Jacob Blumkin: poet-SR, KGB terrorist (part one)

51
Imagine that you are transported to 1921 year. The same autumn outside, but much colder than it is now. People on the streets, if not armed, then ... somehow shy. And no wonder! Here hunger, typhus, total unemployment, devastation, newspapers report about peasant uprisings ... In Ukraine, Makhno, ataman Antonov takes the city outside the city. At night, "bandit bandits" hunted around the cities. It seems that the power of the Bolsheviks is about to fall apart and the matter will end in a universal catastrophe. And what should people think in such a society, eh? It seems that only about ... to survive! But - surprisingly, in this terrible time there are people who write poetry, read poetry, and someone listens to how they are read. Although the idea is to think it would be necessary only about bread, and of how to stay alive.

Jacob Blumkin: poet-SR, KGB terrorist (part one)

Shot from the film "The Sixth of July." Blumkin and Andreev meet with Count Mirbach



Meanwhile, in Moscow, even at that time, there was a “Cafe of Poets”, where such poets as Mayakovsky, Yesenin, Mariengof were constantly hanging out, as is now fashionable to say. And there, too, was a strange man who had a reputation as a well-known terrorist and conspirator — Jacob Blumkin, a member of the Socialist-Revolutionary Party, named Live. Two no less odious characters introduced him to the poetic bohemia: Donat Cherepanov, a gangster and then an accomplice of the famous gangster Marusya Nikiforova, and the son of a book publisher and the future red commander Yuri Sablin. And Sablin himself was friends at that time with Yesenin, and the poet himself at the end of 17, even entered the fighting squad of the Social Revolutionaries. However, the Left Social Revolutionaries at that time enjoyed the sympathy of many writers and poets, among whom were Blok and Bely, and one could not even call any “little things” and “hangers-on” near the masters.

Anatoly Mariengof wrote that Blumkin was "a lyric poet, he loved poems, he loved his and others' glory." Vadim Shershenevich - another then poet described his appearance as follows: “... a man with broken teeth ... he looked around and fearfully guarded his ears for every noise, if someone stood up sharply behind him, the man immediately jumped up and put his hand in his pocket where the crook bristled. He calmed down only when he got into his corner ... Blumkin was very boastful, also cowardly, but, in general, a sweet guy ... He was big, fat, black, curly with very thick lips, always wet. Since this description refers to the 1920 year, it is easy to conclude that Blumkin at that time had mental problems. For example, when he left “Cafe of Poets” after midnight, he literally begged someone of his acquaintances to go with him to his house, that is, he clearly was afraid of a real or imaginary attempt on his life. Shershenevich wrote about it like this: “He adored the role of the victim,” and also: “... he was terribly afraid of illness, colds, drafts, flies (carriers of epidemics) and dampness on the streets.” But, however, this is only one side of his "photographs". But what will happen if we turn over another?

The fact is that no matter who he is, it turned out that his only deed in July 1918 could completely change the whole history Russia, and may even be the course of the entire First World War. That is, a man got to the bifurcation point, but that he was by that time a man, let's see ...

Like all people, Jacob Blumkin, and he is Simha-Yankel Gershev Blumkin, was born ... Born in a family that lived in Odessa, Moldavanka, and officially in 1898, but he himself asserted that in March, 1900. The workplace of his father in his biography, he also changed repeatedly, until he stopped at the option with his father - a small Jewish trader-clerk.

In 1914, he graduated from the Talmudtor (a free Jewish primary school for children from impoverished families, which was headed at that time by the famous Jewish writer - "the grandfather of Jewish literature" Mendele-Moiher-Sforim (Ya. A. Sholom)), and began to work daily bread for the sake of , replacing in the labor field is not one profession. He was also an electrician, and worked in the tram depot, and working on the stage in the theater, and at the cannery of the Avrich brothers and Israilson. At the same time, he managed to write poems, and they even published in local newspapers “Odessa sheet”, “Gudok” and the magazine “Spikes”. The atmosphere in the family was distinguished by revolutionism and polarity of judgment: the elder brother Leo held anarchist views, and Sister Rosa considered herself a Social Democrat. Moreover, both older brothers, Isai and Lev, worked as journalists in a number of Odessa newspapers, and brother Nathan became known as a playwright (alias "Bazilevsky"). There were still brothers, but there is no information about them. Well, why be surprised. Child mortality then was very high.

Blumkin himself wrote about this time in the following way: “In the conditions of Jewish provincial poverty, squeezed between national oppression and social deprivation, I grew up provided by my own children's destiny.” Well, the childhood and youth of many Odessans at that time were inextricably linked with the world of the Jap “Yaponchik” - “the king of gangsters”. As for Blumkin's first acquaintance with the revolutionary movement, it is clear that Brother Lev and Sister Rosa, of course, have tried. But the Social Democrats Yashka seemed boring and uninteresting. Well, what's the point of reading some boring pamphlets of some obscure foreigners? Whether the slogan is “Anarchy is the mother of order!” However, when he studied at a technical school in 1915 and met a group of anarchist communists, this passion was short-lived.

On the other hand, student Social Revolutionary Valery Kudelsky (also a local journalist who also wrote poetry, a friend of Kotovsky in prison, and then Mayakovsky in the “poetry shop”), in October 1917, managed to prove Blyumkin that there was no better party for the Social Revolutionaries. and she joined by joining the left wing!

A friend of Jacob since he was sixteen years old, and also a poet, Peter Zaitsev, later wrote that Blumkin at first "did not take any part in the political struggle," was always "not clean at hand ... he took part in Odessa in the dirtiest stories," including the trade in fake delays from military service.

What did Jacob do on the eve of the “Great October Revolution”? And different! According to some information, he lived at that time in Kharkov, where he worked as an agitator for the “elections to the Constituent Assembly” and in August-October 1917 of the year went to the Volga region as such.

Then, in January, 1918 of the year, Blyumkin, along with Mishka Yapadchik, took an active part in the creation in Odessa of the First Volunteer Iron Detachment from the lumpen proletariat and the sailor's machine-gun detachment. This detachment played a major role in the well-known “Odessa revolution”, and it was here that our Jacob became friends not only with Jap, but also with many leaders of the maximalist Socialist Revolutionaries: B. Cherkunov, P. Zaitsev, anarchist J. Dubman. Interestingly, Cherkunov at that time was none other than the commissar of that same sailor Zheleznyakov, and the poet Peter Zaitsev became the chief of staff of the Odessa dictator Mikhail Muravyev. Moreover, as Blumkin himself wrote about him, he took with him "many millions from Odessa." Note that Blumkin himself was constantly spinning alongside large, but shadow cash flows, that is, he correctly understood that convictions were convictions, and money — money!

