Military Review

US accused Russia of creating a space laser in orbit

83
Russia has created a space laser in orbit, which is currently ready for use, leads Daily Mail Statement by Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control Ilim Polbet.




About this Polbet warned the relevant structures in the UN. According to her, the Russian military launched into orbit a “combat laser system that is capable of disabling American satellites offline. Whether the official presented any evidence, the publication does not inform.

She stressed that these actions of Moscow are nothing more than the militarization of space.

For the US, these events are another proof that Russian military actions are not consistent with their diplomatic rhetoric, the diplomat said.

Earlier, in August, Polbet stated that the United States was concerned about the “strange behavior of the Russian inspector satellite, which was approaching in orbit with other spacecraft. This behavior "does not correspond to anything that was noted earlier," she added.

While the United States would prefer that outer space remain free from conflicts, they are forced to prepare to overcome the problems that arise there, the State Department spokesman said, noting that the US command is currently actively working to create a national space force.

Recall last summer, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation announced the launch into space of a maneuvering satellite-inspector. As noted in the military, the device has the capability of maneuvering in orbit to observe and interact with other satellites.
Photos used:
https://ru.depositphotos.com
83 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. bessmertniy
    bessmertniy 25 October 2018 10: 42
    +39
    It seems that the Americans are starting such demarches to justify the placement of their nuclear weapons in space.
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 25 October 2018 10: 49
      +22
      Quote: bessmertniy
      It seems that the Americans are starting such demarches to justify the placement of their nuclear weapons in space.


      100%


      although if you really have our laser - I like

      1. Runoway
        Runoway 25 October 2018 10: 58
        -33
        No "IF", we can't launch a rocket, what space lasers ?! From the category "you started first, that's why we are militarizing"
        1. vargo
          vargo 25 October 2018 11: 03
          +28
          Now this rocket will now poke in all places? Today, a military satellite was launched from the Plesetsk cosmodrome, and nothing, are you silent here?
          As I understand it, if the janitor does not sweep you, you say that "We can't sweep the yards, what space lasers ?!"
          Arguments, this is not yours.
          1. Runoway
            Runoway 25 October 2018 11: 36
            -14
            Do not take literally, here you’ll get tired of listing:
            -su-57 not finish
            -armata there too
            -Afar-the whole institute is still breaking their heads
            -TU-160 like Humpty Dumpty
            -all turntables in Syria without "President"
            -Kuzmich does not swim
            - Money no matter everything is expensive for us
            - "Peresvet" ground-based dark horse is generally not clear what it might, but damn it in orbit we have a "death star"
            1. Mestny
              Mestny 25 October 2018 11: 57
              +11
              It remains to cry about pensions and the people oppressed by the oligarchs.
              1. Runoway
                Runoway 25 October 2018 12: 30
                -3
                Are you happy about that? Every year more and more "fun"
                1. Shurik70
                  Shurik70 25 October 2018 13: 21
                  +4
                  Quote: bulvas
                  if you really have our laser - I like

                  Satellite inspector is not bad either soldier
            2. hrych
              hrych 25 October 2018 14: 16
              +5
              Quote: Runoway
              we will not finish the su-57

