Russian REX 1 - impenetrable drones protection

Created by the designers of the Russian company Zala Aero Group (part of the Kalashnikov concern), the REX 1 electronic gun can provide impenetrable protection against drones, writes Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

This compact product was shown at the Interpolitex-2018 International Exhibition in Moscow.

Anti-terrorist operations in Syria and Iraq have demonstrated that even small UAVs can pose a serious danger to both troops and civilians.

Drones can correct artillery and rocket fire, deliver reconnaissance information to the enemy about defensive positions and transport communications, and strike at important targets.

So in the Middle East, terrorists turned simple drones into miniature bombers, who dropped their ammunition on equipment and manpower of government troops. In Iraq, for example, armored Hummers were destroyed with drones, and in Syria, an ammunition depot was completely destroyed as a result of one of these attacks.

Today, the tactics of terrorists are being mastered in the Ukrainian army: small UAVs began bombing the defensive positions of the armed forces of the self-proclaimed republics in the Donbass.

Therefore, the opposition to such a threat is now very relevant, the newspaper notes.

Presented at the exhibition REX 1 is able to suppress the control signals of the drone at a distance of 500 meters. And satellite navigation signals are suppressed in a radius up to 2 km. As a result, the drones completely lose their orientation in space and fall to the ground.

To disable the onboard opto-electronic equipment has a laser. The temperature of the product is from minus 40 to plus 50 degrees Celsius. Continuous operation time - 3 hours. Weight gun - 4,5 kg, length - 70 cm.

According to experts, REX 1 is currently one of the most advanced means of protection against drones in its class.

Comments

[bogart047]

God forbid, Medvedev’s mansion will be filmed on camera ...

[GTYCBJYTH2021]

So there is a network of images of the mansion, the territories adjacent to Medvedev .... or another person .....

[SRC P-15]

Russian REX 1

Pranksters our gunsmiths: read the name of the gun from right to left ...

[Gray brother]

Quote: СРЦ П-15

Pranksters our gunsmiths: read the name of the gun from right to left ...

Not only our gunsmiths are funny - the word "Kremlin" is easily formed from the word "Merkel".

[Machito]

And from the word Yandex, if you attach a mirror, it turns out ..... she. Interestingly, a gun in Syria have already experienced?

[Arh]

A good shotgun, I was pleased, there will probably be like hot cakes, if only in the Donbass !!!

[san4es]

According to experts, REX 1 is currently one of the most advanced means of protection against drones in its class.

[MANITU]

A good shotgun, I was pleased, there will probably be like hot cakes, if only in the Donbass !!!

I agree. We look forward to seeing you with a gun. I guarantee bread and salt)))))))

[Vasyan1971]

Quote: SRC P-15

Russian REX 1

Pranksters our gunsmiths: read the name of the gun from right to left ...

One REX!

[Dr.KonradMorgen]

"Impenetrable protection" was not, is not and never will be. Never. Not from drones, not from anything else. The conventional "shell" always wins over the conventional "armor" in the end.

[Jerk]

See World War I - the trench warfare. And that’s all - the shield defeated the sword, Germany lost only economically, the war ended in FOREIGN territory - and no tanks helped

[Dr.KonradMorgen]

And yet - before the imperial government submitted an official request to the allies to conclude an armistice and begin peace negotiations - the Field General Staff declared that it was unable to guarantee the preservation of the front line configuration for more than two days. Something - very unlike a "shield victory" ...

[Jerk]

Economically, then - the sword also defeated the shield, the cause of the war was not the redistribution of the colonies, but an attempt to break through the German industry to the European market protected from it by the shield, where British industry dominated. If you don't know, before WWI, "German quality" sounded like "Chinese" 20 years ago. They dumped shamelessly, and the quality was bad - therefore they were ready to throw products for a pittance, but who will give them? I had to use the sword - the economic sword lost to the shield too.

[Dr.KonradMorgen]

Do not know. For I roughly know what the concept of "German quality" meant before the First World War.

[Jerk]

Ask why on German ships in the WWI the armor was thicker than on the English "The famous Krupp steel"
And generally speaking:
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/745316
Self-education has not bothered anyone else ...

The British economist E. Williams wrote in 1897 that German export goods are called cheap and bad everywhere, even in Germany itself: "Cheap and rotten - there was a verdict of one outspoken German about some of the works of his homeland, seen by him abroad, and everyone is inclined to be surprised how, with such a bad and ubiquitous reputation, a German product can have any success in any world market. "

He knows ... Wikipedia, go and write it too?

The well-known American firm "Singer" had production in Germany, but, not wanting to scare away customers, resorted to a similar trick:

“One German firm,” wrote a contemporary, “importing sewing machines in large quantities into England, clearly marked Singers and North British Sewing Machines, puts the stamp“ Made in Germany ”, printed in microscopic letters, under the footboard. less than half a dozen seamstresses, so that by common efforts turn the machine upside down and read the inscription, otherwise it must forever remain unread. "

"About"

[Dr.KonradMorgen]

About sewing machines - not in the know. But that the German dreadnought as of 1914 (and even 1916) were much better than the British - including due to better armor protection, and due to the greater speed of the most complete progress, and due to the quality of fire control devices, and thanks to - I know the gunpowder.

