Around PR? In "EP" require not to release a comedy about the blockade of Leningrad in the rental

91
The parliamentary majority party decided to seize the opportunity to demonstrate "protecting the population" and historical truth. Such an opportunity for United Russia is given by the director of the film "Holiday", about which "Military Review" reported in one of the news materials the other day.

We are talking about the film, which the director Krasovsky himself announced as a “black comedy” - about how family representatives “in a special position” meet the new 1942 year in the blockade starving Leningrad with champagne and fried chicken on the table.



Around PR? In "EP" require not to release a comedy about the blockade of Leningrad in the rental


The decision itself to make a comedy about the tragedy caused a wave of negativity in society. And United Russia made its own decision - to try to earn political points, taking the side of the aforementioned public.

Thus, the secretary of the General Council of the ER party, Andrei Turchak, came up with an initiative that concerns the non-issuance of a rental certificate for the film “Holiday”, directed by Alexey Krasovsky.

The statement of the high-ranking United Russia party is given at the party site:
Now I’m talking not as a politician, but as a Leningrader whose grandmother survived the blockade and defended the city on the Neva. Shooting such a “movie” is a mockery of the history of our people. There are topics that can not be joked. I appeal to the head of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Medinsky, with a requirement not to issue a rental certificate to this “painting” under any circumstances.


Turchak continues:
To turn human tragedy into farce and comedy is no longer an art, it is a blasphemy beyond human understanding. The top of cynicism is to shoot comedies about events where, according to various sources, from 400 thousands to 1,5 millions of people died.


The ban on this kind of film is relevant. But ... Director Krasovsky, it seems, has achieved his. With the help of a frank provocation, he drew the attention of millions of people to his "Holiday", managed to cause a stir and bring the issue to the highest echelons of power. In the end, neoliberals have already stated that the ban on issuing a rolling license to the film will become “pressure on the artist, undermining freedom of speech,” and stuff like that. In general, the provocation took place.

Previously, Web users suggested Krasovsky to remove the “black comedy”, for example, about the Holocaust ... so as not to turn off the chosen creative path.
  • Site "ER"
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    16 October 2018 06: 56
    And "United Russia" made its own decision - to try to earn political points by taking the side of the mentioned public.
    - this will not help her, the film is likely to fail at 99%, and edro it is edro in Africa too ...
    1. +40
      16 October 2018 07: 06
      something is wrong with the country, a general degradation, this can be seen in the media, especially on TV. Films are simply filmed for the "near-minded" so as not to think too much. The songs are sung - "a set of letters" ... And with external "concern for History" quiet, The history of the country is wiped. Why else did they launch the renaming of airports? to whom such a "bright thought" flew into the head? in the memory of the people, Sheremetyevo and Domodedovo, Pulkovo and Koltsovo, will forever remain so, this is 100%. we had a cinema "Yubileiny" in our city, 20 years ago, it was converted into a night club, then it was bought by "magnet" ... so what? do you think people go to the "magnet" for groceries? no ... in "Jubilee"! Moreover, children who do not know where from, and they are called as parents. What do I mean, why are these renaming? there is only one answer, the memory of the USSR is erased. capitalism, everything is allowed except Truth and Decency.
      1. +4
        16 October 2018 09: 25
        A statement by a high-ranking United Russia leader is provided on the party website:
        Shooting such a “movie” is a mockery of the history of our people. There are topics that cannot be joked about. I appeal to the head of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Medinsky, with a requirement not to issue a rental certificate to this “painting” under any circumstances.

        Found to whom to contact - to Medinsky !!!

        Suffice it to recall the illegal installation of a memorial plaque to Mannerheim in St. Petersburg under the approval of Sergei Ivanov and Medinsky himself and a whole "epic" with its removal due to the indignation of the townspeople of besieged Leningrad.

        In fact, all United Russia members with their historical "TRUTH" are smeared with one world - namely, to throw a moral historical perversion on a fan in order to spread it around the world as a liberally obsequious "TRUTH" blackened "TRUTH" of the heroic Russian history for the West.