              And who is sawing it, it’s not our main one, we have such Su-35 and Su-30, and also Su-34. Su-57 is following its normal course, people are working without you ... Armata is not the topic at all, they just decided to let it into the series, or do you have everything according to pike (rather crucian) orders?
              According to AFAR, they do not rack their brains, but did the best PFAR, which in terms of performance characteristics surpass all competitors. And if PFAR is better than AFAR, why troll it here. For the fact that he called the best plane of mankind, of all times and nations, and so on. We are babbling, you old man is a completely undeveloped person. In short, America whines in a panic that our battle station with a blaster is driving in orbit, and some local (perhaps from an uncluttered hedgehog) comrade begins to whine here all the while. In this you are similar to America wassat
              1. _Ugene_
                _Ugene_ 25 October 2018 15: 23
                -17
                come on, call a spade a spade, the su-57 died safely without being born, you can say as much as you like that it wasn’t particularly necessary and what they wanted and put into the series, all this is an attempt to make a good face in a bad game
                1. hrych
                  hrych 25 October 2018 15: 40
                  +14
                  Why did he die if the pilot combat operation of the fighter began? Even in Khmeimim a couple visited. What are you carrying? What mine? What game? “Product 30” is tested. Already ten flight prototypes are flying. In short, go about your business, and do not bother to judge something that you don’t understand, discuss the pig production there, about the elite varieties of potatoes ... laughing
                  1. _Ugene_
                    _Ugene_ 3 November 2018 20: 43
                    0
                    Even in Khmeimim a couple visited. What are you carrying?
                    I hope you have better pig and potato
                    1. hrych
                      hrych 3 November 2018 20: 58
                      0
                      Only in the store I buy.
                2. MKPU-115
                  MKPU-115 25 October 2018 22: 25
                  +2
                  Quote: _Ugene_
                  come on, call a spade a spade, the su-57 died safely without being born, you can say as much as you like that it wasn’t particularly necessary and what they wanted and put into the series, all this is an attempt to make a good face in a bad game

                  Rumors of death are greatly exaggerated, especially in foreign media.
              2. Runoway
                Runoway 25 October 2018 17: 20
                -6
                Quote: hrych
                Quote: Runoway
                we will not finish the su-57


                According to AFAR, they do not rack their brains, but did the best PFAR, which in terms of performance characteristics surpass all competitors. And if PFAR is better than AFAR, why troll it here. For the fact that he called the best plane of mankind, of all times and nations, and so forth. We are babbling, you old man is a completely undeveloped person. wassat

                What SU-35,30,34 invincible remember by the 30th years, when there will be around NATO with a modified F-35 and we with 12 SU-57, at least read to what extent the Hornet fleet has been modernized and what is ours
                About PFAR where infa? From the Internet? Can you indicate how many units are installed? Or at least where is the sample? I know about the situation with production, and there, alas, as here it is customary to call "everything is lost", "liberalism"
                TU-160 did not call, but meant "and all the royal cavalry and all the king's men, they cannot assemble a hunk-dumping"
                Even here, freedom of speech, trying to persuade the minuses to the reference opinion "all the same, we are the best and we will defeat everyone," adults, but you believe in fairy tales about lasers, they have gone not far
                1. yehat
                  yehat 25 October 2018 17: 41
                  -4
                  soon we’re not going to do what the planes are, we will beg China to sell us a pair of resistors, because we don’t do anything. Oh yes, we will also ask for rice, if agricultural rates are supported at such a pace.
                  And we will ask Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan not to turn off the light and heat, because the workers from these countries remained in our housing and communal services.
                  And we will ask the Germans to buy gas at least for some reason, because this is the only source of income in the conditions of subsistence farming.

                  We are laughing at the spratostan, and who will we become soon? Will Great Karasestan?
                  1. anykin
                    anykin 26 October 2018 16: 17
                    +1
                    Quote: yehat
                    soon we
                    .
                    Oh sorry for you. Do you want to move to Russia?
                  2. Tersky
                    Tersky 27 October 2018 18: 27
                    +1
                    Quote: yehat
                    soon we’re not going to do what the planes are, we will beg China to sell us a pair of resistors, because we don’t do anything.
                    Obviously problems with the "processor" due to burnt resistors, go here, https://www.radioelementy.ru/brands/, they will select the right yes
                    Quote: yehat
                    Oh yes, we will also ask for rice, if agricultural rates are supported at such a pace.
                    And garlic and onions ... yes
                    The Russian Federation is one of the key exporters of mid-grain rice. The Russian Federation has become the main supplier of grain to the countries of the Middle East and the CIS. There is also a fairly high demand for EU rice, Russian Far East and North Africa.
                    According to official IGC data, grain shipments for export from Russia in the first 8 months of 2017 reached about 109 thousand tons (the lowest annual rate) due to a decrease in shipments to the Middle East, namely to Turkey, due to the difficult political situation between two countries. In general, in 2017, export shipments from the Russian Federation may amount to 170 thousand tons compared to 192 thousand tons a year earlier, however, according to experts' forecasts, already in 2018 the indicated indicator may increase.
                    Quote: yehat
                    And Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan we will ask not to turn off the light and heat,