[Tatar 174]

Quote: Dr.KonradMorgen

"Impenetrable protection" was not, is not and never will be. Never

Exactly, especially from scrap But, there is another saying that for any tricky nut there is the same tricky bolt and it often even happens that the answer is very simple and reliable.

[papik09]

And if the bolt has a left thread then tryndets kitten , more ... will not be

[Doliva63]

Quote: Dr.KonradMorgen

"Impenetrable protection" was not, is not and never will be. Never. Not from drones, not from anything else. The conventional "shell" always wins over the conventional "armor" in the end.

Nothing like this. It is not the shell / armor that wins, but the art and the possibilities of their application.

[Vladimir 5]

So fasten this PEX-1 gun to the UAV and with an approach to suppress and land the enemy UAV - remove it from the sky without noise and dust ...

[Machito]

Battles between UAVs are a matter of the near future. Rogozin is already training pilots in "War Thunder". The best teams will go to the front

[Dr.KonradMorgen]

Okay - I'll say "general": the art of striking always trumps the art of defense.

[Examenatornick]

all this is not necessary stuff. Who will be at night on the street in bad weather to monitor the night sky with this gun? stationary jammers only

[MIG00001]

connected to external power and direct in the right direction, here's the work without restriction

[Examenatornick]

imagine yourself in the night (even if with a thermal imager constantly turning his head and realizing that there is a drone nearby somewhere ready to throw a bomb on your head. And use a Bosko to swing a diaper (relatively speaking). Only a stationary jammer with detection in kilometers to the protected object.

[VIT101]

Quote: Examenatornick

Who will be at night on the street in bad weather to monitor the night sky with this gun?

And why should someone monitor in bad weather? To do this, there are surveillance radars that are constantly in operation. As soon as the drones are spotted, the defeat team will pass. And who will destroy, armor or Rexy, depends on the situation.

[Machito]

To spot small drones is not an easy task. Our already ornichoptors produce. Next in line insectocopters

[MANITU]

this is not necessary rubbish. Who will be at night on the street in bad weather to monitor the night sky with this gun? stationary jammers only

I think they are right, as for the security forces - rather primitive. But for private security structures, for the protection of villas, or for cleaning airport zones from "hooligans" - a normal commercial product.

[Red_Baron]

Have you reviewed the movies? Where are some villas guarded by heaps of soldiers who patrol with weapons?
Not the fact that it will be possible for private security structures to use such a device legally. Because it is also possible for an airplane to turn off something flying over. And even more so for the airport.
For large, objects should be something automatic, installed. What is already applied in some countries, not so long ago there was an article on HE.

[MANITU]

Have you reviewed the movies? Where are some villas guarded by heaps of soldiers who patrol with weapons?

What kind of soldiers are you talking about? Read the post carefully. The villas of wealthy Latinos in Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia are guarded better than some military facilities))))))) If private paramilitary structures are allowed to have automatic weapons and grenade launchers, then anti-drone weapons are certainly not. These anti-drone "guns" have already appeared in the world like dirt. https://habr.com/company/coptertime/blog/405537/
(this is not all samples)

Because it is also possible for an airplane to turn off something flying over. And even more so for the airport.

You are far from the topic ... The problem of drones near airports has already been raised in the world more than once.
It is problematic for an airplane to turn off something remotely in general, and with this weapon - in particular (the principle of operation (it does not turn off anything!), Frequencies, direction of action, power - for small drones at short distances). You can interfere with communications, but the plane will land and take off normally. GPS is not needed for landing and takeoff. But large "jammers" can actually do much harm at the airport.

[GTYCBJYTH2021]

From parts, microcircuits, diodes, thyristors, etc. whose production is the gun assembled? The Chinese made electronics ..... gave it to us ..... we are plastic, from which panels for "Zhiguli" are poured .....

[nik-karata]

And again, having no analogues !!!! Bravo!
Amid the destruction of their own people, genocidal domestic and lack of foreign policy.
It would be better to have euthanasia. I am sure that from a million pensioners not needed by the GOVERNMENT would have been disposed of in one fell swoop. Yes, and terminally ill single people would not fail to take advantage. And they all are fighting !!!

[Machito]

And will Americans give pensioners pensioners?

[Mestny]

Generally fun to read comments. One is crying about the Chinese components, the other is hustling like sticking Rogozin here.
And finally, the cherry on the cake - about pensioners.
Interestingly, they understand that they are already getting ridiculous?
I wonder if the authors understand the ideology that has been filled in their heads that it’s time to modernize it, the revolution did not work, the Maidan will not happen, and Putin will not leave?

[Red_Baron]

There will always be crazy people. Rather, these will mainly be. A normal person reads a news article or something else and adds information from it to his knowledge on this topic, shares some thoughts, reads and discusses what he has read. Everything seems to be logical.
Unhealthy on the head of a person is so impossible. They are looking everywhere for a sensation, something new, hidden. Because in order to understand something, you need to learn, read, find out, check your opinion, discuss and so on - in addition to directly knowing to participate in the information process. It is long, hard, difficult, etc. But if somewhere they started a rumor, made a throw-in and the next messiah told the truth - here it is a quick and cheap sensation. Nothing needs to be done, it is only necessary to disseminate and be a carrier of valuable information hidden from all. Around some fools, they don’t know such important things, they urgently need to be enlightened on the one hand to show themselves at least as a small guru, on the other to teach at least someone at least something. And these people begin to insert their incontinence into any comments in any possible sources.
The fact that this is illogical, anti-scientific, stupid, inconsistent and so on does not bother anyone. And if it’s still in some kind of trend, then they will be instructed in the pluses.
But all right, the meanness of such people kills me the most. At first they whine in all directions that this or that is little covered, not only as they hide from the people. But as soon as someone for them begins to cover the topic, they immediately begin to scoff at him, catch on a word, dig into phrases and so on. I want to ask - so what you need is if it is so bad anyway. And that and that, that they need, like grandmothers at the entrance to sit and tryndet about something, to pick up someone and stuff like that.

