Military Review

"Results": the Union State is living out its life

41
"Results": the Union State is living out its lifeMinsk has long been turned into a heavy suitcase without a handle for Moscow, which is hard to carry, but it is terribly pitiful to quit.

The mysterious country, not marked on any map of the world, is living its short century. Her name is the Union State of Russia and Belarus. The issue of dismantling a few Allied mechanisms will be raised somewhere by 2015. It is precisely at this point that it is planned to complete the formation of full-fledged executive and legislative institutions of the Eurasian Union.

According to high-ranking sources in the government, for Russia it will be a natural excuse to finally indicate to Alexander Lukashenko his place in the general ranks with Russia, Kazakhstan, and subsequently with other potential neighbors in the Common Economic Space.

Minsk has long been turned into a heavy suitcase without a handle for Moscow, which is hard to carry, but it is terribly pitiful to quit. Still would! So much effort, money and PR was spent to keep Lukashenko in the Russian gravitational field. But he, overcoming all the laws of political physics, kept trying to get out of orbit, while managing not to tear the umbilical cord through which Moscow fed him.

How much the Russian-Belarusian brotherhood has cost the domestic taxpayers has yet to be calculated. And the final figure, I suppose, will not be for wide use. Anyway, soon the allied freemen will come to an end. Belarus, immersed in the Eurasian space, in which Russia and Kazakhstan intend to establish strict rules of the game and a strict hierarchy, is unlikely to openly blackmail their neighbors, both politically and economically. After all, Lukashenko will have to deal not only with Vladimir Putin, but also with Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is also not seen in sentiment and altruism.

In the near future, the mechanisms of the Customs Union will be completely rebuilt. Further, according to Itogov, the formation of structures designed to regulate economic relations within the Eurasian Union will begin. Well, somewhere to 2015, there will be legislative and executive institutions, similar to those in Europe. It is clear that on this background the rusted Union State will order to live a natural life for a long time. However, as a joke in the polittusovka, Alexander Grigorievich roll grated. If he is destined to catch a cold politically, it is only at the Union funeral. Eurasian, probably ...
Author:
Originator:
http://www.itogi.ru
41 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Septugian
    Septugian 29 May 2012 11: 55
    +38
    You can’t leave Belarus, these are our blood brothers Slavs, these politicians always want to put us to shame, but we are a single people, we need to go back to a single Russia, and not the Gorbachev-Yeltsin division!
    1. domokl
      domokl 29 May 2012 12: 02
      +12
      The author does not call to abandon Belarus ... If you carefully read it, it becomes clear that in essence there is a natural process of re-creating the USSR in a different format and Belarus, whether it wants or does not want to, will be forced to make a choice with whom to play next ...
      The chance that we had in the creation of the union state is lost and now we really need to solve something ...
      1. Dmitriy69
        Dmitriy69 29 May 2012 12: 11
        +22
        The union state of Russia and Belarus was initially only a half measure and could not last long. It must, must grow into something more.
        1. alex-defensor
          alex-defensor 29 May 2012 15: 16
          +5
          I agree with everyone. Belarus will not give up to enemies. This will not happen, I’m sure that if reverse processes occur, it will not be difficult to bring a significant number of people to the streets ...
      2. DYMITRY
        DYMITRY 29 May 2012 12: 54
        +14
        Quote: domokl
        The author does not urge to abandon Belarus ..

        Good afternoon, Alexander.
        He doesn’t directly call, but in a roundabout way the thought throws up:
        How much Russian-Belarusian fraternity cost the Russian taxpayers, remains to be calculated