                    They forgot about water and sewage, and the Internet ... tongue
                    Quote: yehat
                    And we will ask the Germans to buy gas at least for some reason, because this is the only source of income in the conditions of subsistence farming.
                    laughing Under the conditions of subsistence farming, methane is produced, well, if the Germans do not have enough methane, they will turn to you, you produce it nemeryanno. And the Germans buy propane from us, in order to then resell it to other EU countries. So who will persuade whom?
                2. hrych
                  hrych 25 October 2018 18: 27
                  +5
                  Quote: Runoway
                  What SU-35,30,34 invincible remember by the 30th years, when there will be around NATO with a modified F-35 and we with 12 SU-57, at least read to what extent the Hornet fleet has been modernized and what is ours

                  Son, the F-35 in terms of performance characteristics is very frail and our falcons are out of place, there is only hope for imaginary invisibility, and Hornet has always been a machine too frail for as long as the base of the wing, and any deck is weak in battle. I will give you the data, and you yourself think with your head. The Su-35 has a maximum speed of Mach 2,25, a practical ceiling of 20 thousand meters, a combat radius of 1000 km, a controlled thrust vector, an unbeatable PFAR Irbis with a detection range of 400 km. A Hornet, respectively, Mach 1,8, 15 thousand meters, 722 km, there is no thrust vector. F-35 max speed of Mach 1,6, ceiling 18 thousand, combat radius 1000. And we also take into service the KS-172 air-to-air missile with a range of 400 km (maximum detection of Irbis), and the R missile has long been in service -37 with a range of more than 300 km, but the American AIM-120 AMRAAM in the best modification has a range of 180 km.
                  Quote: Runoway
                  About PFAR where infa? From the Internet? Can indicate on how many units are installed?

                  PFAR Barrier on all MiG-31, PFAR Irbis on all Su-35, PFAR Bars on all Su-30
                3. MKPU-115
                  MKPU-115 25 October 2018 22: 26
                  +3
                  Quote: Runoway
                  Quote: hrych
                  Quote: Runoway
                  we will not finish the su-57


                  According to AFAR, they do not rack their brains, but did the best PFAR, which in terms of performance characteristics surpass all competitors. And if PFAR is better than AFAR, why troll it here. For the fact that he called the best plane of mankind, of all times and nations, and so forth. We are babbling, you old man is a completely undeveloped person. wassat

                  What SU-35,30,34 invincible remember by the 30th years, when there will be around NATO with a modified F-35 and we with 12 SU-57, at least read to what extent the Hornet fleet has been modernized and what is ours
                  About PFAR where infa? From the Internet? Can you indicate how many units are installed? Or at least where is the sample? I know about the situation with production, and there, alas, as here it is customary to call "everything is lost", "liberalism"
                  TU-160 did not call, but meant "and all the royal cavalry and all the king's men, they cannot assemble a hunk-dumping"
                  Even here, freedom of speech, trying to persuade the minuses to the reference opinion "all the same, we are the best and we will defeat everyone," adults, but you believe in fairy tales about lasers, they have gone not far

                  Chef, it’s all gone, they are plucking, the client is leaving.
              3. Tarhan
                Tarhan 25 October 2018 20: 44
                -4
                Su-57 goes its own way