[Senior manager]

Quote: Red_Baron

At first they whine in all directions that this or that is little covered, not only as they hide from the people. But as soon as someone for them begins to cover the topic, they immediately begin to scoff at him, catch on a word, dig into phrases and so on.

Put a plus. Individuals have such traits - to increase their self-esteem by belittling the successes of others. This is also called criticism. This phenomenon does not draw on disease, but completely on deviations from the norm.

[Red_Baron]

I'm not a little about these. Criticism is not so scary, although not pleasant.
I'm more about really unhealthy people. I am not a doctor and I cannot say in each case what happened to them. The real one is schizophrenia or some other problem that led to this. I have argued with many of these people. They, in their kind of criticism, can not give a single argument, except "everyone is clear," "everyone has known for a long time," and in that spirit. They cannot answer the main questions about their theses.
I call this not scientifically - people live in their own world. They do not try to understand and figure out how and why it happens, they take a phrase somewhere, an idea and then come up with their own reality, sacredly believe in it and constantly refer to it. During the argument, they begin to grimace, try to insult, divert the topic to the side, get to the bottom of something, do not answer questions, and as a result, everything goes around in circles. Sometimes it is possible, according to them, to even understand where they got their main idea from, but not always.
As an example, I have a friend, he got into the habit of writing political articles in this spirit on one free source - "analysis of the systemic crisis in Russia" I read it and was stunned. The Skype correspondence gave nothing. Because I first wrote to him that he uses a lot of terms wrong. I wrote a term for him, then took the interpretation from various dictionaries and showed it, then took modern articles where this term was used and again showed him that there would be no doubts. Well, how can you argue if a person speaks another language at all. He began how to do - he took the word, and the meaning for him from a similar word, the meaning that he liked more. Only I checked the search and pointed out to him for forgery. Then he simply said that I got to the bottom of a few words. OK. I wrote a huge sheet, took his phrase, disassembled it, presented arguments and supported them with references to various documents and materials. For example, he announced the signs of a federal state and gave a bunch of arguments about this. I first found these signs in the encyclopedia, and then I found more extensive material, it seems, Moscow State University. According to which it turned out that he simply did not correctly interpret half of the signs. And so throughout the text. For example, he drew conclusions on Russian television without even looking at it, did not even look stupidly into the program. And he built his arguments on what his best friend, who lives in Russia, told him, which means a priori authority. My argument that I am also from Russia and here is the program for at least this week, but you can look at the past - not an argument. I tried to explain to him how the articles are written, although he said he knew. That the material is being collected, references are being collected, terms and special words must be checked against the dictionary, that the meaning, use and basic meaning of words can change over time, and so on. He stated that it would be too scientific. As a result, when I posted my text to him in the comments with evidence that he was wrong, he deleted it, blocked me, saying that he didn't need this one .... and that he didn't want to see me there at all. That's the whole story. The person has an official diagnosis of schizophrenia with persecution mania. The same thing, one to one, I see entering into an argument with many commentators.

[Keyser soze]

Presented at the exhibition REX 1 is able to suppress the control signals of the drone at a distance of 500 meters. And satellite navigation signals are suppressed in a radius up to 2 km. As a result, the drones completely lose their orientation in space and fall to the ground.

Suppress at a distance of 500 meters? And my, ordinary, standard, bought from Amazon DJI Mavic 2 Pro rises to a height of 6 km. And you will definitely miss 5,5 km. to crush this toy?

Good, but suppress my GPS signal. And I will scratch my turnip and switch to Altitude mode and continue to roll as I want and where I want.

I hope that the journalist got a different price for this electronic rifle, in Detmag ...

[minus]

6000 meters is the maximum height above sea level. And the real height is limited to 500 or even 120 meters. If in the first versions of the firmware it was still possible to bypass this limitation, now it is practically unrealistic. So, to deal with "household" drones, that's the thing. And the use of special and military drones is a completely different price category! And there is a solution for every threat.

[Henderson]

In short, this weapon is needed in order to protect dachas in Rublevka from journalists.

[Red_Baron]

In short, not always better. Why do you need summer cottages on Rublevka? They can be photographed even without a drone., Some can be photographed even inside and so on. Or do you want to see someone there and what are people doing? Maybe they go to the toilet, eat, drink, go for a walk, you also peep behind the neighbors, they don’t have a hidden camera in the toilet?

[Keyser soze]

The namesake .... please do not tell my stockings - https://nolimitdronez.com/
A small update of the host and you can fly your 2 Euros as high as you have enough in steel. And if I understand the author is talking about threats in Syria and Iraq and it produces the Kalashnikov concern, so it is presented as a military toy. By the way, the toy is completely in place ....