        Again calls to measure everything for money. Say good people, you look how much money goes to Belarus !!! We need it and so on!
        I don’t know about you, but such screams annoy me. Do not measure relatives with money !!!
        1. teves
          teves 29 May 2012 15: 00
          -18
          A good article, it’s a pity that a short one.
          A good example from life about the allies of Russia in the world.
          Such "happiness" in Belarus that young people flee the country as much as a column of dust laughing
          1. 755962
            755962 29 May 2012 17: 32
            +5
            It is significant that Putin will make his first foreign visit to Belarus. Not without reason.
          2. танк
            танк 30 May 2012 09: 57
            0
            Migration is natural for any country.
        2. S_mirnov
          S_mirnov 29 May 2012 18: 45
          +16
          The article is certainly disgusting. They are trying to embroil us with the only friendly state. I was there recently, all the factories and collective farms are working, there is no abandoned land. The economy in Belarus is much stronger than ours, we just have oil and gas, due to which we live richer. By the way, the locals were terribly surprised when I told that our thieves and bandits often celebrate openly in restaurants, I was immediately asked the question - "if everyone knows that these are bandits, then why are they not sitting?" Well, what is there to answer?
          1. Ascetic
            Ascetic 29 May 2012 23: 39
            +4
            Quote: S_mirnov
            The article is of course disgusting. They are trying to argue with the only friendly state. Recently I was there, all the factories and collective farms are working, there are no abandoned lands.


            I agree completely +
  2. Antarec
    Antarec 29 May 2012 11: 59
    +17
    Quote: Septugian
    You can’t leave Belarus, these are our blood brothers Slavs, these politicians always want to put us to shame, but we are a single people, we need to go back to a single Russia, and not the Gorbachev-Yeltsin division!

    I completely agree!
  3. Bek
    Bek 29 May 2012 12: 00
    +11
    Belarus is not Ukraine, Belarus is our ally.
    1. Svobodny
      Svobodny 29 May 2012 12: 14
      +10
      Beck, Ukraine is also our ally
      1. shim
        shim 29 May 2012 12: 32
        +3
        Eastern yes, and Western sleeps and sees how Russia could make worse
        1. 11Goor11
          11Goor11 29 May 2012 19: 46
          +4
          Not "all of western Ukraine", but local "talkative" activists.
          OMON will be able to solve this "problem". The bulk of the people just need a stable life.
  4. freedom
    freedom 29 May 2012 12: 02
    +6
    And what a dullness. The Eurasian Union is the next stage of development. I wonder how much time we would go to this union without an alliance with Belarus? And if the union with Belarus leaves, then this will be a natural process.
  5. Ustas
    Ustas 29 May 2012 12: 07
    +9
    for Russia, this will be a natural occasion to finally indicate to Alexander Lukashenko his place in the general ranks with Russia,

    Like, take your toys, we're not friends anymore. Like small children, the right word.
    The Republic of Belarus has its own economic policy; Lukashenko simply does not allow oligarchs (including Russian and Western ones) to plunder their state. Well, this is not like the government oligarchy.
    1. Goga
      Goga 29 May 2012 12: 18
      +8
      Ustas - A colleague, the author is from "Itogi", another "liberal" so sausage him, at least somehow opple, work out his 30 shekels ... bully
    2. Gur
      Gur 29 May 2012 13: 43
      +1
      “Be that as it may, soon the union's freedom will come to an end. Belarus, immersed in the Eurasian space, in which Russia and Kazakhstan intend to establish tough rules of the game”- So the author says so. And Lukashenka, too, began to talk about privatization, albeit with reservations. But this does not change the essence, the allied states demand to sell everything to private hands, so that everything would be like everyone else. And then, as in Peter 1 "So that he does not confuse with his understanding"
  6. Goga
    Goga 29 May 2012 12: 14
    +10
    The article "minus" - well, the "liberals" do not like it when we somehow unite - so the author sprinkles bile - the quote - "How much the Russian-Belarusian brotherhood cost the domestic taxpayers, has yet to be calculated .." - what is this about? About the fact that in the Belarusian export the share of Russian enterprises (machine-building, by the way, and not raw materials) reaches 80%? Or about that. that the transit gas transportation system of Belarus belongs to Gazprom? This "analyst" does not want to "calculate" such things? And what is the point of all this - a quote - "polittusovka" - to gloat about the termination of the bilateral union? A tripartite alliance is already visible - we are becoming stronger, which apparently infuriates these "political parties" - they "hang out" on the "dalnyak"! wassat
    1. Cadet787
      Cadet787 29 May 2012 13: 02
      +7
      I support you Igor. The article was written by a sales manager, an active participant in the "swamp", and not a patriot, calls on this article to divide peoples. But we have declassified you, enemy son. There is no other alternative than being together for the Slavic peoples.
      1. Goga
        Goga 29 May 2012 13: 11
        +5
        Kadet787 - Georgy, thanks for the support "+" drinks
        And a small addition - and not only to the Slavic ones - has not been ordered to anyone, any people, any country, preserving their own culture (and not imposed by universal human beings), I think, can join the nascent alliance for universal benefit - and Kazakhstan is a brilliant example!
        1. Marat
          Marat 29 May 2012 19: 15
          +3
          Gog completely agree with you - liberal article - hell!