                Why puff up. Handing out excuses. 10-15 years, the propaganda screamed Su-57, Armata, Altair. And there is nothing, and not because it is expensive, and not pulled. There are no corresponding engines, electronics, stealth technologies
                When they started to design, they hoped for Western components, like the Superjet. But after 2014, sanctions have nothing to fill gliders and hulls with, and they have refused mass production.
                Vice Prime Minister Borisov clearly stated - the Su-57, Armata, Altair will not go into the series, but here some still continue to puff their cheeks.
                1. hrych
                  hrych 25 October 2018 20: 59
                  +2
                  Well, you are wise beyond your years wassat
                  Quote: Tarkhan
                  there is nothing to fill gliders and hulls with, so they abandoned mass production

                  Filling with dung? wassat
            3. Alstorm
              Alstorm 25 October 2018 14: 22
              +3
              Not everything is as smooth as we would like. But this still does not mean that in all sectors of industry such difficulties.
              In addition, any country working with such technologies will face similar difficulties. It is important whether we can overcome them.

              And as an example, remember about the difficulties with the American F-35, Falcon rockets and much more. If this is the way to approach the issue, then America is a banana republic as a whole, unable to create anything. But this is not so. Difficulties in some issues do not interfere with their success in others.
              So it is with us.
            4. Nikolay Fedorov
              Nikolay Fedorov 25 October 2018 15: 18
              +5
              Quote: Runoway
              Do not take literally, here you’ll get tired of listing:
              -su-57 not finish
              -armata there too
              -Afar-the whole institute is still breaking their heads
              -TU-160 like Humpty Dumpty
              -all turntables in Syria without "President"
              -Kuzmich does not swim
              - Money no matter everything is expensive for us
              - "Peresvet" ground-based dark horse is generally not clear what it might, but damn it in orbit we have a "death star"

              Stop crying, whining and mumbling. This is for you, janitors, everything is simple: the broom broke, went and took a new one from the chief. And in matters of creating the best technology in the world, everything is much more complicated. But we can handle it. Do not worry.
              I don’t understand one thing. Why do you always write here "we", "with us"? You Americans (British, Jews, Ukrainians, etc.) have nothing to do with the SU-57. We, Russians, will finish it ("finish"). And you Americans will watch with envy. It was we, the Russians, who launched a satellite with a combat laser into space. And you Americans will watch with envy.
              PS There are currently no flags in the comments, so you have to determine the citizenship of the country by the nature of the comment. Your comment on the comment of the Russian person does not pull in any way. Therefore, such a conclusion.
              1. yehat
                yehat 25 October 2018 17: 47
                -2
                you went too far with nationalism.
                maybe you can even say that we are Russian su57s in every gateway and we make a real thump, and the Scots, Irish, French, Germans, Ukrainians watch Jews with envy only? What kind of nonsense? Russians have long been no longer nationality, but belonging to concepts of life in the Russian world, because there are several dozen Russian nationalities
                the same Jews are those that are russier (rusher, rusher?) most of the "Russians".
                1. Tersky
                  Tersky 27 October 2018 18: 33
                  +1
                  Quote: yehat
                  What kind of nonsense? Russians have long been no longer nationality, but belonging to concepts of life in the Russian world, because there are several dozen Russian nationalities

                  That's really nonsense ... wassat
              2. Runoway
                Runoway 25 October 2018 18: 06
                -5
                Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
                We, the Russians, will finish it ("finish").

                "Only in our country, when they ask who first flew into space, it is not Gagarin who proudly answers, but WE" ©
                -It was "YOU" that sent Oleg Peshkov's su-24 without fighter cover on a combat mission
                -It was "YOU" who put the S-300 ATS, only after the Jews covered themselves with the plane
                -It was "You" that sent the helicopters to the hot spot without "President C" and how many units and lives were lost
                - Is it "YOU" who drove Kuznetsov across half the world to show off "we still can" and sank two planes, invaluable experience in testing the cable?
                -Is it "YOU" who came to sort the militants into the SAR from the moderates, but you allow the Americans to save the rest, for this the guys died?
                .........
                You can continue indefinitely, but you don't need to talk about the laser, they didn't launch it, it's just a "test tube for entering Iraq"
                They brought it up to the point that any mention of pension, gasoline on the lunar price tags and oligarchs is considered a nagging and strongly condemned, well, be strong, then you can tighten the nuts wink
                1. MKPU-115
                  MKPU-115 25 October 2018 22: 30
                  +3
                  Delay, caring you are our foreigner. wink Russian drum
                2. Nikolay Fedorov
                  Nikolay Fedorov 26 October 2018 11: 26
                  0
                  Quote: Runoway
                  Quote: Nikolai Fedorov
                  We, the Russians, will finish it ("finish").

