Chinese Navy: Where to land?

39
Any update of the armed forces of any country raises questions. Having answered them, sometimes it is even possible to predict or expose the country's defense doctrine with some accuracy. The main thing is to analyze the available information correctly. Do not become an exception to the new landing ships in the PLA Navy. Given the attitude of some countries to China, it is not difficult to guess the causes of anxiety aimed at landing ships of the 071 project. Moreover, they are the largest ships in the Chinese naval forces, which only boosted foreign interest.

Chinese Navy: Where to land?


It is obvious that the landing ship is not intended for any other purposes, except for the landing of amphibious assault forces. From here we have a simple, clear and logical question: where is China going to land its landings? The first thing that comes up in the discussions of Chinese territorial claims is the topic of Taiwan. The war between the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China has been predicted for more than a decade, and with each rearmament of the People's Republic of China, its probability is considered increasingly high. However, so far there have been no serious actions. Both sides still exchange all sorts of bad actions, but they are not in a hurry to open the front. After appearing in the Navy of the People’s Liberation Army of China landing craft of the 071 project, some analysts immediately revealed to the world the “true cause” of the absence of open conflict. According to them, all this time, China did not attack Taiwan only because it did not have the appropriate ships. Now, it is alleged, the navy can land almost from day to day. At the same time, there is a perception that Beijing has no plans to seize Taiwan. Over the past decades, the Chinese leadership has somewhat come to terms with the actual independence of Taiwan. Among other things, the reason for this is the developed relations between Taiwan and the United States. China is unlikely to want to unleash a war with a superpower for the sake of just one island.

There is also another fact, which to some extent confirms the preparation for the landing on Taiwan. The first two ships of the 071 project, the Kunlunshan and the Jinggangshan, are based in the province of Guangdong, located on the coast of the South China Sea. Thus, the landing craft will need to go all 750-800 kilometers from the home port to the Taiwanese coast. A relatively small distance, if necessary, may work on the surprise attack, but the Taiwanese armed forces are modern enough not to miss ships with troops, especially the largest in the PLA Navy.



As we see, the PRC's attack on Taiwan raises enough questions that cast doubt on the success of the entire operation. The Chinese leadership simply cannot fail to understand this and is unlikely preparing plans to disembark on an independent island from day to day. At the same time, Beijing’s territorial claims do not end in the Republic of China. The Chinese have long shown interest in several islands in the South China Sea. According to some sources, these few pieces of land have good mineral reserves. Official Beijing has several times expressed its intention to take these islands to itself "under its wing." Other countries in the region, such as the Philippines or Vietnam are against it. In their opinion, the disputed islands should belong not to China, but to them. It is not difficult to guess why Vietnam or the Philippines want to get these territories. It should be noted, in these countries, fear not only the loss of mineral deposits. Having received another resource base, China will be able to finally and irrevocably become the economic, industrial and military leader of the South Asian region. And here we recall the words of Comrade Mao, who directly stated that it was necessary for China to “collect” several countries in the region. Naturally, the neighbors of the Middle Kingdom are nervous and do not give consent to the joining of disputed islands.

Since the islands are not owned by anyone, they are virtually uninhabited. As a result, the capture operation will be fairly simple. And it will be the Marine Corps that can be dealt with, which will be delivered to the place by amphibious ships. It should also be noted that marines on the ships "071" can not only take these islands, but also discourage them from other "competitors". It is impossible to exclude the possibility that some of the countries currently arguing in the near future will independently, without any approval from the side, attach the disputed territories to themselves. In this case, within a few days, China will be able to launch a “peacekeeping” operation to “liberate” the islands. It remains only to wonder whether Beijing will make the islands empty again, take it away or leave it “under protectorate”. Regardless of the outcome of such a conflict, the landing craft of the 071 project will be very useful. It can even be argued that they will play a decisive role in all the battles for the islands.