[Mestny]

You teens demonstrated the capabilities of technology - the example of a lightweight device.
The technology is designed specifically against drones that can accurately bring in ammunition.
How to hit the target from a height of 6 km. - Only developers of heavy drones know, but other means of dealing with them. Even shooting from 6 km. high resolution requires high-quality, and therefore heavy optics and equipment. Your children's plastic cameras are not suitable for this.
And of course, all young Altitudemoderams are advised to familiarize themselves with the accuracy of positioning their toys even by GPS, which is essential for combat use.

[Henderson]

Quote: Mestny

The technology is designed specifically against drones that can accurately bring in ammunition.

No wonder there is a LED flashlight attached to the trunk. He can even work at night! If you know in advance where to shine ..

[Red_Baron]

I didn’t notice that you already answered :)

[Red_Baron]

Nenene immediately the question is not what would annihilate everything around.
There is always a question of the reasonableness and sufficiency of the application. What can you do with these 6 km? How much can your quadra hang there? etc. Moreover, your Mayvik is far from the cheapest unit. As far as I understand, there is no question of confronting serious vehicles, especially military drones. Yes, even advanced civilians.
The point is that there would be a device that is convenient, compact, extremely mobile, able to protect at the right time from the attack of artisanal drones with explosives. ALL.
In general, 500 meters range for such a unit is very good. Try to discover and accompany a small object at such a range yourself. Well, for example, a bird. In most cases, you simply will not see it. You also will not see your drone at a distance of 500-1000 meters, so why then the range is higher, if there is no sense, where to direct it?
And what can a drone do from such a distance that to detonate an attached charge it is necessary to fly directly to the target, otherwise what’s the point. an explosion at such a distance will do nothing. And for the protection of large and important objects will use completely different means, as well as for detection.

[Elephant]

And if there is no clear field and the drone flies to the target as low to the earth as possible, going around obstacles, for example, through residential buildings. What is the effect of this 1HER?

[Mestny]

Old Soviet joke.
Japanese saw and men.
Put the board down.
- "Jinginnn" - said the Japanese saw
- "Oh, damn it" - said the men.
Put the log.
- "Zzzzzzzinn" - said the Japanese saw.
- "Uuuuuu, ... damn it" - said the men.
They stuck an iron pipe.
- "Krrrrrr" - said the Japanese saw.
- "Aaaaaa, damn it" - said the men.

This I understand why. And if in space? And if at a distance of 1000 km.?
And if a barrel is plugged into a shotgun with a wooden cork, will it explode? And if iron?

[Mountain shooter]

It’s still not used electromagnetic ammunition ... Because they have explosive generators on real explosives. And to apply in peacetime over buildings (and indeed ...) is fraught ... But they are. And even for small calibers. Electronics from them fade and stall. Let not for long. But that’s enough.

[Machito]

Electromagnetic pulse?

[Mestny]

It is he. Basically. in modern warfare, an excellent wunderwafer.
That's just about something small did not hear.

[Henderson]

the very thing is to disable your own radio stations and navigation systems.

[Mestny]

Well, that's just the case. when this system is unknown how, by chance, probably, it fell into the hands of drunk savages. That is, as Western ideologists say, to us.
Then of course.
Pay attention to the wording of the Western media about our new weapon - "fell into the hands", "was at the disposal." Immediately there is a feeling that drunken savages stole it from someone, and now the whole world is in danger, naturally.

[Henderson]

The electromagnetic pulse does not understand who is there in the radius of action, savages or victims of the exam. Everything is one to him, according to the laws of physics.

[Mestny]

But how does this very impulse not spread its harmful influence in all directions, but only in a certain direction? Or for example, this same malignancy acts only at a certain distance? By the laws, you know. physics.
Interestingly - our developers of such weapons thought of this? No, it cannot be. They are at random, and so come down.
Fiery physicists fiery greetings.

[Henderson]

For a certain direction, the ammunition must have the appropriate dimensions and a guidance system with a friend or foe. Good luck with real explosives and fiery greetings to theorists ..

[Mestny]

That is precisely why I wrote above that I have not seen references to such small-sized ammunition.
By the way, friend or foe is superfluous here. But these are the details.

[Henderson]

Well, why there are no small dimensions. Very much there, only they are non-directional. Tactical nuclear warheads just generate a very good EMR.

[Mcar]

Whenever I read about military news, the main thing that interests me and that they never say:
1. How many units entered the troops, how many units went on combat alert?
2. Are all components of Russian production?

[Tatar 174]

Quote: McAr

and what they never say:

why talk? The secret, you see ... The enemy does not sleep and the talker is still a find for the spy.

[Mcar]

Quote: Tatar 174

why talk? The secret, you see ... The enemy does not sleep and the talker is still a find for the spy.

Well, if so. And if otherwise? If there are just these pieces ... how to protect Liechtenstein?

Well, okay, I agree - the amount really can be a secret from the category. Although if you threaten someone, it’s not with cartoons, but with real weapons.
And the accessories? What secret can it be that it is a sophisticated electronic weapon full of domestic materials, parts, assemblies, components?
After all, a weapon! Do not rake.

[Machito]

What kind of intelligence are you working on, comrade?

[Mestny]

He forgot to ask 2 more questions - TTX, and what parts were received in what quantity.
Bad.
What do people pay money for?