                  "Only in our country, when they ask who first flew into space, it is not Gagarin who proudly answers, but WE" ©
                  -It was "YOU" who sent Oleg Peshkov's su-24 without cover ...

                  Julia, pretending to be her own, but the Russophobian darling still gave out an American gut. And after this comment, all masks are reset. Enemy, outspoken convinced enemy. Why did you come to our unfriendly site? To fight informationally? Well, then a simple Russian joke about the information war with the Americans.
                  2025 year. USA. The smoking ruins of Washington. The end of the war. Dull columns of American prisoners wander the gloomy streets. Two tankers are sitting on the armor of a Russian tank, looking at the endless columns of prisoners and talking: "And yet, Kolyan, no matter what you say, we lost the information war ..."
            5. In100gram
              In100gram 25 October 2018 18: 03
              +2
              Quote: Runoway
              but damn we have a "death star" in orbit

              And who told you about this, Americans? They say a lot of things, but they do not show evidence, although they "have" it. And the fact that not everything is brought to mind, so we are still modernizing the AK and T-72. And now everything is bad? The combination of price and quality for solving specific problems is the cornerstone.
            6. NEXUS
              NEXUS 25 October 2018 19: 02
              +8
              Quote: Runoway
              -su-57 not finish

              Since the 11th year as you spoke, "sawing" the Su-57. And now take a look at how many have been sawing the Raptor, and how many have already been sawing the F-35, which gives new surprises for a long time.
              Quote: Runoway
              armata there too

              Seriously? Sorry, but who has a similar platform in the world? I’m talking about the platform, not the T-14. At the same time, the T-14 was shown in the 15 year, this year or at the beginning of the next batch for military tests, both the T-14 and the T-15 will leave for the troops. At the same time, this platform includes 26! varieties of different equipment. This is so that it dawns on you what kind of project it is.
              Quote: Runoway
              -Afar-the whole institute is still breaking their heads

              AFAR Squirrel is ALREADY standing at SU-57, while ROFAR has been undergoing work for several years.
              Quote: Runoway
              TU-160 as Humpty Dumpty

              Tu-160m1 is being completed, a new engine for TU-160М2 is already being tested.
              Tu-160M2 was transferred to flight tests

              Quote: Runoway
              -all turntables in Syria without "President"

              Since 2010, all Russian helicopters operating in "hot spots" have been mandatorily equipped with President-S complexes.

              Quote: Runoway
              "Peresvet" ground dark horse is generally unclear what it can, but damn it in orbit we have a "death star"

              Provide you with all the secret documentation on new types of weapons, dear?
              1. Runoway
                Runoway 25 October 2018 19: 31
                -3
                Quote: NEXUS
                AFAR Squirrel is ALREADY standing on SU-57, while for several years work has been ongoing on ROFAR

                Alas, nothing concrete, as always one continuous expectation, it’s sad everything is in fact
                Quote: NEXUS
                Tu-160m1 finish, the new engine for TU-160M2 is already being tested

                Glider with 0 still not done

                What is the secret information where KREP when:

                November 26, 2015 Mi-8 AMTSH-V Multipurpose helicopter of the Russian Federation-95601/252 Destroyed by SSA militants in Latakia province during a search and rescue operation at the site of the crash of Su 24M.