          Once we all fell for the insolent lies about the USSR’s expenditures for the army and that we would become better off if we surrendered

          Now the pen and liberals (their accomplices and agents) are throwing insolent lies that the union with Belarus is supposedly unprofitable

          The leading economists of Kazakhstan in Russia and Belarus have already clearly proved that the union will bring additional benefits more than the large Kazakhstan oil field - the decision of our governments is based on pure economic benefits - everyone will win!

          But it is important to say something else - even if the union were not profitable - it would still have to unite! Because fraternal peoples should not be divided by the evil will of international aggressors - because in unity there is strength and guarantee of independence and FREEDOM! -

          Secondly, we will become the core - then other republics of the former Soviet Union will be able to join us - this is the hope of all the peoples of Eurasia for a decent and peaceful life
          1. Goga
            Goga 30 May 2012 03: 56
            +2
            Marat - Marat, ready to sign your every word! good
  7. Trudy
    Trudy 29 May 2012 12: 22
    +3
    Belarus, immersed in the Eurasian space, in which Russia and Kazakhstan intend to establish strict rules of the game and a strict hierarchy, is unlikely to be able to openly blackmail its neighbors - both politically and economically. After all, Lukashenko will have to deal not only with Vladimir Putin, but also with Nursultan Nazarbayev, who is also not seen in sentiment and altruism.


    And here is another member of the EurAsEC:

    Syria took a step at EurAsEC


    Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov's statement that President Bashar al-Assad is "not a friend or ally of Russia" was a sly diplomatic move. This is evidenced by the agreement reached in Moscow on the creation of a free trade zone between the Customs Union (Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus) and Syria. This is a clear indication of allied positions and the first step towards the integration of Syria into the structures of a single economic space and the Eurasian Union.

