Baltic mankurts

39
About forty years ago, Chingiz Aitmatov wrote the famous novel “A Day Lasts for More Than a Century” (later reprinted under the name “Buranny Station”), in which he described the cruel customs of medieval Steppe. Then the winners of the prisoners made mankurts. The prisoners were tied up, the raw skin of an animal was tied onto their heads and left under the scorching sun for a whole day. The skin dried out and shackled the heads of the unfortunate, delivering incredible flour. Most, unable to endure such torture, died. Survived units. But they lost their mind and memory, blindly and unquestioningly obeyed their master and, at his behest, committed any criminal acts. Mankurt did not even recognize his own mother and killed her at the order of his master.





Watching the events taking place today in the Baltic States (and in Poland), expressed in Russophobic hysteria, defamation of everything Russian, the demolition of monuments to Soviet soldiers and the exaltation of the Baltic SS men, involuntarily recall the steppe poor fellows who were deprived of memory and reason.

Baltic politicians who emerged in the foam of perestroika do not even realize how savage their attempts to present the evil of their countries as part of the USSR are much greater than the occupation of these countries by Nazi Germany. This is despite the fact that secret German documents, including the Ost plan, which determined the fate of the Baltic peoples in the event of Germany’s victory, were published long ago and in many sources.

Thus, in the “Memorandum” of Rosenberg, Reich Minister for the Occupied Eastern Territories, of 2 on April 1941, it was ordered to turn Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania into a “German settlement territory, designed to assimilate ... local elements ... the area, then begin to settle the Baltic States by large masses of German peasants ... it is possible that the Danes, the Norwegians, and the Dutch would be resettled to these areas, and after the victorious end of the war and the British, in one or two generations, to join this country, already completely Germanized, to the indigenous lands of Germany. ”

By the way, Himmler, pursuing the same goal, outlined a twenty-year plan, which "should include complete Germanization of Estonia and Latvia ... we should accomplish this as much as possible within 20 years."

It is noteworthy that, in line with the centuries-old European policy of Drang nach Osten, the Baltic peoples as such, in their national being and mentality, are not counted as European nations, and they should be either largely replaced by immigrants from Europe, or completely Germanized. At the same time, neither in Russia, nor even in the USSR, with its policy of internationalism, was there any purposeful policy of Russification of the Baltic peoples.

The above mentioned policy of Nazi Germany is nothing but genocide. However, the current generation of Balts spits in the direction of Russia and arranges parades of the SS. To explain this with something other than loss of memory and mind is impossible.

The fate of mancourts is sad. And let today the “Germanization” of the Baltic peoples is carried out not so much on the lands of the Baltic States proper, but in the course of the forced to survive trips to Europe’s strawberry beds (followed by the whole family), the end result of Europeanization will be the same: the loss of one’s own culture, self-identity and the extinction of these nations. As we observe in the current reality.

I think it is in the common interest to help our neighbors restore memory and turn on the mind. It would be necessary for our state and public structures to remind these neighbors more often about the fate that Europe has prepared for them in the past, and to explain the vector of their current movement.

And, of course, it is hard to point out their ingratitude and dishonesty, to demand an end to the mockery of the graves of the fallen Soviet soldiers.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    22 October 2018 06: 11
    I think it is in the common interest to help our neighbors restore memory and turn on the mind.
    ..... To restore the past, therefore recall the Soviet period, and this, according to many in the territory of the former USSR, Eastern Europe, is a complete negative ... Victory, a common victory, one by one was pulled apart by pieces ....
    1. +5
      22 October 2018 06: 21
      Victory, a common victory, one for all was pulled apart piece by piece ....

      Unfortunately, we ourselves allowed our enemies to do this ... seducing ourselves with the sweet carrot of the benefits of European civilization ...
      reality turned out to be harsher.
      1. +3
        22 October 2018 06: 23
        A foe in the head ....
        1. +5
          22 October 2018 06: 42
          Quote: parusnik
          A foe in the head ....