                July 8, 2016 Mi-35M Multipurpose helicopter Shot down by militants in the Palmyra region.
                August 1, 2016 Mi-8 AMTS Multi-purpose helicopter of the Russian Federation-95585/212 Yellow Shot down by militants in the province of Idlib.
                November 3, 2016 Mi-35M Multipurpose helicopter Destroyed by fighters from ATGMs in the province of Homs.
                December 31, 2017 Mi-24 Multi-purpose helicopter Destroyed by ATGM militants in Homs province.
                You are right a lot of work with our defense industry, a lot of premature promising announcements, when the product is still far from mass production, and then once the laser is in orbit, and yet people believe
          2. Jack
            Jack 25 October 2018 21: 26
            -1
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfshWJUWv3U
        2. feokot1982
          feokot1982 25 October 2018 11: 10
          +7
          Today the Union with Plesetsk flew away if ...
          1. yehat
            yehat 25 October 2018 11: 38
            -11
            we cannot get involved in a space race. it doesn’t matter if we have rockets or not - we cannot even make puff and armature in sane quantities. All we can do is give the dough to the Rotenbergs and Gazprom on the bridge to Sakhalin and the power of Siberia, and drain the remainder to Chubais.
            1. lazy
              lazy 25 October 2018 17: 21
              +1
              the power of siberia is bad and the north stream-2 is good?
              1. yehat
                yehat 25 October 2018 17: 34
                -1
                the northern stream has completely different payback parameters, much more profitable.
                the only plus power of Siberia is the diversification of consumers.
        3. MKPU-115
          MKPU-115 25 October 2018 22: 23
          +2
          Quote: Runoway
          No "IF", we can't launch a rocket, what space lasers ?! From the category "you started first, that's why we are militarizing"

          Can't you launch a rocket? crying
        4. Lara Croft
          Lara Croft 25 October 2018 22: 57
          0
          Quote: Runoway
          No "IF", we can't launch a rocket, what kind of space lasers ?!

          If you do not drill holes and do not need to put any sensors on the lazar, then everything will go fine ...
      2. g1washntwn
        g1washntwn 25 October 2018 13: 36
        +4
        There is a high probability that the X-37 from Boeing just does not test at all
        longevity of electronics in various temperature conditions in outer space
        and the reliability of the mechanisms of nuclear devices under conditions of long space stay. To remove it from orbit with some kind of "garbage", but look into the compartment ...
      3. alexmach
        alexmach 25 October 2018 22: 29
        0
        although if you really have our laser - I like

        Really nice.
    2. Pasha
      Pasha 25 October 2018 11: 03
      +14
      would rather decide
      then a gas station
      then the laser is in orbit ...
      or this is a leap in the development of the Russian Federation, from Obama to Trump. And what changes ... laughing
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 25 October 2018 12: 01
        -1
        Yes, everything is fine.
        In the discussion we were already excitedly explained that all this is not true. Even listing is tired.
    3. Machito
      Machito 25 October 2018 11: 52
      +3
      The Americans have already announced their intention to place nuclear weapons in orbit. As VVP said: "The loudest shouts are:" Stop the thief! "Those who have a stigma in the gun themselves." I am sure that the United States and the Russian Federation, and possibly China, are developing laser weapons for space weapons. These are the realities of Cold War 2.0.
      1. g1washntwn
        g1washntwn 25 October 2018 13: 41
        +1
        "On the basis of new physical principles" it is difficult to pull by the ears to strike weapons and, moreover, nuclear weapons in space. For the militarization of space, the United States simply acts by the same patterns as on Earth. Attempts to jump out of the INF Treaty / START from the same opera, not a single changed note.
    4. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 25 October 2018 14: 04
      0
      nobody canceled anti-satellite missiles
  2. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 25 October 2018 10: 43
    +16
    Space laser! Killer companion! The Death Star! Everything is Russian! It would be nice if that were true.
    1. Russian officer
      Russian officer 25 October 2018 10: 55
      +6
      Since 1974 of the year. KB Nidelman.
      1. sergo1914
        sergo1914 25 October 2018 10: 58
        +2
        Quote: Russian officer
        Since 1974 of the year. KB Nidelman.