        A memorial plaque to Mannerheim was opened in St. Petersburg. Published: 16 Jun. 2016
      2. +4
        16 October 2018 09: 43
        Renaming is not only an erasure of history, but also an erasure from the people's memory. A generation will pass and they will speak Magnet, not Jubilee, although the name is certainly sloppy, partisan, non-Russian, and when the first letter of the word is replaced by the sixth alphabet ... This is partly a normal phenomenon and the same communists, having turned over many names, just ran into their rake, tearing our people from antiquity and making it sluggish. If this does not apply to ancient names such as villages where airports were built, except for the immortalization of the Sheremetyevs, who are as rootless as the Romanovs and who crawled out with them when the latter were covering the ancient names for themselves. The Sheremetyevs are relatives of the Romanovs and descend from the Mare. Of course, the church did the greatest harm, the Romanovs are in second place, for three hundred years they have been messing with history and consciousness, and for 70 years the Communards, 20 years for the Democrats. Here is an interesting slogan of the Romanovs: "For Faith, Tsar and Fatherland!" Those. first for the krilikalny dogma, then for the usurper, and only then for the Fatherland. Also brilliant, but court composer Glinka created "Life for the Tsar!" Although if you take not the Charter of Mikhail, but turn to the enemy's sources, then the following will be ... In the memoirs of the Lithuanian nobleman Samuil Maskevich, the heroic act of an unknown peasant in March 1612 in the Mozhaisk region is told:
        Here, in the village of Vyshentse, we caught the old peasant and took him as a guide, so as not to get lost and come across Volok, where there was a strong enemy. He led us one mile from Volok, and at night he deliberately turned to that place. Already we were only a mile away from him. Fortunately, Rutsky came across to us, who at that time, having led his comrades who had left the capital to the pan hetman, was returning under the very walls of Volok to his apartments in Ruza, where he stood with a Cossack company. We learned from him that we ourselves were going into the hands of the enemy, and hastened to return. The conductor's head was cut off, but no one will return our fear. Those. the fact was, however, before the coronation of Mikhail, in a different place and with another Hero, who led the enemy squad into a trap. Naturally, he died for his homeland. Stalin accepted the slogan at a critical moment: "For the Motherland! For Stalin!" Those. the Motherland comes first, and only then the party and the head of state. The humpbacked monkey came up with: "For perestroika and glassnost!" break and probazar. Initially, Putin was broadcasting: "For United Russia!" I must say that the result is obvious. Now the truth is people will go into battle with the slogan: "For raising the retirement age! There is no money, but we will hold on!"
        1. +2
          16 October 2018 10: 32
          Put the first plus. Others apparently did not master many letters. In short, at all times, the government is trying to fake the heroic actions of the people.
    2. +7
      16 October 2018 07: 08
      Quote: faiver
      - this will not help her, the film is likely to fail at 99%, and edro it is edro in Africa too ...

      --------------------
      I'd rather take a look at the analysis of the "masterpiece" with Zhenya Bazhenov. Anyway, the film is nonsense and not worth such a fuss.
    3. +13
      16 October 2018 07: 09
      It’s fashionable now. To make fun of people's grief. I am surprised that they didn’t make a comedy about Kaloev. They are hoping for everything. The rental certificate should be taken away by quiet sadness and that's it. You don’t need to do advertising with Matilda.
      1. +2
        16 October 2018 08: 06
        Have we already figured out which state we live in?
        The feeling is that the interval from - To Shvoboda, to me to Shvoboda, to -Let all the nuts tighten!
        Holding power only in the buzz, Schaub push us foreheads .... normal, proven tactics. Therefore, they started a bootlegg, to cover their naked fillet with a schaub.
        In principle, such a time, there is no unanimity in any country, they will organize a reason for disagreement.
      2. +9
        16 October 2018 08: 12
        Quote: vkl.47
        It’s fashionable now. To make fun of human grief. I am surprised that they didn’t shoot comedy about Kaloev.

        These "free artists" like Krasovsky are not so frostbitten. They value their ass very much. For a comedy about Kaloev, you can get a death sentence without trial or investigation, as well as for a comedy about the Holocaust. For that, the blockade and the Soviet system can and should be doused with slop (legislation and "tolerance" of blockade granddaughters allows), this is welcome, this is now called a strategic line in the "search for historical truth."
        What to say? What system, such are the "heroes".
    4. +1
      16 October 2018 08: 11
      Quote: faiver
      - this will not help her, the film is likely to fail 99%, and it’s edro in Africa too.

      About the film - not even discussed. Mockery of ancestors is unacceptable. Well, YEDRO will draw voices for himself and, as always, will again pop up. Not a fig will fail - an administrative resource. If Yeltsin "won" the elections, then EDRo even more so.
    5. -2
      16 October 2018 10: 43
      Quote: faiver
      And "United Russia" made its own decision - to try to earn political points by taking the side of the mentioned public.
      - this will not help her, the film is likely to fail at 99%, and edro it is edro in Africa too ...