There, in Odessa, he also met another man of the adventurous warehouse and for some reason he was also a poet (and the poets were not adventurers then we had, I wonder? - V.O.) —A. Erdman, who was a member of the "Union for the Defense of Homeland and Freedom" and in addition was also ... an English spy. There is an assumption that it was he, Erdman, who had just arranged Blumkin to work in ... the Cheka. Because it was like this: in April of 1918, this Erdman, under the guise of Lithuanian anarchist leader Birze, placed part of the anarchist units in Moscow under his control, while he also worked as an operational officer to collect information in the Cheka. Erdman wrote and several denunciations of Muravyov, the result of which was the work that brought the Bolsheviks to him. Obviously, he did all this in order to provoke the Bolshevik government of Moscow to the conflict with Muravyov in Odessa. Like it or not, you can only guess. Another thing is important that the friendship between Erdman and Blumkin, having begun in Odessa, was not interrupted in Moscow. And at first Erdman got into the Cheka, and then Blumkin himself!

In March, 1918 of the year became the chief of staff of the 3-th Ukrainian Soviet "Odessa" army, whose task was to stop the onset of the Austro-Hungarian troops. But there were only four thousand soldiers in it, and it is not surprising that she retreated with only one rumor about the approach of the Austro-Hungarian troops. Part of the fighters along with Blumkin on ships was evacuated ... to Feodosia, where he "for special military services" (!) Was appointed Commissar of the Military Council of the Army and Assistant Chief of Staff.

Now she has been given a new task: to detain the German, Austro-Hungarian troops and units of the Ukrainian Rada advancing on the Donbass. And now this army did not run away, but ... "sold out" to hundreds of small detachments, which, evading fighting with the occupiers, engaged in the expropriation of money from banks and the weaning of food from the peasants. Blumkin had a direct connection to this. For example, behind him was the expropriation of four million rubles from the State Bank of the town of Slavyansk. And then he offered a bribe (to hush up “this business”) to the left Social Revolutionary leader Peter Lazarev, commander of the Third Revolutionary Army. Moreover, Blumkin left part of this money for himself, and part of it - to transfer the party of the Left Social Revolutionaries to the fund!

But “sewing in a bag” is not concealed, and being under the threat of arrest, Blumkin was forced to return to the bank three and a half million rubles. But what happened to 500 thousands, is unknown. But it is known that Peter Lazarev fled from the front and even from the post of army commander after that. And archival documents show that 80 thousand rubles (the amount is also considerable for that time!) Of these four millions disappeared with him.

After that, in May 1918, Blumkin was in Moscow, but he happily escaped the court, he was not put in prison, but was made for all his "exploits" ... by a chekist! Yes, the leadership of the party of the Left Social Revolutionaries sent him to the All-Russian Extraordinary Commission of the Russian Federation as the head of the department for combating international espionage !!! And since June, he has become the head of the counterintelligence department for monitoring the protection of embassies in connection with their possible criminal activities! That is, the figure in the hierarchy of the Cheka is very, very significant. How, why, for what such merits he was put on this solely responsible post is unknown. Is that some knowledge of German?

It is interesting that in the recommendation of the Central Committee of the Left Social Revolutionaries, according to which he got into the Cheka, he was called "an expert on the disclosure of conspiracies." That's just what, when, and where he opened conspiracies? After all, he himself in his memoirs does not mention one such open conspiracy, and he probably could, couldn’t he? No, no wonder it is very correctly said - “loot wins good”. Probably, if he had not hapnul 500 thousands, but all 4 million, he would have sat in the chair of Dzerzhinsky himself. Why? Why not? In revolution everything is possible. No wonder, recalling Jacob Blumkin, Leon Trotsky once wrote: "The revolution chooses young lovers." According to him, Blumkin "had a strange career and played an even more strange role." It turns out that he was almost one of the “founding fathers” of the Cheka, and he himself became the ultimate victim of his own creation.

Meanwhile, by the summer of 1918, the party of the Left SRs numerically increased to 100 thousands of people. And this force, having the experience of the Bolsheviks before our eyes, was violently striving for power. She was supported by numerous peasantry, and it was the Social Revolutionaries who developed the tactics of terror to the utmost detail. Finally, the glory of “honest revolutionaries” was on their side. Many believed that it was the Social Revolutionaries who could correct the “distortions of October” and actually soften the “revolutionary dictatorship” of presumptuous Bolsheviks. It was a very important circumstance, on which at the same time another layered ...

Another circumstance was the arrival in Moscow 1918 in April of the diplomatic representative of Germany in Russia, Count Wilhelm von Mirbach, who was also endowed with special powers. Mirbach's task was very difficult: to keep Soviet Russia from dissolving the Brest Peace. Germany needed to get 1 million prisoners of war soldiers from camps in Siberia to replenish the army on the Western Front, then needed the Black Sea Fleet, bread, lard, leather from Ukraine, as well as steel, rolled, coal, wood, linen, foam - and all that on darmovschinka pumped out kaiser germany from soviet russia and you don’t remember. He was deservedly considered a master of political intrigue, since Mirbach managed to maintain ties even with obvious opponents of the Brest Peace. And ... in words, they scolded him, but in fact ... like Germany, everything she needed was received, and she continued to receive. The problem was the captured Germans, Austrians and Hungarians, blocked, fortunately for the Entente, by the insurgent Czechoslovakians in Siberia.

It is not known exactly how Blumkin came to the German ambassador, though perhaps through his relative, a captive Austrian army officer Robert von Mirbach, who lived in a Moscow hotel since April 1918 after his release from captivity. In the same place lived the Swedish actress M. Landstrom, who unexpectedly then committed suicide. What is the connection? Yes, no kind ... Yes, only in this kind of cases there are no accidents, and there is always some connection.

Blumkin recruited a former officer as an informant and at the same time through him negotiated with the count. About what? God only knows! Did money play any role in their relationship? Without any doubt! Who gave them to whom? Of course, Mirbach and, of course, Blumkin. But on what they went and to whom? Most likely, they were "smeared" by too radical opponents of the Brest peace. But ... those who take money from strangers should always be wary of their own. Can you imagine if Lenin learned about the reception of bribes by the Social Revolutionaries from the Germans? Like, in words you are all "against", and put in your pocket ?! It would have been such a scandal that its consequences would have hit the entire party of the Left Social Revolutionaries!