        Nudelman. Alexander Emmanuilovich Nudelman.
        1. Ustant
          Ustant 25 October 2018 11: 11
          -17
          Again the great Russian scientist
          Quote: sergo1914
          Nudelman. Alexander Emmanuilovich Nudelman
          1. Dedrusav
            Dedrusav 25 October 2018 11: 34
            +16
            For the uneducated - a Soviet scientist.
          2. sergo1914
            sergo1914 25 October 2018 12: 36
            +8
            Quote: Ustant
            Again the great Russian scientist
            Quote: sergo1914
            Nudelman. Alexander Emmanuilovich Nudelman


            Constructor The brilliant organizer.
            PS I worked there after college for seven years
            PPS You would try it in his face to say ...
          3. Non liberoid Russian
            Non liberoid Russian 25 October 2018 14: 07
            0
            that you carry a caliper with you, do you measure skulls for compliance with race?
          4. MKPU-115
            MKPU-115 25 October 2018 22: 35
            +2
            Well, certainly not Israeli, he lived and worked in the USSR.
  3. denart50
    denart50 25 October 2018 10: 45
    +11
    "The United States Would Prefer Outer Space to Remain Conflict-Free"...

    Hmm ... Well, put away your own shuttle snuffbox, flying for how long? 400 days? With incomprehensible features ...
    Your X-37 Soviets is unnerving ... oh, the Russian people ...
  4. aszzz888
    aszzz888 25 October 2018 10: 52
    +2
    Polbet said the United States is concerned about the "strange behavior of the Russian inspector satellite," which was approaching in orbit with other spacecraft.

    ... and the sun began to shine brighter .... laughing
    1. vargo
      vargo 25 October 2018 11: 05
      +9
      She needs to write our capacious word of 3 letters with a laser while sunbathing on the beach: D And below in small letters "You are lying! We have no lasers!"
  5. Russian officer
    Russian officer 25 October 2018 10: 53
    +15
    Kapets we direct horror. But what about the country-gas station with a torn economy?
  6. Cycle boss
    Cycle boss 25 October 2018 10: 54
    0
    Laser?! Glanass and I don’t launch satellites normally .. and here lasers .. although if we burn their gps satellites with lasers, then our glonass will be out of competition))
    1. mvg
      mvg 25 October 2018 11: 10
      +1
      will be out of competition))

      But what about Gallileo and the Chinese Beidou?
    2. Mestny
      Mestny 25 October 2018 12: 02
      0
      Glonass doesn't work?
      Or what? How to understand this - normal satellites do not launch?
  7. Observer2014
    Observer2014 25 October 2018 10: 55
    +6
    US accused Russia of creating a space laser in orbit
    Yeah. So be afraid. We have not yet used a super anti-space weapon. "Bolt-screw" is called. bully It will sweep away everything from orbit. It’s true that only once every 200 years it will work, because it will not be able to fly because of a bunch of these screws with bolts in orbit laughing
  8. K-50
    K-50 25 October 2018 10: 58
    0
    Russia has created a space laser in orbit, which is currently ready for use

    There is? Well and good !!! yes
    And we also have Cheburashka. yes laughing
  9. thinker
    thinker 25 October 2018 11: 01
    0
    Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, Verification, and Verification of Ilim Agreements Poblet (Yleem Poblete) hi
  10. Vard
    Vard 25 October 2018 11: 16
    0
    Now they will not be able to place anything in orbit ... Those who got up earlier have slippers ... They made a hole ... and understand that the satellite stopped working ...
  11. Simon
    Simon 25 October 2018 11: 24
    +2
    Quote: Runoway
    No "IF", we can't launch a rocket, what space lasers ?! From the category "you started first, that's why we are militarizing"