      Putin will not abandon his party.
  2. +8
    16 October 2018 06: 58
    Yes, this poet also did not even collect money. And here is such a hippish as about an event that took place. And most likely will not collect.
    Let the comedy about Auschwitz removes. And the money will find and the Jews will strangle him
    1. +4
      16 October 2018 07: 06
      So "promo videos" are already showing. On television ... It is clear that he will not get a rental license ... But they can "run" on the Internet ...
      1. +5
        16 October 2018 07: 31
        Meanness must be crushed in the bud so that it does not even go out on a limited screen. negative
    2. +4
      16 October 2018 07: 39
      send to France the "artist", to another figure.
      let the genatals beat their nails on the Champs Elysees steamed, synchronously or in turn.
    3. 0
      16 October 2018 09: 10
      Quote: Alexkorzun
      Let the comedy about Auschwitz removes.

      And "Life is Beautiful" (a comedy about a fascist concentration camp) is still a good film.
  3. +5
    16 October 2018 07: 03
    Well, this is not "Matilda" (a mediocre film, I confess, I watched it) ... It's a completely different matter. You can't mock the memory of the blockade. Moreover, sucking the plot out of the finger ...
  4. +6
    16 October 2018 07: 03
    neoliberals are already declaring ...
    These traitors, as always, run ahead of the engine with accusations and threats of power. I wonder how they would react if they said that they are preparing a black comedy for example about the life and death of Sakharov or, at worst, Nemtsov?
    1. -1
      16 October 2018 07: 29
      The film is not about the death of the blockade, but about the luxurious life of the party apparatchiks.
      1. +11
        16 October 2018 07: 47
        Was she luxurious? I remember how in the 80-90s Zhdanov had stalks - he was guzzled by pineapples and cake and in hungry Leningrad. And then he found out that he didn’t eat anything sweet at all - diabetes.
  5. +8
    16 October 2018 07: 07
    I saw an excerpt from this "kin" on the net. In general, there are two such messages. The first is about the besieged Leningrad, the second is that the authorities always did not care about the people. There, the offspring of a nomenklatura family invites an ordinary girl Masha to celebrate the New Year, and the mother is categorically against it, because she will see how the bosses live, she suggests simply pouring a basket of pies for Masha, "your Masha" as she put it. In my opinion, I read the first such story in Chakovsky's book "Blockade", where there was a remark that Zhdanov threw out stale loaves while the city was starving. Here is such a small nuance from the Soviet novel swelled to such an ugly film. Soviet films are full of such liberal bookmarks. The film "War in the Western Direction" repeats the story that Stalin was in a stupor and depression a couple of weeks after the start of the war. In general, such a filthy movie was filmed and there is nothing funny there.
  6. +2
    16 October 2018 07: 09
    PR is not PR, but such a high thing has gone that only a lazy politician and artist like has not joined him. Still, such an occasion to catch fish in muddy water and to remind oneself.
    1. +2
      16 October 2018 07: 23
      I propose the following scheme of struggle with such directors. what
      Create a certain group of people (quick response detachment), so to speak, caring for the moral side of things in Russia and sue people like Krasovsky or whoever nailed their eggs on the paving stones of the Kremlin belay ... with a lawsuit for moral suffering in the millions of rubles ... there to include in tenfold the amount of damage caused to property during the actions of this crazy intelligentsia ... you must punish the ruble of such abnormal directors and artists.
      1. 0
        16 October 2018 10: 41
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        there to include in tenfold the damage caused to property during the actions of this crazy intelligentsia ... it is necessary to punish the ruble of such abnormal directors and artists

        And who said that such directors and artists are not normal? They are just in the "trend" of today's realities: memorial plaques to Mannerheim, Krasnov, plywood on the Mausoleum during parades, the production in the USSR of only "galoshes" by the mouth of the President of the Russian Federation, the Bologna education system and "opium for the people" in educational institutions, again Yeltsin-Centers ... Everything is going according to plan. The privatization of the 90s continues! Now we have taken up the privatization of history and memory. What does EP have to do with it? request laughing
  7. +10
    16 October 2018 07: 17
    And here is the PR of United Russia? What's the difference, who will stop liberal fascism and other Art House? In your power should not respond? So you will be the first to shout that Edro is silent.
    Not a defender of the United Russia party, but I do not like it when they use any opportunity to discredit the legitimate government, even in the right to condemn such "art".
    The VO website, yesterday in the publication, even the officials involved in the creation of the project of the motorcade, mentioned modestly the creators of the modular principle platforms, emphasizing that they awarded the officials beaten by football players. Something strange editorial policy has gone.
  8. +1
    16 October 2018 07: 24
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    Who cares who stops liberal fascism and other Art House?