And it is not surprising that since June 1918 of the year, Blumkin and the same ever-memorable Muravyov are beginning to convince the Central Committee of the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries that they kill Mirbach and thereby provoke the start of the “revolutionary liberation war with German imperialism”, and at the same time remove “obscene” from the government "Brest Peace, that is, Lenin and his supporters!

Already 24 June 1918, the CEC of the Left Social Revolutionary Party decided that the time had come. That the ratification of the Brest peace by the Bolshevik government cannot be reconciled, and one should resort to the tactics of terror against "prominent representatives of German imperialism."

Then it was Blumkin who was called to kill Ambassador Mirbach and developed his plan, approved by the Social Revolutionary Central Committee, and the attempt itself was set for July 5 on 1918. But for some unknown reason, Jacob moved it for one day.

Interestingly, Blumkin left a farewell letter, something like a political testament, in which he wrote: “The Black Hundreds-anti-Semites have accused Jews of Germanophilism since the beginning of the war, and now they are laying responsibility on Jews for Bolshevik politics and for a separate peace with the Germans. Therefore, the protest of the Jew against the betrayal of Russia and the allies by the Bolsheviks in Brest-Litovsk is of particular importance. I, as a Jew, as a socialist, take upon myself the commission of an act that is this protest. ” The whole world should know that the “Jewish socialist” was not afraid to sacrifice his life in protest ... ”.

Everything else was a matter of technique. An official paper was printed on the letterhead of the Cheka, which supposedly Comrade Blumkin sent for talks with the German ambassador "on a matter of direct relevance to the German ambassador himself." The signature of Dzerzhinsky on the document was faked by the left SRs P. Proshyan, and V. Alexandrovich, who held the position of deputy Dzerzhinsky, “attached” the seal to the mandate and ordered to issue the car to Blumkin from the Cheka garage.

Two bombs (I wonder what type they were? And Blumkin got two revolvers at Proshian’s apartment. Nikolai Andreev went with the assistants, again well-known in Odessa and also in Moscow, and also a Black Sea sailor from the Cheka.

6 July 1918 of the year, at 14 hours, Blumkin and Andreev, leaving the sailor and driver in the car at the embassy gate, entered his building and demanded an audience with the ambassador. As the ambassador was having dinner at that time, the guests were offered to wait. Counselor of the embassy, ​​Count Bassewitz and senior adviser Rizler, came to them, but representatives of the Cheka continued to insist on a personal meeting with Count Mirbach.

As a result, Mirbach came to them all the same. Blumkin began to tell him about the arrest of his nephew, and then reached into his briefcase to get the necessary documents. However, he pulled a revolver out of his briefcase and fired first at Mirbach, and then at the two servicemen accompanying him at that time. He shot three times and ran. But Andreev noticed that Mirbach was only wounded and not killed! He threw a briefcase with bombs at his feet, but they did not explode, but simply rolled out onto the floor. Then he raised one of the bombs and threw it with force towards the victim. The explosion was followed by a deafening. In the hall flew glass.

Blumkin and Andreev jumped out the window, but since I had to jump from the second floor, Blumkin twisted his leg. The security of the embassy began to shoot and yet both terrorists managed to climb over the fence, were able to get into the car and hid in the nearest alley. Mirbach, riddled with shrapnel, died a few minutes later.

There is another version of this terrorist attack on which Blumkin, climbing over the fence, received a bullet in the buttock. And Mirbach was killed just by a sailor, and he removed Blumkin from the lattice on which he hung, catching his pants. But exactly how everything was there, is unknown. Panic, explosion, blood, shooting, everyone is running - it is very difficult to restore the truth.

To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 October 2018 06: 42
    So don’t think later that Jews are everywhere Jews again.
  2. 0
    27 October 2018 07: 55
    Terrible thing, especially when spelled out in party settings
    creepy people in a terrible time)
    ATP
  3. +1
    27 October 2018 08: 28
    Very interesting. I thought that there was a place in this article for Kotovsky.
    1. +1
      27 October 2018 08: 41
      This is of course. The material is going!
  4. 0
    27 October 2018 09: 07
    The atmosphere in the family was distinguished by revolutionary and polarity of opinions: the elder brother Leo adhered to anarchist views, and sister Rosa considered herself a Social Democrat.

    That is why this wonderful family did not work on the construction of the Trans-Siberian Railway? Together with another, no less revolutionary family from Simbirsk? Staying there forever. Humane, too humane power was!
    . And now this army did not run away, but ... "dispersed" into hundreds of small detachments, which, evading battles with the invaders, engaged in the expropriation of money from banks and the seizure of food from peasants.

    Robbery engaged.
    Germany needed to get 1 million prisoners of war from camps in Siberia to replenish the army on the Western Front, then it needed the Black Sea Fleet, bread, lard, leather from Ukraine, as well as steel, rolled metal, coal, wood, linen, foam - all thatabout Kaiser Germany from Soviet Russia pumped out a darm and don’t remember.

    And the "fighters" for "Russian statehood" - the Bolsheviks meekly supplied everything to the invaders - if only they allowed their dissenting fellow citizens - "enemies" to be destroyed ..

    The problem was captured Germans, Austrians and Hungarians, blocked, fortunately by the Entente, by rebelled Czechoslovakians in Siberia.

    Still, the Bolsheviks managed to transfer part of the prisoners to Germany, although they wanted to convey the news to a million prisoners: they fought against the .... world war (see the so-called peace decree) fool negative
    Thanks to the white people who did not allow this.
    "Now they are making the Jews responsible for the Bolshevik policy and for a separate peace with the Germans. Therefore, the protest of a Jew against the betrayal of Russia and its allies by the Bolsheviks in Brest-Litovsk is of particular importance. I, as a Jew, as a socialist, undertake the act of this protest."

    It’s with them, then it’s too late to rush about ....
    1. +4
      27 October 2018 10: 33
      "That is why this wonderful family did not have to work on the construction of the Transsib? "
      So you didn’t go for the construction of BAM for some reason, but to sunny Moldova. Stray off course?
      1. -3
        28 October 2018 06: 50
        Quote: Curious
        "That is why this wonderful family did not have to work on the construction of the Transsib?"
        So you didn’t go for the construction of BAM for some reason, but to sunny Moldova. Stray off course?