    Here: http://www.warandpeace.ru/ru/news/view/69814/
    1. shim
      shim 29 May 2012 12: 34
      0
      Now, if Syria, Iran were taken to the SCO, then I think that not some Americans would have climbed them
  8. bubla5
    bubla5 29 May 2012 12: 43
    -2
    Slowly they are preparing an opinion that soon Belarusians will be allowed to freely sail, we will not pick up the others, and Europe will be closer, and then give Bryansk, etc.
  9. Opertak
    Opertak 29 May 2012 12: 51
    +12
    The article is frankly stupid, wrecking and thoroughly false.
    1. Belarus is the only REAL ally of Russia.
    2. From an economic point of view, Russia should Belarus, and not vice versa - it is easy to verify.
    3. When they began to put the "Volga" radar station on experimental alert duty in 2000, there were no air defense means in all of Russia to cover it. The Belarusian Commanders of the services of the Armed Forces were against, but Lukashenka by OWN decision withdrew air defense forces and means from his western border and covered our station.
    4. When everything was stolen under Yeltsin and Russia owed Belarus $ 200 for electricity, Lukashenko HAS FORBIDDEN to disconnect our military power supply facilities, otherwise our nuclear submarine missile carriers would have remained WITHOUT communication, i.e. would be locked in the bases
    1. Goga
      Goga 29 May 2012 13: 05
      +5
      OperTak - that's right, Vladimir, "+" and I am about the same a little higher. And the author is just one of those "cadres" who are ready to salivate, but it will not work to ensure that Russia is completely alone - an X R E N them! angry
      1. Opertak
        Opertak 29 May 2012 13: 09
        +3
        Quote: Gogh
        en X R E N them, will not work!
        +1000! :))
  10. gleb49
    gleb49 29 May 2012 12: 54
    +1
    It's a shame that our people decide how to live in bathhouses and the State Department.
  11. Alexei
    Alexei 29 May 2012 13: 03
    +4
    Maybe the union is still problematic ... And someone thought that everything would be simple? There is nothing to ponder. They are ours, we are theirs; break through.
  12. Liberal
    Liberal 29 May 2012 13: 10
    -1
    Why do we need a "union state" when the mighty Eurasian Union is on the horizon? Th you can not trust Putin ?! Swamp trash and other agents of the Washington regional committee can reach such abominations of the current. Go Russia!!
    1. Goga
      Goga 29 May 2012 13: 16
      +1
      Liberal - And sho Mach, at least once in my life I wrote something sensible - and in truth - a quote - "Russia forward !!" - so you look even a man will come out of you! bully
  13. AK-74-1
    AK-74-1 29 May 2012 13: 34
    +1
    The article is worth reading. The rating is absolutely neutral. There are pluses and minuses. The author just needs to stop fooling the people about the fact that the state lives only at the expense of taxes, or this is an ugly way to sow discord among the Russian people. The reunification of the territory of the Russian Federation and the Belarusian Republic into a single Russian state naturally led to the restoration of Russia as a civilization state. EurAsEC with the participation of Kazakhstan further advancement along this path. We are waiting for Ukraine.
  14. jo_lik
    jo_lik 29 May 2012 13: 44
    +6
    Quit - you don’t have much mind, but how then to find it?
  15. vladimir64ss
    vladimir64ss 29 May 2012 15: 10
    +3
    The cost of the Russian-Belarusian fraternity to domestic taxpayers remains to be calculated .----------- The author has a moral problem. It looks like a bit of liberalism.
    1. 11Goor11
      11Goor11 29 May 2012 19: 55
      0
      Absolutely right! If we continue the author’s thought, it turns out:
      "Will my children be able to justify the funds invested in them? They will not be able to! To the street!"
      "Will decrepit parents be able to justify the means for their maintenance? ..."
      If you start to measure everything with money and momentary benefits ... kapets.
  16. awg75
    awg75 29 May 2012 15: 38
    0
    We have no brotherly peoples, but the leadership is completely different. Who knows what will come to mind the SUN-LIKE and the LUNOIK Lukoshenko tomorrow. Mania of greatness is not treated. Spring or autumn aggravation ---- opa and his friends are already in America, China or in the jungle of the Amazon, and their asses are wiped with treaties with Russia.
    1. Odinplys
      Odinplys 29 May 2012 20: 19
      0
      awg75,
      Lukashenko was the only ... then not yet president ... who voted ... against the collapse of the USSR ... honor and praise be for him ...

      Quote: awg75
      And with agreements with Russia, the ass is torn.


      He already answered one German ... liberalist ... it is better to be a dictator than a cabbage roll ... As for the agreements ... I think Lukashenko will first offer you to sit on a hedgehog ... and looking at your pleasure ... he himself smiles from such a gesture refuse ...
      We are one people ... and that says it all ...
  17. Idunavs
    Idunavs 29 May 2012 16: 07
    +1
    I want to believe all the same that we all (bl, Ukrainian and Russia) will unite. A third of the country has relatives there and there, it's like taking and tearing the family apart.
  18. Vadim555
    Vadim555 29 May 2012 16: 20
    +6
    Open appeal to the Administration.

    I ask you to delete (ban) my account.
    Three appeals to the admin in PM with this request,
    were rejected by him.
    I would like to "disperse" beautifully, but it does not work.
    I have no choice but to go-
    In the "campaign" for the "eternal" ban, typing 10 warnings, posting
    this appeal in different forum threads.

    4 warning - ban for two days;
    7 warnings - ban on 10 days;
    9 warnings - ban on 30 days;
    10 warnings - an eternal ban.
    1. PSih2097
      PSih2097 29 May 2012 21: 29
      +1
      Vadim555,
      You look, you’ll reach the Marshal, but he just asked me to - BAN ... laughing
  19. ded
    ded 29 May 2012 16: 23
    0
    Eastern yes, and Western sleeps and sees how Russia could make worse