    If the EP was not aroused, then I would not have known what was there, and so, in fact, she made an advertisement for this film. It doesn’t matter what they say, good or bad, the main thing is what they say.
  9. +8
    16 October 2018 07: 24
    Goats are concrete!
    My Grandmother survived the blockade in Leningrad, until the end of her days she did not sweep away a crumb from the table. And here is such an action request
  10. -8
    16 October 2018 07: 26
    Much was said about Matilda and copies were broken, cinemas were set on fire, cursed. I looked. A normal film, but one time. No vulgarity. A fictional tale about Nikolai's romance with a ballerina. It is also possible here. Let people take a look and give their own assessment. If you do not like it, they will forget, like the same "Hitler Kaput". Enough to command people, what to watch, what not to watch. If the state considers the film to be somehow wrong, let it not help financially, but why prohibit distribution?
    1. +12
      16 October 2018 07: 42
      Quote: Rimlianin
      An artistic fairy tale about Nikolai’s novel with a ballerina.

      ------------------------
      As well as the film "Admiral" with Khabensky in the role of Kolchak. The film has nothing to do with history. As well as the film "Moving Up", as well as the film "Sobibor" with the same Khabensky. All these films are about how the modern bourgeoisie presents history. History, naturally for a capitalist, is a collection of vulgar fairy tales and teary-snotty romance.
      1. +4
        16 October 2018 08: 17
        I want to show how a Soviet person becomes normal

        Kostik, 46 years old
    2. +4
      16 October 2018 08: 33
      It is also possible here.
      Since September, food has already been bought by ration cards. A photo from the film the table is bursting with fruit, champagne. The "comedy" is that a servant was taken from this family to dig trenches and the family cannot cook chicken.
      People really died of starvation from shelling, but here it turns out to be ridiculous. Interestingly, this one whose brother died during the blockade, at least move a finger. Or will the liberal act like that?
      1. -7
        16 October 2018 10: 02
        I don’t know how it was during the blockade, but in the army an officer (not platoon, of course, they, along with the soldiers, took death in the trenches), ate very good compared to the soldiers, I can imagine how the party apparatus was eating then. I do not think that in the besieged Leningrad they stood in the general line for bread. So a lot in this film can really be true. And what is not true is fiction, it is also a fiction, not a documentary.
    3. +2
      16 October 2018 10: 26
      Quote: Rimlianin
      but why forbid rental?

      Why preach ?! That means, what questions have gone ... Question-polls ... Yes, it is appropriate to recall that foul poll about the surrender of Leningrad, launched from one swamp. First, polls, and then everyone is surprised: where did Kolya's boys and the "club of latent Bavarian lovers" come from? Not so long ago I had to explain to one organism, positioning itself as a "war museum", why in our museum of artillery German guns are installed with their barrels down. And, in fact, he was sincerely perplexed. Only after the words "Hero City Leningrad" came some semblance of understanding.
      1. -1
        16 October 2018 10: 33
        Yes, you understand, with prohibitions you will only arouse curiosity for this picture, and there actually there is nothing to watch. It is enough to require the distributors to indicate before the show that the film is not shot on real events, but is an artistic invention of the authors.
        1. +2
          16 October 2018 12: 45
          The whole trouble is that there is a certain part (and not a small one) of Russian citizens who make their opinion about the history of our Motherland, and about the Motherland itself on the basis of feature films. They will not read any historical books. There is no critical thinking (especially among young people). It’s not even a matter of banning and all rushing to watch torrents, the fact is that there is almost nothing to see normal in return for this rubbish. Moreover, one gets the feeling that the authorities lack a clear, distinct position on the Great Patriotic War. Therefore, this is periodically pops up.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          16 October 2018 14: 37
          prohibitions only kindle curiosity
          Quote: Rimlianin
          Yes, you understand, prohibitions only kindle curiosity.