        You forgot again: I don’t communicate with swindlers.
    2. 0
      27 October 2018 13: 45
      Quote: Olgovich
      Humane, too humane power was!

      Humane ?!

      From time immemorial, people, and not only Russian, gave their rulers nicknames. Chased, to put it in modern terms. What nicknames there were! Overseas: Pepin III Short, Edmund II Iron-sided, Harold I Bunny Paw, Karl the Wise, Pedro the Cruel, Alfonso Krotkiy, Karl Mad, Richard the Lionheart ... Nasvensky: Vasily Kosoy, Vladimir Krasno Solnyshko, Yuri Dolgoruky, Ivan the Terrible, Nikolai the Bloody...

      How interesting! The future "saint" had a different nickname during his lifetime - "bloody". The people, like a girl, have a short memory. If you will, I will refresh:

      May 18, 1895 - During the coronation of Nicholas II on the Khodynsky field, more than 5000 people died in the stampede that arose due to the criminal disorder of the tsar's officials;

      May 7, 1901 - The shooting of workers at the Obukhov plant. There is no data on the number of killed and wounded, as it was: https://www.sensusnovus.ru/history/2016/05/20/23419.html;

      November 1902 - The execution of workers in Rostov. Killed - 6 wounded - 20;

      March 11, 1903 - The shooting of workers at the Zlatoust weapons factory. Killed - 60, injured - 200;

      July 14, 1903 - The shooting of striking railway workers. 10 killed and 18 wounded;

      July 23, 1903 - The shooting of a demonstration of workers in Kiev. Killed - 4, wounded - 27

      August 7, 1903 - The execution of workers in Yekaterinburg. Killed - 16, wounded - 48;

      December 13, 1904 - The execution of workers in Baku. Killed - 5, wounded - 40;

      January 9, 1905 - Bloody Sunday, the shooting of a peaceful procession of workers in St. Petersburg. Killed - 1200, wounded - more than 5000;

      January 12, 1905 - The shooting of a workers ’demonstration in Riga. Killed - 127, wounded - over 200;

      June 18, 1905 - The shooting of a demonstration in Lodz. 10 killed and 40 wounded;

      September 5, 1905 - The end of the shameful, senseless war with Japan. Russia's losses in the war - 400000 people;

      November 15, 1905 - The shooting of the cruiser Ochakov and other rebel vessels of the Black Sea Fleet. The death of thousands of sailors - Sevastopol;

      July 4, 1906 - 28 participants in the uprising of sailors in Sveaborg were sentenced to death;

      June 3, 1907 - Dispersal by the "holy" tsar of the Second Duma.

      1911 - Mass famine that claimed the lives of 300 thousand people;

      April 4, 1912 - The shooting of striking workers in the Lena goldfields. 254 people were killed;

      June 3, 1914 - The shooting of a rally of workers at the Putilov factory in St. Petersburg;

      August 10, 1915 - The shooting of a demonstration in Ivanovo-Voznesensk. Killed - 30 injured -53;

      1914 - The beginning of the imperialist war and the participation of Russia in it for the sake of European powers. During the war years, 856 Russian soldiers died, 000 ml injured. people captured - 2,8 million soldiers and officers.
      1. +2
        27 October 2018 17: 27
        It’s cool, an example for the new government - shoot the people, nothing will happen. in a hundred years we’ll coconize.
      2. -3
        28 October 2018 07: 15
        Quote: McAr
        The future "saint" during his lifetime nicknamethe other was - "bloody". The people, like a girl, have a short memory.

        Nicknames are in your prison rules. The people did not call the Emperor "bloody".
        Quote: McAr
        Killed - 10, wounded - 18;

        In just one year, from August 37 to August 38 killed about 700 000
        people
        Quote: McAr
        1914 - The beginning of the imperialist war and the participation of Russia in it for the sake of European powers. Died during the war 856 000

        This number died during the Second World War 1914 against the German invaders.

        During the usurper war against own people -Died (10) 000 000 Of their fellow citizens.
        1. 0
          28 October 2018 10: 30
          Quote: Olgovich
          Nicknames are in your prison rules. The people did not call the Emperor "bloody".

          Yeah, of course, did not call. Named.

          The price of the nickname of Nicholas II "bloody" was the royal family enamel mug filled with sausage, nuts, sweets and treats. Such a set was promised to everyone who came to the Khodynskoye field to share with the imperial family the joy of Nika's consecration to the kingdom. As eyewitnesses of those days write in their memoirs, the weather was wonderful, many people decided to spend the night on the field, so that for sure
          catch the theatrical performance and giveaways.
          As a result of the pandemonium, a stampede began, in which 1379 people were killed and more than 900 maimed (Sorry for the earlier misconception of 5000 casualties, McAr). Having canceled the festivities on this day, the tsar would not have gone down in history as Nicholas the Bloody. No mourning was announced for the dead, and the angry people christened the tsar a torturer, and the correspondent of Russkiye Vedomosti, Gilyarovsky, called his triumph "a holiday over corpses."

          But that's not all. To awaken the spirit of patriotism among the people, it was decided
          organize a small victorious war. Japan received the honorary title of the enemy. However, Russia was not prepared for a possible confrontation. As a result: the defeat in Manchuria, the Battle of Tsushima, the surrender of Port Arthur. The people blamed the king and military leaders for everything. The war with Japan and its sacrifices strengthened the nickname of Nicholas II "bloody" in the minds of the people. Why - it is possible, including that the king spared the main military leaders - Kuropatnik,
          Rozhdestvensky and Stessel. Spared the nomenclature, and peasant soldiers ... but who cares!
          The soldiers returning from the battlefield already then allowed themselves to commit atrocities with their superiors. In full swing, they threw their commanders out of the cars. The gulf between the government and the people, as well as stratification in society, intensified. A small victorious war brought the country to the threshold of revolution. It only remained to knock on the door.

          And this is not the end. The reputation of Nicholas II was finally shaken by "Bloody Sunday". Historians were divided about this event, like many others. Someone considers it a provocation, and someone - a way of expression of will. People wore petty kings for centuries, and monarchs, wanting to be closer to people, gave them a go. For example, Catherine the Great condemned the merchant-Saltychikha precisely at the request of the people.
          The list of requirements of workers dated November 5 was not classified as radical: an eight-hour working day, a minimum wage of 1 ruble, round-the-clock work in 3 shifts, and others.
          And for THIS, women and children (men were a minority) opened fire to kill. The question arises, why did they shoot people so easily under Nicholas the Bloody? Because fans of Schubert's waltzes, balls and French rolls of people, or as they then called them - vile people, were considered if not for cattle, then, as Gundyaev said, "people of the second class, barbarians, almost animals."