[MANITU]

What kind of intelligence are you working on, comrade?

He's from Massada! Gad! I met him there on the turnstile twice! They didn't even ask him for a pass !! Says: "I am Sasha Makar". And they let him through right away! UUUUU, enemy !!! Throw him in the neck, brothers!

[Mestny]

Ahhhhh!
Exactly!
And I look - something erysipelas familiar!

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

How many units entered the troops, how many units went on combat duty?

why do you personally need this?

Are all components of Russian production?

if not everything, will it become easier for you?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

why do you personally need this?

For personal reassurance.
Exciting, you know, if something starts, it suddenly turns out that wondrous, smart, high-precision pieces are not enough.

Quote: LSA57

if not everything, will it become easier for you?

No, it’ll become much harder.
It’s difficult, you know, if anything starts, to deliver electrical circuits from behind the front line. Suddenly we bought accessories from the one with whom it will start?

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

For personal reassurance.

sleep well. battle drones do not fly over Russia.

It’s difficult, you know, if anything starts, to deliver electrical circuits from behind the front line.

will you deliver them? nothing without you?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

will you deliver them? nothing without you?

Not. You. And perish the death of the brave. And it saddens me.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Not. You.

I definitely won’t. not trained

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

I definitely won’t. not trained

Well, your brother, nephew or just a friend. But it makes me sad anyway.

[Mestny]

This is all of course wonderful, philanthropy, snot with sugar and other delights.
Are you yourself trained in what? Share it.
I’m just doing electronic military toys, in particular AI.

[Mcar]

Quote: Mestny

Are you yourself trained in what? Share it.

I didn’t want to share.

You know, there is such a breed of people - cattle. After an accidental meeting with like, you begin to love animals more than people.

So I'm sorry, I don’t know if you are going to troll or a decent person, only there will be no conversation.

[Mestny]

Well, so it is clear that it will not.
You and I are from different ages, life experiences, occupations, worldviews, and so on and so forth.
All that I tell you - you do not understand.
What is the conversation here?

[Mcar]

Quote: Mestny

We are from different ages

Well, all the more. I can’t get a conversation with youth.

[Mestny]

You won’t get a conversation with anyone. Is it with their own cockroaches in their own head?
But do not be offended - everything is ahead of you. Learn, read more different.
And then - welcome here, let's talk. I bet. Let's discuss creative and technical issues.

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

sleep well. battle drones do not fly over Russia.

And I'm not just talking about drones and weapons destroying them. In general, about any new weapons, new developments.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

In general, about any new weapons, new developments.

then it’s not at all clear if you are interested in developments, why do you need the quantity? Are you sure that they will always tell you the true amount?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

then it’s not at all clear if you are interested in developments, why do you need the quantity? Are you sure that they will always tell you the true amount?

I already answered.
To compare the territory of Russia, the capabilities of a potential enemy, the number of pieces / units entered into service and draw conclusions - is it a weapon or dust in the eyes.

Any special forces, pennants, and other PMCs may be staffed, but what if something like the Great Patriotic War? Where are the factories that will rivet these smart and high-precision pieces by tens of thousands per month? Where are hundreds of thousands of locksmiths, turners, milling machines, etc., who will spare no effort to stand at the machines?

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Any special forces, pennants, and other PMCs may be staffed, but what if something like the Great Patriotic War? Where are the factories that will rivet these smart and high-precision pieces by tens of thousands per month? Where are hundreds of thousands of locksmiths, turners, milling machines, etc., who will spare no effort to stand at the machines?

yes scope. no weapons yet, but you have such a scope

This compact product was shown at the Interpolitex-2018 International Exhibition in Moscow.

and again I repeat nobody will ever give you exact data

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

nobody will ever give you exact data

And I already agreed that the amount really can be a secret from the category. Only then should you threaten cartoons. Not solid.

And that is why "no one will ever give me exact data" on the topic whether all the components are domestic, you yourself think about it - why.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Only then should you threaten cartoons.

and what is the relationship between cartoons and quantity?

on the topic are all domestic components,

Yes, not a second it does not bother me. smart people come up and do. but from what they themselves know. and they won’t tell anyone

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

and what is the relationship between cartoons and quantity?

Such. If so threaten with real weapons, not fantasies. And so - clowning.

Quote: LSA57

Yes, not a second it does not bother me. smart people come up and do. but from what they themselves know. and they won’t tell anyone

I am happy for you - you are a calm person. And this is good.
And I am not very calm, I am worried - suddenly a hostile chip is built into the overseas component and smart and high-precision things will fail at the "H" hour.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

I am worried - suddenly a hostile chip is built into the component and smart and high-precision pieces will fail in the hour "H".

because the gunsmiths were not lucky. nobody thought about it.
Why are you on the couch at home and not in the KB? you will bring so much benefit with your "security ideas"

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

because the gunsmiths were not lucky. nobody thought about it.

Yes, no, they guess. They hoped for Russian maybe de could carry this time.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

They hoped for Russian maybe de could carry this time.

were there a case when it did not carry? and what kind of manners are smarter than others?
they create a REAL weapon, and you are pouring mud on their sofa.

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

were there a case when it did not carry? and what kind of manners are smarter than others?

And what kind of manner to blunt out of the blue?