          "Germanization" - what a sweet word for a non-bald man! That is why they hate Russia, that 75 years ago they did not succeed in becoming Germanized.
          1. +2
            22 October 2018 11: 57
            This is not the case, for 200 years, when the Baltic states entered the Republic of Ingushetia, the authorities did nothing to Russify this region .., but on the contrary continued Germanization ..
            1. +1
              26 October 2018 20: 10
              Wow ... they didn’t ... read Beria’s orders for deportation .. only in 1949 up to 4 percent were exported from Lithuania and Latvia to Siberia. population ... You will not believe when the peoples were rehabilitated ... only in 1991. were rehabilitated ... another 15 peoples ... finally rehabilitated only in 2014 .... by Putin ... after the annexation of Crimea .... The Germans got the best of all ...
          2. +2
            22 October 2018 11: 58
            Quote: Reptiloid
            "Germanization" - what a sweet word for a non-bald man! That is why they hate Russia, that 75 years ago they did not succeed in becoming Germanized.

            The problem is that the Baltic people who want to become Germanized do not understand the main thing - the Nazis were going to Germanize not the population of the "Tribaltic extinctions", but the territory. The population was considered ordinary Untermensch and was subject to destruction and eviction. But the Baltic Nazi admirers modestly "forget" about this.
    2. +2
      22 October 2018 07: 30
      As a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union, power in the western suburbs was seized by the Nazis and their descendants, who were brought from the United States. Reasoning about * law * * law * with them is impossible. They consider themselves heirs of the SS and those who robbed and killed neighbors. In the Baltic countries, antiques and valuables are still in use that they plundered when Jews were killed under the protection of the Nazis. It should be remembered the RUSSIAN genocide that the Balts organized under the protection of the German occupiers during the * formation of independence * at the beginning of the last century. And they dragged everything they could. That is why both * flea markets * and antique shops in Poland and the Baltic countries are so rich.
      In Central Asia and Transcaucasia, there were few such Nazis and their descendants, but there were those who were in the United States who were preparing to seize power, but they didn’t have enough Nazi * leaven * for outright Nazism. But they stand in the way of the establishment of Nazi regimes, * are being corrected * under the leadership of the United States.
    3. +2
      22 October 2018 08: 48
      Quote: parusnik
      I think it is in the common interest to help our neighbors restore memory and turn on the mind.
      ..... To restore the past, therefore recall the Soviet period, and this, according to many in the territory of the former USSR, Eastern Europe, is a complete negative ... Victory, a common victory, one by one was pulled apart by pieces ....

      you must first restore order in your own country.
  2. +11
    22 October 2018 06: 32
    Mankurts are listed ... That is, the collapse of the USSR is a surge of unconsciousness? Mankurts are the unprofessional CPSU figures responsible for national politics. This is the boar Khrushchev, placing Bandera in leadership positions, giving the Russian land to the right and left. Mankurts were Soviet activists hiding the mass desertion of Western Ukrainians and the Baltic states in 41, as well as the number of people serving in various Waffen-SSs. So it’s not the unconsciousness of wine, but an attempt to interpret history one-sidedly.
    1. -2
      22 October 2018 08: 28
      Khrushchev could not give the Crimea. Then the head of government was Malenkov, and Khrushchev headed the main public organization - the CPSU and did not have such powers. hi
      1. +3
        22 October 2018 08: 30
        Quote: siberalt
        Khrushchev could not give the Crimea. Then the head of government was Malenkov, and Khrushchev headed the main public organization - the CPSU and did not have such powers. hi

        And did Malenkov cut the landman to Kazakhstan too?
        1. -1
          22 October 2018 10: 47
          Well, not only Crimea and Kazakhstan - but this uncle Stalin and the Russians arranged the land for tararams throughout Europe - we will take it from that, let us give it one. Poland, Hungary, Romania, Germany, Bulgaria - they distributed and changed so much property and land that they could not be listed. They created an artificial Ukraine, backed an artificial Yugoslavia, and what happened 70 years later? Sip this soup now and don’t complain ...
          1. +1
            22 October 2018 10: 52
            Quote: Keyser Soze
            Well, not only Crimea and Kazakhstan - but this uncle Stalin and the Russians arranged the land for tararams throughout Europe - we will take it from that, let us give it one. Poland, Hungary, Romania, Germany, Bulgaria - they distributed and changed so much property and land that they could not be listed. They created an artificial Ukraine, backed an artificial Yugoslavia, and what happened 70 years later? Sip this soup now and don’t complain ...

            And it’s a shame for the Bulgarians ... Stalin had his own reason for supporting Yugoslavia, if Bulgaria hadn’t kissed Hitler before she was 44, maybe she would have gotten her bit of land ...
            1. -2
              22 October 2018 11: 58
              Serge .... dear ....