          We all went through this in the late 80s - early 90s. So do not try to drip on the brains. One will come up with a lie, the other will say not to dare to forbid this lie ...
          1. -1
            16 October 2018 15: 01
            And what happened in the late 80s? Allowed the people to talk about repression and scold the Communists? The truth is now scolding the Communists, on the contrary, are welcome. Want to ban?
            1. +1
              16 October 2018 15: 04
              And what happened in the late 80s?
              Many things. From a statement similar to yours, allow schools to study an alternative view of history. As a result, it came down to koleizurengoy.
            2. 0
              17 October 2018 00: 43
              Scolding the communists is welcome before the elections))) Yes, the authors did not calculate with the reaction of the authorities. We thought it would work, sort of like "against the commies". The people eat it because it is chernukha. Well, and in the West they will applaud, because, firstly, against the communists, secondly, the crap about Russia, and finally, an allusion to the current government in Russia.
        3. +2
          16 October 2018 14: 55
          Quote: Rimlianin
          Yes, you understand, with prohibitions you will only arouse curiosity for this picture, and there actually there is nothing to watch. It is enough to require the distributors to indicate before the show that the film is not shot on real events, but is an artistic invention of the authors.

          -------------------------
          On the contrary, with hype and advertising it beats off at once to watch another bourgeois masterpiece. And to ban or not to ban me is no longer valid. I forbade myself to watch the central channels and do not regret it, because there is propaganda, hype and trash.
    4. 0
      17 October 2018 00: 10
      Why prohibit rental? Then, that the film was thought in line with the hostile liberal paradigm about the "wrong" war on the part of the Russians. From the same row as the theses: Leningrad would have been better to surrender, Zoya was not a heroine, but a mentally ill arsonist, and in general we threw corpses at the Nazis and drove the Red Army men to Berlin with barriers, etc., etc. Goebbels's propaganda about supposedly fattening party apparatchiks in besieged Leningrad is from the same opera. (By the way, can you tell me what awaited these "fattening" party leaders and their family members if the city had been taken?) It is clear that history (and the history of the Victory in the Second World War in the first place) is one of the ideological bonds of modern Russia ... And to rock them is the task of our enemies, well, and the cinematographers are just keenly holding their nose to the wind, for what kind of craft can you grab a prize in the west (after all, I don't want to consider them conscious enemies)
  11. +4
    16 October 2018 07: 28
    you’re a party in power, sue the director, prohibit the picture from being shown in the country, but don’t stupidly go public. fool this is just the case when you need and should use power over the snickering director and not let the picture out.
  12. +5
    16 October 2018 07: 29
    There are always people who feast during the plague, mock the saint and make money on someone’s grief. The idea behind this is to bring to trial and give a real time, so that the authors understand the comedy is inappropriate. am
    1. -3
      16 October 2018 10: 06
      That's about the movie. That during a plague and grief someone feasted. And someone made money, speculated, looted. Wasn’t this? You can’t talk about it? A comedy sir, different happens. When they make fun of evil, it does not cease to be evil.
      1. +2
        16 October 2018 12: 50
        If there was, then it is necessary to show how the state fought against such. Here, on the one hand, the act of a "speculator / marauder" is disgusting, and on the other, the decisive actions of the Soviet militia in besieged Leningrad. Will it be in the movie? No. There will be a comedy. Will she "make fun of evil"? It is hard to believe.
        Apparently, this film will show the pathological hatred of our creative intelligentsia (perhaps not all) towards the Soviet past of our great country.
        1. 0
          16 October 2018 14: 37
          Quote: teron
          Here, on the one hand, the act of a "speculator / marauder" is disgusting, and on the other, the decisive actions of the Soviet militia in besieged Leningrad.

          By the way, these moments are reflected in the film "Leningrad", which at one time got from the critics, albeit for different reasons.
  13. +3
    16 October 2018 07: 38
    Quote: Rimlianin
    0
    Much has also been said about Matilda and copies are broken, movie theaters were set on fire, cursed. I looked. Normal movie, but at one time. No vulgarity. An artistic fairy tale about Nikolai’s novel with a ballerina.

    it was because of a religious background, there was a noise, they called Nicholas "saints" ... and saints are not supposed to be shown by ordinary people ... smile
    1. 0
      16 October 2018 08: 28
      And what is meant by the word saint? Impotent or what? Well, if he is with anyone and never! It turns out so !?
      1. -1
        16 October 2018 10: 08
        No one recognized him as a saint. The Church recognized the Romanov family as passion-bearers. That is, the martyrs for the faith.
  14. SOF
    +4
    16 October 2018 07: 41
    Quote: Nevsky_ZU
    In your opinion, the authorities should not react?