Quote: LSA57

they create REAL weapons, and you pour mud on their sofa

This is a real Bolshevik Trotskyist bottling.
Where and whom did I pour mud on? Toadstool overeaten, or what?

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Where and whom did I pour mud on?

They hoped for Russian maybe de could carry this time.

what's this?

And what kind of manner to blunt out of the blue?

it's not me, it's you make a wise guy
no one knows that the country is big ... no one thought that the chips could be infected .. sitting on the couch provided for everything
here is your army, Generalisimo, command and do not admit "Bolsheviks of Trotskyist bottling" into your ranks, by the way, I have no idea who it is
saw the Marxists of the Leninists. they are still building communism in a single country

.

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

what's this?

Like what? It is written in Russian: they hope in Russian maybe.
Where did you see the dirt here?

Quote: LSA57

it's not me, it's you make a wise guy

I did not say that you are a wise guy, I said that you are dumb out of the blue. Troll mediocre. Behave like a small child. This is what I said.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

It is written in Russian: they hope in Russian maybe.
Where did you see the dirt here?

and this is dirt. they sweep the street at random, but not weapons
and weapons in some positions, the best in the world
maybe you won’t do that !!!

Troll mediocre.

yes i need you ...

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

and this is dirt. they sweep the street at random, but not weapons

Well, the pig sees dirt everywhere.

Quote: LSA57

and weapons in some positions, the best in the world
maybe you won’t do that !!!

Clinical cretinism!
Did I say somewhere that weapons are bad?

Quote: LSA57

yes i need you ...

So I think ... But why so many stupid messages?

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Well, the pig sees dirt everywhere.

here for self-criticism I congratulate you

Did I say somewhere that weapons are bad?

but maybe good? and from the couch you can know exactly how weapons are designed and created?

So I think.

Oh really?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

but maybe good? and from the couch you can know exactly how weapons are designed and created?

No, you cannot know this from the sofa. I don’t know. That you know nerdy. And distort my words.

I suppose that with such a dense environment of "friendly" countries, and with such a poorly developed element base in the Russian Federation, what I said above is easily possible - a hostile chip in overseas components. Even a simple GPS location can already tell a lot to a potential enemy.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

what I said above is easily possible - a hostile chip in overseas components.

Well, why did it come to your head, but there is NO SPECIALISTS ??????? where such conceit ????? and who is the most intelligent of himself writhing ?????

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

Well, why did it come to your head, but there is NO SPECIALISTS ???????

Why are you asking me about this, and not "specialists"? How can I know why it didn't come to them?

Quote: LSA57

where such conceit ????? and who is the most intelligent of himself writhing ?????

Guess you call conceit? Well, and who do you think is clever here?

And why so many question marks? I am not blind.

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

yes scope. no weapons yet, but you have such a scope

Well, we live in Russia, not some San Marino.
Russia is a very large country and has a very large border.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Russia is a very large country and has a very large border.

and you think nobody knows this except you?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

and you think nobody knows this except you?

And why then are you surprised about the scope. Small volumes are not good for us. Everything should be on a grand scale, as it was once.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Small volumes are not good for us.

I repeat. except you nobody thought about it? did not calculate?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

I repeat. except you nobody thought about it? did not calculate?

Thought of course. But I didn’t look into the head that I thought.
People have different heads. And people are all different. How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting. Or do not admit that this is possible? What - was there some kind of diamond selection of the incorruptible?
If the GRU was blown away, this does not mean that the CIA too.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

If the GRU is blown away,

rzhunemagu
what does amateur mean Yes GRU never engaged in counterintelligence

How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting.

and you decided to find out on VO?
you persecution mania does not bother? don't you suffer from spy mania?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

rzhunemagu
what does amateur mean yes GRU never engaged in counterintelligence

He laughs well who laughs at the latter. And whoever laughs well is probably a horse.
Did I say somewhere that the GRU is engaged in counterintelligence? Swollen if - sleep.

Quote: LSA57

and you decided to find out on VO?

A citizen with a mental weakness, how are you, adequate to reality?

I said that I was always interested in when new military developments are reported. But to find out something, but what is not clear, you started.

You are not doing well, citizen - from a bad mind to a healthy one.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Did I say somewhere that the GRU is engaged in counterintelligence?

How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting. Or do not admit that this is possible? What - was there some kind of diamond selection of the incorruptible?
If the GRU was blown away, this does not mean that the CIA too.

there is also memory loss ...

I said that I was always interested in

I commented on this post of yours

How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting.

learned?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

Quote: McAr
How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting. Or do not admit that this is possible? What - was there some kind of diamond selection of the incorruptible?
If the GRU was blown away, this does not mean that the CIA too.

there is also memory loss ...

And where is it that the GRU is engaged in counterintelligence?

Quote: LSA57

I commented on this post of yours
How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting.

learned?

AND? What should I find out? My comment. What's wrong? I really do not know exactly how many enemies are sitting in the Kremlin, in the Army, in the design bureau, etc.

But if you think that they are not there, then you need to treat your head.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

And where is it that the GRU is engaged in counterintelligence?

that's where dullness goes off scale.
"I am writing myself do not understand INTO"?
let's take it on the shelves

How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting.

then there are spies

If the GRU was blown away, this does not mean that the CIA too.

there is no one to catch spies, but the CIA is glad. how else to understand it?