          So the last emperor of the Russian Empire became bloody before he even took up the duties of the tsar. And subsequently all the way he confirmed this qualification.

          Quote: Olgovich
          In just one year, from August 37 to August 38, about 700 people were killed

          That's right, but there are nuances.

          1. Not killed, but sentenced. The difference is not formal - half
          sentenced to VMN, the execution was replaced for different terms.
          2. Not a person, but criminals sentenced by courts or tribunals. They were innocent. There were also unjustifiably high punishments. There were also judicial errors. And where and when were they not? In the "stronghold of democracy" in the United States, the judges themselves admit that they make at least 5% of mistakes. US lawyers argue that there are more judicial errors - at least 15%. For example, Columbia University School of Law held
          large-scale investigation of criminal cases from 1973 to 1995. Lawyers found that two-thirds of the death sentences imposed in those years contained judicial errors. As a result, 52% of sentences were canceled in Texas and 73% in Florida. And this despite the fact that there was no civilization, no collectivization, no industrialization, nothing at all - silence as in a morgue.
          3. Among these 700 were the "victims" of the uncovered conspiracy. These "people" even then wanted to plunge the country into what their followers succeeded in the 000s.
          4. Those guilty of judicial errors were later punished approximately - up to execution. It is true that the bakers of the glass also rehabilitated these "people" as "victims of Stalinism."

          Quote: Olgovich
          This number died during the Second World War 1914 against the German invaders.

          Could die less. If not a trifle.

          By the end of the 4th century, changes were brewing in the country. The bourgeoisie wanted the abolition of the counter-reforms of Alexander III and the country's entry onto the path of capitalism. Workers lamented the reduction of their working day by 8 hours - to XNUMX. The intelligentsia wanted political freedom, and the peasants wanted land. However, having entered the throne, Nicholas II announced that everything would remain the same.
          Like that - as before. In Europe, the development of capitalism is in full swing, and we are accelerating: feudalism for all time. Almost 15 years remained before the First World War. If the emperor had begun economic reforms, solved the land problem, and had a look at the peasants (80% of the population of the Republic of Ingushetia) as people, and not as others, the First World War would have developed. Perhaps there would be no revolution. And if they were, then others. EVERYTHING would be different.

          Quote: Olgovich
          During the usurper war against their own people, 10 of their fellow citizens were killed.

          Do you mean the 300 years of the Romanov dynasty? I guess more. They are usurpers - they are not looking for ford in human blood.
        2. +3
          28 October 2018 14: 41
          Quote: Olgovich
          In just one year - from August 37 to August 38 killed about 700 000
          people

          Olgievich cannot do without manipulations; he probably forgot that if you lie in the small, then there will be no faith in the large.
          I recall the official figures, even the rehabilitation commission of A. Yakovlev confirmed them:
          In two years (January 1937 - December 1938), and not in one year as he writes, sentenced to death 681692 people but this does not mean that the sentences were carried out, many were replaced by terms.
          1. -1
            29 October 2018 16: 30
            Quote: Alexander Green
            replaced by many terms.

            How much is this for many? A lot and 5 thousand, and 40 ... How many "many" exactly?
            1. +2
              29 October 2018 22: 03
              Quote: kalibr
              How much is this for many? A lot and 5 thousand, and 40 ... How many "many" exactly?

              Do not make yourself a pedant, this is not your role.
              1. +1
                30 October 2018 13: 36
                Others can, but I can’t? Equality must be in the presentation of information!
                1. +1
                  2 November 2018 21: 20
                  Quote: kalibr
                  Others can, but I can’t? Equality must be in the presentation of information!

                  Be patient, you yourself write all the time that there can be no equality.
        3. +1
          4 November 2018 20: 35
          Quote: Olgovich
          The people did not call the Emperor "bloody".


          Our king is Mukden, our king is Tsushima,
          Our king is a bloody stain
          The stench of gunpowder and smoke
          In which the mind is dark ...
          Our king is blind misery
          Prison and whip, trial, execution,
          King of the gallows, twice as low
          What he promised, but did not dare to give.
          He is a coward, he feels with a hesitation,
          But it will be, an hour of reckoning awaits.
          Who began to reign - Khodynka,
          He will end - standing on the scaffold.

          K. Balmont "Our Tsar". 1906.
          1. +1
            4 November 2018 20: 46
            Konstantin Balmont. NIKOLAI LAST


            You're a dirty scoundrel with bloody hands
            You're a pincer, you're a punch forehead
            The executioner, sitting comfortably with the executioners,
            Under the shadow of the gallows, above the hosts of coffins.

            When will your hour come, the outcast of Nature,
            And the terrible spirit of the dungeons filled with you
            Will rise in a cloud, already growing years,
            And he will throw lightning, and thunder Fate.

            You must be executed by the hand of man
            Maybe her own, used to kill,
            You became crippled to excessive soul
            You can’t live like that, you are a vile seal.

            You defiled yourself, your country, all countries,
            What moan under your ugly heel
            You are a dwarf, you are Koschey, you are dirt, drunk with blood,
            You must be killed, you have become a misfortune for everyone.

