaning.
  7. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 2 November 2018 15: 10
    +2
    Somewhere 450 you need to have: 150 in the mines, 150 on trains, 150 on a mobile chassis. Then no one DARKS ...
    1. mvg
      mvg 2 November 2018 16: 15
      +1
      150 on trains

      wassat
      Not weak. In the days of the mighty USSR there was not a tenth ...
  8. andr327
    andr327 2 November 2018 15: 38
    +1
    There is something quiet about Sarmat. Although I love mobile complexes, this club is very necessary for intimidation.
    About the INF Treaty - it is necessary to rewrite the main condition - placement only on its territory. All questions will disappear, although the Americans will not agree to this.
    It’s true why they put such a beautiful cargo model in the photo, is there really no normal poplar Poplar-M or Yars.
    1. Astronaut
      Astronaut 2 November 2018 21: 12
      0
      About Sarmat something is quiet

      at 21m on duty will rise, recently the information has passed
  9. Yasir
    Yasir 2 November 2018 16: 36
    +2
    They are preparing mines for the "Sarmatians" day and night work is underway .. EBN destroyed a lot, but still kept something
    1. Astronaut
      Astronaut 2 November 2018 21: 14
      0
      There is no need to build mines for Sarmat, he will stand in the mines instead of Satan
      1. Yasir
        Yasir 3 November 2018 01: 03
        0
        Quote: Astronaut
        There is no need to build mines for Sarmat, he will stand in the mines instead of Satan

        You understand a lot .. Many mines just blew up the entrances, etc. So that the "metalworkers" in the 89-90s did not climb .. They took away and dirtied everything that was on top! The caps were picked by tractors, etc. laughing
        Inside, everything has been preserved !!!!
        1. Astronaut
          Astronaut 3 November 2018 19: 25
          0
          You understand a lot

          I see. wink
  10. Old26
    Old26 2 November 2018 16: 49
    +4
    Quote: NEXUS
    It has already been developed and tested back in the 15th year. This is the RS-26 Boundary ... solid fuel. And at the moment is in pre-production condition.

    She is not in pre-production, but in limbo. The military doesn’t need it as an ICBM with its parameters, and if the United States leaves the INF Treaty, then after a test cycle with a heavier warhead, we can get an anti-missile defense. True, the question remains about the chassis for the APU of this complex. Minsk chassis is not purchased; KAMAZ has not yet been tested.

    Quote: NEXUS
    As soon as the mattresses are withdrawn from the contract, I am sure it will be put into production, and they will equip the mobile complexes with Frontiers.

    It can be put into production even now. At the same time, having moved the rearmament of the Strategic Missile Forces with new ICBMs from 2026 to possibly 2030 or 2036. Which is better. Plus, the fleet will have ready-made boats, but not the fact that they will have ammunition ready. I wrote about the chassis above. If the Americans come out, for example, in December, then in May we will no longer have "Frontiers". It's corny there will be nothing to put them on ...

    Quote: NEXUS
    At the same time, they will untie our hands on the Barguzin BZHRD, also with Boundaries.

    And Karakaev knows that the BZHRK will have "Rubezhi" and not "Yars-2" or "Yars-S". It is utter folly to spend tens and hundreds of billions to deploy ONE DIVISION. It is easier and cheaper to deploy one additional regiment in existing divisions.

    Quote: FORCE 38RUS
    Unfortunately, not a single depot remained for "Barguzin". We need to build from scratch ... some ruins near Krasnoyarsk ...

    Not only near Krasnoyarsk, but also in other places too. There is nothing. No depot, no rolling stock, no military camps. No one can tell how much navigation devices have been preserved on old routes

    Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
    Somewhere 450 you need to have: 150 in the mines, 150 on trains, 150 on a mobile chassis. Then no one DARKS ...

    So, with all its might, the Soviet Union was able to deploy only three divisions of the BZHRK out of 7 planned, and you, sorry, rolled your lips into as many as 5 divisions? There is nowhere to put money, throwing out hundreds of billions, or even trillions of rubles?
    On the mobile chassis, after the rearmament of the Topley-M to the Yarsy, there will already be approximately 190-200 launchers. There are no more than 15 mines intended for this, again after the rearmament to Yarsy from the Topol-M and Stilet complexes (35A120). There is a shortage of 30 mines. And nowhere to take. We cannot build new ones under the contract
    who dares to start a nuclear war even now when we have what we have? There are no fools ...

    Quote: andr327
    There is something quiet about Sarmat. Although I love mobile complexes, I really need this club for intimidation ..

    The first flight test is planned for the 4th quarter of 2018. When exactly - is unknown.

    Quote: andr327
    About the INF Treaty - it is necessary to rewrite the main condition - placement only on its territory. All questions will disappear, although the Americans will not agree to this ..

    The condition is impossible in advance. And if there are negotiations on the INF-2, this condition will be clearly "impassable"

    Quote: andr327
    It’s true why they put such a beautiful cargo model in the photo, is there really no normal poplar Poplar-M or Yars.

    This is not a cargo layout. This is the 15T418 unit - the unit for the maintenance of the technical lock string PGRK 15P155 "Topol-M" and 15P155M "Yars".

    Because of its technical and weight and size characteristics (absolutely similar to APU characteristics, unless there are jacks and AGK), the unit for supporting the technical circuit column RK 15P155, was used in training units for initial training of drivers of the APU (warrant officer school) or training of specialists in calculating APU (working out issues related to the preparation of sites for installing APU, minimizing and deploying APU, masking). In combat units, an escort vehicle was used to conduct practical driving of APU driver mechanics, as well as to check the condition of roads, bridges, overpasses on the movement routes of PGRK 79221P15 units. Well, it could be used as a fuel tank
    1. andr327
      andr327 2 November 2018 18: 31
      0
      Well, it could be used as a fuel tank

      for diesel fuel and gasoline too much and dangerous, for fuel oil too dirty, but for water in fire tanks just right lol
  11. wellaut
    wellaut 2 November 2018 17: 56
    0
    I wonder when it comes to Yurya-2?
  12. Old26
    Old26 2 November 2018 18: 44
    0
    Quote: wellaut
    I wonder when it comes to Yurya-2?

    Hardly anytime soon. Although it is now considered not deployed, it nevertheless carries a database. It may be that over time they will replace the current complex, deployed there with a new one, but so far nothing has been heard ...

    Quote: andr327
    for diesel fuel and gasoline too much and dangerous, for fuel oil too dirty, but for water in fire tanks just right

    Could, but not used ...
  13. zloijjet
    zloijjet 2 November 2018 22: 33
    0
    An additional argument in any negotiations ...
  14. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 November 2018 02: 15
    0
    ... and it pleases, despite the cries of the hostesses ... good
  15. Old26
    Old26 3 November 2018 11: 27
    0
    Quote: Astronaut
    There is no need to build mines for Sarmat, he will stand in the mines instead of Satan

    No need to build. But upgrade for sure. Even when changing the complex with the R-36M UTTKh missile to the R-36M2 rocket, it was necessary to modernize the mines, because it was simply impossible to place the Voyevods in the mines from the UTTKh without modification

    Quote: mvg
    150 on trains

    wassat
    Not weak. In the days of the mighty USSR there was not a tenth ...

    There were 36 items on EMNIP 12 trains. A quarter of the quantity proposed. Although in the USSR it was planned to deploy 7 divisions, and only 3 were deployed, moreover, even in the third, the infrastructure was not completely built up (in the Krasnoyarsk division)