It is hardly possible to find more suitable “targets” for Project 071 landing craft except Taiwan and the islands of the South China Sea. Of course, with a cruising range of at least 7-8 thousand nautical miles, these ships can operate in more remote areas, but so far China has not shown its special interest in the regions falling into this radius. So in addition to the versions about preparing an attack on the nearby islands, you can consider the option of a banal development of your fleet. It just so happened that the ships of Project 071 are the largest in size and displacement in the Chinese fleet. In the coming months, the PLA Navy will receive its first Shi Lan aircraft carrier. Although this warship is not China’s own development, an increased interest in it can already be predicted. So, already this fall, discussions on the topic "why China should have landing ships?" give way to similar reasoning about the aircraft carrier. Still, the Shi Lan is one and a half times longer than the Kunlunshan and has a three times greater displacement. Good reason to think.


On the materials of the sites:
http://lenta.ru/
http://globalsecurity.org/
http://voennovosti.ru/
http://strategycenter.net/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Shuhrat turani
    +6
    29 May 2012 09: 04
    too many questions ... Like any other country, China is trying to expand its operational resources for a more flexible response to emerging threats ... This is quite logical and appropriate ... Well done Chinese !!!!
    1. Sergh
      +2
      29 May 2012 09: 19
      The most modern amphibious assault ships of the Chinese Naval Forces is the Project 071 UDC. Unlike landing helicopter carriers such as the French Mistral or Spanish Juan Carlos I, where almost the entire deck is used as a flight pad, the Chinese UDC is more focused on the scheme that was used by the Americans in the construction of universal dock ships of the San Antonio type. But if American UDCs look like warships, then Chinese UDCs of the type can be easily mistaken for a cruise liner with a large pool.

      On ships of the "071" type there is a well-developed runway. A take-off and landing area for two seats, together with a hangar.

      There is also a dock for the DKVP Air cushion landing craft (2 large or 4 medium). As for the air-cushion landing craft themselves: until recently, China had only light representatives, type 724, with a maximum of 10 troops. But later, thanks to the study of the DKVP purchased in Russia, the Murena air-cushion landing boat (and, possibly, industrial espionage in the United States) was able to develop landing boats capable of transferring heavy military equipment (DKPV similar to the American LCAC).

      Landing - 500-900 people. Payload: up to 15-20 armored vehicles.

      In total, 6 ships are planned in the series.
      1. nitro
        +12
        29 May 2012 10: 29
        And why did the author not analyze the possibility of a landing in the Primorsky Territory of Russia?
        We have an objective and complete discussion of all problems, but not tearing individual pieces out of context and reinterpreting in our own way? good
        Yes, China does not need war with high-tech Taiwan! Enough to spread these tales. Hong Kong at hand and what - no one has occupied it? As the British once brought civilization into it, so it evolved to cosmic heights, convincing the billion other Chinese in the correct choice of the capitalist path!
        Russia and individual disputed or even foreign oil-bearing islands - this, in my humble opinion, is the main goal of "strengthening the defense capability" of the Chinese fleet!
        And where and when will the Russian Mistral land the troops, here is a really interesting question .... wink
        1. Shuhrat turani
          +1
          29 May 2012 11: 20
          What's the point? To disable or hijack marine infrastructure, it is enough to strike by ground forces ... Under conditions of weak development of communications between Siberia and D. Vostok, this will be ineffective ... In the event of a war with China, you will have to deal with tank formations in Kazakhstan ... If Russia will not prevent actions in this direction, attacks will follow Moscow, the Caucasus, the Urals from footholds in the North-West of Kazakhstan ... it makes sense to use landings to capture Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands, the naval base in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, but 5-6 landing ships for this too few
          1. -1
            29 May 2012 11: 23
            ooh strategists pulled themselves up
            And what will armored armada cover for from the air?
            here is a scheme for railway

            and here is the scheme of airfields

            discuss it?
            1. Shuhrat turani
              -4
              29 May 2012 11: 43
              And what should they build roads, especially since the north-west of China is a steppe territory, roads are being built there quickly, the situation is the same with airfields. This problem is technical, completely solvable ...
          2. Marat
            +7
            29 May 2012 18: 35
            At this point in time, it is obvious that China is not preparing aggression against Kazakhstan and Russia - its geopolitical adversary is a blow, and we and Russia are a resource rear - friendly in their Chinese understanding - especially since the Russian and Kazakh leaders are in this and supports them

            But leadership is one thing - and ordinary people are different - ask anyone in the street in Alma Ata what he thinks about China - get a clear answer - this is a thousand-year threat.