    .... this is pure political technology ....... and it was not invented here, but overseas ...... I don’t want to believe that, in this case, the wind is defaming everything and everyone blowing from there, but, definitely, the fact of using an "alien" invention on the face ...
    .......... and the principle is simple: running radish man - scream: "Bastard! Why are you raising dust !!!"; is radish in place - resent: "Why are you standing, deer, go aside - you interfere with walking!"
    ..... the main thing is to show that the opponent IS ALWAYS not right ... as in that joke: "You don't whistle like that, you don't fly like that" ....
  15. +11
    16 October 2018 07: 46
    Well, why so? You can not love the party EP, you can even hate it! This is everyone’s business. But if Turchak even says, just like a Leningrad man, that for him this film is a mockery of the history of our people, then he, as a member of United Russia, only demonstrates the protection of the population and promotes ?! He can not be outraged ?! Yes, every normal person in our country should be, to put it mildly, indignant at the party or not! Here is a presentation of material, as in this article is not a black PR ?! No?! What is PR around ?!
    1. 0
      16 October 2018 14: 40
      Quote: Detective
      Here is a presentation of material, as in this article is not a black PR ?! No?! What is PR around ?!

      Well, as we can see, someone even under this theme manages to promote their own and even here does not miss a chance to "shake". Yes, they are like that, and, as is typical, anonymous again.
  16. +4
    16 October 2018 07: 49
    Shoot him, Krasovsky, and the dog with him.
    1. -1
      16 October 2018 10: 36
      Ha ha))) let's get started with you better .. (joke)
    2. 0
      16 October 2018 12: 57
      What for. Just do not give state money for his "creativity". Never.
  17. +4
    16 October 2018 08: 10
    I want to see everyone on the abandoned churchyard, in the article mentioned, and personalities and organizations
    1. 0
      16 October 2018 08: 55
      Maybe not on an abandoned ...

      Just outside the fence.

      hi
  18. +4
    16 October 2018 08: 18
    I, as a taxpayer, are interested in the question - did the Ministry of Culture allocate money for this film shooter too?
    1. +2
      16 October 2018 08: 49
      Quote: Slinqshot
      did the Ministry of Culture allocate money for this film shooter?