            Nature chose you to complete
            All blasphemy of the Romanov family,
            Last abominable, creeping grip
            All the basenesses, die, your days are shameful.
      3. +1
        30 October 2018 09: 52
        Quote: McAr
        From time immemorial, people, and not only Russian, gave their rulers nicknames. Chased, to put it in modern terms. What nicknames there were! ... Pedro the Cruel, Alfonso the Mild

        Nicknames were given not only by the people, but also by the "rulers of thoughts" - chroniclers, etc. The killed monarchs (for example, the Sovereign-Martyr were especially awarded black PR hi ) from chroniclers who served their killers. From the nicknames you quoted: according to the annals, to King Pedro Cruel succeeded him brother Энрике Gracious. And according to the people - King Pedro Fair succeeded Enrique Fratricide. This is not to mention such worthy sovereigns as Mac Betad and Richard III, who William Shakespeare himself watered with mud (he, by the way, portrayed the Orleans Virgin as a bloodthirsty witch, but he turned out to have better PR people!)
    3. 0
      28 October 2018 10: 25
      "Doing robbery" is so SAFE and PROFITABLE, but fighting the regular army? "What am I bald?" ("The Elusive Avengers")
  5. +2
    27 October 2018 09: 24
    Few people know, but at the beginning of the XNUMXth century, Russia was simply swept by a wave of terrorism. The so-called "fighters against autocracy" and "bloodsuckers-usurpers" declared a real war on the existing system, killing "servants of the regime" and their "accomplices", wrongly and to the left, not forgetting to expropriate the "expropriated". In Soviet times, it was portrayed as a "fight against autocracy" by a desperate population. But if you look at the terrorists of that time, you will find that they were far from the “desperate population” —the majority were far from poor and even came from well-to-do families. In Soviet times, the main emphasis was on the fact that the so-called "revolutionaries" carried out terrorist acts against the highest dignitaries of the autocracy and it was hushed up that the highest dignitaries were just "the tip of the iceberg", the main terror was directed at those who "are easier to reach. "- ordinary officials, policemen, military men, merchants (like" miroedy "-sik), .... janitors (they were then serving in the police department), etc. And just, among these categories, the number of killed already went to thousands ... It got to the point that the police department canceled the surcharge for janitors for informative activities and took them out of the state, even allowing them to form their own trade union, otherwise, no one just wanted to go to this job, fearing to be shot by "fighters against autocracy" ...
    1. 0
      27 October 2018 12: 22
      Quote: Snail N9
      Few people know, but at the beginning of the XNUMXth century Russia was simply swept by a wave of terrorism.

      So sure, overwhelmed!

      And no wonder - 80% of the population of the Republic of Ingushetia are potential terrorists. It is incomprehensible to the mind - in just three years from 1905 to 1907, from 3 to 4 thousand noble estates were destroyed in European Russia - from 7 to 10% of their total number. It was just horror in the villages and villages where the terrorists burned the estates - all these columns, porticos, arbors, pianos and libraries. After all, they just burned, didn’t take anything for themselves, burned to the ground, as if they had burned the infection.
      The same thing happened in the seventeenth year: on an even larger scale, with great frenzy - the war was imposed, the terrorist was not needed and annoying, leaving farms without terrorists and horses, they cleaned the barns back in those years, before the surplus detachment began to rake.

      For 250 years, the ruling class kept potential terrorists in the fortress, freed thanks to the "Decree on the Liberties of the Nobility ..." from the obligation to serve and shed blood, the terrorists pulled out on their humps the Patriotic War of 1812, which did not change anything in their position, Turkish and Caucasian wars of all calibers - and they were released for another half a century after that, imposing humiliating ransoms and other conditions on this release ...

      In 1917, this dumb mass of terrorists was waiting for one thing - what happened to the land? finally give? And the Provisional Lvovs and the Kerenskys - wait a minute, we have a war here to the bitter end, parliamentarism and the Pale of Settlement, and here you are climbing, grimy ... And at the 2nd Congress of Soviets, the Bolsheviks with the Social Revolutionaries bam! - "Land for the peasants!" and that's all: the issue of support or at least non-interference has been resolved.
      And all sorts of Directory and other governments of the South of Russia answered the same thing to the question about the land: "We will defeat the Jewish Bolshevik hydra, we will gather a constituent assembly (or something else) and we will solve the GREAT QUESTION ABOUT THE EARTH."

      And you ask "How did it all happen?" With SUCH ACCELERATION. Yes, that's what happened.

      Our imprerator, though stupid, was a man, but still a durak. It was just necessary to replace the population, and tsarism would have survived to this day (not necessarily Russian, but this is the tenth thing). The current rulers immediately realized this - replacing the population, i.e. potential terrorists are in full swing. From Moscow to the outskirts, no matter what wilderness you drop into, here you are Caucasians, Asians, and Chinese - beauty! If it goes on like this, then a minority will soon become potential terrorists in the Russian Federation and the risks of terrorism will come to naught.

      Quote: Snail N9
      But if you look at the terrorists of that time, you will find

      This is what will be found, "that in time":

      Every peasant
      Soul that cloud is black
      Angry, formidable - and it would be necessary
      Thunders thunder from Ottudov,
      Blood pouring rains.
      N. Nekrasov.

      And again, the Russian has a “soul that the cloud is black”,
      And again, bitter tears flow in a stream on the chest,
      And the whole learned brotherhood will not understand until now,
      How can life improve the leanest country ever.

      Frustrated, tormented, scolded, intimidated,
      In ignorance mired, in debauchery, theft,
      The newest reforms, as well as planed,
      And disappears, drinking, in a riot, mischief.

      What will happen? Not invented! “And there will be what is appointed,”
      What are we, stupid non-Christians to think, to guess,
      If we have lost honor, if all conscience is lost,
      Boil in a cauldron and, it seems, throw firewood yourself!
      Nelen Love.
      1. 0
        30 October 2018 09: 58
        Quote: McAr
        It was just horror in the villages and villages where the terrorists burned the estates - all these columns, porticos, arbors, pianos and libraries. After all, they just burned, didn’t take anything for themselves, burned to the ground,

        The fig peasant piano or library? They land at the landowner for free I wanted to wring out! Well, he didn’t like it under the tsar-father — they received collective farm slavery:
        "Under the Tsar under Nikolashka
        there were white cakes
        and the Bolsheviks came -
        no bread, no flour! "
        Judging by the disrespectful "Nikolashka", it was not the monarchists who composed this ditty!
        1. 0
          30 October 2018 10: 53
          Quote: Tutejszy
          The fig peasant piano or library? They wanted to squeeze the landlord from the landowner for free!

          Yeah, for free! Squeeze, and then the whole community of 500 mouths sit on the hump of the unfortunate landowner.

          And about "kolkhoz slavery" to someone else screw noodles - here it will not break off.

          Inquisitive people may also be curious about collectivization:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jKXklO-75U&t=2382s
          and about the fists:
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8HIT0vWjO0

          Well, and the trolls ... where to get from them? It’s easier to imagine a summer without a mean than a popular site without trolling.
          1. -1
            30 October 2018 12: 58
            Quote: McAr
            and about fists

            I’m just wondering, where did the kulaks and the poor come from in 10 years, if in 1918 the Bolsheviks divided the land "by eaters"? There were no vouchers then - just someone plowed, and someone was lapping vodka!
            Quote: McAr
            It’s easier to imagine a summer without a mean than a popular site without trolling.