            Now, of course, the main danger is pen n d ost an

            But the peoples of all Eurasia must remember that China is a "friend" only for a while - and in order to make friends with it safely - one must be united into a large and strong country - one cannot be Russia or Kazakhstan - one must be the USSR-2
        2. SIT
          +9
          29 May 2012 12: 00
          And where to land in the Primorsky Territory? Only in the area of ​​Vladivostok and Nakhodka. From other places further inland it is only possible on foot or on caterpillars up to the ears in the mud along the hills through the taiga. You can land in Vladivostok and before if it is successful (which is also not easy) to strike a nuclear weapon there, otherwise only those who can swim and be able to cut the lacing on their boots so that they don’t pull to the bottom will get ashore. All this dishes will go to the ground at the entrance to the Gulf of Peter the Great. And the local Chinese, who have a business in Vladik, will not be delighted when, instead of our old habitual cops, who have already paid for everything, the PLA patrols suddenly appear. You’ll come to an agreement with these, they can slap on a stadium in front of TV cameras on Friday, and the bill for cartridges will be sent to the family.
          1. Bashkaus
            +3
            30 May 2012 16: 59
            I had to be in Vladivostok, geographically it is on an appendix-type peninsula. So I walked along the railway embankment in the country. every few hundred meters on the shore there are concrete fortifications the size of a little more than a telephone booth with embrasures towards the bay. Bunker for one or two people with a heavy machine gun. The line of fortifications is continuous by 10 kilometers. At first glance, they are not visible, everything is overgrown, but after 10 minutes of work with a sapper blade, everything is put in order.
  2. Tirpitz
    -1
    29 May 2012 09: 19
    That's it, I support, and we do not even have the concept of using amphibious assault ships of this class. The Navy itself does not really know why they need Mistral. There is still debate.
    1. +1
      29 May 2012 09: 29
      hamsters argue on the Internet and the Navy has long known))))
      Yes, and the Mistral will be more interesting IMHO, maybe there is a likelihood of its use as an ersatz aircraft carrier for aircraft with GDP or a shortened takeoff run ala Yak-130 (in different versions)
      1. Tirpitz
        +2
        29 May 2012 09: 51
        Yeah, especially when the rumors about the deal went, none of the command could explain why the Mistals, if there wasn’t even an escort for them. This is a political deal.
        1. +1
          29 May 2012 11: 08
          But corvettes and frigates is never an escort?
          And Vladivostok, which goes to the Pacific Fleet, there’s absolutely nothing to escort)))))
          And when Sevastopol arrives at the Black Sea Fleet there will already be 11357 frigates and corvettes 20380
          and so well, absolutely nothing and no one knows anything)))))
          1. Sokol peruna
            -2
            29 May 2012 12: 28
            leon-iv
            And Vladivostok, which goes to the Pacific Fleet, there’s absolutely nothing to escort)))))


            Both go to the Pacific Fleet, and escort depending on where, if it is far, then all 6 living ships of the first rank. Regarding corvettes and frigates, then by the arrival of the second Mistral "Sevastopol" in 2015, it is good if the firebrand ASZ "Perfect" (And which Wise Man chose the name wassat ) will become part of the Pacific Fleet.

            And when Sevastopol arrives at the Black Sea Fleet there will already be 11357 frigates and corvettes 20380


            11356 is there, I also know 11356Р which is used for in-plant documentation, and 11357 - no, I don’t know, there wasn’t such. 20380 - they will not go to the Black Sea Fleet, but 20385 will go, but not a single one has yet been laid.

            and so well, absolutely nothing and no one knows anything)))))


            Yes, so far we are homely-palmar. laughing
            1. -2
              29 May 2012 12: 56
              Both go to the Pacific Fleet
              Xs of my sources only 1 on Pacific Fleet
              11356Р which is used for in-plant documentation
              In RuNet, the debate is still how to click it.
              20380 - they will not go to the Black Sea Fleet\
              there is an opinion that they will send "Guarding" and "Savvy"
              And 20385 will be finished on the BF
              1. Sokol peruna
                0
                29 May 2012 13: 04
                Xs of my sources only 1 on Pacific Fleet

                http://military.tomsk.ru/blog/topic-163.html
                http://russian-ships.info/boevye/mistral.htm

                In RuNet, the debate is still how to click it.