      This one is raising funds on the Internet. The Ministry of Culture has not seemed to connect yet, which is strange, they usually sponsor all anti-Soviet abomination in the forefront.
    2. 0
      16 October 2018 08: 55
      No, he has been collecting money himself already about 150 tons of rubles. And after all there are people who give them.
  19. +1
    16 October 2018 08: 22
    Maybe they do not require a ban, but really promote themselves and the film?
    Actually, you need to ask lawyers. Is there an article on which this director can be imprisoned?
    1. -2
      16 October 2018 10: 40
      Are you a fan of directors? Well then, wellcome to the company of ghouls Yezhov and Berries. Those, too, did not like the creative intelligentsia.
      1. +1
        16 October 2018 12: 53
        You know, I'm starting to understand them.
      2. +2
        16 October 2018 14: 33
        Are you a fan of directors?
        I asked this because I’m not in power. If I were in power, I would shoot this Krasovsky for distorting history and creating a dirty image of the country. However, Andryusha Malakhov would have thundered first under my execution. That's who brains citizens citizens.
  20. +6
    16 October 2018 08: 28
    My deceased mother and older sisters, my late mother-in-law lived the blockade in Leningrad. They talked about what was there, so I have the right to discuss. First, the film is at the wrong place. If it told about the life of speculators, who were in abundance, and who were taken to sell things for bread, I would agree with such a statement of the question. But it was a market economy, sacred for our liberals. Secondly, I don’t know how things were with the supply in the party, but my wife’s grandfather was the head of the shop at the Arsenal plant. He received an increased ration, but gave it to his mother-in-law so that she could feed hungry children. and he died. Thirdly, what kind of fried chicken there are, on what they could be fried. Most likely, we could talk about stolen alcohol and American stew - that would be more truthful. And then - invented too - champagne!
  21. 0
    16 October 2018 08: 45
    Anecdote to the topic
    The child of a Russian official asks mom:
    - Mom, what is patriotism?
    - Son, this is when people work every day so that we can have villas abroad, expensive yachts, take worthy places on the Forbes list, and so on.
    “But mom, aren't people angry about this?”
    - Of course they are angry, this is called extremism!
  22. +3
    16 October 2018 08: 46
    We know how not to love our country, our history. I don’t know the whole situation that happened during the years of the Second World War, and behind the scenes of the life of our leaders of the country, but ... maybe it’s necessary to show where some negative aspects were present, but it’s possible to show this “pathos with negativity” and “sweetly” only us. Maybe I'm wrong, but I have not seen any American or European films in which they so exposed in front of the whole "light" of their historical personalities or "era". Only if this film is again not about us. What I like about America, it seems to me that they know how to love their country, sometimes even forcing others to “love” it. And God forbid it will be different.
    In our country, for not loving our country, they present awards, erect monuments and even erect whole complexes-centers. It’s not love for one’s country that equates almost to a “cult." Therefore, GDP needs to be done. But unfortunately he just awards these individuals. And "Edros" will re-try three more times, depending on how GDP looks at it.
    1. +1
      16 October 2018 09: 02
      In America, so glorified and idolized by these personalities, such a film would be the last one they would make. And not only for the director, but for all those indicated in the credits.
  23. BAI
    +2
    16 October 2018 08: 52
    Why resent now? At one time, the war veterans were not heard when Hitler Kaput was released (of course - Sobchak herself was filming (she was still in favor at that time)), then there was "What Men Talk About", "White Tiger", "Stalingrad" and I'm sorry Lord - "Burnt by the Sun" (I listed what I saw). If everyone sees that the mockery of the history of the war finds state support, then why raise the wave now?
  24. +5
    16 October 2018 09: 12
    My father died on the Leningrad front on December 27.12.1941, 27. Major, created heavy railroad artillery. Her actions did not allow the Nazis even to group two tanks at Pulkovo. The firing error at 15 km was 20-XNUMX m. The Baltians, correction points, "Meat Combine" and "House of Soviets" (this is where JSC "Leninets", A. Turchak's father, General Director A. Turchak there). I was familiar with G. Romanov. He knew the Secretary of the Leningrad City Committee of the CPSU (b) Kuznetsov. There were no such rations in the city then. They appeared when "The Road of Life" started working.
    Here is my teacher S.V. Spirov (director of NII-33) in 1942 created a Far East radio station. She conducted programs in Europe in German from the besieged Leningrad. Every 17-29 seconds, the metronome froze. This meant that another fascist was killed at the front. That's what the film is about.
    I think that deputies of the St. Petersburg Territorial Committee should sue this director and the Minister of Culture for defiling the memory of Leningrad residents. Only such actions when a deputy of the ZK City A. Kovalev sued the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation managed to dismantle the memorial plaque of the fascist mannerheim from the city building. And it was posted by none other than the Minister of Culture.
  25. 0
    16 October 2018 09: 15
    Whose money was the film used for? I suspect that the names will be kosher
  26. 0
    16 October 2018 09: 43
    Everything is thought out. The authors perfectly understood the soreness of the topic, but deliberately filmed it. Who is their guide, who is wise? I would not want to look for a black cat where it is known, but it seems that this is the next order of the adversary to our degenerates. You can and should make a movie about the blockade, but the genre is one DRAMA. My parents survived the horror of the blockade, both grandfathers died of starvation, my mother’s elder brother died on the Neva heel. It would be nice to know which of the actors agreed to star in the libel?
  27. 0
    16 October 2018 09: 48
    Whatever it was, the film will still be seen if desired, and judging (if done) is on the conscience of each of us. That generation is leaving, ours and our children will understand the same thing, but further it depends on the system, and at the moment it is like a rainbow, with two signs on the contrary.
  28. 0
    16 October 2018 10: 07
    A comedy about the Holocaust was shot and everyone considered it a masterpiece
    1. 0
      16 October 2018 14: 48
      A picture of this Benigni moron?
      Extremely idiotic movie
  29. 0
    16 October 2018 10: 09
    Why make noise on this topic, what is the point of publicizing this wretched. Since he does not understand that one cannot laugh at the death of a million people, then simply identify him where he belongs, for life in the fool. That's all. Another will be the science of what is possible in a civilized society, and what is not, under any circumstances.
  30. -1
    16 October 2018 10: 14
    "Charlie Hebdo" made it to Russia