I really do not know exactly how many enemies are sitting in the Kremlin, in the Army, in the design bureau, etc.

I say something with memory.
I quote

How do I know how many virulence in KB, but the headquarters are sitting.

Well, where is it about the Kremlin, the Army. Which KGB has long been gone?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

there is no one to catch spies, but the CIA is glad. how else to understand it?

Clear. And why didn’t they immediately explain in normal terms what exactly did they mean?

I explain. I said: the GRU was blown away, but the CIA is not, I meant that if we, Russia, are practically not carrying out subversive, intelligence, etc. activities, the CIA in this sense has not stopped for a second from the time of the USSR to this day. So imagine what it could do in the Russian Federation in almost 30 years. Despite the fact that it now feels at home with us.

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

Russia, now practically do not carry out subversive, intelligence, etc. activities,

are you a specialist in this? well, just a jack of all trades from boredom but where do the firewood come from, that we are not doing anything?

. So imagine what it could do in the Russian Federation in almost 30 years.

so say

Despite the fact that it now feels at home with us.

Inu who presents you such an info ??? then ask him

1. How many units entered the troops, how many units went on combat alert?
2. Are all components of Russian production?

Why ask at VO?

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

but where do the firewood come from, that we are not doing anything?

For thirty years, at least one of our scouts was opened by the local counterintelligence officers?
In the USSR, this happened, if not often, then regularly.
Just do not say that now our intelligence is one hundred orders of magnitude better than in the USSR.

Quote: LSA57

Why ask at VO?

Are you generally Russian or only Russian-speaking?
Why did you decide that I am asking this here?
Maybe you should not re-read the torn quote, but my whole comment about three times out loud and with an expression. Well, maybe then you understand?

Quote: McAr

Whenever I read about military news, the main thing that interests me and what they never say:
1. How many units entered the troops, how many units went on combat alert?
2. Are all components of Russian production?

[LSA57]

Quote: McAr

For thirty years, at least one of our scouts was opened by the local counterintelligence officers?

just one example. Anna Chapman and her group

In the USSR, this happened, if not often, then regularly.

and are you proud of it?

Just do not say that now our intelligence is one hundred orders of magnitude better than in the USSR.

I will say. Do you have other arguments besides blablabla?

Why did you decide that I am asking this here?

I put question marks?
or is it not a question?
You know, I'm tired of you.
the last straw was that now our scouts are not being caught and this is bad. but under the USSR they caught it and it was good.
spare me your attention

[Mcar]

Quote: LSA57

Anna Chapman and her group

Yes indeed. I completely forgot. There was such a spy who never managed to do any harm to the United States.

Quote: LSA57

and are you proud of it?

Dumb again?
What hangover did you decide that I was proud of? Why are you asking such questions?

Quote: LSA57

I will say. Do you have other arguments besides blablabla?

There are many.

Quote: LSA57

I put question marks?
or is it not a question?

So I’m not talking. Return to Patrice Lumumba cases to study.

Quote: LSA57

You know, I'm tired of you.
the last straw was that now our scouts are not being caught and this is bad. but under the USSR they caught it and it was good.
spare me your attention

Here is the insolent!
Itself stuck like a bath leaf and "spare me your attention."

[Reserve buildbat]

Maybe you immediately indicate which plants will produce, who (by name) will stand at the machines and give the exact geographical coordinates of each machine? To know in advance where to hammer? Do not tell me too.

[LSA57]

Quote: Stroibat stock

Maybe you should immediately indicate which plants will be produced, who (by name) will stand at the machines and give the exact geographical coordinates of each machine?

It seems the Cossack mishandled

[Reserve buildbat]

It is obvious
These are always noticeable utter nonsense in the comments.

[LSA57]

Quote: Stroibat stock

These are always noticeable utter nonsense in the comments.

and how much aplomb ...

[Reserve buildbat]

And you oval listen. It's raving too, but aplomb .... It can't be estimated

[LSA57]

Quote: Stroibat stock

Not measurable

well, you can give everyone an assessment
not everyone will understand that she is well-deserved

[Mestny]

He is just a few years old, but he wants to seem smart. This one is at least active, trying to give out on the topic. The rest at their age can only express themselves with slogans.

[LSA57]

Quote: Mestny

The rest at their age can only express themselves with slogans.

well here too were the slogans

Any special forces, pennants, and other PMCs may be staffed, but what if something like the Great Patriotic War? Where are the factories that will rivet these smart and high-precision pieces by tens of thousands per month? Where are hundreds of thousands of locksmiths, turners, milling machines, etc., who will spare no effort to stand at the machines?

and this is generally a masterpiece

This is a real Bolshevik Trotskyist bottling.

[Mestny]

The young man flashed a randomly learned term, of course, not understanding its meaning ... This is normal, forgiven.

[LSA57]

Quote: Mestny

This is normal, forgive.

Yes, I already forgot it.
but tired notably

[Mestny]

Well, if a decent adult is tired, maybe something is worth it.

[LSA57]

Quote: Mestny

maybe something is worth it.

mind me. let it "stand" with others

[Mestny]

In general, yes, there is nothing complicated in his reasoning. You can try to write such a bot, with such a level of discussion. Tomorrow I’ll do it.