                11357 seemed to be invented by journalists.

                there is an opinion that they will send "Guarding" and "Savvy"
                And 20385 will be finished on the BF

                About sending to the Black Sea Fleet frigates pr.11540 a couple of years ago, the same many rumors circulated, but apparently changed their minds. About "Guarding" and "Savvy" such information did not come across. Officially, the first 4 buildings of the North. shipyards will go to BF.
                1. 0
                  29 May 2012 13: 14
                  http://russian-ships.info/boevye/mistral.htm
                  and the meaning of 2 such ships is to shove into 1 fleet when it is also needed in other fleets.
                  1 is understandable by a number of arsenies from the Ka-52
                  in the second there is no sense.
                  11357 seemed to be invented by journalists.
                  yes xs still can not decide for the armament and interior will be different from the Indians. Well, it’s not the essence that they are being built, and this is the main thing.
                  I have not met such information about "Guarding" and "Savvy"
                  He himself heard from a relative he serves in Gadzhievo but is very likely. Cockroaches are caught on the Baltic Fleet and then calmly transferred to the Black Sea Fleet and cockroaches are caught at 20385 where there will be a lot of them with air defense.
                  1. Sokol peruna
                    0
                    29 May 2012 19: 08
                    and the meaning of 2 such ships is to shove into 1 fleet when it is also needed in other fleets.

                    And what should they do in the "bottle" seas? There will be enough "Poles" and "Grenov".

                    yes xs still can not decide for the armament and interior will be different from the Indians. Well, it’s not the essence that they are being built, and this is the main thing.

                    The artillery mount A-190, UKSK 3S14, according to PLO and air defense, is definitely not yet clear.

                    He himself heard from a relative he serves in Gadzhievo but is very likely.

                    I looked at the branches on the marine forum of the balancer. There is no information on the transfer of corvettes. Time will tell they will not go.

                    Cockroaches are caught on the Baltic Fleet and then calmly transferred to the Black Sea Fleet and cockroaches are caught at 20385 where there will be a lot of them with air defense.

                    Here you are absolutely right. Clever consider generally without air defense systems. A redoubt from Furke can’t shoot in principle. Yes, and the A-190 is still quite crude.
                    1. 0
                      29 May 2012 19: 15
                      And what should they do in the "bottle" seas?
                      Strange as it may seem, the headquarters and "friends" are many and the Bosphorus and Dardanelles are nearby
                      The artillery mount A-190, UKSK 3S14, according to PLO and air defense, is definitely not yet clear.
                      As they say again, as in a joke about the nuance
                      I looked at the branches on the marine forum of the balancer. There is no information on the transfer of corvettes. Time will tell they will not go.
                      I myself recently found out over a glass of tea (a relative of a signalman) but it looks quite logical.
            2. 77bor1973
              -1
              30 May 2012 20: 43
              do not rejoice - until "Sevastopol" arrives at Pacific Fleet 20385 there will already be, two are already being laid this year, and they are being built quite quickly, the last one was built in 1.5 years, they only waited for weapons!
              1. Sokol peruna
                0
                31 May 2012 05: 05
                Yes, you are on the go at all in the subject. For the Pacific Fleet, 20380 are being built at the NEA, and 20385 will be built by the Northern Shipyard for the Northern Fleet and the Black Sea Fleet. They are being built for today for 7 years. In the future, they can reduce the construction time to 4 years. And in 1.5 years, landing boats have not been built here either.
                PS I'm not happy, I'm trying to really assess the situation in the Navy and in the shipbuilding industry
                without big words and jingoistic patriotism and calls to put to the wall those who think differently from you.
    2. +1
      30 May 2012 19: 39
      We may not, but RUSSIA has
  3. Altergo
    +1
    29 May 2012 09: 21
    Yes, the Chinese act according to the correct principle "Vanka listens and eats."
  4. vostok
    +3
    29 May 2012 10: 12
    Let them capture Taiwan, see if the United States can protect its ally.
  5. +2
    29 May 2012 10: 54
    Vryatli for the sake of Taiwan, the United States will fight with China, because these countries are strongly connected economically and the Chinese can collapse their dollar, moreover, the Chinese army is much more powerful than the Iraqi army, plus they have nuclear weapons
  6. borisst64
    0
    29 May 2012 10: 58
    In China, the main infrastructure is located along the coast and landing ships are logical to use, including for the mobility of troops on its territory.
  7. Patriot
    -7
    29 May 2012 11: 49
    And where else can Chinese special forces land except in our country?
    Indeed, the little girl cleaned the territory for them from the local population so competently. And Putin's state corporation is ready for their investments. Waiting for His Owners !!!
    1. 0
      29 May 2012 11: 51
      ohh again the patriots pulled themselves up by the facts have something to say?
      And IMHO it’s easier to land from submarines and small boats, but not at all from such scows.
    2. CARBON
      0
      30 May 2012 22: 42
      Try to calculate how many of these ships you need to land, 1 division. And how many more are friends to supply her. They may try to land an analogue of the Eupotorian landing of 1941. Heroic death can be ensured
  8. Patriot
    +1
    29 May 2012 12: 21
    In fact, say it. FACTS ON THE FACE! IS NOT IT?

