The enemy is not Russia, but the radical Islamization of Europe. Riot in the Danish kingdom?

26
Marie Krarup, one of the leaders of the Danish People’s Party, in her interview with the popular Copenhagen newspaper Berlingsk, expressed the view that the enemy of the European Union had never been Russia, and is not such today. With Moscow, of course, you can be in hostile relations, only the latter does not want to do this. And the EU’s greatest threat today is far from being generalized Russians, but Arab migrants and the radical Islamization of Europe as a whole. This is the opinion of the Danish politician.

The enemy is not Russia, but the radical Islamization of Europe. Riot in the Danish kingdom?


Speaking about the situation in the Russian Federation as a whole and about the attitude of the Danes towards Moscow, the Kremlin and Putin, Krarup talks about the ignorance of his compatriots, whose knowledge about life outside Denmark is limited only by information from local media. And the press and other Western news resources for the most part are often politically engaged, and, therefore, do not represent a reliable picture of what is happening in the world.



Throughout the interview, Krarup repeats that Russia is not an enemy to the Danish kingdom, nor to the European Union as a whole. And it would be better to establish business relations with Moscow long ago. But in the EU, everyone plays under the tune of the overseas Big Brother in anti-Russian sanctions. Although all European countries would be better to pursue their own independent policy of rapprochement with the Russian Federation, rather than the opposite policy of confrontation with it.

Summing up, Marie Krarup concludes that demonizing Russia is beneficial only to the United States, which by all means wants to squeeze the Russian Federation out of the European energy market, and thereby weaken the Russian economy. But for the EU, friendship with the Russian Federation would be much more advantageous than hostility, so all European countries should now strive for this.

Recall that earlier, the official Copenhagen refused to allow Russia to pass the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline in the Danish territorial waters. Russia used an alternative option in terms of the route SP-2, continuing its implementation.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    10 October 2018 17: 30
    Summing up, Marie Krarup concludes that demonizing Russia is beneficial only to the United States, which by all means wants to squeeze the Russian Federation out of the European energy market, and thereby weaken the Russian economy. But for the EU, friendship with the Russian Federation would be much more advantageous than hostility, so all European countries should now strive for this.

    A voice crying in the wilderness ... though sane and surprisingly sober.
    1. +6
      10 October 2018 17: 38
      Quote: NEXUS
      A voice crying in the wilderness ... though sane and surprisingly sober.

      A bit late came to their senses, who bombed the BV carrying "democracy and prosperity"?
      And they knew perfectly well where the refugees would rush from the bombing and arbitrariness of the igil ..? Who benefits, but I will not say anything about it. hi
      1. 0
        10 October 2018 18: 32
        Well, they rushed to Europe ... And to us from this what, a loss?
        1. +3
          10 October 2018 19: 23
          Quote: Don Quixote

          Late came to their senses

          With the gas pipeline too late, gas passed by. In a literal sense.
    2. +2
      10 October 2018 17: 40
      Quote: NEXUS
      Summing up, Marie Krarup concludes that demonizing Russia is beneficial only to the United States, which by all means wants to squeeze the Russian Federation out of the European energy market, and thereby weaken the Russian economy. But for the EU, friendship with the Russian Federation would be much more advantageous than hostility, so all European countries should now strive for this.

      A voice crying in the wilderness ... though sane and surprisingly sober.

      Well, when the money runs past your pocket, then involuntarily the Europeans begin to think sensibly. Until the moment when the dollar or euro faucet does not open. laughing
    3. 0
      10 October 2018 17: 47
      Already not Voice .... Eye opened slightly. What and sought Russia ..
      ("the triumphal march of Soviet power" wink )
    4. +20
      10 October 2018 17: 47
      In the context of the topic, so to speak, I highly recommend (if anyone is not already familiar) the work of the "comrades" Buchanan and Huntington. So to speak, an adequate point of view from within Western society on the problem, its normal representatives. And here we are in many ways similar ...
      And these works are, by veil, prophetic (1993 and 2002 of the year), written and published before the current European migration crises and peaks of suicidal tolerance and mythical multiculturalism.
      Patrick J. Buchanan published the book Death of the West. How do the extinction of the population and the increase in immigration threaten our country and civilization ”(with cruel examples from life) in which he developed ideas about the internal crisis of European civilization, the reasons for which Buchanan sees in the decline in the birth rate, the breakdown of society into conflicting ethnic, religious and other communities and groups, de-Christianization of the USA and European countries. P. Buchanan gives the most important analysis of processes in Western ideology, culture and politics, leading to suicidal decisions for the peoples of the West. Depopulation processes caused by family destruction lead to the extinction of the native European peoples and the white population of the United States. Uncontrolled migration makes it possible to quickly replace them with immigrants from Asia, Africa and Latin America. Uncontrolled immigration threatens to destroy the country in which the Americans grew up and turn America into a chaotic cluster of nations that have virtually nothing in common with each other - no history, no folklore, no language, no culture, no faith, no ancestors. A kind of new Balkanization ...
      Quotes from the book:
      “Today, the peoples of Europe are being taught that justice demands that they, in“ compensation ”for their past sins, open their borders and share shelter with the descendants of those who were oppressed by their ancestors, no matter how many of them expressed a desire to come. Marxists? After all, they are demanded of no less than demographic, national and cultural suicide - of course, for the good of humanity! "
      "We can convince children as much as we want that gender differences are purely speculative concepts, that all civilizations, cultures, religions and states are equal. The real world will show them that they have been cruelly deceived."
      "There is only one difference between an enemy raid and immigration: enemies will come and go, but immigrants will remain ..."
      "Show me a person who sincerely believed in the equality of cultures and civilizations. Do the followers of the Prophet Muhammad consider Christianity to be an equal religion with Islam? ... Have all cultures created equally great examples of poetry, prose, painting, sculpture, music and architecture?" really believes it? Are nations and states equal? ​​If so, why are refugees from all over the world flocking to the West? Are people really equal? ​​"
      The Clash of Civilizations ?, published in 1993 (and its sequel, Clash of Civilizations and the Transformation of the World Order, 1996 of the Year), is Samuel Huntington’s historical and philosophical treatise on peace after the Cold War. The American political scientist argued that future wars would not be between countries, but between cultures, and that Islamic extremism would be the biggest threat to world peace. S. Huntington - a significant figure in modern sociology and political science, describes the situation that developed at the beginning of the 90's. XX century In the 90's. priority is given to cultural, national values, when, after the collapse of the USSR, new states appear on the world map, the self-identification of peoples begins.
      The greatest danger today is not the class conflicts of the rich and the poor, but namely between peoples of different cultural identities. The interconnectedness of peoples makes these conflicts more widespread and bloody. The differences between civilizations are extremely significant in religion and language. However, if you can “find a common language” in a language, then in religion this is quite difficult, due to completely different doctrines. The main clash that continues today is the clash of Western civilization and religion with Islamic religion. One can safely say that this is a global conflict, and the degree of escalation of the conflict is very high, there is so little in common and so much disagreement between them. Therefore, the West and the Islamic world are in a quasi-war, which is also destructive and negative for both sides. This is more a civilization war than an ideological one. Ideology only fuels this conflict. It is difficult to predict what this confrontation will lead to, however, there is no doubt that Islam is spreading wider and wider today.