[Red_Baron]

You just need to read with your eyes and think with your head and then there will be no superfluous.
Anyone who reads the article will not have questions that you ask.
1 - weapons made, shown at the exhibition. Who said that he was ordered to the troops and production is already being prepared. Perhaps the army has a different vision of fighting drones, or other conditions are needed. There are a bunch of weapons and other things that are being launched by factories on an initiative basis - factories work not only specifically for one customer, but also for sale in general.
2 - at this stage it is not important at all. If the product has any components that are manageable and the internal order is all the more large, then I am more than sure that everything will be done as it should. No one will ever chase after each instance and try to disable it at the right time, this will not work.
Imagine the picture. It’s some kind of Syrian airfield, everyone froze, one soldier’s one electronic gun and now it’s ready to repel the attack of 50 drones and at that moment a Chinese or another saboteur who has lain for a couple of months near the airfield in the sand presses a button and the gun refuses to shoot. Everything is lost. Just besides such a crazy moment, there can be nothing else. In all other cases, this will not be possible.

[syndicalist]

Against drones, only drones

[Ace Tambourine]

and the ray of cyborch ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: Examenatornick

Who will be at night on the street in bad weather to monitor the night sky with this gun?

Do you have only night and bad weather all year round? Then throw out the binoculars, at night and in bad weather, too, you can not see anything.

[Examenatornick]

Do you entrust the protection of the object to a person with a gun or stationary equipment?

[GTYCBJYTH2021]

Stationary equipment is good, but a man with a gun running "according to work" from STATIONARY is even better .......

[Henderson]

better yet a man with a shovel

[LSA57]

Quote: Examenatornick

Do you entrust the protection of the object to a person with a gun or stationary equipment?

Then why would the infantrymen need anti-tank grenades? because there are guns, anti-tank mines, "Kornets"

[Piramidon]

Quote: Examenatornick

Do you entrust the protection of the object to a person with a gun or stationary equipment?

As I understand it, the price does not bother you. And if this object moves - the same column on the march.

[Henderson]

The columns on the march do not attack with crafts from aliexpress. And this prodigy is no good.

[GTYCBJYTH2021]

Twelve months winter, the rest of the summer ......... from a song of the word ....... Half a year winter .... polar ...... night ..... snowstorm, snow above 3 floors ..... binoculars certainly will not help to see something, to consider .....

[Piramidon]

Quote: GTYCBJYTH2021

Twelve months winter, the rest of the summer ......... from a song of the word ....... Half a year winter .... polar ...... night ..... snowstorm, snow above 3 floors ..... binoculars certainly will not help to see something, to consider .....

Is this such a meteorological situation throughout Russia? Who told you that this device will be used only beyond the Arctic Circle? Yes, and in the Arctic there is also a polar day, when the visibility is million-per-million.

[Henderson]

REX 1 electronic gun is able to provide impenetrable drone protection

Presented at the exhibition, REX 1 is able to suppress drone control signals from a distance to 500 meters

Is this a joke or hi from Kashchenko?

[Anchonsha]

Well, and you need to send such weapons and quickly to the Donbass and Syria.

[Mestny]

Quote: McAr

Like what? It is written in Russian: they hope in Russian maybe.
Where did you see the dirt here?

I'll tell you where the dirt is.
The heirs of the ideologists of the 3rd Reich are still blowing this tune - that we, the Russians, were just lucky, the frost helped, and other circumstances, and we ourselves hoped for Russian, because the subhuman and savages are generally incapable of anything.
And now, they say, we remained the same, we hope for this mysterious chance, but we don’t do anything, just drink and steal.
Here is an honest word, I know personally, I work with some of those who REALLY work. Does the thing.
I assure you, these are very intelligent people.

[Fox]

Video about Rex-1

[Horse, people and soul]

The main thing here is not to forget to ask why this round red button is there!

[sgapich]

It seems to me, or is there much in common between the REX 1 and the air rifle MP-514K?

[Horse, people and soul]

Cheapness in production involves the use of available cheap parts.

[Red_Baron]

Not necessary. There may be the low cost of the equipment line, the low cost of using materials, the low cost of processing.

[Red_Baron]

Quote: MANITU

What kind of soldiers are you talking about? Read the post carefully. The villas of wealthy Latinos in Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia are guarded better than some military facilities))))))) If private paramilitary structures are allowed to have automatic weapons and grenade launchers, then anti-drone weapons are certainly not. These anti-drone "guns" have already appeared in the world like dirt. https://habr.com/company/coptertime/blog/405537/
(this is not all samples)

Nenene, do not pile everything together. Villas of rich Latinos, that is, the main population are protected in the same way as villas are not Latinos and not villas either. That is 2 security guards at the entrance. If you are talking about some bandits or some other rare cases, then the situation is different there. But this does not mean that any villa is a fortress :)
Private military structures - are you talking about PMCs? Only security structures have other possibilities and their activities are regulated by completely different laws.

Quote: MANITU

You are far from the topic ... The problem of drones near airports has already been raised in the world more than once.

Actually, I wrote about this, but I don’t remember you or not you. It rose and is already working, only easel, automatic. And big - not big - it’s not a question what kind of order they will order.
Regarding the fact that it is impossible to damage the aircraft remotely, you are far from the topic. There were several crashes during a plane collision when either they received incorrect data on the approach or they did not respond correctly. If they cut off the connection will be the same. Read how many planes can simultaneously at different echelons located in a major airport.