            That's it ... This is just about the red-bellied, who still don’t get tired of insulting the memory of the Holy Martyrs!
            1. 0
              30 October 2018 14: 07
              Quote: Tutejszy
              I’m just wondering, where did the kulaks and the poor come from in 10 years, if in 1918 the Bolsheviks divided the land "by eaters"? There were no vouchers then - just someone plowed, and someone was lapping vodka!

              "Where did the kulaks and the poor come from in 10 years" - so from capitalism. Or now about NEP in school do not pass? Engage in self-education. Or keep your mouth shut - you will pass for a smart one.

              And do not lie that you are "just interested." Not a damn thing people like you are not interested.
              1. -1
                30 October 2018 15: 41
                Quote: McAr
                so out of capitalism. Or now about the NEP in school do not pass?

                You clearly did not understand the question - under equal starting conditions, such a strong stratification in 10 years is possible only in the version I have described - the poor people (who received the right to decide who to dispossess!) Became mainly loafers and drunkards!
                1. 0
                  30 October 2018 16: 16
                  Quote: Tutejszy
                  with equal starting conditions, such a strong stratification in 10 years is possible only in the variant described by me - the poor people (who received the right to decide who to be dispossessed!) became mainly loafers and drunkards!

                  Do not repeat liberal myths, but rather watch a movie by the link (if the problem is with time, you can increase the speed on YouTube). If you are an adequate person, you will understand everything.

                  Where would loafers come from in the village in any significant amount?
                  There are no collective farms where there could be support for the crippled, weak, disabled, etc., yet they are ahead. What and how would these loafers live on? Elementary - so that they would eat as much as 10 years.
                  This does not mean that there were no lazy people or bad workers at all. But the village environment itself does not tolerate idleness, especially in suffering. Only in the winter months in the village there was a small razdy.

                  Where would any drunkards come from in the village in any significant amount?
                  Drinking in Russia, in the Republic of Ingushetia and in the USSR up to the 60s, and especially in the countryside, was considered a vice, condemned by the whole world. In the cities it was different, but in the countryside it was allowed to drink infrequently - on great holidays and with great sorrow.
                  This does not mean that there was no booze and drunks in the village at all. There were. But very, very little.

                  Are you asking "as with the starting ..."? Yes, easily!
                  A horse broke a leg ... Dashing people killed sons ... A woman gives birth to some girls ... A cow ate something wrong and died ... A wedge of land went on a hill and drought for three years in a row ... That's all! Where do you get to - you will go to a neighbor from whom you can grab bread or a horse. Itself could be interrupted, but how are the children?
                  Do you know what percentages were? In the spring you take two bags of grain, in the fall, from the harvest, you give four. Or even worse, you borrow seeds with a return to the can. This means give the crop half. And so there were fist usurers.
  6. +2
    27 October 2018 09: 25
    You would nevertheless, Vyacheslav Olegovich, indicate the source, in fact your colleague, only from Ukraine.
  7. 0
    27 October 2018 09: 39
    Bright and talented was a man, the finale of life is natural.
  8. 0
    27 October 2018 13: 07
    Quote: polpot
    Bright and talented was a man.


    Who, really Blyumkin? Or for you any Prox Hindey personality? laughing
  9. +1
    27 October 2018 13: 19
    “Since the beginning of the war, the Black Hundreds-anti-Semites have accused the Jews of Germanophilism, and now they are making the Jews responsible for the Bolshevik policy and for a separate peace with the Germans. Therefore, the protest of a Jew against the betrayal of Russia and its allies by the Bolsheviks in Brest-Litovsk is of particular importance "- that is, according to Blumkin, the Jews are equally purple in the fate of Russia, Germany, other countries of the Entente and the Triple Alliance laughing
  10. +2
    27 October 2018 14: 24
    This article by V. Shpakovsky, like all his previous ones about the Soviet period of our life, is also written in the style of vaudeville, and if, after reading, one wonders: "What is the article about?", then we can say with confidence: “Yes, about nothing! Some assumptions, speculation, and aphorisms such as "Salvage defeats good."

    Here are some quotes for example "

    “Obviously, he did all this in order to provoke the Bolshevik government of Moscow to a conflict with Muravyov in Odessa. Is it true or not, one can only guess ”.

    “Blumkin recruited the former officer as an informant and at the same time negotiated with him through the count. About what? God alone knows! ”

    “Did money play any role in their relationship?” Without any doubt! Who gave them to whom? Of course, Mirbach and, of course, Blumkin. But what were they going to and to whom? ”

    “And it was the sailor who killed Mirbach and he removed Blumkin from the grate, on which he hung, hooked on his pants” And here, too, according to the author: “But exactly how everything was there is unknown”.

    Why then write about it if you do not know? Pile the fiction on the fiction? So historians do not
    .
    But for the sake of “justice”, one should note the greatest dignity of the author, not as a historian, but as a writer, he is fluent in "Modern writing technology", such as copyright и rewrite. Previously, it was called plagiarism, but with a trace of the world, you look - I’ve sprinkled the article.

    In order not to be unfounded, I will give an example.

    Here is a phrase from the book of Victor Savchenko "Bear Jap and Ataman Hell: A Historical Investigation."
    “... together with Mishka Yaponchik, he takes an active part in the formation in Odessa of the 1st Volunteer Revolutionary Iron Detachment, consisting of the Lumpen Proletariat and the sailor machine-gun detachment, which“ created ”this very revolution.”

    And here is how this phrase “creatively” reworked by Shpakovsky
    “Then, in January 1918, Blyumkin, along with Mishka“ Yaponchik ”, took an active part in the creation in Odessa of the First Volunteer Iron Detachment from the Lumpen Proletariat and the sailor machine-gun detachment. This detachment played a major role in the famous “Odessa revolution”.

    One of the readers of the forum expressed the hope that Shpakovsky would also write about Grigory Kotovsky. Be sure to write, he is already “collecting” materials, because he knows that V. Savchenko also has a book about Kotovsky, and there are a lot of things in the above book about Kotovsky, because Savchenko named Kotovsky as Ataman Hellish.
    1. -3
      28 October 2018 07: 24
      Quote: Alexander Green
      And here is how this phrase “creatively” reworked by Shpakovsky
      “Then, in January 1918, Blyumkin, along with Mishka“ Yaponchik ”, took an active part in the creation in Odessa of the First Volunteer Iron Detachment from the Lumpen Proletariat and the sailor machine-gun detachment. This detachment played a major role in the famous "Odessa revolution"


      They write about the facts, it seems, because describe one event.