    I do not agree. Belarus is a small country and there is no big difference in mood in different areas
  20. escobar
    escobar 29 May 2012 16: 38
    0
    Let them enter the federation and the point, stop MUMU EB @ TB.
  21. Samsebenaum
    Samsebenaum 29 May 2012 17: 08
    +4
    No, not a suitcase without a handle, Belarus. So you can not apply to brothers - Slavs.
    And you also need to help them and rejoice when they get better than ours, and not dairy ones to arrange wars. I don’t think that a lot of money from Russia goes to Belarus in vain.
    Our greedy, easily and quickly got rich on the people's good nouveau riche, crush for a penny. And the Old Man needs to be touched less. Take a ride in the Smolensk region, then rush to Belarus, and then compare ... There is a Boss! This can be seen right away ...
    People are still living there poorly, not to fat. Between two millstones are clamped - the European Union and Russia. Old Man is spinning as he can. Equally dangerous for Belarus, both one and the other.
    And I don’t want to be glad that the fragile, some kind of painful, underdeveloped union of Russia and Belarus will die. What will replace him? What awaits us ahead?
  22. ded
    ded 29 May 2012 17: 20
    0
    The article is frankly stupid, wrecking and thoroughly false.

    Well, why are you so?
    3. When they began to put the "Volga" radar station on experimental alert duty in 2000, there were no air defense means in all of Russia to cover it. The Belarusian Commanders of the services of the Armed Forces were against, but Lukashenka by OWN decision withdrew air defense forces and means from his western border and covered our station.
    4. When everything was stolen under Yeltsin and Russia owed Belarus $ 200 for electricity, Lukashenko HAS FORBIDDEN to disconnect our military power supply facilities, otherwise our nuclear submarine missile carriers would have remained WITHOUT communication, i.e. would be locked in the bases

    What I don’t know, I don’t know.
    1. Belarus is the only REAL ally of Russia.

    1. Kyrgyz President Bakiyev robbed Russia from head to toe and promised in exchange for loans to close the NATO airbase but never did (who came to power by overthrowing Russian-minded President Akayev) is now hiding in Belarus
    2. Lukashenko never recognized the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia (although, according to D. Medvedev, he promised it), moreover, immediately after the end of hostilities by the Belarusian Foreign Ministry, it was announced that citizens of the Republic of Belarus should enter Abkhazia and South Ossetia to the territory of these countries exclusively from Georgia and under Georgian laws.
    2. From an economic point of view, Russia should Belarus, and not vice versa - it is easy to verify.

    Well, there’s nothing to comment on at all. As the saying goes: Insanity grew stronger!
    For 2006 or 2008, I don’t remember exactly, according to the Accounts Chamber of Russia, Belarus received about $ 60 billion over the years of its independence for nothing at all (these were various loans that were then half written off, as well as the supply of oil products at repeatedly low prices) in exchange for this Lukashenko promised to unite Russia and Belarus (to make not a UNION state, but a ONE state.)
    1. Odinplys
      Odinplys 29 May 2012 20: 40
      0
      ded,
      CIS ... a single customs and economic space ... a single ruble ... and it will come to a single state ...
      Breaking does not build ...
      And Lukashenko ... this is the most reliable foundation of the Slavic Peoples ...
  23. Svyatoslav
    Svyatoslav 29 May 2012 18: 33
    +2
    Without Russia, there is no Belarus, without Belarus there is no Russia.
  24. nycsson
    nycsson 29 May 2012 19: 53
    -1
    The article sucks !!!
  25. 12Ural12
    12Ural12 29 May 2012 23: 30
    0
    The article is provocative. No matter how much Belarus does good for Russia, no one does.
  26. Vlaleks48
    Vlaleks48 30 May 2012 10: 49
    0
    Plus, but only "daddy"! With all the pressure that the liberal movement suits Belarus, Lukashenka maintains order in the country.
    The official does not breed, as we do not steal. Moreover, for our freedom-loving kleptocratic oligarchy, order in Belarus is a throat!
    Yes, "dad" is spinning like a whirligig, but he really, and not just in words, helps his people to survive.
    You say that young people flee west. And from the USSR they fled west. But who needs them there.
    Our destiny is to be one people forever!
  27. ermak05
    ermak05 30 May 2012 20: 03
    0
    Belarus time to decide! Either she is dreaming, or she is the enemy! In general, Old Man done!