              We don't want pieces from you. Although they took half of the country from us and gave it to Yugoslavia and Greece. You yourself have paid enough for this "land" engineering, just like Yugoslavia, God rest her soul ... so there is justice :) You just need to be cured of the skills to give and take away pieces and all you will have chiki-bunches.
              1. 0
                22 October 2018 15: 30
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                Although they took away half of the country from us and gave it to Yugoslavia and Greece.

                And what do you dislike if Bulgaria has fought a quarter and a quarter over the past century either against Russia / the USSR, or against the allies and interests of Russia / the USSR. And it was not Russia that took the land from you, but the West, beloved by Bulgaria, well, Bulgaria itself often profiled its lands in aggressive, aggressive wars against neighbors.
            2. 0
              22 October 2018 12: 18
              And only for the record - after the war, in 1946, the USSR proposed Bulgaria to enter Yugoslavia in order to leave Macedonia for itself. There was an idea about the South Slavic power. Quite foreseeably, ours showed the middle finger and sent to hell. Better to lose one province than a power.

          2. +6
            22 October 2018 12: 32
            Quote: Keyser Soze
            This land Tararam uncle Stalin and the Russians arranged throughout Europe - take from that, let us give it. Poland, Hungary, Romania, Germany, Bulgaria - they distributed and changed so much property and land that they cannot be listed. They created an artificial Ukraine, backed up an artificial Yugoslavia, and what happened 70 years later? Sip this soup now and don’t complain ...
            If in 1941 Germany and its allies Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria would not have climbed into the USSR, they would still be within the borders in which they existed. So it is not necessary for Evgeny Petrov to present the story in a way that suits you. You, too, pulled the piece of land from the neighbors to yourself !!! In 1940, with the support of Germany, they achieved the transfer of Southern Dobrudja from Romania to Bulgaria. And yet, yes, we not only saved the Baltic States from Germanization. If you plunge into history, then we and you Bulgarians saved from the Turkishization in 1877-1878. Now, at best, Yevgeny Petrov would perform namaz 5 times a day and recite suras from the Koran, and at worst he would not be able to pinch Russia through the Internet at all. his ancestors would have been massacred by the Ottomans. So don't worry about us, we are sipping our soup and gaining experience, and therefore we are not going to save anyone else. As for the Baltics, then for a quarter of a century of "freedom" under the wing of the United States and Europe, the population of these countries has decreased by 1/3. With such a rate of population decline, in another 50 years the peoples of the Baltic states can be safely attributed to the number of disappearing small peoples. You will last much longer because for the period from 1992 to 2017 i.e. during the period of friendship with Europe and the United States, your population decreased by 1437283 people (8487317 people in 1992 and 7050034 people in 2017), and according to the forecast for December 2018 it will amount to 6980000 people, which will amount to a loss of slightly more than one and a half million people. This is despite the fact that population growth from 1945 to 1992, i.e. during the period of friendship with the USSR, you had more than one and a half million people. Do you feel the difference?
            1. -1
              22 October 2018 13: 29
              If in the 1941 year Germany and its allies Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria would not climb into the USSR


              Dmitry, in fact, the Bulgarian troops never climbed into the USSR. Kindly - do not advocate. By the way, you were allies of Germany, so we are in the same kup.

              You, too, pulled a strawberry from neighbors to yourself !!!


              It was not a neighboring landowner and Bulgarian, with a Bulgarian population that lived there for about 1000 years. According to the Sanstefan treaty, between the Russian Empire and Turkey, the land entered our borders.

              If you plunge into history, then we and the Bulgarians saved you from ousting in 1877-1878


              The Bulgarians have never succumbed to Turkishization. In August, an 8-year genetic study of the Bulgarian DNA, carried out by the Florentine University "Renzi" and the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, was completed, in which it was established that 0,3% of the Bulgarian DNA was Turkic haplogroups. Otherwise, you liberated us, for which Bulgaria is the country with the largest number of monuments of the Russian Imperial Army, abroad. We are all grateful for that.

              Now, at best, Yevgeny Petrov would pray once a day 5 and recite suras from the Koran


              Dmitry, do not stick arguments and knowledge of facts with a personal attitude and assumptions. If my grandmother had eggs, then she would be my grandfather, our proverb says.