      Describe "creatively", for example, such an event: a kaplan shot at Lenin.
      just to make it look like nothing! lol
      1. +2
        28 October 2018 13: 41
        Quote: Olgovich
        They write about the facts, it seems, because describe one event.

        Describe "creatively", for example, such an event: a kaplan shot at Lenin.
        just to make it look like nothing!

        First, figure out what "copyright", "rewriting" and elementary plagiarism are.
    2. +2
      28 October 2018 16: 09
      Alexander, I don’t see what V.O. sinned against the truth: Simha-Yankel was a Jew; he did not have much merit before the revolution. He is liable for outright robbery. If they call me Kotovsky or S. A. Ter-Petrosyan, I can object: yes, they were involved in exs, but from the point of view of revolutionary morality, was this justified and then they put these funds in their pocket or hid their wives in stockings? Their personal courage cannot be taken away from them, but where is Blumkina?
      1. +2
        28 October 2018 19: 47
        Quote: vladcub
        Alexander, I don’t see what V.O. sinned against the truth:

        But I do not defend Blyumkin, I criticize the author for superficial articles in which there is nothing other than speculation and stones in the garden of the Soviet government, and also for the fact that he uses other people's texts in the most unscrupulous way.
  11. +2
    27 October 2018 18: 50
    Readers of the topwar may be interested to know that the prototype of Isaev-Shtirlits was ... all the same Blumkin. Yes, yes: he is c. Julian Semenov was a distant relative - nuivot.

    In general, Blyumkin is the case when it is enough to look at the photographs so that further questions would not arise.
    1. 0
      29 October 2018 13: 00
      Quote: AK64
      Readers of the topwar may be interested to know that the prototype of Isaev-Shtirlits was ... all the same Blumkin.

      Something immediately "Surrender" was recalled ...
  12. +1
    27 October 2018 19: 56
    Quote: AK64
    Readers of the topwar may be interested to know that the prototype of Isaev-Shtirlits was ... all the same Blumkin. Yes, yes: he is c. Julian Semenov was a distant relative - nuivot.


    Do you have three jerks? Standartenhfuhrer von Blyumkin, well, get it! wassat
  13. +1
    28 October 2018 10: 16
    Quote: kalibr
    This is of course. The material is going!

    V.O., I am sure that you will not be on: "a real nail to hang bunches of fantasy" (A. Dumas), but was Kirovsky really a byaka ?! I like him
    1. -2
      29 October 2018 15: 52
      Of course not. But ... it’s a pity that once I was ... a boy! It’s a pity in the sense that my mother worked with Kirov’s documents, held in his hands his letters, the letters of Stalin’s wife Aliluyeva ... her dissertation was so ... She told a lot of interesting things ... But it was in 1987. And I don’t remember anything. And then she threw away her work, counting it as garbage.
      1. 0
        29 October 2018 15: 57
        Quote: kalibr
        I was ... a boy

        Quote: kalibr
        it was in 1987. And I don't remember anything

        You are definitely not wrong with the year? winked
        1. -2
          29 October 2018 16: 24
          Of course I was mistaken - pah! in 1967, when exactly!
          1. 0
            29 October 2018 23: 26
            Quote: kalibr
            Of course I was mistaken - pah! in 1967, when exactly!

            Yes Yes! And directly the mother’s boy threw away the work! At 13 years old ?!
            Exactly, spoiled shrimps were eaten at the weekend and Dagestan cognac was this, that. As you talked about the menu yesterday.
      2. 0
        29 October 2018 23: 21
        Quote: kalibr
        Of course not. But ... it’s a pity that once I was ... a boy! ......... But it was in 1987. And I don’t remember anything. And then she threw away her work, counting it as garbage.
        They were a boy !!!!! ABALDET !!!!!! Probably went in short pants then again ??? In 1987?
        Something with memory has become. Yesterday you wrote that after 69 years you have been working for 3 years. And even earlier, that 1954gr.
        1. -3
          30 October 2018 13: 30
          The font is small, Dmitry. That's wrong. In the first case, this is 1967 year, in the second 60 years. But I think everyone understood how to. Including even you.
  14. +1
    28 October 2018 15: 52
    Who will explain to me the logic which the Bolsheviks were guided in July 1918: Popov to be shot, but there is no main instigator of the assassination attempt? The merits before the revolution, he could not boast. Perhaps because his name was: Simha-Yankel Gershev Blyumkin, the Bolsheviks had: Leiba Bronstein, Jehovah Moisha Sverdlov and others? And the raven will not bite the crow
  15. +1
    30 October 2018 10: 03
    Why did you have to illustrate the article about the young Blyumkin with a frame from a film where almost a pensioner Shalevich plays it?
  16. 0
    30 October 2018 10: 10
    Shershenevich wrote about it this way: "He adored the role of the victim," and also: "... he was terribly cowardly before diseases, colds, drafts, flies (carriers of epidemics) and dampness in the streets." But, by the way, this is only one side of his “photo card”.

    Somehow it does not fit with the fact that Denikin’s counterintelligence considered Blumkin one of the most dangerous terrorists. Shershenevich, of course, an awesome reputable witness laughing (just read the reviews of the same Pasternak about him). I wonder if he himself ever held the barrel in his hands? For example, another frequenter of the "Poets' Cafe" - NS Gumilyov hi , a man of desperate courage and courage, a gentleman of two "Georgievs" - Blumkin obviously did not consider him a coward:

    "Old tramp in Addis Ababa,
    Conquered by many tribes,
    Sent me a black spearman
    With greetings made up of many verses.
    Lieutenant, who led the gunboats
    Under the fire of enemy batteries,
    Whole night over the south sea
    He recited my verses for me.
    Man among the crowd of people
    Shot the emperor's ambassador,
    He came to shake my hand,
    Thanking you for my poetry.


    A lot of them, strong, evil and funny,
    Killing elephants and people
    Dying of thirst in the desert
    Frozen on the edge of eternal ice
    Faithful to our planet
    Strong, funny and angry
    They carry my books in their saddlebags
    They read them in a palm grove,
    Forgetting on a sinking ship ... "
  17. 0
    24 December 2018 06: 18
    Thanks to the author! Very informative!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"