      PSVery interesting. And informative.
      1. +1
        10 October 2018 18: 36
        Thank you Pax! What you wrote already liked. good
        I will have to look for these books.
        1. 0
          10 October 2018 21: 34
          Dear Pax, very informative! On the basis of these books and on fresh examples of Islamization and the capture by migrants of the EU, and of Matrassia, one could completely defend a doctoral degree in sociology and philosophy.
          That's just for those who pay for science, this is not at all necessary ....
      2. 0
        11 October 2018 01: 06
        Read "Colors of Jihad", this is not a book, but several articles for those who are interested in BV and current events.
    5. +1
      10 October 2018 17: 49
      Quote: NEXUS
      A voice crying in the wilderness ... though sane and surprisingly sober.


      More like a mosquito squeak. What position does this "sane" one take in the power structure of Denmark and how is she able to influence the general policy of the country?
    6. +3
      10 October 2018 18: 19
      There are enough sober-minded people in Denmark. My son-in-law has always been against a tolerant policy, against the EU in general, and for equal relations with Russia. He is collecting a party against the "aliens". 4000 subscribers already.
      Generally a good, calm, balanced man. I respect him.
  2. +3
    10 October 2018 17: 31
    The Danes changed their minds a lot after the GDP invited the children of American diplomats to the Christmas tree! And after the heroic deed of the military, which caused fire on himself, you finally greatly extinguished Russophobia!
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    10 October 2018 17: 40
    she’d be put in the sweet spot, the prime minister, at least then, you look at her words, and would listen ...
    1. +1
      10 October 2018 17: 53
      Then you look, he would have changed his mind.
    2. +2
      10 October 2018 18: 40
      The Danes did not go to the EU the first time. They were against, as the referendum showed.
      Well, then, as usual: quickly changed the premiere, and Wellcome Euro Union.
      The first bank they opened Albanians 2 months after entry.
      And it started ...
  5. +1
    10 October 2018 17: 51
    That is, Denmark does not need money for gas transit.
  6. +3
    10 October 2018 17: 54
    The Islamization of Europe is not over yet. Still to come. We will see.
  7. +10
    10 October 2018 17: 55
    Islamization is not only in Europe ...
    1. -2
      10 October 2018 18: 43
      Well, yes, in Asia, they say there’s nowhere to go from it ...
      request fellow
  8. +4
    10 October 2018 18: 06
    Migrants were specially invited to Europe to crush the protests of the lower layers of the white population, creating such a subclass of poorer and more determined ones. Therefore, if Europeans took up the mind, they would not vote for politicians with such a position on migration.
  9. 0
    11 October 2018 00: 05
    I don’t care at their words, for only actions are important.
    But actions against us so far ...
  10. 0
    11 October 2018 00: 11
    When Peter lll was about to fight Denmark, he was simply overthrown. The Russian officers simply could not understand, and why did this Denmark surrender to us to fight ... Austrians, Prussians (Germans), Swedes, Poles are another matter ... Give it to us. And they didn’t want to fight with the Danes ... and even then they didn’t, and now ... why the hell are we kingdoms
    1. 0
      11 October 2018 06: 47
      Yes, there is some sense in the war with Denmark - for the Danish Straits. Those who control them control the passage to the Baltic Sea. See for yourself on the map the same strategic position for securing the blockade as the Bosphorus / Dardanelles, Suez, Malacca, Hormuz and other canals and straits.
  11. 0
    11 October 2018 06: 39
    Still mermaids in the Danish kingdom? However, there are too many uncles with harpoons and hooks ...
  12. +1
    11 October 2018 10: 04
    Islamization is a problem not only for Europe. Even the Philippines has radicals. But if you go for a walk in Kurban Bayram in Moscow ... then it turns out that everything is different with us than in Europe! Everything is fine with us - peace, friendship, international! Hooray!