              This despite the fact that the population growth from 1945 year to 1992 year i.e. in the period of friendship with the USSR, you amounted to more than one and a half million people. Do you feel the difference?


              But in the period from 1900 year to 1944 year, when we did not have friendship with the USSR, the population we increased from 3,5 million to 6,5 million - Dmitry, do you feel the difference? Facts and I can juggle anyhow ...
              1. +1
                22 October 2018 16: 01
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                By the way, you were allies of Germany, so we are in the same kup.

                Who told you such nonsense ??? Feel free to spit in the face of this villain.
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                in fact, Bulgarian troops never climbed into the USSR.

                But it was with great pleasure that they occupied the territories of Yugoslavia, Greece, and Romania.
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                It was not the neighboring landowner and Bulgarian, with the Bulgarian population who lived there for about 1000 years.

                Ready with arms in hand to stand under the banner of Russia and shoulder to shoulder with the Russians to return the Russian lands to the Rhine and the Alps under Russian rule? No? Then do not call someone else's.
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                Under the Sanstefan Treaty

                Learn history, your favorite Western jackals forced Russia to abandon the Treaty of San Stefano and sign the Berlin Treaty. So, the Great Britain, France, Germany and the now deceased Austria-Hungary were "plucking off pieces" from Bulgaria, now so diligently kissing in the ass by the Bulgarians.
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                Bulgarians never succumbed to surrender. In August, an 8-year genetic study of Bulgarian DNA ended,

                Vzorzhamshe ... There are "non-brothers" genetically, too, almost without exception Russians, but culturally and religiously they are not Russian, not Orthodox. So the Bulgarians in a hundred years would have forgotten their history, their name and their God.
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                But in the period from 1900 to 1944, when we did not have friendship with the USSR, our population increased from 3,5 million to 6,5 million

                Do not distort, see the dynamics of fertility and mortality. And it is very even from 1900 to 1985, given that since the beginning of the 60s in Europe there has been a tendency for a significant decrease in the birth rate with an increase in life expectancy, a slight decrease in the population growth rate is explainable, but after 1992-1993 a catastrophic decrease in the birth rate occurs with an increase in mortality.
              2. +4
                22 October 2018 19: 55
                Quote: Keyser Soze
                Dmitry, do not stick arguments and knowledge of facts with a personal attitude and assumptions.

                Just facts, nothing personal. Personally, I have a good attitude to Bulgarians. I knew them back in the period when they were felling forests in the Komi Republic for Bulgaria, where they had their own completely autonomous villages. Even the train went Sofia-Koslan. I do not identify as a single whole the Bulgarian people and the Bulgarian politicians who act to the detriment of Bulgaria and by their actions damage Russian-Bulgarian relations. Honestly, I am grateful to those of your soldiers who, participating in NATO exercises, are the only ones who refused to shoot at targets painted in the colors of the Russian flag. I just do not understand what Russia has done to you personally so badly that you are trying to bite it and give advice on how to "sip soup" and "complain" to us. In our kitchen, we ourselves will figure it out, but we don't seem to go into your kitchen. And yet, yes, the minus is not mine hi
                1. +1
                  22 October 2018 20: 55
                  Yes, Dmitry does not try to bite anyone, I just defend my country from unreasonable attacks. Just a fact. And I have a good impression of the Russians, and I have enough Russian friends here in Bulgaria. We drink vodka and shout "Tagiiiiil" :) And by the way, I didn't give you a minus either. This is only left for the hurray-patriots.
      2. +2
        22 October 2018 08: 43
        Quote: siberalt
        Khrushchev headed the main public organization - the CPSU

        The CPSU was the main governing body in the USSR. You don’t know the Soviet constitution.
  3. 0
    22 October 2018 07: 34
    But the current leadership of Russia is not mankurt? The transfer of all industry and power plants to the ownership of foreign mega-corporations, and then the policy of not developing the country with the practically destruction of its population, what is this to say? The author of the article, can you first dig a log in our eyes before looking for a mote from other countries?
  4. 0
    22 October 2018 07: 45
    Yes, start propaganda that the politicians of the Baltic states, the proponents of Nazism, open a criminal case.
  5. +2
    22 October 2018 08: 29
    I think it is in the common interest to help our neighbors restore memory and turn on the mind.