    I'll tell you right away that I'm not a sailor. I'm a rocket officer. But, for "It's a shame" Power!
    1. -1
      29 May 2012 12: 25
      Media type?
      And which VUS
      Yes, and no facts, I again did not hear from you.
  9. Patriot
    +2
    29 May 2012 13: 03
    9K79N

    Tactical solid propellant missile Point.

    If it tells you something.

    As they say, there is nothing secret here. Since, if desired, on the Internet you can find out everything that we once considered secret information and to which we had secret access.
    1. -1
      29 May 2012 13: 23
      Well, as if About the point I am in the know. And what is the WUS?
      and this is the general name of the complex and not a specific installation. bully

      mdya and find me a flight profile
      and the type of SBN for it in a non-nuclear version, because they are bully
  10. Patriot
    +5
    29 May 2012 13: 50
    So I told you about the complex. Moreover, we had an old-style point. Without "U". And, in general ... You WANT to know too much on open and unprotected air. What if you are an FSB guy who forces the interlocutor to blurt out too much ...? wink
    If you want to know something about this complex, you can look here.
    http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-191.html
    1. -1
      29 May 2012 13: 59
      You see, there are secrets))))
      So there with Chinese military power and an empty Far East.
  11. Patriot
    +4
    29 May 2012 14: 15
    Yes. I had a friend who served there on a contract basis. In general, it confirms the worst statements both regarding population density and the quality and quantity of military units! There was no reason to lie to him. Just told everything as it is.
    And if so ... That situation is very regrettable.
  12. Patriot
    +3
    29 May 2012 14: 31
    But much has been said about Chinese military power.
  13. Grits
    +7
    29 May 2012 17: 28
    I live in Primorye. Compared to what happened during the USSR, the collapse is complete. There are practically no military on the border. In the case of the Chinese movement, only the swamps beyond Ussuri and Hanka can slow them down. Since from their side well-groomed fields, and from ours - reeds. But they will cut the Trans-Siberian Railway and the Vladivostok-Khabarovsk highway on the very first day.

    And here are the forces that will slow down the Chinese in the Far East.
    I am sure that a strike on economically developed areas in the depths of China cannot be avoided ...
    1. -1
      29 May 2012 18: 54
      and in your opinion will be politeness?
      no strike will be immediately by all means, including nuclear weapons
      I also want to add that border protection equipment has become more difficult technically and gradually the sharp-sighted guard is also a thing of the past.
      By the way, thanks for the map, it clearly shows that it is necessary to cover only strategic directions. And on the hills you don’t really find it.
      Threat PLA also declined.
  14. Patriot
    +3
    29 May 2012 18: 13
    And, unlike us, China is only building up its military power. And, it does not destroy with "reforms" and "modernizations" which Putin and Serdyukov are actively pursuing according to the recipes of their masters - the enemies of Russia.
    1. 0
      29 May 2012 19: 00
      yes yes reduction of PLA to 1,5 million people
      And considering that they have much more problems in Asia than with Russia, for example, with India, then everything falls into place.
      Threat in order to fight with Russia, she needs to conduct a reginal war before this.
    2. 0
      30 May 2012 13: 47
      This "their owners" appeared in about December 2011, just before the elections to the Duma and went for a walk on the Internet. Before that, no one said that it was as if Putin was working for someone there))) As the elections are so black PR and go, calm down already! The elections were held Zyuganov lost. I am a Stalinist myself. In the days of Stalin, people like Zyuganov would have been shot!