    Ah what! Is the laser a weapon of militarization? It seems to me that this is a weapon of defense, that is, they can serve to destroy enemy warheads that can be aimed from outer space to our territories, but for now it can be used to eliminate space debris. request
  12. HMR333
    HMR333 25 October 2018 11: 25
    +1
    no, this is the reason for the pseudo refutation of the fact that they are screaming that they will place nuclear missiles in space! Ukrainians advised this, say that the lasers into space from the Donbass threw each casmanaut a laser pointer)))
  13. 501Legion
    501Legion 25 October 2018 11: 28
    0
    any placement of weapons in outer space should immediately mean the destruction of such an object. the problem is that you can’t distinguish a regular satellite from a combat satellite. but space should not be considered someone else's territory.
    1. Izotovp
      Izotovp 25 October 2018 11: 56
      +8
      And we do not have a combat satellite, but a satellite inspector. Any satellite can peacefully inspect: where are you going, there are seeds?
  14. Simon
    Simon 25 October 2018 11: 29
    0
    Quote: denart50
    "The United States Would Prefer Outer Space to Remain Conflict-Free"...

    Hmm ... Well, put away your own shuttle snuffbox, flying for how long? 400 days? With incomprehensible features ...
    Your X-37 Soviets is unnerving ... oh, the Russian people ...

    So, our laser will help them with this! Just try. wink laughing
  15. Ezekiel 25-17
    Ezekiel 25-17 25 October 2018 11: 39
    +2
    It's time to release the MiG 41 there.
  16. rocket757
    rocket757 25 October 2018 11: 44
    +1
    This is from what series of Bondiana ??? Why is it that someone’s assistant has been revised?
    However, and if we really do, it will be cool! However, this is still fantastic, so everything with tip-top imagination in a public access is tip-top! They would go to the scriptwriters for Hollywood ... however, can he really be soaped there?
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 25 October 2018 12: 04
      +2
      There is nothing particularly fantastic here. On the contrary - ideal conditions for the use of a laser.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 25 October 2018 12: 14
        +1
        Quote: Mestny
        ideal conditions for the use of a laser.

        No question, dust, fog, clouds are not there and the cooling is certainly good!
        Just the laser power and the power of the power plant, the dependence is direct, direct!
        And without a lot of power, this laser only let the sun bunnies. By the way, a powerful power plant is the size, weight and sophisticated automation system and others, other problems of any unattended equipment.
        No, they didn’t show, they didn’t prove that at least someone has this! The boom of evidence, the boom to discuss, but for now it's just a fantasy or nonsense, at someone it seems!
  17. Cananecat
    Cananecat 25 October 2018 11: 46
    +1
    The case when the SDI program was invented by some, but implemented by others ... laughing
  18. askort154
    askort154 25 October 2018 12: 50
    +3
    Sergey Medvedev ....Space laser! Killer companion! The Death Star! Everything is Russian! It would be nice if that were true.

    Are you relative
  19. KCA
    KCA 25 October 2018 13: 19
    +2
    Why block lasers, if the cannon-based Satellites Fighter-1 was successfully tested in space back in the 70s?
  20. true_rover
    true_rover 25 October 2018 13: 20
    +1
    Probably this laser was tested on ukrohokhlyatsk border guards, someone shines in his eyes all the time
  21. TAMBU
    TAMBU 25 October 2018 13: 52
    0
    hope it's true
  22. Jerk
    Jerk 25 October 2018 13: 53
    0
    "Accused" laughing And on what basis? Is this somehow forbidden?
  23. faterdom
    faterdom 25 October 2018 17: 44
    0
    It's not cosmic. This is a simple conventional laser. The technician forgot, he lit up when the bolts in the satellite tightened ... Musk started Tesla, so the "space electric car" came out?
  24. naidas
    naidas 25 October 2018 20: 24
    0
    - ... and also Russia thwarted the grand opening of the Wedding Palace. Then, in the ruins of a chapel ...
  25. MKPU-115
    MKPU-115 25 October 2018 22: 22
    0
    What is your evidence? Oh yes, the states and the Britons are gentlemen; the whole world believes in them.