    Seriously shole. Is this an offer to OUR political and other structures ???
    It would be funny if it were not so sad.
    In those who were in power, some are possessed by demons, and ours, which are engaged in anything but our common interests, sales in their very, most fantasies do not shine there anyway ... however they don’t bother!
    To whom does the author make a "proposal", what is he talking about?
  6. +1
    22 October 2018 08: 34
    Mankurt did not even recognize his mother and killed her on the orders of his master.

    I wonder why the author mentioned the mankurt hinting at the Balts? After all, the common "MAMA" was killed by a collective mankurt. “MAMA” was killed 27 years ago, but they still continue to ride on her bones, pouring slops. Look at what's going on in the Russian Federation to begin with.
  7. +8
    22 October 2018 08: 43
    Is it only the Baltic states? And kolyizurengoy? Is Masha Zakharova dreaming of installing a monument to the Nazis in Sevastopol? And fried sausages on the Eternal Flame. They say that on the outskirts the Nazis seized power. And who hung Mannerheim's board?
  8. -4
    22 October 2018 09: 50
    Spit on the Soviet Union. Blindly walk, like meat for the leader of delirium. The Baltic states fought for their territory, the Finns also fought for their territory in the Soviet-Finnish. Aw people wake up? Or the shooting of Polish officers? Blindly believe in the party uraaaaa. Yes, beyond logic. Stupidity and stupidity.
    1. 0
      22 October 2018 10: 10
      2 previous wars with the USSR, VK-1, Finnish-Estonian-Swedish cooperation suggests otherwise. Fortunately, the predator was "easy".
    2. +1
      22 October 2018 10: 11
      Suomi fought, yes, but tribal? Do not remind me when? And with whom?
      1. 0
        22 October 2018 12: 45
        Quote: Vinnibuh
        Suomi fought, yes, but tribal? Do not remind me when? And with whom?

        Vika-> The struggle for the independence of Latvia
        (1918 - 1920/XNUMX/XNUMX)
  9. BAI
    +1
    22 October 2018 10: 33
    point them out ingratitude and dishonesty, demand an end to mockery of the graves of fallen Soviet soldiers.

    How? Here the words will no longer help, you need to flog.
    1. -1
      22 October 2018 13: 45
      Quote: BAI
      point them out ingratitude and dishonesty, demand an end to mockery of the graves of fallen Soviet soldiers.

      How? Here the words will no longer help, you need to flog.

      Well, as if already flogged. Recently I talked with the Balts that they came to Shymkent to visit the monument to the deceased Balts who were exiled to us and here
  10. 0
    22 October 2018 11: 47
    [quoteSo, in the "memorandum" of Rosenberg, the Reich Minister for Occupied Eastern Territories, dated April 2, 1941, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were transformed into "the territory of German settlement, designed to assimilate ... local elements ...] [/ quote]

    We judge the Balts from our national-patriotic point of view. And they, the Balts, represent an extremely radical liberal position. That is, even then they agreed with this very "memorandum" and now the majority regrets that this did not happen. The USSR interfered. He came and "occupied" the Baltic states.
    Also, it seems to us wild that people with their native Russian language support ukronatsiks prohibiting the Russian language in Ukraine. And this is just a manifestation of an ugly perversion of liberal ideology. The goal of the liberal is to be good and free for him here and now. Family, children, clan, nation - these are absurd concepts for them and they do not care at all.
  11. +1
    22 October 2018 12: 32
    the author is very naive ...., time cannot be turned back ..., the population of the Baltic states is very civilized, German colonization has done its job since the 13th century .... 50 years of Soviet rule is nothing against the centuries of civilization ... they are not mankurts .... they remember their real masters very well ... the Russians could not replace them ..., the Russians were too soft, but they remember the strength and pain....
    1. 0
      22 October 2018 15: 20
      Quote: wooja
      time does not turn back.

      Just in case, let me remind you: these are the words repeated by political officers during the period of "developed socialism"
      1. 0
        22 October 2018 15: 24
        Pugacheva, too, sang something similar at the same time ...., this is an eternal motive .... even before the Christian ...
  12. 0
    7 November 2018 18: 20
    Everything that the author reasonably considers negative was created not by the relatively small and weak "Baltic peoples", but by the "domestic elite", which organized a counter-revolution, which the Bolsheviks dreamed of (but did not say, of course) after Stalin's death, if we seriously consider that RF is the legal successor of the USSR. Let's fulfill the goal: catch up with Portugal and everything will change.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"