    and after all there are shit who will watch this "creativity".
  31. +1
    16 October 2018 11: 13
    Recall Sergei Bondarchuk Jr. with his bad film Stalingrad.
    1. 0
      16 October 2018 15: 23
      Actually, his name is Fedya. In addition to Stalingrad, he still managed to liquidate with 9 vomits - where stupid people did not know how to change the trunk on a PC.
  32. 0
    16 October 2018 11: 14
    If the filming of this "Shadèvre" begins, then the Leningraders should boycott the filming, throw the actors, and the entire film crew with eggs and tomatoes.
    1. 0
      16 October 2018 11: 28
      and Che only Leningraders? and you and the rest of the citizens or the rest do not need? Yes, and it is a PR public for attracting liberal and foreign money to obscurantism!
  33. +1
    16 October 2018 11: 25
    you need to stigmatize such directors and not allow them to be creative, otherwise he still takes pictures! already know one in France sits! and to the bruschatka horseradish pinned up his!
  34. 0
    16 October 2018 11: 50
    Why not mock? After all, it was possible to rob. Everything is allowed, which is not prohibited.
  35. 0
    16 October 2018 13: 00
    In general, I do not see anything funny and comedic on this topic.
  36. 0
    16 October 2018 14: 31
    neoliberals already claim that a ban on the issuance of a rental certificate to a film will be “pressure on the artist, an undermining of freedom of speech”, and so on.

    Spit on the neoliberals. An adequate public in Russia is the majority.
    In general, the provocation took place.

    In the minds of the liberals. For me, it happened that if they take off this scumbag, they won’t let them go and it doesn’t matter who tried there, EP, PR, etc. etc. All curtain, shut up dear comrades liberals, this is called democracy!
  37. 0
    16 October 2018 15: 11
    For such "comedies" it is necessary to plant 3-4 years without further ado.
  38. 0
    16 October 2018 15: 33
    United Russia only approves the comedy about pension reform. Only the cat is not on the screen, but in life, which is even worse.
  39. -1
    16 October 2018 15: 52
    The ban on this kind of film is relevant. Well, of course)
    PLOT

    Siege Leningrad, December 31. In the country house of the Voskresenskys, living "in a special situation," six people gather and a chicken that there is no one to cook. Previously, the cook was engaged in this, but she was taken away from the Voskresenskys the day before - hard times came on the outside, and inside the situation is also not easy: the youngest son brought a hungry girl, the eldest daughter of an unknown man, whom he is going to marry. There are only a few minutes left until the New Year, and the number of problems is growing like a snowball.
    HISTORICAL REFERENCE
    Beginning November 20, 1941, Leningraders received the lowest rate of bread for the entire time of the blockade: 250 for a work card and 125 for an employee and a child. Work cards in November - December 1941 received only a third of the population. But this did not concern, for example, Nikolay Ribkovsky, instructor of the personnel department of the city committee of the CPSU (b). From his diaries of December 9, 1941:
    Now I don't feel much need for food. In the morning, breakfast - pasta or noodles, or porridge with butter and two glasses of sweet tea. In the afternoon lunch - the first cabbage soup or soup, the second meat every day. Yesterday, for example, I ate green cabbage soup with sour cream for the first, cutlet with noodles for the second, and today for the first soup with noodles, the second - pork with stewed cabbage. "
    In the spring of 1942, Ribkovsky was sent to the party sanatorium "for health improvement", where he continued to keep a diary. Record of March 5: "For three days now I have been in the hospital of the city party committee. Every day meat - mutton, ham, chicken, goose, turkey, sausage; fish - bream, herring, smelt, and fried, and boiled, and aspic. , balyk, cheese, pies, cocoa, coffee, tea, 300 grams of white and the same amount of black bread per day ... and to all this, 50 grams of grape wine, good port wine for lunch and dinner ... Me and two more comrades we get an additional breakfast: a couple of sandwiches or a bun and a glass of sweet tea ... War is almost not felt. Only the clatter of guns reminds of it ... ".

    Data on the number of products delivered daily to the Leningrad Regional Committee and the CPSU (b) Gorky in wartime is still inaccessible to researchers.
  40. 0
    16 October 2018 16: 03
    Here are dissatisfied with the film, but go here
    https://topwar.ru/148445-v-akademii-genshtaba-podschitali-poteri-krasnoj-armii-pod-prohorovkoj.html
    Here the directors are abruptly from the Ministry of Defense. And for my indignation, I grabbed the cons. What is it like. Director byaka, and the Ministry of Defense can doubt the exploits of our ancestors? Or is there nothing more to do in the ministry?
  41. 0
    16 October 2018 23: 40
    These morons have nothing more to do? there are no more problems in the country? everyone decides what to watch, who does not want to - do not force anyone. What does the officials have to do with it?
  42. 0
    17 October 2018 10: 54
    So not a fact, they also gave money to create this libel. And now such wrestlers !!! Ugh.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"