      Wherever you go to the site, instead of constructive discussion they write "waiting for their owners" or some other crap. One PR man at the headquarters of the communists wrote, worked denyuzhku. Other idiots without brains copy and pass off as their clever thoughts and point of view.
  15. +1
    29 May 2012 19: 50
    Well, discussing technology, politics, local conflicts is one thing, and I think about the possibility of a full-scale war between one nuclear power and another, I consider it unproductive for ordinary people (where I relate myself) - and not only because it is the privilege of the General Staff.
  16. +1
    30 May 2012 14: 36
    Chinese amphibious assault. Where will it land? - Oh, sho few places? Take, at least, the north of the western hemisphere. Take a walk - I don't want to.
  17. +1
    30 May 2012 15: 16
    GritsWell, you are my fellow countryman dear! I am from Dalnerechensk, Primorsky Territory! We do not have more than one military man. The Border Guards Brigade and the Naval Brigade remained. And it's all! In the place of the former military units, the ruins, I think if only they had passed through a hail, then they would have been more healthy, and so the locals were devastated after the soldiers left!

    By the way, I can say with accuracy that there is already no PULAD (fortified area) in Koltsevoe! Disbanded!

    1. DDA
      DDA
      +1
      31 May 2012 03: 42
      I completely agree with my fellow countrymen, I myself am from Nakhodka, in Primorye there is a sufficient number of Chinese who see with their own eyes our "defense capability" both along the sea coast and along the land border.
      It is also necessary to consider that the Chinese economy is one of the leading in the world. and compared to ours even more so! And it is not difficult for China to modernize and equip its army, including digesting the latest Russian developments. using our resources, electricity and oil. In general, the situation is somewhat reminiscent of how, before the Great Patriotic War, when the Soviet Union supplied it with resources until the German attack! Therefore, it makes no sense to reason why landing ships are to China and where they will go! It is even necessary to restore the defense capability of the Far Eastern region, especially the south, as it is a strategic region of Russia in the Asia-Pacific region, by the way, the economic and geopolitical future will be for those who rule in this region, and those in old Europe !!!
  18. 0
    31 May 2012 06: 50
    I believe that in years 20 China will inappropriately land special forces and troops on the coast of the Far East. In 20 years, the population of the Far East will decrease by 1 / 3, and the population of China will increase by 1 / 3. Ask why? Well, about China, I will explain nebudu, you know. And here is an example about us: the city of Dalnerechensk, a subsidized city in 2005; there were 30 thousand of the population, from 27tys. people and this, together with the nearest villages that are part of the mountains. the county! for 7 years, the population of a small town decreased by 3 thousand and you need to take what we like to overstate the numbers! So give it a go.
  19. Grits
    +1
    31 May 2012 13: 17
    I myself am from Kirovsky and I know that the military unit closest to us in the south is an air regiment with a Su-25 in Chernihiv. There is nothing north to Bikin itself. In fact - walk the field .... Therefore, I’m sure that at the beginning of the Chinese offensive in Primorye, only the Ussuri, Sungach and swamps will be the main barrier. And further east to the taiga, it makes no sense to move. It is enough to capture the entire transport infrastructure and cities. Which almost everyone is on the border. However, this is in theory. The reality is different. I am firmly convinced that the Chinese will never agree to this. They are not suicides ...
  20. -1
    31 May 2012 16: 32
    GritsYes they will not. They will do everything in a peaceful way. Our corrupt government itself, for the money will allow the Chinese to settle on our lands. All border regions will go to China for rent. Only ours will use minerals and the fleet base in Vladivostok. Well, there will be parts like peacekeeping in order to protect the Chinese from evil drunk Russians, but I'm joking.

    Ehhh it's a shame for the Motherland!
  21. Nickname
    -1
    31 May 2012 20: 32
    Now the phrase "Specific information was supplied via the Internet" is understandable.
    Joke. But I read the comments with pleasure.
  22. 0
    1 June 2012 03: 26
    Somewhere in a week or so I will provide photos of the former military unit of the Count. I will also tell you what is on the site of military unit in the village of LOZO and where did the officers and warrant officers of these units go.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"